Benoît Ludwig Brussels Van Den Eynde

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Benoît Ludwig Brussels Van Den Eynde VAN DEN EYNDE BENOÎT BRUSSELS LUDWIG Photo by Flynn Larsen 24 THE TUMOR DEFENSE DISMANTLER He began his career helping to lay the scientific groundwork for modern immunotherapy. Now he’s unraveling the myriad ways tumors thwart immune attack—and showing how to undo those defenses. In science, as in many other things, it’s the researchers expected the antigen would surprises that tend to stick with you—and be a randomly mutated version of a normal sometimes in more ways than one. gene—a neoantigen—which would appear foreign to T cells, provoking attack. “To Benoît Van den Eynde got a big one nearly our surprise, the antigen turned out to be three decades ago, while working with identical to the normal gene,” recalls Ludwig Thierry Boon, the founding director of the Member Van den Eynde. “We called it P1A Brussels Branch of the Ludwig Institute and realized quite quickly that the gene is for Cancer Research. Boon had previously expressed in the tumor but mostly silent shown in a series of milestone studies in the in normal tissues.” Reported in 1991, it was late 70s and early 80s that the mammalian the first of what would come to be called immune system can detect and clear cancer, the “MAGE-type” or “cancer testis” antigens, a possibility most scientists doubted at the which are expressed in human cancers as time. By the mid-80s, his team was racing to well and would become central to several find in mice and humans the first example immunotherapy strategies. of a naturally occurring cancer antigen, a molecular flag that marks diseased cells for P1A, for its part, stuck around as a useful targeting by T cells of the immune system. tool. Roughly a decade and a half later, Van den Eynde was working on the mice. Van den Eynde used it to construct a mouse model for an inducible cancer Based on their previous studies on tumors that provides a venue for a more realistic with chemically induced mutations, the assessment of immunotherapies. In 2017, 25 a year of credit in his clinical training for two “People are trying to spent on research and joined Boon’s newly opened Ludwig Branch in 1985. confirm those findings Based on its studies of mice, Boon’s team was by the mid-’80s creating what amounted but, if correct, spliced to personalized cancer vaccines for a small group of melanoma patients. The vaccines peptides will have to be worked quite well, even curing a German patient’s widely metastasized cancer—a landmark, if rarely repeated, event in the taken into account history of cancer immunotherapy. Van den Eynde, for his part, joined an effort to in vaccine design and identify the melanoma antigens and asked his medical school administrators for another two years to continue his research. Once across immunology.” again, his request was granted. In 1989, Van den Eynde published a paper in the International Journal of Cancer showing that the German patient’s T cells appeared he and his colleagues reported in Nature to target at least six naturally occurring Communications how they used that model antigens on her melanoma cells. Thrilled, to elucidate a novel mechanism of immune Van den Eynde dropped his medical studies resistance in tumors. In another study and, leading a small group by 1994, set about published in Cancer Immunology Research discovering antigens in melanoma and other in 2017, Van den Eynde and his team probed human cancers. He received his PhD in 1995. a separate mechanism of malignant immunosuppression and showed that it Over the next few years, Boon’s team raced might be overcome with the use of an anti- to translate its discoveries—particularly the inflammatory drug already on the market. MAGE cancer antigens—into cancer vaccines for more general use. Van den Eynde’s Becoming a scientist research, however, would take him down a When Benoît Van den Eynde was in high scientific path more fundamental in nature school near Brussels, his grandparents yet just as relevant to cancer immunotherapy. bought him a subscription to a science magazine. The gift opened his mind to Incisive science scientific discovery. “I thought, ‘This is a cool Sick cells alert the immune system to job to do,’” he recalls. their condition by chopping up abnormal proteins associated with their pathology and The thought stuck with him and, at 18, in his presenting the fragments, or peptides, to T second year of medical school at Université cells. The chopping is done by an enzymatic catholique de Louvain in Brussels, he asked machine known as the proteasome, the a biochemist if he could join his laboratory presenting by a family of proteins called MHC as a student researcher. After graduating (HLA in humans and H-2 in mice). In 2000, with honors with his medical degree, Van Van den Eynde’s group published a paper in den Eynde qualified for a five-year program Immunity describing a cancer antigen derived in internal medicine. But, still feeling the tug from a protein that was expressed in all cell of science, he exercised an option to claim types; the antigen seemed normal in every 26 Photo by Flynn Larsen way, yet it elicited a T cell attack only on vaccine design and across immunology,” says cancer cells, not healthy ones. Van den Eynde. “There was a paradox there,” says Van den His team also discovered that cancer cells Eynde, “and it was in trying to understand that tend to deploy a standard proteasome, while paradox that I became interested in antigen normal antigen-presenting cells express what processing.” is known today as the immunoproteasome— which is built from a different mix of Van den Eynde’s subsequent exploration of enzymatic subunits that generate distinctly the anomaly—which continues today—was different peptides for presentation. “If you rich with discovery. He and his colleagues want to trigger an immune response that is reported in 2004 in Science an entirely novel meaningful in cancer patients,” explains Van type of antigen processing, in which peptides den Eynde, “it would be better to trigger T are spliced and then shuffled so that their cells activated by peptides produced by the amino acid sequence no longer resembles standard proteasome.” any part of the original protein. A recent independent study suggested as many as La resistance a third of the peptides presented to T cells While exploring cancer antigens, Van den could be of that variety. “People are trying to Eynde also became increasingly interested confirm those findings but, if correct, spliced in the mechanisms by which tumors evade peptides will have to be taken into account in immune attack. In 1998, he came across a 27 Photo by Flynn Larsen paper showing that cells in the mammalian T cells almost entirely, rather than those in placenta help prevent T cell attack of the which IDO expression is induced by stimuli embryo by harnessing an enzyme known as such as immunotherapy. indoleamine 2,3-deoxygenase-1 (IDO-1), which deprives killer T cells of a vital nutrient—the Tumors of the former category were, in fact, amino acid tryptophan. Van den Eynde and a focus of the study Van den Eynde and his his colleagues reported in Nature Medicine in colleagues published in Cancer Immunology 2003 that tumors do the same. This sparked Research in 2017. Van den Eynde and his an industrywide race to develop IDO inhibitors colleagues suspected steady IDO expression as cancer therapies. Van den Eynde himself might account for the immunologic chill of launched, with Ludwig’s support, a spinoff such “cold tumors” and set about probing named iTeos—a story covered in the 2014 why it occurs. Their study revealed that the Ludwig Research Highlights report. steady expression of IDO depends on COX-2— an enzyme involved in inflammation—and its Unfortunately, the 2018 failure in Phase primary product, a long fat molecule named III trials of an IDO-1 inhibitor prompted prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). developers to pull back from the therapeutic class. But Van den Eynde remains optimistic PGE2, they showed, is produced by those that IDO inhibition still holds promise. A tumors and activates a signaling cascade better selection of tumors for IDO inhibition, within cells that triggers IDO1 expression. he believes, could improve efficacy in trials. Van den Eynde and his team showed in an It might, for example, work better in tumors immunologically reconstituted mouse model that continuously express IDO and lack killer of human ovarian cancer that blocking COX2 28 with a drug named celecoxib effectively shut down the constitutive expression of IDO-1 and “I thought, led to tumor rejection. ‘This is a “Celecoxib is already on the market, so you don’t need to do a drug development program before you test it in patients,” says Van den cool job to Eynde. Indeed, he is already in discussions with oncologists at the University Hospital do.’ ” Saint-Luc in Brussels about running a small clinical trial combining celecoxib and Photo by Flynn Larsen checkpoint blockade as a cancer therapy. Countering countersurveillance I was expecting that in this case the T cells Around the time Van den Eynde began mulling would be able to reject the tumor,” says Van IDO in the late 90s, he was also thinking den Eynde. “But they had no effect at all.” about how to develop a tumor model that might more faithfully recapitulate immune When the same P1A-expressing cancer suppression in tumors. Mouse models cells were transplanted into mice, however, available in the 90s were made by injecting they were cleared by ACT.
Recommended publications
  • Ludwig Institute Consolidated Financial Report for 2012
    Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd Statutory Financial Statements 2012 Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd, Zurich Report of the Statutory Auditor on the Financial Statements to the General Meeting of Shareholders Financial Statements 2012 KPMG AG Zurich, May 14, 2013 - 8 - Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd - 9 - Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd - 10 - Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd Balance Sheet as at December 31, 2012 USD CHF 2012 2011 2012 2011 Assets Current assets Liquid funds (Notes 1 & 2) 22,138,495 15,385,587 20,265,932 14,387,043 Fixed term deposits (Notes 1 & 2) 6,439,223 14,765,382 5,894,618 13,806,828 Other receivables - Third parties 2,640,414 3,461,456 2,417,059 3,236,845 External funding 3,888,612 3,411,279 3,559,672 3,189,902 Prepayments and accrued income 3,120,349 2,681,977 2,856,387 2,507,918 Total current assets 38,227,093 39,705,681 34,993,668 37,128,536 Fixed assets Financial fixed assets - Investments (Note 4) 7,080,599 5,103,000 6,481,635 4,771,815 Other (Notes 1 & 5) 1,517,679 1,987,090 1,389,319 1,858,180 Total fixed assets 8,598,278 7,090,090 7,870,954 6,629,995 Total assets 46,825,371 46,795,771 42,864,622 43,758,531 Liabilities and Net worth Current liabilities Accounts payable - third parties (Note 7) 8,873,562 10,624,684 8,122,981 9,935,143 Accruals (Note 1) 6,507,197 7,514,082 5,956,785 7,026,474 Provisions (Notes 1 & 8) 5,839,674 5,860,811 5,345,653 5,480,518 Deferred income (Notes 1 & 10) 6,887,424 10,096,102 6,304,919 9,441,140 Total current liabilities 28,107,857 34,095,679
    [Show full text]
  • Ludwig Institute Consolidated Financial Report for 2019
    Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd, Zurich Report of the Statutory Auditor on the Consolidated Financial Statements to the General Meeting of Shareholders Consolidated Financial Statements 2019 KPMG AG Zurich, May 22, 2020 KPMG AG Audit Räffelstrasse 28 PO Box Telephone +41 58 249 31 31 CH-8045 Zurich CH-8036 Zurich Internet www.kpmg.ch Report of the Statutory Auditor to the General Meeting of Shareholders of Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd, Zurich Report of the Statutory Auditor on the Consolidated Financial Statements As statutory auditor, we have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd, which comprise the balance sheet, income statement, statement of cash flows, statement of capital changes and notes for the year ended December 31, 2019. Board of Directors’ Responsibility The board of directors is responsible for the preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with Swiss GAAP FER and the requirements of Swiss law. This responsibility includes designing, implementing and maintaining an internal control system relevant to the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. The board of directors is further responsible for selecting and applying appropriate accounting policies and making accounting estimates that are reasonable in the circumstances. Auditor’s Responsibility Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with Swiss law and Swiss Auditing Standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.
    [Show full text]
  • Don Cleveland Shows How Research in Neuroscience Is Leading to New Approaches to Treat Brain Cancer
    18 INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH Ludwig Cancer Research has a long tradition of nurturing investigators who see connections among different fi elds. The work of Ludwig scientist Don Cleveland shows how research in neuroscience is leading to new approaches to treat brain cancer. 19 TECHNIQUE TO VANQUISH DISEASE IN NERVOUS SYSTEM APPLIED TO CANCER Richard Smith, a neurologist who has a roster of patients with neurodegenerative disease, would not leave Ludwig scientist Don Cleveland alone. Cleveland’s laboratory at Ludwig San Diego had the means to test an idea to help people with Don Cleveland amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, also called Lou Gehrig’s disease), whom Smith saw regularly at his San Diego clinic. “He was relentless in badgering me,” recalls Cleveland of their interactions in 2005. The idea was to silence a gene that is mutated in a proportion of inherited ALS cases, caused by mutation in SOD-1 (superoxide dismutase 1), in the hope that quelling the bad gene could also quell disease. To silence the gene, Smith suggested using an antisense oligonucleotide, a small piece of single-stranded DNA. It was designed to destroy the gene’s mRNA, a molecular intermediary between the gene and the protein it encodes. Smith proposed testing the oligonucleotide in animals with a pump that would infuse the DNA drug directly into the cerebrospinal fl uid, essentially bathing the brain and spinal cord in it. To work, the drug needed to be taken up by the motor neurons. Cleveland didn’t think this would happen. But Smith, who later spent two years in Cleveland’s lab working on the project, argued that they had nothing to lose.
    [Show full text]
  • LUDWIG LINK | NOVEMBER 2013 Irector of Communications Irector Steinhardt Achel Positive
    LUDWIG LINK NOVEMBER 2013 IN THIS ISSUE 3 | Oxford Report 11 | Irv Weissman Q&A News from the Ludwig A conversation with the scientific retreat Ludwig Stanford director Continued inside > LUDWIG LINK | NOVEMBER 2013 1 LUDWIG LINK NOVEMBER 2013 LETTER Fall is an ideal time to refresh the mind and engage in creative new thinking and direction. TABLE OF CONTENTS And last month started off on a high note, with a Ludwig retreat Meeting Notes 3 in Oxford that packed three Getting to know you days with information sharing 3 Abracadabra and networking. The caliber 4 of the content, speakers and attendees was amazing Company News in itself. It was an unparalleled opportunity to foster 4 interactions and collaborations among some of the most Well designed 4 distinguished researchers from around the world. News Roundup 5 The passion was palpable from the presentations to the Buyer beware 5 coffee breaks and after-hour conversations. Off-site Dark horse 5 meetings encourage out-of-the-box thinking because Don’t delete 6 being in unfamiliar surroundings can break old habits Sn(i)ps 7 and generate energy, leading to fresh ideas and deeper Fickle finger of cell fate 7 LUDWIG LINK | NOVEMBER 2013 thinking. The splice of life 8 Eats, shoots and leaves 9 And the feedback couldn’t have been more positive. “The retreat offered me an incredible opportunity to Ask a Scientist 10 foster new and deeper collaborations with other Ludwig labs. It felt like the cancer biologist’s version of AC/DC’s Q&A with Irv Weissman 11 greatest hits album!” said Adriel Cha of Ludwig Stanford.
    [Show full text]
  • LUDWIG LINK | JULY 2014 Director of Communications Director Steinhardt Rachel Sincerely, Reading! Happy More Prizes
    LUDWIG LINK 2014 | JULY IN THIS ISSUE LUDWIG 8 | News Roundup 14 | Q&A Bird virus boosts Peter Gibbs of Ludwig LINK effectiveness of Melbourne-WEHI on immunotherapy effort inspiration and science JULY 2014 Continued inside > 1 LUDWIG LINK JULY 2014 LETTER Antoine-Augustin Parmentier got one in 1773 for identifying a vegetable that could ease TABLE OF CONTENTS famines, and popularized the potato in France. About a Awards and distinctions 3 century and a half later, Charles Cancer’s worst enemy 3 Lindbergh got one for flying Turbocharged team 3 from New York to Paris, and Inspired immunotherapist 4 revolutionized the business of aviation. More recently, A new chief 4 the X Prize Foundation used one to kick off a commercial Nonpareil class 5 space race. Meeting notes 6 A prize is what each of them got. Prizes inspire human achievement at least as much as they celebrate it. And Omne trium perfectum 6 they give the rest of us an opportunity to tip our collective hats to the intrepid, the inspired and the awe-inspiring. News roundup 7 Real hope for real change 7 In this issue you’ll read about 13 Ludwig scientists who Of birds and men 8 dared to ask big questions. Each of the awards won by our Developmental disorders 8 LUDWIG LINK 2014 | JULY researchers this year recognizes significant contributions Clairvoyant 9 to cancer research or therapy. Taken together, they serve Making headway 10 as testament to the high caliber of Ludwig research and DNA detectives 10 the dedication of its scientists. Break repair 11 The nuclear option 12 We also asked three young Ludwig researchers from around the world how prizes impact science.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Progress Report and 2019 Update
    2018 Progress Report and 2019 Update Defeat GBM Research Collaborative Key Personnel: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS • Tim Cloughesy, MD A NOTE FROM THE CEO University of California, Los Angeles • John de Groot, MD MD Anderson Cancer Center Over the past five years, the Defeat GBM Research Collaborative has stood as a testament to the power of ideas, collaboration, and the philanthropic partnership • Frank Furnari, PhD between patient advocacy nonprofits like NBTS and a dedicated community of Ludwig Cancer Research, supporters. University of California, San Diego • Dimpy Koul, PhD When we launched Defeat GBM as our flagship research initiative in 2014, we MD Anderson Cancer Center sought to do something different. Decades of grant-making in the traditional form of funding separate, individual research projects (one- to two-year grants • Ingo Mellinghoff, MD to a single Principle Investigator) had produced extraordinary knowledge of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center biology of glioblastoma cells, but not nearly enough of this work was primed to • Paul Mischel, MD move out of research laboratories and into clinical trials for patients. Ludwig Cancer Research, University of California, San Diego NBTS wanted to see what could be accomplished if, instead of continuing this traditional model of research funding, we deep-funded a team of expert • Erik Sulman, MD, PhD researchers, over a five-year period, to work collaboratively. This team would be NYU Langone’s Perlmutter charged with working across the continuum of research to translate a scientific Cancer Center discovery into an actionable treatment strategy and/or medical product that could • Roel Verhaak, PhD be tested in clinical trials, and hopefully become an approved new therapeutic The Jackson Laboratory option for patients.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Research Highlights
    2019 RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS LIFE-CHANGING SCIENCE 1 2 WELCOME Welcome to the Ludwig 2019 Research Highlights Report. As we do every year, we’ve selected a handful of recent discoveries and advances made by Edward A. researchers affiliated with Ludwig Cancer Research and woven the stories behind each into McDermott Jr. President and profiles of the scientists responsible for them. Chief Executive Officer The intention is to illustrate the depth and breadth of Ludwig’s life-changing science. But the stories told in this report also speak to the human side of science—the aspirations and fascinations that drive scientific research, the relationships that fuel its progress—as much as the fundamental challenges of cancer biology and care. Beyond that, they illustrate the truly global scope of the scientific effort to defeat cancer. You will thus read here about the improbable journey of a boy living hand-to-mouth in a coastal Chi Van Dang Chinese village to a U.S. university and on to the frontiers of medical nanotechnology, where Scientific his inventions, now in clinical trials, are putting a new twist on chemo- and radiotherapy. Director You’ll learn about how a bright young girl from California moved to aid children with Down syndrome grew into an inspired clinical neurologist whose research is bringing new hope to kids diagnosed with an intractable brain cancer and people afflicted by the cognitive decline caused by chemotherapy. Another profile charts the path taken by a British nephrologist to a landmark discovery of how cells sense and respond to oxygen—a system of profound significance in cancer—and his recent identification of a second, evolutionarily ancient cellular oxygen sensor.
    [Show full text]
  • Ludwig Presence at 2016 AACR Annual Meeting
    Ludwig Presence at 2016 AACR Annual Meeting Ludwig Scientist (s) Affiliation (s) Session Time Location Session Type Session Title Presentation/Abstract Title & Time SATURDAY, APRIL 16 Using Tumor Biology to Drive Room 288, Morial Convention 9:30am - 9:55am: Immunotherapies for Sarcoma: Crystal Mackall Ludwig Stanford 8:00am - 10:00am Educational Session More Effective Sarcoma Center Progress and Challenges Therapy Room 278, Morial Convention Cancer Immunology for the Crystal Mackall Ludwig Stanford 10:15am -12:15pm Educational Session 10:15am - 12:15pm: Education Manuscript Center Non-Immunologist: Tutorial SUNDAY, APRIL 17 Ovarian cancer Room 343, Morial Convention Meet-the-Expert George Coukos Ludwig Lausanne 7:00am - 8:00am immunotherapy. From bench Invited speaker Center Session to bedside Cellular Plasticity, Cellular Room 288, Morial Convention Meet-the-Expert Xin Lu Ludwig Oxford 7:00am - 8:00am Heterogeneity and Single Cell Invited speaker Center Session Sequencing Stapled Peptides as a New Room 357, Morial Convention Meet-the-Expert Form of Medicine for David Lane Ludwig New York 7:00am - 8:00am Invited speaker Center Session Oncology Targets: Challenges and Progress Room 271, Morial Convention Meet-the-Expert The Role of Metabolism in Matthew Vander Heiden Ludwig MIT 7:00am - 8:00am Invited speaker Center Session Supporting Tumor Growth Thirteenth Annual AACR Award for Lifetime Bob Weinberg Ludwig MIT 8:15am - 9:00am Hall F, Morial Convention Center Awards and Lectures Award recipient Achievement in Cancer Research Thirty-Sixth
    [Show full text]
  • Consummate Neuro-Oncologist
    THE CONSUMMATE NEURO-ONCOLOGIST Michelle Monje’s teenage project to aid the disabled led her to neurology and a research career that’s bringing new hope for the treatment of childhood brain cancers and the mind-fog caused by chemotherapy. Competitive figure skating was once a big abiding interest in neurology. In keeping part of Michelle Monje’s life. By the time she with her mother’s advice, Monje has over was in middle school in the Bay Area of San the past quarter century made significant Francisco, Monje was squeezing in as many contributions to our understanding of as 35 hours of practice every week at the the brain’s postnatal plasticity and the rink. Then her mother, who’d started at IBM in neurological disorders caused by cancer the late 60’s as a computer programmer and therapies. She has also led the charge worked her way up to the executive ranks, against a swiftly lethal childhood cancer of had a little chat with her. “She pointed out the brainstem known as diffuse intrinsic that dedicating that much time to a sport pontine glioma (DIPG), charting new was great,” Monje recalls, “but perhaps I approaches to the treatment of the long- should also think about how I’m going to be neglected cancer and other high-grade productive and contribute to the rest of the gliomas that she is now—or soon will be— world.” Just 13 at the time, Monje mulled evaluating in clinical trials. the matter for a spell and came up with a precociously fitting answer: She created In 2018, Monje and her colleagues reported a figure skating program for children with in Cell their dissection of the cellular Down syndrome.
    [Show full text]
  • Web Cavenee, Who Study the Diverse Cellular Mechanisms That Drive Cancer
    24 COMBINATION Ludwig Cancer Research has long fostered research in several core areas. These include the study of melanoma, brain tumors and, more broadly, immunotherapy— research on how to modulate the immune system to attack tumors. Ludwig’s emphasis on these core areas has led to a multipronged view of tumors, fostering the development of therapies that can be used in combination. This approach may counteract cancer more effectively than any single treatment used in isolation. 25 TAPPING INTO NEW TARGETS FOR BRAIN CANCER If any tumor type is a candidate for combination therapy, it is glioblastoma multiforme. This aggressive brain cancer defi es most treatment strategies. Chemotherapy barely touches it, and drugs that target cancer-causing cellular molecules are also remarkably ineffective in treating it. Median survival is 15 months after diagnosis. Ludwig has long supported research programs to tackle this disease. Recently, physician-scientist Paul Mischel, a former faculty member at the University of California, Los Angeles, was recruited to the Ludwig San Diego team. He Paul Mischel has helped design and lead molecular analysis in fi ve clinical trials of therapies targeting cancer-related cellular molecules. Mischel’s expertise complements a team with strengths in basic research. It includes geneticist Frank Furnari and Ludwig San Diego director Web Cavenee, who study the diverse cellular mechanisms that drive cancer. Mischel’s move to Ludwig last fall was a natural evolution of an ongoing long- distance interaction with Furnari and Cavenee. “We have shared interests and complementary approaches,” says Mischel. “The synergies among us were Frank Furnari so great that it made sense to work closer together.” One of the trio’s most recent projects delved into why two drugs designed to inhibit a cellular molecule called epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) work poorly in patients with glioblastoma.
    [Show full text]
  • Cancer Hunter
    THE CANCER HUNTER Nickolas Papadopoulos’ early fascination with molecular genetics fueled a career-long adventure mapping cancer genomes, unearthing cancer genes and devising tests for the minimally invasive detection of cancer. Nickolas Papadopoulos was about as gathered a few people in a little room outside surprised as he was relieved to hear the his office that we called the kitchen—a voice on the other end of the line when he refrigerator, small tables and a whiteboard,” answered his lab phone one afternoon in the Papadopoulos recalls. “He said, ‘OK, now summer of 1992. The voice belonged to Bert you’re going to present your work to us.’ ” Vogelstein, a man he had never met before Vogelstein brushed off his protests, saying and to whom he had sent his one and only it wouldn’t be a problem if he knew his application for a postdoctoral position. If he stuff. After the presentation and a little didn’t get it, Papadopoulos was ready to fly Q&A, he had someone show Papadopoulos home to his native Greece. He had labored around the lab. When he returned, he found and fussed over his letter to the up-and- Vogelstein hammering out a letter on his coming cancer geneticist, but the fact was electric typewriter. The job would start in he had no experience, let alone publications, a few months, it said; Papadopoulos had in the field. Fortunately, Vogelstein had to promise he wouldn’t even interview ignored that deficiency and was now inviting elsewhere. him over for an interview. Just come over, he said.
    [Show full text]
  • Tumor Mappers
    THE TUMOR MAPPERS The unique cooperative research model of the Ludwig Center at Harvard is being productively harnessed by the Tumor Atlas Project, an ambitious effort to create high-dimensional maps of any and all tumors. When Peter Sorger set out to develop a progression and response to therapies. It method for mapping the different cells in is also a sort of technological avatar of an tumors, he didn’t expect actual mapmakers idea central to the structure of the Ludwig would be involved. So when members of Center at Harvard: to bring together diverse Harvard’s Department of Architecture biomedical disciplines and their associated approached him one day following a technologies to tackle the most intractable presentation, Sorger was surprised. “They problems of cancer research and care. said, ‘That’s really cool. Let’s work together,’” recalls Sorger, an investigator at the Ludwig It takes a village Center at Harvard and professor of systems It’s no coincidence that TAP originated at pharmacology at Harvard Medical School. Ludwig Harvard, which has a special focus “Unknown to me, Harvard was the place on drug resistance in cancer. “The Tumor where the initial GIS”—geographic information Atlas Project fits into every single project system—“was developed back in the 1950s.” we have,” Ludwig Harvard Co-director Joan Brugge observes. “The technology makes The Harvard cartographers’ expertise would it feasible to follow many different proteins prove useful for organizing and visualizing in real human tumors, which is key to an the flood of tumor data that the Ludwig understanding of the state of individual Tumor Atlas Project (TAP), led by Sorger, cells in tumor tissue prior to and after drug was generating.
    [Show full text]