DOCSLIB.ORG

Portugal MA: State of the Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Portugal MA: State of the Assessment Portugal Millennium Ecosystem Assessment State of the Assessment Report A contribution to the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, prepared by the Portugal Sub-Global Assessment Team 1 This report is a contribution to the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment prepared by the Portugal Sub-Global Assessment Team. The report has been prepared and reviewed through a process approved by the MA Board but the report itself has not been accepted or approved by the Assessment Panel or the MA Board. Centro de Biologia Ambiental, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa Citation: Pereira, H.M, T. Domingos, and L. Vicente (editors). 2004. Portugal Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: State of the Assessment Report. Centro de Biologia Ambiental, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa. Available online at http://ecossistemas.org. Requests for hardcopies can be sent to Henrique Pereira, Centro de Biologia Ambiental, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal, or by e-mail to [email protected]. Coordinating authors: Henrique M. Pereira, Tiago Domingos and Luís Vicente Lead Authors: Helena Adão, Carlos Aguiar, Francisco Andrade, Miguel Araújo, Carlos Carmona Belo, Fátima Borges, Maria João Burnay, Henrique Cabral, Helena Freitas, Fuensanta Salas Herrero, Maria Amélia Loução, João Carlos Marques, Rui Tomás Marques, Américo Mendes, Elvira Pereira, João Santos Pereira, Simone Pio, Rui Rebelo, Eugénio Sequeira, Fernando Brito Soares. Contributing Authors: Helena Carvalho, Alexandra Correia, Margarida Ferreira, Marques Ferreira, Francisco Fonseca, Paulo Marques, Cristina Marta, Humberto Martins, Maria João Martins, Rute Pinto, Vânia Proença, Cibele Queiroz, Margarida Santos-Reis User Representatives: Teresa Avelar, Paulo Canaveira, Henrique Carvalho, Isabel Guerra, Simone Pio, Cátia Rosas, Nuno Sarmento Review Editors: Isabel Guerra, Luis Rochartre Álvares, Vitor Barros, Helena Freitas, Teresa Ribeiro, Humberto Rosa Reviewers: Rui Alves, Teresa Andersen, Keneth Cassman, Teresa Pinto Correia, Luis Costa, Manuel Graça, Pedro Lencart, José Manuel Lima Santos Financial support for the MA and the MA Sub-global Assessments was provided by the Global Environmental Facility(GEF), the United Nations Foundation, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, the World Bank, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the Government of Norway, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the Swedish International Biodiversity Programme, the Rockefeller Foundation, the United States National Aeronautic and Space Administration (NASA), the International Council for Science (ICSU), the Asia Pacific Network for Global Change Research, the Christensen Fund, the United Kingdom Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), the Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), and the Ford Foundation. Other sources of financial support for the Portugal Sub-Global Assessment included Caixa Geral de Depósitos and Universidade de Coimbra. 2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................6 1.1 A brief socio-ecological description of Portugal...................................................................7 1.2 Scales and Systems................................................................................................................7 1.3 Overview of the Report .........................................................................................................9 2 Assessment Process ......................................................................................................................10 2.1 Organization ........................................................................................................................10 2.1.1 The users .........................................................................................................................11 2.1.2 The research team ...........................................................................................................12 2.1.3 The steering committee ...................................................................................................13 2.1.4 The advisory board..........................................................................................................13 2.2 Financial Support.................................................................................................................13 2.3 Products ...............................................................................................................................13 2.4 Review Process....................................................................................................................13 2.5 Timetable.............................................................................................................................14 2.6 User Needs...........................................................................................................................14 2.6.1 General user needs ..........................................................................................................15 2.6.2 Systems and regions........................................................................................................16 2.6.3 Drivers and response options ..........................................................................................16 2.6.4 Ecosystem services..........................................................................................................17 3 Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being................................................................................18 3.1 Choice of Ecosystem Services.............................................................................................18 3.2 Relevant Components of Well-being ..................................................................................18 3.3 Connection between Ecosystem Services and Human Well-being .....................................19 4 Drivers of ecosystem change ........................................................................................................20 4.1 Definitions ...........................................................................................................................20 4.2 Methods ...............................................................................................................................21 4.3 List of Drivers......................................................................................................................21 4.4 Interactions Between Drivers ..............................................................................................22 5 Conditions and Trends ..................................................................................................................24 5.1 Defining condition and trend...............................................................................................25 5.2 Methods ...............................................................................................................................25 5.3 Services assessed nationally ................................................................................................25 5.3.1 Biodiversity.....................................................................................................................25 5.3.2 Water Provisioning..........................................................................................................27 5.4 Services assessed by ecosystems.........................................................................................28 3 5.4.1 Marine and coastal ..........................................................................................................28 5.4.1.1 Food production......................................................................................................29 5.4.1.2 Recreation...............................................................................................................30 5.4.2 Forest and Montado.........................................................................................................31 5.4.2.1 Biodiversity ............................................................................................................33 5.4.2.2 Food production......................................................................................................33 5.4.2.3 Wood and cork production .....................................................................................33 5.4.2.4 Carbon sequestration ..............................................................................................34 5.4.2.5 Soil protection and run-off regulation ....................................................................34 5.4.2.6 Recreation...............................................................................................................34 5.4.3 Cultivated ........................................................................................................................35 5.4.3.1 Biodiversity ............................................................................................................36 5.4.3.2 Food production......................................................................................................36 5.4.3.3 Soil protection and run-off regulation ....................................................................37 5.4.3.4 Recreation...............................................................................................................38
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ANEJOS a Cupauam 1 Homenaje a La Profesora Catalina Galán Saulnier
    CUADERNOS DE PREHISTORIA Y ARQUEOLOGÍA UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID ANEJOS a CuPAUAM 1 Homenaje a la profesora Catalina Galán Saulnier Dpto. de Prehistoria y Arqueología - Facultad de Filosofía y Letras Vicerrectorado de Investigación. Madrid, 2014 Cuadernos de Prehistoria y Arqueología. U.A.M. Consejo de Redacción: Director: Dr. Luis Berrocal Rangel Secretario: Dr. Alfredo Mederos Martín Asesoría de edición: Dra. Mar Zamora Merchán Responsables de recensiones: Dr. Juan Blánquez Pérez (UAM), Dra. Isabel L. Rubio de Miguel (UAM) Vocales: Dr. Alicia Arévalo González (Universidad de Cádiz) Dr. Ángel Morillo Cerdán (Universidad Complutense de Madrid) Dr. Antonio Pizzo (CISC - Instituto de Arqueología de Mérida) Dr. Dirk Brandherm (University of Belfast) Dr. Dirze Marzoli (Deutsches Archäeologische Institut im Madrid) Dr. Fernando Quesada Sanz (UAM) Dr. Ignacio Montero Ruiz (CSIC – Instituto de Historia CCHS) Dr. Javier Baena Preysler (UAM) Dr. Jesús Álvarez Sanchís (Universidad Complutense de Madrid) Dr. Joaquín Barrio Martín (UAM) Dr. Laurent Callegarin (EHEH Casa de Velázquez) Dr. Mar Zarzalejos Prieto (UNED) Dr. Sebastian Celestino Pérez (CSIC- Instituto de Arqueología de Mérida) Dr. Virgilio H. Correia (Museu de Conimbriga) Consejo Asesor: Dr. Alberto Lorrio (Universidad de Alicante) Dr. Alonso Rodríguez Díaz (Universidad de Extremadura) Dr. Arturo Morales (UAM) Dr. Carlos Fabiâo (Universidad de Lisboa, Portugal) Dr. Carmen Fernández Ochoa (UAM) Dr. Claude Mordant (Universidad de Dijon, Francia) Dr. Concepción Blasco Bosqued (UAM)` Dr. Gonzalo Ruiz Zapatero (Universidad Complutense de Madrid) Dr. Ian Ralston (Universidad de Edimburgo, Reino Unido) Dr. Isabel Rodà de Llanza (Universidad de Barcelona) Dr. Joâo Luis Cardoso (Universidad Nova de Lisboa, Portugal) Dr. John Waddell (Universidad de Galway, Irlanda) Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of Family Farming in the Portuguese Political Discourse
    Article The Concept of Family Farming in the Portuguese Political Discourse Isabel Dinis 1,2 1 Instituto Politécnico de Coimbra, 3045-601 Coimbra, Portugal 2 CERNAS - Research Centre for Natural Resources, Environment and Society, 3045-601 Coimbra, Portugal; [email protected] Received: 30 May 2019; Accepted: 11 July 2019; Published: 12 July 2019 Abstract: Although several countries have outlined national and multi-criteria definitions, family farming is not well defined in most countries including Portugal, making it difficult to assess its real importance as well as the reasons underlying the design and the success/failure of particular policies. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the framing of family farming in the Portuguese political discourse by applying content analysis to a range of national policies and planning documents. The results show little reference to family farming in political documents and a conceptualization of family farming made in antagonism to professional or entrepreneurial farmers. Keywords: family farming; content analysis; agricultural policy; rural 1. Introduction Following the adhesion of Portugal to the European Economic Community (EEC) in January 1986, the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) was adopted by the country, which led to profound socio-economic changes in Portuguese agriculture. Among other things, a large amount of structural funds was made available to support the modernization of agriculture, to promote structural adjustment and finally to transform small family farmers into entrepreneurs. Since its beginning, CAP was designed and developed to support family farmers, the dominant typology in most Member States. As pointed out by Davidova and Thomson (2014), the government created an infrastructure that allowed small family farms to capture organisational-scale effects, without losing their specific features.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproducing Portuguese Villages in Africa: Agricultural Science, Ideology and Empire
    Journal of Southern African Studies ISSN: 0305-7070 (Print) 1465-3893 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cjss20 Reproducing Portuguese Villages in Africa: Agricultural Science, Ideology and Empire Cláudia Castelo To cite this article: Cláudia Castelo (2016) Reproducing Portuguese Villages in Africa: Agricultural Science, Ideology and Empire, Journal of Southern African Studies, 42:2, 267-281, DOI: 10.1080/03057070.2016.1142732 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2016.1142732 Published online: 16 Mar 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 55 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=cjss20 Download by: [b-on: Biblioteca do conhecimento online UL] Date: 14 April 2016, At: 06:34 Journal of Southern African Studies, 2016 Vol. 42, No. 2, 267–281, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2016.1142732 Reproducing Portuguese Villages in Africa: Agricultural Science, Ideology and Empire CLÁUDIA CASTELO (Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa) This article examines the political and ideological uses of agronomic research, focusing on state- directed rural white settlements in Angola. Implemented ‘against the tide’, in the mid-1950s, with Angola’s African anti-colonial movement already under way, these schemes contained numerous contradictions. Under a modernising agenda, the Estado Novo dictatorship created the colonatos of Cela and Cunene, with the expressed purpose of reproducing Portuguese rural villages in Africa, settling poor Portuguese peasants and perpetuating colonial rule. Drawing on a range of primary sources from Portuguese colonial and scientific archives and the literature on Angola, I analyse the relationship between policymakers and the agricultural engineers mobilised to study the soils and its agricultural suitability in the regions chosen for the colonatos.
    [Show full text]
  • The Paleodemography of Central Portugal and the Mesolithic-Neolithic Transition
    PALEODEMOGRAPHY OF CENTRAL PORTUGAL 1 The Paleodemography of Central Portugal and the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition MARY JACKES Department of Anthropology University of Waterloo Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada [email protected] CHRISTOPHER MEIKLEJOHN Department of Anthropology University of Winnipeg Winnipeg, MB R3B 2E9, Canada [email protected] Abstract Newly available information on the excavation of the Portuguese Mesolithic shell middens, Cabeço da Arruda and Moita do Sebastião, has allowed reassessment of the paleodemography of the sites. Following the restudy of Arruda and an examination of Moita site structure, we now discuss the problem of arriving at a minimum number of individuals (MNI) for Moita and use the age distribution of the dead to estimate the total fertility rate (TFR). We confirm the difference between Moita and Arruda and note their divergence from the Neolithic site of Casa da Moura. Our method of estimating TFR, deriving from the use of West model tables, is explained and is tested by reference to historical data sets and by calculation of equivalent demographic values using the Brass relational table approach. Our focus is the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition and we establish the context of demographic change in the late Mesolithic and early Neolithic of central Portugal by reference to changing environmental, nutritional and disease conditions. The low level of population growth at Moita would have increased during the occupation of Arruda. However, subsequent changes in climate and sea levels led to unfavorable conditions and we hypothesize that the Tagus lowlands were abandoned in favor of healthier uplands where there was a rebound and an increase in population growth in response to changed lifeways.
    [Show full text]
  • Precious Knowledge
    OO R R G G A A N N I I C C FARMINGFARMING ININ PORTUGALPORTUGAL ANAN OPPORTUNITYOPPORTUNITY FORFOR MICROMICRO ANDAND SMALLSMALL FARMERSFARMERS …… 21 Março 2021 ORGANICORGANIC FARMINGFARMING ININ PORTUGALPORTUGAL ANAN OPPORTUNITYOPPORTUNITY FORFOR MICROMICRO ANDAND SMALLSMALL FARMERSFARMERS 11 . AA G G R R O O B B I I O O 11 . AA G G R R O O B B I I O O AGROBIO – The Portuguese Association for Organic Farming, founded in 1985, is a pioneer institution, playing a determinant role in the dissemination of Organic Agriculture in Portugal. a!e more than 84## members. %t gathers people of all ages and professional bac&grounds, 'ho share concerns about food (uality, health, environment and the defense of healthier agricultural practices. De!elop 'ork with consumers, gro'ers, processors, retailers and policy makers. Agrobio is the most experienced organic agriculture association in Portugal, and ha!e a !ast experience in training, research, mar&eting and giving technical support to gro'ers. A+,OBIO is a member of IFOAM (International Federation of Organic Agriculture Mo!ements), and a member of IFOAM-EU ,egional Group. It has a recognised public utility status, and plays a threefold role as an association for agriculture, environment and consumer protection. 444.A+,OBIO.PT ORGANICORGANIC FARMINGFARMING ININ PORTUGALPORTUGAL ANAN OPPORTUNITYOPPORTUNITY FORFOR MICROMICRO ANDAND SMALLSMALL FARMERSFARMERS 22 . ORGANICORGANIC FARMINGFARMING ININ PORTUGALPORTUGAL ANDAND ININ THETHE WORLDWORLD 22 . ORGANICORGANIC FARMINGFARMING ININ PORTUGALPORTUGAL ANDAND ININ THETHE WORLDWORLD PORTUGAL Statistical data on organic farming In 2019, the agricultural area used in organic farming was 293 213 ha; The area under conversion in 2019 : 20 055 ha; The number of operators in 2019 : 6408; Producers increased in 2019 : 5637; Source: DGADR 22 .
    [Show full text]
  • PT Analytical Factsheet for Portugal
    version: September 2019 PT Analytical factsheet for Portugal: Nine objectives for a future Common Agricultural Policy This factsheet provides an overview of the agricultural sector and rural development in Portugal. The factsheet presents facts and figures for each of the 9 specific objectives of the Common Agricultural Policy after 2020, as proposed by the Commission on 1 June 2018 (COM(2018)392 final). The information reflects all common context indicators and impact indicators in relation to agriculture and rural development for which data is available to date. This factsheet is based on available information received from Member States by the Commission up to August 2019. It is made available without prejudice to any finding in respect of Member State compliance with the regulatory framework and does not prejudge on Member States' future CAP Strategic Plans. 1 Table of contents impact in Indicator Source Current CMEF indicator PMEF Support viable farm income and resilience across the Union to enhance food security Agricultural income versus general economy EUROSTAT yes Impact indicator I.01 Evolution of agricultural income EUROSTAT yes Impact indicators I.01 & I.02 Evolution of agricultural income by sector DG AGRI - FADN yes Evolution of agricultural income by farm size DG AGRI - FADN Evolution of agricultural income in ANC areas DG AGRI - FADN yes Enhance market orientation and increase competitiveness Total factor productivity EUROSTAT yes Impact indicator I.03 Gross fixed capital formation in agriculture EUROSTAT Context indicator
    [Show full text]
  • Special List 366: Christianity in Asia
    special list 366 1 RICHARD C.RAMER Special List 366 Christianity in Asia 2 RICHARDrichard c. C.RAMER ramer Old and Rare Books 225 east 70th street . suite 12f . new york, n.y. 10021-5217 Email [email protected] . Website www.livroraro.com Telephones (212) 737 0222 and 737 0223 Fax (212) 288 4169 March 16, 2020 Special List 366 Christianity in Asia Items marked with an asterisk (*) will be shipped from Lisbon. SATISFACTION GUARANTEED: All items are understood to be on approval, and may be returned within a reasonable time for any reason whatsoever. VISITORS BY APPOINTMENT special list 366 3 Special List 366 Christianity in Asia Wealth of Information on the Portuguese in the East 1. AGOSTINHO de Santa Maria, Fr. Historia da fundação do Real Convento de Santa Monica da Cidade de Goa, corte do Estado da India, & do Imperio Lusitano do Oriente …. Lisbon: Na Officina de Antonio Pedrozo Galram, 1699. 4°, contemporary limp vellum. Crisp and clean. In fine condition. Early ownership inscription in lower margin of title-page: “He livro he da libraria da Augustinhas descalsas.” (6 ll.), 819 pp. $3,500.00 FIRST EDITION. Nominally a history of an Augustinian convent founded in Goa in 1606, this important work is in fact much broader in scope: it gives a detailed history of Portuguese missions and missionaries, with a wealth of information on a wide variety of subjects relating to the Portuguese in the East. Among the biographies of persons associated with the Real Convento de Santa Monica is a lengthy one of D. Aleixo de Menezes, who was archbishop of Goa at the time of the convent’s foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer's Cooperatives in Portugal
    Pre-Print Version. For the final version of the chapter, please refer to: Freire, Dulce; Pereira, Joana Dias (2015), Consumer co-operatives in Portugal: debates and experiences from the 19th to the 20th century, in Mary Hilson, Silke Neunsinger and G. Patmore (Eds.), A Global History of Consumer Co-operation since 1850: movements and business, Leiden: Brill Publishers. Consumer co-operatives in Portugal: debates and experiences from the 19th to the 20th century Dulce Freire1 Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade de Lisboa (Institute of Social Sciences, University of Lisbon) Joana Dias Pereira2 Instituto de História Contemporânea, FCSH, Universidade Nova de Lisboa (Institute of Contemporary History, FSSH, New University of Lisbon) 1 This book chapter is part of the research project «Portuguese agriculture: food, development and sustainability (1870-2010)», funded by Fundação para Ciência e Tecnologia and that is being developed in ICS-Universidade de Lisboa (PTDC/HIS-HIS/122589/2010) [http://www.ruralportugal.ics.ul.pt]. 2 This book chapter is part of the PhD research project, funded by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia developed at FCSH- Universidade Nova de Lisboa (SFRH/BD/46634/2008), pursued in a post-doctoral project about civil society global history (SFRH/BPD/93482/2013). Introduction This chapter seeks to deepen the current state of knowledge concerning Portuguese consumer cooperatives. The analysis is focused on the period between the first legislation on co-operatives promulgated in 1867 and the fall of the dictatorship in 1974. Portugal is not considered an example of success in consumer co-operation. Instead, successive generations of co-operators have stressed the difficulties experienced in developing a sustainable and integrated co-operative movement.
    [Show full text]
  • PORTUGAL: COUNTRY REPORT to the FAO INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL CONFERENCE on PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES (Leipzig,1996)
    PORTUGAL: COUNTRY REPORT TO THE FAO INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL CONFERENCE ON PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES (Leipzig,1996) Prepared by: Ministry of Agriculture Oeiras, April 1995 PORTUGAL country report 2 Note by FAO This Country Report has been prepared by the national authorities in the context of the preparatory process for the FAO International Technical Conference on Plant Genetic Resources, Leipzig, Germany, 17-23 June 1996. The Report is being made available by FAO as requested by the International Technical Conference. However, the report is solely the responsibility of the national authorities. The information in this report has not been verified by FAO, and the opinions expressed do not necessarily represent the views or policy of FAO. The designations employed and the presentation of the material and maps in this document do not imply the expression of any option whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. PORTUGAL country report 3 Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO PORTUGAL AND ITS AGRICULTURAL SECTOR 5 1.1 SIZE AND LOCATION 5 1.2 PHYSIOGRAPHIC AND CLIMATIC FEATURES 5 1.3 HUMAN POPULATION 5 1.4 FARMING SYSTEMS 6 1.5 FOREIGN TRADE 7 1.6 FOREST TYPES 7 1.7 AGRICULTURAL SECTOR 9 1.8 MAJOR LOSSES 10 CHAPTER 2 INDIGENOUS PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES 11 2.1 FOREST GENETIC RESOURCES 11 2.1.1 Status of important species 11 2.1.2 Programmes and measures 12
    [Show full text]
  • A Short Guide to Invest in Agriculture in Portugal
    A SHORT GUIDE TO INVEST IN AGRICULTURE IN PORTUGAL INVEST IN AGRICULTURE INVEST IN PORTUGAL 4 TOPOGRAPHY 5 SOILS 6 CLIMATE 7 MAIN CROPS 12 PUBLIC IRRIGATION SCHEMES 14 OPPORTUNITIES FOR INVESTMENT 15 CREATE AN AGRICULTURAL COMPANY IN PORTUGAL 16 INCORPORATION OF A COMPANY IN PORTUGAL 18 PUBLIC SUPPORT SCHEMES 22 TAX SYSTEM 24 [email protected] e www.consulai.com EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIPS 26 w facebook.com/consulai fb DISPUTE RESOLUTION 28 www.vda.pt w VdA FINAL REMARKS 30 in 4 A SHORT GUIDE TO INVEST IN Agriculture IN PORTUGAL 5 INVEST IN AGRICULTURE TOPOGRAPHY INVEST IN PORTUGAL Despite the small size of the country, the greatly increased the potential for agriculture, topographic conditions are significantly but most of it was dryland. In the 90s, the Portugal is well known for its Mediterranean Altogether, this is why the exports of many different in the North, in the Centre or in the Alqueva dam was finally finished, developing climate, with warm and sunny summers, and Portuguese agriculture products, including fruits South of Portugal. The figure below shows this the largest artificial lake in Western Europe and a fresh breeze from the Atlantic coast. This, and vegetables, have increased around 10% very clearly. In the North, the slopes are steep. creating a potential to irrigate 170 thousand together with the availability of water resources, per year in recent years. And this is also why The landscape is dominated by forest and most hectares. In the last decade, this has been the are possibly the most important factors to so many external investors are looking at the of the properties are very small (less than 1 ha!).
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Agriculture- Poland and Portugal L a G U T R
    FARM SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE- POLAND AND PORTUGAL L A G U T R O Edited by P D N Edmund Lorencowicz A Fatima Baptista D N , Luis L. Silva A Jose R. Marques da Silva L O P - E R U Department of Machinery Exploitation T L and Management of Production Processes U C University of Life Sciences in Lublin, POLAND I R G A Department of Rural Engineering E School of Sciences and Technology L B University of Évora, PORTUGAL A N I A T ISBN 978-83-937433-1-5 S U Lublin - Évora 2014 S SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE – POLAND AND PORTUGAL EDITED BY EDMUND LORENCOWICZ FÁTIMA BAPTISTA LUIS L. SILVA JOSÉ R. MARQUES DA SILVA DEPARTMENT OF MACHINERY EXPLOITATION AND MANAGEMENT OF PRODUCTION PROCESSES UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES IN LUBLIN, POLAND DEPARTMENT OF RURAL ENGINEERING SCHOOL OF SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF ÉVORA, PORTUGAL LUBLIN-ÉVORA 2014 Papers from communications presented at the Workshop “Agriculture Sustainability, Poland-Portugal”, held in the University of Évora, Portugal, December, 2013. Reviewers: Ewa MATYJASZCZYK Plant Protection Institute NRI, Poznań, POLAND Vasco FITAS da CRUZ Universidade de Évora, DER/ECT and ICAAM, PORTUGAL Cover page: Jarosław Figurski Cover page photos: Jarosław Figurski, SDFG ISBN 978-83-937433-1-5 Printed by: Reprographic Centre, University of Life Sciences in Lublin 2 CONTENTS Contributors 5 Preface 7 Foreword 8 Notation 10 1. The evolution of the Portuguese agriculture in the context of 13 the European Union C. A. Marques 1.1. Introduction 13 1.2. Portuguese agriculture and agricultural policy background 14 1.3. Evolution of structural indicators of Portuguese agriculture 15 1.4.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Overview of the Portuguese Agriculture – Its Evolution
    A brief overview of the Portuguese Agriculture – Its evolution, performance and current situation Uma breve visão geral da Agricultura Portuguesa - A sua evolução, o desempenho e a situação atual Carlos Alberto Falcão Marques Évora University Abstract: In 2016 passes the thirty anniversary of the entrance of Portugal to the European Union, at the time the EEC (European Economic Community). This article is a brief and broad overview of the Portuguese agriculture and of its evolution, performance and current situation, within that temporal context. A characterization of Portuguese agriculture and its importance for the country is presented. Major factors that characterize its performance over recent times and the current situation, such as general and historical setting, climate and environment, agricultural structural and socio-economic characteristics, development of rural areas, trade balance, agricultural and rural development policies, are reviewed to give a broad perspective of its evolution. Keywords: Portugal; Agriculture; Rural development; Characteristics; Evolution. Resumo: No ano que vem, 2016, passam 30 anos sobre a adesão de Portugal à União Europeia, na altura a CEE (Comunidade Económica Europeia). Este artigo é uma breve apresentação geral da agricultura Portuguesa e da sua evolução, performance e situação actual, nesse contexto temporal. A agricultura Portuguesa e a sua importância para o país é caracterizada. Os principais factores que caracterizam a evolução da sua performance nesses anos e a situação actual, incluindo o enquadramento geral e histórico, o clima e o ambiente, as características estruturais e socio-económicas, o desenvolvimento das áreas rurais, o comércio internacional e as políticas agrícolas e de desenvolvimento rural, são revistos para fornecer uma perspectiva global da sua evolução.
    [Show full text]