Chapter-1 District Reporting System

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter-1 District Reporting System Chapter-1 District Reporting System Reporting of each health facility is to be submitted in DPHO by 7th of the following month. Each report should be complete, timely and consistent. The following Fig. shows the reporting status of different health facilities from FY 2070/71 to 2072/73. Fig.1 Reporting Status of different Health Facilities: 120 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 97 96 95 95 100 94 92 91 91 90 89 88 80 60 60 60 40 20 0 0 District Hospital PHCC Health Post PHC/ORC EPI Clinic FCHV Non Public Clinic HF 2070/71 2071/72 2072/73 Reporting status of District, PHCC, and HP is 100 % for all F/Y and the status of PHC/ORC and EPI clinic are like same as previous FY. The reporting status of Non Public Health facility is in increasing in trend and there is also problem of having complete report on time in regular basis. The reporting status of Bheri zonal hospital is 90% in this FY, it may need to be coordinated from regional and central level for regular reporting in newly revised HMIS formate. Table No: 1 Average Numbers of People Served by Health Facilities per day. FY PHCC HP PHC/ORC EPI FCHV 2070/71 47 34 29 24 38 2071/72 45 29 32 29 47 2072/73 36 21 28 32 40 Average number of people served by PHCC, HP, PHC/ORC and FCHV are in decreasing trend due to delay supply of HMIS tools which caused improper recording of service provided by Health faclity. In the same way this is due to improper management of health staffs. There are serious issues on management of inchargeship and work division within the staffs. Annual Report 2072/73 DPHO Banke Page 1 Chapter-2 National Immunization Programme 1. Background: The National Immunization Programme (NIP) is a high priority programme (P1) of Government of Nepal. Immunization is considered as one of the most cost-effective health interventions. NIP has helped in reducing the burden of vaccine preventable diseases (VPDs) and child mortality and has contributed in achieving the Millennium Development Goal (MDG4) on child mortality reduction. 2. GUIDING DOCUMENTS OF NATIONAL IMMUNIZATION PROGRAM 2.1.Nepal Health Sector Support Program- II (NHSP IP II): NHSP-2 focuses on increasing access and utilisation of essential health care services, especially to reduce disparities between the wealthier and the poor, vulnerable and marginalised populations. It has given high priority for immunization program. 2.2.Comprehensive Multi Years Plan of Action (2011- 2016) The comprehensive multi-year plan (cMYP) is a five years plan (2011-16) of national immunization program which includes the goal, objectives, strategies and activities are reflected with their time frame of implementation by the incurring costs of each activity. Each year review of cMYP is done and revision made so that the objectives mentioned could be met. The cMYP has been aligned with various policy documents on national immunization programs, the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), Global Immunization Vision and Strategy (GIVS) and World Health Assembly (WHAs) resolutions and lastly vaccine action plan. Goal, Objectives and milestones of cMYP 2011-2016 are as follows: 2.2.1. GOAL: To reduce child mortality, morbidity and disability associated with vaccine preventable diseases. 2.2.2. Objectives and strategies Objective 1: Achieve and maintain at least 90% vaccination coverage for all antigens at national and district level by 2016 Key Strategies: • Increase access and utilization to vaccination by implementing RED strategies in every district • Enhance human resources capacity for immunization management • Strengthen immunization monitoring system at all levels • Strengthen communication, social mobilization, and advocacy activities • Strengthen immunization services in the municipalities Objective 2: Ensure access to vaccines of assured quality and with appropriate waste management Key strategies: • Strengthen the vaccine management system at all levels Objective 3: Achieve and maintain polio free status Annual Report 2072/73 DPHO Banke Page 2 Key strategies: • Achieve and maintain high immunity levels against Polio by strengthening routine immunization and conducting high quality national polio immunization campaigns. • Respond adequately and timely to outbreak of poliomyelitis with appropriate vaccine • Achieve and maintain certification standard AFP surveillance Objective 4: Maintain maternal and neonatal tetanus elimination status Key strategies: • Achieve and maintain at least >80% TT2+ coverage for pregnant women in every districts • Conduct Td follow up campaigns in high risk districts • Expand school based immunization program • Continue surveillance of NT Objective 5: Initiate measles elimination Key strategies: • Achieve and sustain high population immunity to reduce measles incidence to elimination level • Investigate all suspected measles like outbreaks with program response • Use platform of measles elimination for Rubella / CRS control • Continue case-based measles surveillance Objective 6: Accelerate control of vaccine-preventable diseases through introduction of new and underused vaccines Key strategies: • Introduction of new and under-used vaccines (rubella, pneumococcal, typhoid, rota) based on disease burden and financial sustainability Objective 7: Strengthen and expand VPD surveillance Key strategies: • Expand VPD surveillance to include vaccine preventable diseases of public health concern. • Strengthen and expand laboratory support for surveillance. Objective 8: Continue to expand immunization beyond infancy Key strategies: • Consider for booster dose of currently used antigen based on evidence and protection of adult from potential VPDs. 3. TARGET POPULATION 3.1. Under 1 years of age for BCG, DPT-HepB-Hib, OPV, and Measles/ Rubella vaccine. 3.2. 12-23 months children for JE vaccine. 3.3. Pregnant women for Tetanus Toxoid containing (Td) vaccine. 4. NATIONAL IMMUNIZATION SCHEDULE. TABLE 2: Immunization Schedule Type of Vaccine Number of Doses Recommended Age BCG 1 At birth or on first contact with health institution OPV 3 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age IPV 1 14 weeks of age Annual Report 2072/73 DPHO Banke Page 3 DPT - Hep B-Hib 3 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age PCV 3 6,10 weeks and 9 months of age Measles- Rubella 2 9 and 15months of age Td 2 Pregnant women (2 doses of Td) JE 1 12-23 months of age 5. Logical tools for measuring major indicators of EPI program 푵풖풎풃풆풓 풐풇 풊풎풎풖풏풊풛풆풅 풄풉풊풍풅 1. Coverage percentage of antigen (BCG, DPT3, Measles and JE) = 푿 ퟏퟎퟎ 푻풂풓품풆풕 풑풐풑풖풍풂풕풊풐풏 풐풇 풊풎풎풖풏풊풛풆풅 풄풉풊풍풅 풏풖풎풃풆풓 풐풇 푫푷푻ퟏ 풊풎풎풖풏풊풛풆풅 풄풉풊풍풅−풏풖풎풃풆풓 풐풇 푫푷푻ퟑ 풊풎풎풖풏풊풛풆풅 풄풉풊풍풅 2. Dropout rate of DPT1 Vs. DPT3= 푿ퟏퟎퟎ 풏풖풎풃풆풓 풐풇 푫푷푻ퟏ 풊풎풎풖풏풊풛풆풅 풄풉풊풍풅 풏풖풎풃풆풓 풐풇 푩푪푮 풊풎풎풖풏풊풛풆풅 풄풉풊풍풅−풏풖풎풃풆풓 풐풇 푴풆풂풔풍풆풔 풊풎풎풖풏풊풛풆풅 풄풉풊풍풅 3. Dropout rate of BCG Vs. Measles = 푿ퟏퟎퟎ 풏풖풎풃풆풓 풐풇 푩푪푮 풊풎풎풖풏풊풛풆풅 풄풉풊풍풅 푵풖풎풃풆풓 풐풇푻푻ퟐ 풂풏풅 푻푻ퟐ+ 풊풎풎풖풏풊풛풆풅 풘풐풎풆풏 4. Coverage percentage of TT2 &TT2+ = 푿 ퟏퟎퟎ 푬풙풑풆풄풕풆풅 풑풓풆품풏풂풏풂풄풊풆풔 푵풖풎풃풆풓 풐풇 풗풂풄풄풊풏풆 풅풐풔풆풔 풆풙풑풆풏풅풊풕풖풓풆−푵풖풎풃풆풓 풐풇 풗풂풄풄풊풏풆풕풆풅 풄풉풊풍풅 풐풓 풘풐풎풆풏 5. Vaccine wastage rate = 푿 ퟏퟎퟎ 푵풖풎풃풆풓 풐풇 풗풂풄풄풊풏풆 풅풐풔풆풔 풆풙풑풆풏풅풊풕풖풓풆 6. Analysis of Service Statistics: Fig.2. DistrictCoverage of EPI Program FY 2069/70 to 2071/72: 120 2070/71 2071/72 2072/73 100 94 98 97 100 89 89 89 83 87 79 77 76 80 73 71 65 60 40 20 0 BCG DPT3/Polio3 Measles JE TT2 & TT2+ The above figure shows that all antigen coverage are decreased as compare to previous FY due to irregular antigen suply and impropor supervision and monitoring of EPI clinic operation and also incompatibility of target population. Table No. 3: Coverage of BCG, DPT III/Hep B III/Hib and Measles as HF wise: BCG DPT III/Hep B III/Hib Measles S.N. VDC/Municipality 2070/71 2071/72 2072/73 2070/71 2071/72 2072/73 2070/71 2071/72 2072/73 1 Bageswari 79 96 83 102 125 116 85 116 100 2 Belahari 117 144 132 108 151 127 107 151 133 3 Indarpur 83 96 67 79 104 67 75 77 68 4 Khajurakhurda 94 100 96 98 111 94 99 105 91 5 Radhapur 57 60 64 81 84 76 77 65 77 6 Banakatawa 84 81 77 81 91 77 81 89 70 7 Chisapani 83 67 61 83 74 70 76 74 76 8 Naubasta 78 95 68 83 101 74 87 96 70 9 Rajhena 47 169 182 50 130 116 47 139 113 10 Titihiriya 61 79 60 61 89 72 54 80 77 11 Kathkuiya 111 136 145 103 117 110 98 116 113 12 Laxmanpur 110 113 144 90 55 117 77 45 85 Annual Report 2072/73 DPHO Banke Page 4 BCG DPT III/Hep B III/Hib Measles S.N. VDC/Municipality 2070/71 2071/72 2072/73 2070/71 2071/72 2072/73 2070/71 2071/72 2072/73 13 Gangapur 94 103 106 102 97 97 88 98 93 14 Matahiya 106 109 91 84 91 78 73 83 68 15 Belbhar 78 74 69 79 76 77 85 67 51 16 Hirminiya 105 83 87 103 94 80 99 92 89 17 Jaispur 106 79 83 94 77 65 99 85 46 18 Paraspur 70 100 66 77 92 69 61 89 63 19 Piparhawa 83 85 82 85 76 59 85 79 61 20 Saigaun 106 99 99 113 103 99 109 105 85 21 Kachanapur 95 84 66 53 77 57 51 83 65 22 Khaskusma 85 74 72 91 86 79 80 82 61 23 Mahadevpuri 86 78 78 82 89 92 79 98 89 24 Kalaphata 90 102 80 74 72 65 56 55 38 25 Narainapur 144 146 148 123 174 139 120 143 142 26 Basudevapur 75 88 75 83 81 78 70 85 80 27 Kamdi 98 101 69 82 97 80 79 95 77 28 Khaskarkado 64 90 75 56 93 86 54 92 65 29 Nepalgung 16 188 190 16 118 90 14 85 80 30 Puraini 82 60 74 69 60 51 65 53 42 31 Bejapur 64 92 67 60 85 69 60 80 75 32 Binauna 70 87 78 64 91 82 63 80 80 33 Phattepur 81 86 84 69 88 71 62 76 63 34 Ganapur 92 125 120 101 114 98 111 78 106 35 Kohalpur 48 80 62 53 70 64 50 68 58 36 Manikapur 56 87 66 63 81 74 57 68 74 37 Shamsergunj 93 92 74 93 110 74 88 107 73 38 Raniyapur 87 98 88 73 100 87 89 100 87 39 Sitapur 78 91 67 87 106 85 88 94 89 40 Sonpur 107 101 86 113 92 87 121 75 99 41 Udharapur 99 91 79 64 93 69 53 75 57 42 Banakatti 97 81 79 87 75 62 77 63 61 43 Betahani 84 107 113 84 110 122 48 97 76 44 Bhawaniyapur 101 88 88 92 102 70 96 89 77 45 Holiya 104 72 89 103 77 86 83 94 79 46 Puraina 126 123 97 118 150 96 109 143 81 47 Udayapur 98 114 122 94 123 108 94 118 115 District Total 94 106 98 79 97 83 73 89 77 Table No.4: Coverage of JE, TT2 /TT2+ and dropout rate of DPT1 vs DPT3: JE TT2 & TT2+ Dropout Rate DPT1 Vs DPT3 S.N.
Recommended publications
  • Achham, Banke, Chitwan, and Pachthar Districts
    Technical Assistance Consultant’s Report Project Number: 44168-012 Capacity Development Technical Assistance (CDTA) October 2013 Nepal: Mainstreaming Climate Change Risk Management in Development (Financed by the Strategic Climate Fund) District Baseline Reports: Department of Roads (DOR) Achham, Banke, Chitwan, and Pachthar Districts Prepared by ICEM – International Centre for Environmental Management This consultant’s report does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB or the Government concerned, and ADB and the Government cannot be held liable for its contents. (For project preparatory technical assistance: All the views expressed herein may not be incorporated into the proposed project’s design. MOSTE | Mainstreaming climate change risk management in development | DoR District Baseline TA – 7984 NEP October, 2013 Mainstreaming Climate Change Risk Management in Development 1 Main Consultancy Package (44768-012) ACHHAM DISTRICT BASELINE: DEPARTMENT OF ROADS (DOR) Prepared by ICEM – International Centre for Environmental Management METCON Consultants APTEC Consulting Prepared for Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment, Government of Nepal Environment Natural Resources and Agriculture Department, South Asia Department, Asian Development Bank Version B i MOSTE | Mainstreaming climate change risk management in development | DoR District Baseline TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 ACHHAM DISTRICT ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 District Sector Master Plan ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Achhame, Banke, Chitwan, Kathmandu, and Panchthar Districts
    Technical Assistance Consultant’s Report Project Number: 44168-012 Capacity Development Technical Assistance (CDTA) October 2013 Nepal: Mainstreaming Climate Change Risk Management in Development (Financed by the Strategic Climate Fund) District Baseline Reports: Department of Local Infrastructure Development and Agricultural Roads (DOLIDAR) Achhame, Banke, Chitwan, Kathmandu, and Panchthar Districts Prepared by ICEM – International Centre for Environmental Management This consultant’s report does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB or the Government concerned, and ADB and the Government cannot be held liable for its contents. (For project preparatory technical assistance: All the views expressed herein may not be incorporated into the proposed project’s design. MOSTE | Mainstreaming climate change risk management in development | DoLIDAR District Baseline TA – 7984 NEP October, 2013 Mainstreaming Climate Change Risk Management in Development 1 Main Consultancy Package (44768-012) ACHHAM DISTRICT BASELINE: DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT & AGRICULTURAL ROADS (DOLIDAR) Prepared by ICEM – International Centre for Environmental Management METCON Consultants APTEC Consulting Prepared for Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment, Government of Nepal Environment Natural Resources and Agriculture Department, South Asia Department, Asian Development Bank Version B 1 MOSTE | Mainstreaming climate change risk management in development | DoLIDAR District Baseline TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 ACHHAM DISTRICT ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Study Report on "Comminity Based Organizations(Cbos): Landscape
    Community Based Organizations (CBOs): Landscape, Capacity Assessment and Strengthening Strategy Study Report Prepared for PLAN Nepal Lalitpur, Nepal July, 2005 Democratizing civil society at grassroots SAGUN P.O. Box 7802, Kathmandu, Nepal Phone: 977 4247920, Fax: 9771 4229544 Email: [email protected] Community Based Organizations (CBOs): Landscape, Capacity Assessment and Strengthening Strategy Mukta S. Lama Suresh Dhakal Lagan Rai Study Report Prepared for PLAN Nepal Lalitpur, Nepal July, 2005 SAGUN P.O. Box 7802, Kathmandu, Nepal Phone: 977 4247920, Fax: 9771 4229544 Email: [email protected] ii Acknowledgements This report is a result of contribution of many people in multiple ways. Foremost, we extend our deepest and heartfelt gratitude to members of Community Based Organizations across the districts for sharing us with their time, insight and experiences. The study benefited greatly from support and cooperation of the Plan field staff and partner agencies in Sunsari, Morang, Makwanpur, Rautahat, Bara, and Banke districts and the Regional Operational Support Unit teams. We would like to thank Ms. Chhing Lamu Sherpa, Mr. Kalbhan Rai, Dr. Chandra K. Sen, Mr. R. P. Gupta and Krishna Ghimire for their valuable inputs on the study. Dr. Chandi Chapagai, Plan Nepal Country Training Coordinator deserves special thanks for coordinating the whole exercise. We would like to express our deep appreciation to Shobhakar Vaidhya for his keen interest, insightful comments and his enthusiasm for incorporating the learning into the institutional policies and procedures. Thanks are also due to the Ms. Minty Pande, Country Director for her encouragement and comments. Similarly we very much appreciate the support of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal
    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal's 9 Minimum Characteristics of a Disaster Resilient Community
    Flagship 4 Handbook Nepal’s 9 Minimum Characteristics of a Disaster Resilient Community Published July 2013 Flagship 4: Integrated Community Based Disaster Risk Reduction/Management Flagship 4 is led by Government of Nepal’s Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development in partnership with the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies Flagship 4 is part of the Nepal Risk Reduction Consortium. An electronic version of this handbook can be downloaded from www.flagship4.nrrc.org.np The handbook is available in both English and Nepali Copies of the handbook and other documents can be obtained from IFRC’s Flagship 4 coordinator i Nepal’s 9 Minimum Characteristics Nepal’s 9 Minimum Characteristics of a Disaster Resilient Community of a Disaster Resilient Community About This Handbook Glossary of Terms Community Based Disaster Risk Reduction / Management Since the inception of the 9 minimum Handbook contents CBDRR/M characteristics of a disaster resilient community CDMC Community Disaster Management Committee in Nepal, there have been many questions Case studies by Government, implementing agencies, One attempt to provide guidance on DDC District Development Committee researchers, and community members on how operationalising the characteristics has DDMC District Disaster Management Committee to operationalise these characteristics. These been to collect a number of case studies questions have led to the formation of this from implementing agencies in Nepal. DDRC District Disaster Response Committee handbook which contains more information Each case study corresponds to a specific DEECC District Energy, Environment and Climate Change Division about each characteristic and examples of how characteristic and outlines how the they can be applied in interventions.
    [Show full text]
  • Ltzt Ul/Alsf Uxgtf -K|Ltzt Affs Nifd0fk'/, G/}Gfk'/, S7s'oof, Sfnfkmf6f
    1 2 lhNnfx?sf] ul/aLsf] b/, ul/aLsf] ljifdtf / ul/aLsf] uxgtf @)^* lhNnf uf=lj=;=sf gfd ul/aLsf b/ ul/aLsf ljifdtf ul/aLsf uxgtf -k|ltzt_ -k|ltzt_ -k|ltzt_ afFs nIfd0fk'/, g/}gfk'/, s7s'Oof, sfnfkmf6f 56.46(10.17) 16.88(4.71) 6.8(2.36) afFs kmQ]k'/, lagf}gf 39.35(10.08) 9.88(3.57) 3.53(1.55) afFs d6]lxof, u+ufk'/ 57.98(9.77) 17.65(4.76) 7.2(2.47) afFs a}hfk'/, vf;s'Zdf 33.01(9.93) 7.52(3.07) 2.49(1.22) afFs sGrgk'/ 25.26(8.58) 5.33(2.37) 1.67(0.88) afFs dxfb]jk'/L 18.17(7.47) 3.62(1.9) 1.1(0.67) afFs sf]xnk'/ 12.48(4.8) 2.59(1.25) 0.81(0.45) afFs /em]gf 10.56(4.91) 2.02(1.17) 0.59(0.4) afFs zD;]/u~h 28.96(8.92) 6.92(2.92) 2.4(1.23) afFs u+ufk'/ 41.53(10.17) 10.8(3.7) 3.96(1.64) afFs sDbL 37.03(9.74) 9.65(3.48) 3.57(1.54) afFs dlgsfk'/ 21.98(6.69) 5.21(2.09) 1.8(0.86) afFs ags66L 47.84(9.58) 13.46(4.05) 5.2(1.94) afFs a]txgL 58.1(10.14) 17.37(4.79) 6.98(2.42) afFs xf]lnof 66.99(9.02) 22.33(5.27) 9.66(2.96) afFs k'/}gL, pbok'/ k'/}gf 40.52(9.93) 10.57(3.7) 3.88(1.66) afFs a;'b]jk'/ 23.52(7.13) 5.36(2.11) 1.79(0.83) afFs vf;sf/sf+bf] 9.42(3.62) 1.97(0.96) 0.62(0.35) afFs lkk/xjf, ejfgLk'/ 34.43(9.16) 8.42(3.11) 2.96(1.32) afFs lxl/ldlgof 42.28(10.72) 10.85(3.92) 3.93(1.73) afFs ags6jf 19.47(7.35) 4.12(2.01) 1.31(0.76) afFs lr;fkfgL 18.44(6.32) 3.93(1.72) 1.26(0.65) afFs gf}j:tf 22.23(7.75) 4.8(2.18) 1.55(0.83) afFs l6l6lx/Lof 23.97(8.41) 5.15(2.4) 1.65(0.92) afFs /lgofk'/ 36.22(9.38) 9.01(3.39) 3.2(1.49) afFs l;tfk'/ 11.86(5.22) 2.34(1.28) 0.71(0.45) afFs ;f]gk'/ 36.36(9.79) 8.96(3.35) 3.16(1.43) afFs p9/fk'/ 37.83(10.01) 9.42(3.46) 3.35(1.48) afFs a]nef/, ;fOufpF 45.89(9.99) 12.47(4.01) 4.71(1.87) afFs k/;k'/ 27.7(8.75) 6.62(2.82) 2.3(1.18) afFs /fwfk'/ 5.57(3.21) 0.95(0.63) 0.26(0.2) afFs afu]Zj/L 8.67(3.98) 1.62(0.9) 0.47(0.3) afFs sh'/fv'b{, OGb|k'/, a]nx/L 34.1(8.42) 8.57(2.95) 3.08(1.28) afFs g]kfnu+h gu/kflnsf 9.65(3.35) 2.17(0.93) 0.73(0.36) gf]6 M sf]i7s -_ leq /x]sf] c+sn] ;DalGwt ;"rssf] e|dfz+ -k|ltzt_ nfO{ hgfpF5 .
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening the Role of Civil Society and Women in Democracy And
    HARIYO BAN PROGRAM Monitoring and Evaluation Plan 25 November 2011 – 25 August 2016 (Cooperative Agreement No: AID-367-A-11-00003) Submitted to: UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT NEPAL MISSION Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal Submitted by: WWF in partnership with CARE, FECOFUN and NTNC P.O. Box 7660, Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal First approved on April 18, 2013 Updated and approved on January 5, 2015 Updated and approved on July 31, 2015 Updated and approved on August 31, 2015 Updated and approved on January 19, 2016 January 19, 2016 Ms. Judy Oglethorpe Chief of Party, Hariyo Ban Program WWF Nepal Baluwatar, Kathmandu Subject: Approval for revised M&E Plan for the Hariyo Ban Program Reference: Cooperative Agreement # 367-A-11-00003 Dear Judy, This letter is in response to the updated Monitoring and Evaluation Plan (M&E Plan) for the Hariyo Program that you submitted to me on January 14, 2016. I would like to thank WWF and all consortium partners (CARE, NTNC, and FECOFUN) for submitting the updated M&E Plan. The revised M&E Plan is consistent with the approved Annual Work Plan and the Program Description of the Cooperative Agreement (CA). This updated M&E has added/revised/updated targets to systematically align additional earthquake recovery funding added into the award through 8th modification of Hariyo Ban award to WWF to address very unexpected and burning issues, primarily in four Hariyo Ban program districts (Gorkha, Dhading, Rasuwa and Nuwakot) and partly in other districts, due to recent earthquake and associated climatic/environmental challenges. This updated M&E Plan, including its added/revised/updated indicators and targets, will have very good programmatic meaning for the program’s overall performance monitoring process in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nepal Smallholder Irrigation Market Initiative (SIMI) WINROCK/IDE/CEAPRED/SAPPROS
    Increasing Rural Income through Micro Irrigation & Market Integration The Nepal Smallholder Irrigation Market Initiative (SIMI) WINROCK/IDE/CEAPRED/SAPPROS USAID Cooperative Agreement No. 367-A-00-03-00116-00 Nepal SIMI Annual (Fourth Quarter) Performance Report 2005 July 1, 2004 – June 30, 2005 (F.Y. 2004/5) Nepal SIMI Performance Report No. 8 Mailing Address GPO 8975, EPC 2560, Bakhundol, Lalitpur Tel: (977-1) 5535565 Fax: 5520846 E-mail: [email protected] Table of Contents 1.0 Background…………………………………………………………………………..1 1.1 SIMI goals………………………………………………………………………...2 1.2 Partners…………………………………………………………………………...2 2.0 Expected Results (Output or Indicators)……...……………………………………3 3.0 SIMI Indicator Target Performance………..……………………………….……..3 3.1 Activities………………………………………………………………………..5 3.1.1 Program Mobilization…………………………………………………5 3.1.2 Supply Chain Development……………………………………………5 3.1.3 Social Marketing……………………………………………………….7 3.1.4 Market Development…………………………………………………..7 3.1.5 Collaborative Partnerships and Linkages with Government……….8 3.1.6 Water Source Development…………………………………………...8 3.1.7 Gender Program……………………………………………………….8 3.1.8 Monitoring and Evaluation……………………………………………9 3.1.9 Success Stories………………………………………………………...10 3.1.10 Component wise Highlighted Program……………………………...18 3.2 Activities Planned for the Next Three Months……………………………...30 4.0 Statement of Work………………………………………………………………….31 5.0 Administrative Information………………………………………………………..31 6.0 Financial Information………………………………………………………………33 Annex A Nepal SIMI Project Areas…………………………………………………...34
    [Show full text]
  • TSLC PMT Result
    Page 62 of 132 Rank Token No SLC/SEE Reg No Name District Palika WardNo Father Mother Village PMTScore Gender TSLC 1 42060 7574O15075 SOBHA BOHARA BOHARA Darchula Rithachaupata 3 HARI SINGH BOHARA BIMA BOHARA AMKUR 890.1 Female 2 39231 7569013048 Sanju Singh Bajura Gotree 9 Gyanendra Singh Jansara Singh Manikanda 902.7 Male 3 40574 7559004049 LOGAJAN BHANDARI Humla ShreeNagar 1 Hari Bhandari Amani Bhandari Bhandari gau 907 Male 4 40374 6560016016 DHANRAJ TAMATA Mugu Dhainakot 8 Bali Tamata Puni kala Tamata Dalitbada 908.2 Male 5 36515 7569004014 BHUVAN BAHADUR BK Bajura Martadi 3 Karna bahadur bk Dhauli lawar Chaurata 908.5 Male 6 43877 6960005019 NANDA SINGH B K Mugu Kotdanda 9 Jaya bahadur tiruwa Muga tiruwa Luee kotdanda mugu 910.4 Male 7 40945 7535076072 Saroj raut kurmi Rautahat GarudaBairiya 7 biswanath raut pramila devi pipariya dostiya 911.3 Male 8 42712 7569023079 NISHA BUDHa Bajura Sappata 6 GAN BAHADUR BUDHA AABHARI BUDHA CHUDARI 911.4 Female 9 35970 7260012119 RAMU TAMATATA Mugu Seri 5 Padam Bahadur Tamata Manamata Tamata Bamkanda 912.6 Female 10 36673 7375025003 Akbar Od Baitadi Pancheswor 3 Ganesh ram od Kalawati od Kalauti 915.4 Male 11 40529 7335011133 PRAMOD KUMAR PANDIT Rautahat Dharhari 5 MISHRI PANDIT URMILA DEVI 915.8 Male 12 42683 7525055002 BIMALA RAI Nuwakot Madanpur 4 Man Bahadur Rai Gauri Maya Rai Ghodghad 915.9 Female 13 42758 7525055016 SABIN AALE MAGAR Nuwakot Madanpur 4 Raj Kumar Aale Magqar Devi Aale Magar Ghodghad 915.9 Male 14 42459 7217094014 SOBHA DHAKAL Dolakha GhangSukathokar 2 Bishnu Prasad Dhakal
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Submitted to USAID So the Details of Those Activities Are Not Reported Here
    From Combatants to Peacemakers Program Project Final Report October, 2015 to March 31, 2017 Award No: AID-367-F-15-00002 Under USAID/DCHA/CMM APS-OAA-14-000003 Submitted to: United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Democracy and Governance Office Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal Tel: +977-01-42340000 Submitted by: Forum for Protection of Public Interest (Pro Public) Gautambuddha Marg, Anamnagar P.O.Box: 14307 Telephone: +977-01-4268681, 4265023 Fax: +977-01-4268022 1 Disclaimer: All these activities were made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of Pro Public and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. 2 Abbreviations BC Brahmin Chhetri CBO Community Based Organization CDO Chief District Officer CPN Communist Party of Nepal CSO Civil Society Organization DDC District Development Committee DF Dialogue facilitation ECs Ex-Combatants FGD Focus Group Discussion GESI Gender and Social Inclusion GIZ Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH KII Key Informant Interview LPC Local Peace Committee NC Nepali Congress NPTF Nepal Peace Trust Fund OCA Organizational Capacity Assessment OPI Organizational Performance Index PLA People Liberation Army Pro Public Forum for the Protection of Public Interest SDG Social Dialogue Group STPP Strengthening the Peace Process UCPN United Communist Party of Nepal UML United Marxist Leninist UNDP United Nations Development Program USAID United States Agency for International Development VDC Village Development Committee WCF Ward Citizen Forum 3 Acknowledgement This project completion report covers the overall implementation of the USAID-funded Combatants to Peacemakers (C2P) project (October 2015 to March 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Lucknow Zone CSC List.Xlsx
    Lucknow Zone CSC List Sl. Grampanchayat District Block Name Village/CSC name Pincode Location VLE Name Contact No No. Village Name 1 Sultanpur Sultanpur4 JAISINGHPUR(R) 228125 ISHAQPUR DINESH ISHAQPUR 730906408 2 Sultanpur Baldirai Bhawanighar 227815 Bhawanighar Sarvesh Kumar Yadav 896097886 3 Hardoi HARDOI1 Madhoganj 241301 Madhoganj Bilgram Road Devendra Singh Jujuvamau 912559307 4 Balrampur Balrampur BALRAMPUR(U) 271201 DEVI DAYAL TIRAHA HIMANSHU MISHRA TERHI BAZAR 912594555 5 Sitapur Sitapur Hargaon 261121 Hargaon ashok kumar singh Mumtazpur 919283496 6 Ambedkar Nagar Bhiti Naghara 224141 Naghara Gunjan Pandey Balal Paikauli 979214477 7 Gonda Nawabganj Nawabganj gird 271303 Nawabganj gird Mahmood ahmad 983850691 8 Shravasti Shravasti Jamunaha 271803 MaharooMurtiha Nafees Ahmad MaharooMurtiha 991941625 9 Badaun Budaun2 Kisrua 243601 Village KISRUA Shailendra Singh 5835005612 10 Badaun Gunnor Babrala 243751 Babrala Ajit Singh Yadav Babrala 5836237097 11 Bareilly Bareilly2 Bareilly Npp(U) 243201 TALPURA BAHERI JASVEER GIR Talpura 7037003700 12 Bareilly Bareilly3 Kyara(R) 243001 Kareilly BRIJESH KUMAR Kareilly 7037081113 13 Bareilly Bareilly5 Bareilly Nn 243003 CHIPI TOLA MAHFUZ AHMAD Chipi tola 7037260356 14 Bareilly Bareilly1 Bareilly Nn(U) 243006 DURGA NAGAR VINAY KUMAR GUPTA Nawada jogiyan 7037769541 15 Badaun Budaun1 shahavajpur 243638 shahavajpur Jay Kishan shahavajpur 7037970292 16 Faizabad Faizabad5 Askaranpur 224204 Askaranpur Kanchan ASKARANPUR 7052115061 17 Faizabad Faizabad2 Mosodha(R) 224201 Madhavpur Deepchand Gupta Madhavpur
    [Show full text]
  • POPULATION STATUS and HABITAT SUITABILITY of SARUS CRANE (Antigone Antigone, Linnaeus, 1758) in BANKE DISTRICT, NEPAL
    POPULATION STATUS AND HABITAT SUITABILITY OF SARUS CRANE (Antigone antigone, Linnaeus, 1758) IN BANKE DISTRICT, NEPAL SHRADDHA TIWARI T.U. Registration No. 5-1-33-471-2005 T.U. Examination Roll No: 050 Batch: 2070/2071 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Master of Science in Zoology with special paper Ecology and Environment. Submitted to Central Department of Zoology Institute of Science and Technology Tribhuvan University Kirtipur, Kathmandu Nepal December, 2016 DECLARATION I hereby declare that the work presented in this thesis has been done by myself, and has not been submitted elsewhere for the award of any degree. All sources of information have been specifically acknowledged by references to the author(s) or institution(s). ……………………… Date: ................................. Ms. Shraddha Tiwari i TRIBHUVAN UNIVERSITY CENTRAL DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal RECOMMENDATION This is to recommend that the thesis entitled “POPULATION STATUS AND HABITAT SUITABILITY OF SARUS CRANE (Antigone antigone, Linnaeus 1758) IN BANKE DISTRICT, NEPAL” has been carried out by Ms. Shraddha Tiwari for the partial fulfillment of Master’s Degree of Science in Zoology with special paper Ecology and Environment. This is her original work and has been carried out under my supervision. To the best of our knowledge, this thesis work has not been submitted for any other degree in any institutions. Date:-………………………………. ………………………………….. Supervisor Nanda Bahadur Singh, PhD Professor Central Department of Zoology Tribhuvan University ii TRIBHUVAN UNIVERSITY CENTRAL DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal RECOMMENDATION This is to recommend that the thesis entitled “POPULATION STATUS AND HABITAT SUITABILITY OF SARUS CRANE (Antigone antigone, Linnaeus 1758) IN BANKE DISTRICT, NEPAL” has been carried out by Ms.
    [Show full text]