DOCSLIB.ORG

Safranbolu Havzasi (Karabük) Eosen Yaşli Çökellerin Foraminifer Biyostratigrafisi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Safranbolu Havzasi (Karabük) Eosen Yaşli Çökellerin Foraminifer Biyostratigrafisi SAFRANBOLU HAVZASI (KARABÜK) EOSEN YAŞLI ÇÖKELLERİN FORAMİNİFER BİYOSTRATİGRAFİSİ Jeo Müh. Derya SİNANOĞLU Yükseklisans Tezi Jeoloji Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı Danışman: Yrd. Doç. Dr. Meral KAYA ŞUBAT-2012 T.C. FIRAT ÜNİVERSİTESİ FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ SAFRANBOLU HAVZASI (KARABÜK) EOSEN YAŞLI ÇÖKELLERİN FORAMİNİFER BİYOSTRATİGRAFİSİ YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ Jeo Müh. Derya SİNANOĞLU (091116102) Tezin Enstitüye Verildiği Tarih: 19 Ocak 2012 Tezin Savunulduğu Tarih: 24 Şubat 2012 Tez Danışmanı: Yrd. Doç. Dr. Meral KAYA (A.Ü) Diğer Jüri Üyeleri: Prof. Dr. Mehmet ÖNAL (İ.Ü) Yrd. Doç. Dr. K. Kadir ERİŞ (F.Ü) Yrd. Doç. Dr. Calibe KOÇ TAŞGIN (F.Ü) ŞUBAT-2012 ÖNSÖZ Bu tezin hazırlanmasında bana her türlü yardım ve kolaylığı gösteren danışman hocam Sayın Yrd. Doç. Dr. Meral Kaya Çağlar’a teşekkür ederim. Bu çalışmanın hazırlanması esnasında çalışma alanı ile ilgili eksik verileri sağlamama yardımcı olan ve aynı zamanda önerileriyle bana yol gösteren Prof. Dr. Muhittin Görmüş, Prof. Dr. Yaşar Eren, Prof. Dr. Ahmet Şaşmaz ve katkılarından dolayı Yrd. Doç. Dr. Calibe Koç Taşgın’a sonsuz teşekkür ederim. Meslek hayatım boyunca örnek alacağım, bana verdiği destek ve katkılarından dolayı saygıdeğer hocam Prof. Dr. Mehmet Önal’a çok teşekkür ederim. Tez çalışmalarım sırasında her konuda yardımlarını benden esirgemeyen sevgili arkadaşlarım Hicran İpek, Serpil Özer, Zeynep Baytaşoğlu ve Melek Sinanoğlu’na teşekkür ederim. Hayatımın her aşamasında yanımda olan, maddi ve manevi desteklerini hiçbir zaman esirgemeyen aileme içtenlikle teşekkürü borç bilirim. Derya SİNANOĞLU ELAZIĞ-2012 II İÇİNDEKİLER Sayfa No ÖNSÖZ ................................................................................................................................ II İÇİNDEKİLER ................................................................................................................. III ÖZET ................................................................................................................................... V SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ VI LEVHA LİSTESİ ............................................................................................................ VII ŞEKİLLER LİSTESİ ...................................................................................................... VII ÇİZELGELER LİSTESİ ............................................................................................... VIII 1. GİRİŞ ........................................................................................................... 1 2. ÖNCEKİ ÇALIŞMALAR .......................................................................... 3 2.1. İnceleme Alanı İle ilgili Çalışmalar .............................................................. 3 2.2. Eosen Bentik Foraminifer Sistematiği ile İlgili Çalışmalar .......................... 5 3. METERYAL VE METOD ......................................................................... 9 3.1. Meteryal ........................................................................................................ 9 3.2. Metod ........................................................................................................... 10 3.2.1. Literatür Taraması ........................................................................................ 10 3.2.2. Arazi Çalışmaları ......................................................................................... 10 3.2.3. Laboratuvar Çalışmaları ............................................................................... 10 3.2.3.1. Yıkama Örnekleri ......................................................................................... 10 3.2.3.2. Sert Kaya İnce Kesit Alımları ...................................................................... 11 3.2.3.3. İri Bentik Foraminifer İnce Kesit Alımları .................................................. 11 3.2.4. Büro Çalışmaları .......................................................................................... 12 4. BULGULAR VE TARTIŞMA .................................................................. 13 4.1. Çalışma Alanı Ve Yakın Çevresinin Jeolojisi ............................................. 13 4.1.1. Genel Jeoloji ................................................................................................ 13 4.1.2. Stratigrafi ..................................................................................................... 15 4.1.2.1. Ulus Formasyonu (Üku ) ............................................................................. 15 4.1.2.2 Safranbolu Formasyonu (Ts) ....................................................................... 20 4.1.2.3 Karabük Formasyonu (Tk) ........................................................................... 23 4.1.2.4 Çerçen Formasyonu (Tç) ............................................................................. 24 4.1.2.5 Soğanlı Formasyonu (Tso) ........................................................................... 25 III 4.1.2.6 Akçapınar Formasyonu (Ta) ........................................................................ 26 4.1.2.7 Yörük Formasyonu (Tör) ............................................................................. 27 4.1.2.8 Yamaç Molozu (Ymo) ................................................................................. 27 4.1.2.9 Alüvyon (Qal) .............................................................................................. 27 4.2. Paleontolojik Bulgular ................................................................................. 28 4.2.1. Bentik Foraminifer Dağılımı ........................................................................ 30 4.3. Ölçülü Stratigrafik Kesitler .......................................................................... 32 4.3.1. ÖSK1 (Eskipazar K’yi) ................................................................................ 32 4.3.2. ÖSK2 (Eskipazar GB’sı) ............................................................................. 35 4.3.3. ÖSK3 (Bartın-Karabük Yol Ayrımı) ........................................................... 37 4.3.4. ÖSK4 (Ağaçkese) ........................................................................................ 39 4.4. Biyostratigrafi .............................................................................................. 41 4.4.1. Bentik Foraminifer Biyostratigtafisi ............................................................ 42 4.4.1.1. SBZ: 15 Biyozonu (Orta Lütesiyen 2) ......................................................... 42 4.4.1.2. SBZ: 16 Biyozonu (Geç Lütesiyen): ............................................................ 44 4.5. Ortamsal Yorum ........................................................................................... 44 4.6. Sistematik Tanımlamalar ............................................................................. 45 4.6.1. Bentik Foraminifer Sistematiği .................................................................... 45 5. SONUÇLAR ............................................................................................... 56 KAYNAKLAR ........................................................................................... 57 ÖZGEÇMİŞ ................................................................................................ 62 LEVHALAR ............................................................................................... 63 IV ÖZET Çalışma alanı, Karabük ilinin Safranbolu ilçesi civarında bulunan Safranbolu Havzası’nda yer almaktadır. Çalışma alanı ve yakın çevresinde, yaşlıdan gence doğru, Ulus Formasyonu (Üku), Safranbolu Formasyonu (Ts), Karabük Formasyonu (Ta), Çerçen Formasyonu (Tç), Soğanlı Formasyonu (Tso), Akçapınar Formasyonu (Ta), Yörük Formasyonu (Tör), Yamaç Molozu (Ymo) ve Alüvyon (Qa) bulunmaktadır. Yapılan araştırmada, 4 stratigrafik kesit ölçülerek, bu kesitlere ait bol fosilli ve ayrışmış tabakalardan örnekler alınmıştır. Bu örneklerde 250 adet ince kesit yapılmış ve bu ince kesitlerin mikroskobik incelemesi sonucu Orta-Geç Lütesiyen’i karakterize eden 6 cins ve 11 tür tayin edilmiştir. Tanımlanan bu cins ve türler şunlardır: Alveolina gr. elliptica Sowerby, Assilina exponens (Sowerby), Discocylina cf. harrisoni Vaughan, Nummulites aturicus Joly ve Leymerie, N. burdigalensis de la Harpe, N. cf. discorbinus Schaub, N. millecaput Boubée, N. praeaturicus Schaub, Rotalia sp. Lamarck ve Orbitolites sp. Lamarck. Tayin edilen bu bentik foraminiferlere dayanılarak SBZ 15 ve SBZ 16 biyozonları ayırtlanmıştır. İnceleme alanındaki birimlerin litolojik özellikleri ve bentik foraminifer içeriklerinin değerlendirilmesi sonucu şelf ortamında çökeldiği belirlenmiştir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Bentik, biyostratigrafi, biyozon, Lütesiyen, Safranbolu Havzası V SUMMARY SAFRANBOLU BASIN (KARABUK) FORAMINIFERAL BIOSTRATIGRAPHY EOCENE SEDIMENTS The study area is situated in Safranbolu Basin of around the Karabük city’s Safranbolu. Study area and its surroundings, to elderly, young, Ulus Formation (Üku), Safranbolu Formation (Ts), Karabük Formation (Ta), Çerçen Formation (Tç), Soğanlı Formation (Tso), Akçapınar Formation (Ta), Yörük Formation (Tör ), Slope Debris (Ymo), Alluvium (Qa) are available. In this survey, 4 measured stratigraphic section, the cross-sections taken from samples of the fossiliferous layers and dissociated. These examples made of 250 thin sections, and microscopic examination of thin sections as a result of these 6 genera and 11 species that characterize
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Edge of Sakarya Plain Subregions: the West
    Odonatologica38(4): 293-306 December 1, 2009 Odonata of the Western Black Sea Region of Turkey, with taxonomic notes and species list of the region N. Hacet Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Trakya University, TR-22030 Edirne, Turkey [email protected] Received January 26, 2009 / Revised and Accepted July 14, 2009 40 spp./sspp. from 58 localities were recorded during 2003 and 2005-2007. Sym- lindenii Somatochlora meridionalis, Orthetrum pecmafusca, Erythromma , albistylum and Sympetrum pedemontanum are new for the region. S. meridionalis records are the within its distribution of other is dis- easternmost range. Geographical some spp. cussed, and notes on the morphology and taxonomic status of the regional Calop- The teryx splendens, C. virgo, Ischnura elegans and Cordulegaster insignisareprovided. distributions of Coenagrionpulchellum, C. scitulum, Pyrrhosoma n. nymphula, Aesh- na cyanea, Cordulia aeneaand Sympetrum depressiusculum in Turkey are still largely unknown. Based on all available records, a list of the 51 spp./sspp. currently known from the Western Black Sea Region is presented. INTRODUCTION The Black Sea Region extends from the eastern edge of Sakarya plain in the West, to Georgia in the East. It is divided in three subregions: the West, Centre and East (Fig. 1). The Western Black Sea Region studied extends from the East of Sakarya plain and Bilecik province to the West of the Ktzihrmak delta. It in- cludes the northernparts of Ankara and Cankm provinces, and the eastern parts of Sakarya and Bilecik provinces (Fig.l). Physically, the North Anatolianmountainsextend in East-West direction and cut rich water such brooks and are by sources, as streams, ponds.
    [Show full text]
  • Treasures of Eastern Turkey Easternturkeytours
    Eastern Turkey Tours Treasures of Eastern Turkey Exceed your expectations Email: [email protected] Nemrut Day 1: CAPPADOCIA KAHTA (Nemrut) We leave the Land of Beautiful Horses and weird rock formations and head out across Turkey's hinterland, along the ancient Silk Road via Kayseri and stopping at the great Karatay Han before proceeding to Adiyaman. Overnight near Nemrut Day 2: KAHTA - URFA Today we visit the magnificent funerary monument at the peak of Mt Nemrut which stands as a testament to an ancient king's ambition. From Nemrut we continue to the massive Ataturk Dam straddling the mighty river Euphrates, and on to Urfa, the ancient The Pools of Abraham city of prophets. Ancient footprints truly mark this part of Turkey; Urfa was the birthplace of the biblical patriarch Abraham. We will visit the cave and shrine where tradition tells us Abraham was born. Nearby are the sacred pools of Abraham filled with sacred carp that are fed by the many pilgrims who visit this holy site. Overnight in Urfa. Day 3: URFA DIYARBAKIR We depart Urfa and proceed to the on-going archaeological dig at Gobekli Tepe. Although not widely known amongst the general public Gobekli Tepe is probably one of the most important archaeological sites in the world From Gobekli Tepe, Hill of the Navel, this site represents a major shift in our understanding of One of the many carved megaliths forming the man's early history. Here lie the remains of the earliest religious chambers structures built by man yet to be discovered and at about 11000- 13000 years old pre-dates pottery, writing, Stonehenge and the Pyramids.
    [Show full text]
  • Karabük İli Çevresel Durum Raporu
    Sayfa İÇİNDEKİLER No (A)KARABÜK İLİ ÇEVRESEL DURUM DEĞERLENDİRMESİ BÖLÜM I 2 COĞRAFİ KAPSAM 2 1.1 Karabük İli Coğrafi Durumu 3 1.2. Karabük İli Topoğrafyası 4 1.3. İklim 7 1.4. Ormanlar, Çayır ve Meralar 8 BÖLÜM II 9 SU/ATIKSU 9 2.1. SU KAYNAKLARI 9 2.1.1. İçme Suyu Kaynakları ve Barajlar 9 2.1.2. Yeraltı Su Kaynakları 9 2.1.3. Akarsular 9 2.1.4. Göller ve Göletler 10 2.2. SU KAYNAKLARININ KULLANIMI 11 2.3. SU KAYNAKLARININ DURUMU 12 2.3.1. İçme suyu kaynaklarında mevcut durum 12 2.3.2. Akarsularda Mevcut durum 27 2.4. ATIK SU SİSTEMİ, KANALİZASYON 30 2.5. KARABÜK İLİNDE SU KİRLİLİĞİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ 37 BÖLÜM III 56 HAVA 56 3.1. ISINMADA KULLANILAN YAKITLAR 56 3.2.KARABÜK İLİ SANAYİ GRUPLANDIRILMASI 56 3.3. TRAFİKTEN KAYNAKLANAN EMİSYONLAR 64 3.4. HAVAYI KİRLETİCİ GAZLAR VE KAYNAKLARI 65 3.5.1. Partikül Madde (PM) ve SO2 Emisyonları 65 3.5. KARABÜK İLİNDE HAVA KİRLİLİĞİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ 67 BÖLÜM IV 69 TOPRAK 69 4.1. KARABÜK İLİNDE PESTİSİT KULLANIMI 73 4.2 KARABÜK İLİNDE TOPRAK KİRLİLİĞİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ 74 BÖLÜM V 78 ATIKLAR 78 5.1. KATI ATIKLAR 78 5.1.1. Ambalaj Atıkları 78 5.1.2. Tehlikeli Atıklar 81 5.1.3. Tıbbi Atıklar 82 5.1.4. Pil ve Aküler 83 5.1.5. Bitkisel Atık Yağlar 84 5.2 KATI ATIKLARIN DEPOLANMASI 84 5.3 KARABÜK İLİNDEKİ ATIK DURUMU VE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ 88 (B) BARTIN İLİ ÇEVRESEL DURUM DEĞERLENDİRMESİ BÖLÜM I 94 COĞRAFİ KAPSAM 94 1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ankara & Central Anatolia
    ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd Ankara & Central Anatolia Includes ¨ Why Go? Ankara ............. 411 Somewhere between the cracks in the Hittite ruins, the Safranbolu ......... 423 fissures in the Phyrgian burial mounds and the scratches Boğazkale, Hattuşa in the Seljuk caravanserais, the mythical, mighty Turks & Yazılıkaya .........427 raced across this highland steppe with big ideas and bigger Alacahöyük ........ 432 swords. Alexander the Great cut that eponymous knot in Gordian where King Midas displayed his deft golden touch. Çorum ............ 432 Julius Caesar came, saw and conquered, and in Konya, the Amasya ........... 433 whirling dervishes first spun. This central sweep of Turkey Tokat ...............437 was also where Atatürk forged his secular revolution along Sivas ..............440 dusty Roman roads that all lead to Ankara; an underrated capital city and geopolitical centre. Further north through Konya ............. 442 the nation’s fruit bowl, in Safranbolu and Amasya, ‘Otto- mania’ is still in full swing; here wealthy weekenders come to capture a glimmer of a bygone age amid bendy-beamed mansions. Central Anatolia is the meeting point between Best Places to Eat the fabled past and the present – a sojourn here will enlighten and enchant. ¨ Atış Cafe (p426) ¨ Somatçi (p448) ¨ Sema Hanımın Yeri (p442) When to Go Ankara ¨ Balıkçıköy (p418) °C/°F Te mp Rainfall Inches/mm 40/104 5/125 30/86 4/100 20/68 Best Places to 3/75 Sleep 10/50 2/50 ¨ Kahveciler Konağı (p426) 0/32 1/25 -10/14 ¨ Teşup Konak (p436) -20/-4 0 ¨ Hich Hotel (p447) J FDM A M J J A S O N ¨ Deeps Hostel (p417) May–Jun Fruit Jul–Aug Join sum- Dec Konya’s ¨ Derviş Otel (p447) harvest: cherries mer’s crowds of Mevlâna Festival is the size of a baby’s Turkish tourists in a Sufi spectacular fist, apricots the Ottoman towns of extraordinary sweeter than a of Safranbolu and human spirit.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Classification of the Turkish Terranes and Sutures and Its Implication for the Paleotectonic History of the Region
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Tectonophysics 451 (2008) 7–39 www.elsevier.com/locate/tecto A new classification of the Turkish terranes and sutures and its implication for the paleotectonic history of the region ⁎ Patrice Moix a, , Laurent Beccaletto b, Heinz W. Kozur c, Cyril Hochard a, François Rosselet d, Gérard M. Stampfli a a Institut de Géologie et de Paléontologie, Université de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland b BRGM, Service GEOlogie / Géologie des Bassins Sédimentaires, 3 Av. Cl. Guillemin - BP 36009, FR-45060 Orléans Cedex 2, France c Rézsü u. 83, H-1029 Budapest, Hungary d IHS Energy, 24, chemin de la Mairie, CH-1258 Perly, Switzerland Received 15 October 2007; accepted 6 November 2007 Available online 14 December 2007 Abstract The Turkish part of the Tethyan realm is represented by a series of terranes juxtaposed through Alpine convergent movements and separated by complex suture zones. Different terranes can be defined and characterized by their dominant geological background. The Pontides domain represents a segment of the former active margin of Eurasia, where back-arc basins opened in the Triassic and separated the Sakarya terrane from neighbouring regions. Sakarya was re-accreted to Laurasia through the Balkanic mid-Cretaceous orogenic event that also affected the Rhodope and Strandja zones. The whole region from the Balkans to the Caucasus was then affected by a reversal of subduction and creation of a Late Cretaceous arc before collision with the Anatolian domain in the Eocene. If the Anatolian terrane underwent an evolution similar to Sakarya during the Late Paleozoic and Early Triassic times, both terranes had a diverging history during and after the Eo-Cimmerian collision.
    [Show full text]
  • Ankara & Central Anatolia
    ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd Ankara & Central Anatolia Why Go? Ankara . .397 Somewhere between the cracks in the Hittite ruins, the fi s- Gordion . .410 sures in the Phyrgian burial mounds and the scratches in Beypazarı . 411 the Seljuk caravanserais, the mythical, mighty Turks raced across this highland desert steppe with big ideas and bad- Safranbolu . 411 ass swords. Nearby, Alexander the Great cut the Gordion Kastamonu . .418 knot, King Midas displayed his deft golden touch and Ju- Boğazkale, Hattuşa lius Caesar came, saw and conquered. Atatürk forged his & Yazılıkaya . 420 secular revolution along dusty Roman roads that all lead Çorum . 425 to Ankara, an underrated capital city and geo-political Amasya . 426 centre. Further north through the nation’s fruitbowl, in Safranbolu and Amasya, ‘Ottomania’ is still in full swing. Tokat . 430 Here wealthy weekenders sip çay with time-rich locals who Sivas . 433 preside over dark timber mansions. Central Anatolia is the Divriği . 438 meeting point between the fabled past and the prosperous Konya . 438 present – a sojourn here will enlighten and enchant. Karaman . .447 Binbirkilise. 448 When to Go Best Places to Stay Ankara » Gül Evi (p414) °C/°F Te m p Rainfall Inches/mm » Angora House Hotel 40/104 5/125 (p 404 ) 30/86 4/100 20/68 » Gordion Hotel (p405) 3/75 10/50 » Emin Efendi Konağı 2/50 0/32 (p 429 ) 1/25 -10/14 » Cinci Hanı (p 414 ) -20/-4 0 J FDNOSAJJMAM Best Places to Eat May/June Fruit June Summer December The » Taşev (p 416 ) harvest : cher- storms light up Mevlâna Festival ries the size of a the twin Ottoman in Konya is a Sufi » Balıkçıköy (p 405 ) baby’s fist, apri- towns of Safran- spectacular of » Le Man Kültür (p 406 ) cots sweeter than bolu and Amasya.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Identity and Tourism Impact Assesment
    THE IMPACT OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT IN SAFRANBOLU A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF THE MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY SĠBEL AKPINAR KASAP IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF CITY AND REGIONAL PLANNING IN THE DEPARTMENT OF CITY AND REGIONAL PLANNING JANUARY 2011 Approval of the thesis: THE IMPACT OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT IN SAFRANBOLU submitted by Sibel AKPINAR KASAP in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of City and Regional Planning in City and Regional Planning Department, Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Canan ÖZGEN _____________________ Dean, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Prof. Dr. Melih ERSOY _____________________ Head of Department, City and Regional Planning Assoc. Prof. Dr. Gülden BERKMAN _____________________ Supervisor, City and Regional Planning Dept., METU Assoc. Prof. Dr. C. Nil UZUN _____________________ Co-Supervisor, City and Regional Planning Dept., METU Examining Committee Members: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Serap KAYASÜ _____________________ City and Regional Planning Dept., METU Assoc. Prof. Dr. Gülden BERKMAN _____________________ City and Regional Planning Dept., METU Assoc. Prof. Dr. H. Tarık ġENGÜL _____________________ Political Science and Public Administration Dept., METU Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ela BABALIK SUTCLIFFE _____________________ City and Regional Planning Dept., METU Assist. Prof. Dr. Ġsmail TANER _____________________ City and Regional Planning Dept., Abant Izzet Baysal Uni. Date: 27.01.2011 I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work.
    [Show full text]
  • An Example of Tick-Crimean Congo Hemorrhagic Fever (CCHF) in Eflani District, Karabuk, Turkey
    Scientific Research and Essays Vol. 6(11), pp. 2395-2402, 4 June, 2011 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/SRE DOI: 10.5897/SRE11.574 ISSN 1992-2248 ©2011 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper An example of tick-Crimean Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) in Eflani district, Karabuk, Turkey Guzin Kanturk Yigit Department of Geography, Faculty of Literature, Karabuk University, 78050 Karabuk, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected]. Accepted 6 May, 2011 Ticks are the ectoparasites that threatening animal and human health. Their effects on human health have started to attract attention, especially after the 1980s. Ticks can be seen in many parts of the world. Ticks are active during certain periods; many tick species are active between spring and autumn months. Tick bites may not be noticed immediately; when it is noticed, it should be immediately removed. While the tick is being removed, it is necessary to comply with certain rules. In this study, tick cases in the world and Turkey were mentioned then numbers of tick cases in Karabuk were investigated. The aim of the study is to examine the number of recorded cases in Eflani (Karabuk). The aim of the study is to examine the number of recorded cases in Eflani. The case records of Karabuk provincial health directorate about Crimean Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) were used in the research. At the end of the study, it was concluded that Eflani is the district that has more tick cases in the Province of Karabuk with its suitable geographical conditions to host ticks. Key words: Tick, Crimean Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF), Eflani, Karabuk, Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukur Village Mosque with Its Architectural Properties and Hand Drawn Ornaments*
    Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi The Journal of International Social Research Cilt: 10 Sayı: 49 Volume: 10 Issue: 49 Nisan 2017 April 2017 www.sosyalarastirmalar.com Issn: 1307-9581 ÇUKUR VILLAGE MOSQUE WITH ITS ARCHITECTURAL PROPERTIES AND HAND DRAWN ORNAMENTS* Lütfiye GÖKTAŞ KAYA** Şeref KAYA*** Abstract Çukur is a village settlement 16 kilometres away from the city center and is officially bound to the district of Ovacık in the West Black Sea Region. The mosque, which has the same name with the village, is one of the 18-20. century mosques with a “villageroom” and registered. This facility which is located within the mosque and which has all the elements of a traditional Turkish room can be found in various places in Karabük. The structure which was built with stone and masonry techniques has hand-drawn decorations on the walls of unpartitioned walls of “harim section” and women’s gathering-place. Various colors and motives were used in geometrical, herbal and inscribed compositions. This structure, which has never been focused on any scientific study, will be made public by means of the present study. The purpose of the monographic featured study is to introduce the structure with architectural and decorative features to scientific community, to draw attention to the protection and the sustainability of historical and cultural heritage. Keywords: Karabük, Cultural Heritage, Architecture, Late Ottoman Mosques, Hand-drawn Painting. 1. Introduction Çukur village is in Ovacık which is one of the 6 districts of Karabuk province including the central district. The district is 48 kilometres away to the province centre and Cukur village is 12 kilometres away to the district.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordovician Graptolites from the Basal Part of the Palaeozoic Transgressive Sequence in the Karadere Area, Zonguldak Terrane, NW Turkey
    Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2014, 63, 4, 227–232 doi: 10.3176/earth.2014.23 Ordovician graptolites from the basal part of the Palaeozoic transgressive sequence in the Karadere area, Zonguldak Terrane, NW Turkey M. Cemal Göncüoglua, Valeri Sachanskib, Juan Carlos Gutiérrez-Marcoc and Cengiz Okuyucud a METU, Department of Geological Engineering, 06531 Ankara,Turkey; [email protected] b UMG ‘St. Ivan Rilski’, Department of Geology and Geo-Information, Geological Institute, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria; [email protected] c Instituto de Geociencias (CSIC, UCM), José Antonio Novais 12, 28040 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] d Selcuk University, Department of Geological Engineering, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey; [email protected] Received 10 June 2014, accepted 15 September 2014 Abstract. The Karadere area to the east of Safranbolu in NW Anatolia is one of the very few localities in Turkey where the contact between the Cadomian basement and the Lower Palaeozoic transgressive succession is well exposed. The Ordovician graptolite Rhabdinopora flabelliformis (Eichwald) ssp. was found in the basal part of the Bakacak Formation, indicating an Early to early Late Tremadocian age for the beginning of the Palaeozoic transgression in the Zonguldak terrane. A few metres above this occurrence, another horizon contains Paradelograptus cf. antiquus (T. S. Hall), which mainly ranges into the Late Tremadocian. Higher up in the Ordovician succession, a new graptolite bed confirms an early Darriwilian (Dw1) age for the middle part of the Karadere Formation with the occurrence of the biozonal index Levisograptus austrodentatus (Harris & Keble) and the first record of Tetragraptus cor (Strandmark) in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Wheat Landraces in Farmers' Fields in Turkey. National Survey, Collection
    WHEAT LANDRACES IN FARMERS’ FIELDS IN TURKEY NATIONAL SURVEY, COLLECTION ©FAО/ Mustafa Kan Mustafa ©FAО/ AND CONSERVATION, 2009-2014 ©FAО/ Mustafa Kan Mustafa ©FAО/ Kan Mustafa ©FAО/ ©FAО/ Mustafa Kan Mustafa ©FAО/ Alexey Morgounov ©FAO/ WHEAT LANDRACES IN FARMERS’ FIELDS IN TURKEY NATIONAL SURVEY, COLLECTION AND CONSERVATION, 2009-2014 Mustafa KAN, Murat KÜÇÜKÇONGAR, Mesut KESER, Alexey MORGOUNOV, Hafiz MUMINJANOV, Fatih ÖZDEMIR, Calvin QUALSET FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Ankara, 2015 Citation: FAO, 2015. Wheat Landraces in Farmers’ Fields in Turkey: National Survey, Collection, and Conservation, 2009-2014, by Mustafa Kan, Murat Küçükçongar, Mesut Keser, Alexey Morgounov, Hafiz Muminjanov, Fatih Özdemir, Calvin Qualset The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISBN: 978-92-5-109048-0 © FAO, 2015
    [Show full text]
  • Karabuk University Brochure
    Foreign students can apply to Karabuk University and get a diploma and There is a public dormitory on campus run by The Higher Education Credit and apply with their national exam results or enter the exam administrated by Accommodation Institution and can accommodate nearly 3000 students. The Students Affairs Office at Karabuk University. Further info can be found at price of State owned dormitory (YURT KUR) in the campus is relatively cheaper http://oidb.karabuk.edu.tr/en/defaulteng.htm# than that in many European countries. The dormitory offers students some The Scholarships in Turkey: The public universities in Turkey do not provide facilities such laundry and dining hall. Students share the room with a roommate any scholarships to foreign students but there are some scholarships and each room includes private bathroom, personal desks, wardrobes and chest available by the governmental organizations. Please visit the web site below. of drawers. The cost of YURT KUR is roughly 60€ per month. http://www.trscholarships.org/ MEVLANA EXCHANGE PROGRAM Mevlana Exchange Program is a program run by Turkish Higher Education 25000 seat capacity Stadium with the shape of the star and crescent in Council(YÖK). The program aims the exchange of students and academic Turkish Flag staff between Turkish higher education institutions and higher education institutions of other countries. Students and academic staff exchange IRON AND STEEL INSTITUTE between Turkish higher education institutions and higher education institutions of other countries started with the regulation published 23 The Iron and Steel Instıtute is the first institute in Turkey August 2011. The difference between Mevlana Exchange Program and There are also many Private dormitories around the campus.
    [Show full text]