Kava Hepatotoxicity: Comparative Study of Two Structured Quantitative Methods for Causality Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kava Hepatotoxicity: Comparative Study of Two Structured Quantitative Methods for Causality Assessment Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics (2010) 35, 545–563 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2710.2009.01131.x ORIGINAL ARTICLE Kava hepatotoxicity: comparative study of two structured quantitative methods for causality assessment R. Teschke MD,J.FuchsMD,R.BahreMD,A.GenthnerMD and A. Wolff MD PhD Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Klinikum Hanau, Teaching Hospital of the Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt ⁄ Main, Hanau, Germany Keywords: causality assessment methods, herbal SUMMARY hepatotoxicity, kava, kava hepatotoxicity Background and objective: Ingestion of the medicinal herb kava has been associated with hepatotoxicity. We aimed to compare two differ- INTRODUCTION ent quantitative methods of causality assessment of patients with assumed hepatotoxicity by the Chemical drugs, herbal remedies and dietary sup- herb. plements are commonly considered as safe and Methods: We assessed causality in 26 patients devoid of major side effects, but in usually rare from Germany and Switzerland, using two struc- instances hepatotoxic reactions may emerge in a few tured quantitative analytical methods: the system susceptible individuals despite adherence to the of Maria and Victorino (MV) and that of the recommended daily dose and treatment duration Council for International Organizations of Medi- (1–4). Under these conditions, the diagnosis of toxic cal Sciences (CIOMS). In all 26 patients, regulatory liver disease represents a major clinical challenge ad hoc evaluation had suggested a causal and may only be established when other causes of relationship between liver disease and kava use. the observed liver disease have been excluded with Results and discussion: Assessment with the MV certainty. Indeed, there is no biomarker or surrogate scale resulted in no or low graded causality for marker commonly available which might facilitate kava in the 26 patients with liver disease. Causality the diagnosis of toxic liver disease (4). By clinical was probable (n = 1), possible (n = 2), unlikely criteria a differentiation between toxic and genuine (n = 7), and excluded (n = 16). Causality for kava liver disease is commonly not possible, because was more evident with the CIOMS scale: highly symptoms and clinical findings are similar in both probable (n = 1), probable (n = 2), possible (n = 6), conditions, including icterus, fatigue, right upper unlikely (n = 2) and excluded (n = 15). However, abdominal discomfort, dark urine, pale stool, pru- the results of both quantitative causality assess- ritus and weight loss (3, 4). ments are not supportive for most of the regulatory In the last few years, a world-wide discussion ad hoc causality assessments of the 26 patients. emerged on whether and, if so, to what extent, Conclusion: Grades of causality for suspected treatment with the anxiolytic herb kava is hepato- hepatotoxicity by kava were much lower when toxic (5–15). Kava has been used as ethanolic and evaluated by structured quantitative causality acetonic extracts of the rhizome of the pepper plant assessment scales than by regulatory ad hoc Piper methysticum G. Forster (5, 9). The initial cau- judgements. The quantitative CIOMS scale is the sality assessment was a regulatory one achieved on preferable tool for causality assessment of spon- an ad hoc basis. An association was assumed in 26 taneous reports of hepatotoxcity involving kava. patients from Germany and Switzerland (16). Based on identical data, the regulatory judgement Received 21 July 2009, Accepted 31 August 2009 of causality was not substantiated by another reg- Correspondence: R. Teschke, MD, Department of Internal ulatory agency (17) and health institute (18). It was Medicine II, Klinikum Hanau, Teaching Hospital of the Johann Wolfgang Goethe University of Frankfurt ⁄ Main, Leimenstraße criticized by various scientific groups (7–14), 20, D-63450 Hanau, Germany. Tel.: +49 6181 ⁄ 2964200; fax: especially when additional data were evaluated +49 6181 ⁄ 2964211; e-mail: [email protected] (5, 7, 12–14). Moreover, quantitative causality Ó 2010 The Authors. JCPT Ó 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 545 546 R. Teschke et al. assessments yielded conflicting results in two CIOMS (20). The scale was applied to kava and reports (14, 15). Supportive data in favour of the each co-medicated chemical drug, herbal remedy regulatory assessment were obtained in one study and dietary supplement. If there was more than (15) using the quantitative scale of MV, acronym one co-medication, only the co-medicated com- for the authors Maria and Victorino (MV) (19), but pound with the highest total score was considered not in another assessment (14) using the quantita- in the final assessment. tive scale of Council for International Organiza- The scores of the MV system relate to temporal tions of Medical Sciences (CIOMS), the acronym for relationships regarding onset of clinical or labora- the Council for International Organizations of tory manifestation, and normalization of laboratory Medical Sciences (20). values after drug discontinuation, exclusion of In the present study, we have evaluated causal- alternative causes, extrahepatic immuno-allergic ity for all 26 patients with liver disease, assumed in manifestations, results of re-exposure and previous a regulatory assessment to be causally associated published reports of cases of drug-induced liver with kava treatment. We retrieved additional data injury with the alleged drug (19). It provides for and used both the quantitative MV method and the each of these items a range of scores. The total score quantitative CIOMS scale. We found that, in the is then computed and used to assign causality as setting of regulatory evaluation of the observed being highly probable, probable, possible, unlikely liver disease in assumed relationship with kava, or excluded. the MV scale performed poorly compared with the CIOMS scale. With a few exemptions, both scales CIOMS scale failed to support the regulatory ad hoc causality assessments for kava. It appears that the CIOMS The quantitative CIOMS scale (20) was applied to scale is the preferred tool for causality assessment all 26 patients (14, 16). Causality assessment for in a setting of assumed kava hepatotoxicity. kava and co-medication was as described for the MV evaluation. The quantitative CIOMS uses items such as time to onset, course of improvement of PATIENTS AND METHODS laboratory data, risk factors, concomitant drugs, Patients search for non-drug causes, previous information on hepatotoxicity of the drug and response to Twenty-six patients originating from Germany re-administration (20). It provides with each of (n = 20) and Switzerland (n = 6) were studied. In these parameters a range of scores. The total score all patients, liver disease was causally attributed to is then computed and this is used for causality treatment with kava extracts, and the regulatory assessment as described above for the MV scale. assessment of causality for kava gave scores rang- ing from certain (n = 3) and probable (n = 15) to possible (n = 8) (16). For each of the patients, Comparative assessment essential data were collected from various sources The results presently obtained with the MV scale including the German and Swiss regulatory agen- were compared with the CIOMS scores for kava cies, drug manufacturers, primary-care physicians, and co-medications for all 26 patients (14). treating hospital physicians and pharmacists as described previously (14). Additional data were obtained from published reports quoted by the RESULTS regulators (16). General characteristics In the mostly female patients, daily overdose of MV scale kavapyrones (kavalactones), prolonged treatment All 26 patients underwent the structured quanti- and co-medication were common features tative causality assessment reported by MV (19). (Table 1), considering that the regulatory recom- The MV scale is a short and modified version of the mendation includes 60–120 mg kavalactones daily structured quantitative causality assessment of as maximum intake for no longer than 3 months. Ó 2010 The Authors. JCPT Ó 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 35, 545–563 Ó 2010 The Authors. JCPT Table 1. Clinical data of all patients (n = 26) with regulatory suspected liver disease in assumed association with the treatment by kava extracts (f = favourable, d = died) Ó 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Additional references Patient Identification Age (years) Sex Kava extract (months) Duration of therapy Kavapyrones Co-medication Outcome Regulatory information Additional information Regulatory (mg/day) ad hoc causality assessment Kava Co-medication Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics 01 BfArM 38 f Acetonic 3Æ5 210 Oral f Exclusion of Daily kava overdose ++ ) (7, 12, 13) 93015209 contraceptive non-kava Prolonged kava treatment Diazepam causes not Exclusion of hepatitis A, B, C, L-Thyroxine reported CMV, EBV, but not of HSV Exclusion of biliary obstruction and alcoholism Course of ALT not sufficiently documented, still increased after 6 weeks Normalisation of ALT not documented Autoimmunological parameters , 35 not assessed Kava hepatotoxicity , 545–563 Wilson‘s disease not excluded 547 548 R. Teschke Table 1. (Continued) Ó et al. 2010 The Authors. JCPT 02 BfArM 68 f Acetonic 24 210 St John’s wort f Exclusion of non-kava causes Daily kava overdose + ) (7, 12, 18) 94006568 Aluminium not communicated Prolonged kava treatment hydroxide Observed recurrent increase (2 years) of ALT during kava Exclusion
Recommended publications
  • Central Valley Toxicology Drug List
    Chloroform ~F~ Lithium ~A~ Chlorpheniramine Loratadine Famotidine Acebutolol Chlorpromazine Lorazepam Fenoprofen Acetaminophen Cimetidine Loxapine Fentanyl Acetone Citalopram LSD (Lysergide) Fexofenadine 6-mono- Clomipramine acetylmorphine Flecainide ~M~ Clonazepam a-Hydroxyalprazolam Fluconazole Maprotiline Clonidine a-Hydroxytriazolam Flunitrazepam MDA Clorazepate Albuterol Fluoxetine MDMA Clozapine Alprazolam Fluphenazine Medazepam Cocaethylene Amantadine Flurazepam Meperidine Cocaine 7-Aminoflunitrazepam Fluvoxamine Mephobarbital Codeine Amiodarone Fosinopril Meprobamate Conine Amitriptyline Furosemide Mesoridazine Cotinine Amlodipine Methadone Cyanide ~G~ Amobarbital Methanol Cyclobenzaprine Gabapentin Amoxapine d-Methamphetamine Cyclosporine GHB d-Amphetamine l-Methamphetamine Glutethamide l-Amphetamine ~D~ Methapyrilene Guaifenesin Aprobarbital Demoxepam Methaqualone Atenolol Desalkylfurazepam ~H~ Methocarbamol Atropine Desipramine Halazepam Methylphenidate ~B~ Desmethyldoxepin Haloperidol Methyprylon Dextromethoraphan Heroin Metoclopramide Baclofen Diazepam Hexobarbital Metoprolol Barbital Digoxin Hydrocodone Mexiletine Benzoylecgonine Dihydrocodein Hydromorphone Midazolam Benzphetamine Dihydrokevain Hydroxychloroquine Mirtazapine Benztropine Diltiazem Hydroxyzine Morphine (Total/Free) Brodificoum Dimenhydrinate Bromazepam ~N~ Diphenhydramine ~I~ Bupivacaine Nafcillin Disopyramide Ibuprofen Buprenorphine Naloxone Doxapram Imipramine Bupropion Naltrexone Doxazosin Indomethacin Buspirone NAPA Doxepin Isoniazid Butabarbital Naproxen
    [Show full text]
  • CAS Number Index
    2334 CAS Number Index CAS # Page Name CAS # Page Name CAS # Page Name 50-00-0 905 Formaldehyde 56-81-5 967 Glycerol 61-90-5 1135 Leucine 50-02-2 596 Dexamethasone 56-85-9 963 Glutamine 62-44-2 1640 Phenacetin 50-06-6 1654 Phenobarbital 57-00-1 514 Creatine 62-46-4 1166 α-Lipoic acid 50-11-3 1288 Metharbital 57-22-7 2229 Vincristine 62-53-3 131 Aniline 50-12-4 1245 Mephenytoin 57-24-9 1950 Strychnine 62-73-7 626 Dichlorvos 50-23-7 1017 Hydrocortisone 57-27-2 1428 Morphine 63-05-8 127 Androstenedione 50-24-8 1739 Prednisolone 57-41-0 1672 Phenytoin 63-25-2 335 Carbaryl 50-29-3 569 DDT 57-42-1 1239 Meperidine 63-75-2 142 Arecoline 50-33-9 1666 Phenylbutazone 57-43-2 108 Amobarbital 64-04-0 1648 Phenethylamine 50-34-0 1770 Propantheline bromide 57-44-3 191 Barbital 64-13-1 1308 p-Methoxyamphetamine 50-35-1 2054 Thalidomide 57-47-6 1683 Physostigmine 64-17-5 784 Ethanol 50-36-2 497 Cocaine 57-53-4 1249 Meprobamate 64-18-6 909 Formic acid 50-37-3 1197 Lysergic acid diethylamide 57-55-6 1782 Propylene glycol 64-77-7 2104 Tolbutamide 50-44-2 1253 6-Mercaptopurine 57-66-9 1751 Probenecid 64-86-8 506 Colchicine 50-47-5 589 Desipramine 57-74-9 398 Chlordane 65-23-6 1802 Pyridoxine 50-48-6 103 Amitriptyline 57-92-1 1947 Streptomycin 65-29-2 931 Gallamine 50-49-7 1053 Imipramine 57-94-3 2179 Tubocurarine chloride 65-45-2 1888 Salicylamide 50-52-2 2071 Thioridazine 57-96-5 1966 Sulfinpyrazone 65-49-6 98 p-Aminosalicylic acid 50-53-3 426 Chlorpromazine 58-00-4 138 Apomorphine 66-76-2 632 Dicumarol 50-55-5 1841 Reserpine 58-05-9 1136 Leucovorin 66-79-5
    [Show full text]
  • Kava - the Unfolding Story: Report on a Work-In-Progress
    Article Kava - the unfolding story: Report on a work-in-progress. Denham, Alison, McIntyre, Michael and Whitehouse, Jule Available at http://clok.uclan.ac.uk/9455/ Denham, Alison, McIntyre, Michael and Whitehouse, Jule Kava - the unfolding story: Report on a work-in-progress. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 8 (3). pp. 237-263. It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. For more information about UCLan’s research in this area go to http://www.uclan.ac.uk/researchgroups/ and search for <name of research Group>. For information about Research generally at UCLan please go to http://www.uclan.ac.uk/research/ All outputs in CLoK are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including Copyright law. Copyright, IPR and Moral Rights for the works on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the policies page. CLoK Central Lancashire online Knowledge www.clok.uclan.ac.uk THE JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Volume 8, Number 3, 2002, pp. 237–263 © Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. SPECIAL REPORT Kava—the Unfolding Story: Report on a Work-in-Progress ALISON DENHAM, B.A. (Soc.), M.N.I.M.H., 1 MICHAEL McINTYRE, M.A., F.N.I.M.H., F.R.C.H.M., M.B.Ac.C., 2 and JULIE WHITEHOUSE, Ph.D., M.N.I.M.H. 3 ABSTRACT This paper, originated as a submission (now updated) to the U.K. Medicines Control Agency and Committee of Safety of Medicines (CSM) on January 11, 2002, in response to a report circu- lated by the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Products (German initials are BfArM), a compilation of which is summarized in Appendix 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Letters to the Editor
    Letters to the Editor Internet Pharmacy Prescription complete the medication database. Of course, patients can abuse and Phentermine Overdose any medications, so collaboration between pharmacies and physicians is essential to minimize this risk. Sir: The Internet is now widely used by patients for both Dr. Takeshita reports no financial or other relationship relevant to the health information and prescription services. Yet, a MEDLINE subject matter of this letter. search in January 2002 using the phrase “Internet pharmacy” showed a total of 99 articles; nearly all were geared toward REFERENCES health care management or the general public. There are only a few published reports of bad outcome resulting from medical 1 1. Crocco AG, Villasis-Keever M, Jadad AR. Analysis of cases of information obtained from the Internet. The U.S. Food and harm associated with use of health information on the Internet. Drug Administration noted 326 Internet sites selling pharma- JAMA 2002;287:2867–2871 ceutical products.2 The exact numbers are difficult to quantify 2. Henney JE. Cyberpharmacies and the role of the US Food and Drug as Web sites are constantly changing. I report a case of overdose Administration. J Med Internet Res 2001;3:E3 with phentermine that was obtained through an Internet 3. Gardin JM, Schumacher D, Constantine G, et al. Valvular abnormali- pharmacy. ties and cardiovascular status following exposure to dexfenfluramine or phentermine/fenfluramine. JAMA 2000;283:1703–1709 4. Koury E, Stone CK, Stapczynski JS, et al. Sympathetic overactivity Case report. Ms. A, a 20-year-old woman with a prior from fenfluramine-phentermine overdose.
    [Show full text]
  • Please Check Desired Specimen Type & Drugs/Drug Classes for Testing
    PATIENT INFORMATION PRACTICE INFORMATION ____________________________________ _____________________________________ _______ ________________________ __________________ Last Name First Name MI Facility/Group Referring Physician ________/________/________ Social Security: _________-_________-________ ☐ Male ☐ Female ___________________________________________ Date of Birth Address NPI Provider Nr. __________________________________________________________________ Address DIAGNOSTIC CODES (ICD-10 codes): _____________________________ ☐ Self-Pay (attach Information) ☐ Commercial Insurance (attach copy) ☐ W/C (Date of Injury): ____________ ☐ Medicare (attach copy of Insurance) I certify that I have voluntarily provided a fresh unadulterated urine/dried blood/oral fluid specimen for analytical testing. The information provided on this form and on the label affixed to the specimen is accurate. I authorize lab to release the results of this testing to the ordering physician. I also authorize lab to bill my insurance provider and to receive payment of benefits for the tests ordered by my physician. I further authorize lab and the ordering physician to release to my insurance provider any medical information necessary to process this claim. I acknowledge that lab may be an out-of-network facility with my insurance provider. Patient Signature (or Legal Guardian): ___________________________________________________________________________ Date: _______________ TEST PANELS (please check desired specimen type & drugs/drug classes for testing): ☐ URINE
    [Show full text]
  • Kava Kava Extract Is Available from Ashland Chemical Co., Mini Star International, Inc., and QBI (Quality Botanical Ingredients, Inc.)
    SUMMARY OF DATA FOR CHEMICAL SELECTION Kava Kava 9000-38-8; 84696-40-2 November 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS Basis for Nomination Chemical Identification Production Information Use Pattern Human Exposure Regulatory Status Evidence for Possible Carcinogenic Activity Human Data Animal Data Metabolism Other Biological Effects Structure-Activity Relationships References BASIS OF NOMINATION TO THE CSWG Kava kava is brought to the attention of the CSWG because it is a rapidly growing, highly used dietary supplement introduced into the mainstream U.S. market relatively recently. Through this use, millions of consumers using antianxiety preparations are potentially exposed to kava kava. A traditional beverage of various Pacific Basin countries, kava clearly has psychoactive properties. The effects of its long-term consumption have not been documented adequately; preliminary studies suggest possibly serious organ system effects. The potential carcinogenicity of kava and its principal constituents are unknown. INPUT FROM GOVERNMENT AGENCIES/INDUSTRY The U.S. Pharmacopeia is in the process of reviewing kava kava. No decision on preparation of a monograph has been made. SELECTION STATUS ACTION BY CSWG: 12/14/98 Studies requested: - Toxicological evaluation, to include studies of reproductive toxicity and neurotoxicity - Genotoxicity Priority: High Rationale/Remarks: - Significant human exposure - Leading dietary supplement with rapidly growing use - Concern that kava has been promoted as a substitute for ritilin in children - Test extract standardized to 30 percent kavalactones - NCI is conducting studies in Salmonella typhimurium CHEMICAL IDENTIFICATION CAS Registry Number: 9000-38-8 Kava-kava resin (8CI) Chemical Abstract Service Name: 84696-40-2 CAS Registry Number: Pepper (Piper), P. methysticum, ext. Chemical Abstract Service Name: Extract of kava; kava extract; Piper Synonyms and Trade Names: methisticum extract Description: The tropical shrub Piper methysticum is widely cultivated in the South Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • Kavain, the Major Constituent of the Anxiolytic Kava
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Kavain, the Major Constituent of the Anxiolytic Kava Extract, Potentiates GABAA Receptors: Functional Characteristics and Molecular Mechanism Han Chow Chua1, Emilie T. H. Christensen1,2, Kirsten Hoestgaard-Jensen2, Leonny Y. Hartiadi1, Iqbal Ramzan1, Anders A. Jensen2, Nathan L. Absalom1, Mary Chebib1* 1 Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2 Department of a11111 Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark * [email protected] Abstract OPEN ACCESS Extracts of the pepper plant kava (Piper methysticum) are effective in alleviating anxiety in Citation: Chua HC, Christensen ETH, Hoestgaard- Jensen K, Hartiadi LY, Ramzan I, Jensen AA, et al. clinical trials. Despite the long-standing therapeutic interest in kava, the molecular target(s) (2016) Kavain, the Major Constituent of the Anxiolytic of the pharmacologically active constituents, kavalactones have not been established. γ- Kava Extract, Potentiates GABAA Receptors: Aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABAARs) are assumed to be the in vivo molecular tar- Functional Characteristics and Molecular Mechanism. PLoS ONE 11(6): e0157700. doi:10.1371/journal. get of kavalactones based on data from binding assays, but evidence in support of a direct pone.0157700 interaction between kavalactones and GABAARs is scarce and equivocal. In this study, we Editor: Steven Barnes, Dalhousie University, characterised the functional properties of the major anxiolytic kavalactone, kavain at human CANADA recombinant α1β2, β2γ2L, αxβ2γ2L (x = 1, 2, 3 and 5), α1βxγ2L (x = 1, 2 and 3) and α4β2δ Received: March 24, 2016 GABAARs expressed in Xenopus oocytes using the two-electrode voltage clamp technique.
    [Show full text]
  • Analytical Studies on the Kavain Metabolism in Human Specimen and Liver Cell Lines
    Analytical studies on the kavain metabolism in human specimen and liver cell lines Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf Vorgelegt von Fuad Ali Tarbah aus Derna, Libyen Düsseldorf 2003 Gedruckt mit Genehmigung der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf Referent: Prof. Dr. Th. Daldrup Korreferent: Prof. Dr. G. Willuhn, Prof. Dr. H. Weber Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 17. 12. 2003 Parts of this Ph.D. Thesis have already been presented and/or published in: Tarbah F. A., Mahler H., Temme O. and Daldrup Th. Mass spectral characterisation of hepatic cell metabolites of D,L-kavain using HPLC and GC/MS systems. Special issue: 37th TIAFT triennial meeting “Problems of Forensic Sciences” XLII: 173-180 (1999) Tarbah F. A., Mahler H., Temme O. and Daldrup Th. Determination of D,L-kavain and its metabolites in blood, serum and urine. Rapid quantitative method using fluid/fluid extraction and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Poster in 79. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rechtsmedizin, Medizinische Einrichtungen der Universität / Gesamthochschule Essen (2000) Tarbah F., Mahler H., Kardel B., Weinmann W., Hafner D. and Daldrup Th. Kinetics of kavain and its metabolites after oral application. J. Chromatogr. B 789 (1): 115-130 (2003) Cabalion P., Barguil Y., Duhet D., Mandeau A., Warter S., Russmann S., Tarbah F. and Daldrup Th. Kava in modern therapeutic uses: to a better evaluation
    [Show full text]
  • 5Mg/6Mg Tablets for Example Valsartan, Telmisartan, Irbesartan, Etc.), in Particular Ramipril 5Mg If You Have Diabetes-Related Kidney Problems, • Aliskiren
    PACKAGE LEAFLET: INFORMATION FOR THE USER • If you are taking any of the following medicines used to treat high blood pressure: • an ’angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARBs) (also known as sartans - 5mg/6mg Tablets for example valsartan, telmisartan, irbesartan, etc.), in particular Ramipril 5mg if you have diabetes-related kidney problems, • aliskiren. Piretanide 6mg Your doctor may check your kidney function, blood pressure, and the amount of electrolytes (e.g. potassium) in your blood at regular intervals. See information under the heading ’Do not take Trialix Tablets’. • You have gout Is this leaflet hard to see or read? • You feel dizzy or dehydrated. This can happen if you have lost a Phone 01 403 5600 for help lot of body salts or fluids (through being sick (vomiting), having Read all of this leaflet carefully before you start using this diarrhoea, sweating more than usual, being on a low salt diet, medicine because it contains important information for you. passing water very often or having had dialysis. It can also happen • Keep this leaflet. You may need to read it again if you are having trouble drinking or eating • If you have any further questions, ask your doctor or pharmacist • If you have been pre-treated with diuretics (drugs to increase • This medicine has been prescribed for you only. Do not pass it the rate of urination) on to others. It may harm them, even if their signs of illness are • You are going to receive an anaesthetic. This may be given for an the same as yours. operation or any dental work.
    [Show full text]
  • Piper Methysticum)
    Journal of Student Research (2015) Volume 4, Issue 2: pp. 69-72 Research Article A Closer Look at the Risks vs. Benefits of Kava (Piper methysticum) Anan A. Husseina If you took a trip to Fiji, the locals would probably welcome you with a drink of Kava. For centuries, the indigenous people of the South Pacific Islands have used the roots of a plant known as Kava. Beyond the use of Kava as a psychoactive substance, it has been incorporated as a cultural drink that is used in many ceremonies. In the late 1990’s Kava use spread quickly in Western countries including Europe, North America, and Australia. It was used as a treatment for anxiety. But just as quickly as it spread, the enthusiasm for it faded, because it was banned or restricted in many Western countries following reports of liver toxicity. In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) concern for safety prompted a request for more research on the substance. The issues of safety and efficacy remain more specifically whether the benefits of using Kava outweigh the risks. History Kava is a beverage made from the roots of the plant included alcohol, cocaine, tobacco, and heroin. The findings Piper methysticum, and has been used historically in the suggest that kava may reduce the craving associated with the South Pacific Islands as a ceremonial drink. Kava was aforementioned substances, which may make kava a great introduced in Europe around the 1700s by Captain James future candidate to help with addiction. 13 Cook and has since spread widely to Australia, Europe, and Although the mechanism of action is not clear, it is the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxic, and Comatose-Fatal Blood-Plasma Concentrations (Mg/L) in Man
    Therapeutic (“normal”), toxic, and comatose-fatal blood-plasma concentrations (mg/L) in man Substance Blood-plasma concentration (mg/L) t½ (h) Ref. therapeutic (“normal”) toxic (from) comatose-fatal (from) Abacavir (ABC) 0.9-3.9308 appr. 1.5 [1,2] Acamprosate appr. 0.25-0.7231 1311 13-20232 [3], [4], [5] Acebutolol1 0.2-2 (0.5-1.26)1 15-20 3-11 [6], [7], [8] Acecainide see (N-Acetyl-) Procainamide Acecarbromal(um) 10-20 (sum) 25-30 Acemetacin see Indomet(h)acin Acenocoumarol 0.03-0.1197 0.1-0.15 3-11 [9], [3], [10], [11] Acetaldehyde 0-30 100-125 [10], [11] Acetaminophen see Paracetamol Acetazolamide (4-) 10-20267 25-30 2-6 (-13) [3], [12], [13], [14], [11] Acetohexamide 20-70 500 1.3 [15] Acetone (2-) 5-20 100-400; 20008 550 (6-)8-31 [11], [16], [17] Acetonitrile 0.77 32 [11] Acetyldigoxin 0.0005-0.00083 0.0025-0.003 0.005 40-70 [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27] 1 Substance Blood-plasma concentration (mg/L) t½ (h) Ref. therapeutic (“normal”) toxic (from) comatose-fatal (from) Acetylsalicylic acid (ASS, ASA) 20-2002 300-3502 (400-) 5002 3-202; 37 [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34] Acitretin appr. 0.01-0.05112 2-46 [35], [36] Acrivastine -0.07 1-2 [8] Acyclovir 0.4-1.5203 2-583 [37], [3], [38], [39], [10] Adalimumab (TNF-antibody) appr. 5-9 146 [40] Adipiodone(-meglumine) 850-1200 0.5 [41] Äthanol see Ethanol -139 Agomelatine 0.007-0.3310 0.6311 1-2 [4] Ajmaline (0.1-) 0.53-2.21 (?) 5.58 1.3-1.6, 5-6 [3], [42] Albendazole 0.5-1.592 8-992 [43], [44], [45], [46] Albuterol see Salbutamol Alcuronium 0.3-3353 3.3±1.3 [47] Aldrin -0.0015 0.0035 50-1676 (as dieldrin) [11], [48] Alendronate (Alendronic acid) < 0.005322 -6 [49], [50], [51] Alfentanil 0.03-0.64 0.6-2.396 [52], [53], [54], [55] Alfuzosine 0.003-0.06 3-9 [8] 2 Substance Blood-plasma concentration (mg/L) t½ (h) Ref.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug and Medication Classification Schedule
    KENTUCKY HORSE RACING COMMISSION UNIFORM DRUG, MEDICATION, AND SUBSTANCE CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE KHRC 8-020-1 (11/2018) Class A drugs, medications, and substances are those (1) that have the highest potential to influence performance in the equine athlete, regardless of their approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration, or (2) that lack approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration but have pharmacologic effects similar to certain Class B drugs, medications, or substances that are approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Acecarbromal Bolasterone Cimaterol Divalproex Fluanisone Acetophenazine Boldione Citalopram Dixyrazine Fludiazepam Adinazolam Brimondine Cllibucaine Donepezil Flunitrazepam Alcuronium Bromazepam Clobazam Dopamine Fluopromazine Alfentanil Bromfenac Clocapramine Doxacurium Fluoresone Almotriptan Bromisovalum Clomethiazole Doxapram Fluoxetine Alphaprodine Bromocriptine Clomipramine Doxazosin Flupenthixol Alpidem Bromperidol Clonazepam Doxefazepam Flupirtine Alprazolam Brotizolam Clorazepate Doxepin Flurazepam Alprenolol Bufexamac Clormecaine Droperidol Fluspirilene Althesin Bupivacaine Clostebol Duloxetine Flutoprazepam Aminorex Buprenorphine Clothiapine Eletriptan Fluvoxamine Amisulpride Buspirone Clotiazepam Enalapril Formebolone Amitriptyline Bupropion Cloxazolam Enciprazine Fosinopril Amobarbital Butabartital Clozapine Endorphins Furzabol Amoxapine Butacaine Cobratoxin Enkephalins Galantamine Amperozide Butalbital Cocaine Ephedrine Gallamine Amphetamine Butanilicaine Codeine
    [Show full text]