A Advance Passenger Information (API) Australia Immigration and Customs, 147 Guidelines, 138–140 Mexican Approach, 149 Passeng

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Advance Passenger Information (API) Australia Immigration and Customs, 147 Guidelines, 138–140 Mexican Approach, 149 Passeng Index A identification process, 111 Advance passenger information (API) machine readable travel document, 110 Australia Immigration and Customs, 147 physiological, 111 guidelines, 138–140 quantum cryptography, 109 Mexican approach, 149 Bonn declaration passenger name record, 121–122 aerial communication, 247 public authorities, 135 French delegate, 248 recommendation, 136–137 incompatibility, Vienna Convention, 249 United States legislation, PNR, 140–142 international civil aviation Air Transport Committee (ATC), 63, 64 Contracting States, 250 American Transportation & Security Act, transit agreement, 250–251 140, 141 legal status, 247–249 Audit Results Review Board (ARRB), 270 prosecution or extradition, 252–253 Audits Soviet Union delegate, 248 aviation assets, 266 transit agreement, 250–252 corrective action plan, 269 follow-up missions, 269 C ICAO Council Canadian Immigration and Refugee Act, 142 Chicago Convention, Article 54(j), 271 Chicago Convention inherent powers, 273 aviation security, 57 Resolution A36-2, 271 carriage of documents, 160 Vienna Convention, Article 34, 274 civil aircraft, 159 identified deficiencies, 266 civil aviation, 210–212, 251 scheduling/frequency model, 270 Contracting State, 56, 128, 250 security culture, 265 customs, 195–196 security oversight scope in Article 3, 211–212 follow-up visits, 270 Complicity theory, 42–43 limited level of transparency, 268–269 Condonation theory, State responsibility Universal Security Audit Programme categories, 50 (USAP), 268 causality principle, 50 Aviation Security Manual, 277 Jane case, 48 Aviation Working Group (AWG), 98 separate delict theory, 50 United Nations General Assembly, 49 B war crime, 51 Biometric identification, innovative security Conference of Parties (COP), 102–104 tools Contracting States challenges, 112 Australian position, 147–148 281 282 Index Contracting States (cont.) high seas, operations, 163–166 Canadian position legal and regulatory issues, 162–163 accuracy of the data, 143 as state aircraft, 168–174 Canadian Immigration and Refugee Emerging threats Act, 142 anti-missile system installation, 32 German and Swiss positions, 148–149 AVSEC panel Mexican approach, 149–151 aviation security regime, 19, 20 Safe Harbour principles, 146–147 European Civil Aviation Conference, 19 United Kingdom position bioterrorism British Airways, 145 international air transport regulations, UK Data Protection Act, 146 22 United States legislation, API and PNR real-time outbreak disease surveillance, American Transportation & Security 23 Act, 140, 141 SARS virus, 21, 22 WCO/IATA guideline, 141 Spanish flu virus, 21 Convention for the Suppression of the carriage of liquids, aerosols and gels, 38 Financing of Terrorism, 277 cyber-terrorism, 24–25 Convention on International Civil Aviation deterrence, 13–16 advance passenger information, 131 high level ministerial conference, 2–7 Contracting State, 56 ICAO, threat assessment, 16–19 Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate international accord, 33–36 Homicide Act, 100–101 Man Portable Air Defense System (MANPADS) D aircraft security, 25 Departure control systems (DCS), 124, 125 El Al airliners, 28 ex post facto, 26 E PFLP group, 30 Early twenty-first century initiatives Rand corporation, 26 advance passenger information, 121–123, RPG-7 portable rocket launch, 31 139–141 surface-to-air missiles, 27 innovative security tools surface-to-surface missiles, 27 biometric identification, 109–112 missile attacks, 29–31 public key directory, 112–121 perimeter guard, 32–33 liability Conventions post conference work, 7–9 General Risks Convention, 93–98 probability, 9–13 Unlawful Interference Compensation Enhanced Border Security and Visa Reform Convention, 98–109 Act, 132 machine readable travel documents capacity-building strategy, 153 G ICBWG, 152, 153, 155 General Risk Convention UN Security Council’s Resolution damage by aircraft, 95 1373, 152 Exclusive Remedy provision, 97 vocational training, 155 ICAO initiative, 94 passenger name record International Air Transport Association, 98 advanced passenger information mental and bodily injury, 96–97 guidelines, 138–140 weight of the aircraft, 97, 98 advantages of unified guidelines, Geneva Convention on the High Seas (1958) 126–138 aircraft piracy, 217 Contracting States’ positions, 140–151 hijacking and piracy, 215–218 definition and application, 123–125 illegal violence, 216 importance, 125–126 international law, 214 unmanned aerial vehicles offence, 213–214 air traffic services, 166–167 piracy jure gentium, 26 Index 283 H opiates carriage, first-aid kits, 189 Hague Convention on hijacking 1970, 230 recommendation, 190–191 efficiency, 236–237 legal liability, 117 powers and duties market-based measures, 90 extradition treaty, 234–235 member States, 267 jurisdictional powers, 233–234 operational measures, 89 obligations, 232–233 organizational matters, 116 scope, 231–232 post conference work, 7–9 Hostis humani generis, 279 protagonist, 117 recommendations, 265 I Resolution A36-2, 271 Implementation and Capacity Building TAG/MRTD, 115, 116 Working Group (ICBWG), 152 technology and standards, 89 Innovative security tools USAP follow-up missions, 265 biometric identification Vienna Convention, Article 34, 274 challenges, 112 International Convention for the Suppression identification process, 111 of the Financing of Terrorism, 49 machine readable travel document, 110, International Conventions 111 Chicago Convention of 1944 physiological biometrics, 111 civil aviation, 210–212 quantum cryptography, 109 scope in Article 3, 211–212 public key directory Geneva Convention on the High Seas encryption and decryption process, 113, (1958) 114 aircraft piracy, 217 ICAO, 115–120 hijacking and piracy, 215–216 PKI scheme, 113 illegal violence, 216 waiver of immunity, 120–121 international law, 214 International Air Services Transit Agreement offence, 217–218 (IASTA), 129, 250–252 piracy jure gentium, 216 International Air Transport Association (IATA) Convention for the Prevention and State responsibility, 40, 41 Punishment of Terrorism (1937), 210 WCO, 139, 141 United Nations Charter, 212–213 International Civil Aviation Compensation International Court of Justice (ICJ) Fund, 102 Corfu Channel case, 52 International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Lockerbie case, 44 Air Transport Committee, 63 International Criminal Police Organization ARRB, 270 (ICPO), 204 capacity-building strategy, 153 International drug control system, 178 capacity to conduct business, 117–119 International Explosives Technical Chicago Convention, 57, 271 Commission (IETC), 260–261 Contracting States, 88, 265 International Law Commission environmental protection, 88, 89 Report to General Assembly, 52–53 Facilitation Division, 135 United Nations Charter, Article 51, 50 high level ministerial conference, 2–7 International Maritime Organization, 185 immunities and liabilities, 119–120 inherent powers, 273 L initiatives Liability Conventions action against opiate carriage, 192–193 General Risk Convention Annex 9, 196 damage by aircraft, 95 consideration, 192 Exclusive Remedy provision, 97 drug smuggling, 197 ICAO initiative, 94 narcotic drugs and psychotropic International Air Transport substances, 194–195 Association, 98 284 Index mental and bodily injury, 96–97 civil aircraft, 200 weight of the aircraft, 97, 98 foreign aircraft, 200–201 Unlawful Interference Compensation Convention on International Civil Aviation, Convention Article 4, 198–199 commercial airline pilots, 101–102 definition, 179 Conference of Parties, 103, 104 drug trade, 177–178 Diplomatic Conference, 105 facets, 177 domestic opt-in declaration, 104 global drug production, 178–179 “gross breach,” 101 ICAO assembly resolution A 27-12 ICAO Security Panel, 108 Contracting States, 202 International Civil Aviation misuse of civil aviation, 203 Compensation Fund, 102 ICAO initiatives offence, 101 action against opiate carriage, 192–193 operators, 100 Annex 9, 196 “relevant duty of care,” 101 consideration, 192 victims of violent crime, 106–107 Nairobi Convention, 197 Lockerbie case, State responsibility narcotic drugs and psychotropic ICJ, 44 substances, 194–195 Montreal Convention, 44, 46 opiates carriage, first-aid kits, 189 Security Council Resolution 748 (1992), recommendation, 190–191 45, 46 smuggling, 197 United Nations Charter, Article 24, 46 international drug control system, 178 offence, 177 M Tokyo Convention, 201–202 Machine readable travel documents (MRTD) United Nations initiatives capacity-building strategy, 153 council decision 1985/131 of 28 May ICBWG, 152, 153 1985, 180 passports complaint, 156 draft Convention, 182 UN Security Council’s Counter-Terrorism drug trafficking and drug abuse, 187 Committee, 155 efforts, 187–188 UN Security Council’s Resolution ICAO, 184 1373, 152 against illicit traffic in narcotic drugs vocational training, 155 and psychotropic substances, Man Portable Air Defense System 186–187 (MANPADS), 25–29 international co-operation, 183, 185 Mexico–United States General Claims ratification, 184 Commission, 43 resolution 36/168, 181 Montreal Convention (1971) resolution 40/122, 179–180 aircraft in service, 237–238 sea transport, 185 jurisdictional powers of States, 242–246 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs offence of 1961, 180 aircraft in flight, 240 State co-operation, 185–186 definition, 238 National Aeronautics and Space violence, 239–240 Administration, 24 severe penalties air navigation facilities, 242 O Hague Convention, 241 Office for Victims of Crime (OVC), 41–42 Montreal Protocol of 1978, 80–81 P N Passenger name record (PNR) Nairobi
Recommended publications
  • SOLOMON AIRLINES We’Re Redefining Airline Growth
    ISSUE APRIL 2015 7 ISSN 2304-5043 PACIFICAVIATION MAGAZINE THE PACIFIC'S LEADING AVIATION MAGAZINE | No.1 in Circulation and Readershipskies FEATURE AIRLINE: SOLOMON AIRLINES We’re redefining airline growth Maximize the revenue from every seat sold Travelport’s Merchandising Platform transforms the way you deliver, differentiate and retail your brand to over 67,000 travel agency customers globally. Our award-winning and industry-leading technology, encompassing Rich Content and Branding, Aggregated Shopping and Ancillary Services, is designed to maximize the revenue you can generate from every seat sold. Discover how our platform can help grow your business. Please contact [email protected] for more information. © 2014 Travelport. All rights reserved travelport.com ISSUE APRIL 2015 7 ISSN 2304-5043 PACIFICAVIATION MAGAZINE skies FRONT COVER: Solomon Airlines See cover story for more information 13 20 40 56 Contents 04 MESSAGE FROM THE EXECUTIVES 41 SUNFLOWER AVIATION LIMITED Message from Director SPC Economic 43 PACIFIC FLYING SCHOOL Development Division Message from Secretary-General Association of 46 PACIFIC AVIATION SAFETY OFFICE South Pacific Airlines PASO climbing to greater heights 06 ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH PACIFIC 47 PACIFIC AVIATION SECURITY AIRLINES Pacific Island aviation security capacity building Regional meeting of aviation experts at the 61st ASPA 49 TRANSPORTATION SECURITY General Session ADMINISTRATION 12 CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY OF NEW Aviation security: The importance of building CALEDONIA unpredictability and
    [Show full text]
  • In-Flight Crimes, the Tokyo Convention, and Federal Judicial Jurisdiction, 35 J
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 35 | Issue 2 Article 2 1969 In-Flight Crimes, The okyT o Convention, and Federal Judicial Jurisdiction Jacob M. Denaro Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Jacob M. Denaro, In-Flight Crimes, The Tokyo Convention, and Federal Judicial Jurisdiction, 35 J. Air L. & Com. 171 (1969) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol35/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. IN-FLIGHT CRIMES, THE TOKYO CONVENTION, AND FEDERAL JUDICIAL JURISDICTION By JACOB M. DENAROt I. INTRODUCTION A T TOKYO in 1963, a specialized agency of the United Nations 1 drafted a convention directed against offenses committed on board aircraft. The United States is signatory to that convention; but neither that sovereign nor a requisite number of States necessary to effectuate the document have as yet ratified the Tokyo Convention. Whether the Conven- tion should be ratified is a matter seriously being considered by the United States Government. The decision is dependent on two vital factors. First, it depends upon the ability of the Convention to respond to serious de- ficiencies presently existent in international criminal air law. Second, it depends upon the capacity of federal law to complement the Convention in areas which are intrinsically related to the subject matter of that docu- ment but which are, because of their inherently domestic nature, inappro- priate areas for a multilateral treaty.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Aviation Law by Timothy M. Ravich
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 86 Issue 1 Article 4 2021 Book Review: Introduction to Aviation Law by Timothy M. Ravich Paul S. Dempsey McGill University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Part of the Air and Space Law Commons Recommended Citation Paul S. Dempsey, Book Review: Introduction to Aviation Law by Timothy M. Ravich, 86 J. AIR L. & COM. 167 (2021) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol86/iss1/4 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. BOOK REVIEW: INTRODUCTION TO AVIATION LAW By Timothy M. Ravich Paul Stephen Dempsey* Legal historian Stuart Banner has declared air law dead, observing the declining number of U.S. educational programs in aviation law and law professors teaching it.1 As he explains, “Air law ceased to be a useful category when the airplane was no longer a novelty.”2 Professor Robert Jarvis disagrees: “Aviation law, after years of languishing on the sidelines, currently is enjoying unprecedented popularity in American law schools. [S]ome of the attention is due to the fact that, for the first time in history, instructors can choose from three competing aviation law casebooks.”3 Now there is a fourth—Introduction to Aviation Law by Professor Timothy M. Ravich of the University of Central Florida4—as well as a plethora of texts and treatises published in the last two decades alone.5 Aviation law is alive and well.
    [Show full text]
  • Descriptive Study of Aircraft Hijacking. Criminal Justice Monograph, Volume III, No
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 073 315 VT 019 207 AUTHCP Turi, Robert R.; And Others TITLE Descriptive Study of Aircraft Hijacking. Criminal Justice Monograph, Volume III, No. 5. INSTITUTION Sam Houston State Univ., Huntsville,Tex. Inst. of Contemporary Corrections and the Behavioral Sciences. PUB DATE 72 NOTE 177p. EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$6.58 DESCRIPTORS *Aerospace Industry; Case Studies; Correctional Rehabilitation; *Criminals; Government Role; *International Crimes; *International Law;Legal' Problems; *Prevention; Program Descriptions; *Psychological Characteristics; Psychological Patterns; Security; Statistical Data IDENTIFIERS Criminal Justice; *Skyjacking ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to comprehensively describe all aspects of the phenomenonknown as "skyjacking." The latest statistics on airline hijackingare included, which were obtained through written correspondence and personalinterviews with Federal Aviation Authority officials inWashington, D. C. and Houston, Texas. Legal and technical journalsas well as government documents were reviewed, and on the basisof this review:(1) Both the national and international legalaspects of hijacking activities are provided,(2) The personality and emotional state ofthe skyjacker are examined, and (3) Preventionmeasures taken by both the government and the airline industryare discussed, including the sky marshal program, the pre-boarding screeningprocess, and current developments in electronic detection devices.The human dimensions and diverse dangers involved in aircraftpiracy are delineated.
    [Show full text]
  • Securing the Skies from Unruly Passengers Onwards to the Montreal Protocol
    Securing the Skies from Unruly Passengers Onwards to the Montreal Protocol Abstract This paper aims to critically evaluate the legal instruments set out to address unruly behaviours on board an aircraft, examining the deficiency of the responses from the Tokyo Convention of 1963 and assessing the impact of the Montreal Protocol of 2014. The present analysis discusses the effectiveness of the newly adopted definitions and jurisdictional provisions. Notwithstanding the inadequacy of the Tokyo Convention, the amendments made in 2014 thereto are not deemed as full-fledged solutions. Therefore the author encourages a proactive approach leveraging the operational tools adopted by airlines associations, taking the Civil Aviation Requirements laid down by the Indian Ministry of Civil Aviation and Director General of Civil Aviation as a leading example. The severity and increasing rel- evance of unruly behaviours together with the risk of lawlessness are presented as main reasons to outweigh States’ reluctance in the ratification process and trigger a robust legal response including airlines’ associations and civil aviation authorities in the drafting process. 2 Table of Contents 1. Setting the scene ................................................................................................................. 4 2. Unruly/disruptive behaviours: what is in a name ............................................................... 5 2.1. The order of magnitude ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation Kits for the International Counter-Terrorism Conventions
    Implementation Kits for the International Counter-Terrorism Conventions Criminal Law Section Legal and Constitutional Affairs Division Commonwealth Secretariat Marlborough House Pall Mall London SW1Y 5HX United Kingdom Table of Contents Page PREFACE.............................................................................................................................iii ABBREVIATIONS AND WEBSITES...............................................................................iv CHAPTER ONE - INTRODUCTION Introduction............................................................................................................................1 CHAPTER TWO – TOKYO CONVENTION Analysis of Convention On Offences And Certain Other Acts Committed on Board Aircraft 1963........................................................................................................12 Text of the Convention on Offences and Certain Other Acts Committed on Board Aircraft 1963........................................................................................................22 List of Signatures, Ratifications, Accessions and Successions..............................................30 Model Legislative Provisions ................................................................................................38 Notes ....................................................................................................................................45 CHAPTER THREE – HAGUE CONVENTION Analysis of Convention For The Suppression Of Unlawful Seizure Of Aircraft
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Aviation and Its Changing World of Work
    GDFCAI/2013 Civil aviation and its changing world of work Sectoral Sectoral Activities Department Activities International Labour Office (ILO) Department 4, route des Morillons CH-1211 Genève 22 Switzerland INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION Sectoral Activities Department GDFCAI/2013 Civil aviation and its changing world of work Issues paper for discussion at the Global Dialogue Forum on the Effects of the Global Economic Crisis on the Civil Aviation Industry (Geneva, 20–22 February 2013) Geneva, 2013 INTERNATIONAL LABOUR OFFICE, GENEVA INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION Sectoral Activities Department GDFCAI/2013 Civil aviation and its changing world of work Issues paper for discussion at the Global Dialogue Forum on the Effects of the Global Economic Crisis on the Civil Aviation Industry (Geneva, 20–22 February 2013) Geneva, 2013 INTERNATIONAL LABOUR OFFICE, GENEVA Copyright © International Labour Organization 2013 First edition 2013 Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to ILO Publications (Rights and Permissions), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered with reproduction rights organizations may make copies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. Visit www.ifrro.org to find the reproduction rights organization in your country. Civil aviation and its changing world of work: Issues paper for discussion at the Global Dialogue Forum on the Effects of the Global Economic Crisis on the Civil Aviation Industry, Geneva, 20–22 February 2013/International Labour Office, Sectoral Activities Department.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Security:Security: Thethe Rolerole Ofof Internationalinternational Lawlaw
    AviationAviation Security:Security: TheThe RoleRole ofof InternationalInternational LawLaw Professor Dr. Paul Stephen Dempsey Copyright © 2008 by the author. TerrorismTerrorism TerrorismTerrorism isis ideologicallyideologically oror politicallypolitically motivatedmotivated violenceviolence directeddirected againstagainst civiliancivilian targets.targets. TerrorismTerrorism isis unconventionalunconventional warfare,warfare, andand psychologicalpsychological warfare,warfare, designeddesigned toto instillinstill fear.fear. TerrorismTerrorism isis aa symptomsymptom ofof aa moremore perniciouspernicious diseasedisease foundfound amongamong thethe militarilymilitarily weak,weak, thethe politicallypolitically frustrated,frustrated, andand thethe religiouslyreligiously fanatic.fanatic. TheThe VulnerabilityVulnerability ofof AirAir TransportationTransportation “The nation’s vast air, land, and maritime transportation systems are marvels of innovation and productivity, but they are designated to be accessible, and their very function is to concentrate passenger and freight flows in ways that can create many vulnerabilities for terrorists to exploit. “Designed and organized for the efficient, convenient, and expeditious movement of large volumes of people and goods, transportation systems must have a high degree of user access.” ♠ ♠ Transportation Research Board ActsActs ofof UnlawfulUnlawful InterferenceInterference Hijackings account for the largest percentage of all attacks against civil aviation. Other criminal acts include: • airport attacks;
    [Show full text]
  • Countermeasures, Article 3BIS of the Chicago Convention, and the Newly Adopted German "Luftsicherheitsgesetz"
    Michigan Journal of International Law Volume 27 Issue 1 2005 Civil Aircraft as Weapons of Large-Scale Destruction: Countermeasures, Article 3BIS of the Chicago Convention, and the Newly Adopted German "Luftsicherheitsgesetz" Robin Geiß Bucerius Law School, Hamburg Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil Part of the International Law Commons, Legislation Commons, and the National Security Law Commons Recommended Citation Robin Geiß, Civil Aircraft as Weapons of Large-Scale Destruction: Countermeasures, Article 3BIS of the Chicago Convention, and the Newly Adopted German "Luftsicherheitsgesetz", 27 MICH. J. INT'L L. 227 (2005). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol27/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Journal of International Law at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CIVIL AIRCRAFT AS WEAPONS OF LARGE-SCALE DESTRUCTION: COUNTERMEASURES, ARTICLE 3BIS OF THE CHICAGO CONVENTION, AND THE NEWLY ADOPTED GERMAN "LUFTSICHERHEITSGESETZ" Robin Geifl* I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................... 227 II. SAFEGUARDING INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION- THE DICHOTOMY OF THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK ........................ 230 A. Threats Stemming from Nonstate Actors ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • Tokyo Convention - 2 - 14 September 1963
    CONVENTION ON OFFENCES AND CERTAIN OTHER ACTS COMMITTED ON BOARD AIRCRAFT SIGNED AT TOKYO ON 14 SEPTEMBER 1963 Entry into force: Convention entered into force on 4 December 1969. Status: 187 Parties. Date of deposit of instrument of ratification, accession or State Date of signature succession Effective date Afghanistan - 15 April 1977 14 July 1977 Albania - 1 December 1997 1 March 1998 Algeria (1) - 12 October 1995 10 January 1996 Andorra (37) - 17 May 2006 15 August 2006 Angola - 24 February 1998 25 May 1998 Antigua and Barbuda - 19 July 1985 17 October 1985 Argentina - 23 July 1971 21 October 1971 Armenia - 23 January 2003 23 April 2003 Australia - 22 June 1970 20 September 1970 Austria - 7 February 1974 8 May 1974 Azerbaijan (1) - 5 February 2004 5 May 2004 Bahamas (2) - 12 June 1975 10 July 1973 Bahrain (1)(3) - 9 February 1984 9 May 1984 Bangladesh - 25 July 1978 23 October 1978 Barbados 25 June 1969 4 April 1972 3 July 1972 Belarus (1)(4) - 3 February 1988 3 May 1988 Belgium 20 December 1968 6 August 1970 4 November 1970 Belize - 19 May 1998 17 August 1998 Benin - 30 March 2004 28 June 2004 Bhutan - 25 January 1989 25 April 1989 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) - 5 July 1979 3 October 1979 Bosnia and Herzegovina (5) - 7 March 1995 6 March 1992 Botswana - 16 January 1979 16 April 1979 Brazil 28 February 1969 14 January 1970 14 April 1970 Brunei Darussalam - 23 May 1986 21 August 1986 Bulgaria (6) - 28 September 1989 27 December 1989 Burkina Faso 14 September 1963 6 June 1969 4 December 1969 Burundi - 14 July 1971 12 October 1971
    [Show full text]
  • Safety in Flight.Pdf
    SAFETY IN FLIGHT WHEN CAN COMMERCIAL AIRLINE PILOTS REMOVE PASSENGERS WHO MAY BE A THREAT? By Oliver Beiersdorf and Catherine E. Kiernan ISTOCK.COM/OSTILL © PHOTO BY: PHOTO BY: Published in The Brief, Volume 47, Number 4, Summer 2018. © 2018 by the American Bar Association. Reproduced with permission. All rights reserved. This information or any portion thereof may not be copied or disseminated in any form or by any means or stored in an electronic database or retrieval system without the express written consent of the American Bar Association. n May 2018, a woman was removed from a Spirit Air- FAA: Rights of Air Carriers to Exclude or Refuse lines flight from Atlanta to Las Vegas because she to Accept Passengers allegedly ran past a gate attendant after being told she Congress’s purpose in enacting the FAA was “to pro- was too late to board, refused to leave the plane when mote safety in aviation and thereby protect the lives of Iasked by the flight crew, and screamed profanities at the persons who travel on board aircraft.”4 To help accom- flight crew.1 Ultimately, all of the other passengers had plish that goal, 49 U.S.C. § 44902(b) of the FAA, to deplane before officers could escort the woman off known as “permissive refusal,” provides pilots with broad of the plane. All of this occurred while the pilots were authority to remove passengers: focusing on completing preflight checks and preparing the aircraft for takeoff to ensure a safe flight. This inci- (b) Permissive refusal.—Subject to regulations of the dent, like many others where passengers are removed Under Secretary, an air carrier, intrastate air carrier, or from commercial flights, was recorded, posted on social foreign air carrier my refuse to transport a passenger or media, and highlighted by various news organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • WASHINGTON AVIATION SUMMARY May 2014 EDITION
    WASHINGTON AVIATION SUMMARY May 2014 EDITION CONTENTS I. REGULATORY NEWS .............................................................................................. 1 II. AIRPORTS ................................................................................................................ 5 III. SECURITY AND DATA PRIVACY ……………………..................................................7 IV. E-COMMERCE AND TECHNOLOGY ....................................................................... 8 V. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT .............................................................................. 10 VI. U.S. CONGRESS .................................................................................................... 12 VII. BILATERAL AND STATE DEPARTMENT NEWS ................................................... 14 VIII. EUROPE/AFRICA ................................................................................................... 15 IX. ASIA/PACIFIC/MIDDLE EAST ................................................................................ 17 X. AMERICAS ............................................................................................................. 19 For further information, including documents referenced, contact: Joanne W. Young Kirstein & Young PLLC 1750 K Street NW Suite 200 Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: (202) 331-3348 Fax: (202) 331-3933 Email: [email protected] http://www.yklaw.com The Kirstein & Young law firm specializes in representing U.S. and foreign airlines, airports, leasing companies, financial institutions
    [Show full text]