Report-First-Part.Pdf
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Sl. No. Content Page No. 1. Recommendations of Three Member Expert Committee on 1 “High Level Working Group Report” 2. Procedure for Demarcating ESA Villages 20 3. Annexure I – Maps of Cadastral Scale ESA Villages 23 4. Annexure III – Cadastral Survey Mapping procedure 156 Contents - Survey details Sl. No Name of Village Page No. I Thiruvananthapuram District 1 Peringamala 218 2 Thennur 219 3 Vidura 220 4 Mannurkkara 221 5 Vazhichal 228 6 Amboori 230 7 Kallikkad 231 II Kollam District 8 Punnala 233 9 Piravanthur 234 10 Edamon 235 11 Thenmala 236 12 Aryankavu 237 13 Thingal karikkam 240 14 Kulathupuzha 241 15 Chennapettah 243 III Pathanamthitta District 16 Thannithodu 245 17 Aruvappalam 246 18 Chittar-Seethathodu 247 19 Kollumala 249 20 Perunad 250 21 Vadasserikkara 251 IV Ernakulam District 22 Kuttampuzha 253 V Idukki District 23 Marayoor 256 24 Keezhanthoor 264 25 Kannandevan Hills 273 26 Kottakamboor 277 27 Kanthalloor 281 28 Vattavada 290 29 Mankulam 302 30 Mannamkandam 303 31 Pallivasal 310 32 Anaviratti 312 33 Kunjithanni 314 34 Vellathooval 316 35 Upputhara 320 36 Kumily 321 37 Manjamala 323 38 Periyar 324 39 Kokkayar 325 40 Peerumed 332 41 Mlapra 337 42 Peruvanthanam 338 43 Kanjikuzhy 339 44 Udumbannoor 355 45 Idukki 361 46 Arakulam 363 47 Chinnakkanal 366 48 Bisonvalley 370 49 Rajakumari 376 50 Pooppara 385 51 Rajakadu 390 52 Konnathady 396 53 Santhanpara 397 54 Kandhippara 405 55 Chathurangappara 408 56 Vathikkudy 417 57 Udumbanchola 422 58 Upputhodu 429 59 Parathod 432 60 Kalkunthal 436 61 Thankamany 439 62 Ayyappankovil 443 63 Pambadumpara 446 64 Kattappana 447 65 Karunapuram 448 66 Vandanmedu 450 67 Anakkara 451 68 Anavilasam 452 69 Chakkupallam 456 VI Thrissur District 70 Pariyaram 458 VII Palakkad District 71 Kizhakkanchery 1 462 72 Muthalamada 1 468 73 Muthalamada II 482 74 Nelliyampathy 490 75 Puthur 493 76 Padavayal 505 77 Agali 516 78 Kottathara 537 79 Sholayar 553 80 Kallamala 573 81 Palakkayam 577 82 Malampuzha 585 83 Puduppariyaram 611 84 Pudusseri east 628 VIII Malappuram District 85 Chungathara 636 86 Kurumbalangod 639 87 Vazhikadavu 640 88 Akampadam 641 89 Karulai 642 90 Amarambalam 647 91 Chokkod 655 92 Kalikavu 661 93 Kerala Estate 663 94 Karuvarakundu 674 IX Kozhikod District 95 Kedavoor 687 96 Puthuppadi 688 97 Nellippoyil 690 98 Kodancheri 700 99 Thiruvanbadi 706 100 Chembanoda 712 101 Chakkittappara 713 102 Thinur 715 103 Kavilumpara 716 X Wayanad District 104 Thirunelli 718 105 Thrissilleri 723 106 Periya 724 107 Thondarnad 728 108 Kidangad 730 109 Nulpuzha 733 110 Theriyod 734 111 Achooranam 743 112 Pozhuthana 744 113 Kottappady 745 114 Chundel 748 115 Kunnathidavaka 750 116 Vellarimala 753 XI Kannur District 117 Aralam 758 118 Kottiyur 759 119 Cheruvancherry 763 Recommendations of Three Member Expert Committee on HLWG Report Recommendations of Three Member Expert Committee on “High Level Working Group Report” 1. INTRODUCTION Western Ghats is the second important mountainous area in India after the Himalayas. It affects the climate, atmospheric temperature and soil fertility of the country. Being the treasure trove of Biodiversity, the Western Ghats are essential for the existence of the country. Biodiversity is the basis of all life on earth. As man is an important component in the chain of biodiversity he also has the responsibility to conserve it. When each component of this chain gets lost, the existence of human being also is danger. Biodiversity is a complex subject with multiple dimensions, and hence the issues connected with Western Ghats conservation should be approached with this concept in mind. Western Ghats is one of the eight hottest biodiversity hotspots of the world. 27% of all species present in India are found in the Western Ghats. Many wild relatives of crops such as Pepper, Cardamom, Mango, Jack Fruit and Banana also occur in the Western Ghats. Many rivers and water bodies which are the source of drinking and irrigation for above 250 million people, also originate from the Western Ghats. The Western Ghats also substantially influence the climate of India. The destruction and pollution of the Western Ghats can never be permitted. At the same time, the livelihood and the habitat of people who live in the Western Ghats areas, engaged in activities such as farming for generations should also be protected. It is with this outlook in mind that the three member expert committee has gathered public opinion regarding Kathuri Rangan Report and formulated the recommendations accordingly. Kerala State Biodiversity Board [1] Recommendations of Three Member Expert Committee on HLWG Report 2. GADGIL COMMITTEE REPORT AND KASTHURI RANGAN COMMITTEE REPORT Various research reports revealed that the Western Ghats, which is the abode of a variety of eco systems and organisms is facing biodiversity loss due to the interferences by human beings. Subsequently, Government of India appointed a committee (WGEEP) headed by Prof. Madhav Gadgil. The mandate of the committee was to demarcate ecologically sensitive areas of Western Ghats, declare them and to formulate recommendation for conservation of Western Ghats with people‟s participation. Gadgil Committee started functioning in March 2010 and submitted their report to MoEF in August 2011. The committee divided Western Ghats area as Ecologically Sensitive Zones I, II and III and imposed various degrees of restrictions accordingly. But complaints and grievances were raised by various state governments as well as public and Government of India decided to revaluate the report. In order to revaluate the report and to prepare an action plan for implementation of the recommendations, Government of India appointed a High Level Working Group headed by Dr.K.Kasthuri Rangan vide a Government Order dated 17.08.2012. The mandate of the committee was to suggest measures for preventing loss of the fragile eco system of the Western Ghats. Government directed the Committee to take a consensus approach to protect the interests of people who has been living the Western Ghats area traditionally, while suggesting ways for conservation of ecology and biodiversity of Western Ghats. By this, Government put forward the view that development and people‟s progress will be taken into consideration with the participation of people. Kasthuri Rangan Committee submitted their report on 15, April 2013. In the report, they suggested to demarcate about 40 percent of Western Ghats area as ESA (Ecologically Sensitive Area) and conserve it. Committee found 123 villages in Kerala as ESA. Kasthuri Rangan Committee also pointed out certain defects in demarcation of ESA put forward by ( Gadgil Committee Report. using criteria with incomplete back-up information, identifying ESZs without taking into account human cultural component which is part of biodiversity, livelihood and development needs of human population and the large grid size used for zonation – Page 46 of the report). Kerala State Biodiversity Board [2] Recommendations of Three Member Expert Committee on HLWG Report The decision of Kasthrui Rangan Committee was to solve the issues connected with demarcation of ESA by adopting a scientific as well as logical approach. For this they utilised remote sensing technology. For extracting information regarding biodiversity and fragmentation the committee depended on the data of Department of Space, Govt. of India and Dept. of Biotechnology. This comprehensive data was utilised for finding out the Ecologically Sensitive Area. The Committee divided Western Ghats into “Cultural Landscape” and “Natural Landscape”. Natural Landscape included forests, protected areas and areas which are to be protected as forests, while Cultural Landscape included human inhabited areas, agricultural lands and plantations. The Committee considered the following factors also for demarcating areas as Natural Landscape; richness of biodiversity, fragmentation of forest areas, less human density, presence of protected forests, world heritage sites and elephant and tiger corridors. Each of these factors was given a particular value and Ecologically Sensitive Areas demarcated accordingly. Kasthuri Rangan Committee also adopted the policy that if at least 20 percent area of the village is found to be Ecologically Sensitive Area (ESA), the whole village will be considered as ESA. The Report says that “This approach is much more conservative and indeed meaningful than treating an entire Taluk as ESA” (Page – 57). It is based on these factors that the committee recommended to declare 123 villages in Kerala as ESA. The area of villages and ESAs demarcated by the committee in various states may be seen. Kerala State Biodiversity Board [3] Recommendations of Three Member Expert Committee on HLWG Report In other States area of ESA is less than the Natural Landscape, while in Kerala the area of ESA is higher than that of the Natural Landscape that means a part of the Cultural Landscape including human inhabited areas and agricultural land is in ESA. Naturally, this resulted in lot of complaints from the public. The Kasthuri Rangan Committee has earlier raised many complaints against Gadgil Committee Report. But now the public began to raise the same complaints against Kasthuri Rangan Committee itself. When the Kasthuri Rangan Report was published, many complaints were raised against it by the public, especially farmers. They were of the apprehension that if the areas are declared as ESA, they will be forced to live under strict regulations and development activities will be stand still. Subsequently agitations began in these areas. Under the above circumstances Hon. Chief Minister convened an all party meeting, in which it was decided to resolve the complaints and grievances of people living in these areas. 3. CONSTITUTION OF EXPERT COMMITTEE The mandate of the committee was to study the draft Office Memorandum of MoEF in detail, seek the opinions of people‟s representatives, NGOs, farmer‟s organisations, and general public and to submit their opinions and suggestions to the State Government, which will be further conveyed to the Central Government.