Great Canadian Lagerstätten 4. the Devonian Miguasha Biota

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Great Canadian Lagerstätten 4. the Devonian Miguasha Biota Document généré le 29 sept. 2021 18:57 Geoscience Canada Great Canadian Lagerstätten 4. The Devonian Miguasha Biota (Québec): UNESCO World Heritage Site and a Time Capsule in the Early History of Vertebrates Richard Cloutier Volume 40, numéro 2, 2013 Résumé de l'article Au cours des 170 dernières années, le biote du Dévonien supérieur de URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/geocan40_2ser02 Miguasha de l’Est du Canada a fourni un assemblage aquatique diversifié, comprenant 20 espèces de vertébrés inférieurs (anaspides, ostéostracés, Aller au sommaire du numéro placodermes, acanthodiens, actinoptérygiens et sarcoptérygiens) et un assemblage peu diversifié d’invertébrés ainsi qu’une composante continentale, représentée par des plantes, des scorpions et des mille-pattes. À l’origine Éditeur(s) interprété comme un milieu lacustre d’eau douce, les dernières preuves paléontologiques, taphonomiques, sédimentologiques et géochimiques The Geological Association of Canada confirment un environ-nement saumâtre rappelant celui d’un estuaire. Plus de 18,000 fossiles de poissons ont été découverts montrant différents états de ISSN conservation, notamment en trois dimensions et la préservation de tissus mous. La plupart des vertébrés sont connus par de nombreux spécimens 0315-0941 (imprimé) complets et articulés. Des spécimens de larves et de juvéniles, 1911-4850 (numérique) exceptionnellement bien conservés, ont été identifiées pour 14 des 20 espèces de poissons permettant des études détaillées de leur croissance. De nombreux Découvrir la revue horizons au sein de la Formation d’Escuminac sont inter-prétés soit comme des Konservat– ou Konzentrat–Lagerstätten. Citer cet article Cloutier, R. (2013). Great Canadian Lagerstätten 4. The Devonian Miguasha Biota (Québec): UNESCO World Heritage Site and a Time Capsule in the Early History of Vertebrates. Geoscience Canada, 40(2), 149–163. All rights reserved © The Geological Association of Canada, 2013 Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d’auteur. L’utilisation des services d’Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d’utilisation que vous pouvez consulter en ligne. https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Cet article est diffusé et préservé par Érudit. Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l’Université de Montréal, l’Université Laval et l’Université du Québec à Montréal. Il a pour mission la promotion et la valorisation de la recherche. https://www.erudit.org/fr/ GEOSCIENCE CANADA Volume 40 2013 149 SERIES cal, taphonomic, sedimentological and niles, exceptionnellement bien geochemical evidence corroborates a conservés, ont été identifiées pour 14 brackish estuarine setting. Over 18,000 des 20 espèces de poissons permettant fish specimens have been recovered des études détaillées de leur croissance. showing various modes of fossiliza- De nombreux horizons au sein de la tion, including uncompressed material Formation d’Escuminac sont inter- and soft-tissue preservation. Most ver- prétés soit comme des Konservat– ou tebrates are known from numerous, Konzentrat–Lagerstätten. complete, articulated specimens. Exceptionally well-preserved larval and HISTORICAL OVERVIEW juvenile specimens have been identified The Miguasha fossil site in eastern Québec was among the first major Great Canadian for 14 out of the 20 species of fishes, allowing growth studies. Numerous paleontological localities to have been Lagerstätten 4. horizons within the Escuminac Forma- discovered and excavated in North America. The discovery of the first The Devonian Miguasha tion are now interpreted as either Kon- servat– or Konzentrat–Lagerstätten. fossils at Miguasha was made in 1842 Biota (Québec): UNESCO by Abraham Gesner, the government geologist in New Brunswick, also SOMMAIRE World Heritage Site and a known for his work on the distillation Au cours des 170 dernières années, le of kerosene. While surveying the Time Capsule in the Early biote du Dévonien supérieur de Migua- northern part of New Brunswick for History of Vertebrates sha de l’Est du Canada a fourni un coal, Gesner came to Miguasha and assemblage aquatique diversifié, com- reported “I found the remains of fish, Richard Cloutier prenant 20 espèces de vertébrés infé- and a small species of tortoise with Département de Biologie, Chimie et rieurs (anaspides, ostéostracés, placo- foot-marks” (Gesner 1843, p. 64). Evi- Géographie dermes, acanthodiens, actinoptérygiens dently, this fossil was not a tortoise but Université du Québec à Rimouski et sarcoptérygiens) et un assemblage rather a placoderm fish, most likely 300 allée des Ursulines peu diversifié d’invertébrés ainsi qu’une Bothriolepis canadensis, one of the most Rimouski, QC, Canada, G5L 3A1 composante continentale, représentée common fish from the Escuminac For- Email: [email protected] par des plantes, des scorpions et des mation. Although fossil plants were mille-pattes. À l’origine interprété found, there was no potential in terms SUMMARY comme un milieu lacustre d’eau douce, of coal mining, and the site was for- Over the past 170 years, the Late les dernières preuves paléontologiques, gotten for more than 30 years. Devonian Miguasha biota from eastern taphonomiques, sédimentologiques et Between 1879 and 1881, the Canada has yielded a diverse aquatic géochimiques confirment un environ- Geological Survey of Canada organ- assemblage including 20 species of nement saumâtre rappelant celui d’un ized several expeditions to Miguasha lower vertebrates (anaspids, osteostra- estuaire. Plus de 18,000 fossiles de lead by R. W. Ells (Fig. 1a), A. H. cans, placoderms, acanthodians, poissons ont été découverts montrant Foord and T. C. Weston. A few dozens actinopterygians and sarcopterygians), différents états de conservation, of collected fossils were given to pio- a more limited invertebrate assemblage, notamment en trois dimensions et la neer paleontologists: Joseph F. and a continental component including préservation de tissus mous. La plupart Whiteaves, a British paleontologist plants, scorpions and millipedes. Origi- des vertébrés sont connus par de nom- working at the Geological Survey of nally interpreted as a freshwater lacus- breux spécimens complets et articulés. Canada, who studied the fossil fishes, trine environment, recent paleontologi- Des spécimens de larves et de juvé- and Sir J. William Dawson, a Canadian Geoscience Canada, v. 40, http://dx.doi.org/10.12789/geocanj.2013.40.008 © 2013 GAC/AGC® 150 Figure 1. Fossil collecting at the Miguasha site through time. a. Geologist Robert Wheelock Ells, from the Geological Survey of Canada, re-discoverer of the Miguasha fossil site in the summer of 1879 and one of the first fossil collectors in Miguasha (Pho- tograph: Geological Survey of Canada). b. Local collector Joseph Landry in the late 1930s, displaying fossiliferous concretions (Photography: Archive René Bureau, Parc national de Miguasha). c. René Bureau’s 1963 expedition in Miguasha, collecting in the cliffs with the help of local collectors Ralph Plourde (son, left) and Euclide Plourde (father, centre) (Photograph: Claude Bureau). d. Recent systematic collecting performed by personnel of the Parc national de Miguasha (Photograph: Johanne Kerr). paleobotanist working at McGill Uni- olepiform Eusthenopteron foordi from 1937 and 1998, Erik Jarvik wrote some versity, who looked at the fossil plants. Miguasha had a fin anatomy similar to thirty scientific articles on These workers were the authors of the that of the limbs of stegocephalians Eusthenopteron (Cloutier 1996c), while first scientific descriptions of the (Cope 1892), a paraphyletic group Erik Stensiö published on the detailed Miguasha fossils (Whiteaves 1880; acknowledged today to include stem anatomy of the placoderm Bothriolepis Dawson 1882). From the late 1880s tetrapods. Fossils from Miguasha there- (Stensiö 1948). until the 1940s, British and American by made their entrance to studies doc- The history of the Miguasha paleontologists came to Miguasha (fre- umenting the origin and evolution of biota can also be tracked through the quently referred to mistakenly as Scau- major groups of vertebrates, a perspec- sequence of scientific publications and menac Bay) in order to collect new tive fairly new at the time, considering the date of original descriptions for the material for major museums, such as the Darwinian revolution. Following various vertebrate species (Fig. 2). the British Museum of Natural History Cope’s (1892) publication, From 1880 to 1900, half of the known (London, England), the Royal Scottish Eusthenopteron foordi was considered a vertebrate diversity had been described Museum of Edinburgh (Scotland) and key species in the transition from fish- on the basis of original collecting in the American Museum of Natural His- es to tetrapods, thus promoting the Miguasha. Between 1900 and 1924, tory (New York, USA). From 1887 to focus of numerous studies on the most likely as a result of global social 1892, M. Jex collected an impressive anatomy of its paired fins, vertebral instability and World War I, paleonto- array of fossil fishes in Miguasha, column and nostrils. Between 1905 and logical research, including that on the which he sold to different museums in 1993, local collectors (Fig. 1b–c) famil- Miguasha biota, was not a priority in the United Kingdom. As a result, part iar with fossil fish hunting in Miguasha the scientific community. Renewed and counterpart of the same fossils were pivotal in creating reference col- interest in
Recommended publications
  • Hans-Peter Schultze, a Great Paleoichthyologist for Whom Work Is Synonymous with Enjoyment
    Mitt. Mus. Nat.kd. Berl., Geowiss. Reihe 5 (2002) 5-17 10.11.2002 Hans-Peter Schultze, a great paleoichthyologist for whom work is synonymous with enjoyment Richard Cloutierl With 4 figures and 2 tables In the summer of 1982, Hans-Peter Schultze and above all by his simplicity and friendliness. Two Gloria Arratia were invited to a small museum years later I started my PbD. at The University located on a fossiliferous site of the Devonian of Kansas, under the supervision of Hans-Peter. Escuminac Formation in Miguasha, Quebec, Compared to his long career, these two weeks eastern Canada. Hans-Peter was to work with that Hans-Peter spent in Miguasha represent an Marius Arsenault, the director of the Miguasha extremely short period of time. Some might say Museum, on the skull of the elpistostegalid EZ- that this little anecdote is insignificant when in- pistostege watsoni, a species closely related to ba- troducing a vertebrate paleontologist (Fig. ZA) sal tetrapods. In addition, he went through the who published 132 papers and books (a total of collections to describe and measure numerous 2977 published pages) in addition to more than juvenile specimens of the osteolepiform Eusthe- 80 abstracts, book reviews and obituaries. How- nopteron foordi. As expected, these two projects ever, this brief story is representative of Hans- turned out to be important contributions in low- Peter’s personality and contributions. He is a er vertebrate paleontology and systematics: one great scientist with numerous interests in science, on the origin of tetrapods (1985), and the second art, and history. Hans-Peter enjoys digging for one on growth patterns of a Late Devonian fish fossils, looking at fossils and describing fossils, (1984).
    [Show full text]
  • I Ecomorphological Change in Lobe-Finned Fishes (Sarcopterygii
    Ecomorphological change in lobe-finned fishes (Sarcopterygii): disparity and rates by Bryan H. Juarez A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Ecology and Evolutionary Biology) in the University of Michigan 2015 Master’s Thesis Committee: Assistant Professor Lauren C. Sallan, University of Pennsylvania, Co-Chair Assistant Professor Daniel L. Rabosky, Co-Chair Associate Research Scientist Miriam L. Zelditch i © Bryan H. Juarez 2015 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the Rabosky Lab, David W. Bapst, Graeme T. Lloyd and Zerina Johanson for helpful discussions on methodology, Lauren C. Sallan, Miriam L. Zelditch and Daniel L. Rabosky for their dedicated guidance on this study and the London Natural History Museum for courteously providing me with access to specimens. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF APPENDICES v ABSTRACT vi SECTION I. Introduction 1 II. Methods 4 III. Results 9 IV. Discussion 16 V. Conclusion 20 VI. Future Directions 21 APPENDICES 23 REFERENCES 62 iv LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES TABLE/FIGURE II. Cranial PC-reduced data 6 II. Post-cranial PC-reduced data 6 III. PC1 and PC2 Cranial and Post-cranial Morphospaces 11-12 III. Cranial Disparity Through Time 13 III. Post-cranial Disparity Through Time 14 III. Cranial/Post-cranial Disparity Through Time 15 v LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A. Aquatic and Semi-aquatic Lobe-fins 24 B. Species Used In Analysis 34 C. Cranial and Post-Cranial Landmarks 37 D. PC3 and PC4 Cranial and Post-cranial Morphospaces 38 E. PC1 PC2 Cranial Morphospaces 39 1-2.
    [Show full text]
  • 1651 Chevrinais.Vp
    Early establishment of vertebrate trophic interactions: Food web structure in Middle to Late Devonian fish assemblages with exceptional fossilization MARION CHEVRINAIS,CLAIRE JACQUET & RICHARD CLOUTIER In past and present ecosystems, trophic interactions determine material and energy transfers among species, regulating population dynamics and community stability. Food web studies in past ecosystems are helpful to assess the persistence of ecosystem structure throughout geological times and to explore the existence of general principles of food web assem- bly. We determined and compared the trophic structure of two Devonian fish assemblages [(1) the Escuminac assem- blage (ca. 380 Ma), Miguasha, eastern Canada and (2) the Lode assemblage (ca. 390 Ma), Straupe, Latvia] with a closer look at the Escuminac assemblage. Both localities are representative of Middle to Late Devonian aquatic vertebrate as- semblages in terms of taxonomic richness (ca. 20 species), phylogenetic diversity (all major groups of lower vertebrates) and palaeoenvironment (palaeoestuaries). Fossil food web structures were assessed using different kinds of direct (i.e. digestive contents and bite marks in fossils) and indirect (e.g. ecomorphological measurements, stratigraphic species co-occurrences) indicators. First, the relationships between predator and prey body size established for the Escuminac fishes are comparable to those of recent aquatic ecosystems, highlighting a consistency of aquatic food web structure across geological time. Second, non-metric dimensional scaling on ecomorphological variables and cluster analysis showed a common pattern of functional groups for both fish assemblages; top predators, predators, primary and second- ary consumers were identified. We conclude that Devonian communities were organized in multiple trophic levels and that size-based feeding interactions were established early in vertebrate history.
    [Show full text]
  • Heterochronic Evolution Explains Novel Body Shape in a Triassic
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Heterochronic evolution explains novel body shape in a Triassic coelacanth from Switzerland Received: 5 June 2017 Lionel Cavin 1, Bastien Mennecart 2, Christian Obrist3, Loïc Costeur2 & Heinz Furrer4 Accepted: 2 October 2017 A bizarre latimeriid coelacanth fsh from the Middle Triassic of Switzerland shows skeletal features Published: xx xx xxxx deviating from the uniform anatomy of coelacanths. The new form is closely related to a modern- looking coelacanth found in the same locality and diferences between both are attributed to heterochronic evolution. Most of the modifed osteological structures in the new coelacanth have their developmental origin in the skull/trunk interface region in the embryo. Change in the expression of developmental patterning genes, specifcally the Pax1/9 genes, may explain a rapid evolution at the origin of the new coelacanth. This species broadens the morphological disparity range within the lineage of these ‘living fossils’ and exemplifes a case of rapid heterochronic evolution likely trigged by minor changes in gene expression. Coelacanth fshes, or actinistians, are represented by the living genus Latimeria and by about 50 extinct genera ranging from the Early Devonian to the Late Cretaceous. Te extant coelacanths are commonly qualifed as ‘liv- ing fossils’ because of the monotonous morphological disparity they display during their evolutionary history. Indeed anatomically modern coelacanths are known since the Early Devonian1 and only a few morphological deviating genera are recorded in the Middle – Late Devonian and in the Early Carboniferous2. Here, we describe a coelacanth from the Middle Triassic of Switzerland which shows highly derived anatomical features in the posterior moiety of the skull, the pectoral girdle and the lower jaw.
    [Show full text]
  • Coelacanth from Rsenbeck
    Fossil Record 13 (2) 2010, 309–316 / DOI 10.1002/mmng.201000004 A juvenile Early Carboniferous (Visan) coelacanth from Rsenbeck (Rhenish Mountains, Germany) with derived postcranial characters Florian Witzmann*, Markus Dorka and Dieter Korn Museum fr Naturkunde Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract Received 8 November 2009 A small coelacanth specimen of Visan age from a newly described locality near R- Accepted 29 January 2010 senbeck at the northern margin of the Rhenish Mountains (North Rhine-Westphalia, Published 3 August 2010 Germany) is described. The head and pectoral girdle are not preserved, however, the specimen can be distinguished from all other known Carboniferous coelacanths by de- Key Words rived characters of the articulated postcranial skeleton. Derived characters include: (1) The slender first and second dorsal fins that carry only seven to eight and six fin Sarcopterygii rays, respectively. (2) Both the pelvic and anal fin have a broad base and are unusually Brilon Anticline weakly lobed. (3) The fin rays of the second dorsal fin are much more robust than lobed fins those of the first dorsal fin. (4) The second dorsal and anal fins are longer than the Palaeozoic first dorsal and pelvic fins. The Rsenbeck coelacanth is interpreted as a juvenile spe- postcranium cimen, since the basal plates that support the fins are not ossified. Introduction France, Belgium, and the Netherlands (Keller 1934; Forey 1991). Coelacanth fishes are a rare component of faunal as- (3) Rhabdoderma stensioei (Aldinger, 1931) (‘Coela- semblages in Carboniferous strata of Germany, first re- canthus stensii’) from the ‘Namurian A (E1)’ of ported by Aldinger (1931) and Keller (1934).
    [Show full text]
  • Dobrogeria Aegyssensis, a New Early Spathian (Early Triassic) Coelacanth from North Dobrogea (Romania)
    DE DE GRUYTER Acta Geologica Polonica, Vol. 64 (2014), No. 2, pp. 161–187 OPEN DOI: 10.2478/agp-2014-0010 G Dobrogeria aegyssensis, a new early Spathian (Early Triassic) coelacanth from North Dobrogea (Romania) LIONEL CAVIN1 AND EUGEN GRĂDINARU2 1Department of Geology and Palaeontology, Natural History Museum, CP 6434, 1211 Geneva 6, Switzerland. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Geology, Faculty of Geology and Geophysics, University of Bucharest, Blvd. Bălcescu Nicolae 1, RO-010041 Bucharest, Romania. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: Cavin, L. and Grădinaru, E. 2014. Dobrogeria aegyssensis, a new early Spathian (Early Triassic) coelacanth from North Dobrogea (Romania). Acta Geologica Polonica, 64 (2), 161–187. Warszawa. The Early Triassic witnessed the highest taxic diversity of coelacanths (or Actinistia), a clade with a single liv- ing genus today. This peak of diversity is accentuated here with the description of a new coelacanth discovered in the lower Spathian (Upper Olenekian, Lower Triassic) cropping out in the Tulcea Veche (Old Tulcea) promon- tory, in the city of Tulcea, in North Dobrogea, Romania. The bone remains were preserved in a block of limestone, which was chemically dissolved. The resulting 3D and matrix-free ossifications correspond mostly to elements of the skull and branchial apparatus. Posterior parietals, postparietal with associated prootic and basisphenoid allow a precise description of the neurocranium. Ossifications of the lower jaw, together with branchial and pec- toral elements, complete the description of this coelacanth and support the coining of a new generic and specific name, Dobrogeria aegyssensis. A phylogenetic analysis of actinistians with the new species recovers clades which were found in most recent analyses, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Universidade Do Estado Do Rio De Janeiro Centro Biomédico Instituto De Biologia Roberto Alcântara Gomes
    Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Centro Biomédico Instituto de Biologia Roberto Alcântara Gomes Raphael Miguel da Silva Biogeografia Histórica de Celacantos (Sarcopterygii: Actinistia) Rio de Janeiro 2016 Raphael Miguel da Silva Biogeografia Histórica de Celacantos (Sarcopterygii: Actinistia) Tese apresentada, como requisito parcial para obtenção do título de Doutor, ao Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Evolução, da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Orientadora: Prof.a Dra. Valéria Gallo da Silva Rio de Janeiro 2016 CATALOGAÇÃO NA FONTE UERJ / REDE SIRIUS / BIBLIOTECA CTC-A SS586XXX Silva, Raphael Miguel da. Biogeografia histórica de Celacantos (Sarcopterygii: Actinistia) / Raphael Miguel da Silva. - 2016. 271 f. : il. Orientador: Valéria Gallo da Silva. Tese (Doutorado em Ecologia e Evolução) - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Biologia Roberto Alcântara Gomes. 1. Biologia marinha - Teses. 2. Peixe – Teses. I. Silva, Valéria Gallo. II. Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Biologia Roberto Alcântara Gomes. III. Título. CDU 504.4 Autorizo para fins acadêmicos e científicos, a reprodução total ou parcial desta tese, desde que citada a fonte. ___________________________ ________________________ Assinatura Data Raphael Miguel da Silva Biogeografia Histórica de Celacantos (Sarcopterygii: Actinistia) Tese apresentada, como requisito parcial para obtenção do título de Doutor, ao Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Evolução, da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Aprovada em 15 de fevereiro de 2016. Orientadora: Prof.a Dra. Valéria Gallo da Silva Instituto de Biologia Roberto Alcantara Gomes - UERJ Banca Examinadora: ____________________________________________ Prof. Dr. Paulo Marques Machado Brito Instituto de Biologia Roberto Alcantara Gomes - UERJ ____________________________________________ Prof.ª Dra.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    Acta Geologica Polonica, Vol. 64 (2014), No. 2, pp. 161–187 DOI: 10.2478/agp-2014-0010 Dobrogeria aegyssensis, a new early Spathian (Early Triassic) coelacanth from North Dobrogea (Romania) LIONEL CAVIN1 AND EUGEN GRĂDINARU2 1Department of Geology and Palaeontology, Natural History Museum, CP 6434, 1211 Geneva 6, Switzerland. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Geology, Faculty of Geology and Geophysics, University of Bucharest, Blvd. Bălcescu Nicolae 1, RO-010041 Bucharest, Romania. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: Cavin, L. and Grădinaru, E. 2014. Dobrogeria aegyssensis, a new early Spathian (Early Triassic) coelacanth from North Dobrogea (Romania). Acta Geologica Polonica, 64 (2), 161–187. Warszawa. The Early Triassic witnessed the highest taxic diversity of coelacanths (or Actinistia), a clade with a single liv- ing genus today. This peak of diversity is accentuated here with the description of a new coelacanth discovered in the lower Spathian (Upper Olenekian, Lower Triassic) cropping out in the Tulcea Veche (Old Tulcea) promon- tory, in the city of Tulcea, in North Dobrogea, Romania. The bone remains were preserved in a block of limestone, which was chemically dissolved. The resulting 3D and matrix-free ossifications correspond mostly to elements of the skull and branchial apparatus. Posterior parietals, postparietal with associated prootic and basisphenoid allow a precise description of the neurocranium. Ossifications of the lower jaw, together with branchial and pec- toral elements, complete the description of this coelacanth and support the coining of a new generic and specific name, Dobrogeria aegyssensis. A phylogenetic analysis of actinistians with the new species recovers clades which were found in most recent analyses, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Family-Group Names of Fossil Fishes
    European Journal of Taxonomy 466: 1–167 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2018.466 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2018 · Van der Laan R. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1F74D019-D13C-426F-835A-24A9A1126C55 Family-group names of fossil fishes Richard VAN DER LAAN Grasmeent 80, 1357JJ Almere, The Netherlands. Email: [email protected] urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:55EA63EE-63FD-49E6-A216-A6D2BEB91B82 Abstract. The family-group names of animals (superfamily, family, subfamily, supertribe, tribe and subtribe) are regulated by the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Particularly, the family names are very important, because they are among the most widely used of all technical animal names. A uniform name and spelling are essential for the location of information. To facilitate this, a list of family- group names for fossil fishes has been compiled. I use the concept ‘Fishes’ in the usual sense, i.e., starting with the Agnatha up to the †Osteolepidiformes. All the family-group names proposed for fossil fishes found to date are listed, together with their author(s) and year of publication. The main goal of the list is to contribute to the usage of the correct family-group names for fossil fishes with a uniform spelling and to list the author(s) and date of those names. No valid family-group name description could be located for the following family-group names currently in usage: †Brindabellaspidae, †Diabolepididae, †Dorsetichthyidae, †Erichalcidae, †Holodipteridae, †Kentuckiidae, †Lepidaspididae, †Loganelliidae and †Pituriaspididae. Keywords. Nomenclature, ICZN, Vertebrata, Agnatha, Gnathostomata.
    [Show full text]
  • Earliest Known Coelacanth Skull Extends the Range of Anatomically Modern Coelacanths to the Early Devonian
    ARTICLE Received 9 Jan 2012 | Accepted 29 Feb 2012 | Published 10 Apr 2012 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1764 Earliest known coelacanth skull extends the range of anatomically modern coelacanths to the Early Devonian Min Zhu1, Xiaobo Yu1,2, Jing Lu1, Tuo Qiao1, Wenjin Zhao1 & Liantao Jia1 Coelacanths are known for their evolutionary conservatism, and the body plan seen in Latimeria can be traced to late Middle Devonian Diplocercides, Holopterygius and presumably Euporosteus. However, the group’s early history is unclear because of an incomplete fossil record. Until now, the only Early Devonian coelacanth is an isolated dentary (Eoactinistia) from Australia, whose position within the coelacanths is unknown. Here we report the earliest known coelacanth skull (Euporosteus yunnanensis sp. nov.) from the Early Devonian (late Pragian) of Yunnan, China. Resolved by maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses as crownward of Diplocercides or as its sister taxon, the new form extends the chronological range of anatomically modern coelacanths by about 17 Myr. The finding lends support to the possibility that Eoactinistia is also an anatomically modern coelacanth, and provides a more refined reference point for studying the rapid early diversification and subsequent evolutionary conservatism of the coelacanths. 1 Key Laboratory of Evolutionary Systematics of Vertebrates, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiwaidajie 142, PO Box 643, Beijing 100044, China. 2 Department of Biological Sciences, Kean University, Union, New Jersey, USA. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to M.Z. (email: [email protected]). NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 3:772 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1764 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications © 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • S1 Appendix. Phylogenetic Analysis of Early Gnathostomes. List of Characters, Coding Matrix and Results
    S1 Appendix. Phylogenetic analysis of early gnathostomes. List of characters, coding matrix and results. List of characters (modified from [1]): Modifications were made on 36 characters from the original data matrix from [1]: 16 characters have been rephrased (characters 9, 18, 19, 26, 31, 51, 81, 160, 177, 182, 190, 191, 241, 242, 257, 258), seven characters have been redefined (characters 7, 8, 149, 167, 195, 246, 260), 12 characters have been re-polarized (characters 7, 8, 11, 13, 104, 149, 167, 195, 196, 209, 246, 252), uninforma- tive character 261 has been removed and six characters have been added (characters 262-267). 1. Tesselate prismatic calcified cartilage: absent (0); present (1). In contrast to [1], but in agreement with [2], Doliodus has been re-coded as (1). 2. Perichondral bone: present (0); absent (1). Perichondral bone is present in osteostracans ([3,4,5]; contra [2]). Character 2 is coded as (0) for the Osteostraci. Since the presence of perichondral bone is ambiguous in galeaspids [see [6] versus Zhu et Janvier (1998)], the Galeaspida is coded as (?). Miguashaia is coded as (0). Diplacanthus and Rhadinacanthus have been coded as (0) because perichondral ossification has been described in their scapulocoracoid [1]. 3. Extensive endochondral ossification: absent (0); present (1). Because of the morphological incompleteness Diabolepis, Styloichthys, Youngolepis, Psarolepis and Meemannia have to be coded as (?) rather than (1). Miguashaia and Cheirolepis are coded as (1). 4. Dentine: absent (0); present (1). Dentine is absent in the Galeaspida [6] but present in the Osteostraci [5]. Homalacanthus and Tri- azeugacanthus are coded as (1).
    [Show full text]
  • Family-Group Names of Fossil Fishes
    © European Journal of Taxonomy; download unter http://www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu; www.zobodat.at European Journal of Taxonomy 466: 1–167 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2018.466 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2018 · Van der Laan R. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1F74D019-D13C-426F-835A-24A9A1126C55 Family-group names of fossil fi shes Richard VAN DER LAAN Grasmeent 80, 1357JJ Almere, The Netherlands. Email: [email protected] urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:55EA63EE-63FD-49E6-A216-A6D2BEB91B82 Abstract. The family-group names of animals (superfamily, family, subfamily, supertribe, tribe and subtribe) are regulated by the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Particularly, the family names are very important, because they are among the most widely used of all technical animal names. A uniform name and spelling are essential for the location of information. To facilitate this, a list of family- group names for fossil fi shes has been compiled. I use the concept ‘Fishes’ in the usual sense, i.e., starting with the Agnatha up to the †Osteolepidiformes. All the family-group names proposed for fossil fi shes found to date are listed, together with their author(s) and year of publication. The main goal of the list is to contribute to the usage of the correct family-group names for fossil fi shes with a uniform spelling and to list the author(s) and date of those names. No valid family-group name description could be located for the following family-group names currently in usage: †Brindabellaspidae, †Diabolepididae, †Dorsetichthyidae, †Erichalcidae, †Holodipteridae, †Kentuckiidae, †Lepidaspididae, †Loganelliidae and †Pituriaspididae.
    [Show full text]