NEWSLETTER Winter 2018 Vol

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NEWSLETTER Winter 2018 Vol NEWSLETTER Winter 2018 Vol. 15, Issue 1 At Long Last, MTA Prepares Individual To Replace the Metrocard Highlights By Andrew Albert problems. Many Metrocard paid by credit or debit card - you users have encountered the were good, if you didn’t - you’re Introduced in the 1990s, New “swipe again” or “swipe again out of luck. And of course, the York’s ubiquitous Metrocard— here” message, thus causing Metrocard did you no good if you long the symbol of New York, and frustration not only for the rode the commuter rails—Metro- Uncertainty Rides the the butt of many jokes (so-and-so user, but those lined up at the North or the Long Island Rail Rails in NJ p. 2 didn’t know how to swipe, etc.)— turnstiles behind. Many transit Road. Sure, you could purchase will soon go the way of the token. users have also encountered a monthly pass on the railroads From New Mexico (And Of course, “soon” depends on “dirty” turnstile slots, which which had a Metrocard on the your definition, as the Metrocard damage the delicate electronic reverse side - but the subway user the U.S.) p. 4 will still be around during the stripe on the Metrocard, causing couldn’t upgrade their Metrocard introduction of the new contactless it to malfunction, or have to be to allow use on the railroads. And Canada Report tap card, as yet unnamed. replaced. the MTA had to pay employees Winter 2018 p. 5 to clean the turnstile slots that It’s about time. The Metrocard Then there’s the issue of the Metrocards slid through, or Delays Plague 2017’s has outlived its usefulness in damaged cards, as well as what to damage to cards would occur. many ways. This is not to do when your card is lost/stolen. And –leave it to enterprising New New Starts p. 6 say it was without merit—it If you’ve remembered to jot down Yorkers—some figured out that allowed for many useful and the serial # of your card, then if you bent the card in a certain Passenger Rail Advoca- important fare options that good. If you haven’t—and paid fashion, you could wrangle a cy Changing p. 7 the token did not—but it’s also with cash—you’re out of luck. couple of extra rides out of it! not to say there haven’t been If it was a monthly card and you ( Continued on page 3) FRA Designates Rail Amtrak Cascades Expansion Pending Safety Week p. 8 By Lloyd H. Flem predicted, including larger picturesque water –level route MN’s Passenger-Train numbers of business travelers. skirting Puget Sound, replaced Wish List p. 9 On Dec. 18, the Seattle- In addition to the two new by a more direct, but far-less Portland segment of the Talgo- round trips, considerable aesthetic inland run between Stark County Transit’s built Amtrak Cascades trains improvements on the BNSF Olympia and Tacoma. Also will add two round trips, giving Main north-south line within new environmentally-friendly Eco-Leadership p. 12 a total of six, all during daytime the state of Washington, which Charger locomotives, built in hours. The six, plus the Coast benefits freight as well as Sacramento, will increase on- Renewed Interest in Ex- Starlight, mean that intercity passenger service, have been time reliability. Finally, Tacoma panding Seasonal New rail passenger service between completed. will have a new Amtrak station England Service p. 13 the two rapidly-growing, immediately adjacent to light economically-prosperous A decrease in scheduled run and commuter rail, intercity metro areas in the American time of 10 minutes will also bus and local transit bus. Pacific Northwest can be seen occur on Dec. 18. All Aboard Much of the funding for these as constituting a viable rail Washington (AAWA) feels the improvements and expansions corridor. With the increasingly decrease is too modest, given came from President Obama’s unpleasant experience of I-5 the infrastructure improvements ARRA “High Speed Rail” traffic, major growth in train made. In addition, all passenger (HSR) money. ridership in that corridor is trains will be leaving the (Continued on page 7) RAIL USERS’ NETWORK NEWSLETTER Page 2 of 16 Uncertainty Rides the Rails at New Jersey Transit By David Peter Alan question is whether or not there will be new support for the agency had been reduced tunnels in service before the old ones must be by 90% from 2007-08 levels in 2014-15. New Jersey’s rail riders face an uncertain shut down, if that is actually necessary. For this year, it is about one third of the future, along with their transportation level of a decade ago, but these funding provider, New Jersey Transit (NJT). They Amtrak’s plan is the Gateway Project, a mega- cuts have translated into service cuts, face a number of uncertainties on several project first proposed in 2011. Gateway includes which means less mobility. Continued fronts, from chronic funding shortages at two new tunnels, two new bridges to replace uncertainty over funding means continued NJT, to not being sure whether the train the aging Portal Bridge over the Hackensack uncertainty over whether any particular they want to take will run on any given day. River, and improvements at Penn Station. It train will be removed from the schedule. also includes a new stub-end terminal called There was uncertainty on the Morris & Essex “Penn South” for NJT trains, new infrastructure There is also uncertainty about NJT’s (M&E) Line at the beginning of the summer, as in Secaucus, NJ and a loop that would render relationship with Amtrak. NJT has not paid NJT announced that there would be no weekday the current Secaucus station (which opened for its assessment to Amtrak for the use of the trains on that line to or from Penn Station, New service in 2003 and cost $600 million to build) Northeast Corridor (NEC) between Trenton York (except for a few early-morning arrivals) for obsolete. Amtrak claims that Gateway can be and Penn Station, New York. As a result, eight weeks. The trains were sent to the historic completed by 2030; only a few short years before Amtrak has stopped work on projects along Hoboken Terminal instead. NJT cut Hoboken it says the existing tunnels must be shut down for the line that would benefit NJT’s riders. Mayor fares in half for the duration and threw in free repairs. Some advocates believe this deadline to J. Christian Bollwage of Elizabeth complained connections to Manhattan on PATH (Port be too close for comfort. that the dispute between the two railroads has Authority Trans Hudson) trains or ferries. The halted construction of a new station in his riders suffered some inconvenience, but NJT Those advocates, including the Lackawanna city, which is located on the NEC, but where planned and executed its plan well, so there was a Coalition, are concerned about the cost of Amtrak trains do not stop. He also expressed general consensus that the summer could have been Gateway, which is now estimated at close the hope that the incoming administration in much worse. That uncertainty had been resolved. to $30 billion. They do not believe that a Trenton can resolve the situation. fiscally-conservative Republican government When the M&E trains returned to Penn will spend half of that amount, which is Some of these uncertainties may be resolved Station, other uncertainties remained, roughly half of the money available for transit next year, although some transit managers and they have not gone away. There is a projects around the country, for a project that are facing a new uncertainty. New Jersey shortage of engineers at NJT, which has will benefit a Democratic stronghold like the is getting a new governor, Democrat Phil caused some trains to be canceled. This New York area. They also doubt that there is Murphy. Both houses of the legislature have writer and many other riders have had enough “local” money available to pay for the Democratic majorities, so Murphy should occasions when the trains we expected to local funding match. They propose a “Plan B” be able to implement policies easily. During catch did not run, so we had to wait for that includes new tunnels, a single new bridge the campaign, Murphy complained about the next train. Outside peak-commuting and the improvements at Penn Station, but the leadership at NJT, so advocates expect hours, that meant an extra hour of waiting not “Penn South” or the other infrastructure, to see some new faces at the agency next time. If an “inbound” train is canceled, which they deem unnecessary and possibly year. Whether any such changes will be far- the consequences could be much worse, undesirable. These advocates say that their reaching, or merely cosmetic, is anyone’s guess. like missing appointments. Labor and scaled-down plan is affordable, and will That is a new uncertainty for riders, while management are blaming each other, provide enough capacity into Penn Station. some managers are uncertain about whether while the biggest losers are the riders. They criticize Gateway for not promising or not they will keep their jobs after the new to provide such capacity until the all of it is administration takes office in January. In the long run, there is uncertainty about completed, which might not happen before how NJT riders will get into New York’s the existing tunnels are taken out of service. Riders and their advocates are also uncertain Penn Station in the future. The tunnels under They are beginning to think about a “Plan C” about whether there will be more funding for the the Hudson River flooded in 2012, when to get commuters into Manhattan, even if a operating side of NJT, now that the Democrats Hurricane Sandy struck.
Recommended publications
  • Master HSIPR Selection Sheet 030413 Updates.Xlsx
    FRA High‐Speed Intercity Passenger Rail (HSIPR) Program Updated 3/4/2013 Funding Selection Summary (Sorted by State Abbreviation, Funding Source, and Project Type) Funding Potential Estimated State Project Type Project Name Project Summary Source Funding* Alabama ‐ Total Funding Amount: $200,000 AL FY 2009 Planning Project New Passenger Rail Service in Alabama Completion of a feasibility study to restore intercity passenger rail service from Birmingham to Montgomery to Mobile, AL.$ 200,000 Amtrak ‐ Total Funding Amount: $449,944,000 This project will boost capacity, reliability, and speed in one of the most heavily used sections of the Northeast Corridor (NEC). The project will create a 24 mile segment of track between New Brunswick and Trenton, NJ capable of 160 mph train operations with high‐tension catenary, upgraded electric Amtrak ARRA Corridor Program NEC Power, Signal, Track, Catenary Improvements power facilities, and high‐speed rail interlockings that allow express trains to overtake and pass local trains, reducing delays that often affect this track $ 449,944,000 section. In addition, this project makes related track and interlocking investments between Trenton, NJ and Morrisville, PA and at New York Penn Station. The upgraded power facilities will reduce power failures, which are frequently experienced on this segment of the NEC. California ‐ Total Funding Amount: $4,243,143,231 This project encompasses the purchase of 15 passenger rail cars and 4 locomotives for use on the Pacific Surfliner, San Joaquin, and Capitol Corridors in California. These new cars and locomotives will be compliant with standards for equipment that can travel at speeds up to 125 mph established Next Generation Passenger Rail Equipment CA ‐ DOT ARRA Corridor Program pursuant to Section 305 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • 0.2 Executive Summary
    2010 Montana State Rail Plan Executive Summary The 2010 Montana State Rail Plan describes historical and forecasted freight trends, provides operating and system characteristics of the State’s freight rail system, and summarizes ongoing efforts to expand and secure funding for addi- tional passenger rail service through the State. The Plan also describes the impact of grain facility consolidation; identifies potential rail funding programs to acquire, improve, establish, or rehabilitate intermodal rail equipment or facili- ties; and lists several other ongoing issues affecting rail service in Montana, such as rail competition and growing freight volumes. The following sections sum- marize the key topics in each chapter of the 2010 Montana State Rail Plan. FREIGHT TRENDS As consumer demand for goods has increased over the past several decades, freight service demand has grown along with it (Figure ES.1). In 2005, over 4.5 trillion ton-miles of freight were shipped in the United States – about 15,300 ton- miles per capita. Rail transportation, the fastest growing among the freight modes, represented the largest share (38 percent) of the freight ton-miles shipped in the United States. National increases in freight volume between 2002 and 2035 are generally balanced among modes, and increases in volume will be strongest in intermodal and truck movements. In Montana, growth in freight volume and value is concentrated in truck and intermodal movements, as rail shipments of coal and agricultural products are not expected to expand dramatically in vol- ume or value. This section of the report has extensive data on the modal shares of freight in Montana.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 2 Progress Since the Last PMT
    CHAPTER 2 Progress Since the Last PMT The 2003 PMT outlined the actions needed to bring the MBTA transit system into a state of good repair (SGR). It evaluated and prioritized a number of specific enhancement and expansion projects proposed to improve the system and better serve the regional mobility needs of Commonwealth residents. In the inter- vening years, the MBTA has funded and implemented many of the 2003 PMT priorities. The transit improvements highlighted in this chapter have been accomplished in spite of the unsus- tainable condition of the Authority’s present financial structure. A 2009 report issued by the MBTA Advisory Board1 effectively summarized the Authority’s financial dilemma: For the past several years the MBTA has only balanced its budgets by restructuring debt liquidat- ing cash reserves, selling land, and other one-time actions. Today, with credit markets frozen, cash reserves depleted and the real estate market at a stand still, the MBTA has used up these options. This recession has laid bare the fact that the MBTA is mired in a structural, on-going deficit that threatens its viability. In 2000 the MBTA was re-born with the passage of the Forward Funding legislation.This legislation dedicated 20% of all sales taxes collected state-wide to the MBTA. It also transferred over $3.3 billion in Commonwealth debt from the State’s books to the T’s books. In essence, the MBTA was born broke. Throughout the 1990’s the Massachusetts sales tax grew at an average of 6.5% per year. This decade the sales tax has barely averaged 1% annual growth.
    [Show full text]
  • North Coast Limited BRASS CAR SIDES
    R O U T E O F T H E Vista-Dome North Coast Limited ek BRASS CAR SIDES Passenger Car Parts for the Streamliners HO North Coast Limited Budd Dining Cars (NP 459-463, CB&Q 458) #173-29 for Con-Cor Conversion, #173-89 for Walthers Conversion Six full dining cars were delivered by Budd in 1957-58 for the Vista-Dome North Coast Limited. They were the last full diners built before the advent of Amtrak. They displaced the Pullman-Standard dining cars NP 450-455 to service on the Mainstreeter. The Budd diners operated between Chicago and Seattle until the end of BN service in 1971. Dining cars were cycled in and out of eastbound No. 26 at St. Paul Union Depot and were serviced at the nearby NP Commissary. Five of the six cars were purchased by Amtrak in 1971 and operated in the North Coast Hiawatha, and later in the "Heritage Fleet", particularly on the trains between Chicago and New York and Washington. A typical summer consist for the North Coast Limited of the late 1950's and 1960's is listed below. [Side sets in brackets available from BRASS CAR SIDES or other manufacturers.] NP 400-411 Water-baggage (Chicago-Seattle) [173-56] NP 425-430 Mail-dorm (Chicago-Seattle) [173-50] NP 325-336 24-8 Budd Slumbercoach (Chicago-Seattle) [Walthers or Con-Cor] SP&S 559 46-Seat Vista-Dome coach (Chicago-Portland) [173-20] NP 588-599 56-Seat leg-rest coach (Chicago-Portland) [173-4] NP 549-556 46-Seat Vista-Dome coach (Chicago-Seattle) [173-20] NP 588-599 56-Seat leg-rest coach (Chicago-Seattle) [173-4] NP 500-517 56-Seat coach (extra cars as needed from
    [Show full text]
  • Massdot News Home > Information Center > Weekly Newsletters > Massdot News 04/21/2017
    Home | About Us | Employment | Contact Us | Site Policies The Official Website of The Massachusetts Department of Transportation MassDOT News Home > Information Center > Weekly Newsletters > MassDOT News 04/21/2017 April 21, 2017 New Bedford: Baker­Polito Administration Celebrate Opening of New CoveWalk Governor Charlie Baker, Transportation Secretary and CEO Stephanie Pollack, New Bedford Mayor Jon Mitchell, elected leaders, and local officials celebrated the official opening of the MassDOT May CoveWalk, New Bedford's newest recreational waterfront path Board Meeting located atop the Hurricane Barrier overlooking Clark’s Cove. May 8, 2017 The 5,500 foot project was awarded $5 million from the Baker­ Transportation Building Polito Administration to help increase access to the historic 10 Park Plaza waterfront and better connect residents and visitors to local Second Floor Board attractions, businesses, and the natural landscape. Room Boston, MA 02150 "Our administration is proud of its partnership with our Commonwealth's municipalities and pleased to make Full Meeting Schedule investments like these that strengthen opportunities in communities like New Bedford," said Governor Baker. "This innovative CoveWalk will provide a range On the MassDOT Blog of new recreational, transit, economic and tourism benefits for visitors, individuals and families Holyoke, South Hadley: throughout the region." "Roll and Stroll" Festival "We are dedicated to working closely with cities and towns throughout the Commonwealth to achieve May 7 our shared transportation and economic goals," said Lieutenant Governor Karyn Polito. "By investing in local projects such as New Bedford's CoveWalk, we can empower our communities and better connect our citizens with opportunities that improve their quality of life.
    [Show full text]
  • MBTA > Riding the T > Events
    The MBTA has announced its service schedules for Christmas Eve (Thursday, December 24, 2015) and Christmas Day (Friday, December 25, 2015) as well as its service schedules for New Year's Eve (Thursday, December 31, 2015) and New Year's Day (Friday, January 1, 2016). Late-Night Service will not be available on Christmas Day or New Year's Day. Parking at the Wellington surface lot and the Alewife, Braintree, Quincy Adams, and Wonderland garages will be pay on entry and cash only on New Year's Eve, December 31, 2015. Credit cards and garage TAP cards will not be accepted. Subway Christmas Eve - Thursday, 12/24/15 • The Red Line will operate a regular weekday schedule. • The Orange Line will operate a regular weekday schedule. • The Blue Line will operate a regular weekday schedule. • The Green Line B-, C-, D-, and E-Branches will operate a regular weekday schedule. • The Silver Line will operate a regular weekday schedule. • The Mattapan Trolley will operate a regular weekday schedule. Christmas Day - Friday, 12/25/15 • The Red Line will operate a Sunday schedule. • The Orange Line will operate a Sunday schedule. • The Blue Line will operate a Sunday schedule. • The Green Line B-, C-, D-, and E-Branches will operate a Sunday schedule. • The Silver Line will operate a Sunday schedule. • The Mattapan Trolley will operate a Sunday schedule. Customers should also note that the CharlieCard Store located adjacent to the Red and Orange Lines at Downtown Crossing Station is closed on Christmas Day. New Year's Eve - Thursday, 12/31/15 • The Red Line will operate a modified weekday schedule with additional trains operating at rush-hour levels of service throughout the evening from 3 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Directors J U L Y 2 4 , 2 0
    BOARD OF DIRECTORS JULY 24, 2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY BOARD ROSTER SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY County Member Alternate Orange: Shawn Nelson (Chair) Jeffrey Lalloway* Supervisor, 4th District Mayor Pro Tem, City of Irvine 2 votes County of Orange, Chairman OCTA Board, Chair OCTA Board Gregory T. Winterbottom Todd Spitzer* Public Member Supervisor, 3rd District OCTA Board County of Orange OCTA Board Riverside: Daryl Busch (Vice-Chair) Andrew Kotyuk* Mayor Council Member 2 votes City of Perris City of San Jacinto RCTC Board, Chair RCTC Board Karen Spiegel Debbie Franklin* Council Member Mayor City of Corona City of Banning RCTC Board RCTC Board Ventura: Keith Millhouse (2nd Vice-Chair) Brian Humphrey Mayor Pro Tem Citizen Representative 1 vote City of Moorpark VCTC Board VCTC Board Los Angeles: Michael Antonovich Roxana Martinez Supervisor, 5th District Councilmember 4 votes County of Los Angeles, Mayor City of Palmdale Metro Board Metro Appointee Hilda Solis Joseph J. Gonzales Supervisor, 1st District Councilmember County of Los Angeles City of South El Monte Metro Board Metro Appointee Paul Krekorian Borja Leon Councilmember, 2nd District Metro Appointee Metro Board Ara Najarian [currently awaiting appointment] Council Member City of Glendale Metro Board One Gateway Plaza, 12th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90012 SCRRA Board of Directors Roster Page 2 San Bernardino: Larry McCallon James Ramos* Mayor Supervisor, 3rd District 2 votes City of Highland County of San Bernardino, Chair SANBAG Board SANBAG Board
    [Show full text]
  • MIT Kendall Square
    Ridership and Service Statistics Thirteenth Edition 2010 Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority MBTA Service and Infrastructure Profile July 2010 MBTA Service District Cities and Towns 175 Size in Square Miles 3,244 Population (2000 Census) 4,663,565 Typical Weekday Ridership (FY 2010) By Line Unlinked Red Line 241,603 Orange Line 184,961 Blue Line 57,273 Total Heavy Rail 483,837 Total Green Line (Light Rail & Trolley) 236,096 Bus (includes Silver Line) 361,676 Silver Line SL1 & SL2* 14,940 Silver Line SL4 & SL5** 15,086 Trackless Trolley 12,364 Total Bus and Trackless Trolley 374,040 TOTAL MBTA-Provided Urban Service 1,093,973 System Unlinked MBTA - Provided Urban Service 1,093,973 Commuter Rail Boardings (Inbound + Outbound) 132,720 Contracted Bus 2,603 Water Transportation 4,372 THE RIDE Paratransit Trips Delivered 6,773 TOTAL ALL MODES UNLINKED 1,240,441 Notes: Unlinked trips are the number of passengers who board public transportation vehicles. Passengers are counted each time they board vehicles no matter how many vehicles they use to travel from their origin to their destination. * Average weekday ridership taken from 2009 CTPS surveys for Silver Line SL1 & SL2. ** SL4 service began in October 2009. Ridership represents a partial year of operation. File: CH 01 p02-7 - MBTA Service and Infrastructure Profile Jul10 1 Annual Ridership (FY 2010) Unlinked Trips by Mode Heavy Rail - Red Line 74,445,042 Total Heavy Rail - Orange Line 54,596,634 Heavy Rail Heavy Rail - Blue Line 17,876,009 146,917,685 Light Rail (includes Mattapan-Ashmont Trolley) 75,916,005 Bus (includes Silver Line) 108,088,300 Total Rubber Tire Trackless Trolley 3,438,160 111,526,460 TOTAL Subway & Bus/Trackless Trolley 334,360,150 Commuter Rail 36,930,089 THE RIDE Paratransit 2,095,932 Ferry (ex.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bulletin R-42S MAKE THEIR FINAL, FINAL RUN Published by the Electric Railroaders’ Association, Inc
    ERA BULLETIN — MARCH, 2020 The Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 63, No. 3 March, 2020 The Bulletin R-42S MAKE THEIR FINAL, FINAL RUN Published by the Electric Railroaders’ Association, Inc. P. O. Box 3323 Grand Central Station New York, NY 10163 For general inquiries, or Bulletin submissions, contact us at bulletin@erausa. org or on our website at erausa. org/contact Editorial Staff: Jeffrey Erlitz Editor-in-Chief Ronald Yee Tri-State News and Commuter Rail Editor Alexander Ivanoff North American and World News Editor David Ross Production Manager Copyright © 2019 ERA This Month’s Cover Photo: Second Avenue Elevated, looking north from 34th The R-42s are seen at Hammels Wye on the last trip northbound from Far Rockaway-Mott Av to Inwood-207 St. Street in about 1937, pho- Marc A. Hermann photograph tographer unknown. MTA New York City Transit retired the last thusiasts joined MTA Chairman and CEO remaining R-42 subway cars from service Patrick J. Foye and NYC Transit President today, ending a 51-year run. The cars have Andy Byford riding the last R-42 in passen- been used on two dozen lines, each traveling ger service. more than seven million miles. They had a “These cars have served the MTA well as a memorable role in an iconic car-vs.-train reliable fleet over the last 50 years,” said Sal- In This Issue: chase in the classic 1971 film French Con- ly Librera, Senior Vice President, Department LIRR Main Line nection. of Subways for New York City Transit. “As Third-Track The final run followed a send-off ceremony technology advances, we’re looking to mod- at the New York Transit Museum, and was ernize our fleet of subway cars to best serve Project Update scheduled to proceed through a final trip on New Yorkers.” …Page 3 the A line from Euclid Av to Far Rockaway (Continued on page 2) to 207 St, before returning to Euclid Av to close its doors for the last time.
    [Show full text]
  • PASSENGER RAIL AUTHORITY Frequently Ask Ed Questions
    BIG SKY PASSENGER RAIL AUTHORITY Frequently Asked Questions What is the goal of the authority? To create a transformational project for Montana — establishing safe, reliable and affordable inter-city, long-distance passenger rail service through southern Montana. Why a passenger rail authority? It’s high time to try a different approach. There is currently no government agency or public institution in Montana that oversees expansion of passenger rail service through the southern tier of the state. A regional passenger rail authority, allowed under Montana state law (MCA 7-14-16), would fill this gap by creating the governance structure to investigate, analyze, seek or accept funding for, and facilitate implementation of, long-distance, inter-city rail service across southern Montana. Why counties? While it is certainly within the power of the Montana state Legislature to establish a regional rail authority (as many other states have done), Montana code grants counties the authority to do this. So, in the absence of legislative leadership, counties can create our own destiny and act now. How much is this going to cost? This can be interpreted in two ways: (1) How much is it going to cost to restore passenger rail service to southern Montana? or (2) How much will it cost to operate a regional rail authority? First, the cost of restoring rail service (be it along the old North Coast Hiawatha or some other alignment) is going to be a function of the specific route(s) chosen, frequency of service, how the system will be operated, and the nature of any public-private partnership that might be forged.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 6-B: Chronology of Amtrak Service in Wisconsin
    Appendix 6-B: Chronology of Amtrak Service in Wisconsin May 1971: As part of its inaugural system, Amtrak operates five daily round trips in the Chicago- Milwaukee corridor over the Milwaukee Road main line. Four of these round trips are trains running exclusively between Chicago’s Union Station and Milwaukee’s Station, with an intermediate stop in Glenview, IL. The fifth round trip is the Chicago-Milwaukee segment of Amtrak’s long-distance train to the West Coast via St. Paul, northern North Dakota (e.g. Minot), northern Montana (e.g. Glacier National Park) and Spokane. Amtrak Route Train Name(s) Train Frequency Intermediate Station Stops Serving Wisconsin (Round Trips) Chicago-Milwaukee Unnamed 4 daily Glenview Chicago-Seattle Empire Builder 1 daily Glenview, Milwaukee, Columbus, Portage, Wisconsin Dells, Tomah, La Crosse, Winona, Red Wing, Minneapolis June 1971: Amtrak maintains five daily round trips in the Chicago-Milwaukee corridor and adds tri- weekly service from Chicago to Seattle via St. Paul, southern North Dakota (e.g. Bismark), southern Montana (e.g. Bozeman and Missoula) and Spokane. Amtrak Route Train Name(s) Train Frequency Intermediate Station Stops Serving Wisconsin (Round Trips) Chicago-Milwaukee Unnamed 4 daily Glenview Chicago-Seattle Empire Builder 1 daily Glenview, Milwaukee, Columbus, Portage, Wisconsin Dells, Tomah, La Crosse, Winona, Red Wing, Minneapolis Chicago-Seattle North Coast Tri-weekly Glenview, Milwaukee, Columbus, Portage, Wisconsin Hiawatha Dells, Tomah, La Crosse, Winona, Red Wing, Minneapolis 6B-1 November 1971: Daily round trip service in the Chicago-Milwaukee corridor is increased from five to seven as Amtrak adds service from Milwaukee to St.
    [Show full text]
  • RECONNECTING MINNESOTA the CASE for an INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL SYSTEM Conrad Defiebre Mick Conlan Transportation Fellow Graduate Research Fellow
    RECONNECTING MINNESOTA THE CASE FOR AN INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL SYSTEM Conrad deFiebre Mick Conlan Transportation Fellow Graduate Research Fellow October 2008 Table of Contents___ Key Findings & Recommendations 2 Introduction 3 The Benefits of Fast Intercity Rail 5 Minnesota Scene 7 Northern Lights Express 7 High-Speed Rail to Chicago 8 Little Crow 10 I-35 Corridor 11 Southeast Express 11 Other Routes 12 Funding Prospects 13 Reference List 14 1 Reconnecting Minnesota Key Findings & Recommendations_____ Key Findings • Modern, high-speed passenger rail service, long a transportation staple in Europe and Asia, is about to blossom in the United States, with important implications for Minnesota. A new federal study documents rail’s benefits of safety, energy conservation, highway congestion relief, environmental protection, economic development, emergency preparedness, mobility for the aging and global competitiveness. • Congress has approved by veto-proof bipartisan majorities $13 billion over five years for passenger rail initiatives. A planned high-speed route from Minneapolis to Duluth could be among the first in line for some of that money. A St. Paul-Chicago connection is also a strong contender. Local and multistate planning and engineering for both are well underway. • Together, these two projects would bring Minnesota more than 15,000 jobs, $648 million in added personal income, nearly $2 billion in enhanced property values and at least $1.2 billion to $2.3 billion in savings from reduced travel times, congestion and pollution. • Minnesota’s costs for these projects – a total of between $700 million and $750 million, according to the latest estimates – would be reduced to no more than $150 million in general obligation bonding with the help of 80 percent federal funding approved by Congress.
    [Show full text]