DOCSLIB.ORG

Water Levels of Lake Ontario

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

WATER LEVELS OF LAKE ONTARIO RNAL REPORT THE INTERNATIONAL JOINT COMMiSSlON - I ( Under the Reference of 25 June 1952 1- 3- BY THE INTERNATIONAL LAKE ONTARIO BOARD OF ENGINEERS WATER LEVELS OF LAKE ONTARIO FINAL REPORT THE INTERNATIONAL JOINT COMMISSION .(-Under the Reference of 25 June 1952 ) THE INTERNATIONAL LAKE ONTARIO BOARD OF ENGINEERS December 1958 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ................................................. 1 Authority ............................................... 1 Instructions to Board of ~ngineers...................... 2 Membership of Board and Working Committee ............... 2 Acknowledgments ......................................... 3 Purpose and Scope ....................................... 4 Datums ................................................. 5 11 DESCRIPTION .................................................. 6 General ................................................. 6 Upper Great Lakes ....................................... 6 Lake Ontario .............................................. 9 St. Lawrence River .................................... .. 12 I11 BASIC DATA ................................................ 19 Co-ordination Between Agencies of Canada and the United States ......................................-a 19 Flater Levels ............................................ 19 Discharges ............................................. 19 Hydrography and Topography .............................. 20 Miscellaneous Data ...................................... 21 IV VARIATIONS IN LAKE ONTARIO >iATER LEVELS ...................... 21 Natural Factors: ........................................ 21 Ranges in Lake Levels ............................... 21 Inflows from the Upper Lakes ........................ 22 Precipitation ........................................ 2Lc Evaporation .......................................... 25 Winds and Barometric Changes ........................ 25 Ice Retardation ..................................... 26 ,.! Crustal Movement ....................... ....., ..... 26 CONTENTS Artificial Factors: ...................................... 28 Diversions .......................................... 28 Changes in the Outlet Control of Lake Ontario ....... 29 Changes in the Outlet Control of Lake Superior ...... 30 Changes in the Outlet Control of Lakes Michigan-Huron 33 Changes in the Outlet Control of Lake Erie .......... 33 INTERM REPORTS .............................................. General ................................................. 34 Report on Effect of Diversions on Lake Ontario hater Levels .................................................. 34 Report on Effect on Lake Ontario hater Levels of an Increase of 1. 000 Cubic Feet Per Second in the Diversion at Chicago for a Period of Three Years .................. 38 Report on Effects on Lake Ontario W~terLevels of the Gut Dam and Channel Changes in the Galop Rapids Reach of the St . Lawrence River ...................................... 40 Report on Regulation of Lake Ontario .................... 42 VI CONCLUSIONS .................................................. 49 (iii) LIST OF TABLES 1. S-ry of Results, Effects on Lake Ontario: Water Levels of Gut Dam and Channel Changes in the Galop Rapids Reach ... 43 LIST. OF PLATES % 1. Great Lakes Drainage Basin and Pertinent Physical Data .............................................. 7 2. Lake Ontario Drainage Basin .................................... 10 3. St. .lawrende River, Lake Ontario to Lake St. Peter ........... U- 4. North Channel and Galop Rapids Section Showing 1874 Conditions and Location of Improvements .................... 15 5. Hydrograph of Recorded Monthly Mean Water Levels of Lake Ontario at Oswego, N.Y. 186GJuly 1955 ..................... 23 6. Daily and Hourly Hydrographs, Lake.Ontario at Cape Vincent, NeY. .e...e.....~n..............~......*.~ee*** 27' WATER LEVELS OF LAKE ONTARIO FINAL REPORT TO THE INTERNATIONAL JOINT COMMISSION UNDER THE REF-CE OF 25 JUNE 1952 SECTION I - INTRODUCTION Authoritg 1. In a Reference dated 25 June 1952, the Governments of Canada and the United States of America requested the International Joint Commission to investigate and report on the following: "In order to determine, having regard to all other interests, whether measures can be taken to regulate the level of Lake Ontario for the benefit of property owners on the shores of the lake in the United States and Canada so as to reduce the extremes of stage which have been experienced, the Governments of the United States and Canada have agreed to refer the matter to the International Joint Commission for investigation and report pursuant to Article IX of the Treaty relating to boundary waters between the United States and Canada, signed January 11, 1909. "It is desired that the Commission study the various factors which affect the fluctuations of water level on Lake Ontario, inclu- ding the construction in the St. Lawrence River known as 'kt Dm', and any diversion of water into or out of the Great Lakes basin, and shall determine whether in its judgment action can be taken by either or both Governments to bring about a more beneficial range of stage, having regard to the proposed plan for improvement for navigation and power of the International Rapids Section of the St. Lawrence River and the proposed method of regulation of the levels of Lake Ontario which is an essential feature of that plan. "As a result of its studies under this Reference, it is desired that the Commission shall determine whether, in its judgment, changes in regard to edsting works or other measures would be practicable and in the public interest from t!le points of view of the two Governments, having in mind the order of precedence to be observed in the uses of boundary waters as provided in Article VIII of the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909. "In the event tha,t the Commission should find that changes in existing works or that other measures would be feasible and desirable, it should indicate how the interests on either side of the boundary would be benefited or adversely affected thereby. The Commission should estimate the cost of such changes in existing works or of such other measures, including indemnification for damage to public and private property arising therefrom and the cost of any remedial works that may be found to be necessary. With due regard to the final para- graph of this Reference and to the arrangements presently being pro- posed for development of power in the International Rapids Section of the St. Lawrence River, the Commission should indicate how the cost of , any measures and the amounts of any resulting damage should be apportioned between the interests involved. "In the conduct of its investigation and otherwise in the per- formance of its duties under this Reference, the Commission may utilize the services of engineers and other specially qualified personnel of the technical agencies of Canada and the United States and will as far as possible make use of information and technical data heretofore acquired by such technical agencies or which may become available during the course of the investigation, thus avoiding duplication of effort and unnecessary expense. "It is the desire of both Governments that consideration of this Reference shall not delay action by the Commission with respect to applications submitted to the Commission concerning the development of power in the Internatio~lalRapids Section of the St. Lawrence River." Instructions to Board of En~ineers 2. Under the authority of this Reference, the lnternetional Joint Commission, in April 1953, established the International Lake Ontario Board of Engineers, the members of which were drawn from technical agencies of the two Govern- ments. In the letter of appointment-from the International Joint Cmmission, the International Lake Ontario Board of Engineers was instructed as follows: "The duties of the Board will be to undertake through appropriate agencies in Canada and the United States, the necessary investigation and studies and to advise the Commission on all technical engineering matters which it must consider in making a report or reports to the two Governments under the Reference of 25 June 1952." Membership nf Board and 1r;orkinp Committee 3. The International Lake Ontario Board of Engineers is composed of one representative from each Government. 14r. Gail A. Hathaway, formerly Special Assistant to the Chief of Sngineers, Department of the Army, Washington, D.C., now Engineering Consultant to the International Bank for Reconstruction and Developent, is the United States member. Hr. T.M. Patterson, Director, Water Resources Branch, Department of Northern Affairs and National Resources, Ottawa, Ontario, is the Canadian member. 4. The Board arranged for technical assistance through the appointment of its International Lake Ontario Working Committee with two members each from the United States and Canada. Membership of the United States Section con- sists of Mr. F.F. Snyder, Hydraulic Engineer, Office of the Chief of Engineers, Department of the Army, Nashington, D.C., Chairman, and IYir. Edwin W. Nelson, Chief Engineering Consultant, Office of the Division Engineer, North Central Division, Corps of Engineers, Chicago, Illinois. Mr. Snyder was appointed Chairman on 15 July 1957 to replace Brigadier General P.D. Berrigan upon his resignation as member and Chairman of the United States Section, and on the same date Ivir. Nelson was appointed a member. General Berrigan became a member and Chairman of
Recommended publications
  • Lake Ontario a Voice!

    Lake Ontario a Voice!

    Statue Stories Chicago: The Public Writing Competition Give Lake Ontario a voice! Behind the Art Institute of Chicago, is the Fountain of the Great Lakes. Within the famous fountain is the wistful figure of Lake Ontario. She sits apart from her sister lakes, gazing into the distance with arms outstretched. But what does she have to say for herself? Write a Monologue! Monologos means “speaking alone” in Greek, but we all know that people who speak without thinking about their listener can be very dull indeed. Your challenge is to find a ‘voice’ for your statue and to write an engaging monologue in 350 words. Get under your statue’s skin! Look closely and develop a sense of empathy with the sculpture and imagine how it would feel. How does Lake Ontario feel about her sister lakes? Invite your listener to feel with you: create shifts in tempo and emotion, use different tenses, figures of speech and anecdotes, sensory details and even sound effects. Finding your sculpture’s voice? Write in the first person and adopt the persona of your character: What kind of vocabulary will you use - your own or that of another era/dialect? Your words will be spoken so read them aloud: use their rhythm and your sentence structure to convey emotion and urgency. Read great monologues for inspiration, for example Hamlet’s Alas Poor Yorick, or watch film monologues, like Morgan Freeman’s in The Shawshank Redemption. How will you keep people listening? Structure your monologue! How will you introduce yourself? With a greeting, a warning, a question, an order, a riddle? Grab and hold your listener’s attention from your very first line.
  • AN OVERVIEW of the GEOLOGY of the GREAT LAKES BASIN by Theodore J

    AN OVERVIEW of the GEOLOGY of the GREAT LAKES BASIN by Theodore J

    AN OVERVIEW OF THE GEOLOGY OF THE GREAT LAKES BASIN by Theodore J. Bornhorst 2016 This document may be cited as: Bornhorst, T. J., 2016, An overview of the geology of the Great Lakes basin: A. E. Seaman Mineral Museum, Web Publication 1, 8p. This is version 1 of A. E. Seaman Mineral Museum Web Publication 1 which was only internally reviewed for technical accuracy. The Great Lakes Basin The Great Lakes basin, as defined by watersheds that drain into the Great Lakes (Figure 1), includes about 85 % of North America’s and 20 % of the world’s surface fresh water, a total of about 5,500 cubic miles (23,000 cubic km) of water (1). The basin covers about 94,000 square miles (240,000 square km) including about 10 % of the U.S. population and 30 % of the Canadian population (1). Lake Michigan is the only Great Lake entirely within the United States. The State of Michigan lies at the heart of the Great Lakes basin. Together the Great Lakes are the single largest surface fresh water body on Earth and have an important physical and cultural role in North America. Figure 1: The Great Lakes states and Canadian Provinces and the Great Lakes watershed (brown) (after 1). 1 Precambrian Bedrock Geology The bedrock geology of the Great Lakes basin can be subdivided into rocks of Precambrian and Phanerozoic (Figure 2). The Precambrian of the Great Lakes basin is the result of three major episodes with each followed by a long period of erosion (2, 3). Figure 2: Generalized Precambrian bedrock geologic map of the Great Lakes basin.
  • Humber River Watershed Plan Pathways to a Healthy Humber June 2008

    Humber River Watershed Plan Pathways to a Healthy Humber June 2008

    HUMBER RIVER WATERSHED PLAN PAThwAYS TO A HEALTHY HUMBER JUNE 2008 Prepared by: Toronto and Region Conservation © Toronto and Region Conservation 2008 ISBN: 978-0-9811107-1-4 www.trca.on.ca 5 Shoreham Drive, Toronto, Ontario M3N 1S4 phone: 416-661-6600 fax: 416-661-6898 HUMBER RIVER WATERSHED PLAN PATHWAYS TO A HEALTHY HUMBER JUNE 2008 Prepared by: Toronto and Region Conservation i Humber River Watershed Plan, 2008 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Humber River Watershed Plan—Pathways to a Healthy Humber—was written by Suzanne Barrett, edited by Dean Young and represents the combined effort of many participants. Appreciation and thanks are extended to Toronto and Region Conservation staff and consultants (listed in Appendix F) for their technical support and input, to government partners for their financial support and input, and to Humber Watershed Alliance members for their advice and input. INCORPORATED 1850 Humber River Watershed Plan, 2008 ii HUMBER RIVER WATERSHED PLAN PATHWAYS TO A HEALTHY HUMBER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Humber River watershed is an extraordinary resource. It spans 903 square kilometres, from the headwaters on the Niagara Escarpment and Oak Ridges Moraine down through fertile clay plains to the marshes and river mouth on Lake Ontario. The watershed provides many benefits to the people who live in it. It is a source of drinking water drawn from wells or from Lake Ontario. Unpaved land absorbs water from rain and snowfall to replenish groundwater and streams and reduce the negative impacts of flooding and erosion. Healthy aquatic and terrestrial habitats support diverse communities of plants and animals. Agricultural lands provide local sources of food and green spaces provide recreation opportunities.
  • CP's North American Rail

    CP's North American Rail

    2020_CP_NetworkMap_Large_Front_1.6_Final_LowRes.pdf 1 6/5/2020 8:24:47 AM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Lake CP Railway Mileage Between Cities Rail Industry Index Legend Athabasca AGR Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway ETR Essex Terminal Railway MNRR Minnesota Commercial Railway TCWR Twin Cities & Western Railroad CP Average scale y y y a AMTK Amtrak EXO EXO MRL Montana Rail Link Inc TPLC Toronto Port Lands Company t t y i i er e C on C r v APD Albany Port Railroad FEC Florida East Coast Railway NBR Northern & Bergen Railroad TPW Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway t oon y o ork éal t y t r 0 100 200 300 km r er Y a n t APM Montreal Port Authority FLR Fife Lake Railway NBSR New Brunswick Southern Railway TRR Torch River Rail CP trackage, haulage and commercial rights oit ago r k tland c ding on xico w r r r uébec innipeg Fort Nelson é APNC Appanoose County Community Railroad FMR Forty Mile Railroad NCR Nipissing Central Railway UP Union Pacic e ansas hi alga ancou egina as o dmon hunder B o o Q Det E F K M Minneapolis Mon Mont N Alba Buffalo C C P R Saint John S T T V W APR Alberta Prairie Railway Excursions GEXR Goderich-Exeter Railway NECR New England Central Railroad VAEX Vale Railway CP principal shortline connections Albany 689 2622 1092 792 2636 2702 1574 3518 1517 2965 234 147 3528 412 2150 691 2272 1373 552 3253 1792 BCR The British Columbia Railway Company GFR Grand Forks Railway NJT New Jersey Transit Rail Operations VIA Via Rail A BCRY Barrie-Collingwood Railway GJR Guelph Junction Railway NLR Northern Light Rail VTR
  • Lake Ontario Shoreline Hazards Report (Shoreplan, 2005)

    Lake Ontario Shoreline Hazards Report (Shoreplan, 2005)

    Addendum to CVC’s Lake Ontario Shoreline Hazards Report (Shoreplan, 2005) Issue Date: December 24, 2020 The LOSH study includes both hazard delineation, with mapping, and a suggested approach for applying the hazard limits to typical development applications. Since the Lake Ontario Shoreline Hazard (LOSH) study report was prepared, there have been several changes in Federal and Provincial policies along with technical advancements. A peer review was initiated to understand which components of the study, if any, are outdated and therefore, require revision. This addendum provides guidance on shoreline hazard delineation and the application of hazard limits to new development applications based on the recommendations of the Review of CVC’s Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Hazards Report (Shoreplan, 2005), and other resources. This document should be read in combination with CVC’s Lake Ontario Shoreline Hazard (LOSH) Study. The 2020 update to the Provincial Policy Statement added item 3.1.3 which states “Planning authorities shall prepare for the impacts of a changing climate that may increase the risk associated with natural hazards”. Impacts of a changing climate are defined as the present and future consequences from changes in weather patterns at local and regional levels, including extreme weather events and increased climate variability. A considerable amount of research has been done on climate change and its expected effects on the Great Lakes, but while results vary considerably, there is general consensus on several key points. Overall, water levels are expected to fall while severe storm frequency and intensity are both expected to increase. The aspect of climate change most relevant to the LOSH relates to changing water levels, unfortunately there is little confidence in the existing calculations of future water levels in adequately projecting impacts to a changing climate.
  • Nipigon Bay Area of Concern Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010

    Nipigon Bay Area of Concern Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010

    Nipigon Bay Area of Concern Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010 Nipigon Bay is in the most northerly area of Lake Superior. The Area of Concern takes in a large portion of Nipigon Bay and the Nipigon River, the largest tributary to Lake Superior, and the communities of Red Rock and Nipigon. There are Ontario Power Generation dams on the Nipigon River for the generation of hydroelectricity. The area supports a variety of wetlands and bird populations, including one of four known pelican colonies in Ontario. The watershed forests on both sides of the Nipigon River have been allocated for forest harvesting. Environmental concerns in the Nipigon Bay Area of Concern are related to water level and flow fluctuations in Lake Nipigon and the Nipigon River from the generation of hydroelectricity. These fluctuations affect stream bank stability, sediment load and fish and wildlife habitat. Other concerns include the accumulation of wood fibre, bark and other organic material from past log drives, and effluent discharges from a linerboard mill (which closed in 2006) and the municipal sewage treatment plants in Nipigon and Red Rock. PARTNERSHIPS IN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Nipigon Bay was designated an Area of Concern in 1987 under the Canada–United States Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. Areas of Concern are sites on the Great Lakes system where environmental quality is significantly degraded and beneficial uses are impaired. Currently, there are 9 such designated areas on the Canadian side of the Great Lakes, 25 in the United States, and 5 that are shared by both countries. In each Area of Concern, government, community and industry partners are undertaking a coordinated effort to restore environmental quality and beneficial uses through a remedial action plan.
  • Lake Superior Food Web MENT of C

    Lake Superior Food Web MENT of C

    ATMOSPH ND ER A I C C I A N D A M E I C N O I S L T A R N A T O I I O T N A N U E .S C .D R E E PA M RT OM Lake Superior Food Web MENT OF C Sea Lamprey Walleye Burbot Lake Trout Chinook Salmon Brook Trout Rainbow Trout Lake Whitefish Bloater Yellow Perch Lake herring Rainbow Smelt Deepwater Sculpin Kiyi Ruffe Lake Sturgeon Mayfly nymphs Opossum Shrimp Raptorial waterflea Mollusks Amphipods Invasive waterflea Chironomids Zebra/Quagga mussels Native waterflea Calanoids Cyclopoids Diatoms Green algae Blue-green algae Flagellates Rotifers Foodweb based on “Impact of exotic invertebrate invaders on food web structure and function in the Great Lakes: NOAA, Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, 4840 S. State Road, Ann Arbor, MI A network analysis approach” by Mason, Krause, and Ulanowicz, 2002 - Modifications for Lake Superior, 2009. 734-741-2235 - www.glerl.noaa.gov Lake Superior Food Web Sea Lamprey Macroinvertebrates Sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus). An aggressive, non-native parasite that Chironomids/Oligochaetes. Larval insects and worms that live on the lake fastens onto its prey and rasps out a hole with its rough tongue. bottom. Feed on detritus. Species present are a good indicator of water quality. Piscivores (Fish Eaters) Amphipods (Diporeia). The most common species of amphipod found in fish diets that began declining in the late 1990’s. Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Pacific salmon species stocked as a trophy fish and to control alewife. Opossum shrimp (Mysis relicta). An omnivore that feeds on algae and small cladocerans.
  • 2018 Roadmap to Fishing Lake Superior: Have a Super Time!

    2018 Roadmap to Fishing Lake Superior: Have a Super Time!

    Roadmap to Fishing Lake Superior: Have a Super Time! Want to fish Lake Superior, but aren’t sure when or where to go? This roadmap is a starting point to provide you with information on many fishing sites and times of the year when great opportunities exist. Please note this is not an exhaustive list. Eagle HarborCopper Harbor Traverse Bay Ontonagon Keweenaw Bay Black River Harbor Grand Marais Marquette Au Train-Shelter Bay St. Marys River Munising Black River Au Train- Ontonagon Eagle Harbor Copper Harbor Traverse Bay Keweenaw Bay Marquette Munising Grand Marais St. Marys River Port Harbor Shelter Bay brown trout, Chinook, cisco, coho, brown trout, Chinook, cisco, brown trout, Chinook, cisco, coho, brown trout, lake trout, lake whitefish, round coho, lake trout, lake whitefish, lake trout, lake whitefish, round coho, lake whitefish, n burbot, coho, cisco, walleye, yellow perch Feb - March whitefish, siscowet, smelt, splake, round whitefish, siscowet, smelt, whitefish, splake, steelhead, pike, yellow perch smelt, steelhead steelhead, yellow perch splake, steelhead, yellow perch yellow perch brown trout, Chinook, coho, lake brown trout, Chinook, coho, brown trout, Chinook, cisco, Chinook, cisco, coho, lake brown trout, Chinook, brown trout, Chinook, cisco, coho, Chinook, trout, lake whitefish, Chinook, coho, lake trout, coho, lake trout, round trout, lake whitefish, n pike, coho, lake trout, lake siscowet lake trout, lake whitefish, siscowet, coho, lake round whitefish, April - May lake trout, siscowet, whitefish, siscowet, smelt, sm bass,
  • Physical Characteristics of the Humber River

    Physical Characteristics of the Humber River

    PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE HUMBER RIVER TECHNICAL REPORT #3 A REPORT OF THE TORONTO AREA WATERSHED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY STEERING COMMITTEE MARCH, 1984 Copyright Provisions and Restrictions on Copying: This Ontario Ministry of the Environment work is protected by Crown copyright (unless otherwise indicated), which is held by the Queen's Printer for Ontario. It may be reproduced for non-commercial purposes if credit is given and Crown copyright is acknowledged. It may not be reproduced, in all or in part, for any commercial purpose except under a licence from the Queen's Printer for Ontario. For information on reproducing Government of Ontario works, please contact ServiceOntario Publications at [email protected] TORONTO AREA WATERSHED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBER AGENCIES Ontario Ministry of the Environment Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto Borough of East York City of Etobicoke City of North York City of Scarborough City of Toronto City of York Regional Municipality of Peel Regional Municipality of York Environment Canada PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE HUMBER RIVER TECHNICAL REPORT # 3 A REPORT OF THE TORONTO AREA WATERSHED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY STEERING COMMITTEE Prepared by: S.R. Klose, B.A. Sc. Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and A. Bacchus, Technologist Water Resources Branch Ontario Ministry of the Environment March, 1984 Table of Contents Abstract iii Acknowledgements iv 1. Introduction 1 2. Description of River Basin 2 3. Methods 5 4. Results 4.1 River Profile and Channel Geometry 11 4.2 Sediment Deposition Mapping 15 4.2.1 Sediment Deposition in Reach 1 15 4.2.2 Sediment Deposition in Reaches 2 and 3 18 4.3 Time of Travel 24 5.
  • Line 5 Straits of Mackinac Summary When Michigan Was Granted

    Line 5 Straits of Mackinac Summary When Michigan Was Granted

    Line 5 Straits of Mackinac Summary When Michigan was granted statehood on January 26, 1837, Michigan also acquired ownership of the Great Lakes' bottomlands under the equal footing doctrine.1 However before Michigan could become a state, the United States first had to acquire title from us (Ottawa and Chippewa bands) because Anglo-American law acknowledged that we owned legal title as the aboriginal occupants of the territory we occupied. But when we agreed to cede legal title to the United States in the March 28, 1836 Treaty of Washington ("1836 Treaty", 7 Stat. 491), we reserved fishing, hunting and gathering rights. Therefore, Michigan's ownership of both the lands and Great Lakes waters within the cession area of the 1836 Treaty was burdened with preexisting trust obligations with respect to our treaty-reserved resources. First, the public trust doctrine imposes a duty (trust responsibility) upon Michigan to protect the public trust in the resources dependent upon the quality of the Great Lakes water.2 In addition, Art. IV, § 52 of Michigan's Constitution says "conservation…of the natural resources of the state are hereby declared to be of paramount public concern…" and then mandates the legislature to "provide for the protection of the air, water and other natural resources from 3 pollution, impairment and destruction." 1 The State of Michigan acquired title to these bottomlands in its sovereign capacity upon admission to the Union and holds them in trust for the benefit of the people of Michigan. Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Illinois, 146 U.S. 387, 434-35 (1892); Nedtweg v.
  • Quarterly Climate Impacts and Outlook for the Great Lakes Region

    Quarterly Climate Impacts and Outlook for the Great Lakes Region

    Quarterly Climate Impacts Great Lakes Region and Outlook December 2018 Great Lakes Significant Events –for September - November 2018 Extreme shifts from unseasonably warm to record cold temperatures occurred this fall season. For Cleveland, OH and Erie, PA, it was the second warmest September on record at 22°C and 21°C (70.7°F and 69.7°F), respectively. Many record warm temperatures occurred in the eastern lakes on October 8 and 9, when Erie tied its warmest October temperature on record at 32°C (89°F). Following extreme warmth early in the season, cold weather abruptly set in for November throughout the basin. The warmest temperature reached in Chicago during all of November was 11°C (52°F), the coldest mark since records began in 1871. Six counties in the central area of the upper peninsula of Michigan recorded their wettest October on record while Sault Ste. Marie, MI had its second wettest October with 19 cm (7 in) of precipitation. Toronto recorded its cloudiest November on record with an average cloud cover of 88% during daylight hours while 10 days during the month were cloudy 100% of the time. In addition, as of December 4, Chicago was having its second wettest year-to-date on record. Regional Climate Overview – for September - November 2018 Fall 2018 Temperature Precipitation and Temperature Departure from Normal September temperatures were up to 4°C (7°F) above normal, with the southern Erie basin being the warmest. October temperatures ranged from 3°C (5°F) below normal in the Superior basin to 3°C Great Lakes Water Levels (5°F) above normal in the southern Erie basin.
  • THE SHARED PATH Foxwell St Terry Dr Symes Rd

    THE SHARED PATH Foxwell St Terry Dr Symes Rd

    GETTING THERE AND BACK Follow the path of an ancient You can reach the suggested start and end point Aboriginal portage route. Discover 7 MARSHES AND OAK SAVANNAH on public transit by taking the BLOOR / DANFORTH panoramic views, river marshes, and The marsh at the mouth of the Humber River, dating subway to Old Mill station. Other TTC access is back 5,000 years, housed a wide range of plants, provided by a Dundas Street West Bus Route and the former sits of water-powered mills sh, waterfowl, and mammals which made it a vital The Queensway Streetcar. hunting, shing, and gathering site for Aboriginal THE ROUTES peoples. Further up the path, a black savannah tree is a rare remnant of an ecosystem that once ourished FOR MORE INFO SHARED PATH DISCOVERY WALK in the dry, sandy soils at the bottom of former Lake Discovery Walks is a program of self-guided walks Although you can begin this Discovery Walk Iroquois (now known as Lake Ontario). that links city ravines, parks, gardens, beaches and at any point along the route, a good starting neighbourhoods. For more information on Discovery point is at the base of the footbridge over the Walks, including brochures, please call customer Humber River where it enters Lake Ontario. You’ll visit The Shared 9 THE KING’S MILL service at 311, or 416-392-CITY (2489) from outside the beginning of an ancient portage route up the City limits. Information can also be found at toronto. Humber River Valley, sites of early fur trading posts, In 1793, the King’s Mills, the area’s rst water-powered ca/parks/trails/discover.htm.