DOCSLIB.ORG

MD of Bighorn IDP Rocky View County IREF 2020-03

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MD of Bighorn IDP Rocky View County IREF 2020-03 ST575 r Acme e Mountain v Carbon i R r View County 579 e ST e Bircham D d e 2")A 806 Kneehill ST836 le R ST Litt Madden County Bottrel ST574 Crossfield Nier Lakes Rocky View County - M.D. of Bighorn ")72 Beiseker Intermunicipal Development Plan ST766 Stoney ST772 Nakoda Irricana Nation Waipa r Rocky View County ")9 o u s ST567 Cr e e Gho k st R i Benchlands ver Airdrie Wheatland County Cochrane Lake ")21 M.D. of Cochrane Lake Rockyford Bighorn B Kathyrn Keoma 1")A ow R Balzac iv No. 8 er Cochrane ST566 Ghost Lake McDonald Lake Nightingale Stoney Nakoda Nation Delacour 564 J NW ST u IL RA E m T Y N p E L I i N Dalroy n O A g T R S T po u T Lyalta C O n R d O O C W C F r H R e I E Conrich e L k D T E R D 1 A IL ³² N W Strathmore ST563 Chestermere ST791 ")68 Elb Calgary ow Chestermere R Lake ive ")8 r Cheadle ST797 G LEN MOR Janet E TRAIL SW Wheatland County Eagle Lake Glenmore Reservoir ST560 (portion within CMRB) Tsuut'ina Langdon Bragg Creek Nation Namaka d x 758 Namaka ST Lake m . l ST817 a 201 ³ ± Indus M n A Dalemead Lake o Priddis C i Stobart L ST22X Lake g Greens E O e D ST901 R Priddis T R 3 A Dalemead 0 I L 0 Lloyd Lake 66 S 2 ") E 0 Carseland Siksika 2 \ Nation F E Heritage R ST762 I Pointe \ D De Winton X M \ s ")24 p a Foothills County ST552 M \ Blizzard Lake S in C Millarville I po t r e e Okotoks e r ek G h T B ST549 R Arrowwood M ")2 Mossleigh C \ r Sheep Rive D ST547 R A ")7 O Black Diamond B N Aldersyde Turner ST799 O I Valley G ST546 E ST783 R N Herronton A T I L Blackie O High River 543 P ST O Kananaskis I.D. R T ST542 E ")23 Frank Lake M iver ood R Highw Y R A G Longview Vulcan County L Brant A C - e v i r 540 Stoney Nakoda ST Bow Rive Ensign Li le r D tt 541 e ST Nation n (Eden Valley) ST804 O \ Cayley r 40 i ") a 22 l ") c Stoney Nakoda e Nation L l (Eden Valley) u a P - 534 Vulcan n ST a e J \ s r e s M.D. of U \ : Willow Nanton Kirkcaldy C | Creek No. 26 9 0 - 1 0 ST533 - 0 2 M.D. of 0 2 ST532 | Ranchland Parkland P J No. 66 Rocky View County - M.D. of Bighorn IDP CMRB Municipality Rocky View County - M.D. of Bighorn IDP Rocky View County km ° 0 5 10 20 IREF 2020-03 Data Sources: AltaLIS, ESRI Map Created: 2020-01-09 Regional Context Map are for reference purposes only. The CMRB provides no warranty, nor accepts any liability arising from any incorrect, incomplete, or misleading information. Interim Regional Evaluation Framework Mountain ST579 View County Bottrel ST574 Rocky View County - M.D. of Bighorn Intermunicipal Development Plan )"22 Rocky View County Benchlands ST766 )"40 M.D. of ST567 Bighorn No. 8 Cochrane Lake d x m Cochrane Lake . l a c o L 3 0 0 Town of Cochrane 2 0 1)"A 2 \ F E R I \ D X M \ s p Ghost Lake a M \ S I G B R M C \ D R A O B N O I G E R N A T I L O P O R T E 1 M Y ³² R A G L A C - e v i r D e n O \ r i a l c e L l u a P - )"68 n a e J \ Kananaskis I.D. s r e s U \ : C )"8 | 4 1 - 1 0 - 0 2 0 2 | P J Rocky View County - M.D. of Bighorn IDP CMRB Municipality Rocky View County - M.D. of Bighorn IDP Rocky View County km ° 0 1.25 2.5 5 IREF 2020-03 Data Sources: AltaLIS, ESRI Map Created: 2020-01-14 Local Context Map are for reference purposes only. The CMRB provides no warranty, nor accepts any liability arising from any incorrect, incomplete, or misleading information. Interim Regional Evaluation Framework.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Glenbow Archives Canadian Pacific Railway. Right-Of-Way Department
    Glenbow Archives Canadian Pacific Railway. Right-of-Way Department fonds (M-9591) Return to inventory: http://www.glenbow.org/collections/search/findingAids/archhtm/cpr_right.cfm Series 69 Station ground plans and title records plans. 1891-1979. Roll-1 Manitoba-CPR Station Grounds Plans: M-9591-OS-01. Deloraine, Manitoba. Dated ca. 1965. M-9591-OS-02. Gimli, Manitoba. Dated May 1968 revised Nov 1969. M-9591-OS-03. Hartney, Manitoba. Dated Feb 1937 revised May 1967. M-9591-OS-04. Minnedosa, Manitoba. Dated Apr 1923 revised Nov 1950. M-9591-OS-05. North Transcona Railway Yard. (in 3 parts). Dated May 1944 revised Dec 1972. M-9591-OS-06. Oak Lake, Manitoba. Dated Mar 1934 revised Jan 1965. M-9591-OS-07. Paddington Station grounds c/w GWWD Rly. Not dated, ca.1944. Missing title block. Part of St Boniface Plan. M-9591-OS-08. Selkirk, Manitoba. (shows location of second Selkirk station) Dated March 1953, revised November 1969. M-9591-OS-09. Selkirk, Manitoba-Industrial River Spur. Dated January 1949, revised September 1949. M-9591-OS-10. St Boniface Yard (showing Whitter Junction). Dated June 1944, revised Mar 1973. M-9591-OS-11. Virden, Manitoba. Dated Mar 1928 revised July 1963. M-9591-OS-12. Waskada, Manitoba. Dated Apr 1913 revised Nov 1960. M-9591-OS-13. Weston Shops - Part of Main Winnipeg Terminals. Not Dated, ca.1965. Sheet 1. M-9591-OS-14. Winnipeg Yard Plan-Winnipeg Station area. Not Dated ca.1965. Sheet 3. M-9591-OS-15. Winnipeg-City lots north of old Exhibition Grounds-Dated November 1965.
    [Show full text]
  • St2 St9 St1 St3 St2
    ! SUPP2-Attachment 07 Page 1 of 8 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! .! ! ! ! ! ! SM O K Y L A K E C O U N T Y O F ! Redwater ! Busby Legal 9L960/9L961 57 ! 57! LAMONT 57 Elk Point 57 ! COUNTY ST . P A U L Proposed! Heathfield ! ! Lindbergh ! Lafond .! 56 STURGEON! ! COUNTY N O . 1 9 .! ! .! Alcomdale ! ! Andrew ! Riverview ! Converter Station ! . ! COUNTY ! .! . ! Whitford Mearns 942L/943L ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 56 ! 56 Bon Accord ! Sandy .! Willingdon ! 29 ! ! ! ! .! Wostok ST Beach ! 56 ! ! ! ! .!Star St. Michael ! ! Morinville ! ! ! Gibbons ! ! ! ! ! Brosseau ! ! ! Bruderheim ! . Sunrise ! ! .! .! ! ! Heinsburg ! ! Duvernay ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! 18 3 Beach .! Riviere Qui .! ! ! 4 2 Cardiff ! 7 6 5 55 L ! .! 55 9 8 ! ! 11 Barre 7 ! 12 55 .! 27 25 2423 22 ! 15 14 13 9 ! 21 55 19 17 16 ! Tulliby¯ Lake ! ! ! .! .! 9 ! ! ! Hairy Hill ! Carbondale !! Pine Sands / !! ! 44 ! ! L ! ! ! 2 Lamont Krakow ! Two Hills ST ! ! Namao 4 ! .Fort! ! ! .! 9 ! ! .! 37 ! ! . ! Josephburg ! Calahoo ST ! Musidora ! ! .! 54 ! ! ! 2 ! ST Saskatchewan! Chipman Morecambe Myrnam ! 54 54 Villeneuve ! 54 .! .! ! .! 45 ! .! ! ! ! ! ! ST ! ! I.D. Beauvallon Derwent ! ! ! ! ! ! ! STRATHCONA ! ! !! .! C O U N T Y O F ! 15 Hilliard ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! N O . 1 3 St. Albert! ! ST !! Spruce ! ! ! ! ! !! !! COUNTY ! TW O HI L L S 53 ! 45 Dewberry ! ! Mundare ST ! (ELK ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! . ! ! Clandonald ! ! N O . 2 1 53 ! Grove !53! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ISLAND) ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ardrossan
    [Show full text]
  • Bow River Basin State of the Watershed Summary 2010 Bow River Basin Council Calgary Water Centre Mail Code #333 P.O
    30% SW-COC-002397 Bow River Basin State of the Watershed Summary 2010 Bow River Basin Council Calgary Water Centre Mail Code #333 P.O. Box 2100 Station M Calgary, AB Canada T2P 2M5 Street Address: 625 - 25th Ave S.E. Bow River Basin Council Mark Bennett, B.Sc., MPA Executive Director tel: 403.268.4596 fax: 403.254.6931 email: [email protected] Mike Murray, B.Sc. Program Manager tel: 403.268.4597 fax: 403.268.6931 email: [email protected] www.brbc.ab.ca Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 2 Overview 4 Basin History 6 What is a Watershed? 7 Flora and Fauna 10 State of the Watershed OUR SUB-BASINS 12 Upper Bow River 14 Kananaskis River 16 Ghost River 18 Seebe to Bearspaw 20 Jumpingpound Creek 22 Bearspaw to WID 24 Elbow River 26 Nose Creek 28 WID to Highwood 30 Fish Creek 32 Highwood to Carseland 34 Highwood River 36 Sheep River 38 Carseland to Bassano 40 Bassano to Oldman River CONCLUSION 42 Summary 44 Acknowledgements 1 Overview WELCOME! This State of the Watershed: Summary Booklet OVERVIEW OF THE BOW RIVER BASIN LET’S TAKE A CLOSER LOOK... THE WATER TOWERS was created by the Bow River Basin Council as a companion to The mountainous headwaters of the Bow our new Web-based State of the Watershed (WSOW) tool. This Comprising about 25,000 square kilometres, the Bow River basin The Bow River is approximately 645 kilometres in length. It begins at Bow Lake, at an River basin are often described as the booklet and the WSOW tool is intended to help water managers covers more than 4% of Alberta, and about 23% of the South elevation of 1,920 metres above sea level, then drops 1,180 metres before joining with the water towers of the watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain View County
    June 2014 (Updated) Mountain View County C-65.1 Mountain View County Community Overview À à À 592 42 à Penhold 22 761 MarkervilleÀ 781 Spruce à À à Caroline View à 2 591 54 2A Dickson Innisfail À 590À 590 Burns ick À 791 Lake À 22 à 587 Bowden À À 587 766 WimborneÀ 2A à 805 584À B = 210 à à Torrington A = 144 27 Sundre 27 Olds 2 à 760À 583À C = 157 À À À 22 à 582 582 Didsbury 582 791À 2A à À D = 25 CarstairsÀ 581 E = 113 Cremona À 580 580 575À 579À À 734 À 766 À MaddenÀ 574 Bottrel 574 Crossfield à à 72 22 À 772 2 à Irricana À À 567À 567 567 Airdrie à à Waiparous À 40 9 Benchlands 567 À À 791 772 Kathyrn Keoma Cochrane Where subcommunities exist, letters (A, B, C, etc.) identify subcommunities; Legend numbers show the number of EDIs analyzed for each subcommunity. # of analyzed EDI 0 - 66 67 - 121 Please note: Percentages tend to be more representative when 122 - 203 ! they are based on larger numbers. 204 - 350 351 - 900 ECMap June 2014 (Updated) Mountain View County C-65.2 Additional Community Information EDI Summary: Number of EDIs available: 731 Number of EDIs used in analysis:649 % of special needs: 1.6% Age at EDI completion and gender Age Groups ≤ 5yrs 2mos 5yrs 3mos - 5yrs 6mos 5yrs 7mos - 5yrs 10mos > 5yrs 11mos Total Gender N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) F 26 (4.0%) 78 (12.0%) 123 (19.0%) 88 (13.6%) 315 (48.5%) M 26 (4.0%) 89 (13.7%) 121 (18.6%) 98 (15.1%) 334 (51.5%) FM 52 (8.0%) 167 (25.7%) 244 (37.6%) 186 (28.7%) 649 (100%) * Please note: The total number of boys and girls in each category may not add up to an exact total because gender may not have been identifed in all questionnaires.
    [Show full text]
  • Published Local Histories
    ALBERTA HISTORIES Published Local Histories assembled by the Friends of Geographical Names Society as part of a Local History Mapping Project (in 1995) May 1999 ALBERTA LOCAL HISTORIES Alphabetical Listing of Local Histories by Book Title 100 Years Between the Rivers: A History of Glenwood, includes: Acme, Ardlebank, Bancroft, Berkeley, Hartley & Standoff — May Archibald, Helen Bircham, Davis, Delft, Gobert, Greenacres, Kia Ora, Leavitt, and Brenda Ferris, e , published by: Lilydale, Lorne, Selkirk, Simcoe, Sterlingville, Glenwood Historical Society [1984] FGN#587, Acres and Empires: A History of the Municipal District of CPL-F, PAA-T Rocky View No. 44 — Tracey Read , published by: includes: Glenwood, Hartley, Hillspring, Lone Municipal District of Rocky View No. 44 [1989] Rock, Mountain View, Wood, FGN#394, CPL-T, PAA-T 49ers [The], Stories of the Early Settlers — Margaret V. includes: Airdrie, Balzac, Beiseker, Bottrell, Bragg Green , published by: Thomasville Community Club Creek, Chestermere Lake, Cochrane, Conrich, [1967] FGN#225, CPL-F, PAA-T Crossfield, Dalemead, Dalroy, Delacour, Glenbow, includes: Kinella, Kinnaird, Thomasville, Indus, Irricana, Kathyrn, Keoma, Langdon, Madden, 50 Golden Years— Bonnyville, Alta — Bonnyville Mitford, Sampsontown, Shepard, Tribune , published by: Bonnyville Tribune [1957] Across the Smoky — Winnie Moore & Fran Moore, ed. , FGN#102, CPL-F, PAA-T published by: Debolt & District Pioneer Museum includes: Bonnyville, Moose Lake, Onion Lake, Society [1978] FGN#10, CPL-T, PAA-T 60 Years: Hilda’s Heritage,
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Municipal Codes
    2017 Municipal Codes Updated December 22, 2017 Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: 780-427-2225 Fax: 780-420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] 2017 MUNICIPAL CHANGES STATUS CHANGES: 0315 - The Village of Thorsby became the Town of Thorsby (effective January 1, 2017). NAME CHANGES: 0315- The Town of Thorsby (effective January 1, 2017) from Village of Thorsby. AMALGAMATED: FORMATIONS: DISSOLVED: 0038 –The Village of Botha dissolved and became part of the County of Stettler (effective September 1, 2017). 0352 –The Village of Willingdon dissolved and became part of the County of Two Hills (effective September 1, 2017). CODE NUMBERS RESERVED: 4737 Capital Region Board 0522 Metis Settlements General Council 0524 R.M. of Brittania (Sask.) 0462 Townsite of Redwood Meadows 5284 Calgary Regional Partnership STATUS CODES: 01 Cities (18)* 15 Hamlet & Urban Services Areas (396) 09 Specialized Municipalities (5) 20 Services Commissions (71) 06 Municipal Districts (64) 25 First Nations (52) 02 Towns (108) 26 Indian Reserves (138) 03 Villages (87) 50 Local Government Associations (22) 04 Summer Villages (51) 60 Emergency Districts (12) 07 Improvement Districts (8) 98 Reserved Codes (5) 08 Special Areas (3) 11 Metis Settlements (8) * (Includes Lloydminster) December 22, 2017 Page 1 of 13 CITIES CODE CITIES CODE NO. NO. Airdrie 0003 Brooks 0043 Calgary 0046 Camrose 0048 Chestermere 0356 Cold Lake 0525 Edmonton 0098 Fort Saskatchewan 0117 Grande Prairie 0132 Lacombe 0194 Leduc 0200 Lethbridge 0203 Lloydminster* 0206 Medicine Hat 0217 Red Deer 0262 Spruce Grove 0291 St. Albert 0292 Wetaskiwin 0347 *Alberta only SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITY CODE SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITY CODE NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Communities Within Specialized and Rural Municipalities (May 2019)
    Communities Within Specialized and Rural Municipalities Updated May 24, 2019 Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: 780-427-2225 Fax: 780-420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] COMMUNITIES WITHIN SPECIALIZED AND RURAL MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES COMMUNITY STATUS MUNICIPALITY Abee Hamlet Thorhild County Acadia Valley Hamlet Municipal District of Acadia No. 34 ACME Village Kneehill County Aetna Hamlet Cardston County ALBERTA BEACH Village Lac Ste. Anne County Alcomdale Hamlet Sturgeon County Alder Flats Hamlet County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Aldersyde Hamlet Foothills County Alhambra Hamlet Clearwater County ALIX Village Lacombe County ALLIANCE Village Flagstaff County Altario Hamlet Special Areas Board AMISK Village Municipal District of Provost No. 52 ANDREW Village Lamont County Antler Lake Hamlet Strathcona County Anzac Hamlet Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo Ardley Hamlet Red Deer County Ardmore Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 Ardrossan Hamlet Strathcona County ARGENTIA BEACH Summer Village County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Armena Hamlet Camrose County ARROWWOOD Village Vulcan County Ashmont Hamlet County of St. Paul No. 19 ATHABASCA Town Athabasca County Atmore Hamlet Athabasca County Balzac Hamlet Rocky View County BANFF Town Improvement District No. 09 (Banff) BARNWELL Village Municipal District of Taber BARONS Village Lethbridge County BARRHEAD Town County of Barrhead No. 11 BASHAW Town Camrose County BASSANO Town County of Newell BAWLF Village Camrose County Beauvallon Hamlet County of Two Hills No. 21 Beaver Crossing Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 Beaver Lake Hamlet Lac La Biche County Beaver Mines Hamlet Municipal District of Pincher Creek No. 9 Beaverdam Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No.
    [Show full text]
  • AREA Housing Statistics by Economic Region AREA Housing Statistics by Economic Region
    AREA Housing Statistics by Economic Region AREA Housing Statistics by Economic Region AREA Chief Economist https://albertare.configio.com/page/ann-marie-lurie-bioAnn-Marie Lurie analyzes Alberta’s resale housing statistics both provincially and regionally. In order to allow for better analysis of housing sales data, we have aligned our reporting regions to the census divisions used by Statistics Canada. Economic Region AB-NW: Athabasca – Grande Prairie – Peace River 17 16 Economic Region AB-NE: Wood Buffalo – Cold Lake Economic Region AB-W: 19 Banff – Jasper – Rocky Mountain House 18 12 Economic Region AB-Edmonton 13 14 Economic Region AB-Red Deer 11 10 Economic Region AB-E: 9 8 7 Camrose – Drumheller 15 6 4 5 Economic Region AB-Calgary Economic Region AB-S: 2 1 3 Lethbridge – Medicine Hat New reports are released on the sixth of each month, except on weekends or holidays when it is released on the following business day. AREA Housing Statistics by Economic Region 1 Alberta Economic Region North West Grande Prairie – Athabasca – Peace River Division 17 Municipal District Towns Hamlets, villages, Other Big Lakes County - 0506 High Prairie - 0147 Enilda (0694), Faust (0702), Grouard Swan Hills - 0309 (0719), Joussard (0742), Kinuso (0189), Rural Big Lakes County (9506) Clear Hills – 0504 Cleardale (0664), Worsley (0884), Hines Creek (0150), Rural Big Lakes county (9504) Lesser Slave River no 124 - Slave Lake - 0284 Canyon Creek (0898), Chisholm (0661), 0507 Flatbush (0705), Marten Beach (0780), Smith (0839), Wagner (0649), Widewater (0899), Slave Lake (0284), Rural Slave River (9507) Northern Lights County - Manning – 0212 Deadwood (0679), Dixonville (0684), 0511 North Star (0892), Notikewin (0893), Rural Northern Lights County (9511) Northern Sunrise County - Cadotte Lake (0645), Little Buffalo 0496 (0762), Marie Reine (0777), Reno (0814), St.
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Operative Stormwater Management Initiative
    CO‐OPERATIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT INITIATIVE Engineering Assessment of Preferred Stormwater Management Options FINAL APRIL, 2014 Suite 260, East Atrium 2635 – 37 Ave NE Calgary, AB T1Y 5Z6 Phone: 403-250-1362 1-800-351-0929 Fax: 403-250-1518 Co‐operative Stormwater Management Initiative April 23, 2014 c/o Western Irrigation District File: N:\29\159 CSMI\Reports\Final Box 2372 Strathmore, Alberta T1P 1K3 Attention: CSMI Partners Dear Partners: Re: Co‐operative Stormwater Management Initiative Engineering Assessment of Preferred Stormwater Management Options MPE Engineering Ltd. (MPE) is pleased to submit the “Engineering Assessment of Preferred Stormwater Management Options Report” to the Co‐operative Stormwater Management Initiative (CSMI). MPE has been proud to be part of this CSMI regional collaborative process. The initiative being undertaken by the CSMI respects the interests of all parties concerned. The willingness and cooperation demonstrated in the development of the preferred solution by all partners will form a solid basis to move forward with the regional stormwater management solution proposed. MPE looks forward to the opportunity to assist CSMI in implementing the next phases of this long‐term solution. Should you have any inquiries with regards to the report, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Yours truly, Daniel Parker, P.Eng. Senior Engineering Manager DLP/bl Enclosure Co‐operative Stormwater Management Initiative Final – April, 2014 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Co‐operative Stormwater Management Initiative (CSMI) was formed to assist municipalities and Western Irrigation District (WID) to work together to find an effective and feasible solution to an issue that affects each sector in different ways.
    [Show full text]
  • MD of Bighorn / Rocky View County
    INTERMUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Between THE MUNICIPAL DISTRICT OF BIGHORN And ROCKY VIEW COUNTY Final Draft Version 4.0 February 18, 2020 1 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Purpose ......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Goals ............................................................................................................................................. 3 1.3 Municipal Profiles ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Legislative Framework .................................................................................................................. 6 2.0 Plan Area ........................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Plan Preparation Process .............................................................................................................. 6 2.2 IDP Area ........................................................................................................................................ 7 3.0 Land Use Policies .............................................................................................................................. 9 3.1 Referrals .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bow Valley C-5.1 Bow Valley Community Overview
    June 2014 (Updated) Bow Valley C-5.1 Bow Valley Community Overview Nordegg Stolberg Alexo Ancona Crimson Bingley 12 Rosedale/Rosedale Saunders Lake y Fer nt Loche Harvie Heights Cline Strachan River Congresb Che le C = 173 1A Saskatchewan Dead Exshaw Lac Des Arcs River Man'S 1 Crossing Flats Gap Canmore Elkton p s Westcott 2 A = 113 Garfield Water Jackville Valley Lake 2A Louise Dogpound 1 Madden Bottrel Collicutt Nier Kersey 72 22 Helmsdale/N Castle Eldon Benchlands of Airdrie Junction 40 Rocky Massive Mitford 2 Bankhead Wildcat Radnor Balzac View Morley Glenbow Sawback 1 Banff Delacour Bearspaw 1 1 Conrich C = 173 1 Kananaskis 8 Pirmez White Janet Canmore Redwood Creek Elk Bennett Meadows WolfOtter Two Guns Kananaskis Tsuu Shepard Priddis Village 66 T'ina Heritage Greens Priddis De Winton Pointe B = 100 Millarville 2A Kew 22 7 2 Aldersyde Naphtha Hartell 23 40 Royalties Azure Cayley Pekisko Connemara 22 Lyndon Where subcommunities exist, letters (A, B, C, etc.) identify subcommunities; Legend numbers show the number of EDIs analyzed for each subcommunity. # of analyzed EDI 0 - 66 67 - 121 Please note: Percentages tend to be more representative when 122 - 203 ! they are based on larger numbers. 204 - 350 351 - 900 ECMap June 2014 (Updated) Bow Valley C-5.2 Additional Community Information EDI Summary: Number of EDIs available: 425 Number of EDIs used in analysis:386 % of special needs: 1.2% Age at EDI completion and gender Age Groups ≤ 5yrs 2mos 5yrs 3mos - 5yrs 6mos 5yrs 7mos - 5yrs 10mos > 5yrs 11mos Total Gender N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) F 28 (7.3%) 66 (17.1%) 55 (14.2%) 39 (10.1%) 188 (48.7%) M 23 (6.0%) 58 (15.0%) 67 (17.4%) 50 (13.0%) 198 (51.3%) FM 51 (13.2%) 124 (32.1%) 122 (31.6%) 89 (23.1%) 386 (100%) * Please note: The total number of boys and girls in each category may not add up to an exact total because gender may not have been identifed in all questionnaires.
    [Show full text]
  • March 2017 MONTHLY STATISTICS PACKAGE CREB® Region Report Mar
    March 2017 MONTHLY STATISTICS PACKAGE CREB® Region Report Mar. 17 REGIONAL HIGHLIGHTS April 3, 2017 First quarter sales totalled 294 units in Airdrie, which is ten per cent above the same period last year and comparable to the long- term average. Much of the gain was due to a rise in the number of attached sales. Persistently lower new listings in Airdrie also helped prevent further inventory gains in the resale market. However, competition from the new home market continues to weigh on resale pricing, particularly in the attached market. The unadjusted benchmark price for detached homes averaged $381,433 in the first quarter of 2017, similar to the previous quarter, but 2.6 per cent below the same time last year. There were 114 residential sales in Okotoks through the first quarter of 2017. Improved demand in March led sales to a twelve per cent increase year-over-year in first three months of the year. Stronger sales, combined with steady reductions in inventory, have prevented steeper price adjustments. The unadjusted benchmark price for a detached home totalled $431,333 during the first quarter of 2017, which is 0.20 per cent below levels from the previous quarter and 2.9 per cent below the first quarter of last year. First quarter sales in Cochrane were the second highest on record and remain well above long term trends. Increased SHARE OF SALES March 2017 activity in the attached sector has been a key driver for this market. The attached segment now 1% Calgary 2% accounts for a 31 per cent share 5% of total residential sales activity Airdrie 5% compared to only 25 per cent in 2% 2014.
    [Show full text]