Asia Briefing, Nr. 8: the Megawati Presidency

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Asia Briefing, Nr. 8: the Megawati Presidency INDONESIA Briefing Jakarta/Brussels, 10 September 2001 THE MEGAWATI PRESIDENCY OVERVIEW • Maintain national unity • Continue reform and democratisation • Normalise economic life Megawati Soekarnoputri, eldest daughter of • Uphold law, restore security and peace, and Indonesia’s founding president, Soekarno, was eradicate corruption, collusion and nepotism sworn in as president on 23 July 2001 after the • Restore Indonesia’s international credibility dismissal of her predecessor, President • Prepare for the 2004 general election. Abdurrahman Wahid. The new government faces daunting challenges in almost every field. The Her cabinet choices, her emollient remarks to the economy has yet to recover from the financial people of Aceh and Irian Jaya, her warning that her collapse of 1997-98; territorial integrity is family should avoid corruption and her statement threatened by an active insurgency in Aceh and a of clear priorities are all good signals. But there are potential insurgency in Irian Jaya; radical concerns that her government may prove unwilling decentralisation has shaken up government or unable to follow through with the reforms that structures but is not working well; ethnic and Indonesia needs, instead preferring incremental religious violence is commonplace; the steps that do little to remedy the problems. bureaucracy and legal system continue to be Megawati now needs to move rapidly beyond riddled with massive corruption and require symbolism to the implementation of clear policies extensive reform; and popular confidence in on the economy, security and judicial reform. Indonesia’s fledgling democracy is fading. The overall mood continues to be pessimistic. Her choices for ministers have been mostly praised. She has chosen technocrats for the top Although the outlook is still dim, the installation of economic jobs and has generally favoured policy Megawati as president was greeted with relief by professionals over party politicians. Her choices the Indonesian public which had become alienated for two key coordinating ministers – former by Wahid’s erratic and ineffectual leadership. The academic and ambassador Dorodjatun feared social conflict and national disintegration of Kuntjorojakti to run the economy and General which Wahid had often warned did not happen and Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono in charge of security the nation more or less returned to normal after his – have met with cautious approval. Both are 1 fall. However, beyond her nationalist rhetoric, sophisticated actors on the political stage in Megawati had given little indication of the policy Indonesia but they face key challenges that require directions her government would take. Her swift and decisive management. Dorodjatun must announcement of her government’s six-point handle the demands of the IMF and international working program, on the day that she appointed investors that Indonesia privatise assets taken over her cabinet, provided only the broadest of after the economic collapse in 1997 and overcome guidelines. The six points are: obstacles placed in way both by corrupt former owners and an increasingly nationalist parliament. Indonesian governments have shown skill in the past at macro economic management but what is 1 Wahid had warned that there would be a social now needed is a deft handling of micro-economic revolution, six provinces would declare their independence reforms. and that the DPR/MPR building might be burnt down if he were deposed. The Megawati Presidency ICG Indonesia Briefing Paper, 10 September 2001 Page 2 As Coordinating Minister for Political and Security I. THE NEW GOVERNMENT Affairs, Bambang Yudhoyono faces a pressing situation in the rebellious province of Aceh. To defuse demands for independence, the government Whatever Megawati’s capacity to lead the needs to move quickly to end human rights abuses government, she enjoyed wide popular support and and implement a special autonomy package. her party – exploiting her family name – won more Reform of the military, including a reduction in votes than any other party in the 1999 general their role in government across the archipelago and election. But, with only 33.8 per cent, her party, radical changes to the way it is financed, will test the Indonesian Democratic Party – Struggle (PDI- Yudhoyono’s credentials as not only a reformer P) has only 153 of the 500 seats in parliament but as a decisive manager. (DPR) and only 185 of the 695 members of the People’s Consultative Assembly (MPR) that elects While Megawati has won praise for steering clear the president.2 Megawati – perhaps naively – of officials with a reputation for corruption, her thought her ‘victory’ in the general election would delayed choice for Attorney General has injected a ensure her election as president and showed little note of real concern. M.A. Rahman is a little interest in doing the deals necessary to build a known career prosecutor who has spent 35 years in winning coalition. In the end she felt betrayed the notoriously corrupt Attorney General’s Office. when her old friend and ally, Gus Dur, as Wahid is The appointment has signalled that Megawati may commonly known, stitched together an improbable not take the robust steps against corruption that coalition at the last moment to snatch the Indonesia desperately needs. It has also led to presidency from her hands in October 1999. anxieties about the lingering influence of those military leaders who are determined to avoid Megawati continued to believe that the presidency prosecution for their role in human rights abuses in was rightfully hers but refused to take the lead in East Timor and elsewhere. Rahman was earlier undermining Wahid. As opposition grew to his responsible for a limp investigation into abuses in leadership, Megawati remained silent but allowed East Timor. He is seen as an unlikely figure to take younger members of her party to join the growing on the corruption that in recent years has spread band of members of the DPR who had lost from the centre of power and become ubiquitous confidence in the president. Although she might and unpredictable. well have accepted a compromise deal which would have given her control over the government and left Wahid as the nominal president, a firm offer was never made and – saddened by the insulting remarks that he often made about her – she simply insisted on following the constitutional course that she knew would result in the president’s dismissal and her own succession.3 The composition of the new government provided some clues to Megawati’s priorities. The cabinet 2 Under Indonesia’s presidential constitution, the president and vice president are elected – separately – by the MPR whose 695 members consist of the 500 members of the DPR, 130 regional representatives elected by regional legislatures and 65 appointed members representing special interests in society. Thirty-eight appointed military and police officers will continue to sit in the DPR until 2004 and in the MPR until 2009. 3 On the process that led to the dismissal of President Wahid, see ICG Briefings, Indonesia’s Presidential Crisis, Jakarta/Brussels (21 February 2001) and Indonesia’s Presidential Crisis: The Second Round, Jakarta/Brussels (21 May 2001) The Megawati Presidency ICG Indonesia Briefing Paper, 10 September 2001 Page 3 met several key criteria. First, its membership Coordinating Minister for Political, Social and provided representation to the main political forces Security Affairs, retired General Susilo Bambang in the DPR. Gus Dur’s fall was partly due to his Yudhoyono. During the first two rounds of voting unwillingness to cultivate political support in the no candidate achieved an absolute majority but in DPR – and, indeed, his tendency to raise issues the final round Hamzah Haz scored a comfortable that brought him into direct confrontation with victory over Akbar Tanjung. major sections of the parliament.4 Second, while the political parties needed to be accommodated, it Hamzah’s party had won only 11 per cent of the was important to appoint qualified ministers to key votes in the 1999 general election but he also policy-making positions, regardless of political represented the loose alliance of Muslim parties – affiliation. This was especially true in the case of known as the Central Axis – that had been formed the economics team because Indonesia could not by the speaker of the MPR, Amien Rais. The expect essential international support unless the Central Axis parties and its allies had won about economics ministers enjoyed international 20 per cent of the votes in the general election and confidence. And third, given that one of the held around 140 seats in the MPR. In 1999 the charges against Gus Dur related to his failure to Central Axis bloc had provided crucial support for implement an MPR decree on eradicating Gus Dur, not because they were attracted to him corruption, it was important that the cabinet should but due to their total opposition to Megawati. They not include leaders who are blatantly vulnerable on had doubted Megawati’s Islamic credentials, that score. suspected that she was excessively influenced by Christian politicians in the PDI-P, and in any case believed that a Muslim country could not be led by A. THE VICE PRESIDENT a woman. But circumstances had changed by 2001. Under Indonesia’s constitution, the vice president Hamzah’s victory was assured when the PDI-P is elected by the MPR separately from the swung its votes in favour of Hamzah and he president. Megawati had initially preferred to leave gratefully accepted them. Megawati’s calculations the vice presidency unoccupied. The constitution probably included three considerations. First, makes it clear that a deposed president can only be Hamzah was seen as the least threatening of the succeeded by the vice president. In the absence of candidates. Hamzah is essentially a party politician a vice president, therefore, it would be necessary whose appeal hardly extends beyond his own for the diverse parties in the MPR first to reach party.
Recommended publications
  • The Politics of Military Reform in Post-Suharto Indonesia: Elite Conflict, Nationalism, and Institutional Resistance
    Policy Studies 23 The Politics of Military Reform in Post-Suharto Indonesia: Elite Conflict, Nationalism, and Institutional Resistance Marcus Mietzner East-West Center Washington East-West Center The East-West Center is an internationally recognized education and research organization established by the U.S. Congress in 1960 to strengthen understanding and relations between the United States and the countries of the Asia Pacific. Through its programs of cooperative study, training, seminars, and research, the Center works to promote a stable, peaceful, and prosperous Asia Pacific community in which the United States is a leading and valued partner. Funding for the Center comes from the U.S. government, private foundations, individuals, cor- porations, and a number of Asia Pacific governments. East-West Center Washington Established on September 1, 2001, the primary function of the East- West Center Washington is to further the East-West Center mission and the institutional objective of building a peaceful and prosperous Asia Pacific community through substantive programming activities focused on the theme of conflict reduction, political change in the direction of open, accountable, and participatory politics, and American understanding of and engagement in Asia Pacific affairs. The Politics of Military Reform in Post-Suharto Indonesia: Elite Conflict, Nationalism, and Institutional Resistance Policy Studies 23 ___________ The Politics of Military Reform in Post-Suharto Indonesia: Elite Conflict, Nationalism, and Institutional Resistance _____________________ Marcus Mietzner Copyright © 2006 by the East-West Center Washington The Politics of Military Reform in Post-Suharto Indonesia: Elite Conflict, Nationalism, and Institutional Resistance by Marcus Mietzner ISBN 978-1-932728-45-3 (online version) ISSN 1547-1330 (online version) Online at: www.eastwestcenterwashington.org/publications East-West Center Washington 1819 L Street, NW, Suite 200 Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Komnas HAM : the Cases 41
    THESES SIS/LIBRARY TELEPHONE: +61 2 6125 4631 R.G. MENZIES LIBRARY BUILDING NO:2 FACSIMILE: +61 2 6125 4063 THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY EMAIL: [email protected] CANBERRA ACT 0200 AUSTRALIA USE OF THESES This copy is supplied for purposes of private study and research only. Passages from the thesis may not be copied or closely paraphrased without the written consent of the author. Komnas HAM and the Politics of Human Rights in Indonesia Jessica M. Ramsden Smith / March 1998 A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Arts (Asian Studies) at the Australian National University Except where otherwise indicated this thesis is my own work d· r·-----·-···----·- -· ...... f.9..:.£.:1.~ .. iii Acknowledgments This study is the product of research carried out in Canberra and Jakarta between 1994 - 1997. The work is my own, but I would like to record my thanks to those who helped at various stages. I am grateful for the generous time and advice given by interviewees. Kornnas members were helpful and encouraging. I would particularly like to thank Vice­ Chairpersons Miriam Budiardjo and Marzuk:i Darusman, as well as Charles Himawan, (the late) Roekmini Koesoemo Astoeti and Deplu's Hassan Wirayuda Thanks to Dr. Harold Crouch who supervised and discussed my work, and offered his learned insight into Indonesian politics. Finally, my thanks to my husband Shannon, for his patience and support iv Contents Glossary and Abbreviations v 1 Introduction 1 P.art One : Tbe Origins of Kornnas HAM 2 Human Rights in Indonesia : The Domestic Context
    [Show full text]
  • House of Representatives Republic of Indonesia
    HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA ADDRESS OF THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA AT THE JOINT SESSION OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA AND THE REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVES COUNCIL OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA FRIDAY, 14 AUGUST 2020 Assalamualaikum arrahmatullahi wabarakatuh May peace be upon us all Om swastiastu 1 Namo buddhaya Greetings of Virtue Thank you Speaker of the People’s Consultative Assembly of the Republic of Indonesia, for reminding us all about the important existence and vital roles the state institutions play . As we are all aware, after the amendment of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the country has seen some changes to its administration system, position, and authorities of the state institutions. Therefore, it is crucial to maintain collaboration among state institutions, as there are some authorities that can be implemented either independently or collaboratively. The current state institutions have reflected the balance of power. Now I would like to deliver the Address of the Speaker of the House of Representatives at this Joint Session between the House of the Representatives of 2 the Republic of Indonesia (DPR RI) and the Regional Representatives Council of the Republic of Indonesia (DPD RI). • Your Excellency, President of the Republic of Indonesia, Bapak Joko Widodo, • Your Excellency, Vice President of the Republic of Indonesia, Bapak KH. Ma’ruf Amin, • Your Excellency, the Fifth President of the Republic of Indonesia,
    [Show full text]
  • Persentase Hasil Perhitungan Suara Sah Pemilu Presiden/Wakil Presiden Tahun 2009 Menurut Provinsi
    Persentase Hasil Perhitungan Suara Sah Pemilu Presiden/Wakil Presiden Tahun 2009 Menurut Provinsi Pasangan Calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Provinsi Total Suara Sah Megawati Soekarno Putri/ Prabowo Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono/ Muhammad Jusuf Kalla/ Wiranto Subianto Boediono Aceh 2.4 93.3 4.4 2,245,119.0 Sumatera Utara 0.0 93.3 6.7 4,539,195.0 Sumatera Barat 5.9 79.9 14.2 2,287,153.0 Riau 23.7 64.1 12.2 2,345,315.0 Kepulauan Riau 26.5 64.4 9.1 748,576.0 Jambi 29.2 59.4 11.4 1,560,500.0 Sumatera Selatan 39.6 54.1 6.4 3,838,344.0 Bengkulu 23.2 64.1 12.6 850,231.0 Lampung 24.1 70.2 5.7 3,992,345.0 Kepulauan Bangka 38.6 48.7 12.7 549,694.0 DKI Jakarta 20.4 70.4 9.2 5,035,956.0 Jawa Barat 26.2 65.1 8.7 22,104,722.0 Banten 27.0 65.1 8.0 5,149,798.0 Jawa Tengah 38.3 53.1 8.7 17,490,429.0 DI Yogyakarta 28.1 61.7 10.2 1,975,647.0 Jawa Timur 30.4 60.3 9.3 19,450,762.0 Bali 51.9 43.0 5.1 1,912,337.0 Nusa Tenggara Barat 8.3 74.6 17.1 2,269,826.0 Nusa Tenggara Timur 41.3 52.7 6.0 2,134,794.0 Kalimantan Barat 37.1 54.0 8.9 2,286,206.0 Kalimantan Tengah 42.3 48.3 9.4 1,016,711.0 Kalimantan Selatan 21.8 64.0 14.2 1,728,858.0 Kalimantan Timur 27.6 51.9 20.5 1,605,372.0 Sulawesi Utara 31.2 54.8 14.0 1,262,275.0 Gorontalo 6.5 44.2 49.3 545,504.0 Sulawesi Tengah 8.4 50.5 41.1 1,324,798.0 Sulawesi Selatan 4.0 31.6 64.4 4,222,786.0 Sulawesi Tenggara 8.0 45.6 46.4 1,094,115.0 Sulawesi Barat 4.6 50.8 44.6 578,929.0 Maluku 24.5 53.7 21.8 787,985.0 Maluku Utara 20.3 38.9 40.7 551,513.0 Papua 5.6 74.1 20.3 1,860,096.0 Papua Barat 10.5 74.0 15.6 424,043.0 Luar Negeri 14.0 69.1 17.0 340,410.0 Total Perolehan Suara 26.8 60.8 12.4 121,504,481.0 Sumber: Komisi Pemilihan Umum Hasil Perhitungan Suara Sah Pemilu Presiden/Wakil Presiden Putaran Pertama Tahun 2004 Provinsi Pasangan Calon Presiden/Wakil Presiden Jumlah Hamzah Haz/ Agum H.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Indonesia' S Historic First Presidential Elections
    UNISCI Discussion Papers ISSN: 1696-2206 [email protected] Universidad Complutense de Madrid España SEBASTIAN, LEONARD C. Indonesia' s historic first presidential elections UNISCI Discussion Papers, núm. 6, octubre, 2004, pp. 1-8 Universidad Complutense de Madrid Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=76711307006 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative UNISCI DISCUSSION PAPERS Octubre de 2004 INDONESIA’S HISTORIC FIRST PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS AUTHOR1: LEONARD C. SEBASTIAN 2 Institute for Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS), Singapore DATE: October 2004 September 20 marked the end of a momentous year for Indonesian politics concluding a third leg of a series of elections with an array of electoral formats which began in April ranging from an open list proportional system for the House of People’s Representatives and the House of Regional People’s Representatives; a single non-transferable vote system for new Regional Representatives Council and culminating with two round majoritarian system for the presidential election. Being the third largest democracy after the USA and India, Indonesia’s election mechanism is complex and required significant voter education initiatives to socialize the new election format. The general elections held on 5 April was for a fully elected House of People’s Representatives (DPR, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat), the House of Regional People’s Representatives (DPRD, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah) or the regional assemblies at the provincial and district level and the new Regional Representatives Council (DPD, Dewan Perwakilan Daerah).
    [Show full text]
  • Idss Commentaries
    IDSS COMMENTARIES (26/2004) IDSS Commentaries are intended to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy relevant background and analysis of contemporary developments. The views of the authors are their own and do not represent the official position of IDSS. ___________________________________________________________________________ The Paradox of Indonesia’s “Post-Majapahit” Presidency: Historic Direct Election Makes Yudhoyono Most Popular Leader with possibly the Weakest Government since Suharto’s fall Yang Razali Kassim * 12th July 2004 Goenawan Mohamad, the veteran writer, describes the July 5 direct presidential election as a historic turning point ushering Indonesia into the “post-Majapahit” era. Never before since the time of the old Javanese kingdom have the people had the freedom to choose their own ruler. This is also the first time since the birth of the Indonesian nation state that they can elect their own “king” - without intermediaries or “people’s representatives” acting on their behalf. Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, as widely predicted by various polls, is emerging as the most popular choice, with Yusuf Kalla as his vice-president. The emergence of Susilo – “SBY” as he is widely known – at the expense of incumbent Megawati Sukarnoputri is the consequence of a “deficiency fatigue”: Tired of weak government, the people clamoured for change and rejuvenation and swung behind the candidate who to them came like a gush of fresh air. The result – a significant lead of 33.8% of the votes counted so far for SBY, cutting across ideological, ethnic and religious affiliations, according to an exit poll released two days after the election by the local research body, LP3ES, and the United States-based National Democratic Institute (NDI).
    [Show full text]
  • INDO 78 0 1108140653 61 92.Pdf (681.3Kb)
    Indonesia's Accountability Trap: Party Cartels and Presidential Power after Democratic Transition Dan Slater1 Idolization and "Immediate Help!": Campaigning as if Voters Mattered On July 14, 2004, just nine days after Indonesia's first-ever direct presidential election, a massive inferno ripped through the impoverished, gang-infested district of Tanah Abang in central Jakarta. Hundreds of dwellings were destroyed and over a thousand Jakartans were rendered homeless. While such catastrophes are nothing unusual in the nation's chaotic capital, the political responses suggested that some interesting changes are afoot in Indonesia's fledgling electoral democracy. The next day, presidential frontrunner Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono (SBY) took a break from watching his burgeoning vote totals at the five-star Borobodur Hotel to visit Tanah Abang's fire victims. Since he had just clinched pole position in Indonesia's run-off presidential election in late September, SBY's public appearance made fantastic copy. The handsome former general comforted distraught families, then crept, head and shoulders protruding through the sunroof of his campaign minivan, through a swarm of star-struck locals. Never mind the knock-off reality-television program screening for talent just a few miles away at the swanky Semanggi shopping complex; here, in one of Jakarta's least swanky settings, appeared to be the true Indonesian Idol. 1 This article draws on a comparative project with Marc Craighead, conversations and collaboration with whom have been invaluable in refining the theoretical arguments presented here. It has also greatly benefited from the thoughtful comments of Jamie Davidson, Dirk Tomsa, and an anonymous reviewer at Indonesia; the savvy and sensitive editing of Deborah Homsher; and generous fieldwork support from the Academy for Educational Development, Emory University, and the Ford Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • INDONESIA in 2000 a Shaky Start for Democracy
    INDONESIA IN 2000 A Shaky Start for Democracy R. William Liddle At the end of 1999 Indonesia appeared to have com- pleted a successful transition to democracy after more than four decades of dictatorship. Free elections had been held for the national legislature (DPR, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat). The People’s Consultative Assembly (MPR, Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat), a uniquely Indonesian institution com- prising members of the DPR plus regional and group representatives, had chosen a new president, the charismatic traditionalist Muslim cleric Abdur- rahman Wahid (called Gus Dur) and vice-president, Megawati Sukarnoputri, daughter of Indonesia’s founding father and first president Sukarno, for the 1999–2004 term. Gus Dur, whose Partai Kebangkitan Bangsa (PKB, Na- tional Awakening Party) holds only 11% of the DPR seats, had then ap- pointed a national unity cabinet consisting of representatives of all of the major parties. Twelve months later, Gus Dur is widely regarded, both at home and abroad, as a failed president. He narrowly escaped dismissal by the MPR, which met for its first annual session in August 2000. Most observers and politicians concur that his personal legitimacy continues to decline and that the main obstacle to his removal now is fear that his likely replacement, Megawati, would be an even worse president. This extraordinary fall is largely the consequence of Gus Dur’s own disas- trous choices. He has been unwilling to act like a politician in a democracy, that is, to build a broad base of support and adopt a set of policies responsive to the interests of this constituency. Instead, he has acted impulsively and inconsistently, often without consulting his own staff, let alone his putative R.
    [Show full text]
  • Voters and the New Indonesian Democracy
    VOTERS AND THE NEW INDONESIAN DEMOCRACY Saiful Mujani Lembaga Survei Indonesia (LSI) R. William Liddle The Ohio State University November 2009 RESEARCH QUESTIONS • WHY HAVE INDONESIAN VOTERS VOTED AS THEY HAVE IN THREE PARLIAMENTARY AND TWO DIRECT PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS IN 1999, 2004, AND 2009? • WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS OF THESE PATTERNS OF VOTING BEHAVIOR FOR THE QUALITY OF INDONESIAN DEMOCRACY? THE EMPIRICAL RESEARCH SIX NATIONAL LSI OPINION SURVEYS: ONE IN 1999, THREE IN 2004, TWO IN 2009. FACTORS EXAMINED: SOCIOLOGICAL (RELIGION/ALIRAN, REGION/ETHNICITY, SOCIAL CLASS) LEADERS/CANDIDATES PARTY ID MEDIA CAMPAIGN (2009) INCUMBENT’S PERFORMANCE Parties in post-transition democratic Indonesian parliamentary elections: percent of votes (and seats) PARTIES 1999 2004 2009 votes (seats) votes (seats) votes (seats) PDIP 34 (33) 18.5 (20) 14 (17) GOLKAR 22 (26) 22 (23) 14 (19) PKB 13 (11) 11 (10) 5 (5) PPP 11 (13) 8 (11) 5 (7) PAN 7 (7) 6 (10) 6 (8) PK/PKS 2 7 (8) 8 (10) DEMOKRAT - 7 (10) 21 (26) GERINDRA - - 5 (5) HANURA - - 4 (3) OTHER 14 (8) 20 (9) 28 (-) TOTAL 100.0 100.0 100.0 Vote for presidents/vice-presidents in democratic Indonesian elections 2004-2009 (%) President-Vice President Pairs 2004 2004 2009 First Round Second Round Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono- 34 61 61 Jusuf Kalla (2004); Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono- Boediono (2009) Megawati Sukarnoputri- 26 39 27 Hasyim Muzadi (2004); Megawati Sukarnoputri- Prabowo Subianto (2009) Wiranto-Solahuddin Wahid 24 12 (2004); Jusuf Kalla-Wiranto (2009) Amien Rais-Siswono 14 Yudhohusodo Hamzah Haz-Agum
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Malley
    T he 7th D evelopment Cabinet: Loyal to a Fault? Michael Malley Five years ago, amid speculation that B. J. Habibie and his allies in the Association of Indonesian Muslim Intellectuals (ICMI) would gain a large number of seats in the cabinet, State Secretary Moerdiono announced that "expertise" would be Soeharto's chief criterion for choosing ministers. This year, despite the economic crisis that enveloped the country, few people even thought to suggest that Soeharto sought the most technically qualified assistants. As the outgoing cabinet's term wore to a close, the jockeying for influence among ministers and their would-be successors emphasized the most important qualification of any who would join the new cabinet: loyalty. As if to diminish any surprise at the lengths he would go to create a cabinet of loyalists, Soeharto fired his central bank chief, Soedradjad Djiwandono, in mid- February, just two weeks before the 6 ^ Development Cabinet's term expired. Together with the finance minister, Mar'ie Muhammad, Soedradjad had worked closely with the International Monetary Fund to reach the reform-for-aid agreements Soeharto signed in October 1997 and January this year. Their support for reforms that would strike directly at palace-linked business interests seems to have upset the president, and neither were expected to retain their posts in the 7 ^ Cabinet. But Soedradjad made the further mistake of opposing the introduction of a currency board system to fix the rupiah's value to that of the US dollar. The scheme's main Indonesian proponents were Fuad Bawazier, one of Mar'ie's subordinates, and Peter Gontha, the principal business adviser to Soeharto's son Bambang Trihatmodjo.
    [Show full text]
  • Backlash Against Foreign Investment Regime: Indonesia’S Experience
    Backlash against Foreign Investment Regime: Indonesia’s Experience Herliana A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2017 Reading Committee: Dongsheng Zang, Chair John O. Haley Melissa Durkee Program Authorized to Offer Degree: School of Law ©Copyright 2017 Herliana ii University of Washington Abstract Backlash against Foreign Investment Regime: Indonesia’s Experience Herliana Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Dongsheng Zang School of Law This study investigates Indonesia’s changing attitude from embracing to repudiating foreign direct investments. Opened its door for foreign investment in the late of 1960s and enjoyed significant economic growth as the result, the country suddenly changed its foreign investment policy in 2012 to be more protectionist towards domestic investors and skeptical towards foreign investors. The essential issues to be discussed in this research are: what motivates Indonesia to move away from global investment regime; what actions the country has taken as manifestation of resentment against the regime; and who are the actors behind such a backlash. This is a qualitative study which aims at gaining a deep understanding of a legal development of Indonesia’s foreign investment. It aims to provide explanation of the current phenomenon taking place in the country. Data were collected through interviews and documents. This research reveals that liberalization of foreign investment law has become the major cause of resentment towards the foreign investment. Liberalization which requires privatization and openness toward foreign capital has failed to deliver welfare to the Indonesian people. Instead, foreign investors have pushed local business players, especially small and medium enterprises, out of the market.
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesia Backgrounder: a Guide to the 2004 Elections
    INDONESIA BACKGROUNDER: A GUIDE TO THE 2004 ELECTIONS 18 December 2003 Asia Report N°71 Jakarta/Brussels TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. ELECTORAL REFORM .............................................................................................. 2 A. THE OLD SYSTEM .................................................................................................................2 B. DIRECT ELECTION OF THE PRESIDENT ...................................................................................2 C. ELECTION OF LEGISLATURES ................................................................................................4 D. MORE OF THE SAME?............................................................................................................5 III. PARTIES .........................................................................................................................6 A. PDI-P ...................................................................................................................................6 B. GOLKAR................................................................................................................................7 C. PKB .....................................................................................................................................9 D. PPP.......................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]