Elizabeth and Middleton Marine Survey 2014

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Elizabeth and Middleton Marine Survey 2014 2014 MARINE ECOLOGICAL SURVEY OF ELIZABETH AND MIDDLETON REEFS, LORD HOWE COMMONWEALTH MARINE RESERVE Andrew S. Hoey*, Morgan S. Pratchett, Jacob Johansen, and Jessica Hoey FINAL REPORT – June 1st, 2014 Produced for The Department of the Environment *Corresponding author – Dr Andrew Hoey, ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville QLD 4811. E-mail: Andrew.Hoey1@jcu.edu.au, Telephone/ Fax: (07) 47815979 / 47816722 Page 1 In responding to a tender from the Department of Environment, a team of researchers representing the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies at James Cook University (JCU) completed surveys of the coral reef fauna at Elizabeth and Middleton Reef. The field team comprised Professor Morgan Pratchett, Dr Andrew Hoey, Dr Jacob Johansen and Mrs Jessica Hoey. All the abovementioned researchers contributed to the preparation of this report. © Commonwealth of Australia 2014 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Attorney General’s Department, Robert Garran Offices, National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600 or posted at http://www.ag.gov.au/cca The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government. This report has been produced for the sole use of the party who requested it. The application or use of this report and of any data or information (including results of experiments, conclusions, and recommendations) contained within it shall be at the sole risk and responsibility of that party. JCU does not provide any warranty or assurance as to the accuracy or suitability of the whole or any part of the report, for any particular purpose or application. Address all correspondence regarding this report to Dr Andrew Hoey. E-mail: Andrew.Hoey1@jcu.edu.au Page 2 1 Executive Summary Elizabeth and Middleton Reefs are of considerable ecological importance. They are the southernmost open ocean platform reefs in the world, and support a unique mix of tropical and subtropical species, including several endemic species. Due to their isolation they also provide a refuge for the ‘vulnerable’ black cod. The purpose of this study was to undertake rigorous surveys of shallow coral reef habitats at Elizabeth and Middleton Reefs to assess the current condition of these habitats and detect any changes in the period since the last survey, in March 2011. Field-based surveys of habitat structure (percentage cover of hard and soft corals, sponges and algae, topographic complexity), coral replenishment (juvenile corals), coral health (the incidence of coral disease and coral predation), functionally important reef fishes (e.g., surgeonfishes, parrotfishes, drummers), endemic fishes, and invertebrates (holothurians, urchins and the corallivorous crown-of-thorns starfish) were undertaken at Elizabeth and Middleton Reefs from 4th to 9th March, 2014. Two depth zones (shallow reef crest and deep reef slope) were sampled at each of 16 sites, encompassing exposed reef fronts, back reefs and lagoonal habitats. Apex predators, including Galapagos sharks and Black cod, were also sampled at each site, using replicate 250 - 500m transects. Main findings include: • Mean cover of hard (scleractinian) corals (Elizabeth Reef: 29.2%; Middleton Reef: 19.3%) was slightly lower than 2011 levels, notably within lagoonal habitats. • Coral cover at both Elizabeth and Middleton Reefs is lower than has been recorded on the southern Great Barrier Reef and Lord Howe Island, suggesting that coral assemblages are recovering from previous disturbances. The protracted recovery appears to be related to low rates of coral replenishment and coral growth. • The health of existing corals was generally high, with a low incidence of coral bleaching and coral disease, and very low densities of coral predators, such as the crown-of-thorns starfish. Consequently these were not likely to be having a Page 3 major influence on coral assemblages, and seemed unlikely to be the cause of observed reductions in coral cover. • Cover of macroalgae (conspicuous seaweeds >5 mm in height) was generally low (ca. 10%) and displayed limited change to 2011 levels. The exception to this was the back reef on Middleton Reef where macroalgae doubled from 2011 and currently covers over 2/3 of the shallow habitats at these sites. • The density and biomass of functionally important herbivorous fishes, namely parrotfishes, surgeonfishes and drummers, was generally stable between 2011 and 2014. The only exception was a significant reduction in the abundance of juvenile parrotfish within the lagoons, and appears to be related to a reduction of branching corals in these habitats. • Densities of endemic fishes (Amphiprion mccullochi, Chaetodon tricinctus, and Coris bulbifrons) varied greatly among study sites, but were generally greater than or equal to densities recorded in 2011. The densities of C. tricinctus and C. bulbifrons increased on both reefs from 2011 to 2014, while densities of A. mccullochi increased on Middleton and remained stable on Elizabeth Reef. • Densities of the Galapagos reef shark were extremely high in 2014, and were approximately double those recorded in 2011 and up to 36 times higher than recorded in 2006. All observed were small immature individuals suggesting that the shallow water environments of Elizabeth and Middleton Reefs are an important nursery habitat for this species. • Densities of black cod, listed as vulnerable in NSW waters and under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, remained relatively unchanged between 2011 and 2014. • Elizabeth and Middleton Reefs appear to support healthy fish assemblages and coral assemblages in a state of recovery. The key threats to these reefs are likely to be i) increasing seawater temperatures, ii) physical damage from severe storms, and iii) outbreaks of crown-of-thorns starfish. The impact of these threats is likely to be magnified, relative to low latitude reefs, by the limited capacity for recovery (slow growth and limited replenishment of corals) following such disturbances. Page 4 2 Recommendations 1. Given the isolation and apparent constraints on population and community resilience of reef corals and associated organisms at Elizabeth and Middleton Reefs, anthropogenic disturbances should be minimized through the maintenance of current protection and regulation. 2. Ongoing and regular (at least every 2-3 years) monitoring is critical to assess effects of historical (outbreaks of Acanthaster planci) and emerging threats (e.g., climate change) to corals, and to monitor population fluctuation in key fish species, such as the Galapagos shark and Black cod. This monitoring is a key requirement for effective long-term management of these unique assemblages. 3. In addition to monitoring the population status of key benthic and fish taxa (i.e., corals, macroalgae, herbivorous fish, apex predators), process-orientated monitoring of growth, mortality, and recruitment of these groups would greatly improve our understanding of the dynamics and resilience of these unique coral reef assemblages. This would however, require increased frequency and duration of survey trips. In particular, there is a clear need to understand the determinants of macroalgal abundance and biomass, and the rates of recruitment, growth and mortality of coral assemblages. 4. The current survey highlighted the benefits of matching previous sampling methods and sites, facilitating rigorous temporal comparisons of fish and benthic communities for the first time. Future sampling should continue to use sampling methods that are compatible (if not identical) with the past two surveys (2011 and 2014) and, as a minimum, continue to survey the same sites to maximise detection of long-term trends. Implementation of comparable sampling methods across all Commonwealth Marine Reserves would also enable meaningful spatial and temporal comparisons. 5. A lack of access to data from previous surveys limited our capacity to evaluate long-term trends at these reefs. To facilitate spatial and temporal comparisons, all data arising from these surveys should be made publicly available in a centralised and accessible database, or within an appropriate existing Page 5 database. At the very minimum, all reports relevant to each of the offshore Commonwealth reserves should be digitised and made publically available by the Department of the Environment. Page 6 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary 3 2. Recommendations 5 3. Introduction 12 3.1 Elizabeth and Middleton Reefs 14 (Lord Howe Commonwealth Marine Reserve) 3.2 Objectives and scope 17 4. Methods 18 4.1 Habitat structure 18 4.2 Reef fishes 22 4.3 Unitary invertebrates (e.g., sea cucumbers) 23 4.4 Species richness 23 5. Findings 24 5.1 Habitat structure 24 5.1.1 Coral cover 24 5.1.2 Macroalgal cover 26 5.1.3 Temporal changes in coral and macroalgae 26 5.1.4 Topographic complexity 31 5.2 Replenishment and resilience of coral populations 32 5.2.1 Juvenile corals 32 5.1.2 Coral predators 39 5.1.3 Coral condition 40 5.3 Coral reef fishes 43 5.3.1 Roving herbivorous fishes 43 5.3.2 Endemic fishes 53 5.3.3 Apex predators 59 5.3.4 New species records 62 5.4 Unitary invertebrates 63 5.4.1 Sea cucumbers (Holothurians) 63 5.4.2 Sea urchins (Echinoids) 65 6. Conclusions 69 Page 7 6.1 Habitat structure 69 6.2 Reef fishes 73 6.3 Unitary invertebrates 77 7. Acknowledgements 80 8. References 81 Page 8 List of Figures Figure 1: Map showing the location of the study sites. (a) Geographic location of 19 Elizabeth and Middleton reefs off Australia’s east coast. (b) Locations of the nine study sites on Middleton Reef. (c) Location of the seven study sites on Elizabeth Reef. Note that site 6 on Elizabeth Reef was separated into shallow (6s) and deep (6d) due to the lack of shallow and deep habitat in close proximity.
Recommended publications
  • Field Guide to the Nonindigenous Marine Fishes of Florida
    Field Guide to the Nonindigenous Marine Fishes of Florida Schofield, P. J., J. A. Morris, Jr. and L. Akins Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for their use by the United States goverment. Pamela J. Schofield, Ph.D. U.S. Geological Survey Florida Integrated Science Center 7920 NW 71st Street Gainesville, FL 32653 pschofield@usgs.gov James A. Morris, Jr., Ph.D. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science Center for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research 101 Pivers Island Road Beaufort, NC 28516 james.morris@noaa.gov Lad Akins Reef Environmental Education Foundation (REEF) 98300 Overseas Highway Key Largo, FL 33037 lad@reef.org Suggested Citation: Schofield, P. J., J. A. Morris, Jr. and L. Akins. 2009. Field Guide to Nonindigenous Marine Fishes of Florida. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 92. Field Guide to Nonindigenous Marine Fishes of Florida Pamela J. Schofield, Ph.D. James A. Morris, Jr., Ph.D. Lad Akins NOAA, National Ocean Service National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 92. September 2009 United States Department of National Oceanic and National Ocean Service Commerce Atmospheric Administration Gary F. Locke Jane Lubchenco John H. Dunnigan Secretary Administrator Assistant Administrator Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................ i Methods .....................................................................................................ii
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Plate Biogeography, with Special Reference to Shorefishes
    Pacific Plate Biogeography, with Special Reference to Shorefishes VICTOR G. SPRINGER m SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY • NUMBER 367 SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Emphasis upon publication as a means of "diffusing knowledge" was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the Institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoo/ogy Smithsonian Studies in Air and Space Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report the research and collections of its various museums and bureaux or of professional colleagues in the world cf science and scholarship. The publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institutions throughout the world. Papers or monographs submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to its own review for format and style, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums or bureaux, where the manuscripts are given substantive review.
    [Show full text]
  • Length-Based Stock Assessment Area WPP
    Report Code: AR_717_120820 Length-Based Stock Assessment Of A Species Complex In Deepwater Demersal Fisheries Targeting Snappers In Indonesia Fishery Management Area WPP 717 DRAFT - NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION. TNC-IFCP Technical Paper Peter J. Mous, Wawan B. IGede, Jos S. Pet AUGUST 12, 2020 THE NATURE CONSERVANCY INDONESIA FISHERIES CONSERVATION PROGRAM AR_717_120820 The Nature Conservancy Indonesia Fisheries Conservation Program Ikat Plaza Building - Blok L Jalan By Pass Ngurah Rai No.505, Pemogan, Denpasar Selatan Denpasar 80221 Bali, Indonesia Ph. +62-361-244524 People and Nature Consulting International Grahalia Tiying Gading 18 - Suite 2 Jalan Tukad Pancoran, Panjer, Denpasar Selatan Denpasar 80225 Bali, Indonesia 1 THE NATURE CONSERVANCY INDONESIA FISHERIES CONSERVATION PROGRAM AR_717_120820 Table of contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Materials and methods for data collection, analysis and reporting 7 2.1 Frame Survey . 7 2.2 Vessel Tracking and CODRS . 7 2.3 Data Quality Control . 8 2.4 Length-Frequency Distributions, CpUE, and Total Catch . 8 2.5 I-Fish Community . 29 3 Fishing grounds and traceability 33 4 Length-based assessments of Top 20 most abundant species in CODRS samples includ- ing all years in WPP 717 35 5 Discussion and conclusions 78 6 References 85 2 THE NATURE CONSERVANCY INDONESIA FISHERIES CONSERVATION PROGRAM AR_717_120820 1 Introduction This report presents a length-based assessment of multi-species and multi gear demersal fisheries targeting snappers, groupers, emperors and grunts in fisheries management area (WPP) 717, covering mostly deep western Pacific waters as well as the large Cenderawasih Bay area and coastal waters with steep slopes of the northern coast of West Papua and the Halmahera Sea to the north east of Halmahera (Figure 1.1).
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Species Diversity of Coral Triangle Artisanal Fisheries: a DNA Barcode Reference Library for the Shore Fishes Retailed at Ambon Harbor (Indonesia)
    Received: 19 September 2019 | Revised: 30 January 2020 | Accepted: 3 February 2020 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6128 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Assessing species diversity of Coral Triangle artisanal fisheries: A DNA barcode reference library for the shore fishes retailed at Ambon harbor (Indonesia) Gino Limmon1 | Erwan Delrieu-Trottin2,3 | Jesaya Patikawa1 | Frederik Rijoly1 | Hadi Dahruddin4 | Frédéric Busson2,5 | Dirk Steinke6 | Nicolas Hubert2 1Pusat Kemaritiman dan Kelautan, Universitas Pattimura (Maritime and Marine Abstract Science Center of Excellence), Ambon, The Coral Triangle (CT), a region spanning across Indonesia and Philippines, is home Indonesia to about 4,350 marine fish species and is among the world's most emblematic re- 2Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, UMR 226 ISEM (UM- gions in terms of conservation. Threatened by overfishing and oceans warming, the CNRS-IRD-EPHE), Montpellier, France CT fisheries have faced drastic declines over the last decades. Usually monitored 3Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions-und Biodiversitätsforschung through a biomass-based approach, fisheries trends have rarely been characterized an der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, at the species level due to the high number of taxa involved and the difficulty to Berlin, Germany accurately and routinely identify individuals to the species level. Biomass, however, 4Division of Zoology, Research Center for Biology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences is a poor proxy of species richness, and automated methods of species identifica- (LIPI), Cibinong, Indonesia tion are required to move beyond biomass-based approaches. Recent meta-analyses 5UMR 7208 BOREA (MNHN-CNRS-UPMC- have demonstrated that species richness peaks at intermediary levels of biomass. IRD-UCBN), Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France Consequently, preserving biomass is not equal to preserving biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Energetic Costs of Chronic Fish Predation on Reef-Building Corals
    ResearchOnline@JCU This file is part of the following reference: Cole, Andrew (2011) Energetic costs of chronic fish predation on reef-building corals. PhD thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is available from: http://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/37611/ The author has certified to JCU that they have made a reasonable effort to gain permission and acknowledge the owner of any third party copyright material included in this document. If you believe that this is not the case, please contact ResearchOnline@jcu.edu.au and quote http://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/37611/ The energetic costs of chronic fish predation on reef-building corals Thesis submitted by Andrew Cole BSc (Hons) September 2011 For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Marine Biology ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies and the School of Marine and Tropical Biology James Cook University Townsville, Queensland, Australia Statement of Access I, the undersigned, the author of this thesis, understand that James Cook University will make it available for use within the University Library and via the Australian Digital Thesis Network for use elsewhere. I understand that as an unpublished work this thesis has significant protection under the Copyright Act and I do not wish to put any further restrictions upon access to this thesis. 09/09/2011 (signature) (Date) ii Statement of Sources Declaration I declare that this thesis is my own work and has not been submitted in any form for another degree or diploma at my university or other institution of tertiary education. Information derived from the published or unpublished work of others has been acknowledged in the text and a list of references is given.
    [Show full text]
  • Reef Fishes of the Bird's Head Peninsula, West
    Check List 5(3): 587–628, 2009. ISSN: 1809-127X LISTS OF SPECIES Reef fishes of the Bird’s Head Peninsula, West Papua, Indonesia Gerald R. Allen 1 Mark V. Erdmann 2 1 Department of Aquatic Zoology, Western Australian Museum. Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Perth, Western Australia 6986. E-mail: tropical_reef@bigpond.com 2 Conservation International Indonesia Marine Program. Jl. Dr. Muwardi No. 17, Renon, Denpasar 80235 Indonesia. Abstract A checklist of shallow (to 60 m depth) reef fishes is provided for the Bird’s Head Peninsula region of West Papua, Indonesia. The area, which occupies the extreme western end of New Guinea, contains the world’s most diverse assemblage of coral reef fishes. The current checklist, which includes both historical records and recent survey results, includes 1,511 species in 451 genera and 111 families. Respective species totals for the three main coral reef areas – Raja Ampat Islands, Fakfak-Kaimana coast, and Cenderawasih Bay – are 1320, 995, and 877. In addition to its extraordinary species diversity, the region exhibits a remarkable level of endemism considering its relatively small area. A total of 26 species in 14 families are currently considered to be confined to the region. Introduction and finally a complex geologic past highlighted The region consisting of eastern Indonesia, East by shifting island arcs, oceanic plate collisions, Timor, Sabah, Philippines, Papua New Guinea, and widely fluctuating sea levels (Polhemus and the Solomon Islands is the global centre of 2007). reef fish diversity (Allen 2008). Approximately 2,460 species or 60 percent of the entire reef fish The Bird’s Head Peninsula and surrounding fauna of the Indo-West Pacific inhabits this waters has attracted the attention of naturalists and region, which is commonly referred to as the scientists ever since it was first visited by Coral Triangle (CT).
    [Show full text]
  • Orientation of Pelagic Larvae of Coral-Reef Fishes in the Ocean
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 252: 239–253, 2003 Published April 30 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Orientation of pelagic larvae of coral-reef fishes in the ocean Jeffrey M. Leis*, Brooke M. Carson-Ewart Ichthyology, and Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Research, Australian Museum, 6 College St, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia ABSTRACT: During the day, we used settlement-stage reef-fish larvae from light-traps to study in situ orientation, 100 to 1000 m from coral reefs in water 10 to 40 m deep, at Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef. Seven species were observed off leeward Lizard Island, and 4 species off the windward side. All but 1 species swam faster than average ambient currents. Depending on area, time, and spe- cies, 80 to 100% of larvae swam directionally. Two species of butterflyfishes Chaetodon plebeius and Chaetodon aureofasciatus swam away from the island, indicating that they could detect the island’s reefs. Swimming of 4 species of damselfishes Chromis atripectoralis, Chrysiptera rollandi, Neo- pomacentrus cyanomos and Pomacentrus lepidogenys ranged from highly directional to non- directional. Only in N. cyanomos did swimming direction differ between windward and leeward areas. Three species (C. atripectoralis, N. cyanomos and P. lepidogenys) were observed in morning and late afternoon at the leeward area, and all swam in a more westerly direction in the late after- noon. In the afternoon, C. atripectoralis larvae were highly directional in sunny conditions, but non- directional and individually more variable in cloudy conditions. All these observations imply that damselfish larvae utilized a solar compass. Caesio cuning and P.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Functional Groups of Herbivorous Reef Fishes As Indicators of Coral Reef Resilience a Practical Guide for Coral Reef Managers in the Asia Pacifi C Region
    Monitoring Functional Groups of Herbivorous Reef Fishes as Indicators of Coral Reef Resilience A practical guide for coral reef managers in the Asia Pacifi c Region Alison L. Green and David R. Bellwood IUCN RESILIENCE SCIENCE GROUP WORKING PAPER SERIES - NO 7 IUCN Global Marine Programme Founded in 1958, IUCN (the International Union for the Conservation of Nature) brings together states, government agencies and a diverse range of non-governmental organizations in a unique world partnership: over 100 members in all, spread across some 140 countries. As a Union, IUCN seeks to influence, encourage and assist societies throughout the world to conserve the integrity and diversity of nature and to ensure that any use of natural resources is equitable and ecologically sustainable. The IUCN Global Marine Programme provides vital linkages for the Union and its members to all the IUCN activities that deal with marine issues, including projects and initiatives of the Regional offices and the six IUCN Commissions. The IUCN Global Marine Programme works on issues such as integrated coastal and marine management, fisheries, marine protected areas, large marine ecosystems, coral reefs, marine invasives and protection of high and deep seas. The Nature Conservancy The mission of The Nature Conservancy is to preserve the plants, animals and natural communities that represent the diversity of life on Earth by protecting the lands and waters they need to survive. The Conservancy launched the Global Marine Initiative in 2002 to protect and restore the most resilient examples of ocean and coastal ecosystems in ways that benefit marine life, local communities and economies.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological Variations in the Scleral Ossicles of 172 Families Of
    Zoological Studies 51(8): 1490-1506 (2012) Morphological Variations in the Scleral Ossicles of 172 Families of Actinopterygian Fishes with Notes on their Phylogenetic Implications Hin-kui Mok1 and Shu-Hui Liu2,* 1Institute of Marine Biology and Asia-Pacific Ocean Research Center, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 804, Taiwan 2Institute of Oceanography, National Taiwan University, 1 Roosevelt Road, Sec. 4, Taipei 106, Taiwan (Accepted August 15, 2012) Hin-kui Mok and Shu-Hui Liu (2012) Morphological variations in the scleral ossicles of 172 families of actinopterygian fishes with notes on their phylogenetic implications. Zoological Studies 51(8): 1490-1506. This study reports on (1) variations in the number and position of scleral ossicles in 283 actinopterygian species representing 172 families, (2) the distribution of the morphological variants of these bony elements, (3) the phylogenetic significance of these variations, and (4) a phylogenetic hypothesis relevant to the position of the Callionymoidei, Dactylopteridae, and Syngnathoidei based on these osteological variations. The results suggest that the Callionymoidei (not including the Gobiesocidae), Dactylopteridae, and Syngnathoidei are closely related. This conclusion was based on the apomorphic character state of having only the anterior scleral ossicle. Having only the anterior scleral ossicle should have evolved independently in the Syngnathioidei + Dactylopteridae + Callionymoidei, Gobioidei + Apogonidae, and Pleuronectiformes among the actinopterygians studied in this paper. http://zoolstud.sinica.edu.tw/Journals/51.8/1490.pdf Key words: Scleral ossicle, Actinopterygii, Phylogeny. Scleral ossicles of the teleostome fish eye scleral ossicles and scleral cartilage have received comprise a ring of cartilage supporting the eye little attention. It was not until a recent paper by internally (i.e., the sclerotic ring; Moy-Thomas Franz-Odendaal and Hall (2006) that the homology and Miles 1971).
    [Show full text]
  • Further Additions to the Fish Faunas of Lord Howe and Norfolk Islands, Southwest Pacific Ocean1
    Pacific Science (1993), vol. 47, no. 2: 118-135 © 1993 by University of Hawaii Press. All rights reserved Further Additions to the Fish Faunas of Lord Howe and Norfolk Islands, Southwest Pacific Ocean1 3 MALCOLM P. FRANCIS2 AND JOHN E. RANDALL ABSTRACT: New fish records are reported from subtropical Lord Howe Island (34 species) and Norfolk Island (35 species). Most of the new records are based on few individuals ofwidespread tropical species. The new records increase the known coastalfish faunas to 433 species at Lord Howe Island and 254 at Norfolk Island. LORD HOWE ISLAND (31S S, 159 0 E) and (1993) provided a detailed discussion of the Norfolk Island (29 0 S, 168 0 E) are situated in hydrology of the Southwest Pacific. the subtropical Southwest Pacific Ocean (see Checklists of fishes from Lord Howe and Francis 1991, fig. I). Both islands are steep Norfolk islands have been published (Allen et and volcanic. A coral reef 6 km long fringes al. 1976, Hermes 1986), but there have been about 25% ofthe western side of Lord Howe significant recent additions to both faunas Island, protecting a shallow lagoon. Small (Francis 1991). Expeditions to both islands in patch and fringing reefs are present in some 1988-1992 made it obvious that the faunas other shallow sheltered sites, but much of the are still incompletely known. In this paper we rest of the coastline is rocky. Hermatypic report further additions to the fish faunas to corals are common, and 70 species have been provide a basis for their inclusion in a check­ recorded (Veron and Done 1979, Francis list of the fishes of Lord Howe, Norfolk, and 1993; J.
    [Show full text]
  • Larval Dispersal and Movement Patterns of Coral Reef Fishes, and Implications for Marine Reserve Network Design Alison L
    Larval dispersal and movement patterns of coral reef fishes, and implications for marine reserve network design Alison L. Green, Aileen P. Maypa, Glenn R. Almany, Kevin L. Rhodes, Rebecca Weeks, Rene A. Abesamis, Mary G. Gleason, Peter J. Mumby, Alan T. White To cite this version: Alison L. Green, Aileen P. Maypa, Glenn R. Almany, Kevin L. Rhodes, Rebecca Weeks, et al.. Larval dispersal and movement patterns of coral reef fishes, and implications for marine reserve network design. Biological Reviews, Wiley, 2015, 90 (4), pp.1215-1247. 10.1111/brv.12155. hal-01334353 HAL Id: hal-01334353 https://hal-univ-perp.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01334353 Submitted on 20 Jun 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives| 4.0 International License Biol. Rev. (2015), 90, pp. 1215–1247. 1215 doi: 10.1111/brv.12155 Larval dispersal and movement patterns of coral reef fishes, and implications for marine reserve network design Alison L. Green1,5,∗, Aileen P. Maypa2, Glenn R. Almany3,5, Kevin L. Rhodes4, Rebecca Weeks5, Rene A. Abesamis6, Mary G. Gleason7, Peter J. Mumby8 and Alan T.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts Part 1
    375 Poster Session I, Event Center – The Snowbird Center, Friday 26 July 2019 Maria Sabando1, Yannis Papastamatiou1, Guillaume Rieucau2, Darcy Bradley3, Jennifer Caselle3 1Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA, 2Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium, Chauvin, LA, USA, 3University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA Reef Shark Behavioral Interactions are Habitat Specific Dominance hierarchies and competitive behaviors have been studied in several species of animals that includes mammals, birds, amphibians, and fish. Competition and distribution model predictions vary based on dominance hierarchies, but most assume differences in dominance are constant across habitats. More recent evidence suggests dominance and competitive advantages may vary based on habitat. We quantified dominance interactions between two species of sharks Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos and Carcharhinus melanopterus, across two different habitats, fore reef and back reef, at a remote Pacific atoll. We used Baited Remote Underwater Video (BRUV) to observe dominance behaviors and quantified the number of aggressive interactions or bites to the BRUVs from either species, both separately and in the presence of one another. Blacktip reef sharks were the most abundant species in either habitat, and there was significant negative correlation between their relative abundance, bites on BRUVs, and the number of grey reef sharks. Although this trend was found in both habitats, the decline in blacktip abundance with grey reef shark presence was far more pronounced in fore reef habitats. We show that the presence of one shark species may limit the feeding opportunities of another, but the extent of this relationship is habitat specific. Future competition models should consider habitat-specific dominance or competitive interactions.
    [Show full text]