Permanent Magnet Guidelines

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Permanent Magnet Guidelines MMPA PMG-88 PERMANENT MAGNET GUIDELINES I. Basic physics of permanent magnet materials II. Design relationships, figures of merit and optimizing techniques III. Measuring IV. Magnetizing V. Stabilizing and handling VI. Specifications, standards and communications VII. Bibliography MAGNETIC MATERIALS PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION 8 SOUTH MICHIGAN AVENUE • SUITE 1000 • CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60603 INTRODUCTION This guide is a supplement to our MMPA Standard No. 0100. It relates the information in the Standard to permanent magnet circuit problems. The guide is a bridge between unit property data and a permanent magnet component having a specific size and geometry in order to establish a magnetic field in a given magnetic circuit environment. The MMPA 0100 defines magnetic, thermal, physical and mechanical properties. The properties given are descriptive in nature and not intended as a basis of acceptance or rejection. Magnetic measure- ments are difficult to make and less accurate than corresponding electrical mea- surements. A considerable amount of detailed information must be exchanged between producer and user if magnetic quantities are to be compared at two locations. MMPA member companies feel that this publication will be helpful in allowing both user and producer to arrive at a realistic and meaningful specifica- tion framework. Acknowledgment The Magnetic Materials Producers Association acknowledges the out- standing contribution of Rollin J. Parker to this industry and designers and manufacturers of products usingpermanent magnet materials. Mr Parker the Technical Consultant to MMPA compiled and wrote this document. We also wish to thank the Standards and Engineering Com- mittee of MMPA which reviewed and edited this document. December 1987 3M July 1988 5M August 1996 1M December 1998 1 M CONTENTS The guide is divided into the following sections: Glossary of terms and conversion tables- A very important starting point since the whole basis of communication in the magnetic material industry involves measurement of defined unit properties. .l I. Basic physics of permanent magnet materials- An overview of the physics of permanent magnetism is felt to be an important part of learning about permanent magnets. .4 II. Design relationships, figures of merit and optimizing techniques- Relationships are developed that allow materials to be compared. The figures of merit are a guide to the best choice of unit properties for effectively using the energy conversion process in electromagnetic devices and systems. .7 III. Measuring . ...12 IV. Magnetizing . ~ , . .18 V. Stabilizing and handling. .22 VI. Specifications, standards and communications . .25 VII. Bibliography . .28 The sections on measuring, magnetizing and stabilizing contain the basic considerations that allow the user to choose the techniques most suitable for a specific permanent magnet component and operating environment. GLOSSARY OF TERMS As Area of the air gap, or the cross sectional area of the where: Bi = intrinsic induction in gauss; B = magnetic an gap perpendicular to the flux path, is the average induction in gauss; H = field strength in oersteds. cross sectional area of that portion of the air gap within which the application interaction occurs. Area is mea- B, Recoil induction, is the magnetic induction that sured in sq. cm. in a plane normal to the central flux line remains in a magnetic material after magnetizing and of the air gap. conditioning for final use; measured in gauss. A,,, Area of the magnet, is the cross sectional area of B, Magnetic induction, at the point of the maximum the magnet perpendicular to the central flux line, mea- enerajr product (BH),,,,; measured in gauss. sured in sq. cm. at any point along its length. In design, A,,, is usually considered the area at the neutral section of the magnet. B, Residual induction (or flux density), is the magnetic induction corresponding to zero magnetizing force in a B Magnetic induction, is the magnetic field induced by magnetic material after saturation in a closed circuit; a field strength, H, at a given point. It is the vector sum, measured in gauss. at each point within the substance, of the magnetic field strength and resultant intrinsic induction. Magnetic in- f Reluctance factor, accounts for the apparent mag- duction is the flux per unit area normal to the direction netic circuit reluctance. This factor is required due to of the magnetic path. the treatment of H, and H, as constants. B, Remanent induction, is any magnetic induction F Leakage factor, accounts for flux leakage from the that remains in a magnetic material after removal of an magnetic circuit. It is the ratio between the magnetic applied saturating magnetic field, H,. (Bd is the mag- flux at the magnet neutral section and the average flux netic induction at any point on the demagnetization present in the air gap. F = (B, A,,)/(B, Ag). curve: measured in gauss.) B,/H, Slope of the operating line, is the ratio of the F Magnetomotive force, (magnetic potential differ- remanent induction, Bd, to a demagnetizing force, H,. ence), is the line integral of the field strength, H, be- It is also referred to as the permeance coefficient, shear tween any two points, p1 and pz. line, load line and unit permeance. B,H, Energy product, indicates the energy that a mag- I;=;‘Hdl netic material can supply to an external magnetic circuit Pl when operating at any point on its demagnetization curve; measured in megagauss-oersteds. F = magnetomotive force in gilberts H = field strength in oersteds vw?lax Maximum energy product, is the maximum dl = an element of length between the two points, in product of (BtlHtt) which can be obtained on the demag- centimeters. netization curve. H Magnetic field strength, (magnetizing or demagne- Bi, (or J) Saturation intrinsic induction, is the maxi- tizing force), is the measure of the vector magnetic mum intrinsic induction possible in a material. quantity that determines the ability of an electric cur- rent, or a magnetic body, to induce a magnetic field at a B, Magnetic induction in the air gap, is the average given point; measured in oersteds. value of magnetic induction over the area of the air gap, A,; or it is the magnetic induction measured at a spe- cific point within the air gap; measured in gauss. H, Coercive force of a material, is equal to the demag- netizing force required to reduce residual induction, B,, Bi (or J) Intrinsic induction, is the contribution of the to zero in a magnetic field after magnetizing to satura- magnetic material to the total magnetic induction, B. It tion; measured in oersteds. is the vector difference between the magnetic induction in the material and the magnetic induction that would H,i Intrinsic coercive force of a material indicates its exist in a vacuum under the same field strength, H. This resistance to demagnetization. It is equal to the demag- relation is expressed by the equation: netizing force which reduces the intrinsic induction, Bit in the material to zero after magnetizing to saturation; Bi=B-H measured in oersteds. 1 H, is that value of H corresponding to the remanent pre recoil permeability, is the average slope of the re- induction, Bd; on the demagnetization curve, measured coil hysteresis loop. Also known as a minor loop. in oersteds. 4 magnetic flux, is a contrived but measurable concept H, is that value of H corresponding to the recoil induc- that has evolved in an attempt to describe the “flow” of a tion, B,; measured in oersteds. magnetic field. Mathematically, it is the surface integral of the normal component of the magnetic induction, B, H, is the magnetic field strength at the point of the over an area. A. maximum energy product (BH)maX; measured in oersteds. +=ijB*dA where: H, Net effective magnetizing force, is the magnetiz- C$ = magnetic flux, in maxwells ing force required in the material, to magnetize to satu- B = magnetic induction, in gauss ration measured in oersteds. dA = an element of area, in sauare centimeters When the magnetic induction, B, is uniformly distrib- J, see Bi Intrinsic induction. uted and is normal to the area, A, the flux, 4 = BA. J, see Bi, Saturation intrinsic induction. A closed circuit condition exists when the external Es Length of the air gap, is the length of the path of the flux path of a permanent magnet is confined with high central flux line of the air gap; measured in centimeters. permeability material. U,,., Length of the magnet, is the total length of magnet The demagnetization curve is the second (or fourth) material traversed in one complete revolution of the quadrant of a major hysteresis loop. Points on this curve center-line of the magnetic circuit; measured in centi- are designated by the coordinates Bd and Hd. meters. A fluxmeter is an instrument that measures the change P,.,,ID Dimension ratio, is the ratio of the length of a of flux linkage with a search coil. magnet to its diameter, or the diameter of a circle of equivalent cross-sectional area. For simple geometries, The gauss is the unit of magnetic induction, B, in the such as bars and rods, the dimension ratio is related to cgs electromagnetic system. One gauss is equal to one the slope of the operating line of the magnet, BdH,. maxwell per square centimeter. P Permeance, is the reciprocal of the reluctance, R, A gaussmeter is an instrument that measures the in- measured in maxwells per gilbert. stantaneous value of magnetic induction, B. Its prin- ciple of operation is usually based on one of the follow- R Reluctance, is somewhat analogous to electrical re- ing: the Hall-effect, nuclear magnetic resonance sistance. It is the quantity that determines the magnetic (NMR), or the rotating coil principle. flux, 4, resulting from a given magnetomotive force, F. The gilbert is the unit of magnetomotive force, F, in the R = F/qb cgs electromagnetic system.
Recommended publications
  • Analysis of Magnetic Field and Electromagnetic Performance of a New Hybrid Excitation Synchronous Motor with Dual-V Type Magnets
    energies Article Analysis of Magnetic Field and Electromagnetic Performance of a New Hybrid Excitation Synchronous Motor with dual-V type Magnets Wenjing Hu, Xueyi Zhang *, Hongbin Yin, Huihui Geng, Yufeng Zhang and Liwei Shi School of Transportation and Vehicle Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255049, China; [email protected] (W.H.); [email protected] (H.Y.); [email protected] (H.G.); [email protected] (Y.Z.); [email protected] (L.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-137-089-41973 Received: 15 February 2020; Accepted: 17 March 2020; Published: 22 March 2020 Abstract: Due to the increasing energy crisis and environmental pollution, the development of drive motors for new energy vehicles (NEVs) has become the focus of popular attention. To improve the sine of the air-gap flux density and flux regulation capacity of drive motors, a new hybrid excitation synchronous motor (HESM) has been proposed. The HESM adopts a salient pole rotor with built-in dual-V permanent magnets (PMs), non-arc pole shoes and excitation windings. The fundamental topology, operating principle and analytical model for a magnetic field are presented. In the analytical model, the rotor magnetomotive force (MMF) is derived based on the minimum reluctance principle, and the permeance function considering a non-uniform air-gap is calculated using the magnetic equivalent circuit (MEC) method. Besides, the electromagnetic performance including the air-gap magnetic field and flux regulation capacity is analyzed by the finite element method (FEM). The simulation results of the air-gap magnetic field are consistent with the analytical results. The experiment and simulation results of the performance show that the flux waveform is sinusoidal-shaped and the air-gap flux can be adjusted effectively by changing the excitation current.
    [Show full text]
  • Transient Simulation of Magnetic Circuits Using the Permeance-Capacitance Analogy
    Transient Simulation of Magnetic Circuits Using the Permeance-Capacitance Analogy Jost Allmeling Wolfgang Hammer John Schonberger¨ Plexim GmbH Plexim GmbH TridonicAtco Schweiz AG Technoparkstrasse 1 Technoparkstrasse 1 Obere Allmeind 2 8005 Zurich, Switzerland 8005 Zurich, Switzerland 8755 Ennenda, Switzerland Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Abstract—When modeling magnetic components, the R1 Lσ1 Lσ2 R2 permeance-capacitance analogy avoids the drawbacks of traditional equivalent circuits models. The magnetic circuit structure is easily derived from the core geometry, and the Ideal Transformer Lm Rfe energy relationship between electrical and magnetic domain N1:N2 is preserved. Non-linear core materials can be modeled with variable permeances, enabling the implementation of arbitrary saturation and hysteresis functions. Frequency-dependent losses can be realized with resistors in the magnetic circuit. Fig. 1. Transformer implementation with coupled inductors The magnetic domain has been implemented in the simulation software PLECS. To avoid numerical integration errors, Kirch- hoff’s current law must be applied to both the magnetic flux and circuit, in which inductances represent magnetic flux paths the flux-rate when solving the circuit equations. and losses incur at resistors. Magnetic coupling between I. INTRODUCTION windings is realized either with mutual inductances or with ideal transformers. Inductors and transformers are key components in modern power electronic circuits. Compared to other passive com- Using coupled inductors, magnetic components can be ponents they are difficult to model due to the non-linear implemented in any circuit simulator since only electrical behavior of magnetic core materials and the complex structure components are required.
    [Show full text]
  • 6.685 Electric Machines, Course Notes 2: Magnetic Circuit Basics
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.685 Electric Machines Class Notes 2 Magnetic Circuit Basics c 2003 James L. Kirtley Jr. 1 Introduction Magnetic Circuits offer, as do electric circuits, a way of simplifying the analysis of magnetic field systems which can be represented as having a collection of discrete elements. In electric circuits the elements are sources, resistors and so forth which are represented as having discrete currents and voltages. These elements are connected together with ‘wires’ and their behavior is described by network constraints (Kirkhoff’s voltage and current laws) and by constitutive relationships such as Ohm’s Law. In magnetic circuits the lumped parameters are called ‘Reluctances’ (the inverse of ‘Reluctance’ is called ‘Permeance’). The analog to a ‘wire’ is referred to as a high permeance magnetic circuit element. Of course high permeability is the analog of high conductivity. By organizing magnetic field systems into lumped parameter elements and using network con- straints and constitutive relationships we can simplify the analysis of such systems. 2 Electric Circuits First, let us review how Electric Circuits are defined. We start with two conservation laws: conser- vation of charge and Faraday’s Law. From these we can, with appropriate simplifying assumptions, derive the two fundamental circiut constraints embodied in Kirkhoff’s laws. 2.1 KCL Conservation of charge could be written in integral form as: dρ J~ · ~nda + f dv = 0 (1) ZZ Zvolume dt This simply states that the sum of current out of some volume of space and rate of change of free charge in that space must be zero.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Harvesting Using AC Machines with High Effective Pole Count,” Power Electronics Specialists Conference, P 2229-34, 2008
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Department of Electrical Engineering ENERGY HARVESTING USING AC MACHINES WITH HIGH EFFECTIVE POLE COUNT A Dissertation in Electrical Engineering by Richard Theodore Geiger 2010 Richard Theodore Geiger Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2010 ii The dissertation of Richard Theodore Geiger was reviewed and approved* by the following: Heath Hofmann Associate Professor, Electrical Engineering Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee George A. Lesieutre Professor and Head, Aerospace Engineering Mary Frecker Professor, Mechanical & Nuclear Engineering John Mitchell Professor, Electrical Engineering Jim Breakall Professor, Electrical Engineering W. Kenneth Jenkins Professor, Electrical Engineering Head of the Department of Electrical Engineering *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT In this thesis, ways to improve the power conversion of rotating generators at low rotor speeds in energy harvesting applications were investigated. One method is to increase the pole count, which increases the generator back-emf without also increasing the I2R losses, thereby increasing both torque density and conversion efficiency. One machine topology that has a high effective pole count is a hybrid “stepper” machine. However, the large self inductance of these machines decreases their power factor and hence the maximum power that can be delivered to a load. This effect can be cancelled by the addition of capacitors in series with the stepper windings. A circuit was designed and implemented to automatically vary the series capacitance over the entire speed range investigated. The addition of the series capacitors improved the power output of the stepper machine by up to 700%.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Analysis of Continuously Variable Series Reactor Using G-C Framework
    1 Comprehensive Analysis of Continuously Variable Series Reactor Using G-C Framework Mohammadali Hayerikhiyavi, Aleksandar Dimitrovski, Senior Member, IEEE electronics-based converter in an H-bridge composed of four Abstract-- Continuously Variable Series Reactor (CVSR) has the IGBTs (Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistors) was described. ability to regulate the reactance of an ac circuit using the magnetizing characteristic of its ferromagnetic core, shared by an ac and a dc The paper is organized as follows: the basic concept of winding to control power flow, damp oscillations and limit fault CVSR is briefly reviewed in Section II; the gyrator-capacitor currents. In order to understand and utilize a CVSR in the power grid, (G-C) approach is explained in Section III; Section IV describes it is essential to know all of its operational characteristics. The gyrator- the simulation framework; Section V presents results from the capacitor approach has been applied to model electromagnetic coupling between the two circuits, controlled ac circuit and control dc simulations of normal operation and fault conditions to analyze circuit of the device. In this paper, we investigate some of the CVSR the impacts on the CVSR in terms of induced voltage and power side behavior in terms of the induced voltage across the dc winding, transferred into the dc windings; and conclusions are flux density within the core’s branches, and the power exchange summarized in Section VI. between the two circuits during normal operation and fault conditions. II. CONTINUOUSLY VARIABLE SERIES REACTOR (CVSR) Index Terms— Continuously Variable Series Reactor (CVSR), magnetic amplifier, saturable-core reactor, Gyrator-Capacitor In the saturable core reactor shown in Figure 1, an ac model.
    [Show full text]
  • Gyrator Capacitor Modeling Approach to Study the Impact of Geomagnetically Induced Current on Single-Phase Core Transformer
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-2017 Gyrator Capacitor Modeling Approach to Study the Impact of Geomagnetically Induced Current on Single-Phase Core Transformer Parul Kaushal University of Tennessee, Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Recommended Citation Kaushal, Parul, "Gyrator Capacitor Modeling Approach to Study the Impact of Geomagnetically Induced Current on Single-Phase Core Transformer. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2017. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/4752 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Parul Kaushal entitled "Gyrator Capacitor Modeling Approach to Study the Impact of Geomagnetically Induced Current on Single-Phase Core Transformer." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Electrical Engineering. Syed Kamrul Islam, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Yilu Liu, Benjamin J. Blalock Accepted for the Council: Dixie L. Thompson Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) Gyrator-Capacitor Modeling Approach to Study the Impact of Geomagnetically Induced Current on Single-Phase Core Transformer A Thesis Presented for the Master of Science Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Parul Kaushal May 2017 Copyright © 2017 by Parul Kaushal All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Gap Elimination in Permanent Magnet Machines
    AIR GAP ELIMINATION IN PERMANENT MAGNET MACHINES By Andy Judge A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy In Mechanical Engineering by _________________________________________________________ March 2012 APPROVED: _________________________________________________________ Dr. James D. Van de Ven, Advisor _________________________________________________________ Dr. Cosme Furlong-Vazquez, Committee Member _________________________________________________________ Dr. Alexander E. Emanuel, Committee Member _________________________________________________________ Dr. Eben C. Cobb, Committee Member _________________________________________________________ Dr. David J. Olinger, Graduate Committee Representative ABSTRACT In traditional Permanent Magnet Machines, such as electric motors and generators, power is transmitted by magnetic flux passing through an air gap, which has a very low magnetic permeability, limiting performance. However, reducing the air gap through traditional means carries risks in manufacturing, with tight tolerances and associated costs, and reliability, with thermal and dynamic effects requiring adequate clearance. Using a magnetically permeable, high dielectric strength material has the potential to improve magnetic performance, while at the same time offering performance advantages in heat transfer. Ferrofluids were studied as a method for improved permeability in the rotor / stator gap with a combined
    [Show full text]
  • Co Simulation of Electric and Magnetic Circuits
    Session 3632 Co-simulation of Electric and Magnetic Circuits James H. Spreen Indiana Institute of Technology, Ft. Wayne, IN Abstract: This paper reviews magnetic circuit models of magnetic structures, developed as analogs of electric resistor networks. It demonstrates magnetic simulation by circuit simulation of a magnetic circuit representing a three-winding magnetic structure, using known winding currents to calculate magnetic fluxes. Simultaneous simulation of both a magnetic circuit representing a magnetic structure and electric circuits connected to the windings eliminates the need to specify winding currents as known independent sources. This technique is here termed "co-simulation" for brevity. The controlled sources and auxiliary circuits necessary to implement co-simulation are arranged with winding turns as factors in controlled sources, to allow easy adaptation for different windings. Co-simulation is illustrated using the same three- winding structure used in the magnetic simulation, with a pulse input to one winding and a resistive load on the other two windings. The results of this co-simulation are compared to an electric circuit simulation in which the magnetic structure is described with three self inductances and three coupling coefficients. Extensions of co-simulation to account for nonlinear magnetic core behavior and core loss are described. I. Introduction A convenient point of introduction of magnetic circuit analysis is to note an analogy1,2 which can be established between magnetic and electric quantities. Specifically, magnetic potential or magnetomotive force ℑ (mmf) is represented by electric potential v or electromotive force (emf), magnetic flux φ is represented by electric current i, and magnetic reluctance ℜ is represented by electrical resistance R.
    [Show full text]
  • International System of Electric and Magnetic Units
    .. INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM OF ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC UNITS By J. H. Dellinger CONTENTS Page I. Introduction 599 II. The international system 600 1 Simplicity of this system 604 2 Subordination of the magnetic pole. 605 3 Limitation to electromagnetism 605 III. The magnetic quantities 606 1 The magnetic circuit 607 2 Induction and magnetizing force 608 IV. Rationalization of the units 613 1. The Heaviside system 613 2 Other attempts to eliminate 47r 616 3. The two sets of magnetic units 621 4. The ampere-turn units 623 V. Summary 628 Appendix.—Symbols used 631 I. INTRODUCTION Electric units and standards are now very nearly uniform in all parts of the world. As a result of the decisions of international congresses and the cooperation of the national standardizing laboratories, the international ohm and ampere are accepted every- where as the basis of electrical measurements. A complete system of electric and magnetic imits is in general use, built upon these fundamental units. There have been proposals to change the units from time to time, and as a result there is some diversity of usage in respect to units in current electric and magnetic literature. For instance, Heaviside iinits are used in certain recent books on theoretical electricity ; a slight change of electric units is advocated by M. Abraham; and quite a number of different magnetic units are used in presenting the results of magnetic experiments. It appears worth while to examine critically the system of imits which is generally used, to study the reasons which are advanced 599 6oo Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards [Voi.
    [Show full text]
  • Power-Invariant Magnetic System Modeling
    González and Ehsani. Int J Magnetics Electromagnetism 2018, 4:012 International Journal of Magnetics and VIBGYOR Electromagnetism ISSN: 2631-5068 Power-Invariant Magnetic System Modeling Research Article: Open Access Guadalupe G González* and Mehrdad Ehsani Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, USA Abstract In this paper, we present an alternative to modeling magnetic systems using a more consistent approach to lumped parameters. The model we introduce is consistent with other energy system models and allows the engineer to draw analogies from other energy systems to gather insights and a clearer understanding of magnetic systems which up to now has not been available. First, the justification for our new approach and a literature review of other models based on lumped parameters is presented in order to highlight the differences between those and our model. Then, the fundamentals of electromagnetism and magnetic materials that are the underpinnings of the proposed magnetic model are presented. Finally, theoretical verifications are performed in a case study system for magnetic network identification to validate our model. Keywords Electromagnetic modeling, Magnetic analysis, Magnetic circuits, Magnetic hysteresis, Magnetic losses Introduction It is noted that the conventional magnetic model does not follow the same pattern as the other media. First, the In all energy systems the parameters necessary to generalized power equation is not satisfied, second, three transmit power are similar in functionality, an effort of the six quantities that standardize the models have not or force (χ) is needed to create a flow in a medium and being defined and finally, there is a well-known reluc- a flow or rate of change results (γ).
    [Show full text]
  • Electromagnetic Modeling of a Linear Synchronous Machine by Lumped Approach
    MATEC Web of Conferences 22, 0200 8 (2015) DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/2015220200 8 C Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2015 Electromagnetic Modeling of a Linear Synchronous Machine by Lumped Approach Yang Cui & Wei Xie College of Logistics Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China ABSTRACT: This paper presents a quantitative analysis method for electromagnetic device called lumped approach. This approach is based on combination of magnetic circuits and finite element method, which provides a good compromise between time calculation and accuracy. The authors propose an electromagnetic model for a linear synchronous machine through this lumped approach. In this research, the linear machine is separated into many small parts. Then, compute all the magnetic reluctances of them with analytical method and acquire the reluctance network. After that the authors couple the electrical part and magnetic part through electromagnetic coupling method. At last, the authors simulate the electromagnetic model of the linear machine and compare the result with that of finite element method. Keywords: electromagnetic device; lumped approach; linear synchronous machine; electromagnetic coupling 1 INTRODUCTION netic coupling. Finally, the electromagnetic model is established [3] [4] [5]. Although the finite element method (FEM) is very In this paper, we introduce electromagnetic cou- accurate, it is not appropriate to all industrial obliga- pling and how to estimate the permeance with analyt- tions. In a design phase, it is necessary to take the ical method in the beginning. The main work is to quickness criteria into account. However, an intensive propose an electromagnetic model for a linear syn- exploration of the design space by the use of optimi- chronous machine by lumped approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Flux Density B × Cross-Sectional Area A)
    ELL 100 - Introduction to Electrical Engineering LECTURE 31: MAGNETIC CIRCUITS INTRODUCTION A magnetic circuit is made up of one or more closed loop paths containing a magnetic flux ϕ (= magnetic field/flux density B × cross-sectional area A). The flux is usually generated by permanent magnets or electromagnets and confined to a path by magnetic cores consisting of ferromagnetic materials like iron, although there may be air gaps or other materials in the path. Magnetic circuits are employed to efficiently channel magnetic fields in many devices such as electric motors, generators, transformers, relays, solenoids, loudspeakers, hard disks, MRI machines. 2 APPLICATIONS Motors Generators Transformers Circuit Relay Breakers Switches 3 APPLICATIONS Solenoids Hard Disks MRI Machines 4 Magnetomotive force (mmf) In an electric circuit, the current is induced due to the existence of an electromotive force (emf E, battery voltage). By analogy, we say that in a magnetic circuit the magnetic flux is induced due to the existence of a magnetomotive force (mmf F) caused by a current flowing through one or more turns of coil. The value of the mmf F is proportional to the current flowing through the coil and to the number of turns in the coil, and is expressed in units of “ampere-turns” or just amperes (number of turns is dimensionless). F = N.I 5 Magnetic field strength/intensity (H) The magnetomotive force per unit length of the magnetic circuit is termed the magnetic field strength/intensity (H). F H l where, F NI amperes where l is the length
    [Show full text]