DOCSLIB.ORG

Dutra-Year-In-Review-2018.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2018 dutragroup.com INDUSTRY LEADER IN AGGREGATES, DREDGING, AND MARINE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INSIDE 6 26 36 Port Authority: The Dutra Group The Dutra Group THIS Channeling Supports Student Recognized With A New Era Journeys With 2018 Safety Award ISSUE For Canaveral The Beavers by Dredging Contractors of America 2 DUTRA YEAR IN REVIEW 2018 FAMILY OWNED FOR FOUR GENERATIONS CAPACITY. CAPABILITY. CHARACTER. OUR MISSION OUR VISION OUR POSITIONING Dutra’s mission is to strengthen our Dutra’s vision is one of innovation, Dutra is about commitment. Our nation’s infrastructure and improve expanding beyond the plans on paper brand is a function of our leadership: our waterways through sustainable to include the communities that travel how we leverage the capacity of our dredging, marine construction, and our waterways. Shoulder to shoulder, business, the capability of our people, aggregate manufacturing. We are we support them by building more and the character of our company. committed to our employees and sustainable communities and by creating to the services we offer, providing new jobs that improve the social and the community with innovative, safety standard within our industry. economical, and environmentally responsible living solutions since 1904. See more: www.dutragroup.com/history.html 2018 DUTRA YEAR IN REVIEW 3 A MESSAGE FROM OUR CEO The past year was very successful on many fronts for Dutra, but what stands out most was our excellent safety record in 2018. This achievement is a tribute to the collaboration across the entire organization to uphold a safety-first culture for all. I look for your ongoing efforts to champion this ethic as we strive to make this company an even safer place to work. As we move into 2019, we are seeing trends that signal growth and demand for our expertise in the industry. Following the most recent election cycle, state leaders are committed to maintaining vital upgrades and seeking to repair decayed infrastructure throughout California. This focus on critical reinforcement means more work for all of us here in the state. Similarly, on a national level, the current administration is committed to improving our nation’s waterways, ports, harbors, and beaches. One of our most valued clients, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, is embarking on one of its largest capital expenditure projects in recent memory. While this enormous increase in funding will bring many opportunities, it will also require a new level of discipline and focus while executing work in our core business. Our company is currently in the process of upgrading and building new assets to meet these increased demands; we are also continuing to research the development of additional assets that will improve our productivity and performance in the future. Integrity is at the core of how we do business, both in service to our clients and within our operations. Through training and educating our future leaders, and consistently providing a high- quality product, our strength is rooted in our people and our values. The new CLIMB program for employee development has assisted in bolstering our future leadership at all levels, in all divisions and departments. With our focus on successorship combined with the talent and energy of our employees, I am very proud to say that we are continuing to build an organization that will succeed far into the future. Let us be proud and united in our efforts, and may 2019 be a prosperous and safe year for all of us. Best, Bill T. Dutra, President/Chief Executive Officer 4 DUTRA YEAR IN REVIEW 2018 A GLIMPSE AHEAD A MESSAGE FROM OUR COO — Here is a glimpse at some projects 2018 - Another Outstanding Year for The Dutra Group. Dutra has on the horizon for 2019 I am honored to report that this past year has, once again, brought great success and accomplishments to our company. These successes reach far beyond financial results, which were outstanding, but also to a variety of important and key elements that form the fabric of our US NAVAL STATION KINGS BAY organization. Florida / $32.8m / U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Jacksonville Operationally, all segments successfully executed our projects with exceptional results. Particularly noteworthy is the Delaware Deepening Project, where the combination of the Stuyvesant and the BOSTON HARBOR DEEPENING Paula Lee crews and management overcame severe weather and sea conditions, and unexpected Massachusetts / $122m / New soil conditions, to successfully complete a very challenging project. Also noteworthy are the England District combined efforts across segments, led by the Delta construction team, with its very successful completion of the Chevron Mallard Farms Project. The quarry team, Bay Area dredging team, and WOODWARD ISLAND BRIDGE the other construction teams also successfully brought home a variety of projects and important California / $16.5m / County of tasks. Of course, some of these accomplishments could not have been made without the San Joaquin outstanding contributions of our support teams, namely the equipment, fabrication, purchasing and safety departments. WOODWARD ISLAND Of course, none of these accomplishments could have occurred without the true commitment and LEVEE MAINTENANCE & support of our most valuable asset — our employees. Your commitment to our guiding principles REHABILITATION and core values, and your resiliency in overcoming our many challenges has further defined the California / $6.7m / Woodward great company that we are. Your character and capability will continue to position The Dutra Island Rec. Dist. 2072 Group for great future successes. CALCASIEU RIVER & PASS I am most proud of what may be our greatest success for 2018 - our exceptional performance in HOPPER RENTAL safety throughout the company. Safety is The Dutra Group’s number one core value. Our goal this Louisiana / $4.5m / U.S. Army year was to ensure that each and every employee considers safety to be the highest priority at all Corp of Engineers, New Orleans times. It is clear from our excellent safety record this year that this re-emphasis has indeed taken hold. Statistically, our collective efforts have resulted in a 19 percent reduction in our EMR and a JACKSONVILLE HARBOR 67 percent reduction in our OSHA Incident Rate. These results are truly outstanding. Our pursuit of excellence in safety is never-ending, your continued commitment to this core value will further DEEPENING propel our success in the future. Florida / $22.8m / U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Jacksonville I look forward to another exciting year in 2019, to our continued commitment to quality service to our nation’s water infrastructure, and to the continued safety for all our employees. SEAL BEACH MAINTENANCE DREDGING Best, California / $2.2m / U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Los Angeles Harry Stewart, Chief Operating Officer 2018 DUTRA YEAR IN REVIEW 5 DREDGING Strategically headquartered in the San Francisco Bay, Dutra Dredging performs environmentally-conscientious dredging for both the public and private sectors across the entire Pacific Coast region. As a leader in the industry with over 100 years in the dredging business, Dutra employs the latest technologies, operates under comprehensive regulatory oversight, and adheres to strict compliance reporting requirements. • Maintenance dredging and navigation improvements in ports, harbors, shipping channels, and inland waterways • One of the largest fleets on the Pacific Coast • Environmental habitat restoration • Contaminated sediment remediation • Infrastructure demolition • Submerged and upland slope protection • Underwater foundations and footings • Wetlands construction and reclamation With a staff of tenured engineers and deep experience across a breadth of projects, Dutra outpaces the competition by offering a broad range of cost-effective removal and disposal options including: • Split hull dump and hopper scow open water disposal • Re-handling of spoils to upland locations • Hydraulic sediment pump-off and placement • Dewatering & off-haul MARINE MATERIALS Dutra Materials is a key supplier of aggregate in Northern California. CONSTRUCTION With a waterside quarry strategically located in San Rafael, marine barge-loading equipment, and material distribution centers Established in 1972, Dutra Construction is scattered throughout the San Francisco Bay and Sacramento Delta, a full-service construction company that Dutra is the most cost-effective transporter of quality aggregate in provides skilled expertise in creating and the region. maintaining marine infrastructures in the west, from the Rocky Mountains to the The San Rafael Rock Quarry has been an active mine for over 100 Pacific Rim. years. A highly skilled staff of geologists, mining and civil engineers enables Dutra Materials to manufacture a wide variety of products, • Wharf and dock construction most of which are available for land or waterside distribution. • Marine rock & material placement • Marina construction • Rip rap • Pile driving & installation • Base rock • Environmental remediation of wetlands • Drain rock • Bridge & pier construction • Asphalt concrete • Demolition • Recycled aggregates • Levee construction, repair & • Fill material maintenance • Permeable material • Mooring systems • Outfalls and pipelines 6 DUTRA YEAR IN REVIEW 2018 FEATURED PROJECT PORT AUTHORITY: CHANNELING A NEW ERA FOR CANAVERAL 2018 DUTRA YEAR IN REVIEW 7 or those who have never cruised the Atlantic along Florida's central coast, Canaveral is F a name often associated with space infamy, a place world-renowned
Recommended publications
  • 0 5 10 15 20 Miles Μ and Statewide Resources Office

    0 5 10 15 20 Miles Μ and Statewide Resources Office

    Woodland RD Name RD Number Atlas Tract 2126 5 !"#$ Bacon Island 2028 !"#$80 Bethel Island BIMID Bishop Tract 2042 16 ·|}þ Bixler Tract 2121 Lovdal Boggs Tract 0404 ·|}þ113 District Sacramento River at I Street Bridge Bouldin Island 0756 80 Gaging Station )*+,- Brack Tract 2033 Bradford Island 2059 ·|}þ160 Brannan-Andrus BALMD Lovdal 50 Byron Tract 0800 Sacramento Weir District ¤£ r Cache Haas Area 2098 Y o l o ive Canal Ranch 2086 R Mather Can-Can/Greenhead 2139 Sacramento ican mer Air Force Chadbourne 2034 A Base Coney Island 2117 Port of Dead Horse Island 2111 Sacramento ¤£50 Davis !"#$80 Denverton Slough 2134 West Sacramento Drexler Tract Drexler Dutch Slough 2137 West Egbert Tract 0536 Winters Sacramento Ehrheardt Club 0813 Putah Creek ·|}þ160 ·|}þ16 Empire Tract 2029 ·|}þ84 Fabian Tract 0773 Sacramento Fay Island 2113 ·|}þ128 South Fork Putah Creek Executive Airport Frost Lake 2129 haven s Lake Green d n Glanville 1002 a l r Florin e h Glide District 0765 t S a c r a m e n t o e N Glide EBMUD Grand Island 0003 District Pocket Freeport Grizzly West 2136 Lake Intake Hastings Tract 2060 l Holland Tract 2025 Berryessa e n Holt Station 2116 n Freeport 505 h Honker Bay 2130 %&'( a g strict Elk Grove u Lisbon Di Hotchkiss Tract 0799 h lo S C Jersey Island 0830 Babe l Dixon p s i Kasson District 2085 s h a King Island 2044 S p Libby Mcneil 0369 y r !"#$5 ·|}þ99 B e !"#$80 t Liberty Island 2093 o l a Lisbon District 0307 o Clarksburg Y W l a Little Egbert Tract 2084 S o l a n o n p a r C Little Holland Tract 2120 e in e a e M Little Mandeville
  • Transitions for the Delta Economy

    Transitions for the Delta Economy

    Transitions for the Delta Economy January 2012 Josué Medellín-Azuara, Ellen Hanak, Richard Howitt, and Jay Lund with research support from Molly Ferrell, Katherine Kramer, Michelle Lent, Davin Reed, and Elizabeth Stryjewski Supported with funding from the Watershed Sciences Center, University of California, Davis Summary The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta consists of some 737,000 acres of low-lying lands and channels at the confluence of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers (Figure S1). This region lies at the very heart of California’s water policy debates, transporting vast flows of water from northern and eastern California to farming and population centers in the western and southern parts of the state. This critical water supply system is threatened by the likelihood that a large earthquake or other natural disaster could inflict catastrophic damage on its fragile levees, sending salt water toward the pumps at its southern edge. In another area of concern, water exports are currently under restriction while regulators and the courts seek to improve conditions for imperiled native fish. Leading policy proposals to address these issues include improvements in land and water management to benefit native species, and the development of a “dual conveyance” system for water exports, in which a new seismically resistant canal or tunnel would convey a portion of water supplies under or around the Delta instead of through the Delta’s channels. This focus on the Delta has caused considerable concern within the Delta itself, where residents and local governments have worried that changes in water supply and environmental management could harm the region’s economy and residents.
  • Programmatic Environmental Impact Report

    Programmatic Environmental Impact Report

    Water Hyacinth Control Program FINAL Programmatic Environmental Impact Report Volume I – Chapters 1 to 7 November 30, 2009 A program for effective control of Water Hyacinth in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and its tributaries. Copies of this Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Report in hard copy form, or on computer compact disc (CD), can be obtained from the California Department of Boating and Waterways. To request a report copy, please contact: Ms. Terri Ely Aquatic Weed Program California Department of Boating and Waterways 2000 Evergreen Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, California 95815 (916) 263-8138 [email protected] Cover photo: March 14, 2008, by NewPoint Group, Inc., of the Wheeler Island Duck Club, at Honker Bay. [PARTIAL] Water Hyacinth Control Program Water Hyacinth Control Program A program for effective control of Water Hyacinth in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and its tributaries. FINAL Programmatic Environmental Impact Report Volume I – Chapters 1 to 7 November 30, 2009 Prepared by: The California Department of Boating and Waterways With Technical Assistance from: NewPoint Group, Inc. 2555 Third Street, Suite 215 Sacramento, California 95818 (916) 442-0508 www.newpointgroup.com ~----Pei:at f~m.A; _ _,__,..._... AniJru--~- ' --sepat Table of Contents Volume I – Chapters 1 to 7 Page Acronyms and Abbreviations ......................................................... AA-1 Executive Summary.......................................................................... ES-1 1. Introduction ........................................................................................
  • Summary of Delta Dredged Material Placement Sites

    Summary of Delta Dredged Material Placement Sites

    Summary of Delta Dredged Material Placement Sites Capacity Overall Map Dredge Material Placement Active Types of Material Years in Remaining Capacity ID Site (Yes/No) Owner/Operator Accepted Service (CY) (CY) Notes 1 S1 2 S4 3 S7 4 S9 5 S11 Port of Sacramento S12 (Department of 6 1,710,000 3, 5 South Island Prospect Island Interior Bureau of Land Management?) 7 S13 S14 8 USACE N/A 3 Grand Island Placement Site S16 9 USACE 3,000,000 3 Rio Vista Placement Site DWR, Mega S19 10 Sands, Port of 20,000,000 3 Decker Island Placement Site Sacramento S20 Port of Sacramento 11 1,000,000 3, 5 Augusta Pit Placement Site (DWR?) S31 12 Port of Sacramento Placement Port of Sacramento Site Reclamation S32 13 Districts 999 and (six segments) 900 S35 DOW Chemical 14 Montezuma Hills Placement 890,000 3 Company Site 15 SX Sacramento Muni 1 Capacity Overall Map Dredge Material Placement Active Types of Material Years in Remaining Capacity ID Site (Yes/No) Owner/Operator Accepted Service (CY) (CY) Notes Utility District Sherman Lake (Sherman 16 USACE 3,000,000 3 Island?) 17 Montezuma Wetlands Project Montezuma LLC Montezuma Wetlands 18 Montezuma LLC Rehandling Site Expanded Scour Pond Dredge material 19 Placement Site (also called Yes DWR according to WDR #R5- 250,000 1, 2, 3,4 Sherman Island?) 2004-0061 Port of Stockton McCormack Pit Placement maintenance material 20 Site (also called Sherman Yes DWR only 250,000 3,4 Island?) WDR R5-2003-0145 Proposed Iron House Levy repair and 21 Jersey Island Placement Site Restoration 3 Sanitation District maintenance
  • 2010-2011 California Regulations for Waterfowl and Upland Game Hunting, Public Lands

    2010-2011 California Regulations for Waterfowl and Upland Game Hunting, Public Lands

    Table of Contents CALIFORNIA General Information Contacting DFG ....................................... 2 10-11 Licenses, Stamps, & Permits................... 3 Waterfowl & Upland Shoot Time Tables ................................... 4 Game Hunting and Unlawful Activities .......................... 6 Hunting & Other Public Uses on State & Federal Waterfowl Hunting Lands Regulations Summary of Changes for 10-11 ............... 7 Seasons and Limits ................................. 9 Effective July 1, 2010 - June 30, 2011 Waterfowl Consumption Health except as noted. Warnings ............................................. 12 State of California Special Goose Hunt Area Maps ............ 14 Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger Waterfowl Zone Map ....Inside Back Cover Natural Resources Agency Upland Game Bird, Small Game Secretary Lester A. Snow Mammal, and Crow Hunting Regulation Summary ............................. 16 Fish and Game Commission President Jim Kellogg Seasons & Limits Table ......................... 17 Vice President Richard B. Rogers Hunt Zones ............................................ 18 Commissioner Michael Sutton Hunting and Other Public Uses on Commissioner Daniel W. Richards State and Federal Areas Acting Executive Director Jon Fischer Reservation System .............................. 20 General Public Use Activities on Department of Fish and Game Director John McCamman All State Wildlife Areas ....................... 23 Hunting, Firearms, and Archery Alternate communication formats are available upon request. If reasonable
  • GRA 9 – South Delta

    GRA 9 – South Delta

    2-900 .! 2-905 .! 2-950 .! 2-952 2-908 .! .! 2-910 .! 2-960 .! 2-915 .! 2-963 .! 2-964 2-965 .! .! 2-917 .! 2-970 2-920 ! .! . 2-922 .! 2-924 .! 2-974 .! San Joaquin County 2-980 2-929 .! .! 2-927 .! .! 2-925 2-932 2-940 Contra Costa .! .! County .! 2-930 2-935 .! Alameda 2-934 County ! . Sources: Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ, USGS, Intermap, iPC, NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), TomTom, 2013 Calif. Dept. of Fish and Wildlife Area Map Office of Spill Prevention and Response I Data Source: O SPR NAD_1983_C alifornia_Teale_Albers ACP2 - GRA9 Requestor: ACP Coordinator Author: J. Muskat Date Created: 5/2 Environmental Sensitive Sites Section 9849 – GRA 9 South Delta Table of Contents GRA 9 Map ............................................................................................................................... 1 Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................... 2 Site Index/Response Action ...................................................................................................... 3 Summary of Response Resources for GRA 9......................................................................... 4 9849.1 Environmentally Sensitive Sites 2-900-A Old River Mouth at San Joaquin River....................................................... 1 2-905-A Franks Tract Complex................................................................................... 4 2-908-A Sand Mound Slough ..................................................................................
  • Transitions for the Delta Economy

    Transitions for the Delta Economy

    Transitions for the Delta Economy January 2012 Josué Medellín-Azuara, Ellen Hanak, Richard Howitt, and Jay Lund with research support from Molly Ferrell, Katherine Kramer, Michelle Lent, Davin Reed, and Elizabeth Stryjewski Supported with funding from the Watershed Sciences Center, University of California, Davis Summary The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta consists of some 737,000 acres of low-lying lands and channels at the confluence of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers (Figure S1). This region lies at the very heart of California’s water policy debates, transporting vast flows of water from northern and eastern California to farming and population centers in the western and southern parts of the state. This critical water supply system is threatened by the likelihood that a large earthquake or other natural disaster could inflict catastrophic damage on its fragile levees, sending salt water toward the pumps at its southern edge. In another area of concern, water exports are currently under restriction while regulators and the courts seek to improve conditions for imperiled native fish. Leading policy proposals to address these issues include improvements in land and water management to benefit native species, and the development of a “dual conveyance” system for water exports, in which a new seismically resistant canal or tunnel would convey a portion of water supplies under or around the Delta instead of through the Delta’s channels. This focus on the Delta has caused considerable concern within the Delta itself, where residents and local governments have worried that changes in water supply and environmental management could harm the region’s economy and residents.
  • Workshop Report—Earthquakes and High Water As Levee Hazards in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta

    Workshop Report—Earthquakes and High Water As Levee Hazards in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta

    Workshop report—Earthquakes and High Water as Levee Hazards in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Delta Independent Science Board September 30, 2016 Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Workshop ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Scope ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Structure ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Participants and affiliations ........................................................................................................ 2 Highlights .................................................................................................................................... 3 Earthquakes ............................................................................................................................. 3 High water ............................................................................................................................... 4 Perspectives....................................................................................................................................
  • Comparing Futures for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta

    Comparing Futures for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta

    comparing futures for the sacramento–san joaquin delta jay lund | ellen hanak | william fleenor william bennett | richard howitt jeffrey mount | peter moyle 2008 Public Policy Institute of California Supported with funding from Stephen D. Bechtel Jr. and the David and Lucile Packard Foundation ISBN: 978-1-58213-130-6 Copyright © 2008 by Public Policy Institute of California All rights reserved San Francisco, CA Short sections of text, not to exceed three paragraphs, may be quoted without written permission provided that full attribution is given to the source and the above copyright notice is included. PPIC does not take or support positions on any ballot measure or on any local, state, or federal legislation, nor does it endorse, support, or oppose any political parties or candidates for public office. Research publications reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff, officers, or Board of Directors of the Public Policy Institute of California. Summary “Once a landscape has been established, its origins are repressed from memory. It takes on the appearance of an ‘object’ which has been there, outside us, from the start.” Karatani Kojin (1993), Origins of Japanese Literature The Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta is the hub of California’s water supply system and the home of numerous native fish species, five of which already are listed as threatened or endangered. The recent rapid decline of populations of many of these fish species has been followed by court rulings restricting water exports from the Delta, focusing public and political attention on one of California’s most important and iconic water controversies.
  • Draft Environmental Assessment for the Shiloh Iii Wind Plant Project Habitat Conservation Plan

    Draft Environmental Assessment for the Shiloh Iii Wind Plant Project Habitat Conservation Plan

    DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE SHILOH III WIND PLANT PROJECT HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN P REPARED BY: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 2800 Cottage Way, W-2650 Sacramento, CA 95825 Contact: Mike Thomas, Chief Habitat Conservation Planning Branch W ITH TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FROM: ICF International 630 K Street, Suite 400 Sacramento, CA 95814 Contact: Brad Schafer 916.737.3000 February 2011 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2011. Draft Environmental Assessment for the Shiloh III Wind Plant Project Habitat Conservation Plan. February. (ICF 00263.09). Sacramento, CA. With technical assistance from ICF International, Sacramento, CA. Contents Chapter 1 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................... 1‐1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................ 1‐1 1.2 Species Covered by the HCP ...................................................................................................... 1‐2 1.3 Proposed Action Addressed in this EA ....................................................................................... 1‐2 1.4 Purpose of and Need for the Proposed Action .......................................................................... 1‐2 Chapter 2 Proposed Action and Alternatives .................................................................................. 2‐1 2.1 Alternative 1: Proposed Action .................................................................................................
  • Structured Decision Making for Delta Smelt Demo Project

    Structured Decision Making for Delta Smelt Demo Project

    Structured Decision Making for Delta Smelt Demo Project Prepared for CSAMP/CAMT Project funded by State and Federal Water Contractors Prepared by Graham Long and Sally Rudd Compass Resource Management Ltd. 604.641.2875 Suite 210- 111 Water Street Vancouver, British Columbia Canada V6B 1A7 www.compassrm.com Date May 4, 2018 April 13th – reviewed by TWG and comments incorporated Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... i Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... iii Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 Approach .......................................................................................................................... 1 Problem Definition ........................................................................................................... 4 Objectives ......................................................................................................................... 5 Alternatives ...................................................................................................................... 9 Evaluation of Trade-offs ................................................................................................. 17 Discussion and Recommendations ................................................................................
  • 550. Regulations for General Public Use Activities on All State Wildlife Areas Listed

    550. Regulations for General Public Use Activities on All State Wildlife Areas Listed

    550. Regulations for General Public Use Activities on All State Wildlife Areas Listed Below. (a) State Wildlife Areas: (1) Antelope Valley Wildlife Area (Sierra County) (Type C); (2) Ash Creek Wildlife Area (Lassen and Modoc counties) (Type B); (3) Bass Hill Wildlife Area (Lassen County), including the Egan Management Unit (Type C); (4) Battle Creek Wildlife Area (Shasta and Tehama counties); (5) Big Lagoon Wildlife Area (Humboldt County) (Type C); (6) Big Sandy Wildlife Area (Monterey and San Luis Obispo counties) (Type C); (7) Biscar Wildlife Area (Lassen County) (Type C); (8) Buttermilk Country Wildlife Area (Inyo County) (Type C); (9) Butte Valley Wildlife Area (Siskiyou County) (Type B); (10) Cache Creek Wildlife Area (Colusa and Lake counties), including the Destanella Flat and Harley Gulch management units (Type C); (11) Camp Cady Wildlife Area (San Bernadino County) (Type C); (12) Cantara/Ney Springs Wildlife Area (Siskiyou County) (Type C); (13) Cedar Roughs Wildlife Area (Napa County) (Type C); (14) Cinder Flats Wildlife Area (Shasta County) (Type C); (15) Collins Eddy Wildlife Area (Sutter and Yolo counties) (Type C); (16) Colusa Bypass Wildlife Area (Colusa County) (Type C); (17) Coon Hollow Wildlife Area (Butte County) (Type C); (18) Cottonwood Creek Wildlife Area (Merced County), including the Upper Cottonwood and Lower Cottonwood management units (Type C); (19) Crescent City Marsh Wildlife Area (Del Norte County); (20) Crocker Meadow Wildlife Area (Plumas County) (Type C); (21) Daugherty Hill Wildlife Area (Yuba County)