Hearing in Fishes Under Noise Conditions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hearing in Fishes Under Noise Conditions JARO 6: 28–36 (2005) DOI: 10.1007/s10162-004-4043-4 Hearing in Fishes under Noise Conditions LIDIA EVA WYSOCKI AND FRIEDRICH LADICH Institute of Zoology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria Received: 13 October 2003; Accepted: 27 September 2004; Online publication: 3 December 2004 ABSTRACT hearing specialists, are limited by noise regimes in their environment. Ourcurrentknowledgeon sound detection in fishes is Keywords: auditory evoked potential, auditory mainly based on data acquired under quiet laborato- sensitivity, hearing specializations, masking, teleosts ry conditions. However, it is important to relate auditory thresholds to background noise in order to determine the signal-detecting abilities of animals in the natural environment. We investigated the influ- ence of two noise levels within the naturally occurring INTRODUCTION range on the auditory sensitivity of two hearing specialists (otophysines) and a hearing generalist. The auditory system is particularly important for Audiograms of the goldfish Carassius auratus, the aquatic vertebrates when visual orientation is restrict- lined Raphael catfish Platydoras costatus and the ed. Sounds from different sources provide them with pumpkinseed sunfish Lepomis gibbosus (hearing gen- information relevant for survival, e.g., finding mates eralist) were determined between 200 and 4000 Hz and prey or avoiding predators. The natural environ- (100Y800 Hz for L. gibbosus) under laboratory con- ment of fishes, especially that of marine fishes ditions and under continuous white noise by record- (Knudsen et al. 1948; Wenz 1962; Urick 1983; ing auditory evoked potentials (AEPs). Baseline Myrberg 1990), but also freshwater habitats (Hawkins thresholds showed greatest hearing sensitivity around and Johnstone 1978; Rogers and Cox 1988; Lugli 500 Hz in goldfish and catfish and at 100 Hz in the and Fine 2003), is characterized by a permanent sunfish. Continuous white noise of 110 dB RMS background noise of abiotic (currents, rain, seismic elevated the thresholds by 15Y20 dB in C. auratus events, coastal surf) and biotic (vocalizations of ani- and by 4Y22 dB in P. costatus. White noise of 130 dB mals, photosynthesis) origin. In addition, the amount RMS elevated overall hearing thresholds significantly of man-made noise caused by ship and air traffic, in the otophysines by 23Y44 dB. In the goldfish, hydroelectric power plants, or drilling is increasing. threshold did not shift at 4 kHz. In contrast, auditory Thus noise is an omnipresent environmental con- thresholds in the sunfish declined only at the higher straint on the auditory system of fishes and ultimately noise level by 7Y11 dB. Our data show that the AEP determines the detectability of sounds relevant to recording technique is suitable for studying masking their orientation toward prey, predators, and con- in fishes, and that the occurrence and degree of the specifics, and to acoustic communication in their threshold shift (masking) depend on the hearing environment. sensitivity of fishes, the frequency, and noise levels Most investigations on sound detection in fishes, tested. The results indicate that acoustic communi- however, were performed under quiet laboratory con- cation and orientation of fishes, in particular of ditions, and their results may be ill-suited to informa- tion on the ability of fishes to detect signals in their natural environment. In terrestrial animals it is long known (e.g., Fletcher 1940) that the detection of one Present address: Lidia Eva Wysocki, Department of Biology, Univer- signal can be impaired by the presence of another (i.e., sity of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA. noise), a phenomenon termed masking. Several prior Correspondence to: Lidia Eva Wysocki & Department of Biology & University of Maryland & College Park, MD 20742, USA. Telephone: investigations have addressed this issue in fishes. (431)-4277-54515; fax: (431)-4277-9544; email: [email protected] Tavolga (1967) and Buerkle (1968, 1969) observed 28 WYSOCKI AND LADICH: Hearing in Fishes under Noise 29 elevated auditory thresholds in the presence of which are available from prior studies (Fay 1974; Fay increased background noise in the squirrelfish Hol- and Coombs 1983). All animals were kept in planted ocentrus rufus, the grunt Haemulon sciurus, and the cod aquaria whose bottoms were covered with sand, Gadus morhua. Studies conducted in the field on equipped with half flower pots as hiding places, filtered several other marine teleosts (Melanogrammus aeglefi- by external filters, and maintained at a 12L:12D cycle. nus, Pollachius pollachius, G. morhua, Molva molva; The fishes were fed live Tubifex sp., chironomid larvae, Chapman 1973; Chapman and Hawkins 1973) have or commercially prepared flake food (Tetramin\) confirmed that masking can occur even under daily. No submerged filters or air stones were used in relatively quiet sea conditions, suggesting that abso- order to reduce noise in the holding tanks. Back- lute sensitivity of the auditory system is less important ground noise in the holding tanks ranged from 110 to than the ability to discriminate between relevant 115 dB LLeq for the otophysines, and from 124 to 127 sound stimuli and background noise. All those dB LLeq for L. gibbosus. All experiments were per- experiments together pointed out the need to relate formed with the permission of the Austrian Commis- auditory thresholds to background noise in order to sion on Experiments in Animals (GZ 68.210/50-Pr/4/ determine the signal-detecting abilities in the natural 2002). environment. The main objectives of our study were to investi- Auditory evoked potential recordings gate (1) to which extent white noise at naturally occurring sound pressure levels (SPL) affect hearing The AEP recording protocol used in this study thresholds, (2) to which degree different frequen- followed that recently described in Wysocki and cies are masked, and (3) whether fishes with dif- Ladich (2001, 2002, 2003). Therefore, only a brief ferent hearing abilities are differently affected by summary of the basic technique is given here. similar noise levels. A further goal (4) was to eval- During the experiments, the fishes were mildly uate the usefulness of the auditory evoked potential immobilized with Flaxedil (gallamine triethiodide; (AEP) method in studying masking in fishes by com- Sigma). The dosage used was 0.90Y1.9 mggj1 for paring our results to behaviorally obtained data (Fay C. auratus,1.3Y3.3 mggj1 for P. costatus, and 2.4Y5.8 1974; Fay and Coombs 1983) in goldfish. This is a first mggj1 for L. gibbosus. This dosage allowed the fishes step before addressing a wider range of issues related to retain slight opercular movements during the to the impacts of natural noise on the biology of experiments but without significant myogenic noise fishes. to interfere with the recording. Test subjects were Our test animals were two hearing specialists, the secured in a bowl-shaped plastic tub (diameter: 37 cypriniform Carassius auratus (goldfish) and the cm, water depth: 8 cm, 2 cm layer of fine sand) lined sound-producing siluriform Platydoras costatus (lined on the inside with acoustically absorbent material Raphael catfish), and a vocal hearing generalist, the (air-filled packing wrap) in order to reduce resonan- perciform Lepomis gibbosus (pumpkinseed sunfish). ces and reflections (for the illustration of the effect, Noise is highly variable in the natural environment see Fig. 1 in Wysocki and Ladich 2002). Fishes were (Wenz 1962; Hawkins and Johnstone 1978; Urick 1983) and its biological relevance mostly unknown. Therefore and in order to compare our results to previous data, we applied white (Gaussian) noise with a relatively flat frequency spectrum as a masker. MATERIALS AND METHODS Animals Test subjects were seven goldfish C. auratus (88Y 98 mm standard length, 22.3Y28 g body weight) from a pond near Vienna, six lined Raphael catfish P. cos- tatus (99Y124 mm standard length; 22.9Y38.8 g body mass), and seven pumpkinseed sunfish L. gibbosus (79Y94 mm; 15.6Y26.2 g). The latter two species were FIG. 1. Cepstrum-smoothed (coefficients: 64) spectra of mean obtained from local pet suppliers. Goldfish were cho- laboratory noise (lower line), white noise of 110 dB LLeq (mid line) and of 130 dB LLeq (upper line). Cepstrum-smoothed spectra are sen because there exists a large amount of behavioral plotted for better representation. Cepstrum smoothing is a mathe- and neurophysiological data on diverse aspects of matical calculation (Noll 1967) for the representation of the mean their hearing abilities including behavioral masking energy content of fluctuating sound spectra. 30 WYSOCKI AND LADICH: Hearing in Fishes under Noise positioned below the water surface (except for the con- sure levels of tone-burst stimuli were reduced in 4 dB tacting points of the electrodes, which were maximally steps until the AEP waveform was no longer apparent. 1 mm above the surface) in the center of the plastic The lowest SPL for which a repeatable AEP trace could tub. be obtained, as determined by overlaying replicate A respiration pipette was inserted into the subject’s traces, was considered the threshold (Kenyon et al. mouth. Respiration was achieved through a simple 1998). temperature-controlled (24 T 1 -C), gravity-fed water A hydrophone (Bru¨el & K jaer 8101, frequency circulation system. The AEPs were recorded by using range: 1 HzY80 kHz T 2 dB; voltage sensitivity: j184 silver wire electrodes (0.25 mm diameter) pressed re 1 V/mPa) was placed close to the right side of the firmly against the skin. The portion of the head above animals (2 cm apart) in order to determine absolute the water surface was covered by a small piece of SPLs underwater in close vicinity of the subjects. Kimwipes tissue paper to keep it moist and to ensure Control measurements showed that, in accordance proper contact during experiments. The recording with theoretical expectations (due to increasing electrode was placed in the midline of the skull over distance from the loudspeaker), SPLs decreased with the region of the medulla and the reference electrode increasing distance from the center of the tub as well cranially between the nares.
Recommended publications
  • Year of the Catfish with the Intention of Writing an Article Relating to Some Aspect of Catfish in the Aquarium on a Monthly Basis
    YYeeaarr ooff tthhee CCaattffiisshh A monthly column about Catfish Talking... (Doradidae) by Derek Tustin (Author’s Note: I started The Year of the Catfish with the intention of writing an article relating to some aspect of Catfish in the aquarium on a monthly basis. Last month, April 2013, I did not. I know this caused a bit of consternation on the part of Klaus Steinhaus, the editor of Tank Talk, and he had to find another article to fill the space. As such, I offer both he and the readers of Tank Talk my sincere apologies and to make up for it, give you a double helping of The Year of the Catfish this month. – Derek P.S. Tustin) o you have that one fish species of fish that you have Agamyxis pectinifrons D an unbridled affinity for? That one special species that just strikes a chord with you that you want to keep no matter what? Perhaps something that you have kept every time the opportunity presents? I think we all have a small group of species that no matter how unattractive other aquarists may find them, we want to keep them. I think you all know by now my absolute fascination with rainbowfish, and the extent that I am willing to go to obtain certain species. Given that, you might be surprised to know that my “soft-spot species” isn’t a rainbowfish, but rather a catfish, specifically the White-Spotted Doradid, Agamyxis pectinifrons. (Or it actually might be… but I’ll get to that in a bit.) Agamyxis pectinifrons is a member of the Doradidae family.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Platydoras Costatus (Raphael Catfish) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Raphael Catfish (Platydoras costatus) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, February 2011 Revised, July 2018 Web Version, 9/20/2019 Photo: Erling Holm, via FishWise Professional. Licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC-SA. Available: http://eol.org/data_objects/24181426. (July 2018). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Nico et al. (2018): “South America, from Venezuela and the Guianas to Argentina (Robins et al. 1991), including the Amazon, Tocantins, Parnaíba, Orinoco, and Essequibo River basins and coastal drainages in French Guiana and Suriname.” From Piorski et al. (2008): “[…] coastal drainages of Suriname and French Guiana […]” 1 From Eschmeyer et al. (2018): “Distribution: Amazon, Tocantins, Parnaíba, Orinoco and Essequibo River basins and coastal drainages in French Guiana and Suriname: Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador, ?Colombia, French Guiana, Guyana, Peru, Suriname and Venezuela. But perhaps only coastal drainages of Suriname and French Guiana.” Conflicting descriptions of the distribution of P. costatus are apparent in the quotations above. In this ERSS, the broader definition is used because most information available refers to this definition of the species range. Status in the United States From Nico et al. (2018): “Reported from Florida and Texas. Likely failed introduction: there have been no additional specimens or reports since initial sightings.” Nico et al. (2018) report that the record from Florida dates to 1984 and the record from Texas dates to 1999. VertNet (2018) reports an occurrence in May 2002 in New Mexico: “Caught 15 May 2002 by Frank Jimenez of Tesuque […] at Santa Cruz Lake, Santa Fe Co. with a net as it was swimming near shoreline.” The frequency of this species in trade is unclear (see Remarks).
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Piscivores in a Species-Rich Tropical Food
    THE ROLE OF PISCIVORES IN A SPECIES-RICH TROPICAL RIVER A Dissertation by CRAIG ANTHONY LAYMAN Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2004 Major Subject: Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences THE ROLE OF PISCIVORES IN A SPECIES-RICH TROPICAL RIVER A Dissertation by CRAIG ANTHONY LAYMAN Submitted to Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved as to style and content by: _________________________ _________________________ Kirk O. Winemiller Lee Fitzgerald (Chair of Committee) (Member) _________________________ _________________________ Kevin Heinz Daniel L. Roelke (Member) (Member) _________________________ Robert D. Brown (Head of Department) August 2004 Major Subject: Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences iii ABSTRACT The Role of Piscivores in a Species-Rich Tropical River. (August 2004) Craig Anthony Layman, B.S., University of Virginia; M.S., University of Virginia Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Kirk O. Winemiller Much of the world’s species diversity is located in tropical and sub-tropical ecosystems, and a better understanding of the ecology of these systems is necessary to stem biodiversity loss and assess community- and ecosystem-level responses to anthropogenic impacts. In this dissertation, I endeavored to broaden our understanding of complex ecosystems through research conducted on the Cinaruco River, a floodplain river in Venezuela, with specific emphasis on how a human-induced perturbation, commercial netting activity, may affect food web structure and function. I employed two approaches in this work: (1) comparative analyses based on descriptive food web characteristics, and (2) experimental manipulations within important food web modules.
    [Show full text]
  • A 1 Case Study with Amazonian Fishes
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.18.440157; this version posted April 21, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 The critical role of natural history museums in advancing eDNA for biodiversity studies: a 2 case study with Amazonian fishes 3 4 C. David de Santana1*, Lynne R. Parenti1, Casey B. Dillman2, Jonathan A. Coddington3, D. A. 5 Bastos 4, Carole C. Baldwin1, Jansen Zuanon5, Gislene Torrente-Vilara6, Raphaël Covain7, 6 Naércio A. Menezes8, Aléssio Datovo8, T. Sado9, M. Miya9 7 8 1 Division of Fishes, Department of Vertebrate Zoology, MRC 159, National Museum of 9 Natural History, PO Box 37012, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA 10 2 Cornell University Museum of Vertebrates, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 11 Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14850, USA 12 3 Global Genome Initiative, National Museum of Natural History, PO Box 37012, Smithsonian 13 Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA 14 4 Programa de PósGraduação em Ciências Biológicas (BADPI), Instituto Nacional de 15 Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus, Brazil 16 5 Coordenacão de Biodiversidade, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia, Manaus, 17 Amazonas, Brazil 18 6 Instituto do Mar, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Campus Baixada Santista, Santos, São 19 Paulo, Brazil 20 7 Muséum d’histoire naturelle, Département d’herpétologie et d’ichtyologie, route de Malagnou 21 1, case postale 6434, CH-1211, Genève 6, Switzerland 22 8 Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo (MZUSP), Av.
    [Show full text]
  • Guam Marine Biosecurity Action Plan
    GuamMarine Biosecurity Action Plan September 2014 This Marine Biosecurity Action Plan was prepared by the University of Guam Center for Island Sustainability under award NA11NOS4820007 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Coral Reef Conservation Program, as administered by the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management and the Bureau of Statistics and Plans, Guam Coastal Management Program. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Guam Marine Biosecurity Action Plan Author: Roxanna Miller First Released in Fall 2014 About this Document The Guam Marine Biosecurity Plan was created by the University of Guam’s Center for Island Sustainability under award NA11NOS4820007 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Coral Reef Conservation Program, as administered by the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management and the Bureau of Statistics and Plans, Guam Coastal Management Program. Information and recommendations within this document came through the collaboration of a variety of both local and federal agencies, including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), the NOAA Coral Reef Conservation Program (CRCP), the University of Guam (UOG), the Guam Department of Agriculture’s Division of Aquatic and Wildlife Resources (DAWR), the United States Coast Guard (USCG), the Port Authority of Guam, the National Park Service
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Checklist of the Freshwater Fishes of Colombia
    Biota Colombiana ISSN: 0124-5376 [email protected] Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos "Alexander von Humboldt" Colombia Maldonado-Ocampo, Javier A.; Vari, Richard P.; Saulo Usma, José Checklist of the Freshwater Fishes of Colombia Biota Colombiana, vol. 9, núm. 2, 2008, pp. 143-237 Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos "Alexander von Humboldt" Bogotá, Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=49120960001 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Biota Colombiana 9 (2) 143 - 237, 2008 Checklist of the Freshwater Fishes of Colombia Javier A. Maldonado-Ocampo1; Richard P. Vari2; José Saulo Usma3 1 Investigador Asociado, curador encargado colección de peces de agua dulce, Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. Claustro de San Agustín, Villa de Leyva, Boyacá, Colombia. Dirección actual: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Museu Nacional, Departamento de Vertebrados, Quinta da Boa Vista, 20940- 040 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. [email protected] 2 Division of Fishes, Department of Vertebrate Zoology, MRC--159, National Museum of Natural History, PO Box 37012, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20013—7012. [email protected] 3 Coordinador Programa Ecosistemas de Agua Dulce WWF Colombia. Calle 61 No 3 A 26, Bogotá D.C., Colombia. [email protected] Abstract Data derived from the literature supplemented by examination of specimens in collections show that 1435 species of native fishes live in the freshwaters of Colombia.
    [Show full text]
  • Platydoras Brachylecis, a New Species of Thorny Catfish (Siluriformes: Doradidae) from Northeastern Brazil
    Neotropical Ichthyology, 6(3):481-494, 2008 Copyright © 2008 Sociedade Brasileira de Ictiologia Platydoras brachylecis, a new species of thorny catfish (Siluriformes: Doradidae) from northeastern Brazil Nivaldo M. Piorski1, Julio C. Garavello2, Mariangeles Arce H.3 and Mark H. Sabaj Pérez4 Platydoras brachylecis, new species, is described from coastal drainages of northeastern Brazil (Pindaré to Parnaíba rivers), and diagnosed from congeners by the unique combination of: pale yellow to white stripe beginning above orbits, continuing midlaterally on body and onto middle rays of caudal fin; skin in axil of each midlateral thorn without concentration of pigment forming small dark spot, midlateral scutes shallow (depth of 10th scute 8.8-11.9% of SL), and midlateral scutes on caudal peduncle distinctly separated by strip of skin from middorsal and midventral caudal-peduncle plates. Three additional species of Platydoras are recognized as valid: P. armatulus (lower Orinoco, Amazon and Paraguay-Paraná drainages), P. costatus (coastal drainages of Suriname and French Guiana), and P. hancockii (upper Orinoco, Negro, Essequibo and Demerara drain- ages). The nominal species P. dentatus and P. helicophilus are tentatively treated as junior synonyms of P. costatus. A key to species of Platydoras is provided. Platydoras brachylecis, espécie nova, é descrita para as drenagens costeiras do nordeste do Brasil (rios Pindaré a Parnaíba) e diagnosticada de suas congêneres pela exclusiva combinação dos seguintes caracteres: faixa amarelo-pálida a branco iniciando acima das órbitas, continuando médio-lateralmente sobre o corpo e atingindo os raios medianos da nadadeira caudal; pele das axilas dos espinhos médio-laterais sem concentração de pequenas pintas negras; escudos médio-laterais baixos (altura do décimo escudo 8.8-11.9% do comprimento padrão) e escudos médio-laterais do pedúnculo caudal distintamente separados das placas médio-dorsais e médio-ventrais da mesma região por uma faixa de pele.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Critical Role of Natural History Museums in Advancing Edna for Biodiversity Studies: a 2 Case Study with Amazonian Fishes 3 4 C
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.18.440157; this version posted April 19, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 The critical role of natural history museums in advancing eDNA for biodiversity studies: a 2 case study with Amazonian fishes 3 4 C. David de Santana1*, Lynne R. Parenti1, Casey Dillman2, Jonathan Coddington3, D. A. Bastos 4, 5 Carole Baldwin1, Jansen Zuanon5, Gislene Torrente-Vilara6, Raphaël Covain7, Naércio A. 6 Menezes8, Aléssio Datovo8, T. Sado9, M. Miya9 7 8 1 Division of Fishes, Department of Vertebrate Zoology, MRC 159, National Museum of 9 Natural History, PO Box 37012, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA 10 2 Cornell University Museum of Vertebrates, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 11 Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14850, USA 12 3 Global Genome Initiative, National Museum of Natural History, PO Box 37012, Smithsonian 13 Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA 14 4 Programa de PósGraduação em Ciências Biológicas (BADPI), Instituto Nacional de 15 Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus, Brazil 16 5 Coordenacão de Biodiversidade, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia, Manaus, 17 Amazonas, Brazil 18 6 Instituto do Mar, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Campus Baixada Santista, Santos, São 19 Paulo, Brazil 20 7 Muséum d’histoire naturelle, Département d’herpétologie et d’ichtyologie, route de Malagnou 21 1, case postale 6434, CH-1211, Genève 6, Switzerland 22 8 Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo (MZUSP), Av.
    [Show full text]
  • Striped Raphael Catfish
    Striped Raphael catfish Striped Raphael catfish (Platydoras armatulus) is a catfish of the family Doradidae. It may also be called Southern striped Striped Raphael catfish Raphael, talking catfish, chocolate doradid, chocolate catfish or thorny catfish.[1] It is native to the Amazon, Paraguay–Paraná and lower Orinoco basins in South America.[2] This peaceful, nocturnal species is a popular aquarium fish due to its pleasant temperament and curious nature.[3] This catfish has long been confused with Platydoras costatus of Suriname and French Guiana, where the pale stripe on the body does not extend onto the head.[2] Scientific classification Domain: Eukaryota Contents Kingdom: Animalia Description and behavior Phylum: Chordata In the aquarium Class: Actinopterygii See also Order: Siluriformes References Family: Doradidae Genus: Platydoras Description and behavior Species: P. armatulus These fish burrow in the soft river bottoms and frequently occurs Binomial name on sandy bottoms.[4] These fish feed on mollusks, crustaceans and Platydoras armatulus organic debris.[4] (Valenciennes, 1840) They have rigid pectoral fin spines. The striped Raphael catfish Synonyms also has tiny and curved protective spines running along its body. The typically reported maximum standard length of this species is Doras armatulus 20–24 cm (7.9–9.4 in).[5][6] Considerably larger individuals, up to 43 cm (17 in) long, have been reported from the Tocantins– Valenciennes, 1840 Araguaia basin,[4][7] but this population, together with those from the Tapajós and Xingu, likely represent an undescribed species (not to be confused with P. birindellii, a species from the Xingu basin that was described in 2018).[2][8] Juvenile striped raphael catfish have been recorded cleaning piscivorous fish such as Hoplias cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Unrestricted Species
    UNRESTRICTED SPECIES Actinopterygii (Ray-finned Fishes) Atheriniformes (Silversides) Scientific Name Common Name Bedotia geayi Madagascar Rainbowfish Melanotaenia boesemani Boeseman's Rainbowfish Melanotaenia maylandi Maryland's Rainbowfish Melanotaenia splendida Eastern Rainbow Fish Beloniformes (Needlefishes) Scientific Name Common Name Dermogenys pusilla Wrestling Halfbeak Characiformes (Piranhas, Leporins, Piranhas) Scientific Name Common Name Abramites hypselonotus Highbacked Headstander Acestrorhynchus falcatus Red Tail Freshwater Barracuda Acestrorhynchus falcirostris Yellow Tail Freshwater Barracuda Anostomus anostomus Striped Headstander Anostomus spiloclistron False Three Spotted Anostomus Anostomus ternetzi Ternetz's Anostomus Anostomus varius Checkerboard Anostomus Astyanax mexicanus Blind Cave Tetra Boulengerella maculata Spotted Pike Characin Carnegiella strigata Marbled Hatchetfish Chalceus macrolepidotus Pink-Tailed Chalceus Charax condei Small-scaled Glass Tetra Charax gibbosus Glass Headstander Chilodus punctatus Spotted Headstander Distichodus notospilus Red-finned Distichodus Distichodus sexfasciatus Six-banded Distichodus Exodon paradoxus Bucktoothed Tetra Gasteropelecus sternicla Common Hatchetfish Gymnocorymbus ternetzi Black Skirt Tetra Hasemania nana Silver-tipped Tetra Hemigrammus erythrozonus Glowlight Tetra Hemigrammus ocellifer Head and Tail Light Tetra Hemigrammus pulcher Pretty Tetra Hemigrammus rhodostomus Rummy Nose Tetra *Except if listed on: IUCN Red List (Endangered, Critically Endangered, or Extinct
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Notes
    Neotropical Ichthyology, 1(2):137-139, 2003 Copyright © 2003 Sociedade Brasileira de Ictiologia Scientific Notes Record of cleaning behavior by Platydoras costatus (Siluriformes: Doradidae) in the Amazon Basin, Brazil Lucélia Nobre Carvalho*, Rafael Arruda** and Jansen Zuanon*** Records of cleaning symbiosis between freshwater fish are scarce. Here we report on juvenile catfish, Platydoras costatus, cleaning the piscivorous characin Hoplias cf. malabaricus in a stream of the rio Araguaia drainage in the Brazilian Amazon. The scarcity of records on cleaning behavior in freshwater systems seems to be in part a consequence of the few observational studies under natural conditions in the Neotropics. Otherwise, the rareness of this behavior in freshwaters is possibly related to the short evolutionary time available to the fish fauna to develop these complex interactions, when compared to the ocean environment. Registros de simbiose de limpeza entre peixes dulcícolas são raros. No presente trabalho registramos um juvenil de Platydoras costatus, limpando uma traíra, Hoplias cf. malabaricus em um riacho do rio Araguaia, Bacia Amazônica. A escassez de registros de comportamento de limpeza em peixes de água doce parece ser uma conseqüência dos poucos estudos subaquáticos nos Neotrópicos. Por outro lado, a raridade deste comportamento em ambientes dulcícolas está possivelmente relacionada ao curto tempo evolutivo disponível para o desenvolvimento de interações complexas, quando comparada ao ambiente marinho. Key words: Erythrinidae, Hoplias cf. malabaricus, piscivorous client, juvenile cleaner, rio Araguaia. Cleaning symbiosis is defined as an interspecific coope- biosis between two freshwater fishes a juvenile catfish, rative interaction, in which a micro-carnivore (cleaner) forage Platydoras costatus (Doradidae) and Hoplias cf.
    [Show full text]