IMDAC AGENDA ITEM 3.1 Officer: Gabrielle Mcmahon Planning & Assessment Division Department of Planning Transport and Infrastructure

IMDAC AGENDA ITEM 3.1 Officer: Gabrielle McMahon Planning & Assessment Division Department of Planning Transport and Infrastructure

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PLANNING REPORT PAGES AGENDA REPORT 2-14 ATTACHMENTS PERSPECTIVES, APPLICATION FORM, LETTERS, GTA REPORT 15-34 PLANS, ELEVATIONS 35-49 HERITAGE ADVICE 50-57 GOVERNMENT ARCHITECT ADVICE 58-60 COUNCIL ADVICE 61-65 PREVIOUS APPROVED PLANS 66-78

AGENDA ITEM: 3.1

Application No: 020/0005/12A Variation 1 KNET Reference: 8437747 (2013/13987/01) Applicant: Light Square Investments Pty Ltd Proposal: Variation to the approval for a 16 level mixed use development incorporating a State Heritage Place VARIATION INCLUDES: additional height, reconfiguration of internal layout, increase in office accommodation, reduction in the number of apartments, additional car parking, works affecting a State Heritage item Subject Land: 69 – 71 Light Square, Adelaide Relevant Authority: Inner Metropolitan Development Assessment Committee of DAC Role of the Commission: Schedule 10 (4b) of the Development Regulations 2008: development that exceeds $10m in the City of Adelaide Zone / Policy Area: Capital City Zone Categorisation: Merit Notification: Category 1 Lodgement Date: 3 July 2013 (amendments made – up to 5 March 2014) Council: Adelaide City Council Development Plan: Adelaide (City) Development Plan, consolidated 26 September 2013 Referral Agencies: State Heritage Unit, Government Architect, Adelaide Airport Officers Report: Gabrielle McMahon Recommendation: Planning Consent subject to conditions and reserved matters

PLANNING REPORT

1. BACKGROUND

On 15 February 2013 the Commission granted consent to the DA 020/0005/12A for the construction of a 16 level residential apartment building with ground floor commercial tenancy upon the site of the State Heritage listed former City Mission Hall, Light Square, Adelaide. It is noted that this application was deferred twice by the Commission. Amendments were subsequently made that satisfied the Commission.

This application included:

 Retention of the front portion of the State Heritage listed former ‘City Mission Hall’ located upon the site  Construction of a 15 storey residential building within and above the heritage place  Total of 57 residential units comprising a mixture of one (1), two (2) and three (3) bedroom apartments  Ground floor commercial space with mezzanine, constructed within the walls of the heritage place – 350m² of total floor area over the two levels  Amenity space/gymnasium for the use of residential tenants on the second floor  Car parking for 39 cars within a fully automated car stacking system accessed from the rear of the site via Ann Street  Two (2) short term parks for loading/unloading adjacent the car stacker at the rear  14 bicycle parking spaces provided on the ground floor at the rear of the site (reserve matter for 40 spaces to be provided)  Plant rooms at the rear of the building on the second and third floor with additional roof top plant and services proposed

The applicant has also received an approval for a 12 month extension of time to substantially commence the works for this development.

APPROVED

PROPOSED

APPROVED

PROPOSED

2. PROPOSAL

The applicant now seeks to vary the Planning Consent for this development. The applicant lodged the variation application on 3 July 2013 but subsequently amended the plans on 31 October 2013 and 5 March 2014. Additional information was also received on 4 April 2014 and 1 May 2014. The application includes the following variations:

DA 020/0005/12A DA 020/000512A V1 Approval Proposed variation

16 levels - 99.2m AHD 19 levels - 110.5m AHD (67.7m) (56.2m) The additional levels accommodate two new office levels and one apartment level for the penthouse.

The new office levels are set back at the lower levels to maintain the separation between the heritage building and the new structure). More details are provided below.

Reduce the overall height per level (floor to ceiling reduced by 100mm)

Ground floor commercial Ground floor commercial

Minor reconfiguration of waste, bicycle parking, waiting area for car stacker, BCA requirements etc

The columns to the front portion of the building have increased – as they are required to vertically span several floors and the size is needed to accommodate the structural requirements

Changes to the northern wall (discussed below)

4 levels of office 6 levels of office accommodation (levels 1-5) accommodation (levels 1, 2 and 3)

12 residential levels (levels 4 13 residential levels over levels 6 to 18 (includes an additional to 15) level associated with the penthouse, which is a reduced floor plate)

57 apartments 50 apartments

39 car parks 54 car parks (additional spaces located on levels 4 and 5). Level 5 is a split level and also accommodates plant to the western side)

Other works (including Demolition and reconstruction of a portion of the heritage heritage impacts) listed wall along the northern boundary. This is 10.7m in from the eastern boundary, to accommodate an internal structural column. This is not readily visible from the streetscape as it is screened by the building to the north.

Changes to the northern façade have resulted in the removal of the doors to the northern walkway. There is no longer a direct external door for the bike room or the plant room.

The bike room and the refuse room have been reconfigured and also swapped places. The bike room now has a door which directly opens into the vehicle loading area (with a route to Ann St via the north of the car stacker).

Changes to the pedestrian access from the site to Ann Street (the stairs with access to Ann Street are now completely enclosed – presumably as a BCA requirement for fire safety)

14 bike spaces (reserve 40 bike parks are now provided (satisfies reserve matter) matter for 40 spaces)

Plant located on levels 2 & 3 Plant located on level 2 and 5 (level 5 car stacker and plant area is a split level )

Residential started on level 4 Residential starts on level 6

Reconfiguration of apartments between level 6 and 13 to accommodate building services

Level 14 contained 2 two bed Reconfiguration of levels 14 and 15 – now provides 1 four bed apartments and 2 three bed apartment plus study and 2 two bed and 1 one bed (per floor) – apartments (i.e 10 bedrooms equals 9 bedrooms per floor total)

1 penthouse was located on Level 16 comprises 2 four bedroom apartments and a common level 15 pool area

Level 17 and 18 contains 1 three bedroom penthouse over two levels

LOCALITY 69 Light Square, Adelaide

Lot No Street Suburb Hundred CT Reference Lot 9 in FP 102247 69 – 71 Light Square Adelaide Adelaide 6049/730

3. AGENCY COMMENTS DEWNR: Heritage Branch The Heritage Branch consider that the proposal to take down and reconstruct a portion of the historic northern wall to be acceptable for the following reasons.

 The impact on the historic fabric and cultural significance of the place is relatively minor.  Detailed documentation of the works is to be prepared with appropriate input from the proponent’s heritage architect.

DAC is advised that conditions 1, 2, 3 & 4 and reserved matters 2, 3 & 4 (as recommended in their previous advice) are still relevant to the current scheme, and should remain in force. Refer to the previous advice (attached) for details.

The issue of the fourth floor transfer beam included in reserved matter 1 is no longer relevant, so it is recommended that this reserved matter be amended to include only the architectural column/blade elements.

The detail of the northern wall demolition and reconstruction could be appropriately dealt with under reserved matter 3.

Subsequent information On 1 May 2014 the applicant provided additional information with regards to demolition of parts of the heritage structure, to address conditions recommended by DEWNR. The Heritage Branch has not had sufficient time to comment on these plans at the time of writing the report and may be able to provide advice prior to the IMDAC meeting.

Government Architect The Government Architect supports the overall scale, design quality and well considered composition of the proposal. The altered ceiling height of the lower three levels improves the proportion of the proposed structure in relation to the retained heritage structure and neighbouring buildings.

In terms of overall design quality, the additional height is considered as being necessary to achieve good proportions for the proposal overall and to offset the additional bulk required for the supporting columns between the heritage item and the tower above.

No objection is raised with regards to the additional height and its impact in relation to overshadowing.

Adelaide Airport The proposal will penetrate the Adelaide Airport Obstacle Limitation Surface (OLS) by approximately 34.7 metres. The building has a maximum height of 112.9m AHD to the top of plant. However when including the discharge from the gaseous stack the height of the exhaust discharge has been calculated at a height of 116.5m AHD and therefore an OLS infringement of 38.3m.

Air Services has indicated it will give approval of the proposed height and AAL do not object as the proposal is shielded by Westpac Tower and is below PAN-OPS (which is at 165m AHD). CASA do not object but have requirements for obstacle lighting.

Adelaide City Council Background – comments on original application Adelaide City Council’s Development Assessment Panel (DAP) did not support the original application and resolved to inform the DAC that: ‘The Development Assessment Panel is not in a position to provide comments due to insufficient information included in documents referred to Council’. It is noted that the Councils’ staff report to the DAP identified a number of concerns. In the most part these related to traffic, light and ventilation to apartments, boundary setbacks, pedestrian access and public safety. The applicant made a series of amendments and provided additional information in response to these matters. The Council DAP were not given another opportunity to comment on the original proposal. Current Council comments: Council was consulted on the variation application as it was lodged before the referral process was changed last year and still do not support the proposal. They commented on the initial plans lodged and also the amended plans received 31 October 2013. Some of Council’s concerns were addressed with the later plans, however the following issues remain (although it is noted that amendments were made on 5 March 2014 which have responded to some of the following concerns (see italics)– although Council was not given the opportunity to comment again):

 Bicycle storage is not easily accessible (the applicant has made some amendments to improve this – with a new door accessing the vehicle area and also slightly reconfiguring the access from the front of the building).  The location of the refuse bins in Ann Street will further obstruct access along Ann Street, which has not been addressed (no change made)  A number of other matters required clarification (such as who will activate the garage door as this will also be a delivery area / bicycle storage area) (refer to Council’s letter in the file). The applicant has responded to these matters in the letter dated 5 March 2014.

DEVELOPMENT PLAN POLICIES:

Capital City Zone The Capital City Zone encourages a range of uses include commercial, entertainment and medium to high density residential (including serviced apartments) to reinforce the city as a place of diversity and vibrancy, catering for a wide range of user needs across extended hours. The design of residential land uses should ensure a level of compatibility with the essential commercial and leisure functions of the Zone. The maximum height limit prescribed for the site is 53 metres. Buildings higher than the prescribed maximum building height should only occur where they meet one or more criteria, which includes when the proposed building is located on an allotment with frontage to Light Square and/or is within 200 metres of a high concentration public transport route. Buildings should be of a high level of architectural design and finish appropriate to the location of the zone within the city centre. Attention is required to the level of detailing, modelling and articulation of buildings to create visual interest, particularly at lower levels where a sense of pedestrian scale should also be achieved. Development framing Victoria, Hindmarsh and Light Squares are encouraged to provide a continuous edge of medium to high scale built form, creating a desirable sense of enclosure to the important and distinctive landscaped open spaces of the squares. Development of, or adjoining, heritage places should recognise the heritage value of the place and seek innovative and contemporary design solutions to still realise the development potential of the site. Non-residential uses such as shops, offices and educational establishments will occur at ground floor level, with emphasis given to outdoor restaurants and cafes that contribute to the vitality and unique recreational opportunities within the squares. Council Wide The Council Wide Medium to High Scale Residential Development provisions provide guidance as to appropriate levels of private open space, minimum unit sizes and the extent of natural light, ventilation and outlook that should be provided for residential apartments such as those proposed.

The Council Wide provisions also provide direction on the desire for increased levels of activity and interest at ground level, particularly around the Squares; the safe and convenient servicing of sites and access to car parking areas; appropriate forms of development upon and adjacent to Heritage Places; and a high standard of design and appropriate bulk and scale of buildings in regards to adjoining development and overall streetscape. PLANNING ASSESSMENT:

Height / Character The proposed increase in height is approx 11m, now being 67.7m (being 3 additional floor levels). The guide in the Development Plan for height is 53m and therefore the development exceeds this by 14.7m. While this is considered to be a significant increase the policies do allow for increased

height on allotments with a frontage to Light Square and also for developments within 200m of a high concentration transport route. Both of these apply to this site. Given the context of the locality, the proposed design and the policy context, the additional height is considered to be acceptable. The proposed height is acceptable for airport operations.

Overshadowing diagrams have been provided which compare the approved development and the proposed development, with regards to overshadowing impacts. The impacts are considered acceptable, when considering the zoning provisions and the character of the area. There will not be a significant amount of overshading of the Square.

The Desired Character seeks a continuous built form edge around Light Square to create a sense of enclosure to the Square. The proposal continues to achieve this provision.

Design The proposal will result in an increased vertical void above the heritage building and results in amendments to the Light Square elevation. The approved and proposed perspectives are provided. The increased separation between the old and new structures improves the proportion of the proposed structure and is considered to be an improvement to the proposal.

The Government Architect supports the proposed changes and is not opposed to the revised column width. The IMDAC is advised by ODASA that In terms of overall design quality, the additional height is considered as being necessary to achieve good proportions for the proposal overall and to offset the additional bulk required for the supporting columns between the heritage item and the tower above.

Two additional levels of car parking will be provided to the western elevation to an approximate height of 22m (Ann Street). While not desirable, given the context of the locality this is not considered detrimental to the success of the development.

The new design is considered to be acceptable in overall design terms.

Heritage Impacts There are changes to the heritage structure, which involve the demolition and rebuilding of portion of a northern wall. There are also internal changes. The State Heritage Unit has provided its support for the proposal and it is therefore considered acceptable, subject to conditions (some of which require further information to be provided to their satisfaction). The applicant has recently provided additional information with regards to the information required for the recommended conditions, which DEWNR has not had the opportunity to comment on.

Land Uses The increase in office space is considered acceptable and is a supported use within the Zone.

Internal reconfigurations The proposed internal changes are not considered to create any significant issues from a planning perspective. Apartment amenity is still satisfactory. The changes to the heritage structure are also considered acceptable.

It is noted that the access arrangements on the ground floor have changed with the deletion of access to the bike room and waste area from the northern pathway. However given the changes made on 5 March 2014, which allows for a more direct access from Ann Street, the arrangements are now considered acceptable.

Car parking 15 additional car parks are to be provided. There is no maximum or minimum car parking requirements in the Development Plan for the Capital City Zone. However, the Council has objected to the car parking access arrangements and the potential impacts to Ann Street (in line with their concerns with the original application). Notwithstanding this, the vehicle movements

are unlikely to be significantly greater than the original proposal and the additional impacts minimal (refer to the traffic report provided).

There have been changes to the vehicle areas on the ground level to provide a safer environment. This includes a convex mirror to provide sightlines for drivers in the vehicle holding area.

Bicycle parking 40 bicycle spaces are now proposed, which meets the previous reserve matter. It is noted that there are 7 less apartments, although there are also now more office spaces. The applicant has not addressed this with regards to bicycle parking. However on balance the bicycle parking is considered to be acceptable for the amended proposal.

Miscellaneous There are a number of other more minor changes, which are considered to be reasonably insignificant from a planning perspective.

Conclusion The proposed amendments are considered to be an improvement to the overall building design, as it will increase the visual separation distances between the new and old buildings. The heritage Branch has no objection to the proposal, subject to conditions. When considering the application on balance with all the provisions in the Development Plan and the advice received from relevant government agencies, the proposal is considered to be acceptable. The amendments are considered an improvement and the overall assessment of the application has not changed and the proposal is supported by DPTI staffw. The application is NOT seriously at variance with the Development Plan. 5. RECOMMENDATION I recommend that the Development Assessment Commission: 1) RESOLVE that the proposed development is NOT seriously at variance with the policies in the Development Plan. 2) RESOLVE to GRANT Development Plan Consent for Development Application 020/0005/12A Variation 1 by Light Square Investments Pty Ltd for a variation to DA 020/0005/12A for the construction of a nineteen level mixed use development incorporating a State Heritage Place at 69 – 71 Light Square, Adelaide, subject to the following Reserved Matters, conditions and advisory notes :

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – 020/0005/12A Variation 1

RESERVED MATTERS

1. Pursuant to Section 33(3) of the Development Act 1993, the applicant shall submit detailed proposals for the following reserved matters requiring further assessment and approval by the Development Assessment Commission prior to Development Approval of any superstructure stage:

1.1 An acoustic report that considers the potential for noise disturbance upon apartments from plant and equipment venting into the proposed light well.

1.2 Final design and location of the fire booster

1.3 The detailed design of the architectural column/blade elements above the roof plane of the heritage building.

2. The following reserved matters require further assessment and approval by the Development Assessment Commission prior to Development Approval for any demolition works:

1.4 Plans, external elevations and internal elevations of the heritage building showing existing conditions, proposed demolition works and proposed conservation and adaptation works.

Planning Conditions: 1. That except where minor amendments may be required by other relevant Acts, or by conditions imposed by this application, the development shall be established in strict accordance with the details and plans as submitted in development application number 020/0005/12A Variation 1, including the amended plans by Intro titled: Plan Revision Date A200 1 Jan 2014 DA01 1 14/10/13 DA02 14/10/13 DA03 1 14/10/13 DA04 14/10/13 DA05 14/10/13 DA06 14/10/13 DA07 14/10/13 DA08 14/10/13 DD05 March 2014 DA10B 2/4/14 DA10A 2/4/14 DA10C 2/4/14 DA11 2/4/14 DA12 15/4/14 DA13 14/4/14 . Intro Letter dated 31 October 2013 Traffic report by GTA, dated 31 October 2013 (ref 12A1084000) Emails from Intro (Nigel Howden), dated 3 April 2014 and 1 May 2014

Note: Plans and conditions for Development Application 020/005/12A are still applicable, except where varied by this application and the amended plans and the conditions below.

2. That a dilapidation survey recording the condition of the historic building, adjoining buildings and adjacent Council infrastructure shall be prepared by a qualified engineer prior to the commencement of construction works, to the satisfaction of the Development Assessment Commission. The structural condition of the fabric shall be monitored during the course of construction to identify any adverse impacts. A copy of this report shall be provided to the Adelaide City Council.

3. That the extent of historic fabric shall be determined by careful investigation and opening-up prior to the commencement of demolition works. Decisions about fabric to be retained, removed and re-used shall be made in conjunction with the Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources.

4. That non-original doors, windows, sashes and frames in the northern, eastern and southern walls shall be replaced to appropriate historic detail, to the satisfaction of the Development Assessment Commission.

5. That non-original roof vents shall be replaced to appropriate historic detail, to the satisfaction of the Development Assessment Commission.

6. That final details shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Commission prior to the issuing of Development Approval for any superstructure works in regards to:

 the glazed gates to be located on either side of the front façade of the building,  the roller doors and steel mesh at the car parking area and car stacking system at rear of the site, and  landscaping of the front setback and side walkways (including paving treatments and fencing).

7. That the acoustic attenuation measures recommended in the Sonus report, dated April 2012, shall be undertaken within the development to the reasonable satisfaction of the Development Assessment Commission. Such acoustic measures shall be operational prior to the occupation or use of the Development.

8. That mechanical plant or equipment shall be designed, sited and screened to minimise noise impact on adjacent premises or properties. The noise level associated with the combined operation of plant and equipment such as air conditioning, ventilation and refrigeration systems when assessed at the nearest existing or envisaged noise sensitive location in or adjacent to the site shall not exceed:

a. 55 dB(A) during daytime (7.00am to 10.00pm) and 45 dB(A) during night time (10.00pm to 7.00am) when measured and adjusted in accordance with the relevant environmental noise legislation except where it can be demonstrated that a high background noise exists.

9. That the proposed car parking layout and vehicular entry points shall be designed and constructed to conform to the Australian Standard 2890.1:2004 for Off-Street Parking Facilities and Australian Standard 2890.6:2009 for Off Street Parking for people with disabilities.

10. That bicycle parks shall be designed in accordance with Australian Standard 2890.3- 1993 and the AUSTROADS, Guide to Traffic Engineering Practice Part 14 – Bicycles.

11. That the proposal shall be in accordance with the samples and schedules of materials, finishes and colours shall submitted to the Development Assessment Commission.

12. That a Building Site Management Plan is required prior to construction work beginning on site. The Building Site Management Plan should include details of such items as:  Work in the Public Realm  Street Occupation  Hoarding  Site Amenities  Traffic Requirements  Servicing Site  Adjoining Buildings  Reinstatement of Infrastructure

13. That a Construction Environment Management Plan (CEMP) shall be prepared and implemented in accordance with current industry standards – including the EPA publication “Environmental Management of On-site Remediation” - to minimise environmental harm and disturbance during construction. A copy of the CEMP shall be provided to the Development Assessment Commission prior to the commencement of site works.

The management plan must incorporate, without being limited to, the following matters: a. air quality, including odour and dust b. surface water including erosion and sediment control c. soils, including fill importation, stockpile management and prevention of soil contamination d. groundwater, including prevention of groundwater contamination e. noise f. occupational health and safety

For further information relating to what Site Contamination is, refer to the EPA Guideline: 'Site Contamination – what is site contamination?': www.epa.sa.gov.au/pdfs/guide_sc_what.pdf

14. That final details of lighting to the public spaces (including the rear, the front setback and along both sides of the building) shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Development Assessment Commission and prior to the occupation or use of the Development. The lighting to the public realm shall be installed in accordance with Council’s guideline entitled “Under Verandah/Awning Lighting Guidelines”. Such lighting shall be operational during the hours of darkness at all times to the reasonable satisfaction of the Development Assessment Commission.

15. That Council maintained infrastructure that is removed or damaged during construction works shall be reinstated to Council specifications. All costs associated with these works shall be met by the proponent.

16. That the connection of any storm water discharge from the land to any part of the Adelaide City Council’s underground drainage system shall be undertaken in accordance with the Council Policy entitled ‘Adelaide City Council Storm Water Requirements’ to the reasonable satisfaction of the Development Assessment Commission.

Advisory Notes: a) As the applicant is undertaking work on or near the boundary, the applicant should ensure that the boundaries are clearly defined, by a Licensed Surveyor, prior to the commencement of any building work. b) Development Approval will not be granted until Building Rules Consent has been obtained from the Adelaide City Council. A separate application must be submitted for such consent. No building work or change of classification is permitted until the Development Approval has been obtained. c) You are reminded of its general environmental duty, as required by Section 25 of the Environment Protection Act, to take all reasonable and practical measures to ensure that the activities on the whole site, including during construction, do not pollute the environment in a way which causes or may cause environmental harm. d) The applicant must ensure there is no objection from any of the public utilities in respect of underground or overhead services and any alterations that may be required are to be at the applicant’s expense. e) Pursuant to Regulation 74, the Council must be given one business day's notice of the commencement and the completion of the building work on the site. To notify Council, contact City Services on 8203 7332. For further clarification or additional information, please contact the Adelaide City Council Customer Service Centre on 8203 7203.

f) The emission of noise from the premises is subject to control under the Environment Protection Act 1993 and Environment Protection Regulations 2009 and the applicant (or person with the benefit of this consent) should comply with those requirements.

g) Adelaide Airport Limited advise that crane operations are required to be the subject of a separate application, as these are likely to penetrate the OLS. Adelaide Airport Limited with require 60 days notice prior to any crane operations during the construction. Crane assessment may also have to be conducted by the Civil Aviation Authority (CASA).

h) Adelaide Airport Limited advise that restrictions may apply to lighting illumination. Any lighting proposed shall confirm to airport lighting restrictions and shall be shielded from aircraft light paths.

i) You have a right of appeal against the conditions which have been imposed on this Development Plan Consent or Development Approval. Such an appeal must be lodged at the Environment, Resources and Development Court within two months of the day on which you receive this notice or such longer time as the Court may allow. Please contact the Court if you wish to appeal. The Court is located in the Sir Samuel Way Building, Victoria Square, Adelaide (telephone number 8204 0300).

j) The development must be substantially commenced within 12 months of the date of the original approval for Development Application 020/0005/12A, unless this period has been extended by the Development Assessment Commission.

k) The applicant is also advised that any act or work authorised or required by this Notification must be completed within 3 years of the date of the original approval for Development Application 020/0005/12A, unless this period is extended by the Commission.

l) The applicant will require a fresh consent before commencing or continuing the development if unable to satisfy these requirements.

…………………………………………………. Gabrielle McMahon CHIEF PROJECT OFFICER STATUTORY PLANNING BRANCH PLANNING DIVISION (DPTI) c:\users\mcmahog\appdata\roaming\opentext\dm\temp\docs_and_files-#8437747-v1-imdac_item_-_8_may_2014_-_da_020_0005_12a_v1_-_69_light_sqaure_-_id_9116.doc

PERSPECTIVE - SOUTH EAST PERSPECTIVE - NORTH EAST

REV. DESCRIPTION DATE

ORIGINAL BY DATE CREATED DM OCTOBER 2013

CLIENT DIADEM

PROJECT

PALLADIUM ON LIGHT | 69 LIGHT SQUARE | ADELAIDE

DRAWING

PERSPECTIVES

PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER 1201 DA11

ISSUE STATUS ISSUE DATE DA 02/04/14

REVISION STATUS SCALE @ A1

FILE PATH C:\Users\Intro_5\Documents\1201_Light Square_Planning_140402_Dean.rvt

This drawing is to be read in conjunction with all related drawings. Do not scale from this drawing. All dimensions must be checked and verified on site before commencing PERSPECTIVE - EAST any work or producing shop drawings. The originator should be notified immediately of any discrepancy. This drawing is copyright and remains the property of Intro Pty Limited.

31 October 2013

Gabrielle McMahon Chief Planning Officer Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure Roma Mitchell House - 136 North Terrace Adelaide SA 5000

Dear Gabrielle,

RE: Development Application No. 020/0005/12A 69 Light Square, Adelaide

I act for Light Square Investments with respect to the operative Planning Consent over the land at 69 Light Square, Adelaide.

Throughout the ongoing design development process a number of aspects pertaining to the building have been changed to respond to market demand. I note that this proposal seeks changes to the variation application submitted on 7 July, 2013.

The proposed development now seeks further changes to respond to market demand and costing. My client seeks provide additional information to the previous variation by:

- reducing the overall floor to floor height by 100mm across all levels; - incorporating an additional floor level within the overall building footprint; - altering the internal configuration of the apartments on upper levels. This is a response to market demand which requires a larger apartment footprint for the premium apartment stock. The following changes are proposed:

. Level 15 now has one, one bedroom apartment, two, two bedroom apartments and one four bedroom apartment; and . level 16 now has two four bedroom apartments and a common pool area.

It should be noted that the penthouse remains unchanged, however , it is now situated on levels 17 and 18.

- altering the location of the plant room such that is located partly on level 2 and partly on level 5; - reducing the overall height of the building by approximately 1m;

- demolition and reconstruction of a portion of the heritage listed wall along the northern boundary some 10.7m in from the eastern boundary to accommodate an internal structural column. I note that this has had verbal approval from the Heritage Assessment Board; - substituting glazing on the final two levels with concrete panelling matching the lower portions of the facade; and - reducing the total number of apartments to 50.

When comparing the current set of amended plans to the approved development on 15 February, 2013, we seek the following changes:

- increase in total number of floor levels to 19 and building height from some 99.2m AHD to 110.5m AHD; - increase in the number of floor levels from 15 to 19. The additional levels occur in the middle adopting the floor plate of levels 6-13 in the original proposal; - reconfiguration of floors 2, 3, 4, 5 to commercial; - increasing the height of the penthouse by an additional level; - reconfiguration of levels 14 and 15 (levels 12 and 13 in original proposal) floor plans to provide four apartments per level; - reconfiguration of level 16 (level 14 in original proposal) floor plan to provide two apartments; - minor reconfiguration of apartments between level 6 and 13 to accommodate building services; - increase in car parks from 39 to 54; - reduction in total number of apartments to 50; - change in location of plant form levels 2 and 3 to levels 2 and 5; - substituting glazing on the final two levels with concrete panelling matching the lower portions of the facade; and - demolition and reconstruction of a portion of the heritage listed wall along the northern boundary some 10.7m in from the eastern boundary to accommodate an internal structural column. I note that this has had verbal approval from the Heritage Assessment Board.

Please find appended to this correspondence a response to the traffic related queries raised by Adelaide City Council correspondence dated 20 August 2013.

The Adelaide City Council correspondence also requested a supplementary wind modelling report. The increase in total building height is not significant and occurs at the rooftop level. The revised plans reduce the overall building height and the additional height will not impact the microclimate at Light Square.

Please accept this correspondence, in addition to the appended building plans, as further information to the current variation.

Should you wish to discuss any matter further, please contact the undersigned on 84100453 or 0402 424 403.

Yours sincerely

Anthony Gatti Planning Advisor enc: Amended Building Plans Revised Traffic Impact Assessment

5 March 2014

Gabrielle McMahon Chief Planning Officer Department of Planning Transport and Infrastructure via email: [email protected]

Dear Gabrielle,

RE: DA 020/0005/12A - Request for additional information

On behalf of Light Square Investments Pty Ltd, I write in response to your request for additional information received via email on the 25 February, 2014. For ease of reference, I will respond separately to each matter raised:

 The removal of the ground level doors to the north elevation will have an impact on the access to the bike room. The access arrangement to the bike room is now convoluted and not ideal. As it is currently proposed it requires a person to manoeuvre through 4 doors from the east or alternately 4 doors from the west. Alternatively if access was via the roller door from Ann Street then there is a safety issue with conflict motor vehicles and also limited access past the vehicle holding bay. It is also noted that there is a requirement for 40 on-site bicycle spaces to be provided on the ground level (reserve matter1.4). This matter has not yet been addressed.

The proposed development will have relatively few vehicle movements given the limited number of parking spaces. The stacker entry/exit booth will control vehicle movements to very low speed when entering or exiting. Hence, the ability for people to use the rear door access for bicycle access to the bicycle storage area will be acceptable.

The plans indicate that people can manoeuvre through the northern side of the vehicle stacker from Ann Street to the bicycle storage area. Swipe card access has been provided externally for cyclists wanting to enter the area out of hours.

Should residents choose not to access the bicycle storage facilities from Ann Street, they will be required to access the bicycle store from the residential pedestrian entry. The plans have been revised to simplify access routes to the bicycle store.

Additional bicycle spaces have been incorporated in the plan. A total of 40 bicycle car parking spaces are now provided satisfying Reserve Matter 1.4.

 Access to the refuse area has altered and it looks awkward to manoeuvre bins through the doors to Ann Street. Please explain how waste removal will efficiently operate. i.e access to Ann Street (type of bin to be used) and also the collection arrangement from a waste operator.

The refuse area and access has been reconfigured so access and bin removal is more direct through to Ann Street. Bins will now be transported to Ann Street directly through a corridor and the rear garage for collection. The bins used within the bin store are 5x 660L bins and 4x 240L bins. A commercial waste operator will remove waste at a dedicated time, during non-peak times of the day when the car park stacker holding bays will not be in use.

 How will the garage door to Ann Street be activated (i.e tenants only)? Clarification is required as this will impact on the loading and unloading for delivery vehicles. The traffic report identifies delivery vehicles will have access to the rear.

Tenants will be able to activate the garage door through the use of an apartment specific key card. The garage door access point will also contain a number pad which will accept specific pin codes for commercial vehicle access. There is also the potential for delivery vehicles to park in existing designated loading zones within the city street network.

 In your letter you advise that additional plant is to be located on level 5. This does not appear on DA03.

The plant is located above the car park stacker which is in between levels 5 and 6. An additional plan highlighting the mezzanine has been appended to this correspondence for your consideration.

Should you wish to discuss any matter further, please contact the undersigned on 8410 0453 or 0402 359 653.

Yours sincerely

Damien Ellis Director

Attachments: Revised Ground Floor Plan Mezzanine Plan

2 Page 1 of 2

Ç◘⁬ Nigel Howden {ĵ Ľ╨śľĊ⁬ RE: 69 Light Square - IMDAC

From: Nigel Howden [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, 3 April 2014 5:13 PM To: McMahon, Gabrielle (DPTI) Cc: Damien Ellis; Anthony Gatti; Dean McCredden Subject: RE: 69 Light Square - IMDAC

Gabrielle

In response to your e-mail below and request for further information please find attached the following:

 Full set of plans and elevations  3d perspectives (taken from our working model) to communicate the relationship of the heritage and new build at the lower level  3d perspective (professional) showing the building in context  Shadow diagrams

In relation to the columns to the front portion of the building we acknowledge that the size of these has increased. The reasons for this increase firstly relate to the amendments made, as a noted benefit to the proposals, during the approval process and as direct response to comments received from DAC and the Government Architect. As you recall during this process the effective vertical ‘void’ between the existing and the proposed was increased to give the existing building more ‘breathing space’. This effectively means that the front columns are clear vertically spanning seven floors and hence their size has needed to increase to accommodate this relatively challenging structural requirement. Needless to say we have worked tirelessly with the structural engineers to minimise the size of these columns. The ‘fluting’ of these columns remains as per the original proposals and will be achieved through a combination of the main structural column size and a glass reinforced concrete outer skin to achieve the slender tapering form. Within the space of the existing building the structural columns are chamfered to present their slenderest dimension to the main areas – the fluting only begins above the roof line (in accordance with comments made by Peter Wells). A considered balance has been struck between columns which appear too slender and hence appear visually ‘insufficient’ to carry the upper levels and of course structure which overly dominates the existing building.

Secondly the level of detail and resolution we are now at has significantly increased (these sizes are based on structural calculations), compared to the original planning drawings.

We trust the attached is sufficient information but please let us know by return if you require anything further and we will endeavour to provide.

Thanks

Nigel _ _

NIGEL HOWDEN DIRECTOR

[email protected] M +61 (0)467 770 126 T +61 (0)8 8410 0453

file:///C:/Users/mcmahog/Desktop/STUFF/ACC/69%20Ligth%20Sq%20V1/Web%20... 2/05/2014

ANN STREET

CAR STACKER

FIRE EXIT CAR STACKER PARKING

REAR ENTRY BIKE STORE

CLNR

REFUSE STORE

STAIRS 02 STAIRS 02

LIFT FOYER LIFT

STAIRS 01 STAIRS 01 COMMERCIAL TENANCY

1 REVISED GROUND FLOOR PLAN 05.03.14 TENANCY FIT-OUT REV. DESCRIPTION DATE

ORIGINAL BY DATE CREATED DM OCTOBER 2013

MAIN ENTRY

CLIENT DIADEM

PROJECT

PALLADIUM ON LIGHT | 69 LIGHT SQUARE | ADELAIDE VOID

DRAWING

GROUND & LEVEL 01 FLOOR PLANS

PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER 1201 DA01

ISSUE STATUS ISSUE DATE DA 14/10/13 LIGHT SQUARE REVISION STATUS SCALE 1 1 : 100 @ A1

FILE PATH GROUND FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 01 FLOOR PLAN C:\Users\Intro_5\Documents\1201_Light Square_Planning_140402_Dean.rvt 1 : 100 1 : 100

This drawing is to be read in conjunction with all related drawings. Do not scale from this drawing. All dimensions

must be checked and verified on site before commencing N any work or producing shop drawings. The originator should be notified immediately of any discrepancy. This drawing is copyright and remains the property of Intro Pty Limited. Level 1 | 33 Pirie Street | Adelaide | South Australia 5000 +61 8 8410 0453 | [email protected] | www.intro.com.co

CAR STACKER CAR STACKER PARKING PARKING

PLANT ROOM

STAIRS 02 STAIRS 02

LIFT LIFT

STAIRS 01 COMMERCIAL STAIRS 01 COMMERCIAL TENANCY TENANCY

REV. DESCRIPTION DATE

ORIGINAL BY DATE CREATED DM OCTOBER 2013

CLIENT DIADEM

PROJECT

PALLADIUM ON LIGHT | 69 LIGHT SQUARE | ADELAIDE

DRAWING

LEVEL 02 & 03 FLOOR PLANS

PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER 1201 DA02

ISSUE STATUS ISSUE DATE DA 14/10/13

REVISION STATUS SCALE 1 : 100 @ A1

FILE PATH LEVEL 02 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 03 FLOOR PLAN C:\Users\Intro_5\Documents\1201_Light Square_Planning_140402_Dean.rvt 1 : 100 1 : 100

This drawing is to be read in conjunction with all related drawings. Do not scale from this drawing. All dimensions

must be checked and verified on site before commencing N any work or producing shop drawings. The originator should be notified immediately of any discrepancy. This drawing is copyright and remains the property of Intro Pty Limited. Level 1 | 33 Pirie Street | Adelaide | South Australia 5000 +61 8 8410 0453 | [email protected] | www.intro.com.co

CAR STACKER CAR STACKER PARKING PARKING

STAIRS 02 STAIRS 02

LIFT LIFT

STAIRS 01 COMMERCIAL STAIRS 01 COMMERCIAL TENANCY TENANCY

REV. DESCRIPTION DATE

ORIGINAL BY DATE CREATED DM OCTOBER 2013

CLIENT DIADEM

PROJECT

PALLADIUM ON LIGHT | 69 LIGHT SQUARE | ADELAIDE

DRAWING

LEVEL 04 & 05 FLOOR PLANS

PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER 1201 DA03

ISSUE STATUS ISSUE DATE DA 14/10/13

REVISION STATUS SCALE 1 : 100 @ A1

FILE PATH LEVEL 04 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 05 FLOOR PLAN C:\Users\Intro_5\Documents\1201_Light Square_Planning_140402_Dean.rvt 1 : 100 1 : 100

This drawing is to be read in conjunction with all related drawings. Do not scale from this drawing. All dimensions

must be checked and verified on site before commencing N any work or producing shop drawings. The originator should be notified immediately of any discrepancy. This drawing is copyright and remains the property of Intro Pty Limited. Level 1 | 33 Pirie Street | Adelaide | South Australia 5000 +61 8 8410 0453 | [email protected] | www.intro.com.co

APARTMENT APARTMENT APARTMENT APARTMENT 6.3 6.4 7.3, 8.3, 9.3 7.4, 8.4, 9.4

STAIRS 02 STAIRS 02

LIFT LIFT APARTMENT APARTMENT 6.2 7.5, 8.5, 9.5

STAIRS 01 STAIRS 01

REV. DESCRIPTION DATE

ORIGINAL BY DATE CREATED DM OCTOBER 2013

APARTMENT 6.1

APARTMENT APARTMENT CLIENT 7.2, 8.2, 9.2 7.1, 8.1, 9.1 DIADEM

PROJECT

PALLADIUM ON LIGHT | 69 LIGHT SQUARE | ADELAIDE

DRAWING

LEVEL 06 & 07-09 FLOOR PLANS

PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER 1201 DA04

ISSUE STATUS ISSUE DATE DA 14/10/13

REVISION STATUS SCALE 1 : 100 @ A1

FILE PATH LEVEL 06 FLOOR PLAN LEVELS 07-09 FLOOR PLANS C:\Users\Intro_5\Documents\1201_Light Square_Planning_140402_Dean.rvt 1 : 100 1 : 100

This drawing is to be read in conjunction with all related drawings. Do not scale from this drawing. All dimensions

must be checked and verified on site before commencing N any work or producing shop drawings. The originator should be notified immediately of any discrepancy. This drawing is copyright and remains the property of Intro Pty Limited. Level 1 | 33 Pirie Street | Adelaide | South Australia 5000 +61 8 8410 0453 | [email protected] | www.intro.com.co

APARTMENT APARTMENT APARTMENT APARTMENT 10.3, 11.3, 12.3, 13.3 10.4, 11.4, 12.4, 13.4 14.3, 15.3 14.4, 15.4

STAIRS 02 STAIRS 02

LIFT LIFT

APARTMENT APARTMENT 10.5, 11.5, 12.5, 13.5 14.5, 15.5

STAIRS 01 STAIRS 01

REV. DESCRIPTION DATE

ORIGINAL BY DATE CREATED DM OCTOBER 2013

APARTMENT APARTMENT 10.2, 11.2, 12.2, 13.2 10.1, 11.1, 12.1, 13.1 CLIENT DIADEM APARTMENT 14.1, 15.1

PROJECT

PALLADIUM ON LIGHT | 69 LIGHT SQUARE | ADELAIDE

DRAWING

LEVEL 10-13 & 14-15 FLOOR PLANS

PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER 1201 DA05

ISSUE STATUS ISSUE DATE DA 14/10/13

REVISION STATUS SCALE 1 : 100 @ A1

FILE PATH LEVELS 10-13 FLOOR PLANS LEVELS 14-15 FLOOR PLANS C:\Users\Intro_5\Documents\1201_Light Square_Planning_140402_Dean.rvt 1 : 100 1 : 100

This drawing is to be read in conjunction with all related drawings. Do not scale from this drawing. All dimensions

must be checked and verified on site before commencing N any work or producing shop drawings. The originator should be notified immediately of any discrepancy. This drawing is copyright and remains the property of Intro Pty Limited. Level 1 | 33 Pirie Street | Adelaide | South Australia 5000 +61 8 8410 0453 | [email protected] | www.intro.com.co

APARTMENT 16.2

OUTDOOR AREA

STAIRS 02 STAIRS 02 STAIRS 02

POOL AREA

LIFT LIFT LIFT (UPPER LEVEL) APARTMENT 17.1 APARTMENT

STAIRS 01 STAIRS 01 STAIRS 01

REV. DESCRIPTION DATE APARTMENT 17.1 (LOWER LEVEL)

ORIGINAL BY DATE CREATED DM OCTOBER 2013

OUTDOOR AREA

CLIENT DIADEM APARTMENT 16.1

PROJECT

OUTDOOR POOL PALLADIUM ON LIGHT | 69 LIGHT SQUARE | ADELAIDE

DRAWING

LEVEL 16 & 17-18 FLOOR PLANS

PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER 1201 DA06

ISSUE STATUS ISSUE DATE DA 14/10/13

REVISION STATUS SCALE 1 : 100 @ A1

FILE PATH LEVEL 16 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 17 FLOOR PLAN - LOWER LEVEL LEVEL 18 FLOOR PLAN - UPPER LEVEL C:\Users\Intro_5\Documents\1201_Light Square_Planning_140402_Dean.rvt 1 : 100 1 : 100 1 : 100

This drawing is to be read in conjunction with all related drawings. Do not scale from this drawing. All dimensions

must be checked and verified on site before commencing N any work or producing shop drawings. The originator should be notified immediately of any discrepancy. This drawing is copyright and remains the property of Intro Pty Limited. Level 1 | 33 Pirie Street | Adelaide | South Australia 5000 +61 8 8410 0453 | [email protected] | www.intro.com.co

LEVEL 19 ROOF PLANT LEVEL 19 ROOF PLANT 108150 108150

LEVEL 18 LEVEL 18 104950 104950

LEVEL 17 LEVEL 17 100720 100720

LEVEL 16 LEVEL 16 96170 96170

LEVEL 15 LEVEL 15 92970 92970

LEVEL 14 LEVEL 14 89770 89770

LEVEL 13 LEVEL 13 86570 86570

LEVEL 12 LEVEL 12 83370 83370

LEVEL 11 LEVEL 11 80170 80170

LEVEL 10 LEVEL 10 76970 76970

LEVEL 09 LEVEL 09 73770 73770

LEVEL 08 LEVEL 08 70570 70570

LEVEL 07 LEVEL 07 67370 67370

LEVEL 06 LEVEL 06 64170 64170 REV. DESCRIPTION DATE

LEVEL 05 LEVEL 05 60670 60670

LEVEL 04 LEVEL 04 ORIGINAL BY DATE CREATED 57170 57170 DM OCTOBER 2013

LEVEL 03 LEVEL 03 53670 53670

LEVEL 02 LEVEL 02 CLIENT 50170 50170 DIADEM CHURCH ROOF CHURCH ROOF 49440 49440 LEVEL 01 LEVEL 01 46420 46420 PROJECT

PALLADIUM ON LIGHT | 69 LIGHT SQUARE | ADELAIDE

LEVEL GROUND LEVEL GROUND 42830 42830 DRAWING

NORTH & EAST ELEVATIONS

NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION 1 : 200 1 : 200 PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER 1201 DA07

ISSUE STATUS ISSUE DATE DA 14/10/13

REVISION STATUS SCALE 1 : 200 @ A1

FILE PATH C:\Users\Intro_5\Documents\1201_Light Square_Planning_140402_Dean.rvt

This drawing is to be read in conjunction with all related drawings. Do not scale from this drawing. All dimensions must be checked and verified on site before commencing any work or producing shop drawings. The originator should be notified immediately of any discrepancy. This drawing is copyright and remains the property of Intro Pty Limited. Level 1 | 33 Pirie Street | Adelaide | South Australia 5000 +61 8 8410 0453 | [email protected] | www.intro.com.co

LEVEL 19 ROOF PLANT LEVEL 19 ROOF PLANT 108150 108150

LEVEL 18 LEVEL 18 104950 104950

LEVEL 17 LEVEL 17 100720 100720

LEVEL 16 LEVEL 16 96170 96170

LEVEL 15 LEVEL 15 92970 92970

LEVEL 14 LEVEL 14 89770 89770

LEVEL 13 LEVEL 13 86570 86570

LEVEL 12 LEVEL 12 83370 83370

LEVEL 11 LEVEL 11 80170 80170

LEVEL 10 LEVEL 10 76970 76970

LEVEL 09 LEVEL 09 73770 73770

LEVEL 08 LEVEL 08 70570 70570

LEVEL 07 LEVEL 07 67370 67370

LEVEL 06 LEVEL 06 64170 64170

REV. DESCRIPTION DATE LEVEL 05 LEVEL 05 60670 60670

LEVEL 04 LEVEL 04 57170 57170 ORIGINAL BY DATE CREATED DM OCTOBER 2013

LEVEL 03 LEVEL 03 53670 53670

LEVEL 02 LEVEL 02 50170 50170 CLIENT CHURCH ROOF CHURCH ROOF DIADEM 49440 49440 LEVEL 01 LEVEL 01 46420 46420 PROJECT

LEVEL GROUND LEVEL GROUND PALLADIUM ON LIGHT | 69 LIGHT SQUARE | ADELAIDE 42830 42830

DRAWING

SOUTH & WEST ELEVATIONS SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION 1 : 200 1 : 200

PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER 1201 DA08

ISSUE STATUS ISSUE DATE DA 14/10/13

REVISION STATUS SCALE 1 : 200 @ A1

FILE PATH C:\Users\Intro_5\Documents\1201_Light Square_Planning_140402_Dean.rvt

LEVEL 20 110550

2400 LEVEL 19 ROOF PLANT 108150 3200 LEVEL 18 104950

4230 LEVEL 17A 101020 LEVEL 17 100720 4550

LEVEL 16 96170 3200 LEVEL 15 92970 3200 LEVEL 14 89770 3200 LEVEL 13 86570 3200 LEVEL 12 83370 3200 LEVEL 11 80170 3200 LEVEL 10 76970 3200 LEVEL 09 73770 3200 LEVEL 08 70570 3200 LEVEL 07 67370 3200 LEVEL 06 64170 REV. DESCRIPTION DATE 3500 LEVEL 05 60670 3500

LEVEL 04 ORIGINAL BY DATE CREATED 57170 DM OCTOBER 2013 3500 LEVEL 03 53670 3500

LEVEL 02 CLIENT 50170 DIADEM 3750 LEVEL 01 46420 PROJECT

3590 PALLADIUM ON LIGHT | 69 LIGHT SQUARE | ADELAIDE LEVEL GROUND 42830 DRAWING

SECTION

SECTION PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER 1 : 200 1201 DA09

ISSUE STATUS ISSUE DATE DA 02/04/14

REVISION STATUS SCALE 1 : 200 @ A1

FILE PATH C:\Users\Intro_5\Documents\1201_Light Square_Planning_140402_Dean.rvt

This drawing is to be read in conjunction with all related drawings. Do not scale from this drawing. All dimensions must be checked and verified on site before commencing any work or producing shop drawings. The originator should be notified immediately of any discrepancy. This drawing is copyright and remains the property of Intro Pty Limited. A B C D E F G H I J K L A B C D E F G H I J K L Level 1 | 33 Pirie Street | Adelaide | South Australia 5000 +61 8 8410 0453 | [email protected] | www.intro.com.co 15240

200 1250 1215 5535 6200 200

300650 6650 6650 650340 LEGEND CODE DESCRIPTION

BOL BOLLARD, REFER TO SPEC. G.06 FOLD UP DOOR, METAL CLAD, POWDERCOAT COL-C CONCRETE COLUMN, REFER TO ENG'S DETAILS A800 FINISH TO MATCH EXTERNAL ELEVATION. CONC.01 CONCRETE FLOOR TO ENGINEERS SPECIFICATION. DOOR AS SPECIFIED RL 42.430 D.G.4 .

1 0 1

FOLD UP DOOR 6

MAINS GAS - REFER 0 D.G.5 4 G.05 TO ENGR'S DETAILS 5

RL 2 2980

0 42.580 A800 8

0 1

9 CEILING TYPE SCHEDULE 00 :

1 CONC.01 P TYPE DESCRIPTION

P 5600

2 M 2

1225 A CONC.01 AL.01 ALUCOBOND CLADDING FIXED TO FURRING CHANNEL . WT.13 R CT.01 MF CEILING TILES

WT.20 6 PB.01 13mm PLASTERBOARD CEILING-PAINT FINSH

0 CAR SPACE LOADING CAR SPACE LOADING CAR STACKER 3 PB.02 2x 16mm FIRE RATED PLASTERBOARD ZONE ZONE G.8 SPACE SPACE WT.20 2.6 X 5.4 2.6 X 5.4

: 5

P RL 42.830

P 8135

M F-F 5535 2 F-F WALL TYPE SCHEDULE

R A401 CAR CABIN A401 TYPE DESCRIPTION BOL BOL BOL 9660 CAR STACKER PIT REFER WT.01 ALUCOBOND 70mm DARK FIRE EXIT TO ENGRS DETAILS STEADYRACK WALL MOUNT BIKE RACKS AS WT.02 ALUCOBOND 162mm LIGHT GREY G.9 PAINTED LINE MARKING SPECIFIED 22@350 CTRS WT.03 ALUCOBOND 175mm DARK GREY SAFETY YELLOW WITH WT.04 ALUCOBOND 125mm LIGHT GREY 'KEEP CLEAR' SIGNAGE WT.13 WT.05 ALUCOBOND 111mm LIGHT GREY 1000mm OPENING IN 5 7 WT.06 ALUCOBOND 140mm LIGHT GREY + 13mm PB SHEAR WALL TO BE MIN. 5 2275 1500mm FROM EDGE 4 WT.07 ALUCOBOND 50mm DARK GREY

5 190 WT.08 INT - CURTAIN WALL 900mm 0 D.G.15

4 G.04 WT.21 G.07 WT.09 INT - CURTAIN WALL 1500mm

O 0 A800 WT.10 30mm ALUMINIUM U CHANNEL - GLASS 10-12mm

1 A800 O 1775

D . D.G.12 ELECT MSB WT.11 30mm TOILET PARTITION

0 0 WT.12 CONCRETE BLOCK CORE FILLED 190mm

5 5 290 D.G.13 2 2 WT.13 CONCRETE BLOCK CORE FILLED HONED FINISHED 190mm

0 3

D.G.13 5

2 WT.15 CONCRETE PRECAST PANEL 140mm 3 REAR ENTRY STEADYRACK WALL BIKE STORE 1000 1500 WT.16 CONCRETE PRECAST PANEL 125mm G.7 MOUNT BIKE RACKS AS G.6 1 WT.17 CONCRETE BLOCK 190mm + 70mm ALUCOBOND SPECIFIED 18@500 CTRS WT.20 1650 PB.01 WT.18 CONCRETE INSITU 300mm DARK GREY 3415 G.08 2700 WT.19 CONCRETE BLOCK 190mm + 10mm RENDER WT.20 CONCRETE PRECAST PANEL 200mm A800 0 WT.21 CONCRETE INSITU 250mm

CLEANER STORE & SINK 1 5 WT.22 EXISTING STONE WALL 600mm WITH CHAIN MESH 6 4 D.G.11 4 WT.25 CONCRETE INSITU 300mm D.G.10 CLNR FENCE AND GATE TO WT.30 INT - LOUVRE WALL METAL E-E UNDERSIDE CONC. SLAB E-E REFUSE STORE G.4 WT.31 STUD STEEL 76mm - 13mm PB / 10mm WA PB + 10mm D.G.14 2000 METALINE A401 G.13 G.3 A401 STAIR 02 WT.32 STUD STEEL 76mm - 2x 16mm FS PB 5 A801 5 WT.33 STUD STEEL 92mm - 10mm WA PB + 10mm TILE 54 MAIL BOXES54 MAIL G.09 WT.40 PB 13mm DIRECT STICK

2 WT.41 STUD STEEL 92mm - 13mm PB

D.G.14 A801 9 1 WT.42 STUD STEEL 92mm - 13mm PB / 10mm WA PB + 10mm TILE

2650 WT.43 STUD STEEL 92mm - 13mm PB / 13mm PB 40900 LIFT WT.44 STUD STEEL 76mm - 13mm PB / 13mm PB . WT.12 W.EX.04 G.14 L G.12 WT.45 STUD STEEL 76mm - 10mm WA PB / 13mm PB CO A801 WT.46 STUD STEEL 76mm - 13mm PB 6 A801 COL-C 6

5 WT.47 STUD STEEL 76mm - 13mm PB / 10mm WA PB + 10mm

4 2 0 FOYER METALINE 5 G.10 G.2 G.11 A505 WT.48 BORAL PARTITION 150mm - SS16F1316F13 A801 WT.49 STUD STEEL 76mm - 10mm PB / 10mm PB A801 LIFT WT.50 BORAL PARTITION 254mm - ST1616F10 WT.52 STUD STEEL 92mm - 10mm TILE + 10mm WA PB / 10mm WA

4500 PB + 10mm TILE WT.53 10mm WET AREA LINING + 10mm METALINE WT.54 STUD STEEL 76mm - 10mm WA PB / 10mm WA PB + 10mm WT.08 01 METALINE WT.55 STUD STEEL 92mm - 10mm WA PB / 13mm PB A902 COL-C STAIR 01 WT.56 STUD STEEL 76mm - 10mm WA PB / 13mm WA PB 7 7 WT.57 STUD STEEL 76mm - 10mm WA PB / 10mm WA PB VOID 02 CG.01 WT.58 STEEL MESH CURTAIN 50mm PB.01 A902 2700

CONCRETE STRUCTURAL WALL RE-INSTATE STONE ALL 5

1 8 WITH TRIANGULAR DIAGONAL AND EXISTING WINDOWS

6 STEEL FRAMED OPENINGS. WALL REFER TO ENGRS DETAILS. WT.41 D-D D-D 4890 A401 A401 G.03 A800

D.G.9 COL-C

0 D.G.7

8 0 8 2 D.G.8 1 A505 MAIN ENTRY 4 G.1 D.G.6 A902

4410 G.02 A800 TIMBER AND STEEL FEATURE STAIR.

9 FOLDED PERFORATED METAL, GLASS

1 C-C AND HARDWOOD TIMBER TREADS C-C A401 A401 9 W.EX.14 W.EX.01 9 REMOVE AND MAKE GOOD EXISTING WINDOWS IN ACCORDANCE WITH 1 REVISED LAYOUT 07.03.14 HERITAGE CONSULTANTS WT.41 No. DESCRIPTION DATE UP SPECIFICATION AND NOTES WT.22

3395 3395 CLIENT SELECTED PAVING DIADEM COL-C COL-C

PRECAST CONCRETE PROJECT 10 TAPERED COLUMN . REFER 1 10 PALLADIUM ON LIGHT APARTMENTS G.01 TO ENG AND DETAIL DWGS. A903 A800 D.G.02 69 LIGHT SQUARE | ADELAIDE

L L C C D.G.03 WT.41 SECURE DOOR 3000 3000

0 DRAWING

1 1 LEVEL GROUND FLOOR PLAN + D.G.01 11 11 REFLECTED CEILING PLAN 1550 GLASS ENTRY DOOR WITH PROJECT NUMBER DATE INTEGRATED ACCESS WT.22 1201 JAN 2014 CONTROL LOCK ALFRESCO DINING

11920 A-A B-B DRAWN BY SCALE A400 A400 CM 1 : 100 @ A1

REVISION DRAWING NUMBER A-A HERITAGE NOTE 1 A200 B-B MAKE GOOD TO EXISTING WALLS, WINDOWS AND A400 FOOTINGS AS IDENTIFIED AND DIRECTED BY A400 FILE PATH HERITAGE ARCHITECT. REFER TO DRAWINGS AND C:\Users\Intro_5\Documents\1201_Light Square A13_Dean.rvt SPECIFICATION FOR TREATMENT & METHOD OF REPAIR OF EXISTING ELEMENTS AND FOR NEW MORPHETT ST WORK ASSOCIATED WITH THE EXISTING BUILDING This drawing is to be read in conjunction with all related drawings. Do not scale from this drawing. All dimensions must

be checked and verified on site before N 1 LEVEL GROUND FLOOR PLAN 2 LEVEL GROUND RCP commencing any work or producing shop drawings. The originator should be notified immediately of any discrepancy. 1 : 100 1 : 100 This drawing is copyright and remains

LEGEND

LINE INDICATES PREVIOUS SCHEME SHADOW

REV. DESCRIPTION DATE

ORIGINAL BY DATE CREATED DM OCTOBER 2013

CLIENT DIADEM

PROJECT

PALLADIUM ON LIGHT | 69 LIGHT SQUARE | ADELAIDE

DRAWING

SHADOW DIAGRAMS

PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER 1201 DA10A

SHADOW DIAGRAM 9AM (WINTER SOLSTICE 21st JUN) SHADOW DIAGRAM 9AM (SUMMER SOLSTICE 22nd DEC) ISSUE STATUS ISSUE DATE 1 : 1000 1 : 1000 DA 02/04/14

REVISION STATUS SCALE 1 : 1000 @ A1

FILE PATH C:\Users\Intro_5\Documents\1201_Light Square_Planning_140402_Dean.rvt

This drawing is to be read in conjunction with all related drawings. Do not scale from this drawing. All dimensions

must be checked and verified on site before commencing N any work or producing shop drawings. The originator should be notified immediately of any discrepancy. This drawing is copyright and remains the property of Intro Pty Limited. Level 1 | 33 Pirie Street | Adelaide | South Australia 5000 +61 8 8410 0453 | [email protected] | www.intro.com.co

LEGEND

LINE INDICATES PREVIOUS SCHEME SHADOW

REV. DESCRIPTION DATE

ORIGINAL BY DATE CREATED DM OCTOBER 2013

CLIENT DIADEM

PROJECT

PALLADIUM ON LIGHT | 69 LIGHT SQUARE | ADELAIDE

DRAWING

SHADOW DIAGRAMS

PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER 1201 DA10B SHADOW DIAGRAM 12PM (WINTER SOLSTICE 21st JUN) SHADOW DIAGRAM 12PM (SUMMER SOLSTICE 22nd DEC) ISSUE STATUS ISSUE DATE 1 : 1000 1 : 1000 DA 01/05/14

REVISION STATUS SCALE 1 : 1000 @ A1

FILE PATH C:\Users\Intro_5\Documents\1201_Light Square_Planning_140402_Dean.rvt

This drawing is to be read in conjunction with all related drawings. Do not scale from this drawing. All dimensions

must be checked and verified on site before commencing N any work or producing shop drawings. The originator should be notified immediately of any discrepancy. This drawing is copyright and remains the property of Intro Pty Limited. Level 1 | 33 Pirie Street | Adelaide | South Australia 5000 +61 8 8410 0453 | [email protected] | www.intro.com.co

LEGEND

LINE INDICATES PREVIOUS SCHEME SHADOW

REV. DESCRIPTION DATE

ORIGINAL BY DATE CREATED DM OCTOBER 2013

CLIENT DIADEM

PROJECT

PALLADIUM ON LIGHT | 69 LIGHT SQUARE | ADELAIDE

DRAWING

SHADOW DIAGRAMS

PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER 1201 DA10C

SHADOW DIAGRAM 3PM (WINTER SOLSTICE 21st JUN) SHADOW DIAGRAM 3PM (SUMMER SOLSTICE 22nd DEC) ISSUE STATUS ISSUE DATE 1 : 1000 1 : 1000 DA 01/05/14

REVISION STATUS SCALE 1 : 1000 @ A1

FILE PATH C:\Users\Intro_5\Documents\1201_Light Square_Planning_140402_Dean.rvt

This drawing is to be read in conjunction with all related drawings. Do not scale from this drawing. All dimensions

must be checked and verified on site before commencing N any work or producing shop drawings. The originator should be notified immediately of any discrepancy. This drawing is copyright and remains the property of Intro Pty Limited. Level 1 | 33 Pirie Street | Adelaide | South Australia 5000 +61 8 8410 0453 | [email protected] | www.intro.com.co

BOUNDARY 15240MM

EXISTING/DEMOLITION LEGEND

EXISTING TO REMAIN

EXISTING TO REMAIN EXISTING FACADE TO REMAIN, WORKS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH HERTITAGE AND COUNCIL GUIDELINES EXISTING TO BE DEMOLISHED

W.EX.08 EXISTING BUILDING W.EX.07 CONC. GROUND FLOOR TIMBER FLOOR MEZZANINE AND OFFICE FLOORS

DEMOLISH EXISTING EXIT STAIRS

DEMOLISH EXISTING STONE AND BRICK WALL

W.EX.09 W.EX.06 DEMOLISH EXISTING REAR PART OF BUILDING EXIT STAIR TO BE DEMOLISHED DEMOLISH AND REMOVE EXISTING GROUND FLOOR CONCRETE SLAB, MEZZANINE AND OFFICE TIMBER FLOORS AND ALL INTERIOR STUD WALLS TO ALL LEVELS. REMAINING STONE WALL SHELL TO BE PROPPED. REFER EXISTING/DEMOLITION WEST ELEVATION TO ENGINEER'S DETAILS FOR PROPPING. EXISTING/DEMOLITION EAST ELEVATION 1 : 100 1 : 100

W.EX.10 W.EX.05

EXISTING SECTION OF ROOF TO BE EXISTING ROOF TO BE DEMOLISH EXISTING PORTION OF WALL EXTG BRICK PIER EXISTING BRICK/BLUESTONE NIB TO REMAIN REPLACED WITH NEW CORRUGATED ROOF DEMOLISHED AND RETAIN DURING NEW WORKS. WALL COLUMNS TO BE SHEETING, EXISTING ROOF VENTS TO TO BE RE-BUILT IN ACCOARDANCE WITH DEMOLISHED BE RE-INSTALLED HERTITAGE AND COUNCIL GUIDELINES

1 DA13

W.EX.11 W.EX.04

REMAINING WALL TO BE PROPPED. REFER TO ENGR'S DETAILS FOR PROPPING. BOUNDARY 45110MM BOUNDARY 45110MM BOUNDARY X X E L. E L. CO W.EX.12 CO W.EX.03 REMOVE EXISTING HERITAGE REMOVE EXISTING HERITAGE WINDOWS AND RETAIN FOR WINDOWS AND RETAIN FOR EXISTING WINDOW TO BE REMOVE EXISTING HERITAGE EXISTING WINDOW FUTURE REUSE FUTURE REUSE REMOVED, RETAINED & WINDOWS AND RETAIN FOR TO BE REMOVED, REPAIRED THEN RE-INSTALLED FUTURE REUSE. WINDOWS TO BE RETAINED & OUTLINE OF MEZZANINE VOID REPAIRED THEN RE-INSTALLED REPAIRED THEN SHOWN DASHED RE-INSTALLED

DEMOLISH EXISTING PORTION OF WALL AND RETAIN DURING NEW WORKS. WALL TO BE RE-BUILT IN ACCOARDANCE WITH HERTITAGE AND COUNCIL GUIDELINES X EX . E L. L & REBUILD DEMOLISH EXISTING PART OF BUILDING TO REMAIN DEMOLISHED PART OF BUILDING CO CO REMOVE TIMBER FRAMES AND EXISTING GLAZING FROM ALL WINDOWS. RETAIN W.EX.13 W.EX.02 FOR REUSE REV. DESCRIPTION DATE EXISTING/DEMOLITION NORTH ELEVATION REMOVE EXISTING TIMBER TRUSSES AND 1 : 100 ROOF. RETAIN TRUSSES FOR FUTURE REUSE. ENSURE THE TRUSSES ARE KEPT BUILDER TO CONFIRM EXACT DRY AND STORED OFF THE GROUND. 2 EXTENT OF DEMOLITION ON SITE WITH DESIGNER PRIOR TO ORIGINAL BY DATE CREATED DA13 COMMENCING WORK BUILDER TO CONFIRM EXACT DM OCTOBER 2013 EXTENT OF DEMOLITION ON SITE WITH DESIGNER PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK EXISTING ROOF TO BE EXISTING SECTION OF ROOF TO X X E L E L. DEMOLISHED BE REPLACED WITH NEW CO CO CORRUGATED ROOF SHEETING W.EX.14 W.EX.01

C DA13 A CLIENT DEMOLISH EXISTING STAIRCASE. APPROX. LOCATION SHOWN. DIADEM B EXTENT OF WALL TO BE RETAINED

GENERAL NOTES PROJECT

REMOVE, RETAIN AND REPAIR ALL TIMBER PALLADIUM ON LIGHT | 69 LIGHT SQUARE | ADELAIDE WINDOWS FOR FUTURE REUSE KEEP DRY AND STORE OFF THE GROUND

REFER TO ENGR'S DRAWINGS FOR TREATMENT, AND DRAWING EXTENT OF EXISTING FOOTINGS AND PROPPING OF REMOVE EXISTING DOOR EXISTING WALLS EXISTING CONDITIONS

REFER TO HERITAGE CONSULTANTS DWGS AND SPECIFICATION FOR NOTES REGARDING REMOVAL EXISTING WINDOW TO BE DEMOLISH EXISTING DEMOLISH UPPER LEVEL OFFICE AND OF AND FIXING TO WALLS AND EXCAVATION WORKS REMOVED, RETAINED & DWARF WALLS TIMBER STAIRCASE ABOVE REPAIRED THEN RE- PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER MEZZANINE TOILETS BUILDER TO ALLOW TO REMOVE EXISTING INSTALLED INVESTIGATIVE WORKS DEBRIS FROM SITE 1201 DA12

BOUNDARY 15240MM ISSUE STATUS ISSUE DATE REMOVE EXISTING PAVERS AND BASE TO NORTH, EASTERN AND DA 15/04/14 SOUTHERN AREAS DEMOLISHED PART OF BUILDING EXISTING PART OF BUILDING TO REMAIN

REVISION STATUS SCALE EXISTING/DEMOLITION GROUND FLOOR PLAN EXISTING/DEMOLITION SOUTH ELEVATION 1 : 100 @ A1 1 : 100 1 : 100 FILE PATH C:\Users\Intro_5\Documents\1201_Light Square_Planning_140402_Dean.rvt

This drawing is to be read in conjunction with all related drawings. Do not scale from this drawing. All dimensions

must be checked and verified on site before commencing N any work or producing shop drawings. The originator should be notified immediately of any discrepancy. This drawing is copyright and remains the property of Intro Pty Limited. EXISTING SECTION OF ROOF TO BE REPLACED WITH NEW CORRUGATED ROOF SHEETING, EXISTING ROOF VENTS TO Level 1 | 33 Pirie Street | Adelaide | South Australia 5000 BE RE-INSTALLED TO APPROVAL OF HERITAGE CONSULTANT +61 8 8410 0453 | [email protected] | www.intro.com.co MORPHETT ST GENERAL NOTE EAST ELEVATION DEMOLISH EXISTING CONCRETE SLAB, MEZZANINE FLOOR, STAIRS, UPPER FLOOR OFFICE, INTERNAL LINED WALLS AND ROOF. RETAIN ROOF TRUSSES FOR REUSE. PROPOSED NEW EXTENT OF EXISTING WALL TO BE REMOVED. CONFIRM ALL SERVICES TO BE REMOVED. REFER TO CONSULTANTS BLOCKWORK WALL EXISTING/DEMOLITION LEGEND EXACT EXTENT ON SITE WITH DESIGNER DETAILS FOR EXTENT OF SERVICES DEMOLITION MAKE GOOD EXISTING STONE WALLS IN ACCORDANCE WITH HERTITAGE RECOMENDATIONS EXISTING TO REMAIN

EXISTING TO REMAIN

SOUTH ELEVATION EXISTING TO BE DEMOLISHED

NEW STUD WALL WITH INTERNAL INSULATION DEMOLISH EXISTING ROOF, TRUSSES, TIMBER AND PLASTERBOARD MEZZANINE AND FLOOR STRUCTURE LINING

1 PLAN DETAIL 1 DA12 1 : 20

EXTENT OF EXISTING WALL TO BE DEMOLISH EXISTING ROOF REMOVED. CONFIRM EXACT EXTENT ON SITE WITH DESIGNER

EXTENT OF EXISTING WALL TO BE REMOVED AND RE-BUILT CONFIRM EXACT EXTENT ON SITE WITH NEW WALL TO ENTRY DESIGNER. EXISTING WINDOWS TO BE RETAINED ON SITE TO BE RE-USED

STEEL PLATE CAPPING TO END OF EXISTING STONE WALL. POWDERCOAT NORTH ELEVATION PAINTED GREY IN COLOUR

EXISTING STONE WALL EXTENT OF EXISTING WALL TO BE REMOVED. CONFIRM EXACT EXTENT ON SITE WITH DESIGNER

2 PLAN DETAIL 2 DA12 1 : 20

EXISTING/DEMOLITION - AXONOMETRIC

ANN ST WEST ELEVATION REV. DESCRIPTION DATE

ORIGINAL BY DATE CREATED DM OCTOBER 2013

REMOVE EXISTING TIMBER TRUSSES REMOVE EXISTING TRUSSES AND ROOF, RETAIN TRUSSES

CLIENT REMOVE EXISTING REMOVE EXISTING TIMBER TRUSSES AND REMOVE EXISTING TIMBER TRUSSES AND TRUSSES ROOF. RETAIN TRUSSES FOR FUTURE ROOF. RETAIN TRUSSES FOR FUTURE DIADEM REUSE. ENSURE THE TRUSSES ARE KEPT REUSE. ENSURE THE TRUSSES ARE KEPT DRY AND STORED OFF THE GROUND. DRY AND STORED OFF THE GROUND.

PROJECT

PALLADIUM ON LIGHT | 69 LIGHT SQUARE | ADELAIDE

EXISTING WINDOW TO BE REMOVE EXISTING HERITAGE EXISTING WINDOW TO BE REMOVED, RETAINED & WINDOWS AND RETAIN FOR REMOVED, RETAINED & EXISTING WINDOW TO BE REMOVE EXISTING REMOVED, RETAINED & WINDOWS REPAIRED THEN RE-INSTALLED FUTURE REUSE. WINDOWS TO BE REPAIRED THEN RE-INSTALLED DRAWING REPAIRED THEN RE-INSTALLED REPAIRED THEN RE-INSTALLED EXISTING WINDOWS TO REMAIN EXISTING CONDITIONS

PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER 1201 DA13

ISSUE STATUS ISSUE DATE DA 15/04/14 REMAINING WALL TO BE DEMOLISH EXISTING PORTION OF WALL EXISTING MEZZANINE AND EXISTING FLOOR STRUCTURE EXISTING MEZZANINE AND EXISTING FLOOR STRUCTURE PROPPED. REFER TO ENGR'S AND RETAIN DURING NEW WORKS. WALL STRUCTURE TO BE DEMOLISHED TO BE DEMOLISHED EXISTING MEZZANINE AND EXISTING FLOOR STRUCTURE STRUCTURE TO BE DEMOLISHED TO BE DEMOLISHED DETAILS FOR PROPPING. TO BE RE-BUILT IN ACCOARDANCE WITH STRUCTURE TO BE DEMOLISHED TO BE DEMOLISHED HERTITAGE AND COUNCIL GUIDELINES REVISION STATUS SCALE As indicated @ A1 EXISTING/DEMOLITION INTERNAL ELEVATION A EXISTING/DEMOLITION INTERNAL ELEVATION B EXISTING/DEMOLITION INTERNAL ELEVATION C 1 : 100 1 : 100 1 : 100 FILE PATH C:\Users\Intro_5\Documents\1201_Light Square_Planning_140402_Dean.rvt

This drawing is to be read in conjunction with all related drawings. Do not scale from this drawing. All dimensions

HERITAGE ADVICE

GOVERNMENT ARCHITECT ADVICE

Page 1 of 1

Ç◘⁬ Mackay, Kirsteen (DPTI) {ĵ Ľ╨śľĊ⁬ 1201_69 Light Square_Shadow Studies / Heritage

From: Mackay, Kirsteen (DPTI) Sent: Friday, 2 May 2014 11:45 AM To: McMahon, Gabrielle (DPTI) Cc: Snape, Diana (DPTI) Subject: 1201_69 Light Square_Shadow Studies / Heritage

Hi Gabrielle,

In response to the additional information supplied relating to 69 Light Square, and acting on behalf of Ben in his absence, I am comfortable with the additional height and its impact in relation to overshadowing.

In terms of overall design quality, I support the additional height as being necessary to achieve good proportions for the proposal overall and to offset the additional bulk required for the supporting columns between the heritage item and the tower above.

I understand this proposal will be in front of IMDAC on 8th May, please advise ODASA if you will require a statement from the Government Architect at that meeting as Ben will not be able to attend the meeting.

Regards,

Kirsteen

Kirsteen Mackay Associate Government Architect

Office for Design and Architecture SA 26-28 Leigh Street Adelaide SA 5000

Phone +61(0)8 8402 1976 Mobile +61(0)418 983 994 Email [email protected]

file:///C:/Users/mcmahog/Desktop/STUFF/ACC/69%20Ligth%20Sq%20V1/Web%20... 2/05/2014

COUNCIL ADVICE

APPROVED PLANS – 15 FEBRUARY 2013