DOCSLIB.ORG

World of Tanks T-34 Preview

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
World of Tanks T-34 Preview MEDIUM TANK BATTALION BATTALION OF HEAVY & MEDIUM TANKS Organization Chart 010/16 of June 9, 1940 Organization Chart 010/67 of August 14, 1941 HQ BATTALION COMMAND TANKS HEAVY TANK COMPANY КV TANK COMPANY (3 PER BATTALION) T-34 COMPANY COMMANDER’S TANK TANK PLATOON TANK PLATOON COMPANY COMMANDER’S TANK MAINTENANCE & RECOVERY TANK COMPANY TANK COMPANY TANK COMPANY SQUAD MEDIUM TANK COMPANY (3 PER BATTALION) T-34 COMPANY COMMANDER’S TANK TANK PLATOON TANK PLATOON TANK PLATOON 1 2 3 HQ PLATOON COMMAND & CONTROL ELEMENT 1 2 LS_WoT02_T-34_C2-C3_170119.indd 1 1/20/17 5:53 PM MEDIUM TANK BATTALION BATTALION OF HEAVY & MEDIUM TANKS Organization Chart 010/16 of June 9, 1940 Organization Chart 010/67 of August 14, 1941 HQ BATTALION COMMAND TANKS HEAVY TANK COMPANY КV TANK COMPANY (3 PER BATTALION) T-34 COMPANY COMMANDER’S TANK TANK PLATOON TANK PLATOON COMPANY COMMANDER’S TANK MAINTENANCE & RECOVERY TANK COMPANY TANK COMPANY TANK COMPANY SQUAD MEDIUM TANK COMPANY (3 PER BATTALION) T-34 COMPANY COMMANDER’S TANK TANK PLATOON TANK PLATOON TANK PLATOON 1 2 3 HQ PLATOON COMMAND & CONTROL ELEMENT 1 2 LS_WoT02_T-34_C2-C3_170119.indd 1 1/20/17 5:53 PM ©️ 2013, A. Ulanov and D. Shein, and ©️ 2017, Wargaming World, Ltd. - Published by LombardyStudios.com LS_WOT02_T-34_170119.indb 1 1/19/17 6:32 PM The T-34 Goes to War Copyright © 2013, A. Ulanov and D. Shein. English translation © 2017, Wargaming World, Ltd. PUBLISHER’S PREFACE World of Tanks is a trademark of Wargaming World, Ltd. All rights reserved. his is the second book in the World of Tanks series that has been translated from the All opinions expressed in this series are the authors’ and do not represent the views of Wargaming World, Ltd., original Russian edition and made available in English. These books are an outgrowth Wargaming.net, Lombardy Studios, or any of their staff or employees. Tof Wargaming.net’s massive, multiplayer online game World of Tanks. At the time this No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without prior written permission of book was published, World of Tanks had more than 80 million registered players worldwide. the copyright holders, except in the case of brief quotations for reviews. There are two reasons why these books are important to readers interested in World Lombardy Studios War Two (the Great Patriotic War to Russians) and the armored fighting vehicles (AFV) that English Edition Series Managing Editor: Dana Lombardy were the breakthrough weapons of that conflict: English Edition Production: Mark Schumann • Russian documents, photos, and archival materials never before seen by outsiders Index: Cindy Coan were accessed to learn about the design, procurement, development, manufacturing, Wargaming.net and combat employment of Soviet AFV before and during World War Two; Director of Product Vision: Chris Keeling • English readers now get this information through the eyes and opinions of Russian Special Projects and Research Manager: Michael Buonagurio English Edition Editor: Christopher J. Parker researchers—which is why we added the obvious descriptor The Russian View to Russian to English translation services by LanguageTran.com this series. Additional Translations: Egor Buzayev There are three categories of books: Combat Service (such as this T-34 book); Con- Russian Edition struction and Development; and Military Operations. Series Development and Artistic Editor: M. Levykin Andrei Ulanov and Dmitry Shein, the authors of this book about the T-34’s pre-war de- Edited by: G. Pernavsky velopment and combat service in 1941, uncovered fascinating facts and the mystery of why Cover Design: V. Petelin Color Sidebars Authored by: A. Aksenov such a revolutionary design, far ahead of anything the invading German armies fielded, did Diagrams and Color Illustrations by: P. Shitkin so poorly in many of its first battles: Layout Editor: I. Petrovskaya • The T-34’s birth date of 19 December 1939, an advanced design intended to replace Layout: R. Yeremeyev Proofreaders: A. Baskakova and S. Kireyeva the numerous BT series as the “tank of independent mechanized units” • Trials of the first two T-34 prototypes in January 1940 and subsequent field tests The quality of some illustrations is that of the archival source material. exposed flaws in the turret, vision devices, and sights; a radio that often failed; and a The book includes documentation, photography, and illustrations from the Central Archive of the Ministry V-2 diesel engine that did not guarantee 100 hours of operational reliability of Defense of the Russian Federation (TsAMO RF), Russian State Military Archive (RGVA), the Russian State • Instead of 5–6 rounds per minute, the actual “deliverable” average rate of fire was Archive of the Economy, the private collection of Yuri Pasholok, and the Nemirov 41 project. only 2 rounds per minute, partly due to the restricted view from the tank The authors wish to express their deep gratitude for materials provided by Yu. I. Pasholok, A. Yu. Makarov, A. • Constant breakdowns occurred due to minor and major failures of the first mass- V. Isayev, and members of the military history forums RKKA and Nemirov 41—tankovyye srazheniya leta 1941 produced parts and systems goda [Nemirov 41—tank battles of the summer of 1941], and the International Military Forum, without whose • The first “thirty-fours” did not reach Red Army front line units until April 1941, barely invaluable assistance this book could not have been written. two months before the German Wehrmacht attacked the Soviet Union • Rapid expansion of the Red Army armored force and a lack of manuals and training For worldwide distribution except in the CIS (countries of the former Soviet Union) contact: time led to poorly skilled tank commanders and T-34 crews in June 1941 Casemate Book Distributors, 1950 Lawrence Road, Havertown, PA 19083-1709 610-853-9131 • The most widely used German antitank gun—the small 37 mm PAK 36—proved lethal www.casematepublishing.com to the T-34 while leaving almost no significant mark of damage This World of Tanks series provides English readers of World War Two history with First North American Edition published by: Lombardy Studios, 835 8th Avenue, Oakland, California 94606-3608 U.S.A. a much better understanding and greater appreciation of Soviet AFV development and www.WorldofTanksBooks.com operations. I am extremely fortunate to be able to offer these innovative books for the first time in English. Library of Congress Control Number 2015953843 featuring the art and graphics of ISBN (Print) 978-1-940169-03-3 Copyright ©2017 Dana Lombardy ISBN (eBook) 978-1-940169-09-5 Copyright ©2017 Lombardy Studios ® Printed in China. March 2016 iii LS_WOT02_T-34_170119.indb 3 1/19/17 6:32 PM TABLE OF CONTENTS AUTHORS’ INTRODUCTION egendary”—that is the label most often applied to the “thirty-four.” It is called, “the best tank in the world,” almost as often. Choice quotes appear Publisher’s Preface ....................................................................................................................... iii “Lin book after book. From Kleist we see “Their T-34 was the finest tank in the world;” from Mellenthin, “It was the most excellent example of an offensive weapon Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................... iv in the Second World War;” and from von Zenger und Etterlin, “The T-34 surpassed all Authors’ Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 other tanks. Its hull shape was ideal and served as the model for many later tanks.” The West German magazine Soldat un Technik commented, “The T-34 was indisputably Chapter 1. Birth of the Legend...................................................................................................... 5 a masterpiece of military equipment.” Hearing these laudatory odes, however, people are bothered by an insidious question: why is it that in 1941 the Red Army, which had Chapter 2. The T-34: A Candid Portrait of the Tank During Development ............................ 15 1,000 of these remarkable tanks that “so surpassed the German tanks and became a 1 Chapter 3. The Complicated Path to Mass Production .......................................................... 35 real nightmare for the German army’s infantry and antitank defense,” failed to rout the enemy with “little bloodshed, on foreign soil,” but retreated to Moscow and Leningrad Chapter 4. Skillful Hands ............................................................................................................. 42 instead? Why is it that newsreels showing “thirty-fours” driving through the streets of Chapter 5. Baptism by Fire .......................................................................................................... 63 liberated cities flying red banners were only shot in 1942 and 1943, when the most acute phase of the crisis with Germany’s armored blitzkrieg was already over? In any event, in Chapter 6. Mechanism of Disaster .......................................................................................... 110 1942 Germany’s generals had not yet lost battles due to “the superiority of the Russian T-34 tanks that sharply demonstrated their superiority from the first.” 2 However, Soviet Chapter 7. Under Operation Typhoon ...................................................................................... 141 propaganda found a simple answer to this
Load more

Recommended publications
  • M6 Heavy Tank the Newly-Formed Heavy Tank Platoons Are Lieutenant Giving a Good Account of Themselves
    HEAVY TANK PLATOON Lieutenant M6 HEAVY TANK The newly-formed heavy tank platoons are Lieutenant giving a good account of themselves. DEVELOPMENT Heavy Tank Platoons are rated as: Confident Trained At the outbreak of World War II the US Army DESIGN FEATURES possessed few tanks, and no heavy tanks. In OON May 1940 the US Army Ordnance Department When the specifications were laid down PLatooN T for the M6 heavy tank it was normal for Command M6 heavy tank started to work on the T1, 50-ton heavy LA heavy tanks, such as the Soviet T-35, HQ Tank multi-turreted tank. This was similar in 3 M6 heavy tanks ...... 510 points P concept to the Soviet T-35 and other 1930s to follow the ‘land battleship’ model, ‘land battleship’ designs. By October 1940, having multiple turrets mounting a 2 M6 heavy tanks ...... 340 points Sergeant CorporalSergeant the Department reached the same conclusions variety of guns and machine-guns. The 1 M6 heavy tank ....... 170 points of excessive size, difficulty in crew co- T1 heavy tank specification featured a ordination and high production cost that had slightly more modern arrangement with led to the abandonment of the land battleship both of its guns mounted in the same REPLACING StANDARD EQUIPMENT concept in Europe. turret and its twin .50 cal machine- Any US company may replace a Tank Platoon guns in a relatively conventional bow M6 heavy tank M6 heavy tank A new T1 heavy tank design was laid down with mounting. taken as a Support platoon with a Heavy a single turret retaining the mixed armament Tank Platoon.
    [Show full text]
  • Tank Destroyer Field Manual
    MHI FM 18-5 Copy 3 WAR DEPARTMENT TANK DESTROYER FIELD MANUAL ORGANIZATION AND TACTICS OF TANK DESTROYElR UNITS June 16, 1942 I~~~~~JI soZII FM 18-5 TANK DESTROYER FIELD MANUAL ORGANIZATION AND TACTICS OF TANK DESTROYER UNITS UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1942 WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, June 16, 1942. FM 18-5, Tank Destroyer Field Manual, Organization and Tactics of Tank Destroyer Units, is published for the infor- mation and guidancQ ofall concerned. [A. G. 062.11 (5-26-42).] BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF WAR: G. C. MARSHALL, Chief of Staff. OFFICIAL: J. A. ULIO, Major General, The Adjutant General. DISTRIBUTION: Bn and H 1-7, 17, 18 (3); I C 2-7, 9-11 (3); C 17, 18 (20). (For explanation of symbols see FM 21-6.) TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. Armored combat. Paragraphs Page SECTION I. Characteristics of armored forces_ 1-3 1 II. Tank tactics ____________________ 4-8 4 CHAPTER 2. Tank destroyer characteristics and or- ganization. SECTION I. Mission and characteristics ______ 9-11 7 II. Moral qualities___- _______---____ 12-13 8 III. Weapons ---_______ ______________ 14-16 8 IV. Communications ________________ 17-25 11 V. General organization _____-_____. 26-31 14 CHAPTER 3. Combat. SECTION I. Duties of commanders _____- _____ 32-35 16 II. Allocation and employment of units___-----_________.------- 36-56 18 III. Positions and areas ______--- ___- 57 24 CHAPTER 4. Tank destroyer company. SECTION I. Tank destroyer squad and sec- tion____-- ______________------- 58-63 27 II. Antiaircraft section ____________- 64-67 35 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Projected Acquisition Costs for the Army's Ground Combat Vehicles
    Projected Acquisition Costs for the Army’s Ground Combat Vehicles © MDart10/Shutterstock.com APRIL | 2021 At a Glance The Army operates a fleet of ground combat vehicles—vehicles intended to conduct combat opera- tions against enemy forces—and plans to continue to do so. Expanding on the Army’s stated plans, the Congressional Budget Office has projected the cost of acquiring such vehicles through 2050. Those projections include costs for research, development, test, and evaluation (RDT&E) and for procurement but not the costs of operating and maintaining the vehicles. CBO’s key findings are as follows: • Total acquisition costs for the Army’s ground combat vehicles are projected to average about $5 billion per year (in 2020 dollars) through 2050—$4.5 billion for procurement and $0.5 billion for RDT&E. • The projected procurement costs are greater (in constant dollars) than the average annual cost for such vehicles from 2010 to 2019 but approximately equal to the average annual cost from 2000 to 2019 (when spending was boosted because of operations in Iraq). • More than 40 percent of the projected acquisition costs of Army ground combat vehicles are for Abrams tanks. • Most of the projected acquisition costs are for remanufactured and upgraded versions of current vehicles, though the Army also plans to acquire an Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle, which will replace the Bradley armored personnel carrier; an Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle, which will replace the M113 armored personnel carrier; and a new Mobile Protected Firepower tank, which will be lighter than an Abrams tank. • The Army is also considering developing an unmanned Decisive Lethality Platform that might eventually replace Abrams tanks.
    [Show full text]
  • Errors in American Tank Development in World War II Jacob Fox James Madison University
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Masters Theses The Graduate School Spring 2013 The rW ong track: Errors in American tank development in World War II Jacob Fox James Madison University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019 Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Fox, Jacob, "The rW ong track: Errors in American tank development in World War II" (2013). Masters Theses. 215. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019/215 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the The Graduate School at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Wrong Track: Errors in American Tank Development in World War II Jacob Fox A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of History May 2013 ii Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................... iii Introduction and Historiography ....................................................................... 1 Chapter One: America’s Pre-War tank Policy and Early War Development ....... 19 McNair’s Tank Destroyers Chapter Two: The Sherman on the Battlefield ................................................. 30 Reaction in the Press Chapter Three: Ordnance Department and the T26 ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download M103 Heavy Tank, 1950-74 Ebook, Epub
    M103 HEAVY TANK, 1950-74 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Kenneth W. Estes,Richard Chasemore | 48 pages | 19 Mar 2013 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC | 9781849089814 | English | United Kingdom M103 Heavy Tank, 1950-74 PDF Book Army tank engineering of the late s. About This Item. Best for. The heavy tank proved fairly popular with its crews, who above all respected the powerful armament it carried. M7 Priest mm Howitzer Motor Carriage. While the US Army deactivated its heavy armor units with the reception of the new M60 series main battle tanks in , the remaining Ms stayed within the US Marine Corps inventory until they began receiving the M60 series main battle tank. Post—World War II armies have shifted to the Main Battle Tank concept, in which a single model is expected to fulfill the breakthrough functions of a heavy tank while retaining the mobility of medium and light tanks. It may have been the unwanted 'ugly duckling' of the Army, which refrained from naming the M alone of all its postwar tanks. The M is a bit of a footnote in the history of US armour. Welcome to Wargaming. Standard US Army armor battalions at the time had three companies per battalion, each with three five-tank platoons, with 17 tanks per company two tanks were in headquarters platoon. The last Ms were withdrawn from service in Walmart Services. Flag as inappropriate. See all related content. Hannie leads a double life, one as a wife and mother in a Devon manor Range A, Camp Pendleton, California. Ask a question Ask a question If you would like to share feedback with us about pricing, delivery or other customer service issues, please contact customer service directly.
    [Show full text]
  • LIBERTY UNIVERSITY Master's Thesis the M26 Pershing
    LIBERTY UNIVERSITY Master’s Thesis The M26 Pershing: America’s Forgotten Tank - Developmental and Combat History Author : Reader : Supervisor : Robert P. Hanger Dr. Christopher J. Smith Dr. David L. Snead A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master’s of Arts In the Liberty University Department of History May 11, 2018 Abstract The M26 tank, nicknamed the “General Pershing,” was the final result of the Ordnance Department’s revolutionary T20 series. It was the only American heavy tank to be fielded during the Second World War. Less is known about this tank, mainly because it entered the war too late and in too few numbers to impact events. However, it proved a sufficient design – capable of going toe-to-toe with vaunted German armor. After the war, American tank development slowed and was reduced mostly to modernization of the M26 and component development. The Korean War created a sudden need for armor and provided the impetus for further development. M26s were rushed to the conflict and demonstrated to be decisive against North Korean armor. Nonetheless, the principle role the tank fulfilled was infantry support. In 1951, the M26 was replaced by its improved derivative, the M46. Its final legacy was that of being the foundation of America’s Cold War tank fleet. Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………..1 Chapter 1. Development of the T26 …………………………………………………..………..10 Chapter 2. The M26 in Action in World War II …………...…………………………………40 Chapter 3. The Interwar Period ……………………………………………………………….63 Chapter 4. The M26 in Korea ………………………………………………………………….76 The Invasion………………………………………………………...………77 Intervention…………………………………………………………………81 The M26 Enters the War……………………………………………………85 The M26 in the Anti-Tank Role…………………………………………….87 Chapter 5.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Game Manual
    GAME MANUAL © 2008-2013. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PHOTOSENSITIVE SEIZURE WARNING Photosensitive Seizure Warning Important Health Warning About Playing Video Games A very small percentage of people may experience a seizure when exposed to certain visual images, including flashing lights or patterns that may appear in video games. Even people who have no history of seizures or epilepsy may have an undiagnosed condition that can cause these "photosensitive epileptic seizures" while playing or watching video games. These seizures may have a variety of symptoms, including light-headedness, altered vision, eye or face twitching, jerking or shaking of arms or legs, disorientation, confusion, or momentary loss of awareness. Seizures may also cause loss of consciousness or convulsions that can lead to injury from falling down or hitting oneself on nearby objects. Immediately stop playing and consult a doctor if you experience any of these symptoms. Par- ents should watch for or ask their children about the above symptoms - children and teenagers are more likely than adults to experience these seizures. The risk of photosensitive epileptic seizures may be reduced by taking the following pre- cautions: Do not sit too close to the screen. Preferably play the game on a small screen. Avoid playing if you are tired or have not had much sleep. Make sure that the room in which you are playing is well lit. Rest for at least 10 to 15 minutes per hour while playing a video game. © 2008-2013 Wargaming.Net. All rights reserved. ii CONTENTS Contents About World of Tanks. 5 Radial Command Menu. .31 Minimap . .31 Complaints.
    [Show full text]
  • The Soviet-German Tank Academy at Kama
    The Secret School of War: The Soviet-German Tank Academy at Kama THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Ian Johnson Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2012 Master's Examination Committee: Jennifer Siegel, Advisor Peter Mansoor David Hoffmann Copyright by Ian Ona Johnson 2012 Abstract This paper explores the period of military cooperation between the Weimar Period German Army (the Reichswehr), and the Soviet Union. Between 1922 and 1933, four facilities were built in Russia by the two governments, where a variety of training and technological exercises were conducted. These facilities were particularly focused on advances in chemical and biological weapons, airplanes and tanks. The most influential of the four facilities was the tank testing and training grounds (Panzertruppenschule in the German) built along the Kama River, near Kazan in North- Central Russia. Led by German instructors, the school’s curriculum was based around lectures, war games, and technological testing. Soviet and German students studied and worked side by side; German officers in fact often wore the Soviet uniform while at the school, to show solidarity with their fellow officers. Among the German alumni of the school were many of the most famous practitioners of mobile warfare during the Second World War, such as Guderian, Manstein, Kleist and Model. This system of education proved highly innovative. During seven years of operation, the school produced a number of extremely important technological and tactical innovations. Among the new technologies were a new tank chassis system, superior guns, and - perhaps most importantly- a radio that could function within a tank.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of the American Tank-Infantry Team During World War II in Africa and Europe
    Art by Jody Harmon Development of the American Tank-Infantry Team During World War II in Africa and Europe by Captain J. L. Mudd The American tank-infantry team was to destroy antitank weapons, bunkers, and tions, and its weight ranged from 33 to the key maneuver element that led to the unarmored or lightly-armored vehicles.5 almost 36 tons. Typically, the tank car- overwhelming number of tactical suc- When the United States Army entered ried a 75-mm gun, but many were later cesses enjoyed by the United States in the World War II, the two main tanks in its fitted with a 76-mm higher velocity can- Second World War.1 However, this win- arsenal were the M3 light tank and the non. It bristled with bow and coaxial .30- ning combination of men and machines M3 medium tank.6 The Light Tank, M3 caliber machine guns and a flexible tur- had developed throughout the course of Series weighed approximately 14-16 ret-mounted Browning .50 caliber ma- the war, and included a number of varia- tons, depending on the model, and was chine gun for antiaircraft use. Armor on tions based on the theater and areas armed with a 37-mm cannon and up to the turret front was 3.75 inches in effec- within each theater. Original develop- five .30-caliber machine guns. Its thickest tive thickness, while the hull front was ment came from training and lessons effective armor was 1.75 inches on the effectively up to four inches thick.10 learned in the decades between the two turret front and 3 inches on the hull front.
    [Show full text]
  • M27 Medium Tank American Tankers Are Well Trained and Lieutenant Learning Their Trade in the Hard Fighting of Italy
    M27 TANK PLATOON Lieutenant M27 MEDIUM TANK American tankers are well trained and Lieutenant learning their trade in the hard fighting of Italy. DEVELOPMENT M27 Tank Platoons are rated as: The M27 medium tank was born out of the T20 programme. After the M4 series of tanks went into Confident Trained Command M27 medium tank production, consideration immediately turned to its successor. The US Army Ordnance Department was given the go-ahead to start work on an improved medium tank in May 1942. Broad outlines REPLACING STANDARD EQUIPMENT called for a 32-ton tank armed with an automatic 75mm gun with HVSS suspension and capable of a Sergeant Sergeant speed of 25mph. Any US company may replace all of its Tank Platoons with M27 Tank Platoons. If it is The T20 was developed first, but transmission problems led to the tank being cancelled and the a Tank Company, it must also purchase the LATOON best ideas transferred to the T22. This was essentially a T20 with the five-speed transmis- tanks in the Company HQ as M27 medium tanks P sion from the M4 Sherman. The solutions proved unsatisfactory and this led to the project being for 290 points. M27 medium tank M27 medium tank cancelled as well. At the same time as the T22 was authorised, Platoon ANK work began on the T23. It was essentially a T T20 fitted with the tried and tested vertical DESIGN FEATURES 5 M27 medium tanks .... 710 points M27 medium tank M27 medium tank 27 27 volute suspension (VVSS) as used on the M4 Tank Section Tank Section The M27 is as advanced in concept now as 4 M27 medium tanks ...
    [Show full text]
  • T14 Assault Tank the New T14 Assault Tank Gives British Infantry Tank Battalions Their First 75Mm Gun Tank
    REPLACING StaNdaRD EQUIPMENT IN BRITISH SERVICE T14 ASSAULT TANK The new T14 assault tank gives British infantry tank battalions their first 75mm gun tank. OON Any British company may replace all Infantry Tank Platoons equipped with Churchill tanks with DEVELOPMENT at Assault Tank Platoons. If it is an Infantry Tank Company it must also purchase all tanks in When America entered the war in late 1941 they and the British immediately got together to the Company HQ as T14 assault tanks for 135 points per tank. L consider tank designs. The Americans learned from the British tank combat experience, while the P British examined American tank designs to see how they fit their requirements. Subaltern In September 1941 the British had expressed interest in a heavier tank after their experiences ASSAULT TANK PLatOON NK in the desert and teething problems with their new Churchill tank. At the same time the US The assault tank platoons have won the Subaltern A Ordnance Department had been advocating the adoption of heavier tanks for the US Army. The T14 confidence of the infantry they support. T assault tank was seen as the solution for both these needs. T Assault Tank Platoons are rated as: The US Ordnance Department started design work on a tank that shared many features with the Confident Trained M6 heavy tank, but incorporated British requirements. With design work on the new M4 Sherman UL Command A medium tank nearing completion, the design shared many features of this tank. The new tank had PLatooN T14 assault tank the transmission of the M4 Sherman and the standard Ford GAZ tank engine.
    [Show full text]
  • Preserving Shock Action: a New Approach to Armored Maneuver Warfare
    Preserving Shock Action: A New Approach to Armored Maneuver Warfare by Lester W. Grau In theory, mechanized infantry, self-propelled artillery, and ar- RPGs. They first destroyed the Russian lead and rear vehicles mored forces are mutually supporting. Artillery rains destruction on the side streets, trapping the unit. The tanks could not lower to the front and flanks as infantry personnel carriers and dis- their gun tubes far enough to shoot into basements or high enough mounted infantry protect tanks from enemy antitank systems and to reach the tops of buildings. Infantry fighting vehicles and per- enemy infantry. Simultaneously, tanks protect the personnel car- sonnel carriers were unable to support their tanks. Chechens sys- riers and dismounted infantry from enemy tanks and strong tematically destroyed the column from above and below with points. In practice, personnel carriers have problems keeping up RPGs and grenades. Other Chechens surrounded the force in with fast-moving tanks, their armor protection is too thin to sur- the train station. The commander of the Russian unit waited un- vive at the point of the attack and battle drills between tanks and til 2 January for reinforcements, but they never arrived. Part of mechanized infantry frequently break down due to the lack of his decimated unit broke out. By 3 January 1995, the brigade had sufficient team training prior to combat. Artillery fire may be on lost nearly 800 men, 20 of its 26 tanks, and 102 of its 120 ar- or off target, or too early or too late. The bottom line is that mored vehicles.2 there is often too great a gap between the tanks and the mecha- nized infantry at the crucial point and artillery may not bridge Several nations have recognized the problem of the tactical gap that gap.
    [Show full text]