DOCSLIB.ORG

Chatham-Kent Trails Master Plan FINAL REPORT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chatham-Kent Trails Master Plan FINAL REPORT Municipality of Chatham-Kent Ontario, Canada www.chatham-kent.ca Chatham-Kent Trails Master Plan FINAL REPORT Contract No. P-07-55 | September 2009 TransActive Solutions Chatham-Kent Trails Master Plan | Design Guidelines B MMM Group Limited | November 2008 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Chatham-Kent Trails Master Plan is the product of dedicated work by many people. This plan was developed by a Steering Committee and a Consultant Team and was shaped by all those who participated in its creation. The Consultant Team would like to thank the Municipality of Chatham-Kent for the opportunity to develop the Chatham- Kent Trails Master Plan, and would like to extend our sincere appreciation to members of staff, the Steering Committee and the public who gave their time and energy in the development of this plan, especially those who provided input at various points throughout the project. STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS Tom Beaton, D.H.T., CMM1 Manager, Parks, Cemeteries & Horticulture Community (Project Manager) Services Division, Municipality of Chatham-Kent Marsha Coyne, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner, Planning Services, Municipality of Chatham Kent Nelson Cavacas, C.E.T. Manager, Engineering and Transportation Division, Municipality of Chatham Kent Joy Sim Tourism Development Coordinator, Municipality of Chatham Kent Laurel Cammaart Chatham-Kent Public Health Councilor Karen Herman Chatham-Kent Municipal Council Ward 2 - South Kent Rick Gray Chatham-Kent Trails Council (President) Paul Gardiner Cycle Chatham-Kent (President) John te Sligte South Kent Trails Association Diane Flook South Kent Trails Association Paul Roy Rotary Sunrise, Mitchell’s Bay Charles Masefi eld Wallaceburg Trails Association PROJECT CONSULTANT TEAM Dave McLaughlin MCIP, RPP MMM Group Limited (Consultant Project Manager) Jay Cranstone, OALA, CSLA MMM Group Limited, Senior Landscape Architect Melissa Cameron, OALA CSLA MMM Group Limited, Landscape Architect, GIS Specialist Michael Haynes TransActive Solutions (Director) Chatham-Kent Trails Master Plan i MMM Group Limited and TransActive Solutions | Final Report September 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................1-1 1.1 Trails in Chatham-Kent .................................................................................................1-1 1.1.1 Policy Context ...................................................................................................1-2 1.2 What is a Master Plan? ..................................................................................................1-3 1.3 The Study Process ........................................................................................................1-3 1.4 Organization of this Report ...........................................................................................1-5 2.0 THE NEED FOR A TRAILS MASTER PLAN ............................2-1 2.1 Keeping Pace with the Demand for Trails ....................................................................2-2 2.2 Vision of the Plan ...........................................................................................................2-2 2.3 Goal and Objectives .......................................................................................................2-3 2.4 The Benefi ts of Trails in Chatham-Kent ........................................................................2-3 2.4.1 Active Lifestyles-Healthy Citizens ....................................................................2-3 2.4.2 A Greener Chatham-Kent ..................................................................................2-4 2.5 Economic Development and Tourism ...........................................................................2-5 2.5.1 The Role of Trails in Chatham-Kent’s Tourism Strategy .................................2-6 3.0 LEARNING FROM CHATHAM-KENT’S CITIZENS ..................3-1 3.1 Consulting Other Stakeholders .....................................................................................3-1 3.2 On Line Survey ...............................................................................................................3-1 3.2.1 Survey Results ...................................................................................................3-2 3.3 Public Open House ........................................................................................................3-9 4.0 THE TRAIL NETWORK PLAN .................................................4-1 4.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................4-1 4.2 Network Development Process .....................................................................................4-1 4.3 Inventory and Analysis ..................................................................................................4-2 4.4 Guiding Principles for Route Selection ........................................................................4-6 4.4.1 Planning and Design ..........................................................................................4-6 4.4.2 Cultural Heritage ................................................................................................4-7 4.4.3 Economic Development and Tourism...............................................................4-7 4.4.4 Natural Heritage and Environment ...................................................................4-7 4.4.5 Risk Management and Asset Management ......................................................4-8 Chatham-Kent Trails Master Plan i MMM Group Limited and TransActive Solutions | Final Report September 2009 4.5 The Trail Network Hierarchy ..........................................................................................4-9 4.5.1 Municipal-wide Spine Trails ..............................................................................4-9 4.5.2 Local Trails .......................................................................................................4-10 4.5.3 Special Use Trails ............................................................................................4-11 4.6 The Recommended Trail Network ...............................................................................4-12 4.6.1 The Trans Canada Trail and the Tecumseh Parkway .....................................4-13 5.0 TRAIL DESIGNER’S TOOLBOX...............................................5-1 5.1 About these Guidelines .................................................................................................5-1 5.1.1 How to Use These Guidelines ...........................................................................5-1 5.2 Trail Users and Needs ....................................................................................................5-2 5.2.1 Pedestrians ........................................................................................................5-2 5.2.2 Cyclists ...............................................................................................................5-4 5.2.3 In-Line Skaters, Skateboarders and Non-Motorized Scooter Users...............5-5 5.2.4 All Terrain Vehicles ............................................................................................5-5 5.2.5 Equestrians ........................................................................................................5-6 5.3 General Design Parameters...........................................................................................5-7 5.4 Accessibility ................................................................................................................5-10 5.5 Personal Security .........................................................................................................5-12 5.6 Trail Lighting ................................................................................................................5-13 5.7 Trail Types ....................................................................................................................5-13 5.7.1 Multi-use Trails .................................................................................................5-13 5.7.2 Boulevard Multi-use Trails ..............................................................................5-19 5.7.3 Rails with Trails ................................................................................................5-21 5.7.4 Water Routes ....................................................................................................5-22 5.7.5 On-road Routes ................................................................................................5-23 5.8 Trail Crossings .............................................................................................................5-27 5.8.1 Intersection Pedestrian Signals (IPS) .............................................................5-27 5.8.2 Pedestrian Refuge Islands ..............................................................................5-28 5.8.3 Minor Road .......................................................................................................5-29 5.8.4 Active Railway ..................................................................................................5-31 5.8.5 Farm Crossing of Abandoned Rail Lines .......................................................5-31 5.8.6 Gates and Barriers ...........................................................................................5-32 5.9 Trail Structures for Off-road Trails ..............................................................................5-34
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rank of Pops
    Table 1.3 Basic Pop Trends County by County Census 2001 - place names pop_1996 pop_2001 % diff rank order absolute 1996-01 Sorted by absolute pop growth on growth pop growth - Canada 28,846,761 30,007,094 1,160,333 4.0 - Ontario 10,753,573 11,410,046 656,473 6.1 - York Regional Municipality 1 592,445 729,254 136,809 23.1 - Peel Regional Municipality 2 852,526 988,948 136,422 16.0 - Toronto Division 3 2,385,421 2,481,494 96,073 4.0 - Ottawa Division 4 721,136 774,072 52,936 7.3 - Durham Regional Municipality 5 458,616 506,901 48,285 10.5 - Simcoe County 6 329,865 377,050 47,185 14.3 - Halton Regional Municipality 7 339,875 375,229 35,354 10.4 - Waterloo Regional Municipality 8 405,435 438,515 33,080 8.2 - Essex County 9 350,329 374,975 24,646 7.0 - Hamilton Division 10 467,799 490,268 22,469 4.8 - Wellington County 11 171,406 187,313 15,907 9.3 - Middlesex County 12 389,616 403,185 13,569 3.5 - Niagara Regional Municipality 13 403,504 410,574 7,070 1.8 - Dufferin County 14 45,657 51,013 5,356 11.7 - Brant County 15 114,564 118,485 3,921 3.4 - Northumberland County 16 74,437 77,497 3,060 4.1 - Lanark County 17 59,845 62,495 2,650 4.4 - Muskoka District Municipality 18 50,463 53,106 2,643 5.2 - Prescott and Russell United Counties 19 74,013 76,446 2,433 3.3 - Peterborough County 20 123,448 125,856 2,408 2.0 - Elgin County 21 79,159 81,553 2,394 3.0 - Frontenac County 22 136,365 138,606 2,241 1.6 - Oxford County 23 97,142 99,270 2,128 2.2 - Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Municipality 24 102,575 104,670 2,095 2.0 - Perth County 25 72,106 73,675
    [Show full text]
  • County of Lambton Accessibility Plan 2014-2019
    County of Lambton Accessibility Plan 2014-2019 Table of Contents PREFACE ....................................................................................................................... 1 OBJECTIVES OF THE PLAN ......................................................................................... 2 Reviews ........................................................................................................................... 2 Review - When Issued Identified by Citizen .................................................................... 2 Barrier Identification ........................................................................................................ 2 Barrier Removal .............................................................................................................. 2 Approval .......................................................................................................................... 2 OPERATIONAL REVIEWS ............................................................................................. 3 Reviews for 2013 ......................................................................................................... 3 Reviews for 2014-2019 ................................................................................................ 3 MONITORING PROCESS .............................................................................................. 4 New Programs/Services: ............................................................................................. 5 Budget: .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Passing the Means Test: the Old-Age Pension Applications of Norfolk County, Ontario, 1929-1948 by GUY ST-DENIS*
    Passing the Means Test: The Old-Age Pension Applications of Norfolk County, Ontario, 1929-1948 by GUY ST-DENIS* Introduction In 1927 Dominion legislation introduced a joint federal and provincial old age pen- sion programme to Canada. Ontario's participation began in 1929 under the direc- tion of a provincial commission within the Department of Labour. To qualify for the pension applicants had to meet a series of eligibility requirements, which included the means test (or evaluation of a person's pecuniary resources and ability to provide a livelihood). These requirements have since been condemned as a humiliation to aged citizens, a bureaucratic burden on municipal clerks (who dou- bled as local pension secretaries), and a discriminatory device used by government against those applicants deemed undeserving. Yet, from a research perspective, the restrictive nature of the programme did serve to generate large quantities of quan- tifiable data on the social and economic conditions of Ontario's elderly between 1929 and 1948, data which are not normally contained in other government records. While the interpretation of this data is the domain of historians, archivists will be expected to provide the provenance for these and other welfare records, as interest in the field of social history continues to grow. Using the Norfolk Local Board as an example, this article will examine the administration of old age pensions during the programme's first twenty years; the type and scope of information recorded in the applications; and the current complications of access created by the Ontario Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Residence and Associated Health Disparities: the Case of Chatham-Kent
    Western Public Health Casebooks Volume 2018 2018 Article 19 2018 Case 14 : Rural Residence and Associated Health Disparities: The aC se of Chatham-Kent Kate Turner Western University Stanley Ing Chatham-Kent Public Health Unit Laura Zettler Chatham-Kent Public Health Unit Gerald McKinley Western University Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/westernpublichealthcases Recommended Citation Turner, T., Ing, S., Zettler, L., McKinley, G. (2018). Rural Residence and Associated Health Disparities: The asC e of Chatham-Kent. in: McKinley, G. & Sibbald, S.L. [eds] Western Public Health Casebook 2018. London, ON: Public Health Casebook Publishing. This Case is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western Public Health Casebooks by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Schulich Interfaculty Program in Public Health CASE 14 Rural Residence and Associated Health Disparities: The Case of Chatham-Kent Kate Turner, BSc, MPH (MPH Class of 2017) Stanley Ing, MPH, CPHI(c) (Epidemiologist, Chatham-Kent Public Health Unit) Laura Zettler, MSc (Epidemiologist/Program Manager, Chatham-Kent Public Health Unit) Gerald McKinley, PhD (Assistant Professor, Western University) Today’s generation is likely the first to be less healthy and die sooner than their parents’ generation (Heart & Stroke, 2017). This statement should activate the critical and analytical parts of one’s thinking to ask: “Are certain populations more affected than others?”; “What are the social, ethical, medical, and economical implications?”; and ultimately; “Why?” To evaluate a population’s health requires an understanding of the population itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities for Healthy Living in Southwestern Ontario: a Focus on Children’S Environments
    Opportunities for Healthy Living in Southwestern Ontario: A Focus on Children’s Environments Opportunities for Healthy Living in Southwestern Ontario: A Focus on Children’s Environments A collaborative project of the Human Environments Analysis Laboratory and the Children’s Health Research Institute Edited by Jason Gilliland, PhD First Edition January 2012 With funding support of Green Shield Canada Foundation Children’s Health Foundation Publication Information Copyright ©2012 Jason Gilliland All rights reserved. Published by the Children’s Health Research Institute How to cite this publication Gilliland, J. (editor). Opportunities for Healthy Living in Southwestern Ontario: A Focus on Children’s Environments, First Edition. London, Ontario: Children’s Health Research Institute; 2012. Contact: Dr Jason Gilliland Dept of Geography, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5C2 Email: [email protected], Tel: 519‐661‐2111 ext81239 www.spatialists.com Contributors Editor and Principal Investigator Dr. Jason Gilliland, Associate Professor of Geography, Health Sciences, and Paediatrics, UWO; Director, Urban Development Program, University of Western Ontario; Director, Human Environments Analysis Laboratory, University of Western Ontario; Scientist, Children's Health Research Institute & Lawson Health Research Institute Scientific Committee Dr. William Avison, Professor of Sociology, Paediatrics, and Epidemiology & Biostatistics, UWO; Chair & Scientist, Children's Health & Therapeutics Div., Children's Health Research Institute; Assistant
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Community Sustainability Plan
    COUNTY OF LAMBTON Integrated Community Sustainability Plan Caring Growing Innovative FINAL Integrated Community Sustainability Plan (ICSP) February 2013 Page 1 Acknowledgements The authors of the Integrated Community Sustainability Plan (ICSP) for the County of Lambton wish to thank the following for their continuing encouragement, comments and assistance in developing the ICSP document. Trio Environmental Services Ron Van Horne, CAO Jim Kutyba, P. Eng., General Manager, Infrastructure & Development Services Division Robert Tremain, General Manager, Cultural Services Division David Cribbs, General Manager, Corporate Services Division Chris Doyle, General Manager, Long-Term Care Division John Innes, General Manager, Financial Services Division Andrew Taylor, General Manager, Public Health Services Division Margaret Roushorne, General Manager, Social Services Division David Posliff, Manager, Planning and Development Services Department Marlene Wood, General Manager, Tourism Sarnia-Lambton Maike Luiken, Dean of Applied Research and Sustainability, Lambton College Jenna Simpson, School Outreach Program, Final Report, UWO, Ivey School Sustainability Assignment, Case Studies Attributions Photos o Lambton County Archives, Library Headquarters, Wyoming o Tourism Sarnia-Lambton archives © 2013, The Corporation of the County of Lambton. All Rights Reserved. The preparation of this sustainable community plan was carried out with assistance from the Green Municipal Fund, a Fund financed by the Government of Canada and administered by the Federation
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Bend, Ont
    Grand Bend Area Vital Signs® is a community check-up conducted by community foundations across Canada that measures the vitality of our communities and identifies significant trends in areas critical to quality of life. Vital Signs® is coordinated nationally by Community Foundations of Canada. Community Check-Up 2019 The communities that Grand Bend Community Foundation serves are strong, vibrant, and full of potential. The Foundation supports organizations that are making our communities even better. To do that well, we need to understand the needs, gaps and challenges. This report gathers data from a variety of sources including Statistics Canada, local health units, United Way, and the Connected Rural Communities Collaborative led by the Grand Bend Area Community Health Centre. The report also includes comments from community leaders about the needs they see. This is just a starting point – a handful of data and perspectives that we hope will frame useful discussions in the future. If you’d like to be part of these discussions, please let us know by contacting Pat Morden at [email protected]. “A significant factor in this area is the lack of reasonable graduated care for people in their senior years. Because of the lack of support, people who need a small amount of support to thrive at home get almost none and carry on with consequent detriments to health, nutrition, mobility and socialization, until often a calamity causes a precipitous exit to another community. ” Rev. Dr. Kate Crawford, Huron Shores United Church If Lambton County was a village of 100 32 people will be 65 years or older in 2036 compared to 21 people in 2016 The population in Central Ontario will Seniors in grow by 27% between now and 2040 27% while the population in Lambton and Grand Bend 51% Huron counties is predicted to decline.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the London-Middlesex Labour Market
    Overview of Migration Patterns Economic Region 570 (Tri-County area) 2001 to 2006 An Analysis of Since 2001 a gradually declining number of people Migration have moved into the Essex / Kent / Lambton tri- county area. Patterns Overview Essex County, This report analyzes the impact of migration on the population (which is Chatham-Kent, & based on Census records) for Essex County, the Municipality of Chatham- Kent, and Lambton County. This geographic area may also be referred to as Lambton County Economic Region 570 or the Windsor – Sarnia area or the tri-county area. While several factors can affect population changes, this report examines population growth and decline due to net-migration only. January 2008 The figures have been taken from Summary Tables based on Statistics Canada's Tax Filer Data Bases. The migration estimates in the tables are derived from a comparison of addresses from individual income tax returns for two consecutive years. Prepared by the Labour Market Analyst: For comparison purposes, data for other counties in Southwestern Ontario has been included. Diane Nease – Windsor / Essex Tel: (519) 560-2529 [email protected] Deb Koscielski – Chatham-Kent, Highlights Sarnia / Lambton Tel : (519) 380-6853 [email protected] More than 4,100 people (almost 1%) of the total population in the tri-county area can be accounted for by net-migration in the last five years. Net-migration to the area has slowed since peaking in 2001-2002 at more than 2,000 people. For the first time this century, people left Visit our website at: the area in 2005-2006 (overall, almost 600 people).
    [Show full text]
  • Legend Key Map
    Corporation of the . County of Lambton Legend Key Map Ontario St S Not to Scale Road Network Types Huron Dr Huron County Local/Other Teir Road Network(s) . Pinery MTO Road Network 95 Klondyke Rd Lambton County Road Network Goosemarsh Li Outer Dr Administrative Boundaries Nipigon St River Rd London Rd Haig Li Ipperwash Rd Willsie Li County Roadways Within The City of Sarnia Lambton County Lake Rd 918 Bog Li Widder Rd Unknown %21 Elliott Rd Other Ontario Jurisdictions Wood Dr 979 North / South Ravenswood Li USA Decker Rd Venetian Boulevard County Road 24 Thomson Li 97 96 Front Street County Road 33 Proof Li Ridge Rd Northville Rd Jericho Rd Cedar Point Li Indian Road County Road 29 Fuller Rd Lakeshore Rd 99 Modeland Road County Road 27 Rawlings Rd Hubbard Li 912 Jura Li Gordon Rd Airport Road County Road 23 Bluepoint Dr KinnairdRd Townsend Li East / West Lake Huron Douglas Li Main St S Hickory Creek Li 30 Tamarack Li Ann St 9 Rock Glen Rd Lakeshore Road County Road 7 Detail - A Aberarder Li Birnam Li Queen St 911 FirstSchool Rd Michigan Road County Road 19 See Detail - A ElartonRd Chalk Li Old Lakeshore Rd Brush Rd 979 Hyslop Li HillsboroRd 99 Lakeshore Rd BG 97 Fisher Li Brick Yard Li 7 Blackwell Rd QuakerRd London Line County Road 22 9 Bethel Rd 21 WisbeachRd Lakeshore RdClarence St Cathcart Blvd Michigan Li % 26 O'Brien Rd London Road County Road 16 Michigan Ave 9 Michigan Li Egremont Rd ArkonaRd Jackson Rd Fleming Rd Uttoxeter Rd 922 Sexton Rd 7 MacFarlane Rd 9 Blue HeronRd Exmouth St 402 OilHeritage Rd 402 Hwy W 402 Hwy E Confederation Road County Road 25 % 402 Murphy Rd % Haight Ln London Li Airport Rd Zion Li Sylvan Crt Davis St 922 Salt Rd Devine St Power Rd Dorchester Dr HillcrestDr St.
    [Show full text]
  • DROP YOUR ANCHOR in LAMBTON SHORES a Newcomer’S Guide for Living in Lambton Shores
    DROP YOUR ANCHOR IN LAMBTON SHORES A newcomer’s guide for living in Lambton Shores 1 WELCOME TO LAMBTON SHORES Welcome to the Municipality of Lambton Shores! ur sparkling blue waters, sandy shorelines, heritage forests, Oand charming small-town atmosphere makes Lambton Shores a summer destination of choice for visitors, but it is not hard to see why many call Lambton Shores home! Beaches, trails, campgrounds, markets and endless entertainment options make Lambton Shores an exciting and vibrant place to live year round. Historic towns and villages host unique shops and restaurants, while nature enthusiasts love the abundance of wildlife, birds and butterflies found throughout our unique Carolinian and Oak Savanna forests. 2 WELCOME TO LAMBTON SHORES Live theatre, waterfront recreation, mouthwatering local cuisine and the infinite number of activities in between provide a variety of ways to spend your free time, and the low cost of living compared to many Canadian cities will allow you to enjoy life’s luxuries. Our rural setting, relaxed waterfront lifestyle and friendly neighbourhoods are added bonuses to the low cost of living and convenient access to services. Plenty of room for growth and opportunity await you in Lambton Shores. Read on to learn about what many already know - and what you need to discover - about our spectacular community! 3 Lambton Shores was a natural fit for us when we decided to relocate our young family! We have a big yard that our kids and pets can run and play in, and when we get tired of that, we can head out to a trail for a family hike.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Guelph Atrium
    NEWS BULLETIN UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH Vol . 10-25 18th July , 1966 ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES IN THE DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICAL RESOURCES The Department of Physical Resources, under the direction of Mr. David Scott, is responsible for all building programs and planning schemes within the University complex. From the approved architects' plans for a new building to the last light-bulb fixture to be installed, the Department of Physical Resources supervises and controls each step in the development. It is also responsible for all maintenance in the existing buildings including janitorial services, and for making renovations where they are necessary. The model plan, which is normally housed in the Foyer of the Administration Building, was designed by this department. For the past three weeks, the model has been on loan to the City of Guelph as part of the Development Fund program. Three major sections have been set up under Mr. Scott. Engineering Services with Mr. W.A. Brown at the head is in charge of Construction, Utilities, Maintenance and Engineering. Mr. M.G. S p a n k i e , P . E n g . has been appointed head of the Engineering Section under Mr. W.A. Brown. He can be readied at EXT.306. Mr. Jack Little is Head of the Construction Section, and Mr. Harry Parkinson controls Utilities. In the Maintenance Section, Mr. W.H. Rozel, P.Eng. has been appointed Head, with Mr. W.F. Bohn assuming the new position of Maintenance Co-Ordinator, and Mr. C.F. Hardy the position of Maintenance Trades Supervisor. Mr. Rozel, who is also responsible to Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation of Butterflies in Southern Ontario
    efforts for these butterflies must take that into Conservation of Butterflies account. Re-discovered butterflies One of the great thrills for butterfly enthusiasts in Southern Ontario in North America is to re-discover colonies of by Peter W. Hall a butterfly species in a region where it had not been, or rarely, seen for many years. This has happened with two species in the province. In June, 1891, four Gorgone Checkerspots were found at Scarborough just west of Introduction dramatically, a number of formerly restricted Toronto. A few other historical records from Butterflies at the edge of their range often range species in southwestern Ontario have the late 19th century exist from London and expand or contract their distribution and been breeding farther north and east in from the Humber Valley west of Toronto. numbers based on factors such as annual large numbers. Finally, for some butterflies, As well, there were a few specimens taken migration, climate shifts and habitat loss. In particularly those annual migrants with in 1907 at White Rock, Algoma District southern Ontario, many butterfly species are fluctuating breeding numbers or special case in Northern Ontario. Then there was no at the northern, or in some cases southern, species, the jury is still out on possible range indication that the butterfly existed in the edge of their range and in recent times have expansions or shrinkages over time. province for almost a hundred years. exhibited shifting ranges and numbers that However, in 1996 a small colony was raise conservation challenges. Sometimes Extirpated butterflies encountered near Kemptville in eastern these shifts are very noticeable such as the Although no butterfly species that were Rick Cavasin Ontario and subsequently about a dozen final disappearance of ‘Karner’ Melissa Blues found in Ontario have gone extinct, three Gorgone Checkerspots rolled in and then more colonies were found in the same in the 1980s or the appearance of the Giant eastern North American butterflies have been rolled out, apparently in concert with vicinity.
    [Show full text]