DOCSLIB.ORG

Q1. the Most Important Characteristic of Tundra Is the Permafrost

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Q1. the Most Important Characteristic of Tundra Is the Permafrost Q1. The most important characteristic of Tundra is the Permafrost. Consider the following statements with reference to it: 1. The permafrost remains void of any type of vegetation as no plant can grow and survive in permafrost. 2. Permafrost is found in and around the Arctic and Antarctic regions only. The correct statement(s) is/are: (a) Only 1 (b) Only 2 (c) 1 and 2 both (d) Neither 1 nor 2 Answer D Neither of the statement is correct with reference to permafrost. In the permafrost regions, the soil is frozen from 25-90 cms down and very few plants can grow in it, so the permafrost is plain without many trees but many type of vegetations are found in it. The second statement is also correct as the permafrost is also found in high altitude montane regions such as Himalayas as well. Thus, D is the correct answer. Q2. Consider the following statements with reference to Tundra Biome: 1. There are no deep root systems in the vegetation of the Arctic tundra. 2. The average summer temperature in Tundra biome never comes within the positive range. The correct statement(s) is/are: (a) Only 1 (b) Only 2 (c) 1 and 2 both (d) Neither 1 nor 2 Answer A Explanation: Only the first statement is correct. There areno deep root systems in the vegetation of the arctic tundra; however, there are still a wide variety of plants that are able to resist the cold climate. The second statement is incorrect. The average summer temperature is 3-12° C (37-54° F) which enables this biome to sustain life. Thus, A is the correct answer. 3. Arctic Tundra is considered as one of the most fragile existing ecosystems in the world. What is the main reason of this extreme fragility of this terrestrial ecosystem? (a) Lack of abundant plant life. (b) Extremity of UV rays in sun rays. (c) Overpopulated predators (d) None of the above Answer A Explanation: Arctic Tundra is extremely fragile because of the lack of abundant plant life. Due the scarcity of the primary producers, the fragile ecosystem and food chain causes the population continually oscillate. This means that extinction of just one species has the capability to destroy the entire ecosystem in Tundra regions. Thus, A is the correct answer. Q4. The Alpine tundra can be found in: 1. Alps and Pyrenees of Europe 2. The Rift Mountains of Africa ©Jatin Verma All Rights Reserved. https://www.jatinverma.org 3. Tibetan Plateau Choose the correct answer using the options given below: (a) Only 1 (b) Only 1 and 3 (c) Only 3 (d) All of the above Answer D Explanation: Alpine tundra can be found in all of the given locations. While the Arctic Tundra is located in Polar regions, the Alpine tundra is located on mountains throughout the world at high altitude where treescannot grow. Alps and Pyrenees of Europe, the Rift Mountains of Africa (such as Mount Kilimanjaro), and a large portion of the Tibetan Plateau are best examples of Alpine Tundra. Thus, D is the correct answer. Q5. Consider the following statements with reference to the difference between Alpine and Arctic Tundra biomes: 1. Unlike Arctic biome, the soil in alpine tundra is well-drained. 2. There is no permafrost in alpine tundra biomes. 3. There is significant difference between flora and fauna of Alpine and Arctic tundra biomes. The correct statement(s) is/are: (a) Only 1 and 2 (b) Only 1 and 3 (c) Only 2 and 3 (d) All of the above Answer A Explanation: Only the first and second statements are correct. The third statement is not correct. The plants of Alpine Tundra are very similar to those of the arctic ones, however there is a major difference in the fauna of Arctic Tundra and Alpine Tundra. The correct answer is A. Q6. Which of the following Biomes known as “Boreal Forests”? (a) Alpine Tundra Biome (b) Antarctic Tundra Biome (c) Taiga Biome (d) None of the above Answer C Explanation: Taiga Biome is known as Boreal Forest. Thus, C is the correct answer. Q7. Consider the following statements with reference to Taiga biome: 1. Taiga is earth’s largest terrestrial biome, covering more than 50% of World’s Forest cover. 2. Taiga biome is characterised by overwhelming presence of coniferous forests. The correct statement(s) is/are: (a) Only 1 (b) Only 2 (c) 1 and 2 both (d) Neither 1 nor 2 ©Jatin Verma All Rights Reserved. https://www.jatinverma.org Answer B Explanation: Only the second statement is correct. The first statement is partially correct. Taiga is earth’s largest terrestrial biome, but it accounts for 29% of World’s Forest cover only. The given statement is exaggerated and checks on aspirnats’ common sense :) The second statement however is correct. Thus, B is the correct answer. Q8. Consider the following information with reference to an biome: 1. There is no presence of this biome in the southern hemisphere. 2. Largest areas under these biomes are located in Russia and Canada 3. This biome have also its presence in northern Kazakhstan, northern Mongolia, and northern Japan. Identify the correct answer using the options given below: (a) Tundra (b) Taiga (c) Montane grasslands (d) Temperate deciduous forests Answer B Explanation: All of the above given above information is correct with reference to Taiga Biome. Thus, B is the correct answer. Q9. Consider the following statements with reference to the Soil features of Taiga biome: 1. The Taiga soil is significantly rich in nutrients in comparison to the temperate deciduous forests. 2. The Taiga soil is acidic due to the falling pine needles. 3. The diversity of soil organisms in the boreal forest is high, comparable to the tropical rainforest. The correct statement(s) is/are: (a) Only 1 and 2 (b) Only 1 and 3 (c) Only 2 and 3 (d) All of the above Answer C Explanation: The first statement is incorrect. The Taiga soil is poor in nutrients in comparison to the temperate deciduous forests. This is because the fallen leaves and moss can remain on the forest floor,without decomposing for a long time in the cool, moist climate. The rest of the statements are correct with respect to Taiga biome. Thus, C is the correct answer. Q10. Consider the following statements with reference to floral features of vegetation in Taiga biome: 1. The forests of the taiga are largely coniferous, dominated by larch, spruce, fir, and pine. 2. The leaves are needle shaped to curb loss of water and with dark green color to increase absorption of sunlight. 3. The roots of Taiga Trees are shallow, which is basically to take advantage of the young thin soil. The correct statement(s) is/are: (a) Only 1 and 2 (b) Only 1 and 3 (c) Only 2 and 3 (d) All of the above ©Jatin Verma All Rights Reserved. https://www.jatinverma.org Answer D Explanation: All of the above are correct with reference to floral features of vegetation of Taiga biome. Thus, D is the correct answer. ©Jatin Verma All Rights Reserved. https://www.jatinverma.org .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reduced Net Methane Emissions Due to Microbial Methane Oxidation in a Warmer Arctic
    LETTERS https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0734-z Reduced net methane emissions due to microbial methane oxidation in a warmer Arctic Youmi Oh 1, Qianlai Zhuang 1,2,3 ✉ , Licheng Liu1, Lisa R. Welp 1,2, Maggie C. Y. Lau4,9, Tullis C. Onstott4, David Medvigy 5, Lori Bruhwiler6, Edward J. Dlugokencky6, Gustaf Hugelius 7, Ludovica D’Imperio8 and Bo Elberling 8 Methane emissions from organic-rich soils in the Arctic have bacteria (methanotrophs) and the remainder is mostly emitted into been extensively studied due to their potential to increase the atmosphere (Fig. 1a). The methanotrophs in these wet organic the atmospheric methane burden as permafrost thaws1–3. soils may be low-affinity methanotrophs (LAMs) that require However, this methane source might have been overestimated >600 ppm of methane (by moles) for their growth and mainte- without considering high-affinity methanotrophs (HAMs; nance23. But in dry mineral soils, the dominant methanotrophs are methane-oxidizing bacteria) recently identified in Arctic min- high-affinity methanotrophs (HAMs), which can survive and grow 4–7 eral soils . Herein we find that integrating the dynamics of at a level of atmospheric methane abundance ([CH4]atm) of about HAMs and methanogens into a biogeochemistry model8–10 1.8 ppm (Fig. 1b)24. that includes permafrost soil organic carbon dynamics3 leads Quantification of the previously underestimated HAM-driven −1 to the upland methane sink doubling (~5.5 Tg CH4 yr ) north of methane sink is needed to improve our understanding of Arctic 50 °N in simulations from 2000–2016. The increase is equiva- methane budgets.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpine Tundra
    National Park Rocky Mountain Colorado National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Alpine Tundra WHAT IS ALPINE TUNDRA? Where mountaintops rise Arctic tundra occurs around like islands above a sea of the north pole. Alpine tundra trees lies the world of the crowns mountains that alpine tundra. John Muir reach above treeline. called it "a land of deso­ ...a world by itself lation covered with beautiful Rocky Mountain National in the sky. light." Yet this light shines Park is recognized world­ on a tapestry of living detail. wide as a Biosphere Reserve —Enos Mills Tundra lands too cold for because of the beauty and trees support over 200 kinds research value of its alpine of plants, as well as animals wild lands. Alpine tundra is from bighorn to butterflies. a sensitive indicator of such climatic changes as global Tundra is a Russian word for warming and acid rain. Over "land of no trees." 1/3 of the park is tundra. HOW FRAGILE IS IT? For 25 years after Trail That is why busy stops Ridge Road opened in 1932, along Trail Ridge Road are people had free run on the marked as Tundra Protection tundra. Repeated trampling Areas where no walking off damaged popular places. the trail is allowed. Some of these areas, fenced Elsewhere, walking on the off in 1959 for study, show tundra is permitted. But almost no sign of recovery walk with care! Step lightly, today. High winds and long without scuffing the winters make new growth surface. Step on rocks slow. Trampled places may when you can.
    [Show full text]
  • The Exchange of Carbon Dioxide Between Wet Arctic Tundra and the Atmosphere at the Lena River Delta, Northern Siberia
    Biogeosciences, 4, 869–890, 2007 www.biogeosciences.net/4/869/2007/ Biogeosciences © Author(s) 2007. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. The exchange of carbon dioxide between wet arctic tundra and the atmosphere at the Lena River Delta, Northern Siberia L. Kutzbach1,*, C. Wille1,*, and E.-M. Pfeiffer2 1Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Research Unit Potsdam, Telegrafenberg A43, 14473 Potsdam, Germany 2University of Hamburg, Institute of Soil Science, Allende-Platz 2, 20146 Hamburg, Germany *now at Ernst Moritz Arndt University Greifswald, Institute for Botany and Landscape Ecology, Grimmer Straße 88, 17487 Greifswald, Germany Received: 23 May 2007 – Published in Biogeosciences Discuss.: 25 June 2007 Revised: 1 October 2007 – Accepted: 8 October 2007 – Published: 18 October 2007 Abstract. The exchange fluxes of carbon dioxide between piration continued at substantial rates during autumn when wet arctic polygonal tundra and the atmosphere were inves- photosynthesis had ceased and the soils were still largely un- tigated by the micrometeorological eddy covariance method. frozen. The temporal variability of the ecosystem respiration The investigation site was situated in the centre of the Lena during summer was best explained by an exponential func- River Delta in Northern Siberia (72◦220 N, 126◦300 E). The tion with surface temperature, and not soil temperature, as study region is characterized by a polar and distinctly con- the independent variable. This was explained by the ma- tinental climate, very cold and ice-rich permafrost and its jor role of the plant respiration within the CO2 balance of position at the interface between the Eurasian continent and the tundra ecosystem.
    [Show full text]
  • Compilation of U.S. Tundra Biome Journal and Symposium Publications
    COMPILATION OF U.S • TUNDRA BIOME JOURNAL .Alm SYMPOSIUM PUBLICATIONS* {April 1975) 1. Journal Papers la. Published +Alexander, V., M. Billington and D.M. Schell (1974) The influence of abiotic factors on nitrogen fixation rates in the Barrow, Alaska, arctic tundra. Report Kevo Subarctic Research Station 11, vel. 11, p. 3-11. (+)Alexander, V. and D.M. Schell (1973) Seasonal and spatial variation of nitrogen fixation in the Barrow, Alaska, tundra. Arctic and Alnine Research, vel. 5, no. 2, p. 77-88. (+)Allessio, M.L. and L.L. Tieszen (1974) Effect of leaf age on trans­ location rate and distribution of Cl4 photoassimilate in Dupontia fischeri at Barrow, Alaska. Arctic and Alnine Research, vel. 7, no. 1, p. 3-12. (+)Barsdate, R.J., R.T. Prentki and T. Fenchel (1974) The phosphorus cycle of model ecosystems. Significance for decomposer food chains and effect of bacterial grazers. Oikos, vel. 25, p. 239-251. 0 • (+)Batzli, G.O., N.C. Stenseth and B.M. Fitzgerald (1974) Growth and survi­ val of suckling brown lemmings (Lemmus trimucronatus). Journal of Mammalogy, vel. 55, p. 828-831. (+}Billings,. W.D. (1973) Arctic and alpine vegetations: Similarities, dii'­ ferences and susceptibility to disturbance. Bioscience, vel. 23, p. 697-704. (+)Braun, C.E., R.K. Schmidt, Jr. and G.E. Rogers (1973) Census of Colorado white-tailed ptarmigan with tape-recorded calls. Journal of Wildlife Management, vel. 37, no. 1, p. 90-93. (+)Buechler, D.G. and R.D. Dillon (1974) Phosphorus regeneration studies in freshwater ciliates. Journal of Protozoology, vol. 21, no. 2,· P• 339-343.
    [Show full text]
  • From Tropics to Tundra: Global Convergence in Plant Functioning
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 94, pp. 13730–13734, December 1997 Ecology From tropics to tundra: Global convergence in plant functioning PETER B. REICH*†,MICHAEL B. WALTERS‡, AND DAVID S. ELLSWORTH§ *Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108; ‡Faculty of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada V2N 4Z9; and §Department of Applied Science, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973 Communicated by Harold Alfred Mooney, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, September 12, 1997 (received for review May 21, 1997) ABSTRACT Despite striking differences in climate, soils, species, light-saturated net photosynthetic capacity (Amax) and and evolutionary history among diverse biomes ranging from leaf diffusive conductance were measured in the field (7–9) tropical and temperate forests to alpine tundra and desert, we under ambient CO2 concentrations and SLA (projected leaf found similar interspecific relationships among leaf structure area per dry mass), dark respiration (at 25°C), and N concen- and function and plant growth in all biomes. Our results thus tration of those leaves were assessed, on both mass and area demonstrate convergent evolution and global generality in bases. Average leaf life-span (month 5 30.4 days) was assessed plant functioning, despite the enormous diversity of plant for each species in the field, from long term monitoring of species and biomes. For 280 plant species from two global data numerous leaves andyor phenological observation. Field data sets, we found that potential carbon gain (photosynthesis) and on leaf, plant, and ecosystem characteristics also were com- carbon loss (respiration) increase in similar proportion with piled from the literature for species from several continents decreasing leaf life-span, increasing leaf nitrogen concentra- and an equally broad array of biomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Dioxide Sources from Alaska Driven by Increasing Early Winter Respiration from Arctic Tundra
    Carbon dioxide sources from Alaska driven by increasing early winter respiration from Arctic tundra Róisín Commanea,b,1, Jakob Lindaasb, Joshua Benmerguia, Kristina A. Luusc, Rachel Y.-W. Changd, Bruce C. Daubea,b, Eugénie S. Euskirchene, John M. Hendersonf, Anna Kariong, John B. Millerh, Scot M. Milleri, Nicholas C. Parazooj,k, James T. Randersonl, Colm Sweeneyg,m, Pieter Tansm, Kirk Thoningm, Sander Veraverbekel,n, Charles E. Millerk, and Steven C. Wofsya,b aHarvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, MA 02138; bDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; cCenter for Applied Data Analytics, Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin 2, Ireland; dDepartment of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada, B3H 4R2; eInstitute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775; fAtmospheric and Environmental Research Inc., Lexington, MA 02421; gCooperative Institute of Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309; hGlobal Monitoring Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO 80305; iCarnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA 94305; jJoint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095; kJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109; lDepartment of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697; mEarth Science Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO 80305; and nFaculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands Edited by William H. Schlesinger, Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, NY, and approved March 31, 2017 (received for review November 8, 2016) High-latitude ecosystems have the capacity to release large amounts of arctic and boreal landscapes.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpine Tundra of the Krkonoše and Carpathian Mountains
    ALPINE TUNDRA OF THE KRKONOŠE AND CARPATHIAN MOUNTAINS Report on study tour funded by Alfred Toepfer Natural Heritage Scholarship 2016 by Dr. Tymur Bedernichek, M.M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden (Ukraine) Text: Tymur Bedernichek Photos: most of the photos were taken by Tymur Bedernichek; except for those listed below: fig. 6 credit to the British Museum fig. 7 & 13 credit to Robert Erik fig 10 & 11 credit to censor.net.ua fig. 12 credit to vorobus.com fig. 14 credit to podstudnicnou.cz fig. 16 credit to Roman Cherepanyn Sponsorship: this report is the result of study tour funded by Alfred Toepfer Foundation and EUROPARC Federation © EUROPARC Federation, 2017 © Alfred Toepfer Foundation, 2017 2 Acknowledgements I am extremely grateful to EUROPARC Federation and Alfred Toepfer Foundation for the Scholarship. It was not only a very timely support, but also a key that opened many doors. It entailed many pleasant and useful contacts and lucky coincidences, and in the end, I managed to do much more than I had planned. Several people significantly helped me during the study tour: Prof. Natalia Zaimenko, Dr. Blanka Skočdopolová, Dr. Irena Kholová and Prof. Zofia Rączkowska. They were my colleagues, friends and sometimes, even guardian angels. Without their support, I probably would not have been able to complete the project. I would also like to thank Erika Stanciu. Six years ago, she made a presentation at RAPPAM workshop in Ukraine, which I attended with other PhD students. She told us about various funding opportunities for nature conservationists, including Alfred Toepfer Natural Heritage Scholarship, and emphasized how important it is to prepare a strong application.
    [Show full text]
  • A Conservation Vision for Maine Using Ecological Systems
    A Conservation Vision for Maine Using Ecological Systems Hemlock forest Shrub swamp Cedar swamp Northern hardwood forest Justin Schlawin and Andy Cutko Maine Natural Areas Program Maine Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry February 2014 A Conservation Vision for Maine Using Ecological Systems Contents Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction: ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Maine’s Conservation Lands: ........................................................................................................................ 4 Ecological Sections: ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Ecological Systems GIS Layer: ....................................................................................................................... 7 Consolidating Comparable Ecological Systems: ........................................................................................ 7 Requirements for Representation ................................................................................................................ 8 Isolating ‘quality’ patches for each ecological system type .................................................................... 12 Aggregation ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Hampshire Wildlife Action Plan Appendix B Habitats -1 Appendix B: Habitats
    Appendix B: Habitats Appendix B: Habitat Profiles Alpine ............................................................................................................................................................ 2 Appalachian Oak Pine Forest ........................................................................................................................ 9 Caves and Mines ......................................................................................................................................... 19 Grasslands ................................................................................................................................................... 24 Hemlock Hardwood Pine Forest ................................................................................................................. 34 High Elevation Spruce‐Fir Forest ................................................................................................................. 45 Lowland Spruce‐Fir Forest .......................................................................................................................... 53 Northern Hardwood‐Conifer Forest ........................................................................................................... 62 Pine Barrens ................................................................................................................................................ 72 Rocky Ridge, Cliff, and Talus ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WILD Colorado: Crossroads of Biodiversity a Message from the Director
    WILD Colorado: Crossroads of Biodiversity A Message from the Director July 1, 2003 For Wildlife – For People Dear Educator, Colorado is a unique and special place. With its vast prairies, high mountains, deep canyons and numerous river headwaters, Colorado is truly a crossroad of biodiversity that provides a rich environment for abundant and diverse species of wildlife. Our rich wildlife heritage is a source of pride for our citizens and can be an incredibly powerful teaching tool in the classroom. To help teachers and students learn about Colorado’s ecosystems and its wildlife, the Division of Wildlife has prepared a set of ecosystem posters and this education guide. Together they will provide an overview of the biodiversity of our state as it applies to the eight major ecosystems of Colorado. This project was funded in part by a Wildlife Conservation and Restoration Program grant. Sincerely, Russell George, Director Colorado Division of Wildlife Table of Contents Introduction . 2 Activity: Which Niche? . 6 Grasslands Poster . 8 Grasslands . 10 Sage Shrublands Poster . 14 Sagebrush Shrublands . 16 Montane Shrublands Poster . 20 Montane Shrublands . 22 Piñon-Juniper Woodland Poster . 26 Piñon-Juniper Woodland . 28 Montane Forests Poster . 32 Montane Forests . 34 Subalpine Forests Poster . 38 Subalpine Forests . 40 Alpine Tundra Poster . 44 Treeline and Alpine Tundra . 46 Activity: The Edge of Home . 52 Riparian Poster . 54 Aquatic Ecosystems, Riparian Areas, and Wetlands . 56 Activity: Wetland Metaphors . 63 Glossary . 66 References and Field Identification Manuals . 68 This book was written by Wendy Hanophy and Harv Teitelbaum with illustrations by Marjorie Leggitt and paintings by Paul Gray.
    [Show full text]
  • Canopy Structure and Phenology of Alpine Tundra Vegetation
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-1972 Canopy Structure and Phenology of Alpine Tundra Vegetation Marcee Fareed Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Plant Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Fareed, Marcee, "Canopy Structure and Phenology of Alpine Tundra Vegetation" (1972). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 6314. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/6314 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ,, rn.ea . ,1 ,.I,. "'' CANOPYSTRUCTURE AND PHENOLOGY OF ALPINE TUNDRA VEGETATION by Marcee Fareed A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment · of the requirements for the degree of MASTEROF SCIENCE in Plant Ecology Approved: MaJor Professor Committeeman ·committeeman Dean of Graduate Studies UTAHSTATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 1972 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Grateful acknowledgement is made to Dr. Martyn Caldwell for his suggestions on the fieldwork and the preparatton of the thesis. Appreciation is also extended to Thomas Shoemaker and Diane and Roger Hanson for their assistance in gathering the data, and to Professor Arthur Holmgren for helping in the identification of plant species in the voucher collection. Dr. Larry Tieszen is responsible for developing the computer programs used in the analysis of the data. This study was supported by the Tundra Biome of the International Biological Program. ~~ Marcee Fareed iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Acknowledgements ii List of Tables .. iv Li st of Figures v Abstract vi Introduction .
    [Show full text]
  • Alpine Ecosystems
    TWENTY-NINE Alpine Ecosystems PHILIP W. RUNDEL and CONSTANCE I. MILLAR Introduction Alpine ecosystems comprise some of the most intriguing hab­ writing about the alpine meadows of the Sierra Nevada, felt itats of the world for the stark beauty of their landscapes and his words were inadequate to describe “the exquisite beauty for the extremes of the physical environment that their resi­ of these mountain carpets as they lie smoothly outspread in dent biota must survive. These habitats lie above the upper the savage wilderness” (Muir 1894). limit of tree growth but seasonally present spectacular flo­ ral shows of low-growing herbaceous perennial plants. Glob­ ally, alpine ecosystems cover only about 3% of the world’s Defining Alpine Ecosystems land area (Körner 2003). Their biomass is low compared to shrublands and woodlands, giving these ecosystems only a Alpine ecosystems are classically defined as those communi­ minor role in global biogeochemical cycling. Moreover, spe­ ties occurring above the elevation of treeline. However, defin­ cies diversity and local endemism of alpine ecosystems is rela­ ing the characteristics that unambiguously characterize an tively low. However, alpine areas are critical regions for influ­ alpine ecosystem is problematic. Defining alpine ecosystems encing hydrologic flow to lowland areas from snowmelt. based on presence of alpine-like communities of herbaceous The alpine ecosystems of California present a special perennials is common but subject to interpretation because case among alpine regions of the world. Unlike most alpine such communities may occur well below treeline, while other regions, including the American Rocky Mountains and the areas well above treeline may support dense shrub or matted European Alps (where most research on alpine ecology has tree cover.
    [Show full text]