History of Kiribati

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

History of Kiribati History of Kiribati The first settlers of Kiribati probably came from Southeast Asia and Samoa between six hundred and two thousand years ago. Europeans first visited in 1537, when Kiritimati Island was sighted by Spanish explorers. Commercial activity on the islands began in the early 19th century. The northern Gilberts were a favorite whaling ground, and deserting crews began to settle there around 1830. Hiram Bingham, a Protestant who established a mission on Abaiang in 1857, helped the Gilbertese develop a written form of their language. During the latter 1800s, thousands of Gilbertese men were recruited to work overseas. They left because of drought and population problems, but they often found their employment conditions harsh. Many later returned to the islands. In 1886, Britain and Germany signed the Treaty of the Unclaimed Pacific, each taking responsibility for Pacific islands that no other imperial power had claimed. Britain took the Gilbert and Ellice islands. At the same time, German and U.S. labor companies were competing for labor recruits. German traders were worried the United States would colonize the islands and Germany would lose out on trade. They asked their government to annex the islands, but it refused because of the1886 treaty. U.S. traders and Nabureimoa, king of Butaritari, asked the United States to annex the islands. Although Britain did not want another colony, it did not want to lose the islands to the United States, so in 1892 it made the Gilbert and Ellice islands a protectorate. In 1916, both island groups were joined to form the Gilbert and Ellice Islands Colony. The Phoenix and Line islands, which were never permanently inhabited, became part of the territory in the decades that followed. During World War II, Japan occupied the area until U.S. troops invaded in November1943’s Battle of Tarawa. U.S. forces secured the island after three days of intense fighting with heavy casualties on both sides. After the war, administration returned to the British. In 1974, the Ellice Islands held a referendum for independence and subsequently became the nation of Tuvalu. In 1977, internal self-government was established in the Gilberts, and the islands became the independent Republic of Kiribati on 12July 1979. The country remains part of the British Commonwealth. Kiribati was admitted to the United Nations in September1999. It also serves as a member of the Pacific’s regional organization, the 16-nation Pacific Islands Forum. References: “Republic of Kiribati.” CultureGrams World Edition. 2008. Page 1 of 1 .
Recommended publications
  • The Partition of the Gilbert and Ellice Islands W
    Island Studies Journal , Vol. 7, No.1, 2012, pp. 135-146 REVIEW ESSAY The Partition of the Gilbert and Ellice Islands W. David McIntyre Macmillan Brown Centre for Pacific Studies Christchurch, New Zealand [email protected] ABSTRACT : This paper reviews the separation of the Ellice Islands from the Gilbert and Ellice Islands Colony, in the central Pacific, in 1975: one of the few agreed boundary changes that were made during decolonization. Under the name Tuvalu, the Ellice Group became the world’s fourth smallest state and gained independence in 1978. The Gilbert Islands, (including the Phoenix and Line Islands), became the Republic of Kiribati in 1979. A survey of the tortuous creation of the colony is followed by an analysis of the geographic, ethnic, language, religious, economic, and administrative differences between the groups. When, belatedly, the British began creating representative institutions, the largely Polynesian, Protestant, Ellice people realized they were doomed to permanent minority status while combined with the Micronesian, half-Catholic, Gilbertese. To protect their identity they demanded separation, and the British accepted this after a UN-observed referendum. Keywords: Foreign and Commonwealth Office; Gilbert and Ellis islands; independence; Kiribati; Tuvalu © 2012 Institute of Island Studies, University of Prince Edward Island, Canada Context The age of imperialism saw most of the world divided up by colonial powers that drew arbitrary lines on maps to designate their properties. The age of decolonization involved the assumption of sovereign independence by these, often artificial, creations. Tuvalu, in the central Pacific, lying roughly half-way between Australia and Hawaii, is a rare exception.
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 04 Small Is Viable.Pdf
    The U.S. Congress established the East-West Center in 1960 to foster mutual understanding and coopera- tion among the governments and peoples of the Asia Pacific region including the United States. Funding for the Center comes from the U.S. govern- ment with additional support provided by private agencies, individuals, corporations, and Asian and Pacific governments. East-West Center Working Papers are circulated for comment and to inform interested colleagues about work in progress at the Center. For more information about the Center or to order publications, contact: Publication Sales Office East-West Center 1601 East-West Road Honolulu, Hawaii 96848-1601 Telephone: 808-944-7145 Facsimile: 808-944-7376 Email: [email protected] Website: www.EastWestCenter.org EAST-WEST CENTER WORKING PAPERSPAPERSEAST-WEST Pacific Islands Development SeriesSeriesPacific No. 15, April 2002 Small is Viable: The Global Ebbs and Flows of a Pacific Atoll Nation Gerard A. Finin Gerard A. Finin is a Senior Fellow in the Pacific Islands Development Program, East-West Center. He can be reached at telephone: 808-944-7751 or email: [email protected]. East-West Center Working Papers: Pacific Islands Development Series is an unreviewed and unedited prepublication series reporting on research in progress. The views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Center. Please direct orders and requests to the East-West Center's Publication Sales Office. The price for Working Papers is $3.00 each plus postage. For surface mail, add $3.00 for the first title plus $0.75 for each additional title or copy sent in the same shipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Songs Cannot Die”: Ritual Composing and the Politics of Emplacement Among the Banabans Resettled on Rabi Island in Fiji
    33 “SONGS CANNOT DIE”: RITUAL COMPOSING AND THE POLITICS OF EMPLACEMENT AMONG THE BANABANS RESETTLED ON RABI ISLAND IN FIJI WOLFGANG KEMPF University of Göttingen Music and its performance are very important political instruments in the process of constituting place and homeland among the Banaban diaspora, a Micronesian community now mostly living on Rabi Island in Fiji. The central issue I address is how Banabans link locally created, contemporary music to the historical praxis of ongoing emplacement in their new Fijian island home. Music was at best marginal, in my original research project. My primary focus was on the historical dimensions and the more recent experiences and everyday practices associated with the re-localisation of a displaced community in Oceania. But from the very beginning of my 15- months stint of fieldwork on Rabi Island between 1997 and 1998, there was no escaping the evidence that for Rabi Island Banabans singing, dancing and performing dance theatre are of enormous social and political importance—something they share, incidentally, with other mobile and displaced peoples in Oceania (see e.g., Donner 1992, 2002:23-24, Howard and Rensel 2001:81, Thomas and Tuia 1995:110). The argument I develop in this paper is that Banabans deploy these genres of performing arts in order to spatially anchor, preserve and communicate to others the history, culture and identity of their community on Rabi Island. The Banaban community has now been in the Fijian island of Rabi for more than 50 years and Banabans create, perform and disseminate to coming generations music underscoring their spatial and ethnic distinctiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the South Tarawa-Based Women's Interests Program in The
    Waves for Change: the role of the South Tarawa-based women’s interests program in the decolonisation process of the Gilbert Islands SAMANTHA ROSE BA (Hons), Queensland University of Technology (QUT) Submitted in full requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Division of Research and Commercialisation Queensland University of Technology Research Students Centre January 2014 i KEYWORDS History; women; decolonisation; Gilbert and Ellice Islands Colony (GEIC); Kiribati; Tuvalu; women’s clubs; women’s interests; border-dweller; Church-based women’s clubs; women’s fellowships; indigenisation; gender; custom; Pacific women; community workers ii ABSTRACT Histories of the Republic of Kiribati (formerly the Gilbert and Ellice Islands Colony (GEIC)) have failed to fully acknowledge the pivotal role women played individually, as well as collectively through the phenomenon of women’s clubs, in preparing the Colony for independence. In the late 1950s, and in anticipation of the eventual decolonisation of Pacific territories, humanitarian developments within the South Pacific Commission (SPC) called for women's interests to be recognised on the regional Pacific agenda. The British Colonial administration, a founding member of the SPC, took active steps to implement a formalised women's interests program in the GEIC. Acknowledging that women were to have a legitimate role in the new independent nation, albeit restricted to that of the domestic sphere and at the village level, the British Colonial administration, under the leadership of Resident Commissioner VJ Andersen, initiated strategies aimed at building the capacity of organisational structures, personnel, training, networks and communication for community betterment. The strategy focussed on the informal adult education of village women through the creation of a national network of village-based women's clubs.
    [Show full text]
  • Island Towns
    Island Towns Managing Urbanization in Micronesia John Connell and John PLea Occasional Paper 40 Center for Pacific Islands Studies School of Hawaiian, Asian & Pacific Studies University ofHawai'i at Manoa Honolulu and Research Institute for Asia & the Pacific University of Sydney to 1998 by John Connell and John PLea The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of AusAID or any other body associated with it. ISSN 0897-8905 Contents Preface v Acknowledgments vii PART ONE: THE CONTEXT OF URBANIZATION IN MICRONESIA 1 1 Introduction 3 Urban Beginnings 17 2 Population Migration and Urbanization 35 The Demographic Structure 37 Migration in the Region 48 International Migration 60 3 Urban Economy and Society 80 The Urban Economy 86 Employment and Urban Society 97 Conclusion 105 PART Two: URBAN DEVELOPMENT ISSUES 109 4 Urban Management and Planning 110 Land-Use Planning Goals 114 Land-Use Planning in the Federated States of Micronesia 119 Urban Management in Kiribati 122 Urban Planning in the Marshall Islands 126 Master Planning in Palau 127 Strengthening Planning Capabilities in Micronesia 130 5 Urban Land Policy 135 Federated States of Micronesia 137 Kiribati 146 Marshall Islands 149 Palau 151 Addressing the Priorities 154 6 Housing 158 The Urban Housing Process in Micronesia 160 Housing Conditions in Micronesia 163 ,ji Housing Policy in the Micronesian Countries 169 It Accommodating Micronesia 177 7 Public Utilities 181 Water Supply, Sewage Treatment, and Waste Disposal 183 Palau 185 Power and
    [Show full text]
  • Sovereignty As Currency for Oceania's Island States Lizzie Yarina
    PEER REVIEW Micro- state- craft: Sovereignty as Currency for Oceania’s Island States Lizzie Yarina KEYWORDS Pacific Islands, Oceania, Sovereignty, Statecraft, Microstates Islas del Pacífico, Oceania, soberanía, política, micro-estados Yarina, Lizzie. 2019. “Microstatecraft: Sovereignty as Currency for Oceania’s Island States.” informa 12: 216–231. informa Issue #12 ‘Site Conditions’ 217 SOVEREIGNTY AS CURRENCY FOR OCEANIA’S ISLAND STATES Lizzie Yarina ABSTRACT population and dry ground. The smallest, Nauru, has only 10,000 people inhabiting a single 10- The sovereign archipelagos of the Pacific represent square kilometer island, much of which is no longer the distinctive typology of the ‘microstate.’ Emerging inhabitable as the result of phosphate mining. The in the global post-colonial era, they are many of combined surface area of these island microstates the smallest countries in the world in terms of both is similar to that of Rhode Island, as is the sum of population and land area. Still, as independent their 11 gross domestic products, or GDPs. Still, as states, each has earned a seat in the United Nations independent countries, each maintains a seat in the General Assembly, and other trappings of transna- United Nations General Assembly and all of the other tionally recognized sovereignty. This essay explores trappings of transnationally recognized sovereignty. the microstatecraft of Pacific Island nations—dis- This article explores the currency of sovereignty for tinct transnational negotiations made possible, Pacific microstates, and examines potential risks and desirable, or necessary by the unique characteristics opportunities associated with this ‘microstatecraft.’ of these small island, big ocean states. In particular, microstatecraft refers to the opportunities created In her book Extrastatecraft: the Power of Infrastruc- for these countries by leveraging their very status ture Space, architectural and urban theorist Keller as states.
    [Show full text]
  • Gubert and Ellice Islanders on Queensland Canefields, 1894-1899
    449 GUbert and Ellice Islanders on Queensland Canefields, 1894-1899 by Doug Munro Presented at a meeting of the Society 26 September 1991 During the mid-1890s the arrival of a labour recruiting vessel at a Queensland port would have caused no great excitement in the normal course of events. By then the labour trade in indentured Pacific Island or 'Kanaka' workers (overwhelmingly Melanesians) had been in progress for over thirty years involving more than 650 recruiting voyages; during that time some 50,000 three-year contracts of indenture had been entered into by Pacific Islanders, who formed the mainstay of the Queensland canefields labour force.' The vast majority were prevented by legislation from working in any capacity other than unskilled field labour in the sugar industry, and were supplemented by Asian labourers. Even the problem of labour turnover and finding replacements for the workers whose three-year contracts had expired was to some extent overcome by the numbers who opted to stay on and serve out further contracts. Known as time- expired workers, they comprised between one-half and two-thirds of the Pacific Islander population for most of the 1890s.and formed a sort of Kanaka "aristocracy of labour".^ Why, then, did the arrival of the three-masted schooner May at Bundaberg in January 1895 with a mere 74 labour recruits from the Gilbert and Ellice Islands arouse such widespread interest? On the face of it the sugar industry had all the labourers it needed, and an additional 74 labourers would make no appreciable difference to the 8,000 or so Pacific Island labourers were already in the colony.
    [Show full text]
  • Migratory Habits of Accounting Technology to Kiribati
    Draft 12 November 2017 Circumstances of a Pacific atoll people in diaspora: A retrospective analysis of I-Nikunau Keith Dixon University of Canterbury Contact details: Keith Dixon Department of Accounting and Information Systems Te Kura Umanga o Te Whare Wānanga o Waitaha (UCBS) University of Canterbury (Te Whare Wānanga o Waitaha) Private Bag 4800 Christchurch 8040 New Zealand Tel: +64 (0)3 3693844 Email: [email protected] Acknowledgements The assistance is much appreciated of many I-Nikunau and other I-Kiribati, including Tiarum O’Connor, and officials of the Nikunau Island Council, Te Kabowi n Aomata (the Nikunau Island Magistrates Court), Te Kabowi n Aba (the Nikunau Island Lands Court), Te Bobotin Nikunau (the Nikunau Cooperative Society) and Kiribati National Archives. Some participant-observer empirical materials derive from 1997–99 when the researcher was working for the Governments of Kiribati and the United Kingdom: the views expressed in the paper are those of the researcher and do not necessarily represent those of either government. A grant from the University of Canterbury to allow the researcher to visit Nikunau and Tarawa in 2009 is acknowledged. Comments on earlier versions of this paper from Hegnes Dixon, Dick Overy and two anonymous reviewers associated with the 8th Australasian Conference on Social and Environmental Accounting Research in Christchurch are appreciated, as are comments from participants at that conference and the 11th Conference of the European Society for Oceanists in Munich. I also thank the late Michael Gaffikin for providing some direction to the study of which this paper is part. 1 Abstract Life for people on many atolls is undoubtedly hard, frequently affected by droughts, rough seas and other adverse climatic conditions to name a few.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Nations: Colonial Bordering, Exploitation, and Indigenous Nation-Building in Kiribati and Tuvalu
    Water Nations: Colonial Bordering, Exploitation, and Indigenous Nation-Building in Kiribati and Tuvalu David Chappell University of Hawai`i at Mānoa Roniti Teiwaki (1988: 3) of Kiribati has called his country a “Nation of Water,” because its 33 islands comprise only 700 square kilometers of land compared to three million square kilometers of ocean. The concept also reminds us of Epeli Hau`ofa’s (1994) essay, “Our Sea of Islands,” in which he emphasized a history of indigenous voyaging and holistic networking in Oceania to acquire resources, thus disproving outsider views of Pacific islands as tiny, powerless dots, because they used the ocean for food and sailing routes for travel. The 1982 UN Law of the Sea, with its 200 nautical mile exclusive economic zones (EEZ) is a more legalistic maritime metaphor that empowers countries like Kiribati to negotiate with foreign fishing companies. In fact, the country’s syncretic name is itself a product of nation-building within a British framework that was known as the Gilbert and Ellice Islands Colony, or GEIC. In the 1930s, British officials tried to choose a less cumbersome name for the GEIC. The Gilbert Islands were named after a British transporter of convicts to Australia, and the Ellice Islands after a British merchant and politician. Critics called the arbitrary collection of atolls scattered across the central Pacific the “Gilbert and Sullivans,” a reference to two musical comedy composers. One official offered the term Quateria, since the main inhabited archipelago extended north and south of the equator and east and west of the dateline. Indigenous names such as Tungaru and Tuvalu existed, but none of those labels encompassed the mostly uninhabited islands in the Phoenix and Line groups, or Banaba (Ocean Island), whose phosphates provided half of the GEIC’s tax revenue (PIM 7/1966).
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape and Identity in Kiribati
    Jana Gheuens Landscape and Identity in Kiribati Master’s thesis in Global Environmental History 2 Abstract Gheuens, J. 2017. Landscape and Identity in Kiribati. Uppsala, Dept. of Archaeology and Ancient History. In this thesis, I will look into the relationship between landscape and identity on the island nation of Kiribati, a low lying island nation in the Micronesian region of the Pacific that is currently under threat by climate change. Based on qualitative research from several islands in Kiribati (semi-structured interviews and observations), I explore how landscape and landscape changes, identity, and present and future challenges are perceived by Kiribati residents. Landscape is more than just physical surroundings, encompassing qualities of heritage, memory, skills, knowledge and learning, and there is a strong link between landscape and identity for Kiribati islanders. Respondents stressed the importance of community and the ‘simple life’ as important qualities of life in Kiribati. People still come together frequently in their communities where they discuss issues such as building a new house for someone. Communities have as main purpose helping each other and are based on strong bonds of love and friendship. Respondents defined the simple life as a life without violence, without having to worry about money, without any major natural disasters (apart from climate change), and a life in which people are open and friendly to everyone. When it comes to present and future challenges, most respondents were worried about issues related to environmental changes such as changes in fresh water resources and coastal erosion. Although many respondents felt the effect of these environmental changes and people have become more aware of the link between those and global warming, many residents remained sceptical towards climate change, simply because believing it would make it real.
    [Show full text]
  • Kiribati Migration to New Zealand: Experience, Needs and Aspirations
    Kiribati migration to New Zealand: experience, needs and aspirations Prepared for the Presbyterian Church of Aotearoa New Zealand By Matt Gillard and Lisa Dyson for Impact Research 1 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. 3 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 Method ............................................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Establishing contact ...................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Preparation for data collection ..................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Participant recruitment ................................................................................................................. 5 2.4 Key informant interviews .............................................................................................................. 5 2.5 Focus groups ................................................................................................................................. 6 2.6 Confidentiality and security of data .............................................................................................. 7 2.7 Analysis ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Ecology in Kiribati: Linking Past with Present1
    Historical Ecology in Kiribati: Linking Past with Present1 Frank R. Thomas2 Abstract: Compared with ‘‘high’’ islands, atolls and table reefs have received lit- tle attention from archaeologists focusing on historical ecology in Oceania. Limited archaeological investigations in the three archipelagoes composing the Republic of Kiribati (Gilbert, Phoenix, and Line Groups) reflect primarily cul- ture historical reconstructions. Given the unique environmental challenges posed by coral islands, their potential for prehistoric ecological research should be recognized. By contrast, the last 50 years have witnessed a host of environ- mental studies, from agricultural improvements to sea-level rise and contempo- rary human impact on terrestrial and marine resources. In an attempt to better understand the influence of natural and human-induced processes in the more distant past, this paper explores several themes of relevance to coral islands in general. These include (1) natural and anthropogenic change on geomorphol- ogy and ecosystems, (2) anthropogenic impacts on faunal resources, (3) environ- mental evidence for human colonization, (4) interisland exchange networks and population mobility, and (5) social evolution. As islands formed by biogenic agents (un- Although coral islands have been the fo- consolidated carbonate sediments deposited cus of detailed ethnographic research begin- by waves on reef platforms), atolls and table ning in the early decades of the twentieth reefs, or low coral islands without lagoons, century (e.g., Buck 1932a,b, Beaglehole and can be regarded as especially constraining Beaglehole 1938, Kra¨mer and Nevermann habitats for human communities (Bayliss- 1938), archaeological coverage was mainly Smith 1977, Brady 1978, Liew 1990). The concerned in documenting surface remains challenges faced by human populations, both (Emory 1934a,b, 1939).
    [Show full text]