DOCSLIB.ORG

Kiribati.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kiribati.Pdf Kiribati Takuia Uakeia Kiribati is a small island nation composed of 33 islands in the Central Western Pacific lying astride the equator. It has three island groups: the Gilbert Islands (16 islands), Line Islands (9 islands), and Phoenix Islands (8 islands). The country extends 800 kilometres from north to south and 3,200 kilometres from east to west. The islands, situated on top of extinct undersea volcanic mountains, are made up of limestone, sand and rubble, with a soil very poor in plant nutrients. The highest point above sea level is around three metres, apart from Banaba, formerly known as Ocean Island, which is a raised coral atoll. Although Kiribati has a land area of only 810 square kilometres, the great distances separating the islands comprising the nation have generated a vast Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of more than 4.8 million square kilometres, one of the world’s largest. Background Before contact with Europeans the people (I-Kiribati) lived in extended family groups on isolated islands, with a subsistence, communal lifestyle and limited contact with the outside world. The values embraced in these poorly resourced islands included sharing, helping one another and moderation of needs within the community. The people lived in clans where the old men were (and still are) regarded as leaders of the family and custodians of the traditional culture. Individual members of the family Takuia Uakeia, formerly a member of the Kiribati Public Service (including three years as a Clerk of Parliament), is a Lecturer in Education at the University of the South Pacific, Kiribati Campus. 118 Kiribati 119 held different assigned roles to be carried out for the proper functioning and continuity of the culture. In 1604, islands of the Gilbert Group were first sighted by the Spanish explorer Pedro Fernandes de Queirós; however, British Captain Thomas Gilbert was the first European to document these islands in 1788 and the islands were named after him. Three decades later, the islands were visited by beachcombers, whalers, traders, blackbirders, missionaries and, finally, British administrators. The contact with Europeans was a period of wonder but caused feelings of both hatred and acceptance. On the positive side, outsiders were accepted for introducing beneficial ideas; missionaries invented the alphabet of the Kiribati language and traders introduced modern tools. On the negative side were firearms, new diseases, and practices such as smoking and prostitution. The introduction of a new government system by British administrators was seen by the elderly as in conflict with local culture and tradition. The appointment of a younger generation to posts such as island magistrates and constables was contrary to traditional practices. Consequently, it took quite a long time for people to fully participate. The ‘contact’ events showed I-Kiribati how a stronger foreign power can interfere with political, social and economic life. This lesson can still be seen with the domination of larger and more powerful countries over small island states. The traditional political system The maneaba, a multi-purpose meeting hall, is the centre of the traditional political system in the village. It is here that the old men, by virtue of their status, come and occupy their sitting positions and make decisions about the affairs of the community. These discussions and decisions are intended to promote the well-being of the people and the strengthening of order and peace in the community. The decisions from the maneaba, based on lengthy discussions, are taken by consensus among the Unimwane (old men) and are then passed on to the community for implementation. While families have the right to decide matters in their homes, the maneaba system exists for the purpose of making just decisions for the benefit of everyone in the community. There are no political parties in the maneaba system; every old 120 Pacific Ways man has to contribute to framing decisions for the people’s benefit. The system reflects a consciousness of limited resources and illustrates a monoculture in islands where the people speak only one language, the Kiribati language (Te Taetae-ni-Kiribati). By tradition, young men and women are never involved in the decision-making but are regarded as central in the implementation of decisions coming out from the maneaba. The importance of the maneaba can never be underestimated in the current Western political system because it represents the entire life of the community. The maneaba system can effectively facilitate order and stability in the society, as well as the dissemination and implementation of government policies by the community. The new political system The acceptance by the I-Kiribati of a Western, democratic political system for the government of the nation was evidenced in the adoption of the country’s constitution at independence on 12 July 1979. The constitution marked a turning point: from traditional, isolated, island- oriented government by a Council of Unimwane through the maneaba system, to citizenship in a nation under a central government. The new system differed enormously from the traditional system as it was based on formal, structured institutions, procedures, rules and laws, requiring capable citizens with specified Western knowledge and skills, and huge resources for its effective operation. Some of the concepts relating to the new political system remain too complex to be understood by those with limited education, requiring greater community engagement and inclusion in the country’s senior secondary school curriculum. The new political system was based on the ‘separation of powers’ between the three arms of government: the legislature, the executive and the judiciary. The division of powers is stipulated in the constitution and clearly emphasises the notion that a government under a democratic system cannot exist without true independence of the legislature, the executive and the judiciary. Checks and balances are provided when power is divided: the legislature makes the laws; the executive enforces them; and the judiciary interprets them. Despite this model, there are times where people feel that the executive extends its jurisdiction for political purposes and reaches the boundaries Kiribati 121 of the legislature and judiciary. This reflects the executive’s dominance over both the legislature and the judiciary, in part through the election of the Speaker and the appointment of the head of the judiciary (the chief justice) by the Beretitenti (president). More broadly, the executive can be influential by taking steps that suit the Cabinet’s political agenda. Most elected governments in Kiribati are stable, surviving three consecutive four-year terms (in accordance with mandatory term limits), governing the nation with a parliamentary majority. Figure 1: The Three Constitutional Organs of the Government of Kiribati Source: Takuia Uakeia, Governance issues Affecting Development in Kiribati, PhD thesis, 2012 The election process The election structures and processes employed follow the usual forms found in Western democratic countries. These include the establishment of an electoral bureaucracy to run elections, including procedures for nomination of candidates and the conduct of voting with proper supervision and safeguards. Multi-member constituencies are defined based on the latest five-yearly census. There is one elected member for islands with fewer than 1,500 people, two members for islands with between 1,500 and 5,000 people, and three members for constituencies with more than 5,000 people. There are 46 members of the legislature: 44 elected for a four-year term; one appointed member from the Banaban community on Rabi Island (in Fiji); and the attorney-general. 122 Pacific Ways Kiribati has a two-round voting system. A candidate who receives more than 50 per cent of the valid votes is declared elected. When no candidate receives a majority, a second round is conducted, restricted to the leading candidates. Citizens are eligible to vote if they are at least 18 years old and registered. Despite legislation designed to prevent vote- buying by candidates, cultural values and family ties still have a strong influence on voting behaviour. In most outer islands, during campaigns it is normal for candidates to visit each household and bubuti (plead) with members of close-knit families to vote for them. Some candidates could be said to commence their campaigns years before an election, making ‘donations’ and providing other forms of assistance to an island or village in the hope and expectation of attracting votes. Local issues, rather than national policies, are a powerful influence on remote islands where voters have had limited educational opportunities. Following the announcement of election results, the 44 successful candidates will commence consolidation of political groupings based on shared interests. Political parties Political parties exist in the Parliament but do not have entrenched ideologies connecting to the wider population. The culture has long nurtured consensual decision-making in the maneaba system rather than the adversarial approach so evident in Western countries. In addition, the strong traditional lifestyles in villages on scattered isolated islands pose difficulties for efforts to mobilise nationwide political party movements. Emulating democratic governments in developed nations, elected members in Kiribati have adopted ways to form groupings based on ‘shared interests’ rather than deep-rooted
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kiribati Bilateral Relations
    India-Kiribati Bilateral Relations Background The concurrent accreditation of Kiribati was transferred to High Commission of India, Suva in October 2011. Prior to that High Commission in Wellington was concurrently accredited to Kiribati from September 1992. High-Level Exchanges FIPIC: The Forum for India-Pacific Island Countries was inaugurated on 19 November 2014 at Suva. Hon’ble Prime Minister of India also hosted the First Summit of the Forum in Suva (Fiji) during his historic visit to Fiji on 19 November 2014. The Forum saw participation of 14 Pacific Island Countries. Kiribati delegation was led by former President Hon. Anote Tong, attended the Summit. FIPIC-II: As a follow-up of the historic first FIPIC Summit in 2014, India organized the second FIPIC at Jaipur on 21 August 2015, which was hosted by Hon’ble Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Building upon the success of the first FIPIC, India announced major initiatives to boost cooperation with the 14 Pacific Island countries. Kiribati delegation led by Mr. Teekoa luta, Advisor on Asia, attended the Forum. Interaction with PSIDS at New York: On 24 September 2019, on the sidelines of the UNGA, Prime Minister of India Hon. Narendra Modi held an interaction, first of its kind, with the leaders of the Pacific Small Island Developing States (PSIDS). This high-level exchange will be followed up with the third Summit meeting of the Forum for India-Pacific Islands Cooperation (FIPIC), which is scheduled to be held in the first half of 2020. India-Pacific Islands Sustainable Development Conference (IPISDC): Government of India organized the India-Pacific Islands Sustainable Development Conference (IPISDC) at Suva, Fiji on 25-26 May 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Leadership in the Constitution of the Marshall Islands
    TRADITIONAL LEADERSHIP IN THE CONSTITUTION OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS by C. J. LYNCH Working Papers Series Pacific Islands Studies Center for Asian and Pacific Studies in collaboration with the Social Science Research Institute University of Hawaii at Manoa Honolulu, Hawaii Joe Lynch is a consultant on legislation and constitutional drafting whose long experience in the Pacific encompasses island areas in Micronesia, Melanesia, and Polynesia. Robert C. Kiste, Director Pacific Islands Studies Program Center for Asian and Pacific Studies University of Hawaii at Manoa Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 TRADITIONAL LEADERSHIP IN THE CONSTITUTION OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS (With Comparative Notes) C. J. Lynch 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface v Introductory 1 Part I. THE COUNCIL OF IROIJ l. The precursors 3 2. Functions of the Council 4 (a) General 4 (b) Relations with the Nitijela 6 ( c) The Council in action 9 3. Composition of the Council 10 4. Procedures of the Council 13 5. Miscellaneous matters 14 6. Comparisons 16 (a) Palau 16 (b) The Federated States of Micronesia 17 (c) Yap 18 (d) Vanuatu 21 (e) Western Samoa 22 (f) The Cook Islands 22 (g) Comment 24 Part II. THE TRADITIONAL RIGHTS COURT 7. The Traditional Rights Court and the judicial system 27 ADDENDUM: Two problems of interpretation 8. Comparisons and comment 34 Part III. CONCLUSION 9. General comments 35 10. Is a traditional input desirable? 37 APPENDIX 42 NOTES 43 iii PREFACE It hardly needs to be said that this paper is written by a lawyer and from a lawyer's point of view. This fact, however , necessarily means that it is selective, firstly in the aspects of its subject that are considered and secondly in the detail (especially on non-legal aspects) into which it goes.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and Challenges to Self- Determination
    THE YALE LAW JOURNAL FORUM FEBRUARY 24, 2020 Climate Change and Challenges to Self- Determination: Case Studies from French Polynesia and the Republic of Kiribati Tekau Frere, Clement Yow Mulalap & Tearinaki Tanielu abstract. This Essay examines the nexus of climate change (including related natural phe- nomena such as ocean acidification) and self-determination, particularly for low-lying atoll states and other entities at the front lines of climate change. The Essay begins by briefly surveying the current state of international law and literature on self-determination. The authors adopt a view of the right of peoples to self-determination as a jus cogens norm, which all members of the inter- national community are obligated to respect and uphold for all peoples. The Essay highlights the linkages between that view of self-determination and the enjoyment of several core human rights that are dependent on a healthy environment. Prominent among these is the right of a people, under international law, to freely dispose of their natural resources as they see fit, in pursuit of that people’s economic, social, political, and cultural development. The Essay then unpacks this argu- ment by examining two case studies. The first case study centers on French Polynesia, where peo- ple’s vulnerabilities to climate change and related natural phenomena hamper their right to freely dispose of their natural resources. The second case study examines the Republic of Kiribati, where climate change and related natural phenomena pose a risk to the Republic’s status as a state, at least under a classic conception of international law, because they have led to a defeatist narrative regarding the Republic’s future.
    [Show full text]
  • The Partition of the Gilbert and Ellice Islands W
    Island Studies Journal , Vol. 7, No.1, 2012, pp. 135-146 REVIEW ESSAY The Partition of the Gilbert and Ellice Islands W. David McIntyre Macmillan Brown Centre for Pacific Studies Christchurch, New Zealand [email protected] ABSTRACT : This paper reviews the separation of the Ellice Islands from the Gilbert and Ellice Islands Colony, in the central Pacific, in 1975: one of the few agreed boundary changes that were made during decolonization. Under the name Tuvalu, the Ellice Group became the world’s fourth smallest state and gained independence in 1978. The Gilbert Islands, (including the Phoenix and Line Islands), became the Republic of Kiribati in 1979. A survey of the tortuous creation of the colony is followed by an analysis of the geographic, ethnic, language, religious, economic, and administrative differences between the groups. When, belatedly, the British began creating representative institutions, the largely Polynesian, Protestant, Ellice people realized they were doomed to permanent minority status while combined with the Micronesian, half-Catholic, Gilbertese. To protect their identity they demanded separation, and the British accepted this after a UN-observed referendum. Keywords: Foreign and Commonwealth Office; Gilbert and Ellis islands; independence; Kiribati; Tuvalu © 2012 Institute of Island Studies, University of Prince Edward Island, Canada Context The age of imperialism saw most of the world divided up by colonial powers that drew arbitrary lines on maps to designate their properties. The age of decolonization involved the assumption of sovereign independence by these, often artificial, creations. Tuvalu, in the central Pacific, lying roughly half-way between Australia and Hawaii, is a rare exception.
    [Show full text]
  • Kiribati Review of Natural Resource and Environment
    Republic of Kiribati: Review of Environmental Legislation 1 KIRIBATI REVIEW OF NATURAL RESOURCE AND ENVIRONMENT RELATED LEGISLATION Prepared by Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) and EDO NSW January 2018 Republic of Kiribati: Review of Environmental Legislation 2 SPREP Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Kiribati : review of natural resource and environment related legislation. Apia, Samoa : SPREP, 2018. 15 p. 29 cm. ISBN: 978-982-04-0877-7 1. Environmental policy – Kiribati. 2. Environment – Protection – Kiribati. 3. Environmental law – Kiribati. 4. Conservation of natural resources – Law and legislative – Kiribati. I. Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP). II. Title. 344.04609681 Republic of Kiribati: Review of Environmental Legislation 3 INTRODUCTORY NOTE The following review, prepared jointly by the Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environmental Programme (SPREP) and the Environmental Defenders Office Ltd (EDO NSW), updates and builds on the reviews conducted in the early 2000s under the International Waters Project. The review offers a brief overview of environmental legislation in force in each Pacific Island country identified and is current as of January 2018. A number of sources were referenced for this update, including: Prior reviews prepared by SPREP; Pacific Islands Legal Information Institute – Paclii; ECOLEX - an information service on environmental law, operated jointly by FAO, IUCN and UNEP; and Government websites. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this review, no guarantee is given, nor responsibility taken, by SPREP or the EDO NSW for its accuracy, currency or completeness. SPREP and EDO NSW do not accept any responsibility for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the information contained in this review.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Acquisition and Loss of Citizenship
    COMPARATIVE REPORT 2020/01 COMPARATIVE FEBRUARY REGIONAL 2020 REPORT ON CITIZENSHIP LAW: OCEANIA AUTHORED BY ANNA DZIEDZIC © Anna Dziedzic, 2020 This text may be downloaded only for personal research purposes. Additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copies or electronically, requires the consent of the authors. If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the year and the publisher. Requests should be addressed to [email protected]. Views expressed in this publication reflect the opinion of individual authors and not those of the European University Institute. Global Citizenship Observatory (GLOBALCIT) Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies in collaboration with Edinburgh University Law School Comparative Regional Report on Citizenship Law: Oceania RSCAS/GLOBALCIT-Comp 2020/1 February 2020 Anna Dziedzic, 2020 Printed in Italy European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) www.eui.eu/RSCAS/Publications/ cadmus.eui.eu Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies The Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, created in 1992 and currently directed by Professor Brigid Laffan, aims to develop inter-disciplinary and comparative research on the major issues facing the process of European integration, European societies and Europe’s place in 21st century global politics. The Centre is home to a large post-doctoral programme and hosts major research programmes, projects and data sets, in addition to a range of working groups and ad hoc initiatives. The research agenda is organised around a set of core themes and is continuously evolving, reflecting the changing agenda of European integration, the expanding membership of the European Union, developments in Europe’s neighbourhood and the wider world.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Sector Development in the Pacific Developing Member Countries
    TABLE OF CONTENTS i FINANCIAL SECTOR DEVELOPMENT IN THE PACIFIC DEVELOPING MEMBER COUNTRIES Volume Two Country Reports Financial Sector Development in the Pacific Developing Member ii Countries: Country Reports © Asian Development Bank 2001 All rights reserved. First published in September 2001. This report was prepared by consultants for the Asian Development Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in it do not necessarily represent the views of ADB or those of its member governments. The Asian Development Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in the publication and accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any consequences of their use. ISBN 971-561-392-6 Publication Stock No. 080401 Asian Development Bank P.O. Box 789, 0980 Manila Philippines Website: www.adb.org TABLE OF CONTENTS iii Abbreviations ADB Asian Development Bank ALTA Agricultural Landlord and Tenant Act, Fiji Islands AMU Asset Management Unit ANZ ANZ Bank, Australia and New Zealand Banking Group APRA Australian Prudential Regulation Authority ATHL Amalgamated Telecom Holdings (Fiji Islands) ATM Automatic Teller Machine AusAID Australian Agency for International Development BOK Bank of Kiribati BOT Bank of Tonga BPNG Bank of Papua New Guinea BSP Bank of South Pacific, Papua New Guinea CBS Central Bank of Samoa CBSI Central Bank of Solomon Islands CMDA Capital Market Development Authority (Fiji Islands) CNB Colonial National Bank (Fiji Islands) CPI Consumer Price Index CPSF Civil Service Pension Fund, Tonga DBK Development Bank of
    [Show full text]
  • Amerimuncvi BG Kiribati.Pdf
    © 2018 American University Model United Nations Conference All rights reserved. No part of this background guide may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means whatsoever without express written permission from the American University Model United Nations Conference Secretariat. Please direct all questions to [email protected] Hayden Schutt Co-Chair Hello Delegates, Welcome to AmeriMUNC and the Kiribati committee! My name is Hayden Schutt, and I will be one of your co-chairs this session. Abby and I are so excited to meet all of you and to get started! Whether this is your first conference or last, I completely understand all of the emotions that can go along with stepping into a new environment or saying goodbye to something that has been very impactful on your life. I am a freshman here at American University and am currently pursuing a major in CLEG (Communications, Economics, Law, and Government). I call Minnesota my home, so please feel free to laugh or acknowledge my accent that becomes present whenever I say words with“long vowel” sounds (*Bagel, Bag, *Minnesota, etc.)! While in high school back in MN, I was heavily involved in the YMCA’s Youth in Government program. As a senior, I served as the YMCA’s Youth Governor for their Minnesota program and attended many state and national conferences. Government is one of my passions, and I am looking forward to going back to Model United Nations with all of you! Throughout this conference, I encourage you to step outside of your comfort zone and challenge yourself.
    [Show full text]
  • New Impulses in the Interaction of Law and Religion: a South Pacific Perspective
    BYU Law Review Volume 2003 | Issue 2 Article 6 5-1-2003 New Impulses in the Interaction of Law and Religion: A South Pacific eP rspective Don Paterson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, and the Religion Law Commons Recommended Citation Don Paterson, New Impulses in the Interaction of Law and Religion: A South Pacific erP spective, 2003 BYU L. Rev. 593 (2003). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol2003/iss2/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Brigham Young University Law Review at BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Law Review by an authorized editor of BYU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PAT-FIN 5/31/2003 1:23 PM New Impulses in the Interaction of Law and Religion: A South Pacific Perspective Don Paterson∗ I. INTRODUCTION This article will look at the way in which new religions were introduced first from Britain and Europe and then later from the United States of America into all island countries of the South Pacific during the nineteenth century. The next part will examine the extent to which the laws of those countries provide freedom of religion and it will then consider certain legal and sociological limitations upon the actual practice of religion in these same countries. The article will conclude by looking to the future and trying to suggest ways to ease the tension that exists between individual freedom to practice the religion of his or her choice and community concern for preserving peace and harmony in the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening Statement at the High-Level Event On
    United Nations Nations Unies T HE PRESIDENT OF THE GEN ERAL ASSEMBLY LE PRESIDENT DE L’AS SEMBLEE GENERALE 29 June 2015 Statement of H.E. Mr. Sam Kahamba Kutesa, President of the 69th Session of the General Assembly, at the Opening of the High-Level Event on Climate Change Your Excellency, Mr. Anote Tong, President of the Republic of Kiribati, Honourable Ministers, Excellencies, Mr. Secretary-General, Distinguished delegates, Ladies and gentlemen, I am pleased to welcome you all to this High-level Event on Climate Change. I particularly welcome His Excellency, Mr. Anote Tong, President of the Republic of Kiribati, and the Honourable Ministers joining us today. The presence of so many high-level participants and the active engagement of Member States show the importance we collectively attach to addressing climate change. One of the key priorities I selected for the 69th session is climate change. In my acceptance speech in June last year I underscored that climate change is one of the defining global challenges of our times and that this session would give impetus to the ongoing process under UNFCCC. This high-level event, at the mid-point between the twentieth Conference of the Parties on Climate Change (COP 20), held in Lima, and COP 21, to be held in Paris, provides a unique opportunity to take stock of the work done so far and keep the momentum towards reaching an ambitious and universally- binding climate change agreement. It will also aim to promote climate action to slow global warming and limit greenhouse gas emissions (GHG), through concrete initiatives and multi-stakeholder approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Instability in TUVALU & NAURU
    By Lisepa Paeniu Outline The issue of instability Parliamentary structures of both countries Options that could be introduced Executive Instability Motions of vote of no confidence in the Head of Government MPs defect from Government to join Opposition Instability includes: Different HoG A change in the Ministerial portfolios of Cabinet, or a new Cabinet altogether or just a new PM/President Tuvalu Year Prime Minister 1978-1981 Toaribi Lauti 1981-89 Tomasi Puapua 1989-92 Bikenibeu Paeniu 1993-96 Kamuta Latasi 1996-99 Bikenibeu Paeniu 1999-2000 Ionatana Ionatana 2000-2001 Faimalaga Luka 2001-2002 Koloa Talake 2002-04 Saufatu Sopoaga 2006-2010 Apisai Ielemia 2010 Maatia Toafa 2010-11 Willy Telavi Why is exec instability an issue? Economy suffers Lack of continuity of policies International obligations Implementation of reforms inconsistent Termination of civil servants Public confidence undermined Political Systems in Tuvalu and Nauru Westminister parliamentary systems Nauru has 18 MPs,Tuvalu has 15 MPs No formal political party system Both have HoG selected by majority in Parliament Speakers are elected as MPs No control/consequence for MPs that cross the floor No limit on when an MP tables a motion of no confidence Options 1. People to vote for PM directly (Kiribati Constitution) Section 32 of the Constitution 1979 – 1991 H.E Ieremia Tabai, GCMG (Nonouti) 1991-1994 H.E Teatao Teannaki (Abaiang) 1994-2002 H.E Teburoro Tito (South Tarawa) 2003- current H.E Anote Tong (Maiana) 2. The office of the Speaker filled by a non-elected MP (Niue Constitution) Options 2 3. MP who crosses floor to resign from Parliament and a by- election to be held (Electoral Act 1967 Samoa) 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Appointment and Removal of the Head of Government of the Kiribati Republic
    The Appointment and Removal of the Head of Government of the Kiribati Republic. A Report for Daphne Caine MHK, October 2019. Professor Peter W Edge, School of Law, Oxford Brookes University. [email protected] Professor Jennifer Corrin, Centre for Public International and Comparative Law, The University of Queensland Law School. [email protected] Professor Claire de Than, Jersey Law Commission. [email protected] Creative Commons License: BY-NC-ND I. Executive Summary. This report examines the unique arrangements for the appointment and removal of the President of the Pacific state of Kiribati, in the context of political, historical and social factors. It outlines the potential for similar mechanisms to be introduced in the Isle of Man, while remaining aware of the significance of the constitutional, geographical and cultural differences between the two jurisdictions. The report concludes that the dual effect of a vote of no confidence in Kiribati’s model, which triggers not only a new Presidential election but also a fresh general election for the legislature, provides a measure of balance between competing democratic mandates. However it is not the only option, and refinements could be made. Requiring a special majority for a vote of no confidence in the President without triggering a general election may also be considered. Attention should also be paid to identifying the desirable number of presidential candidates, and to how they are to be nominated. II. Kiribati and its Constitutional Development. Kiribati, officially the Republic of Kiribati, is a sovereign state in the Pacific, constituting 33 islands spread over 3 million km in the central Pacific Ocean, with more than one third of the 72,000 population living on one island.1 It is categorized as part of Micronesia, which includes other island archipelagos, such as Nauru and the Federated States of Micronesia.
    [Show full text]