List of Data Producer Codes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

List of Data Producer Codes List of Data Producer Codes This document was generated on : 24 September 2021 Date of last change to S-62 : 13 July 2021 A cumulative list of all major changes to the list of Data Producer Codes (new or removed producers; changed numeric or alpha Agency Codes) is maintained here Data Producer Codes i Foreword A list of ENC producer agency codes was originally published in November 1996 as Annex A to S-57 Appendix A, under the title "IHO Codes for Producing Agencies". Because the list of producer codes is liable to revision more frequently than the S-57 standard, it was subsequently decided to publish the list of ENC producer codes in a stand-alone IHO publication S-62 - List of Data Producer Codes. After the publication of IHO S-100 and the associated S-100 Geospatial Information Registry, it was decided to manage and maintain all producer codes in data producer code registers within the registry. The data producer code register is divided into a main register for producer codes allocated to States or groups of States for the production of officially authorised nautical products meeting the requirements of marine navigation as laid down in the Convention on the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) Chapter V, and a supplementary register for producer codes allocated to other organisations and entities. Most of the producer codes in the supplementary register were previously maintained on the Open ECDIS Forum. S-62 24 September 2021 This version created on 24 September 2021 ii Data Producer Codes TABLE OF CONTENTS I. IHO Member States1 II. Other States6 III. Other Organizations/Entities9 S-62 24 September 2021 This version created on 24 September 2021 1 Data Producer Codes I. IHO Member States Country Name Country Agency Name Agency Codes Code Argentina AR Servicio de Hidrografía Naval (SHN) 1 AR Australia AU Australian Hydrographic Office (AHO) 10 AU Australia AU Australian Hydrographic Office - Defence 11 AN forces Bahrain BH Hydrographic Survey Office 20 BH Bangladesh BD Hydrographic Department 660 BD Belgium BE MDK – Afdeling Kust – Division Coast 30 BE Brazil BR Directorate of Hydrography and Navigation 40 BR (DHN) Brunei Darussalam BN Department of Marine 710 BN Brunei Darussalam BN Survey Department 715 B2 Bulgaria BG Hidrografska Sluzhba Pri Ministerstvo Na 720 BG Otbranata Cameroon CM Port Autonome de Douala (PAD) 740 CM Canada CA Canadian Hydrographic Service (CHS) 50 CA Canada CA Canadian Forces 51 C4 Chile CL Servicio Hidrográfico y Oceanográfico de la 60 CL Armada (SHOA) China CN Maritime Safety Administration (MSA) 70 CN China CN The Navigation Guarantee Department of 71 C1 The Chinese Navy Headquarters China CN Hong Kong Special Administrative Region 72 C2 China CN Macau Special Administrative Region 73 C3 Colombia CO Ministerio de Defensa Nacional 760 CO Congo (Dem. Rep. of) CD Ministère des Transports et Communications 590 CD Croatia HR Hrvatski Hidrografski Institut 80 HR Cuba CU Oficina Nacional de Hidrografia y Geodesia 90 CU Cyprus CY Hydrographic Unit of the Department of 100 CY Lands and Surveys Denmark DK Geodatastyrelsen (GST) 110 DK Denmark DK Farvandsvaesenet 111 D1 Denmark DK Umhvørvisstovan (Faroe Islands) 112 D2 Dominican Rep. DO Instituto Cartografico Militar 120 DO Ecuador EC Instituto Oceanográfico de la Armada 130 EC (INOCAR) Egypt EG Shobat al Misaha al Baharia 140 EG Estonia EE Estonian Maritime Administration (EMA) 870 EE Fiji FJ Fiji Islands Maritime Safety Administration 150 FJ (FIMSA) Finland FI Finnish Transport and Communications 160 FI Agency (Traficom) France FR Service Hydrographique et Océanographique 170 FR de la Marine (SHOM) Georgia GE State Hydrographic Service of Georgia 905 GE Germany DE Bundesamt für Seeschiffahrt und 180 DE Hydrographie (BSH) Ghana GH Ghana Ports and Harbours Authority 910 GH Greece GR Hellenic Navy Hydrographic Service 190 GR (HNHS) Guatemala GT Ministerio de la Defensa Nacional 200 GT Guatemala GT Comisión Portuaria Nacional 201 G1 S-62 24 September 2021 This version created on 24 September 2021 Data Producer Codes 2 Country Name Country Agency Name Agency Codes Code Guyana GY Maritime Administration Department 950 GY Hydrographic Office Iceland IS Icelandic Coast Guard 210 IS India IN National Hydrographic Office 220 IN India IN Indian Navy Specific 221 I7 Indonesia ID Jawatan Hidro-Oseanografi (JANHIDROS) 230 ID Ireland IE Maritime Safety Directorate 990 IE Islamic Rep. of Iran IR Ports and Shipping Organization (PSO) 240 IR Italy IT Istituto Idrografico della Marina (IIM) 250 IT Jamaica JM Surveys and Mapping Division 1010 JM Japan JP Japan Hydrographic and Oceanographic 260 JP Department (JHOD) Kenya KE Survey of Kenya, Kenya Ports Authority 1030 KE Korea (DPR of) KP Hydrographic Department 270 KP Korea (Rep. of) KR Korea Hydrographic and Oceanographic 280 KR Agency (KHOA) Kuwait KW Ministry of Communications 1050 KW Latvia LV Maritime Administration of Latvia 1060 LV Lebanon LB Lebanese Navy Hydrographic Service 1070 LB Malaysia MY National Hydrographic Centre 290 MY Malta MT Malta Maritime Authority Ports Directorate, 1140 MT Hydrographic Unit Mauritius MU Ministry of Housing and Land, 1170 MU Hydrographic Unit Mexico MX Secretaria de Marina – Armada de Mexico, 1180 MX Direccion General Adjunta de Oceanografia, Hidrografia y Meteorologia Monaco MC Direction des Affaires Maritimes 300 MC Montenegro ME Ministry of Defence, Navy Headquarters 1225 ME Montenegro ME Institute of Hydrometeorology and 1226 M1 Seismology Morocco MA Division Hydrographie et Cartographie 1200 MA (DHC) de la Marine Royale Mozambique MZ Instituto Nacional de Hidrografia e 1210 MZ Navegação (INAHINA) Myanmar MM Central Naval Hydrographic Depot (CNHD) 1220 MM Netherlands NL Koninklijke Marine Dienst der Hydrografie / 310 NL CZSK New Zealand NZ Land Information New Zealand (LINZ) 320 NZ New Zealand NZ Geospatial Intelligence New Zealand 321 N3 Nigeria NG Nigerian Navy Hydrographic Office 330 NG Norway NO Norwegian Hydrographic Service 340 NO Norway NO Electronic Chart Centre 341 N1 Norway NO Norwegian Defence 342 N2 Oman OM National Hydrographic Office 350 OM Pakistan PK Pakistan Hydrographic Department 360 PK Papua New Guinea PG Hydrographic Division, National Maritime 370 PG Safety Authority (NMSA) Peru PE Dirección de Hidrografía y Navegación 380 PE (DHN) Philippines PH National Mapping and Resource Information 390 PH Authority, Coast & Geodetic Survey Department Poland PL Biuro Hydrograficzne 400 PL S-62 24 September 2021 This version created on 24 September 2021 3 Data Producer Codes Country Name Country Agency Name Agency Codes Code Poland Inland Navigation Office in Szczecin (Urzad 401 P1 Zeglugi Srodladowej w Szczecinie) Portugal PT Instituto Hidrografico, Portugal (IHP) 410 PT Qatar QA Urban Planning & Development Authority, 1290 QA Hydrographic Section Romania RO Directia Hidrografica Maritima 1300 RO Russian Federation RU Head Department of Navigation & 420 RU Oceanography (DNO) Russian Federation RU Federal State Unitary Hydrographc 425 R1 Department Samoa WS Ministry of Transport, Marine and Shipping 1340 WS Division Saudi Arabia SA General Directorate of Military Survey 1360 SA (GDMS) Saudi Arabia SA General Commission for Survey (GCS) 1365 S1 Serbia RS Direkcija Za Unutrašnje Plovne Puteve 580 RS Seychelles SC Hydrographic and Topographic Brigade of 1380 SC the Seychelles Singapore SG Hydrographic Department, Maritime and 430 SG Port Authority (MPA) Slovenia SI Ministry of Transport Maritime Office 1400 SI Solomon Islands SB Solomon Islands Maritime Safety 1410 SB Administration (SIMSA) South Africa (Rep. of) ZA South African Navy Hydrographic Office 440 ZA (SANHO) Spain ES Instituto Hidrográfico de la Marina (IHM) 450 ES Sri Lanka LK National Hydrographic Office, National 460 LK Aquatic Resources Research and Development Agency (NARA) Suriname SR Maritieme Autoriteit Suriname (MAS) 470 SR Sweden SE Sjöfartsverket, Swedish Maritime 480 SE Administration Syrian Arab Republic SY General Directorate of Ports 490 SY Thailand TH Hydrographic Department, Royal Thai Navy 500 TH Tonga TO Tonga Defence Services 505 TO Trinidad & Tobago TT Trinidad & Tobago Hydrographic Unit 510 TT Tunisia TN Service Hydrographique et Océanographique 1470 TN (SHO), Armée de Mer Turkey TR Seyir, Hidrografi ve Osinografi Dairesi 520 TR Baskanligi, Office of Navigation, Hydrography and Oceanography UK GB United Kingdom Hydrographic Office 540 GB Ukraine UA State Hydrographic Service of Ukraine 1490 UA United Arab Emirates AE Ministry of Communications 530 AE Uruguay UY Oceanographic, Hydrographic and 560 UY Meteorological Service of the Uruguayan Navy USA US Office of Coast Survey, National Ocean 550 US Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOS) USA US National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency 551 U1 Department of Defense (NGA) USA US Commander, Naval Meteorology and 552 U2 Oceanography Command (CNMOC) USA US U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 553 U3 S-62 24 September 2021 This version created on 24 September 2021 Data Producer Codes 4 Country Name Country Agency Name Agency Codes Code USA US National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency 554 U4 Department of Defense (NGA) Vanuatu VU Vanuatu Hydrographic Unit 1500 VU Venezuela VE Commandancia General de la Armada, 570 VE Dirección de Hidrografía y Navegación (DHN) Viet Nam VN Viet Nam Maritime People's Navy 1510 VN Viet Nam VN Viet Nam Maritime Safety-North (VMS-N) 1511 V1 Viet Nam VN Viet Nam Maritime Safety-South (VMS-S) 1512 V2 S-62 24 September 2021 This version created on 24 September 2021 5 Data Producer Codes II. Other States
Recommended publications
  • Avoiding Another War Between Israel and Hezbollah
    COUNTING THE COST Avoiding Another War between Israel and Hezbollah By Nicholas Blanford and Assaf Orion “He who wishes to fight must first count the cost.” Sun Tzu, The Art of War ABOUT THE SCOWCROFT MIDDLE EAST SECURITY INITIATIVE The Atlantic Council’s Scowcroft Middle East Security Initiative honors the legacy of Brent Scowcroft and his tireless efforts to build a new security architecture for the region. Our work in this area addresses the full range of security threats and challenges including the danger of interstate warfare, the role of terrorist groups and other nonstate actors, and the underlying security threats facing countries in the region. Through all of the Council’s Middle East programming, we work with allies and partners in Europe and the wider Middle East to protect US interests, build peace and security, and unlock the human potential of the region. You can read more about our programs at www.atlanticcouncil.org/ programs/middle-east-programs/. May 2020 ISBN-13: 978-1-61977-099-7 This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Independence. The authors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council and its donors do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s conclusions. This report is made possible by general support to the Atlantic Council’s Middle East Programs. COUNTING THE COST Avoiding Another War between Israel and Hezbollah CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Building a New National Hydrographic Service: the Italian-Lebanese Collaboration
    Building A New National Hydrographic Service: The Italian-Lebanese Collaboration Lamberto Orlando LAMBERTI and Nicola Marco PIZZEGHELLO (Italy), Afif GHAITH, Elie el JBEILY and Christian FAHED (Lebanon) Key words: Capacity Building, Blue Growth, International Collaboration, Hydrography. SUMMARY The International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) defines Hydrography as the description of the physical features of the water portion of the earth's surface, connected with the “blue growth” and all marine activities. The importance of the marine sector will mount in Lebanon over the next decades. Institutions will be the critical enablers in order to achieve sustainable marine management. Hence, the need to strengthen the marine base knowledge, skills and capacities of individuals and organizations is becoming a priority. The capacity building project of the Lebanese Hydrographic Service was created together with Italy, with the Italian Hydrographic Institute as the main technical actor, in order to support Lebanon and guide it through the creation of an independent National Hydrographic Service within the international standards and become its own Primary Nautical Chart Authority (PCA). Giving to the nation of Lebanon an independent hydrographic capacity is essential as it enables the future growth of marine business. The article highlights already performed activities and future plans between Lebanon and Italy in order to build an independent Lebanese Hydrographic Service. Building a New National Hydrographic Service: the Italian-Lebanese Collaboration (9373) Nicola Marco Pizzeghello (Italy), Afif Ghaith (Lebanon), Lamberto Orlando Lamberti (Italy), Elie Jbeily and Christian Fahed (Lebanon) FIG Congress 2018 Embracing our smart world where the continents connect: enhancing the geospatial maturity of societies Istanbul, Turkey, May 6–11, 2018 Building A New National Hydrographic Service: The Italian-Lebanese Collaboration Lamberto Orlando Lamberti And Nicola Marco Pizzeghello (Italy), Afif Ghaith, Elie El Jbeily And Christian Fahed (Lebanon) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The UNIFIL II Mission in Lebanon: Italy’S Contribution
    Area: Seurity & Defence - ARI Nº 125/2009 Date: 4/09/2008 The UNIFIL II Mission in Lebanon: Italy’s Contribution Lucia Marta * Theme: Italy has contributed to the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) since 1979 and is the first contributor to UNIFIL II since 2006. Summary: Italy has contributed to the UN Interim Force in Lebanon since 1979, its ITALAIR being the mission’s longest-serving unit. After the fighting in July 2006 on Lebanese soil, Italy joined the leading group of European countries that promoted a new UN mission, mandate and force (UNIFIL II). Italy organised a diplomatic Conference in Rome on 26 July 2006 that helped to approve Security Council Resolution 1701 (2006) on 12 August under “Chapter VI plus”. As of 30 June 2009, Italy deploys 2,662 troops –more than France (1,444), Indonesia (1,248) and Spain (1,044)–, reflecting the importance of the UNIFIL II mission in Lebanon (Operation ‘Leonte’) for the Italian authorities. Since then, Italian troops taken an active role in its implementation and UNIFIL II was under the Command of Major General Claudio Graziano from February 2006 to February 2010. This ARI describes the mandate, activities and contribution of Italian troops in monitoring the cessation of hostilities along the border (the Blue Line), the permanent deployment of the Lebanese Armed Forces in Southern Lebanon, assistance to the Lebanese Government in securing its borders and the disarmament of armed groups in the area of operations. Analysis: The United Nations mission in Lebanon (UNIFIL) was deployed in 1978, following the Israeli intervention to create a security zone separating the two countries, and the subsequent Security Council Resolution (SCR) 425 (1978) and 426 (1978).
    [Show full text]
  • Eighteenth International Seapower Symposium: Report of the Proceedings
    U.S. Naval War College U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons International Seapower Symposium Events 10-2007 Eighteenth International Seapower Symposium: Report of the Proceedings The U.S. Naval War College Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/iss Recommended Citation Naval War College, The U.S., "Eighteenth International Seapower Symposium: Report of the Proceedings" (2007). International Seapower Symposium. 3. https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/iss/3 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Events at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Seapower Symposium by an authorized administrator of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen EIGHTEENTH INTERNATIONAL SEAPOWER SYMPOSIUM Report of the Proceedings ISS18.prn C:\Documents and Settings\john.lanzieri.ctr\Desktop\NavalWarCollege\5164_NWC_ISS-18\Ventura\ISS18.vp Friday, August 28, 2009 3:11:10 PM Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen ISS18.prn C:\Documents and Settings\john.lanzieri.ctr\Desktop\NavalWarCollege\5164_NWC_ISS-18\Ventura\ISS18.vp Friday, August 28, 2009 3:11:12 PM Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen EIGHTEENTH INTERNATIONAL SEAPOWER SYMPOSIUM Report of the Proceedings 17–19 October 2007 Edited by John B. Hattendorf Ernest J. King Professor of Maritime History Naval War College with John W. Kennedy NAVAL WAR COLLEGE NEWPORT,RHODE ISLAND
    [Show full text]
  • Peacekeeping at Sea? a Case Study of the Maritime Task Force in Lebanon1
    DOI:10.21544/1809-3191/regn.v22n2p411-440 PEACEKEEPING AT SEA? A CASE STUDY OF THE MARITIME TASK FORCE IN LEBANON1 Luiz Gustavo Aversa Franco2 ABSTRACT Since the end of the Cold War, naval forces have become more and more important to peacekeeping and conflict management efforts, a novelty whose best example is the Maritime Task Force (MTF) established within the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL). The objective of this work is to present the potentialities of the employment of naval forces in peace operations to fulfil their mandates through the case study of UNIFIL-MTF, emphasizing the role played by Brazil and how it boosts the country’s projection in international peace and security. Using the operational concepts of “maritime interdiction” and “peacekeeping”, this paper presents an overview of the utility of naval forces in peace operations in general, a brief background of the 2006 conflict in Lebanon, the performance of UNIFIL-MTF and the importance of the Task Force to the Brazilian participation in peace operations. The main contribution of this research is to fill a gap in the existing literature on the issue, which has very few updated titles dedicated to this subject. Key-words: UNIFIL-MTF; peacekeeping; maritime interdiction; Brazil. 1 The author thanks Prof. Ana Flávia Granja e Barros and Prof. Alcides Costa Vaz for their valuable contributions, exempting them of any responsibility. 2 PhD Candidate at the University of Brasília’s Graduate Studies Program in International Relations (PPGRI-UnB), Brasília, DF, Brazil and member of the International Security Studies and Research Group (GEPSI).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Mediterranean and Black Seas Hydrographic
    MEDITERRANEAN AND BLACK SEAS HYDROGRAPHIC COMMISSION Technical Visit to Lebanon 3 – 5 February 2009 REPORT Origin: France (SHOM) References : a) IHO Work Programme 2008-2012 dated May 2007, Tasks 2.2.1 and 2.3.2 b) IHB Letter CBC-WP08 dated 9 April 08 “MBSHC Technical Visits 2008” c) Letter from the Army Chief of Staff of the Republic of Lebanon dated 27 October 2008 d) Letter N°1 SHOM/DSPRE/REX/NP dated 17 February 2009 to the French Embassy in Lebanon “Technical cooperation in hydrography and cartography.” Annexes Annex 1: Terms of Reference for the visiting team Annex 2: Programme of visit to Lebanon Annex 3: Summary of meetings /discussions Annex 3 bis Résumé des entretiens ( original en langue française) Annex 4: Directorate of Geographic Affairs Annex 5: Status of hydrography in Lebanon Annex 6: Hydrographic surveys undertaken recently (chart) Annex 7: Diagram showing the national charting scheme (SHOM) Annex 8: Diagram showing the ENC scheme (SHOM) Annex 9: S-55 update INTRODUCTION 1. At the15th Meeting of the Mediterranean and Black Seas Hydrographic Commission (MBSHC), held in October 2007, it was decided to undertake technical visits to those countries (including Lebanon) where hydrographic surveying, charting and nautical information had been identified as being inadequate, and who wished to receive a team of experts mandated by the International Hydrographic Organization. 2. The IHO Capacity Building Committee (CBC) agreed at its 5th Meeting in June 2007 to finance this visit. 3. Visiting team. The Hydrographic and Oceanographic Service of the French Navy [Service hydrographique et Océanographique de la Marine (SHOM)] offered to provide experts to undertake this technical visit to Lebanon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Royal Canadian Navy in Peace Operations
    DND photo HS06-2017-0521-004 by Leading Seaman Dan Bard Leading Seaman Dan by HS06-2017-0521-004 DND photo Minister of National Defence, Harjit S. Sajjan visits the HMCS Scotian at Canadian Forces Base Halifax on 12 June 2017 to make an announcement. The Royal Canadian Navy in Peace Operations by Corey Bursey Commander C.A. Bursey, CD, BMASc, MA, has been, in of the 600 personnel are still in the planning stages by CAF his own words, “…a proud officer of the Royal Canadian Navy operational planners. Nevertheless, given that the CAF is a (RCN) since 1988.” Bursey has served operationally on several unified force made up of multiple environments – Army, Navy, HMC Ships, and on many operational deployments. Having also Air Force, and Special Forces – we ought not to assume that held numerous challenging and varied staff appointments, he is any Canadian contribution to UN PO is necessarily going to be currently the Assistant Naval Advisor of the Canadian Defence army-centric. There may very well be an impact on the other Liaison Staff in London, England. services, including the Royal Canadian Navy (RCN). Indeed, this article will describe how the RCN, or any navy for that Introduction matter, can support land and air PO, even if those forces are operating in a land-locked region. Equally, the RCN can deploy he Government of Canada, under Prime Minister independently and undertake a UN PO without it needing to Justin Trudeau, has committed to supporting be in a supporting role. The RCN can deploy rapidly, be self- international peace operations with the United sufficient if deployed with the right logistics support, remain Nations (UN) with specialized capabilities, head- outside territorial waters, and deliver multiple effects at sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 07 May
    For Free Distribution Not For Sale May 2010 - no.07 Forging Ahead UNIFIL de-miner sweeps mine-infested area in south Lebanon Editorial The Line of Withdrawal In the last issue, 'Al-Janoub' featured the Blue Line – its characteristics and challenges. Events in recent weeks underline the need for some more elaboration on the subject. What exactly is the Blue Line and what are its implications? The Blue Line is in fact the Line of Withdrawal meantime this is not under UNIFIL’s mandate. of Israeli forces from Lebanon. It is not a border. The Blue Line remains the only reference point The purpose of the Blue Line, therefore, is not to for ensuring that there is no violation by any side. define which territory belongs to which country. This is an important element of the cessation of Its sole purpose is to enable UNIFIL to verify hostilities and the related obligations that both the Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon without any the parties have taken upon themselves. This is prejudice to future border agreements between what the UN Security Council resolution 1701 has the member states. tasked UNIFIL to monitor. For this purpose, the Blue Line was identified As such, any crossing of the Blue Line constitutes by the United Nations in the year 2000 to a violation of resolution 1701. As an impartial ensure that UNIFIL had some reference point to observer, UNIFIL deals with all violations in an determine that the Israeli forces had withdrawn open, transparent and even-handed manner. from Lebanon. At that time, both Lebanon and UNIFIL’s objective reporting on developments Israel had reservations on a number of points serves as a deterrent to wanton escalation by any and locations, but both the parties confirmed to side and has contributed to the unprecedented the UN Secretary-General that they will respect calm the area has witnessed for close to four the Line of Withdrawal as identified by the United years now.
    [Show full text]
  • The UNIFIL II Mission in Lebanon: Italy's Contribution
    Area: Seurity & Defence - ARI Nº 125/2009 Date: 4/09/2008 The UNIFIL II Mission in Lebanon: Italy’s Contribution Lucia Marta * Theme: Italy has contributed to the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) since 1979 and is the first contributor to UNIFIL II since 2006. Summary: Italy has contributed to the UN Interim Force in Lebanon since 1979, its ITALAIR being the mission’s longest-serving unit. After the fighting in July 2006 on Lebanese soil, Italy joined the leading group of European countries that promoted a new UN mission, mandate and force (UNIFIL II). Italy organised a diplomatic Conference in Rome on 26 July 2006 that helped to approve Security Council Resolution 1701 (2006) on 12 August under “Chapter VI plus”. As of 30 June 2009, Italy deploys 2,662 troops –more than France (1,444), Indonesia (1,248) and Spain (1,044)–, reflecting the importance of the UNIFIL II mission in Lebanon (Operation ‘Leonte’) for the Italian authorities. Since then, Italian troops taken an active role in its implementation and UNIFIL II was under the Command of Major General Claudio Graziano from February 2006 to February 2010. This ARI describes the mandate, activities and contribution of Italian troops in monitoring the cessation of hostilities along the border (the Blue Line), the permanent deployment of the Lebanese Armed Forces in Southern Lebanon, assistance to the Lebanese Government in securing its borders and the disarmament of armed groups in the area of operations. Analysis: The United Nations mission in Lebanon (UNIFIL) was deployed in 1978, following the Israeli intervention to create a security zone separating the two countries, and the subsequent Security Council Resolution (SCR) 425 (1978) and 426 (1978).
    [Show full text]
  • Lebanese Army Mohammad Zaatari Mohammad Photo/ Securing Zeina Ezzeddine The
    For Free Distribution Not For Sale February 2018 - no.21 UNIFIL magazine Lebanese Army Mohammad Zaatari Mohammad Photo/ Securing Zeina Ezzeddine the Cover design/ South Investing in the Lebanese Photo/Mohammad Zaatari Armed Forces is investing in the stability of Lebanon. UN Secretary-General António Guterres Editorial A tribute to the Lebanese Army Message from the Head of Mission and Force Commander, Major General Michael Beary UN Photo/Pasqual G. Marcos UN Photo/Pasqual G. ‘The Lebanese Army - Securing the South’ is the working relationship. We will look back through the central theme chosen for the first edition of “Al-Janoub” eyes of the Lebanese Army on their work together with in 2018. As UNIFIL approaches 40 years in March UNIFIL peacekeepers from 40 different countries. We will this is, perhaps, an appropriate way to start the new get some insight into what the LAF deployment means year; by looking at the ongoing development of the to members of the community here in this part of south Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF). It is an opportunity to Lebanon and finally we will see how UNIFIL’s support showcase some of the crucial work that takes place to the LAF aids the Government of Lebanon and the in the Area of Operations (AO), involving UNIFIL and extension of state authority in the South, which in turn our LAF colleagues and strategic partners operating in promotes stability throughout Lebanon as a whole. close coordination with one another. Since I assumed my role of Head of Mission and Force Following the cessation of hostilities in 2006 the LAF Commander of UNIFIL I have been continually impressed deployed to the UNIFIL AO, after a 30-year absence.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Vessel Delivery and Capacity Building
    ARTICLE ITALIAN HYDROGRAPHIC INSTITUTE SUPPORTS LEBANON HYDROGRAPHIC SERVICE DEVELOPMENT Survey Vessel Delivery and Capacity Building On 20 October 2016 in Beirut, Lebanon, the Italian Ambassador, HE Massimo Marotti, presided over the donation ceremony of a boat for hydrographic surveys donated by the Italian Navy to the Lebanese Navy (Lebanese Armed Forces), represented for the occasion by the Head of Logistics Department, General Kiriejian. The boat delivery is part of a broader project, worth approximately two million euros, which sees the establishment of a Hydrographic Service within the Lebanese Navy. The event was held in the presence of the Lebanese Navy Commander Gen. Majed Alwan, the Defense attaché of the Italian Embassy in Lebanon, Gen. Pier Luigi Monteduro, a delegation from the Italian Navy Hydrographic Institute in Genoa and Lebanese military and civilian authorities (see Figure 1). Navi-Gator Survey Vessel Handing over the hydrographic launch (built in Italy by shipyard Reggiani Aluminium Boats) to the Lebanese Navy was the most significant part of an agreement between the Italian and Lebanese MoDs, aimed at supporting SHMAL and enhancing its hydrographic, oceanographic surveys, geodata management capabilities and, eventually, charting skills. Italian Navy Lieutenant Enrico Zanone and Warrant Officer Giuseppe Ghirardini (sent to Beirut by the IIM Director Captain Luigi Sinapi) carried out an accurate calibration of the Navy-Gator 27 operational systems and taught SHMAL officers and petty officers how to use them. Technicians from Norbit (manufacturers of the multi-beam echosounder) and from Lighthouse (the company that provided the hydrographic payload) assisted them (Figure 2) . Finally, the international team carried out a hydrographic survey of the port of Beirut, processed and evaluated the soundings and tidal data (see Figure 3: LT Zanone training a Lebanese operator and Figure 4 Navy Gator testing the multibeam echo sounder in the port of Beirut).
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Maritime Strategic Assessment: 2015 Annual Report
    Israeli Maritime Strategic Assessment 2015 October 2015 Israel's Maritime Strategic Assessment: 2015 Annual Report Project heads: Dr. Ehud Eiran Dr. Aviad Rubin Project editor: Dr. Tamir Magal Administrative assistant: Almog Paz The Haifa Research Center for Maritime Strategy thanks Professor Fred Tauber and Mr. Dov (Berale) Shafir for their generous support which made this report possible Israeli Maritime Strategic Assessment 2015 Table of contents 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................. 5 2. Global Trends ....................................................................................... 7 2.1. The Rise of China ........................................................................... 7 2.2. The American Response ................................................................. 9 2.3. Russian assertiveness .................................................................... 10 3. Major trends in the Eastern Mediterranean and Red Sea ................... 11 4. The Superpowers in the Mediterranean ............................................. 13 4.1. The American presence ................................................................. 13 4.2. The Chinese presence .................................................................... 14 4.3. The Russian presence .................................................................... 16 4.4. Other navies .................................................................................. 18 4.5. International task forces ...............................................................
    [Show full text]