DOCSLIB.ORG

1992 Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1992 Annual Report THE OREGON PLAN for Salmon and Watersheds Status of Oregon Coastal Stocks of Anadromous Salmonids, 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 Report Number: OPSW-ODFW-2002-3 Status of Oregon Coastal Stocks of Anadromous Salmonids, 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds Monitoring Report No. OPSW-ODFW-2002-3 September, 2002 Steven Jacobs Julie Firman Gary Susac David Stewart Jared Weybright Coastal Salmonid Inventory Project Western Oregon Research and Monitoring Program Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 28655 Highway 34 Corvallis, OR 97333 Funds supplied in part by: Sport Fish and Wildlife Restoration Program administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anadromous Fisheries Act administered by the National Marine Fisheries Service, Pacific Salmon Treaty administered by the National Marine Fisheries Service, and State of Oregon (General and Wildlife Funds). Citation: Jacobs S., J. Firman, G. Susac, D. Stewart and J. Weybright 2002. Status of Oregon coastal stocks of anadromous salmonids, 2000-2001 and 2001-2002; Monitoring Program Report Number OPSW-ODFW-2002-3, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Portland, Oregon. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................1 Fall Chinook ............................................................................................................................1 Coho ........................................................................................................................................2 Chum .......................................................................................................................................3 Steelhead.................................................................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................4 SURVEY PROGRAM DESIGN .................................................................................................4 SURVEY PROCEDURE ...........................................................................................................5 ASSESSMENT OF SURVEY CONDITIONS.............................................................................7 CHAPTER 1: FALL CHINOOK SALMON .......................................9 CURRENT MONITORING PROGRAM.....................................................................................9 ASSESSMENT UNITS............................................................................................................10 METHODS..............................................................................................................................12 Survey Design .......................................................................................................................12 Measures of Spawning Escapement ...................................................................................12 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION................................................................................................16 Assessment of Survey Conditions ......................................................................................16 Spawning Timing ..................................................................................................................16 Index of Spawner Abundance..............................................................................................18 Occurrence of Hatchery Fish in Natural Spawning Areas .................................................19 Trends in Spawner Abundance............................................................................................21 ESUs...................................................................................................................................21 GCAs ..................................................................................................................................23 ii CHAPTER 2: COHO SALMON................................................................26 CURRENT MONITORING PROGRAM...................................................................................26 ASSESSMENT UNITS............................................................................................................27 METHODS..............................................................................................................................29 Measures of Spawning Escapement ...................................................................................29 Estimates of Coho Salmon Spawner Population Abundance ...........................................31 Oregon Coastal ESU...........................................................................................................31 South Coast ESU ................................................................................................................35 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION................................................................................................36 Assessment of Survey Conditions ......................................................................................36 Spawning Timing ..................................................................................................................37 Measures of Spawner Abundance.......................................................................................39 Peak Counts and AUCs.......................................................................................................39 Trends in Spawner Abundance............................................................................................41 Spawner Distribution............................................................................................................46 Estimates of Spawner Abundance ......................................................................................50 EMAP Estimates for 2000 and 2001....................................................................................50 Relationship between Standard and Random Surveys........................................................54 Coastal Lake Basins............................................................................................................55 Oregon Coastal ESU...........................................................................................................57 Southern Oregon ESU ........................................................................................................58 Occurrence of Hatchery Fish in Natural Spawning Areas .................................................61 Observations of Fin Marks on Live and Dead Fish ..............................................................64 CHAPTER 3: CHUM SALMON................................................................67 CURRENT MONITORING PROGRAM...................................................................................67 ASSESSMENT UNITS............................................................................................................67 METHODS..............................................................................................................................68 Survey Design .......................................................................................................................68 Measures of Spawning Escapement ...................................................................................68 iii RESULTS AND DISCUSSION................................................................................................68 Assessment of Survey Conditions ......................................................................................68 Spawning Timing ..................................................................................................................69 Index of Spawning Abundance ............................................................................................69 Trends of Spawner Abundance ...........................................................................................72 Standard Surveys................................................................................................................72 Supplemental Surveys.........................................................................................................72 CHAPTER 4: STEELHEAD.........................................................................76 CURRENT MONITORING PROGRAM...................................................................................76 ASSESSMENT UNITS............................................................................................................76 STUDY OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................77 METHODS..............................................................................................................................78 Objective 1 Results (Survey Feasibility)..............................................................................78 Task 1.1 (Selection of Spawning Surveys) .........................................................................78 Task 1.2 (Survey Feasibility) ..............................................................................................78 Task 1.3 (Distinction of Redds) ..........................................................................................78 Task 1.3 (Redd Longevity and Survey Recurrence Interval)...............................................78 Task 1.4 (Spawning Timing)................................................................................................79
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Relations Between Geology and Mass Movement Features in a Part of the East Fork Coquille River Watershed, Southern Coast Range, Oregon
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Jeffrey W. Lane for the degree of Master of Science in Geology presented on May 19, 1987 Title: Relations Between Geology and Mass Movement Features in a Part of the East Fork Coquille River Watershed, Southern Coast Range, Oregon Signature redacted for privacy. Abstract Approved: Frederick J. Swanson ABSTRACT Various types of mass movement features are found in the drainage basin of the East Fork Coquille River in the southern Oregon Coast Range. The distribution and forms of mass movement features in the area are related to geologic factors and the resultant topography. The Jurassic Otter Point Formation, a melange of low-grade metamor- phic and marine sedimentary rocks, is present in scattered outcrops in the southwest portion of the study area but is not extensive. The Tertiary Roseburg Formation consists primarily of bedded siltstone and is compressed into a series of west to northwest-striking folds. The overlying Lookingglass, Flournoy, and Tyee Formations consist of rhyth- mically bedded sandstone and siltstone units with an east to northeast- erly dip of 5-15°decreasing upward in the stratigraphic section. The units form cuesta ridges with up to 2000 feet of relief. The distribution of mass movements is demonstrably related to the bedrock geology and the study area topography. Debris avalanches are more common on the steep slopes underlain by Flournoy Formation and Tyee Formation sandstones, on the obsequent slope of cuesta ridges, and on north-facing slopes. Soil creep occurs throughout the study area and may be the pri- mary mass movement form in siltstone terrane, though soil creep was not studied in detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item L
    Kate Brown, Governor 775 Summer Street NE, Suite 360 Salem OR 97301-1290 www.oregon.gov/oweb (503) 986-0178 Agenda Item L supports OWEB’s Strategic Plan priority # 6: Coordinated Monitoring and Shared Learning. MEMORANDUM TO: Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board FROM: Audrey Hatch, Conservation Outcomes Coordinator Renee Davis, Deputy Director SUBJECT: Agenda Item L – Telling the Restoration Story January 22-23, 2020 Board Meeting I. Introduction “Telling the Restoration Story” is a targeted grant offering that helps OWEB and grantees better communicate the ecological outcomes of restoration funded by OWEB. These grants support compilation, analysis, and/or interpretation of existing data from a watershed restoration project, and production of outreach materials that describe outcomes. Outreach products will reach a broad audience, including board members and legislators. Grantees also have identified specific audiences, so their messages about factors that lead to quantifiable restoration success will have high impact by speaking to landowners, restoration practitioners, and natural resource managers working to restore similar landscapes in Oregon. II. Progress to Date Seven projects were funded by OWEB in 2019: 1. Smith River Watershed Council: video, two-page fact sheet and technical report about how stream restoration treatments have increased salmon populations in the West Fork Smith River; 2. Lake County Umbrella Watershed Council: video, four-page fact sheet and technical report that highlights how fish passage projects benefit sensitive species in the Warner Lakes Basin; 3. Rogue Basin Partnership: online story map, fact sheet and compilation of fish passage restoration projects in the Rogue Basin; 4. Coos Watershed Association: video, fact sheet, and update to previously developed Willanch Creek report that details how riparian restoration improved habitat and helped keep water temperatures cool; 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Umpqua Bibliography by Groups I. Possible
    Umpqua Bibliography by Groups Introduction This bibliography is about the Umpqua River Basin, particularly its hydrology and its fisheries. Some films, photographs and archival materials are included along with books, articles, maps and web pages. The bibliography was built using local, regional and national library catalogs, major online databases, theses and dissertations, watershed assessments and Federal endangered species reports. Its historical coverage begins with Joel Palmer’s 1847 Journal of Travels over the Rocky Mountains and ends in early 2008. I have attempted to cover major physical features of the Umpqua Basin, as well as important aquatic species and critical issues facing the area. Trying to build a comprehensive collection of references on any subject in the age of information is, to use an image Joel Palmer would understand, like trying to catch a greased pig. It is ever squirming out of your grasp. This collection of references is necessarily incomplete, but I’d be grateful to learn of any major omissions. --Susan Gilmont Updated September, 2008 I. Possible Candidates for Digitization: Grey Literature, Important Or Uncataloged Reports on the Umpqua River (Sorted by Date) Roth, A. R. A survey of the waters of the South Umpqua Ranger District : Umpqua National Forest . Portland, Or.: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region; 1937. Call Number: OSU Libraries: Valley SH35.O7 U65 Notes: Baseline temperature data for the Umpqua Oregon State Game Commission. Lower Umpqua River Study : Summary : Annual Report. 1949. Call Number: Available from NMFS Environmental and Technical Svcs. Division, 525 NE Oregon St. Portland, OR 97232 (? dated reference). State Library or StreamNet should have this.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE University of Idaho
    CURRICULUM VITAE University of Idaho NAME: Madison S. Powell DATE: January 5, 2018 RANK OR TITLE: Associate Professor, Department of Animal and Veterinary Science Associate Director, Aquaculture Research Institute, Hagerman Fish Culture Experiment Station DEPARTMENT: Animal and Veterinary Science OFFICE LOCATION AND CAMPUS ZIP: OFFICE PHONE: 208-837-9096 FAX: 208-837-6047 Hagerman Fish Culture Experiment Station EMAIL: [email protected] 3059F National Fish Hatchery Road Hagerman, ID 83332 DATE OF FIRST EMPLOYMENT AT UI: June 1995 DATE OF TENURE: Tenured July 2008 DATE OF PRESENT RANK OR TITLE: July 2008 EDUCATION BEYOND HIGH SCHOOL: Degrees: Ph.D., Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, Zoology, 1995 M.S., University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, Zoology, 1990 B.S., University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, Zoology and Biology, 1985 EXPERIENCE: Teaching, Extension and Research Appointments: Associate Professor / Graduate Faculty, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Faculty, Department of Animal and Veterinary Science, Aquaculture Research Institute, Hagerman Fish Culture Experiment Station, University of Idaho, Hagerman, Idaho, 2008 – present Assistant Professor / Graduate Faculty, Department of Animal and Veterinary Science, Aquaculture Research Institute, Hagerman Fish Culture Experiment Station, University of Idaho, Hagerman, Idaho, 2002 – 2008 Research Assistant Professor, Department of Animal and Veterinary Science / Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources, Aquaculture Research Institute, Hagerman Fish Culture Experiment Station, University
    [Show full text]
  • DOGAMI Open-File Report O-16-02, Landslide Susceptibility Overview
    State of Oregon Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Brad Avy, State Geologist OPEN-FILE REPORT O-16-02 LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY OVERVIEW MAP OF OREGON By William J. Burns1, Katherine A. Mickelson1, and Ian P. Madin1 G E O L O G Y F A N O D T N M I E N M E T R R A A L P I E N D D U N S O T G R E I R E S O 1937 2016 1Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, 800 NE Oregon Street, Suite 965, Portland, Oregon 97232 Landslide Susceptibility Overview Map of Oregon NOTICE This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information. This publication cannot substitute for site-specific investigations by qualified practitioners. Site-specific data may give results that differ from the results shown in the publication. Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Open-File Report O-16-02 Published in conformance with ORS 516.030 For additional information: Administrative Offices 800 NE Oregon Street, Suite 965 Portland, OR 97232 Telephone (971) 673-1555 Fax (971) 673-1562 http://www.oregongeology.org http://www.oregon.gov/DOGAMI/ ii Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Open-File Report O-16-02 Landslide Susceptibility Overview Map of Oregon TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 REPORT SUMMARY ..............................................................................................1 2.0 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • The Coquille River Basin, Southwestern Oregon
    Preliminary Assessment of Channel Stability and Bed-Material Transport in the Coquille River Basin, Southwestern Oregon By Krista L. Jones, Jim E. O’Connor, Mackenzie K. Keith, Joseph F. Mangano, and J. Rose Wallick Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Oregon Department of State Lands Open-File Report 2012–1064 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: South Fork Coquille River in the Broadbent Reach (Photograph by Krista L. Jones, U.S. Geological Survey, July 2010.) Preliminary Assessment of Channel Stability and Bed-Material Transport in the Coquille River Basin, Southwestern Oregon By Krista L. Jones, Jim E. O’Connor, Mackenzie K. Keith, Joseph F. Mangano, and J. Rose Wallick Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Oregon Department of State Lands Open-File Report 2012–1064 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.govFor more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Jones, K.L., O’Connor, J.E., Keith, M.K., Mangano, J.F., and Wallick, J.R., 2012, Preliminary assessment of channel stability and bed-material transport in the Coquille River basin, southwestern Oregon: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Coos County Flood Insurance Study, P14216.AO, Scales 1:12,000 and 1:24,000, Portland, Oregon, September 1980
    FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY COOS COUNTY, OREGON AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER BANDON, CITY OF 410043 COOS BAY, CITY OF 410044 COOS COUNTY (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) 410042 COQUILLE, CITY OF 410045 LAKESIDE, CITY OF 410278 MYRTLE POINT, CITY OF 410047 NORTH BEND, CITY OF 410048 POWERS, CITY OF 410049 Revised: March 17, 2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 41011CV000B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Initial Countywide FIS Effective Date: September 25, 2009 Revised Countywide FIS Date: March 17, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose of Study ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • COOS and COQUILLE AREA AGRICULTURAL WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN
    COOS and COQUILLE AREA AGRICULTURAL WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Developed by the Coos and Coquille Local Advisory Committee and The Oregon Department of Agriculture with Assistance from The Coos County Soil and Water Conservation District March 29, 2006 Updated June 3, 2010 Local Advisory Committee Members Eric Aasen Jolly Hibbits Joan Mahaffy Jeff Cochran Tom Johnson JoAnn Mast Jordan Utsey (deceased) Steve Cooper Bonnie Joyce Dave Messerle Heath Hampel Roland Ransdell Coos and Coquille Area Agricultural Water Quality Management Plan June 3, 2010 Page 2 Table of Contents Acronyms........................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Foreword ............................................................................................................................................................................ 6 Applicability ...................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction........................................................................................................................................................................ 6 Agriculture in the Coos and Coquille Watersheds....................................................................................................... 8 Agriculture in the Tenmile Watershed ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • South Coast Basin Water Quality Status/Action Plan
    South Coast Basin Watershed Approach South Coast Basin Status Report Appendices Appendix A: Section 303D and 305B Information ............................................ 5 Appendix B: South Coast Basin Land Use Detail .............................................. 17 Appendix C: Water Availability and Water Rights .......................................... 23 Appendix D: General NPDES Permits by Sub-basin ........................................ 31 Appendix E: CEMAP Sampling Site Detail ........................................................... 36 Appendix F: Biomonitoring Sampling Site Detail and Condition ............... 40 Appendix G: Water Quality Data Graphics and Detail ................................... 47 Floras Creek Dissolved Oxygen and pH TMDL Intensive ...................................................52 Floras Creek Diel Fluctuations – July 2008 ........................................................................53 Sixes River Ambient Sampling ...........................................................................................54 Sixes River Spawning Dissolved Oxygen TMDL Intensive .................................................58 Sixes River Diel Fluctuations..............................................................................................59 Elk River Ambient Sampling ...............................................................................................60 Hunter Creek Dissolved Oxygen and pH TMDL Intensive – July 2008 ...............................64 Hunter Creek Diel Fluctuations – August
    [Show full text]
  • 1992 Annual Report
    Status of Oregon Coastal Stocks of Anadromous Salmonids Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds Monitoring Report No. OPSW-ODFW-2000-3 FEBRUARY 2, 2000 Steve Jacobs Julie Firman Gary Susac Eric Brown Brian Riggers Kris Tempel Coastal Salmonid Inventory Project Western Oregon Research and Monitoring Program Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 28655 Highway 34 Corvallis, OR 97333 Funds supplied in part by: Sport Fish and Wildlife Restoration Program administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anadromous Fisheries Act administered by the National Marine Fisheries Service, Pacific Salmon Treaty administered by the National Marine Fisheries Service, and State of Oregon (General and Wildlife Funds) Citation: Jacobs S., J. Firman, G. Susac, E. Brown, B. Riggers and K. Tempel 2000. Status of Oregon coastal stocks of anadromous salmonids. Monitoring Program Report Number OPSW-ODFW- 2000-3, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Portland, Oregon. CONTENTS SUMMARY................................................................................................................................. 1 Fall Chinook.............................................................................................................................. 1 Coho.......................................................................................................................................... 2 Chum......................................................................................................................................... 3 Steelhead .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Bandon City Council and Planning Commission and City Council
    JOINT BANDON CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION August 15, 2016, 6:00 to 7:00 P.M. AND CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING August 15, 2016, Following Work Session. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 555 HIGHWAY 101, BANDON WORK SESSION AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 1.1 Roll Call 2. APPROVE MINUTES 2.1 Joint Work Session Minutes from June, 27, 2016 3. WORK SESSION 3.1 Review, Discussion and Direction to Staff on Title 16 - Land Division Regulations and Title 17 - Zoning 3.2 Report on South Jetty by Commissioner Bremmer 3.3 Update on Fee Schedule 3.4 Other 4. ADJOURN AMENDED CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 1.1 Roll Call 2. EXECUTIVE SESSION 192.660 (2) (a) The governing body of a public body may hold an executive session to consider the employment of a public officer, employee, staff member or individual agent. 192.660 (2) (h) To consult with counsel concerning the legal rights and duties of a public body with regard to current litigation or litigation likely to be filed. 3. RETURN TO SPECIAL MEETING 4. ACTION Possible Action and Direction to Staff 5. ADJOURN Please note the meeting is open to the public, but no public comments will be accepted. T H E S 0 U T H J E T T Y Bandon, Oregon REPORT BAJ'IDON CITY COUNCIL BANDON PLi\1-....WNG COMMISSION WORKSESSIONS 2016 AUGUST 15, 2016 Sheryl Bremmer, Planning Commisi.ionu,Augus1 15, 2016 Southjetty Report August 15, 2016 Contents I. Introduction pg. 2 II. Historical Background pg.
    [Show full text]
  • Coos Coquille Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plan
    Coos and Coquille Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plan October 2020 Developed by the Oregon Department of Agriculture and the Coos and Coquille Local Advisory Committee with support from the Coos Soil and Water Conservation District Oregon Department of Agriculture Coos SWCD Water Quality Program 371 N. Adams St. 635 Capitol St. NE Coquille, OR 97423 Salem, OR 97301 (541) 396-6879 Phone: (503) 986-4700 Website: oda.direct/AgWQPlans Table of Contents Acronyms and Terms Used in this Document ....................................................................... i Foreword .......................................................................................................................................... iii Applicability..................................................................................................................................... iii Required Elements of Area Plans ............................................................................................ iii Plan Content ..................................................................................................................................... iv Chapter 1: Agricultural Water Quality Program ................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose of Agricultural Water Quality Program and Applicability of Area Plans 1 1.2 History of the Ag Water Quality Program ........................................................................... 1 1.3 Roles and Responsibilities .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]