DOCSLIB.ORG

Standing Conference of Towns and Municipalities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Standing Conference of Towns and Municipalities StandingStanding ConferenceConference ofof TownsTowns andand MunicipalitiesMunicipalities National Association of Towns and Municipalities Introduction to the SLAP Information System by Darko Stalevski SLAP Project Manager WhatWhat isis SLAP?SLAP? 9 Information system (web application) designed to help municipalities to input and present their project data 9 Tool for project development, and estimation of project maturity 9 Access to funds for feasibility studies and project implementation FocusFocus ofof SLAPSLAP 9 Public municipal investment exclusively 9 Investment in the three key pillars of sustainable development 9 Bottom up approach with demand driven projects coming from municipal interest 9 Value adding to central government to speed-up and optimize allocation of financial resources WhyWhy SLAPSLAP ?? 9 Need to accelerate development of public municipal infrastructure (vibrant and competitive Serbia, EU accession) 9 Need to document and prioritize projects at the local, regional and national level (scarce national financial resources, access to EU and donors grants & loans) 9 Need to coordinate resources allocation at the governmental level (balancing economic, environmental and social investment) BasicBasic PrinciplesPrinciples 9 Web enabled data entry into project pipeline by users (municipalities and regional development agencies) 9 Data evaluation by experts from SCTM 9 Support in project preparation, prioritization, and implementation 9 Web enabled access to SLAP database and custom reports about ongoing projects to Central Government and donors community KeyKey StakeholdersStakeholders 9 Ministries and National Agencies 9 European Commission 9 IFIs and Banks 9 Municipalities 9 Regional Development Agencies KeyKey ActorsActors 9 Project owners: Municipal parties inputting their project data in the SLAP database to win access to expertise and finance for implementation 9 SLAP manager: (SCTM) Orchestrator of the SLAP information system and operator of its functions to ensure continuing high value addition to users 9 SLAP users: Stakeholders of municipal infrastructure projects using SLAP to advance them toward successful implementation SLAPSLAP ScoringScoring CriteriaCriteria 9 Level 1: Scoring for Eligibility into Sectoral Project Pipeline 9 Level 2: Scoring for Project Preparation Support (finance for feasibility study) 9 Level 3: Scoring for Project Financing for Implementation (finance for construction) LevelLevel 1:1: EligibilityEligibility 9 Alignment with SLAP sectors 9 Alignment with project types in each sector 9 Eligibility of owner / proposer (Municipality, PUC, RDAs) and beneficiary (Municipality) 9 Size of project investment 9 Basic information about Project (at least a 5 page concept note) LevelLevel 2:2: FeasibilityFeasibility StudyStudy 9 Level 1 passed 9 Size of project (cost and municipal population) 9 Available project documentation 9 Core sector benefits: job creation / improved environmental service coverage / social inclusion 9 Embedding in national / regional & local strategy 9 Commitment and budgeting capacity of municipality LevelLevel 3:3: ProjectProject FinancingFinancing 9 Level 1 & Level 2 9 Economic Development Index (EDI) 9 Wider economic benefits (Economic FS) 9 Financial investment by municipality 9 Financial indicators (FNPV & FIRR) 9 Net operating margin of project 9 Project cycle ownership 9 PIU existence and setup LevelLevel 3:3: ProjectProject FinancingFinancing 9 Final Design & Tender Documentation 9 Permits and authorizations 9 Enabling institutional arrangement 9 Compliance improv. with Serbian Laws 9 Compliance improv. with EU regulations 9 Innovative Character 9 Gender and equality 9 Cross border benefits CoreCore ValuesValues 9 Quality: Accurate project data supplied by interested municipalities and validated by experts 9 Flexibility: Web enabled data entry and multiple “user- adapted” scoring, evaluating and reporting 9 Transparency: Objective scoring based on published quantitative scoring protocols ValueValue forfor CentralCentral GovernmentGovernment 9 Access to streamlined databases of scored municipal project pipelines available for financing 9 Access to intelligence about evolving projects and their maturity toward for implementation 9 Access to customized reports about projects and projects pipelines ValueValue forfor MunicipalitiesMunicipalities 9 Access to expertise for project formulation and prioritisation 9 Access to expertise for infrastructure project development and finance mobilization 9 Access to funding for project preparation and investment BenefitedBenefited FromFrom SLAP:SLAP: Vršac, Krušeac, Smederevo, Žitište, Apatin, Mionica, Varvarin, Zemun, Žitorađa, Subotica, Inđija, Užice, Pirot, Leskovac, Sremska Mitrovica, Vrbas, Šabac, Prokuplje ShortShort TermTerm ObjectivesObjectives 9 Preparation and official launch of SLAP in mid April 9 Promotion and Training among SLAP users (municipalities and RDAs) 9 Project data inputting (continuous support in project development & project maturity estimation) FutureFuture ofof SLAPSLAP 9 Establishing cooperation with other existing project databases (Eko fond, NIP(?), IZDAKON(?)) and encourage streamlined national database 9 Additional development of SLAP software to enable it to become a regional database StandingStanding conferenceconference ofof TownsTowns andand MunicipalitiesMunicipalities National Association of Towns and Municipalities www.skgo.org.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Uredba O Utvrđivanju Jedinstvene Liste Razvijenosti Regiona I Jedinica Lokalne Samouprave Za 2014
    UREDBA O UTVRĐIVANJU JEDINSTVENE LISTE RAZVIJENOSTI REGIONA I JEDINICA LOKALNE SAMOUPRAVE ZA 2014. GODINU ("Sl. glasnik RS", br. 104/2014) Član 1 Ovom uredbom utvrđuje se jedinstvena lista razvijenosti regiona, koji su prema stepenu razvijenosti razvrstani u razvijene i nedovoljno razvijene regione i jedinica lokalne samouprave, koje su razvrstane u prvu, drugu, treću i četvrtu grupu i devastirana područja na osnovu podataka organa nadležnog za poslove statistike i finansija. Član 2 Razvrstavanje regiona vrši se na osnovu vrednosti bruto-domaćeg proizvoda po glavi stanovnika u regionu u odnosu na republički prosek, za referentni period. Razvijeni regioni su regioni koji ostvaruju vrednost bruto-domaćeg proizvoda iznad vrednosti republičkog proseka, i to: 1) Beogradski region; 2) Region Vojvodine. Nedovoljno razvijeni regioni su regioni u kojima je vrednost bruto-domaćeg proizvoda ispod vrednosti republičkog proseka, i to: 1) Region Šumadije i Zapadne Srbije; 2) Region Južne i Istočne Srbije. Pored regiona iz stava 3. ovog člana, status nedovoljno razvijenog regiona ima Region Kosova i Metohije. Član 3 Prema stepenu razvijenosti jedinica lokalnih samouprava prvu grupu čini 20 jedinica lokalne samouprave čiji je stepen razvijenosti iznad republičkog proseka, i to: 1) Bačka Palanka; 2) Beograd; 3) Beočin; 4) Bor; 5) Valjevo; 6) Vrbas; 7) Vršac; 8) Kanjiža; 9) Kragujevac; 10) Lajkovac; 11) Niš; 12) Novi Sad; 13) Pančevo; 14) Pećinci; 15) Požarevac; 16) Senta; 17) Stara Pazova; 18) Subotica; 19) Užice; 20) Čačak. Prema stepenu razvijenosti
    [Show full text]
  • SERBIE G R I E (Plus De 1 100 000 Hab.) O N SZEGED H MAKÓ V
    vers BUDAPEST 20° vers BÉKÉSCSABA vers BUDAPEST vers ORADEA 22° 21° vers BUCAREST Capitale d'État SERBIE G R I E (plus de 1 100 000 hab.) O N SZEGED H MAKÓ v. BUDAPEST 19° NADLAC ARAD Plus de 200 000 hab. E PÉCS B Plus de 100 000 hab. ) SÂNNICOLAU MARE Mures U A N Kanjiza A N 46° D U Subotica Novi R LIPOVA Plus de 50 000 hab. D vers CRAIOVA ( nca Knezevac ra A 46° MOHÁCS BAČKA DU NORD K B A N A T r Coka O Plus de 25 000 hab. i B A Č K A v a a ic j Senta t a a D E L ’ O U E S T l D U N O R D Z Plus de 10 000 hab. Bačka Topola Kikinda U BELI MANASTIR Ada (SEVERNI JIMBOLIA vers VARAZDIN Sombor (SEVERNA BAČKA) Autre ville ou localité I I BANAT) I a DRA I g V I Mali Idos TIMISOARA e M E I B I V I e Crvenka ( li I k Nova D i I VOÏVODINE I Pirot Chef-lieu d'okrug (district) R k I Crnja A I a (province autonome) Apatin n Kula s I LUGOS V a I i j A I l I m ) M e i (Z A P A D N A I Becej Novi Becej l T OSIJEK I I I g a I a I I e n A Autoroute a l I I I B k i CRAIOVA B A Č K A) I I I i I I I I Vrbas I I I r I i T ta k k I S s a I I j vers I e n S g Srbobran B A I N A T a A e Route principale I CRUCENI l B Odzaci I BAČKAI DU SUD C R O A T I E GATAIA I Bîrza v a Zitiste N I s i V I u D Temerin ka Backi A Bac m Route secondaire N I C E N T R A L a DETA ( I D Petrovac U I T U B I I N Zabali Boka E I I Secanj VINKOVCI A I I I V Zrenjanin Autre route VUKOVAR I ) Novi Sad I I (SREDNJI BANAT) I I vers ZAGREB I I I I JAMU (JUŽNI BAČKA) I Backa Palanka Plandiste Futog K I MARE Titel a I Voie ferrée n I B a l I o sut Beocin D I u E I 641 vers CRAIOVA n D a
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2014
    REPUBLIC OF SERBIA PROTECTOR OF CITIZENS 22 - 3 / 15 B e l g r a d e Ref. No. 7919 Date: 14 March 2015 REGULAR ANNUAL REPORT OF THE PROTECTOR OF CITIZENS FOR 2014 Belgrade, 14 March 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS: REGULAR ANNUAL REPORT OF THE PROTECTOR OF CITIZENS FOR 2014 ............................... 1 FOREWORD, OVERALL ASSESMENT OF RESPECT FORTHE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS AND KEY INFORMATION ON THE ACTIVITIES CARRIED OUT BY THE PROTECTOR OF CITIZENS in 2014 ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 KEY STATISTICS ABOUT THE WORK OF THE PROTECTOR OF CITIZENS ......................... 21 PART I: LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND SCOPE OF WORK OF THE PROTECTOR OF CITIZENS .. 25 1.1. LEGAL FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................................ 25 1.2. COMPETENCE, SCOPE AND MANNER OF WORK ............................................................ 32 PART II: OVERVIEW BY AREAS / SECTORS ..................................................................................... 36 2.1. CHILD RIGHTS ............................................................................................................................ 36 2.2. RIGHTS OF NATIONAL MINORITIES .................................................................................... 54 2.3. GENDER EQUALITY AND RIGHTS OF LGBTI PERSONS .................................................. 70 2.4. RIGHTS OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia 2Nd Periodical Report
    Strasbourg, 23 September 2010 MIN-LANG/PR (2010) 7 EUROPEAN CHARTER FOR REGIONAL OR MINORITY LANGUAGES Second periodical report presented to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe in accordance with Article 15 of the Charter SERBIA The Republic of Serbia The European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages The Second Periodical Report Submitted to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe Pursuant to Article 15 of the Charter Belgrade, September 2010 2 C O N T E N T S 1. INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………6 2. Part I …………………………………………………………………………………12 2.1. Legislative and institutional changes after the first cycle of monitoring of the implementation of the Charter …………………………………………………….12 2.1.1. Legislative changes ……………………………………………………….12 2.1.2. The National Strategy for the Improvement of the Status of Roma ……..17 2.1.3. Judicial Reform …………………………………………………………...17 2.1.4. Establishment of the Ministry of Human and Minority Rights …………..23 2.2. Novelties expected during the next monitoring cycle of the implementation of the Charter …………………………………………………………………………….24 2.2.1. The Census ………………………………………………………………..24 2.2.2. Election of the national councils of the national minorities ……………...26 2.3. Implementation of the recommendations of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe (RecChL(2009)2) 28) …………………………………………29 2.4. Activities for the implementation of the box-recommendation of the Committee of Experts with regard to the implementation of the Charter ………………………...33 3. PART II Implementation of Article 7 of the Charter ……………………………..38 3.1. Information on the policy, legislation and practice in the implementation of Part II - Article 7 of the Charter ……………………………………………………………..38 3.1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lost Freshwater Goby Fish Fauna (Teleostei, Gobiidae) from the Early Miocene of Klinci (Serbia)
    Swiss Journal of Palaeontology (2019) 138:285–315 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13358-019-00194-4 (0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,- volV) REGULAR RESEARCH ARTICLE The lost freshwater goby fish fauna (Teleostei, Gobiidae) from the early Miocene of Klinci (Serbia) 1 2,3 4 5 Katarina Bradic´-Milinovic´ • Harald Ahnelt • Ljupko Rundic´ • Werner Schwarzhans Received: 17 January 2019 / Accepted: 15 May 2019 / Published online: 1 June 2019 Ó The Author(s) 2019 Abstract Freshwater gobies played an important role in the Miocene paleolakes of central and southeastern Europe. Much data have been gathered from isolated otoliths, but articulated skeletons are relatively rare. Here, we review a rich assemblage of articulated gobies with abundant otoliths in situ from the late early Miocene lake deposits of Klinci in the Valjevo freshwater lake of the Valjevo-Mionica Basin of Serbia. The fauna was originally described by And¯elkovic´ in 1978, who noted many different fishes, including one goby (Gobius multipinnatus H. v. Meyer 1848), and was subsequently revised by Gaudant (1998), who collapsed all previously recognized species into a single gobiid species that he described as new, namely Gobius serbiensis Gaudant 1998. Our review resulted in the recognition of three highly adaptive extinct freshwater gobiid genera with four species being divided among them: Klincigobius andjelkovicae n.gen. and n.sp., Klincigobius serbiensis (Gaudant 1998), Rhamphogobius varidens n.gen. and n.sp., and Toxopyge campylus n.gen. and n.sp. Otoliths were found in situ in all four species, which allowed for the allocation of multiple previously described otolith-based species to these extinct gobiid genera.
    [Show full text]
  • MIONICA Opština Mionica Se Nalazi Se U Centralnoj Srbiji I Spada U
    Opština Mionica se nalazi se u Centralnoj Srbiji i spada u Kolubarski okrug. Centar opštine je grad Mionica. Opština Mionica se sastoji od 36 naselja. Sve ostale informacije vezane za opštinu mozete naci na sledećoj web stranici: http://www.mionica.rs/ Municipality Mionica is located in Central Serbia, in the Kolubara District. Center of the municipality is the city Mionica. It is consist of 36 settlements. All other information regarding the municipality can be found at the following website: http://www.mionica.rs/ MIONICA Poverenik (ime i prezime) Commissaire (nom et prénom) Trustee (Name and Last Name) VESNA RADOVANOVIC Komisioneri (emri dhe mbiemri) Treuhänder (Name und Vorname) poverniko vaš tradime manuša thaj migracije (anav hem bianav) Adresa i telefon povereništva Adresse et téléphone syndic Trustee office address and telephone VOJVODE Z.MISICA 38, 014/342‐2020 LOK. 130 Adresa dhe tel. Kujdestar Adresse und Telefon des Treuhänders adresa hem telefoni Adresa i telefon opštine Adresse et numéro de téléphone de la municipalité Municipality address and telephone VOJVODE Z.MISICA 38, 014/342‐2020 Adresa dhe tel. komunes Adresse und Telefonnummer der Gemeinde adresa hem telefoni kotar kanali Adresa i telefon opštinskog fonda za zdravstveno osiguranje Adresse et numéro de téléphone de la caisse d'assurance-santé municipale Health insurance fond address and telephone VOJVODE Z.MISICA, 014/342‐1257 Adresa dhe numri telefonit të fondit të sigurimeve shëndetësort komunale Adresse und Telefonnummer des städtischen Gesundheitsfonds adresa
    [Show full text]
  • Project Fact Sheet Kolubara District Kolubara Regional Water Supply Scheme (Valjevo, Lazarevac, Ub, Mionica, Lajkovac)
    Project Fact SHEET KOLUBARA district KOlubARA REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY SCHEME (VALJevO, LAZArevAC, UB, MIONICA, LAJKOVAC) Population of Municipalities: 225.000 (2007) Main Beneficiaries: Citizens Population benefiting: 232.000 (projection 2042) PROJECT OBJECTIVES • Improve potable water supply, operational efficiency of the PUC-s, reduce health hazards, improve protection of health, and create the pre-requisites for sustainable demographic and economic develop- ment. • To integrate a series of communal water supply systems and trans- form them into a technically, financially and institutionally sustain- able regional water supply scheme. TOTAL BUDGET: € 14,825,000 • To optimize exploitation and improve sanitary protection of local water resources. EU GRANT (IPA 2010): € 8,372,000 • To comply with the relevant national and EU regulations on public (Works € 7,671,000 and TA € 701,000) water supply and related public health, environmental protection NIP (National Co-financing IPA2010): € 5,000,000 issues. Municipal budget (Loan): € 1,450,000 Main Physical Project Components: IFI Loans: € 1,000 • Raw water system Rovni - Paklje - WTP Pećina; • Treated water system in Valjevo to WT Gajina; Service revenues: € 1,000 • Transmission system - Section Valjevo-Mionica-Ub-Lazerevac; • Reconstruction and exstension of the regional WTP Other Grants: € 1,000 • Improvement of operational efficiency in local PUC-s (leakage reduction, energy efficeincy improvements). Project Maturity - Available Documentation Concept Note X; Study X; Master Plan X; Pre feasibility
    [Show full text]
  • Experience of Caritas in Providing Assistance to Flooded Households
    Issue 14 April - June 2015 PROMOTIONNewsletter OF SUSTAINABLE SOCIO-ECONOMIC TERRITORIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE WESTERN BALKANS IN THIS ISSUE: From the beginning of the last year’s floods in our country, Caritas has provided assistance to flood-affected households in the municipalities: Krupanj, Ub, Valjevo, Osecina, Lajkovac, Mionica, Sabac, Obrenovac, Lazare- Marimangat - Via Ferrata vac (Veliki Crljeni), Svilajnac, Jagodina, Paracn, Topola, Smederevska Palanka and Despotovac. Mountain Race EXPERIENCE OF CARITAS IN PROVIDING Gazivode - Mokra Gora ASSISTANCE TO FLOODED HOUSEHOLDS InTER News Author: Caritas Serbia From the very beginning of the floods that happened to our in logistics: finding hardly accessible locations, communica- country last year, a humanitarian organization Caritas Serbia tion with users and distribution of assistance. has provided various types of assistance to flood-affected households, in order to respond to their many needs: from In addition, Caritas has participated in numerous bilateral the distribution of food and hygiene items, clothes, furni- meetings with international and local organizations that ture, animal feed, dryers for use, construction materials, bri- were active in the humanitarian field in flooded areas. These quettes and firewood, stoves, household appliances, vouch- meetings were essential to co-ordinate activities and avoid ers to purchase food during the winter period, the vouchers overlap in the provision of assistance. for the purchase of furniture, laundry services, psycho-social and medical assistance. During the spring, Caritas imple- Door-to-door work mented a program to help the flooded farmers, with which they donated greenhouses, seeds, animals (sheep, goats, In order to know better the needs of households affected hens, fingerling trout), feed and equipment for work.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Submitted by the Serbian Authorities on Measures
    Committee of the Parties to the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings CP(2016)8 Report submitted by the Serbian authorities on measures taken to comply with Committee of the Parties Recommendation CP(2014)6 on the implementation of the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings Received on 19 May 2016 Ce document n’est disponible qu’en anglais. Secretariat of the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings 2 CP(2016)8 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The report of the Republic of Serbia on measures and activities undertaken in 2014 and 2015 in relation to GRETA Proposals National Strategies and Action Plans 1. GRETA invites authorities of the Republic of Serbia to include the fight against human trafficking in the next National Youth Strategy. On the session held on 27th February 2015, the Government enacted National Youth Strategy for the period 2015- 2025 („Official Gazette of RS, no. 22/15), whose implementation is in the competence of the Ministry of Youth and Sports. In the course of development process of this document, the analysis of the current state related to the youth was conducted, which showed that human trafficking is a challenge which young persons are facing, so that this challenge was identified in two strategic areas of the National Youth Strategy: safety and mobility of the youth. In the area of safety of the youth, particularly accented is
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Gender in Preparedness and Response Behaviors Towards Flood Risk in Serbia
    Supplementary material The Role of Gender in Preparedness and Response Behaviors towards Flood Risk in Serbia Vladimir M. Cvetković 1, Giulia Roder 2*, Adem Öcal 3, Paolo Tarolli 2 and Slavoljub Dragićević 4 Figure S1. Study areas location (grey). Numbers refer to the ID of the municipality. Table S1. The ID of the municipality and belonging county in Serbia. ID Municipality County ID Municipality County 1 Nova Varoš Zlatibor 96 Brus Rasina 2 Orahovac Prizren 97 Blace Toplica 3 Klina Peč 98 Aleksandrovac Rasina 4 Istok Peč 99 Trstenik Rasina 5 Suva Reka Prizren 100 Rekovac Pomoravlje 6 Glogovac Kosovo 101 Jagodina Pomoravlje 7 Srbica Kosovo-Mitrovica 102 Kruševac Rasina 8 Arilje Zlatibor 103 Ćicevac Rasina 9 Ivanjica Moravica 104 Varvarin Rasina 10 Požega Zlatibor 105 Ćuprija Pomoravlje 11 Lucani Moravica 106 Bojnik Jablanica 12 Cacak Moravica 107 Prokuplje Toplica 13 Novi Pazar Raška 108 Merošina Nivaša 14 Zubin Potok Kosovo-Mitrovica 109 Leskovac Jablanica 15 Raška Raška 110 Žitoradja Toplica 16 Zvečan Kosovo-Mitrovica 111 Doljevac Nivaša 17 Leposavić Kosovo-Mitrovica 112 Niš Nivaša 18 Kosovska Mitrovica Kosovo-Mitrovica 113 Aleksinac Nivaša 19 Kraljevo Raška 114 Ražanj Nivaša 20 Vrnjačka Banja Raška 115 Paraćin Pomoravlje 21 Knić Šumadija 116 Sokobanja Zalečar 22 Krupanj Mačva 117 Boljevac Zalečar 23 Osecina Kolumbara 118 Vranje Pčinja 24 Kosjerić Zlatibor 119 Vladičin Han Pčinja 25 Koceljeva Mačva 120 Vlasotince Jablanica 26 Valjevo Kolumbara 121 Gadzin Han Nivaša 27 Šabac Mačva 122 Niška Banja Nivaša 28 Vladimirci Mačva 123 Bela
    [Show full text]
  • Download [PDF, 164.53
    TECHNICAL REPORT FOR SERBIA LSMS 2007 Republican Statistical Office of Serbia, Department for International Development and World Bank 1.1 FIELDWORK Approximately 90% of the LSMS questionnaire was based on the 2002 and 2003 LSMS questionnaire, carrying forward core measures in order to measure trends over time. The survey incorporated two methods of interviewing - one involving the interviewer (face to face) and the other was a self-completion diary. All modules, with the exception of the consumption diary, were filled by the interviewer with the respondent. The diary was left in the household and filled in by the household member in charge of daily purchases. Fieldwork consisted of three phases. The first phase involved identification of the household and filling of certain modules, after which the household was instructed how to keep the diary of consumption. In the second phase each household kept the diary, while the interviewers were obliged to visit the household and help them in fill the diary where needed. In the third phase the interviewer visited the household again, examined the diary to see whether it had been correctly filled, and conducted the interview for the remaining modules. Distribution of modules according to phases is presented in the following table. Table 1: Organization of modules by phases of data collection 1. Demography and migration 2. Durable goods 1.phase: 3. Social programs 4. Health Household consumption 2.phase 5.1 Daily consumption 5.2 Monthly consumption 6. Education 7. Employment 3.phase 8. Agriculture 8. Water and sanitation Although the majority of questions were identical between LSMS 2002, 2003 and 2007, two new modules were added to LSMS 2007: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia Atlas
    PGDS in DOS Croatia Atlas Map Population and Geographic Data Section As of July 2005 Division of Operational Support Email : [email protected] ))) ))))))))))))) Kiskunfélegyháza))))))))))))))))) ))))))))))))))))) Harta NN ) )))))))) )))))))) ) )))))))) )))))))) ))) Völkermarkt ))) Murska Sobota ))))))))))))))))) S z e n t e s ) )))))))) )))))))) ) )))))))) )))))))) ))) Tamási ) )))))))) )))))))) ))))))))))))))))) ))))))))))))))))) ! !!!!!!!! ))) ))) Kiskörös ) )))))))))))))))) Villach Klagenfurt Pesnica Paks ))) ))))))))))))))))) MariborMariborMariborMaribor D a v o g r a d N ) )))))))))))))))) N NNNNNNNNNNNNN ) ) ) N ) ) ) N ))) N < ) )))))))) )))))))) N < <<<<<<<<<<<<< ) ) ) < ) ) ) < Marcali ) )) N < ) ) ) < ) ) ) < < ))) ! !!!!!!!! N ) )))))))) )))))))) Orosháza ! ! N NNNNNNNNNNNNN) )) ! ! N ) ) ) Orosháza s sssssssssssss! ! N N))) Szank OrosházaOrosházaOrosházaOrosháza ) )))))))) )))))))) ) )))))))))))))))) ) )))))))) )))))))) ) )))))))) )))))))) ))) Kalocsa))) ))) ))) Mursko Sredisce K e c e l ProsenjakovciProsenjakovciProsenjakovciProsenjakovci NagykanizsaNagykanizsaNagykanizsaNagykanizsa ))))))))))))))))) Kiskunmajsa ! !!!!!!!! !!!!!!!! ))))))))))))))))) ! ! ! ) )))))))) )))))))) ! ! ! ) ) ) ) )))))))) )))))))) ))) ) )))))))) )))))))) ) )))))))) )))))))) ))) Jesenice ) )))))))) )))))))) ))) ))) ) )))))))) )))))))) 2 ) )))))))) )))))))) ))) Kiskunhalas ) ) ) 2 2222222222222 ) ) ) ))) 2 ) ) ) Tolna 2 ) )) ) )))))))) )))))))) KiskunhalasKiskunhalas 2 ) ) ) ) ) ) 2 ) ) ) ) ) ) 2 ))) ) )))))))) )))))))) ) ) ) ) )))))))) )))))))) KiskunhalasKiskunhalasKiskunhalasKiskunhalas
    [Show full text]