DOCSLIB.ORG

Project Fact Sheet Kolubara District Kolubara Regional Water Supply Scheme (Valjevo, Lazarevac, Ub, Mionica, Lajkovac)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project Fact Sheet Kolubara District Kolubara Regional Water Supply Scheme (Valjevo, Lazarevac, Ub, Mionica, Lajkovac) Project Fact SHEET KOLUBARA district KOlubARA REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY SCHEME (VALJevO, LAZArevAC, UB, MIONICA, LAJKOVAC) Population of Municipalities: 225.000 (2007) Main Beneficiaries: Citizens Population benefiting: 232.000 (projection 2042) PROJECT OBJECTIVES • Improve potable water supply, operational efficiency of the PUC-s, reduce health hazards, improve protection of health, and create the pre-requisites for sustainable demographic and economic develop- ment. • To integrate a series of communal water supply systems and trans- form them into a technically, financially and institutionally sustain- able regional water supply scheme. TOTAL BUDGET: € 14,825,000 • To optimize exploitation and improve sanitary protection of local water resources. EU GRANT (IPA 2010): € 8,372,000 • To comply with the relevant national and EU regulations on public (Works € 7,671,000 and TA € 701,000) water supply and related public health, environmental protection NIP (National Co-financing IPA2010): € 5,000,000 issues. Municipal budget (Loan): € 1,450,000 Main Physical Project Components: IFI Loans: € 1,000 • Raw water system Rovni - Paklje - WTP Pećina; • Treated water system in Valjevo to WT Gajina; Service revenues: € 1,000 • Transmission system - Section Valjevo-Mionica-Ub-Lazerevac; • Reconstruction and exstension of the regional WTP Other Grants: € 1,000 • Improvement of operational efficiency in local PUC-s (leakage reduction, energy efficeincy improvements). Project Maturity - Available Documentation Concept Note X; Study X; Master Plan X; Pre feasibility Study X; Preliminary Design X; Feasibility Study X; Final Design X; Tender Documentation X; Contract Phase I –EUD under signature; Contract Phase I – NIP under Tender Embedding in documented development strategies: National Strategy X; Regional Strategy X; Local Strategy X; Urban Master Plan X SLAP PROJECT SCORING Level 2 scoring : 32,5 (out of 40) Level 3 scoring : 90,5 (out of 100) October 2012 Municipal Infrastructure Support Programme Delegation of the European Union to the Republic of Serbia Šumatovačka 3a, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia Avenija 19a, Vladimira Popovića 40/V, 11070 New Belgrade, Serbia A Project implemented by: Tel: +381 11 24 05 789 Tel: +381 11 308 32 00 Fax: +381 11 24 05 793 Fax: +381 11 308 32 01 [email protected] [email protected] www.misp-serbia.rs www.europa.rs FINANCING Project INVESTMENT VALUE – Total No Component Value € Financing by PHASE I A Project Development 1.050.000 EUD, Municipalities, GoS B1 Priority measures – improvement of PUC operational efficiency 1.450.000 EUD (IPA2010) EUD Works Contract -B2,B3 B2 Raw water system: section Rovni - Pećina EUD (IPA2010) 6.371.000 B3 Treated water system: section Valjevo - Gajina - Beloševac EUD (IPA2010) Excluded from Scope of EUD Works Contract – B4 B4 Section Divci-Mionica 1.300.000 EUD (IPA2010) Possible addendum NIP Works Contract-B5 B5 Section Beloševac - Oštrikovac 5.000.000 National co-financing IPA2010 B6 Construction supervision (EU financed elements) 450.000 IPA2010 TA C1 FOPIP 251.000 IPA2010 TA PHASE II D1 Rehabilitation of the existing WTP Pećina for capacity of 240+100l/s 3.685.000 Not identified D2 Treated water system: section Oštrikovac-Lazarevac (DN500, L=11.2km) 2.200.000 Not identified D3 Treated water system: section Oštrikovac – Ub (DN400, L=12.7km) and B Ub 2.100.000 Not identified D4 Construction supervision for phase II works 251.000 Not identified PHASE III E1 Distribution system in the municipalities 5.700.000 Not identified E2 Remote control and operation system 800.000 Not identified E3 Construction supervision for phase III works 205.000 Not identified Total 30.813.000 Project FINANCIAL Indicators FINANCIAL SOURCES / PHASE I - Components A, B AND C Indicators Values 1000 EUR Source EUR % total FNPV /C -20.825 Grant (EU/IPA2010) for works. 7.671.000 FNPV /K -9.940 Other Grants 1.000 NIP (National Co-financing IPA2010) 5.000.000 FIRR /C -0.75% Municipal Budgets/Loans 1.450.000 FIRR /K 0.46% IFI Loans 1.000 Service Revenues 1.000 Grant (EU/IPA2010) for TA (tender, construction supervision, FOPIP) 701.000 Total 14.825.000 100 October 2012 Municipal Infrastructure Support Programme Delegation of the European Union to the Republic of Serbia Šumatovačka 3a, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia Avenija 19a, Vladimira Popovića 40/V, 11070 New Belgrade, Serbia A Project implemented by: Tel: +381 11 24 05 789 Tel: +381 11 308 32 00 Fax: +381 11 24 05 793 Fax: +381 11 308 32 01 [email protected] [email protected] www.misp-serbia.rs www.europa.rs StatUS OF PERMIT(S) REQUIREMENT Indicator Not yet requested /started Requested / not approved Approved Land Title(s) x Construction Permit(s) x Environmental permit(s) x EIA x IPPC Applicable? EstablisHMENT OF PIU Indicator Yes No PIU established, fully staffed & reporting directly to municipal CEO x PIU established, staffed & reporting to lower municipal authority PIU established but not fully staffed: PIU not established Project Economic Indicators Implementation SCHEDULE GOOD Practice CHaracter Indicators Value Activities Tentative date Indicator Yes No ENPV 2.061.000 Call for tender 17.04.2012 Model role X Start of construction November 2012 Innovative dimension(s) X EIRR 17,2% Commissioning + 24 months Gender issues benefit(s) X Cross border benefit(s) X October 2012 Municipal Infrastructure Support Programme Delegation of the European Union to the Republic of Serbia Šumatovačka 3a, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia Avenija 19a, Vladimira Popovića 40/V, 11070 New Belgrade, Serbia A Project implemented by: Tel: +381 11 24 05 789 Tel: +381 11 308 32 00 Fax: +381 11 24 05 793 Fax: +381 11 308 32 01 [email protected] [email protected] www.misp-serbia.rs www.europa.rs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regional Characteristics of Market Production of Fruit and Grapes in Serbia
    REGIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MARKET PRODUCTION OF FRUIT AND GRAPES IN SERBIA Original scientific paper Economics of Agriculture 1/2018 UDC: 913:[346.54:641.13+634.8.076](497.11) doi:10.5937/ekoPolj1801201S REGIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MARKET PRODUCTION OF FRUIT AND GRAPES IN SERBIA1 Simo Stevanović2, Snežana Stevanović 3, Svjetlana Janković-Šoja4 Summary In the paper analyzes the trends in the development of market production of fruit (on the example of the apple and the plum) and grapes in Serbia from 1976 to 2015. The grouping of the Serbian districts according to the degree of the market production of fruit and grapes in 2015 was performed by a cluster analysis, on the basis of the six features of production, five features of the capacities, and five features of development. According to the data for 2015, the degree of the marketability of apples in Serbia was 47.7%, plums 15.9%, and grapes 18.3%. The Serbia-North Region shows a surplus in the production of apples, and a deficit in the production of plums (-181.7%) and grapes (-99.1%). The Serbia-South Region has a surplus in the production of the analyzed kinds of fruit (the apple accounting for 43.0%, and the plum 50.9%) and grapes (45.2%). Keywords: market production of fruit, economic development, I-distance, cluster analysis JEL: Q-13, O-11 Introduction Serbia is a traditionally significant producer of all kinds of continental fruit and grapes. Given the commercial, technological and nutritive characteristics of fruit production, 1 The paper is part of the research conducted on the “Serbia’s Rural Labor Market and Rural Economy – Income Diversification and Poverty Reduction” Project, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Uredba O Utvrđivanju Jedinstvene Liste Razvijenosti Regiona I Jedinica Lokalne Samouprave Za 2014
    UREDBA O UTVRĐIVANJU JEDINSTVENE LISTE RAZVIJENOSTI REGIONA I JEDINICA LOKALNE SAMOUPRAVE ZA 2014. GODINU ("Sl. glasnik RS", br. 104/2014) Član 1 Ovom uredbom utvrđuje se jedinstvena lista razvijenosti regiona, koji su prema stepenu razvijenosti razvrstani u razvijene i nedovoljno razvijene regione i jedinica lokalne samouprave, koje su razvrstane u prvu, drugu, treću i četvrtu grupu i devastirana područja na osnovu podataka organa nadležnog za poslove statistike i finansija. Član 2 Razvrstavanje regiona vrši se na osnovu vrednosti bruto-domaćeg proizvoda po glavi stanovnika u regionu u odnosu na republički prosek, za referentni period. Razvijeni regioni su regioni koji ostvaruju vrednost bruto-domaćeg proizvoda iznad vrednosti republičkog proseka, i to: 1) Beogradski region; 2) Region Vojvodine. Nedovoljno razvijeni regioni su regioni u kojima je vrednost bruto-domaćeg proizvoda ispod vrednosti republičkog proseka, i to: 1) Region Šumadije i Zapadne Srbije; 2) Region Južne i Istočne Srbije. Pored regiona iz stava 3. ovog člana, status nedovoljno razvijenog regiona ima Region Kosova i Metohije. Član 3 Prema stepenu razvijenosti jedinica lokalnih samouprava prvu grupu čini 20 jedinica lokalne samouprave čiji je stepen razvijenosti iznad republičkog proseka, i to: 1) Bačka Palanka; 2) Beograd; 3) Beočin; 4) Bor; 5) Valjevo; 6) Vrbas; 7) Vršac; 8) Kanjiža; 9) Kragujevac; 10) Lajkovac; 11) Niš; 12) Novi Sad; 13) Pančevo; 14) Pećinci; 15) Požarevac; 16) Senta; 17) Stara Pazova; 18) Subotica; 19) Užice; 20) Čačak. Prema stepenu razvijenosti
    [Show full text]
  • National Report of the Republic of Serbia to the Habitat Iii Conference
    NATIONAL REPORT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA TO THE HABITAT III CONFERENCE BELGRADE, SEPTEMBER 2016 0 MINISTRY OF CONSTRUCTION, TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE Minister prof. Dr. Zorana Mihajlović Department for housing and architectural policies, public utilities and energy efficiency Deputy Minister Jovanka Atanacković Working team of the Ministry: Svetlana Ristić, B.Sc. Architecture Božana Lukić, B.Sc. Architecture Tijana Zivanovic, MSc. Spatial Planning Siniša Trkulja, PhD Spatial Planning Predrag I. Kovačević, MSc. Demography Nebojša Antešević, MSc. Architecture Assistance provided by the working team of the Professional Service of the Standing Conference of Towns and Municipalities: Klara Danilović Slađana Grujić Dunja Naić Novak Gajić Aleksandar Marinković Rozeta Aleksov Miodrag Gluščević Ljubinka Kaluđerović Maja Stojanović Kerić The report was prepared for the UN Conference on Settlements Habitat III in Serbian and English language 1 CONTENT I Urban Demography ................................................................................................................... 4 1. Managing rapid urbanization ............................................................................................. 4 2. Managing rural-urban linkages .......................................................................................... 6 3. Addressing urban youth needs ........................................................................................... 7 4. Responding to the needs of the aged .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SERBIE G R I E (Plus De 1 100 000 Hab.) O N SZEGED H MAKÓ V
    vers BUDAPEST 20° vers BÉKÉSCSABA vers BUDAPEST vers ORADEA 22° 21° vers BUCAREST Capitale d'État SERBIE G R I E (plus de 1 100 000 hab.) O N SZEGED H MAKÓ v. BUDAPEST 19° NADLAC ARAD Plus de 200 000 hab. E PÉCS B Plus de 100 000 hab. ) SÂNNICOLAU MARE Mures U A N Kanjiza A N 46° D U Subotica Novi R LIPOVA Plus de 50 000 hab. D vers CRAIOVA ( nca Knezevac ra A 46° MOHÁCS BAČKA DU NORD K B A N A T r Coka O Plus de 25 000 hab. i B A Č K A v a a ic j Senta t a a D E L ’ O U E S T l D U N O R D Z Plus de 10 000 hab. Bačka Topola Kikinda U BELI MANASTIR Ada (SEVERNI JIMBOLIA vers VARAZDIN Sombor (SEVERNA BAČKA) Autre ville ou localité I I BANAT) I a DRA I g V I Mali Idos TIMISOARA e M E I B I V I e Crvenka ( li I k Nova D i I VOÏVODINE I Pirot Chef-lieu d'okrug (district) R k I Crnja A I a (province autonome) Apatin n Kula s I LUGOS V a I i j A I l I m ) M e i (Z A P A D N A I Becej Novi Becej l T OSIJEK I I I g a I a I I e n A Autoroute a l I I I B k i CRAIOVA B A Č K A) I I I i I I I I Vrbas I I I r I i T ta k k I S s a I I j vers I e n S g Srbobran B A I N A T a A e Route principale I CRUCENI l B Odzaci I BAČKAI DU SUD C R O A T I E GATAIA I Bîrza v a Zitiste N I s i V I u D Temerin ka Backi A Bac m Route secondaire N I C E N T R A L a DETA ( I D Petrovac U I T U B I I N Zabali Boka E I I Secanj VINKOVCI A I I I V Zrenjanin Autre route VUKOVAR I ) Novi Sad I I (SREDNJI BANAT) I I vers ZAGREB I I I I JAMU (JUŽNI BAČKA) I Backa Palanka Plandiste Futog K I MARE Titel a I Voie ferrée n I B a l I o sut Beocin D I u E I 641 vers CRAIOVA n D a
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected]
    Cross-border Cooperation in South East Europe: regional cooperation perspectives from the Province of Vojvodina Novi Sad, July 2013 The Autonomous Province of Vojvodina is an autonomous province in Serbia. Its capital and largest city is Novi Sad. Area: 21.5O6 km2 Sub-regions: • Backa • Banat • Srem • Vojvodina prides itself on its multi- ethnicity and multi-cultural identity with a number of mechanisms for the promotion of minorities. • There are more than 26 ethnic minorities in the province, with six languages in official use. Strengths Opportunities • Geographical position in the • Experience in project region that can be implementation through developed and IPA components I and II strengthened through construction and • A number of trained human reconstruction of roads and resources in public infrastructure administration • Natural resources in water • In process of preparation of and agriculture that can be new and updated strategic developed through IPA documents and actions components III and V plans Western Balkans 1991-2006 • Since 1991, EU has invested more than 6.8 billion euros in the Western Balkans countries through various assistance programs. • When humanitarian and bilateral assistance is added, it is more than 20 billion euros . • Community Assistance for Reconstruction, Development and Stabilization (CARDS) program had a budget of 4.6 billion euros from 2000 to 2006 with priorities: 1. reforms in the justice and home affairs 2. administrative capacity building 3. economic and social development 4. democratic stabilization 5. protection of the environment and natural resources Instrument for Pre-Assesion Assistance 2000-2006 2007-2013 *** Total budget 11.468 billion euros IPA components 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxigenic Fungal and Mycotoxin Contamination of Maize Samples from Different Districts in Serbia
    Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry 34 (2), p 239-249, 2018 ISSN 1450-9156 Publisher: Institute for Animal Husbandry, Belgrade-Zemun UDC 632.4:633.15 https://doi.org/10.2298/BAH1802239K TOXIGENIC FUNGAL AND MYCOTOXIN CONTAMINATION OF MAIZE SAMPLES FROM DIFFERENT DISTRICTS IN SERBIA Vesna Krnjaja1, Slavica Stanković2, Miloš Lukić1, Nenad Mićić1, Tanja Petrović3, Zorica Bijelić1, Violeta Mandić1 1Institute for Animal Husbandry, Autoput 16, 11080, Belgrade-Zemun, Serbia 2Maize Research Institute “Zemun Polje“, Slobodana Bajića 1, 11185, Belgrade-Zemun, Serbia 3Institute of Food Technology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Nemanjina 6, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia Corresponding author: [email protected] Original scientific paper Abstract: This study was carried out in order to investigate the natural occurrence of toxigenic fungi and levels of zearalenone (ZEA), deoxynivalenol (DON) and aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) in the maize stored immediately after harvesting in 2016 and used for animal feed in Serbia. A total of 22 maize samples were collected from four different districts across the country: City of Belgrade (nine samples), Šumadija (eight samples), Podunavlje (four samples) and Kolubara (one sample). Toxigenic fungi were identified according to the morphological characteristics whereas the mycotoxins contamination were detected using biochemistry enzyme-linked immuno-sorbent (ELISA) assay. The tested samples were mostly infected with Aspergillus, Fusarium and Penicillium spp., except that one sample originated from Kolubara was not contaminated with Aspergillus species. Fusarium graminearum was the most common species in the maize sample from Kolubara district (60%), F. verticillioides in the maize samples from Podunavlje (43.75%) and City of Belgrade (22.4%) districts, and Penicillium spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Jedinica Lokalne Samouprave Grad/Mesto Naziv Marketa Adresa Ada Ada TSV DISKONT Lenjinova 44A Ada Ada TSV Diskont Lenjinova 24 A
    Jedinica lokalne samouprave Grad/Mesto Naziv marketa Adresa Ada Ada TSV DISKONT Lenjinova 44a Ada Ada TSV Diskont Lenjinova 24 Ada Ada Univerexport SABO SEPEŠI LASLA 88 Ada Ada Trgopromet LENJINOVA 44A Ada Ada DUDI CO D.O.O. Lenjinova 15 Ada Ada DTL - AD Senta Promet TP Bakoš Kalmana 1 Ada Ada DTL - AD Senta Promet TP Žarka Zrenjanina 12 Ada Ada DTL - AD Senta Promet TP Karadjordjeva br 61 Ada Ada DTL - AD Senta Promet TP Ul. Save Kovačevića 1 Ada Ada Gomex Lenjinova 2 Ada Mol TSV Diskont Maršala Tita 75 Ada Mol DTL - AD Senta Promet TP Ul Đure Daničića 24 Ada Mol Gomex Maršala Tita 50 Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac TSV DISKONT 29. Novembra 48 Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac TR Lukić ITS Gornje Rateje BB Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac STR Popović 29. Novembar 105/2 Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac STR Popović Kruševačka BB Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac Str Mira Dobroljupci BB Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac Mesara Glidžić 29 Novembra bb Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac IM Biftek Niš 29.novembar br.86 Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac DIS 10. Avgusta bb, 37230 Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac Garevina STUR TOŠA GAREVINA Garevina Aleksinac Aleksinac PD SUPERMARKETI AS DOO KNJAZA MILOSA 40 Aleksinac Aleksinac PD SUPERMARKETI AS DOO KNJAZA MILOSA 138-144 Aleksinac Aleksinac PD SUPERMARKETI AS DOO MOMČILA POPOVIĆA 128 Aleksinac Aleksinac SL Market Knjaza Milosa 77 Aleksinac Aleksinac IM Biftek Niš Majora Tepića br.11 Aleksinac Aleksinac IM Biftek Niš Momčila Popovića br. 19 Aleksinac Aleksinac Kneza Miloša 80 Aleksinac Aleksinac Apoteka Arnika Momčila Popovića 23 Aleksinac Aleksinac
    [Show full text]
  • NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY Construction of Regional Waste Management Centre “Kalenic” Serbia August 2021
    NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY Construction of Regional Waste Management Centre “Kalenic” Serbia August 2021 Contents Abbreviation List Abbreviation Full name Contents ................................................................................................................... 1 AFD Agence Française de Développement Abbreviation List ..................................................................................................... 1 CESMP Construction Environmental and Social Management Plan 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 2 CLO Compost Like Output Company Eko-Tamnava d.o.o. Ub .................................................................. 2 E&S Environmental and Social Current waste collection practices in the Region ............................................ 2 EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and Development 2 Project description ........................................................................................... 3 EIA Environmental Impact Assessment Project alternatives .......................................................................................... 4 ESAP Environmental Social Action Plan EU European Union 3 Environmental and Social Impacts .................................................................. 5 H&S Health & Safety Environmental Impact Assessment Process .................................................... 5 HR Human Resources Project benefits ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Assessment Report
    For Active Inclusion and Rights of Roma Women in the Western Balkans (FAIR II) Project Grant Number 8285-00/2015 Project duration is 36 months, from November 1, 2015 to October 3, 2018 Baseline Assessment Report Funded by the Austrian Development Cooperation (ADC) and CARE Austria Implemented by CARE International, Balkans Developed by: Zvjezdana Batkovic, Regional Gender Program Coordinator CARE International, Balkans December 2016 Table of Contents Executive Summary..................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction and Background ................................................................................................................. 3 2. Purpose and Scope.................................................................................................................................. 4 3. Process and Methodology....................................................................................................................... 4 4. Key Findings ............................................................................................................................................ 5 General Local, National and Regional Level Socio-Economic Data .......................................................... 6 ER1: Roma women and girls are empowered to exercise their rights to education, health and to life free of violence through targeted community-level assistance. ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Production of Raspberry in Kolubara District with Export Orientation Towards Istria District Market 1
    Petroleum-Gas University of Ploiesti Vol. LXII Economic Sciences 95 - 101 BULLETIN No. 2/2010 Series Production of Raspberry in Kolubara District with 1 Export Orientation towards Istria District Market Roljević Svetlana, Potrebić Velibor, ðurić Ivan Institute of Agriculture Economics, Volgina Street 15, 11060 Belgrade, Serbia e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract The Republic of Serbia represents one of the leading countries in the production of raspberries. Significant quantities of raspberries in the country are produced in the territory of Kolubara District, thanks to the good resource basis and benefits of climate conditions. Confronted with numerous obstacles while participating in the sophisticated European market, raspberry producers from Kolubara District should establish stronger links with market restaurateurs and other entrepreneurs from Istria and thus their products could reach the consumers from all over the world during their visits to Istria in the summer months. The aim of this paper is to point out the importance of increasing the volume of mutual cooperation between district and county in order to become competitive on the European market. Key words: production of raspberries, Kolubara district, county of Istria, bilateral cooperation JEL Classification: D13, D14, L17, L66, O13, Q13, Q17 Introduction The basic development of the Kolubara District is represented by the primary agricultural production and food processing industries. Fruit growing, as a form of primary production, is characterized by a number of comparative advantages over other branches of agriculture, and raspberry growing is characterized by a number of advantages over the other branches of fruit growing.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2014
    REPUBLIC OF SERBIA PROTECTOR OF CITIZENS 22 - 3 / 15 B e l g r a d e Ref. No. 7919 Date: 14 March 2015 REGULAR ANNUAL REPORT OF THE PROTECTOR OF CITIZENS FOR 2014 Belgrade, 14 March 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS: REGULAR ANNUAL REPORT OF THE PROTECTOR OF CITIZENS FOR 2014 ............................... 1 FOREWORD, OVERALL ASSESMENT OF RESPECT FORTHE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS AND KEY INFORMATION ON THE ACTIVITIES CARRIED OUT BY THE PROTECTOR OF CITIZENS in 2014 ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 KEY STATISTICS ABOUT THE WORK OF THE PROTECTOR OF CITIZENS ......................... 21 PART I: LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND SCOPE OF WORK OF THE PROTECTOR OF CITIZENS .. 25 1.1. LEGAL FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................................ 25 1.2. COMPETENCE, SCOPE AND MANNER OF WORK ............................................................ 32 PART II: OVERVIEW BY AREAS / SECTORS ..................................................................................... 36 2.1. CHILD RIGHTS ............................................................................................................................ 36 2.2. RIGHTS OF NATIONAL MINORITIES .................................................................................... 54 2.3. GENDER EQUALITY AND RIGHTS OF LGBTI PERSONS .................................................. 70 2.4. RIGHTS OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Characteristics of Individual Housing Units in Serbia from the Aspect of Applied Building Technologies
    SPATIUM International Review UDC 728.37(497.11)"19/20" ; No. 31, July 2014, pp. 39-44-7 711.4 Review paper DOI: 10.2298/SPAT1431039J REGIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF INDIVIDUAL HOUSING UNITS IN SERBIA FROM THE ASPECT OF APPLIED BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES Milica Jovanović Popović, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Architecture, Belgrade, Serbia Bojana Stanković1, Belgrade, Serbia Milica Pajkić, Belgrade, Serbia Individual housing units in Serbia have been studied from the aspect of applied technical solutions. Analyzed data have been collected during a field research in accordance with the current administrative regional division, and they represent a basis for definition of regional typology of individual housing units. Characteristic types of objects of each region’s typology have been further analyzed. Upon these analyses regional characteristics of individual housing units regarding applied construction types, building technologies and materials have been defined and presented. Key words: individual housing units, regional characteristics, typology, building technology. economic, political and cultural aspects, one can windows, volumetric characteristics of the 1 INTRODUCTION examine the connections of architecture of the buildings, and the percentage of window surfaces The basis for the research presented in this region’s individual housing units, its applied on the facades. The survey utilized the existing paper has been defined throughout several technology, construction and materials. administrative division of Serbia into 6 regions projects conducted by the team of faculty (without Kosovo), defined as: East, West, Central, members and associates from the Faculty of RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Southeast, North Serbia and Belgrade. The in-field Architecture in Belgrade. These projects have inventory of the buildings was planned as two- The chosen methodology upon which the resulted in the establishment of the research fold.
    [Show full text]