Liability for Damage to the Marine Environment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Liability for Damage to the Marine Environment LIABILITY FOR DAMAGE TO THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT Edited by COLIN M. DE LA RUE Partner, Ince & Co., London Rapporteur, CAll Sub-Committee concenwd with Pollution Damage FOREWORD BY ALLAN PHILIP, PRESIDENT OF THE COMITÉ MARITIME INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHED UNDER THE AUSPICES OF THE COMITÉ MARITIME INTERNATIONAL LONDON NEW YORK HAMBURG HONG KONG LLOYD'S OF LONDON PRESS LTD. 1993 Lloyd's of London Press Ltd. Legal Publishing Division 27 Swinton Street, London WC1X 9NW USA AND CANADA Lloyd's of London Press Inc. Suite 308, 611 Broadway New York, NY 10012 USA GERMANY Lloyd's of London Press GmbH 59 Ehrenbergstrasse 2000 Hamburg 50, Germany SOUTH EAST ASIA Lloyd's of London Press (Far East) Ltd. Room 1101, Hollywood Centre 233 Hollywood Road Hong Kong C) Comité Maritime International First published in Great Britain, 1993 British Libraty Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 1-85044-535-4 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of Lloyd's of London Press Ltd. Text set in 10/12 Linotron 202 Plantin by Promenade Graphics, Gloucester, Glos. Printed in Great Britain by WBC Limited, Bridgend, Mid Glamorgan FOREWORD BY ALLAN PHILIP, PRESIDENT OF THE COMITE MARITIME INTERNATIONAL The principal topic for lawyers in the 90s is pollution and the environment. To maritime lawyers oil pollution since the Torrey Canyon incident and the 1969 CLC Convention has been an every day subject. To-day oil pollution is just one of many problems covered by environment law. IMO, already for a long time, has been wrestling with the problems of drafting a general HNS (hazardous and noxious substances) Convention. The Comité Maritime International has as its object the unification of mari- time law. In the CMI we came to the conclusion in 1991, not least as a result of the introduction of the Oil Pollution Act, 1990 in the United States, that environmental law should be looked at from this angle. A questionnaire was cir- culated to national assocations, members of the CMI, which is our customary working method. The replies resulted in a decision to take up the problem of damage assessment in environmental law as a subject, as it is described in the CMI discussion paper reproduced in Chapter 19 of this book. However, it was felt that in order to ensure that participants in the debate should know exactly what was the basis of the discussions, it would be useful before beginning the discussions in the CMI to take stock of the present situ- ation in national and international law with respect to pollution of the marine environment. Consequently, a seminar was arranged for the CMI in Genoa in October 1992 by its secretary-general, professor Norbert Trotz, within the framework of the celebrations in Genoa of the 500 years anniversary of the dis- covery of America by Christopher Columbus. At the seminar contributions were given by 18 of the most knowledgable people in the field, including the sec- retary-general of IMO and the director of the Oil Pollution compensation Fund. The contributions to the seminar form the principal contents of this book, ably edited for the CMI by Mr Colin de la Rue, member of the CMI Sub-Committee on Pollution Damage. The seminar was intended as a basis for and introduction to the colloquium which followed it. However, it has been thought that the contributions to the vi FOREWORD seminar together form such an important introduction to the present status of the law of the marine environment that it should be available to a broader audience. Therefore, this book. Having the proofs of the book in front of me I am in no doubt that this was a correct decision. I wish to thank the editor, Colin de la Rue, for his efforts. Copenhagen, June /993 ALLAN PHILIP PREFACE On 21-23 September 1992 a seminar was held in Genoa under the auspices of the Comité Maritime International (CMI) on the subject of Liability for Pollu- tion Damage, followed on 24-25 September by a colloquium dealing with the Legal Assessment of Damage to the Marine Environment. This book sets out the text of the 18 papers presented at the seminar, together with the discussion paper debated at the colloquium and a summary of the discussion. The background to the seminar and colloquium was the emergence in the early 1990s of a conflict between two very different legal systems for compen- sating damage caused by oil pollution from ships. The international system, represented by the Civil Liability Convention 1969 and the Fund Convention 1971, had achieved widespread acceptance, with the notable exception of the United States, the world's largest importer of oil. In order to bring compensa- tion levels up to date, and also to attract the United States into joining the inter- national regime, agreement was reached at an IMO Diplomatic Conference in 1984 on Protocols to introduce various amendments to both Conventions, including substantial increases in the limits of financial cover. Entry into force of the Protocols depended very heavily on their ratification by the United States, but despite the commitment given by the US delegation at the 1984 Conference their acceptance in the United States was delayed by internal political problems, and ultimately ruled out in the aftermath of the Exxon Valdez disaster in 1989. This led to unilateral legislation in the form of the Oil Pollution Act 1990 (OPA), with a liability framework quite different in character from that of the international system. The seminar papers describe in detail the contrasting features of these two regimes, and outline from various perspectives the practical problems resulting particularly from the more controversial features of OPA. However, they are not limited to questions of liability for civil compensation, but address also pub- lic law issues including prevention and response. They are not confined to pollu- tion from ships, but extend to pollution from offshore activities. Nor are they restricted to pollution by oil: consideration is given also to problems caused by other hazardous and noxious substances, including issues surrounding hazard- ous waste and dumping at sea. The paper debated at the colloquium was founded on the replies received to a vii viii PREFACE questionnaire which had been circulated to all the national maritime law associ- ations affiliated to the CMI. It stimulated considerable discussion as to the types of claim which ought to be recoverable as a consequence of pollution damage. The debate included contributions by many eminent maritime lawyers, some of whom had been actively involved in the work which led to the 1969 and 1971 Conven- tions, whilst others had taken part in the negotiations resulting in the 1984 Proto- cols. Contributions were also made by representatives of industry, government and others with first hand experience of working under OPA and the international regime. Those discussions left little room for doubt that the CMI will have a valu- able role to play through further work in this field over the years ahead. Rarely if ever have so many distinguished experts gathered together to deal so thoroughly with the different legal aspects of marine pollution. In these circum- stances the editor's work has been comparatively limited, but by way of post- script, mention should be made here of certain significant events occurring in the months between the Genoa Seminar and the publication of this book. Two months after the seminar, in November 1992, an IMO Diplomatic Con- ference was held in London with a view to negotiating terms enabling the 1984 Protocols to enter into force without the need for ratification by the United States. A number of speakers in Genoa looked ahead to these important dis- cussions. An obstacle lay in the fact that over 32 per cent, of the funds required for settlement of all claims paid under the Fund Convention in the period 1978-91 had been contributed by Japan, which felt that the proposed increase in available compensation would impose on its oil industry a burden which was not only very high but also unfair. In the event a compromise was struck, whereby the contributions of any one State were "capped" at a level of 27.5 per cent., but only during a transitional period until either (a) the total quantity of contribut- ing oil received by all contracting States in a calendar year had reached 750 million tonnes, or (b) five years had elapsed after the entry into force of the Pro- tocols, whichever first occurred. This compromise enabled the 1984 Protocols to be re-affirmed and re-embodied in what will henceforth be known as the 1992 Protocols. The success of the Conference may be gauged from the fact that when its Final Act was opened for signature on the last day of the meeting, 49 States signed at once. It remains to be seen how soon sufficient ratifications will accumulate for the Protocols to enter into force, but early indications suggest a reasonable prospect that they will do so in the foreseeable future, thereby increasing the available compensation to more than double the present limit of some US$83m. The succeeding six weeks saw two significant oil spills in European waters- first the Aegean Sea incident outside the port of La Coruña, Spain, in December 1992, followed a month later by the Braer casualty in the Shetland Islands, UK, in January 1993. Both cases attracted intense media attention, but initial reports of environmental catastrophe on a par with Exxon Valdez proved well wide of the mark.
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report
    DNB ASSET MANAGEMENT Annual Report 2020 Responsible Investments 2 Responsible and sustainable investment strategies have been fundamental in our work for many years and are integrated across all strategies and asset classes. As a long-term and responsible investor, the consideration for and integration of ESG risks and opportunities combined with our work with active ownership are essential. We strive to deliver excellent investment performance while at the same time contribute to a more sustainable world. FACTS DNB Asset Management DNB Asset Management (DNB AM) is part of Wealth Management (WM), a business area in the DNB Group DNB AM had 165 full-time employees across three locations in Europe at the end of 2020 DNB AM managed NOK 742 billion by year-end in fixed income, equities, hedge funds, and private equity – on behalf of institutional and retail clients The DNB Group, Norway’s largest bank, aims to promote sustainable value creation by integrating ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) aspects into all business operations Annual Report 2020 | Responsible Investments DNB Asset Management Table of contents 1. Report from the CEO 6 2. Highlights 2020 8 3. How has COVID-19 impacted the ESG space? 9 4. Our Responsible Investment Team 10 5. Our Responsible Investment Principles 11 Initiatives and Standards 13 6. Regulations and Trends 14 7. Responsible Investment Approach: Four Pillars 17 Standard Setting 17 Active Ownership 18 Exclusions 20 ESG Integration 21 Our External Resources 22 8. Engagement Strategy 23 9. Integrating the UN Sustainable Developments Goals 25 10. Long-term Focus Areas 27 Human Rights 29 Climate Change 31 Water 45 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Protection in the Petroleum Industry
    10.3 Environmental protection in the petroleum industry 10.3.1 Introduction whole, the world is witnessing an internationalization of environmental controls, as international law-making The Oil and Gas (O&G) industry, by its very nature, is on environmental matters is becoming more environmentally intrusive. Various environmental centralized, thus reducing the room for standard problems arise throughout the entire petroleum cycle, setting at the individual state level. including upstream and downstream phases, but they International regulations, primarily in the form of especially occur at the stage of O&G Exploration and various international treaties, often directly or Production (E&P) and transportation. The indirectly determine (through the process of national international petroleum industry is encountering implementation), both the content of national increasing pressure from governments and civil regulations, and the general conduct of states and the society for continued enhancement of its performance industry. At the global level, there is a large group of from the point of view of limiting its impact on the binding instruments as well as numerous soft law environment. (non-binding) type documents of relevance to the oil Posing a serious challenge to the O&G industry and gas industry. The most important of these will be are: a) demands for significant reduction of hazardous discussed in this paper, which will provide an in-depth wastes at source; b) more stringent regulation of analysis of some selected areas of international discharges and emissions from petroleum production environmental regulation of particular concern to the installations and refineries; c) stricter controls of oil E&P activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Management
    10 Waste Management Coordinating Lead Authors: Jean Bogner (USA) Lead Authors: Mohammed Abdelrafie Ahmed (Sudan), Cristobal Diaz (Cuba), Andre Faaij (The Netherlands), Qingxian Gao (China), Seiji Hashimoto (Japan), Katarina Mareckova (Slovakia), Riitta Pipatti (Finland), Tianzhu Zhang (China) Contributing Authors: Luis Diaz (USA), Peter Kjeldsen (Denmark), Suvi Monni (Finland) Review Editors: Robert Gregory (UK), R.T.M. Sutamihardja (Indonesia) This chapter should be cited as: Bogner, J., M. Abdelrafie Ahmed, C. Diaz, A. Faaij, Q. Gao, S. Hashimoto, K. Mareckova, R. Pipatti, T. Zhang, Waste Management, In Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, L.A. Meyer (eds)], Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. Waste Management Chapter 10 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................. 587 10.5 Policies and measures: waste management and climate ....................................................... 607 10.1 Introduction .................................................... 588 10.5.1 Reducing landfill CH4 emissions .......................607 10.2 Status of the waste management sector ..... 591 10.5.2 Incineration and other thermal processes for waste-to-energy ...............................................608 10.2.1 Waste generation ............................................591 10.5.3 Waste minimization, re-use and
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening the International Law Framework
    1 Chapter 1 The Nature of the Marine Environment Beyond National Jurisdiction 1.1 Introduction From a human perspective the open ocean has always been a source of great mystique and unpredictability.1 Although some intrepid humans traversed the surface of the open oceans in vessels in earlier centuries, the majority of humankind tended to regard the sea with awe and to retreat from its elemental fury.2 Human exploration of the deep sea did not begin in earnest until the mid nineteenth century3 and it is only in recent decades that marine scientific research has begun to reveal the true physical characteristics and resource potential of the open ocean and deep seabed.4 Until the latter half of the twentieth century, human use of the oceans beyond a narrow strip of sea adjacent to the land masses was largely confined to navigation, fishing, whaling5 and from the mid nineteenth century the laying of submarine cables and pipelines for communication purposes.6 With the advent of concepts such as the continental shelf and the exclusive economic zone in the latter half of the twentieth century, coastal states extended their jurisdictional reach to a wider coastal domain for specific purposes such as resource exploitation and marine scientific research.7 A combination of factors such as the depletion of inshore fish stocks and an increase in global maritime trade is now leading to greater usage of the vast maritime area beyond 1 Jonathan Raban (ed.), The Oxford Book of the Sea (1992), 1. 2 Ibid, 432-433. 3 Sylvia Earle, Sea Change: A Message of the Oceans (1995), 21.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibitor Service Manual
    WEF - RESIDUALS & BIOSOLIDS 2020 APRIL 1-2, 2020 MINNEAPOLIS CONVENTION CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA SERVICE INFORMATION BOOTH EQUIPMENT quick facts Each 10' x 10' booth will be set with 8' high Green / Black back drape, 3' high Green side dividers, and a 7" x 44" one-line identification sign. EXHIBIT HALL CARPET The exhibit area is NOT carpeted; however, the aisles will be carpeted in Tuxedo. DISCOUNT PRICE DEADLINE DATE Order early on FreemanOnline to take advantage of advance order discount rates, place your order by March 10, 2020. FREEMAN SHOW SCHEDULE EXHIBITOR MOVE-IN For more information and helpful hints on pre-show procedures and move-in, please go to Pre-Show FAQ Tuesday March 31, 2020 8:00 AM - 4:30 PM EXHIBIT HOURS Wednesday April 01, 2020 10:00 AM - 6:15 PM Thursday April 02, 2020 10:00 AM - 3:45 PM EXHIBITOR MOVE-OUT For more information and helpful hints on post-show procedures and move-out, please go to Post-Show FAQ Thursday April 02, 2020 3:45 PM - 7:00 PM We will begin returning empty containers once aisle carpet is removed. DISMANTLE AND MOVE-OUT INFORMATION All exhibitor materials must be removed from the exhibit facility by Thursday, April 02, 2020 at 7:00 PM. To ensure all exhibitor materials are removed from the exhibit facility by the Exhibitor Move-Out deadline, please have all carriers check-in by Thursday, April 02, 2020 at 6:00 PM. 01/20 (496486) Page 1 of 4 POST SHOW PAPERWORK AND LABELS Our Exhibitor Services Department will gladly prepare your outbound Material Handling Agreement and labels in advance.
    [Show full text]
  • Custom and Land-Based Pollution of the High Seas James E
    Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship 1978 Custom and Land-Based Pollution of the High Seas James E. Hickey Jr. Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation James E. Hickey Jr., Custom and Land-Based Pollution of the High Seas, 15 San Diego L. Rev. 409 (1978) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship/1212 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Custom and Land-Based Pollution of the High Seas* JAMES E. HICKEY, JR.** Until very recently, States have paid little attention to the control of pollution originatingon land which threatensthe high seas. However, in the past few years the international community has taken the first tentative steps toward an in- ternationalorder for the control of land-based high seas pol- lution. This Article examines the foundations in customary international law for these steps. In particular,it reviews evidence of State practicein analogousareas of international law, the protests of States, treaties, judicial decisions, ac- tivities of the United Nations, declarationsof international bodies and published commentary to determine whether ex- isting customary internationallaw norms are applicable to the pollution of the high seas from land-basedsources. INTRODUCTION AND DEFINITIONS The purpose of this Article is to explore existing legal sources to determine whether customary international law applies to land- based pollution of the high seas.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Protection Trends 2010-05: Vol 30 Iss 5
    2010 | Vol. 30, No. 5 May ISSN:1541-9576 Periodicals 6200 Aurora Avenue ¢ Suite 200W Des Moines, lowa 50322-2864, USA Food Protection Trends Science and N@WS from the international Association for Food Protection www.foodprotection.org Does your technology stack up in the battle against E.coli0157:H7? Developed in collaboration with the USDA Agricultural Research Service, the new DuPont Qualicon BAX System Real-Time PCR Assay for E. coli 0157:H7 accurately detects all known sub-types of this pathogen in beef, trim and produce. Using the power of real-time PCR, the BAX System can process up to 96 enriched samples in less than an hour. With advanced Scorpion probes, the new assay incorporates the latest in real-time PCR technology to deliver superior sensitivity and specificity—so you can get the reliable results you need to help keep even the biggest burgers safe. Accurate, flexible and easy to use—with an elusive enemy like E. coli 0157:H7, you can trust DuPont Qualicon to deliver science and technology that stacks up to any challenge. See the latest science from a global leader in food diagnostics. 1-800-863-6842 realtime-ecoli.com Technology rules. Results matter. Campylobacter E. coli 0157:H7 E. sakazakii DuPont Listeria L. monocytogenes Salmonella ns © Staphylococcus aureus & ?- ~% Vibrio Oe Qualicon - *, 0 %, YeastandMold °<S W © t QUIN e , and BAX are trademarks yr its affiliates. All rights reserved. The miracles of science” IAFP Exhibitor IAFP Gold Sustaining Member In collaboration with ILSI Europe, ebehhetbeiale melele STAY Worldwide the Society for Applied Microbiology and the World Health Organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated and Consolidated Review of Plastic Waste Management and Bio-Based Biodegradable Plastics: Challenges and Opportunities
    Sustainability 2020, 12, 8360 Review Integrated and Consolidated Review of Plastic Waste Management and Bio-Based Biodegradable Plastics: Challenges and Opportunities Supplementary Material–Policies Table S1. Global Frameworks, Declarations and Conventions Signed to Date to Protect the Marine Environment. Date No. of Framework/Declaration/Commitment Targets/Goal Additional Comments Signed/launched Signatories/Parties As of March 2018, there London Convention on the Prevention of Marine are 87 Contracting To control sea pollution The United States of America Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter [48] 1972 Parties to the London through marine dumping is a contracting party Convention Convention for the control dumping of harmful OSLO Dumping Convention [47] Prevention of Marine substances from ships and 1972 13 signatories Pollution by Dumping aircraft into the sea, including from Ships and Aircraft plastic International Convention for the Prevention of Marine prevention of pollution of complete ban imposed on the Pollution from Ships, 1973 (MARPOL 73/78) and its 174 Member States and 3 the marine environment 1973 disposal into the sea of all revised Annex V Associate Members. by ships from operational forms of plastics. [49,272] or accidental causes. for the prevention of Paris Convention Replaced by OSPAR 1974 13 countries marine pollution from [50,272] Convention of 1992 land-based sources Legally Binding Regional Plan on Marine Litter Management. After amendment in 1995, it Initially adopted in To reduce or eliminate Barcelona Convention (The Convention for the Protection 22 countries as became known as 1976 and amended marine pollution from sea of the Mediterranean Sea Against Pollution) [51, 272] signatories (a) “Convention for the in 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • PVC (Polyvinyl Chloride)~ FACT SHEET & Talking Points
    PVC (Polyvinyl Chloride)~ FACT SHEET & Talking Points http://archive.greenpeace.org/toxics/html/contenUpvc1.html http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/en/campaigns/toxics/go-pvc-free/ http://www.who.inUmediacentre/factsheets/fs225/en/ http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/en/campaigns/!oxics/go-pvc-free/ http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jan2011/2011-01-21-01.html What is PVC? >- The most environmentally damaging plastic. In fact, this commonplace plastic is one of the most toxic substances saturating our planet and its inhabitants >- From cradle to grave, the PVC Lifecycle (production, use and disposal) results in the release of toxic, chlorine based chemicals. P:. One of the world's largest dioxin sources ~ These toxins build up in water, air and in the food chain. ;... The results: severe health problems, including cancer, immune system damage and hormone disruption. ;... No one can escape contamination. P:. Everyone everywhere has measureable levels of chlorinated toxins in their bodies. How can we get rid of PVC? >- Since safer alternatives are available for virtually all uses of PVC, it is possible to protect human health and the environment by replacing and eventually phasing out this poison plastic. >- Policymakers at the local, state and federal level should enact and implement laws that steadily reduce impacts of PVC disposal and lead to a complete phase­ out of PVC use and waste incineration within ten years. >- A new materials policy for PVC that embraces aggressive source reduction of PVC should be adopted to steadily reduce the use of PVC over time liPage Background Information "Due to the omnipresence of dioxins, all people have background exposure and a certain level of dioxins in the body, leading to the so-called body burden.
    [Show full text]
  • Gene,.1 A••Embly Diltr
    ~,:, ; . ' UNITED NATIONI A Gene,.1 A••embly Diltr. GENBRAL • 1./44/461 18 September 1989 ORIGINALa BNGLISH Forty-fourth ses,ion Item 30 of the provisional agenda* LAW or THB SEA Protection and preservation of the marine environment Report of the Secretary-General CONTENTS Paragraphs fIQA I. INTRODUCTION •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1 - 3 4 II. THB SIGNIFICANCB or THE UNITBD NATIONS CONVINTION ON THB LAW or THE SBA TO THE PROTBCTION AND PRESERVATION or THB MARINE ENVIRONMENT •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 4 - 20 4 A. A global legal framework for the marine environment ••• 4 - 8 4 B. A mechanism fo~ accommodating ocean uses and lnterests 9 5 C. A system for sustainable development •••••••••••••••••• 10 - 13 6 D. An in8tr~ent promoting the development and transfer of marine Bcience and marine technology •••••••••••••••••• 14 7 E. h model for the evolution of international environmental law ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 15 - 20 7 * A/44/150. 89-20276 1018g (E~ I• •• L/64.1661 111l91hh Pat- 2 CONTENTS (continued) Paragr.pb. 2IRI :nr. 'tHI PROTECTION AND PRESERVATION 01' THE MARINI INVIRONMBNT mmlR THE UNITBD NATIONS CONVENTION ON THI LAW 01' THI SIA 21 - 74 8 ~. Ri.torical background ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 21 - 25 8 a. Definition of pollution of the marine environment ••••• 26 C. Obligation. of States ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 21 - 51 1. Land-based sources of pollution ••••••••••••••••••• 39 12 2. Sea·bed activities subject to national jurisdiction 40 - 41 12 3. Activities in the Area •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 42 - 44 13 4 • Dumping ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 45 13 5. Vessel-source pollution ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 46 - 54 14 6. Ice-covered areas ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 5S 16 7. Pollution from or through the atmosphere •••••••••• 56 16 8. Marine scientific research •••••••••••••••••••••••• 51 16 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Converting Municipal Waste to Energy Through the Biomass Chain, a Key Technology for Environmental Issues in (Smart) Cities
    sustainability Article Converting Municipal Waste to Energy through the Biomass Chain, a Key Technology for Environmental Issues in (Smart) Cities Catalin Vrabie Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, 012244 Bucharest, Romania; [email protected]; Tel.: +40-723689314 Abstract: Cities around the world should prioritize the management of municipal solid waste (MSW). For this to be effective, there is a strong need to buildup a complex system that involves social, economic, and environmental processes, leading to a supply chain (SC). The actors involved in dealing with MSW—from suppliers, collectors, distributors, industries, and managers—should be engaged in strategic planning. This paper focuses on alternative energy solutions and uses existing SC models of managing MSW, as well as the existing literature, to identify successful stories in cities like Bergen and Tønsberg in Norway, London in UK and Barcelona in Spain and draw a conceptual framework for city officials in Romanian municipalities (but not only) to innovate—and convert MSW in biogas to be used in delivering public services, i.e., public transportation. The article shows that when the innovation is accepted and well implemented by all actors, the benefits for the citizens and the municipality are considerably higher than by using conventional methods of collecting and depositing MSW. The proposed approach is also relevant for implementing the EU environment policy, where delays are usually observed (as the case for Romania). Citation: Vrabie, C. Converting Keywords: biogas; energy; supply chain; environment; smart cities Municipal Waste to Energy through the Biomass Chain, a Key Technology for Environmental Issues in (Smart) Cities.
    [Show full text]
  • Land-Based Marine Pollution in Arctic
    LAND-BASED MARINE POLLUTION IN ARCTIC UiT-LLM Thesis November 2014 Candidate number 8 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 1.1 Introduction …………………………………………………………… 5 1.2 Environmental protection of the Arctic – a short history………....... 8 Chapter 2 Sources and Effects of Land-Based Maritime Pollution In The Arctic……………………………………………………………….10 2.1 Persistent Organic Pollutants and other hazardous substances………15 2.1.1 International law on POPs……………………………………………. 16 2.1.2 The 1979 Convention on Long range trans boundary Air Pollution 16 2.1.3 The Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants………17 2.1.4 The 1989 Basel Convention on the Control of Trans boundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and they’re Disposal……………………17 2.1.5 International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973 as modified by the Protocol of 1978 (MARPOL)……………………..17 2.1.6 Arctic Council………………………………………………………….17 2.2 Heavy metals in the Arctic……………………………………………. 18 2.3 Physical alteration and destruction of habitats in Arctic…………..19 2.4 Radionuclides…………………………………………………………20 2.5 Petroleum hydrocarbons……………………………………………..20 2.6 Sewage and nutrients…………………………………………………21 2.7 Sediments………………………………………………………………21 2.8. Litter……………………………………………………………………22 2 Chapter 3 Legal regimes for land based sources of marine pollution in Arctic 3.1 Introduction……………………………………………………………23 3.2 Customary International Law and General Principles of Law ……23 3.2.1 The Trial Smelter Arbitration……………………………………………………24 3.2.2 The Corfu Channel Case…………………………………………………………25 3.3. The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982)………………….26 3.4 Arctic Council's Regional Programme for Action for the Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment from Land-based marine pollution….
    [Show full text]