Hydrobiologia 451: 45–53, 2001. 45 © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.

Feeding on survival-food: gelatinous as a source of food for anchovies

H. Mianzan1,2,M.Pajaro´ 2, G. Alvarez Colombo2 & A. Madirolas2 1CONICET; 2INIDEP; P.O. Box 175, 7600 Mar del Plata, Argentina E-mail: [email protected]

Key words: Engraulis anchoita, gut contents, , Iasis zonaria, acoustics, south-western Atlantic Ocean

Abstract The gelatinous , composed by members of different phyla (Cnidaria, , Tunicata), are usu- ally neglected in most studies about energy transfer in the marine trophic web, and often it is assumed that such soft-bodied fauna are trophic ‘dead ends’ in the food webs. In recent years, however, it has been shown that many fish species feed extensively on , while other species may feed on them occasionally when other food is scarce. We found that anchovies, Engraulis anchoita Hubbs & Marini, 1935, shoaled close to the Río de la Plata surface salinity front, where dense aggregations of the salp, Iasis zonaria (Pallas, 1774), were detected acoustically in May, 1994. Densities of non-gelatinous zooplankton were low at this interface, and anchovies fed on the salps. In this paper, we describe the environmental and biological conditions that led a normally planktivorous filter feeder E. anchoita to prey on gelatinous plankton.

Introduction reasons why those fish species should accept gelatin- ous organisms as food are not clearly understood, but The gelatinous zooplankton, composed by members of it is hypothesized that this happens when nothing bet- different phyla (Cnidaria, Ctenophora, Tunicata), are ter is available to fill fish stomachs. Kashkina (1986) usually neglected in most of the studies about energy described this behaviour as feeding on survival food. transfer in marine trophic webs, principally because To test this hypothesis, a multidisciplinary invest- these animals are usually damaged beyond recogni- igation that included acoustical monitoring, plankton tion when sampled with conventional plankton nets. net sampling and analysis of fish stomach contents As a consequence, their distribution and abundance was performed in order to obtain a synoptic picture. patterns are poorly known. Furthermore, even though In this paper, we describe the environmental and bio- many papers have focused on their role as consumers logical conditions that led a normally planktivorous (Alvariño, 1985; Madin & Kremer, 1995; Madin et al., filter feeder (Engraulis anchoita) to prey on gelatinous 1997; Purcell, 1997), there are relatively few reports plankton. that document the predators of gelatinous zooplankton (Purcell, 1991). These discrepancies have fostered a belief that such soft-bodied fauna are trophic ‘dead Materials and methods ends’ in marine food webs. This leads to the assump- tion that some jelly species that can reach enormous Day and night sampling was conducted on the Argen- biomass merely die, sink and decompose. tine Continental shelf (Fig. 1), with the R/V Eduardo In recent years, it has been shown that many fishes Holmberg (INIDEP) from 15th to 28th May, 1994, fo- feed on gelatinous zooplankton (Ates, 1988; Arai, cused on acoustical estimation of Engraulis anchoita 1988; Mianzan et al., 1996; Mianzan et al., 1997; Pur- biomass. Zooplankton was sampled using a CalVET cell & Arai, 2001). Although some fish species may net (200 µm), 25 cm diameter. Sixty five plankton depend heavily and be specialized to feed on gelatin- stations were performed from Río de la Plata up to the ous species, others utilize them only occasionally. The slope front (Fig. 1). The net was towed vertically from 46

Figure 1. Cruise design: CTD (conductivity-temperature-depth profiler) and plankton (CalVET net) stations (), fishing stations (Nichimo Midwater trawl) () and acoustic sampling (solid line) along parallel transects (SIMRAD EK500 echosounder operating at 38 kHz), performed during Autum, 1994 by the R/V Dr E. Holmberg (INIDEP). the bottom to the surface or from 70 m up the sur- processed to achieve a one-meter vertical resolution. face. The average volume of water filtered was 1.4 m3 Salinity data are reported with a precision of 0.05. (range 0.4–3.2 m3). Standing stocks were estimated Nineteen fishing stations (Fig. 1) were sampled by converting wet weight (ww) or number of indi- with a Nichimo midwater trawl, with an inner mesh viduals to dry weight (dw) and then to organic carbon of 10 mm at the cod end. One hundred and twenty using conversion factors (Omori, 1969; Madin et al., anchovies were sub-sampled from ten stations for 1981; Larson, 1986; Fernandez Araoz, 1994). Results analyses. Length and weight of each specimen was are expressed as mg carbon m−3. Conductivity and recorded. Gut contents were identified from preserved temperature were measured with a SeaBird 19 CTD collected specimens either macroscopically or using a at a sampling rate of 2 scans per second. Data were dissecting microscope (Wild M8). Salps were recog- 47 nized by their muscle bands and stomachs or by the range: 0–3406) and 112 cladocerans m−3 (stand- whole body of the animal. Salps were identified ac- ard deviation: 338.3; range: 0–2291). Many other cording to Esnal (1981) and Esnal & Daponte (1999). taxa were collected: chaetognaths, appendicularians, Each stomach was weighed with and without the stom- meroplankton including bivalve, decapod and poly- ach content in order to determine the weight of the chaete larvae, (Engraulis anchoita ingested prey, expressed as the difference between eggs and larvae), ctenophores (Mnemiopsis sp. L. both weights. The ‘Stomach Repletion Index’ (SRI) Agassiz, 1860), and hydromedusae (Liriope tetra- was calculated following the scale proposed by Ange- phylla (Chamisso & Eysenhardt, 1821) and Turritop- lescu (1982). This index indicates the state of satiety sis nutricola McCradyi, 1859). and clado- from 1 (an empty stomach: <0.5% of the anchovy ceran biomasses reached maxima of 3.8 and 4.4 mg weight) to 4 (full stomach: >6% of the anchovy Cm−3, respectively. These maximum values were weight). found along the surface salinity front. However, less Acoustic sampling was performed along parallel than 30% of the samples showed values higher than transects (Fig. 1). A Simrad EK500 echosounder op- 1mgCm−3. Of the rest, most of 40% showed values erating with a 38 kHz split-beam transducer was em- less than 0.1 mg C m−3. When present, salps (Iasis ployed. The processing method was echo-integration zonaria) largely dominated zooplankton biomass with (Forbes & Nakken, 1972). The averaging interval was aggregations up to 277 mg C m−3, several orders 1 nm. Echograms as well as integrated area scattering of magnitude greater than non-gelatinous zooplankton coefficient values (sa, in units of m2 nm−2), were re- biomass. Except for the stations at which salps were corded with a color printer. Nine surface-referenced abundant, the biomass of total zooplankton was very layers starting at 3 m from the transducer face, i.e. low during the survey (Fig. 3). 6.5 m below sea surface, were programmed. The echo- Stomach contents of anchovies reflected what was sounder was calibrated during the cruise, according observed in plankton samples. Fifty five percent of the to the centered sphere method with standard targets stomachs studied were empty or with very little iden- (Foote et al., 1987). Echograms were analyzed in or- tifiable food. No regurgitated material was observed. der to determine the sa fraction corresponding to the Stomach contents of the rest (45%) included a few concentrations of salps. (calanoids and harpacticoids, 22.5%), clado- cerans(2.5%), appendicularians (2%), anchovy eggs (2%) and salps (oozooids and blastozooids, 11.7%). Results Almost 90% of the stomachs analyzed showed SRI values of 1–2 (corresponding to up to 1% of the The surface salinity contour of the Río de la Plata body weight), implying very little or no food in them showed a typical autumn NNE drainage, parallel to (Fig. 4A). Salps were found in the remaining 11.7% the Uruguayan as a low salinity wedge 30–35 of the stomachs reaching the maximum SRI values nautical miles off the coastline (Fig. 2). The central found (SRI= 3) (corresponding to up to 6% of the body and southern sections of the water column were highly weight) (Fig. 4B). More than 50 specimens of salps stratified. The central section had more than 200 km of (mostly aggregated zooids: Fig. 5B) were found in estuarine surface waters. The southern one was shorter one anchovy stomach. In one single haul, 40% of the and the stratified region occupied a small portion, up to specimens analyzed showed salps in their stomachs 60 km in length. Here, vertically homogeneous waters (Fig. 5), the rest being empty. were observed at the outer sector of the section. The At the working frequency (38 kHz, widely used northern section was weakly stratified due to a Con- for fish biomass estimations) large planktonic aggreg- tinental shelf marine waters intrusion lying over the ations were detected, some of them covering areas of coast. more than 1000 square nautical miles between tran- Mesozooplankton was dominated by copepods sects. Vertical profiles of the echotraces showed dif- (Acartia tonsa Dana, 1848, Paracalanus parvus ferences along the acoustic transects, either occupying (Claus, 1863), Labidocera fluviatilis F. Dahl, 1894, most part of the water column or forming well-defined Corycaeus sp. Dana, 1849, Euterpina acutifrons scattering layers with marked diurnal migrations. Ag- (Dana, 1852)) and cladocerans (Evadne sp. Lovén, gregations of zooplankton were often close to anchovy 1836, Podon sp. Lilljeborg, 1853), with mean densit- shoals. The highest numbers of salps observed in ies of 466 copepods m−3 (standard deviation: 710.5; plankton samples, fishing mid-water trawls and stom- 48

Figure 2. Surface salinity contours in the R´ıo de la Plata area. Bold isoline denotes the surface halocline of 27. Sections show the pattern of vertical stratification.

ach contents were coincident with areas where high Discussion plankton concentrations were detected acoustically (Fig. 6). From this accordance between echograms and There are very few reports on mesozooplankton dens- sampling results, we therefore assume that the plank- ities for the study area (see Méndez et al., 1997). Bio- ton aggregations registered were primarily due to the mass estimates derived from abundance data (Fernán- salp, Iasis zonaria. dez Araoz et al., 1991; Fernández Araoz, 1994) for The horizontal distribution of Iasia zonaria ag- neighbouring areas reach values within the range of gregations closely followed the salinity contours. Ag- the present study. For the Río de la Plata salt wedge gregations occurred mainly between a salinity range regime, Mianzan et al. (2001) found up to 8000 cope- of 26–33. This pattern suggested that some I. zon- pods m−3 for the inner part of the salt wedge and aria aggregations tended to be formed at the edge or several thousands for the outer section. In the present just outside the Río de la Plata Surface Salinity Front study, salps when present dominated plankton car- (SSF). bon biomass. Salps form an oceanic group (Esnal, 49

− Figure 3. Biomass of Copepoda and Cladocera ()andsalps(). Maximum values: 8.2 and 277 mg C m 3, respectively.

1981; Esnal & Daponte, 1999), however among them, produced by these animals results from their spherical Iasis zonaria invades large areas of the Buenos Aires stomach where , copepods and other organ- Continental shelf. The ability of salps to develop isms are actively concentrated. However, in spite of large populations quickly (blooms) and their capab- their low scattering properties, salp aggregations were ility to aggregate in large numbers, are consistent registered even at the 38 kHz frequency and their scat- with the enormous biomass acoustically detected, and tering measured. Stanton et al. (1996) observed that confirmed by some of the plankton samples where the number of salps of Salpa aspera Chamisso, 1819 salps represented more than 99% of the total plankton of 2.6 cm in length, required to produce a volume scat- carbon biomass. tering of −70 dB was 110 individuals per m3, working Salps are principally composed of gelatinous tis- at the same frequency. According to our results, a sue. A low sound reflectivity is expected from their maximum density obtained from the CalVET net was high water content (>95%), being considered as a 45 individuals of Iasis zonaria per m3. Also, volume fluid-like scatterer (Stanton et al., 1994). Demer & scattering (Sv) values were as high as −53 dB. In this Hewitt (1994) considered that most of the scattering sense, the comparatively rigid structure of its tunic and 50

Figure 4. Anchovies’ stomach contents. Empty (), Salps () and non-gelatinous plankton ( ). Histograms indicate the stomach repletion index (SRI) for 2 groups of stomachs: (a) stomachs without salps, (b) stomachs with salps. This index indicates the state of satiety from I (an empty stomach: <0.5% of the anchovy weight) to IV (full stomach: >6% of the anchovy weight). larger size (3–6 cm in length) could lead to a higher These identified echo traces looked like well- sound reflectivity of I. zonaria. defined ‘scattering layers’ (Fig. 6) that probably were Under some special circumstances, only one or due to the strong vertical stratification of the area. Mi- a few species will consistently dominate the scatter- anzan & Guerrero (2000) and Mianzan et al. (2001) ing, as in this case with Iasis zonaria. The acoustic reported on salp aggregations that tended to occur near monitoring constitutes a helpful tool to assess hori- the Río de la Plata Surface Salinity Front. Physical zontal distribution patterns and relative abundance. In forces and behavior may cause this scale of patchiness this case in particular, it allowed us to link appar- (see Folt & Burns, 1999). Our observations suggest ently unconnected results, like the co-occurrence of that the salinity gradient, which represents the bound- the presence of salps in plankton samples and the ary regime of two different water masses, enhances the presence of salps in anchovy gut contents, with the vertical nutrient flux, fertilizes the frontal area (Mén- background synoptic picture given by the acoustic dez et al., 1997), and is responsible for the generation recording (Fig. 6). of the Iasis zonaria aggregations. 51

Figure 5. Specimens of Iasis zonaria found in anchovy stomachs (St.). (a) oozooids, (b) blastozooids. Scale bar = 1 cm.

Several fish species find gelatinous zooplankton an larger size prey are ingested by capture (Angelescu, acceptable source of food. Most specialized species 1981). Our results showed that under low mesozo- have developed morphological and physiological ad- oplankton density, anchovies filled their stomachs by aptations to feed on these fauna (Arai, 1988; Purcell capture of salps. The only previous references to gelat- & Arai, 2001). However, it was also shown that many inous prey in the gut contents of anchovies were the species that usually are not considered as gelatinous occasional presence of juvenile zooids of Iasis zonaria predators, do actually feed from time to time on gelat- (Angelescu, 1982) and the consumption of appendic- inous fauna (Mianzan et al., 1996, 1997; Purcell & ularians (Capitanio et al., 1997). As a possible source Arai, 2001). Salps in particular represent a signific- of error, it must be considered that some of the salps ant proportion of the diet of several mesopelagic fish present in anchovies’ guts could have been ingested (Kashkina, 1986) and also for some demersal species in the net cod end. However, the salps were found in (Mianzan et al., 1996). different digestion stages identifiable by the remaining Anchovies have not been recognized as gelatin- muscle bands and nucleus. Moreover, the blastozooids ous plankton consumers, as they typically feed on (3–5 mm in length) were too small to be retained by mesozooplankton and macrozooplankton. Filtration the net cod end mesh (10 mm). and capture mechanisms vary in accordance with the Over recent decades, man’s expanding influence relationships between size of the prey and diameter on the oceans is beginning to cause major changes of the anchovy’s mouth, as well as prey density; mi- and there is reason to think that in some regions, croscopic food (<3 mm) is ingested by filtration, and new blooms of jellyfish are occurring in response to 52

Figure 6. Horizontal (map) and vertical (sections) salp aggregations and anchovy shoals detected acoustically. Colour scale is proportional to square root transformation of sa (from 0 = white to 90 = brown). Density contours as well as vertical sections represent the sa fraction corresponding to the concentrations of salps (except as indicated as anchovy). () Salps in stomach contents; () salps in plankton samples. some of the cumulative effects of these impacts (Mills, could be commonly eaten by fish species, may also 2001). Overfishing, , introduction of increase. It is not by chance that the first report on PSP alien species and pollution were identified as major (paralytic shellfish poisons) on Engraulis anchoita sources of change. Overfishing seems to have resulted was recently published (Montoya et al., 1998) and in the increase of some medusae species (Mills, 1995; salps may have been a possible trophic link, among Mianzan & Cornelius, 1999). Increases in ‘jellyfish’ other herbivorous zooplankters, from dinoflagellates have also been the result of recent invasions of non- to anchovies. indigenous species into coastal ecosystems (see Mi- anzan & Cornelius, 1999; Purcell et al., 2001). Salp aggregations were not monitored systematically in the Acknowledgements Argentine Sea, although they would play a complex role in marine trophic webs. As an example, mortal- We are indebted to Raúl Guerrero (Argentina) for his ity of mackerel, Scomber japonicus Houttuyn, 1872, comments on oceanography, Fernando Ramírez and was recently ascribed to the ingestion of salps that Laura Machinandiarena for their help with taxonom- were feeding on a bloom (Mianzan et al., ical identifications, and Marsh Youngbluth, Mary N. 1997). Red tides blooms have increased both in time Arai and Jennifer Purcell for their critical reading and space through the Argentine coastal ecosystem (El and comments on the manuscript. This is INIDEP Busto et al., 1993) and it is possible that salps, which contribution no. 1176 53

References Madin, L. P. & P. Kremer, 1995. Determination of the filter-feeding rates of salps (Tunicata, Thaliacea). ICES J. mar. Sci. 52: 583– Alvariño, A., 1985. Predation in a plankton realm: mainly with 595. reference to fish larvae. Inv. Mar. Cicimar 2: 1–122. Madin, L. P., J. E. Purcell & C. B. Miller, 1997. Abundance and Angelescu, V., 1981. Ecología trófica de la anchoíta del Mar Ar- grazing effects of Cyclosalpa bakeri in the subarctic Pacific. Mar. gentino (Engraulidae, Engraulis anchoita). Parte I. Morfología Ecol. Prog. Ser. 157: 175–183. del sistema digestivo en relación con la alimentación. In Sa- Méndez, S., M. Gómez & G. Ferrari, 1997. Planktonic studies of linas, P. J. (ed.), Zoología Neotropical. Actas VIII Congreso the Río de la Plata and its oceanic front. In Wells, P. G. & Latinoamericano de Zoología, Mérida: 1317–1350. G. R. Daborn (eds), The Río de la Plata. An Environmental Angelescu, V., 1982. Ecología trófica de la anchoíta del Mar Argen- Overview. An ECOPLATA Project background Rep., Dalhousie tino (Engraulidae, Engraulis anchoita). Parte II. Alimentación, Univ., Halifax: 85–112. comportamiento y relaciones tróficas en el ecosistema. Series Mianzan, H. & P. F. S. Cornelius, 1999. Cubomedusae and Contribución del Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo scyphomedusae. In Boltovskoy, D. (ed.), South Atlantic Zoo- Pesquero, INIDEP, Mar del Plata. 409: 83 pp. plankton. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden: 513–559. Arai, M., 1988. Interactions of fish and pelagic coelenterates. Can. Mianzan H. & R. Guerrero, 2000. Environmental patterns and bio- J. Zool. 66: 1913–1927. mass distribution of gelatinous macrozooplankton. Three study Ates, R. M., 1988. Medusivorous fishes, a review. Zool. Med. cases in the Southwestern Atlantic. Sci. mar. 64(suppl.1): 215– Leiden 62: 29–42. 224. Capitanio, F. L., M. Pajaro & G. B. Esnal, 1997. Appendicularians Mianzan, H., N. Marí, B. Prenski & F. Sanchez, 1996. Fish preda- (Chordata, Tunicata) in the diet of anchovy (Engraulis anchoita) tion on neritic ctenophores from the Argentine continental shelf: in the Argentine Sea. Sci. mar. 61: 9–15. a neglected food resource? Fish. Res. 27: 69–79. Demer, D. & R. Hewitt, 1994. In situ target strength measure- Mianzan, H., M. Pájaro, L. Machinandiarena & F. Cremonte, 1997. ments of Antarctic zooplankton (Euphausia superba and Salpa Salps: possible vectors of toxic dinoflagellates? Fish. Res. 29: thompsoni) at 120 Khz and 200 Khz, corroboration of scatter- 193–197. ing models, and a statistical technique for delineating species. Mianzan, H., C. Lasta, M. Acha, R. Guerrero, G. Macchi & C. CCAMLR WG-Krill 4: 22 pp. Bremec, 2001. The Río de la Plata estuary, Argentina-Uruguay. El Busto, C., J. I. Carreto, H. Benavides, H. Sancho, D. Cucchi In Seeliger, U., L. D de Lacerda & B. Kjerve (eds), Ecolo- Coleoni, M. Carignan & A. Fernandez, 1993. Paralytic shelfish gical Studies 44: Coastal Marine Ecosystems of Latin América, toxicity in the Argentine Sea, 1990: an extraordinary year. In Springer-Verlag 13: 185–204. Smayda, T. J. & Y. Shimizu (eds), Toxic Blooms Mills, C. E., 1995. Medusae, siphonophores and ctenophores as in the Sea. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam: 229–233. planktivorous predators in changing global ecosystems. ICES J. Esnal, G. B., 1981. Thaliacea: Salpidae. In Boltovskoy, D. (ed.), mar. Sci. 52: 575–581. Atlas del Zooplancton del Atlantico Sudoccidental. Publ. Esp. Mills, C. E., 2001. Jellyfish blooms: are populations increasing Inidep: 793–808. globally in response to changing ocean conditions? Hydrobio- Esnal, G. B. & M. C. Daponte, 1999. Salpida. In Boltovskoy, D. logia 451 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 155): 55–68. (ed.), South Atlantic Zooplankton. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden: Montoya, N., M. I. Reyero, R. Akselman, J. M. Franco & J. I. 1423–1444. Carreto, 1998. Paralytic shelfish toxins in the anchovy Engraulis Fernandez Araoz, N., 1994. Estudios sobre la biomasa de Copepoda anchoita from the Argentinian coast. In Reguera, B., J. Blanco, (Crustacea), con especial énfasis en , del Atlántico M. L. Fernández & T. Wyatt (eds), Harmful Algae. Xunta de Sudoccidental. Parte I y II. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Nac. Mar del Galicia and COI (UNESCO): 72–73. Plata: 76 + 111 pp. Omori, M., 1969. Weight and chemical composition of some im- Fernandez Araoz, N., G. M. Perez Seijas, M. D. Viñas & R. Reta, portant oceanic zooplankton in the North Pacific Ocean. Mar. 1991. Asociaciones zooplanctónicas de la zona común de pesca Biol. 3: 4–10. Argentino-uruguaya en relación con parámetros ambientales, Purcell, J. E., 1991. A review of cnidarians and ctenophores feed- primavera 1986. Frente Maritimo 8: 85–99. ing on competitors in the plankton. Hydrobiologia 216/217: Folt, C. L. & C. W. Burns, 1999. Biological drivers of zooplankton 335–342. patchiness. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 300–305. Purcell, J. E., 1997. Pelagic cnidarians and ctenophores as predators: Foote, K. G., H. P. Knudsen, G. Vestnes, D. N. Maclennon & selective predation, feeding rates and effects on prey populations. E. J. Simmonds, 1987. Calibration of acoustic instruments for Ann. Inst. Oceanogr., Paris 73: 125–137. fish density estimation: a practical guide. ICES Cooperative Res. Purcell, J. E. & M. N. Arai, 2001. Interactions of pelagic cnidarians Rep. 144: 69 pp. and ctenophores with fish: a review. Hydrobiologia 451 (Dev. Forbes, S. T. & O. Nakken, 1972. Manual of Methods for Fisheries Hydrobiol. 155): 27–44. Resources Surveys and Appraisal. Part 2. The Use of Acoustic Purcell, J. E., T. A. Shiganova, M. B. Decker & E. D. Houde, 2001. Instruments for Fish Detection and Abundance Estimation. Food The ctenophore Mnemiopsis in native and exotic habitats: U. S. and Agricultural Organization, Manual in Fisheries Science 5: estuaries versus the Black Sea basin. Hydrobiologia 451 (Dev. 138 pp. Hydrobiol. 155): 145–176. Kashkina, A. A., 1986. Feeding of fishes on salps (Tunicata, Stanton, T. K., D. Chu & P. H. Wiebe, 1996. Acoustic scattering Thaliacea). J. Ichthyol. 26: 57–64. characteristics of several zooplankton groups. ICES J. mar. Sci. Larson, R. J., 1986. Water content, organic content and carbon and 53: 289–295. nitrogen composition of medusae from the northeast Pacific. J. Stanton, T. K., P. H. Wiebe, D. Chu, M. C. Benfield, L. Scanlon, exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 99: 107–120. L. Martin & R. L. Eastwood, 1994. On acoustic estimates of Madin, L. P., C. M. Cetta & V. L. McAllister, 1981. Elemental and zooplankton biomass. ICES J. mar. Sci. 51: 505–512. biochemical composition of salps (Tunicata, Thaliacea). Mar. Biol. 63: 217–226.