DOCSLIB.ORG

Mounds in the Rania Plain and Excavations; at Tell Basmusian (1956)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mounds in the Rania Plain and Excavations; at Tell Basmusian (1956) Mounds In The Rania Plain And Excavations; At Tell Basmusian (1956) I. Introduction: The present writer was The ancient sites in the Rania plain, or responsible for the first of the three Dasht-i-Bitwain, were first investigated seasons of excavation at Basmusian, and officially by Sd. Sabri Shukri in this is now described briefly below. 1950, as part of the normal survey work In the years that have elapsed since our of the Directorate General of Antiquities. work in the Rania plain, some essential In September, 1955, a more detailed plans and records have been mislaid to study of the area due to be flooded by continue the search for them might delay the new Dokan Dam was made by a publication indefinitely. This article has team consisting of Sd. Muhammad Ali been written, with regret and many Mustafa, Sd. Mudhaffar Sheikh Qadir, reservations, in the belief that and the present writer. Some notes on scholarship is better served by limited this survey have been published information than by none at all. 1 already ; further details are included here. II. Mounds in the Rania Plain (pls. I The five mounds dug on our and V-VI): recommendation were Kamarian, ed- The original descriptions of these sites Dem, Shemshara, Qarashina, and are provided. The dating was based on Basmusian. Sd. Abdul Qadir Al-Tekriti collections of surface sherds, and it is 2 has produced a report on Tell ed-Dem, clear, in the light of further experience, and there have been several on that more precise criteria would have 3 Shemshara, in addition to an account of added to the value of the survey. It may 4 the Uruk pottery from all five sites. be noted that, among the terms used, Akkadian, Hurrian, and Median are likely to indicate a fairly wide range of, (1) Dr. Naji al-Asil, Sumer, 12 (1956). pp. 6-7. respectively late third millennium, early (2) Abdul Qadir 1'\1- Tikl'iti, M.A., Sumer, 16 or middle second millennium, and post- (1960), pp. 93-109 (in Arabic). Assyrian material. (3) Harold Ingholt, Sumer, 13 (1957) 1. Kirdi Bur:Two mounds, 400 m. pp. 214-215; J, Laessoee, ibid. pp. 216-218. apart, on either side of a seasonal -------, Sumer, 15 (1959), pp. 15-18. stream, the northern is roughly --------, Sumer, 16 (1960), pp. 12-19. --------, The Shemshara Tablets. A preliminary circular, some 500 m. in report (Arkaeologisk-Kunst historiske circumference and 3 m. high, and Meddelser udgivet of Det Kongelige Danske the southern, which lies on a Videnskabernes Selskab, Bind 4, nr. 3) natural hillock, is some 100 m. Copenhagen, 1959. across and 4 m. high. Pre-Uruk Peder Mortensen, Sumer, 18 (1962), pp. 76-80. (?), Uruk, Hurrian, late Assyrian. -------, Sumer, 20 (1964), pp. 28-36 2. Mullah Umar: Large circular mound on the western bank of (4) Abu AI-Soof, Sumer, 20 (1964), pp. the Zab; some 200 m. in 37-42. circumference, and 15 m. across at its top, where stone and juss at its base and 15 m. high. foundations are visible. Hurrian, Prehistoric, Hurrian, Assyrian, Late Assyrian, Median, Parthian. Median. 3. Kamarian: Conical mound, some 12. Babu Gawran (i.e. father and 70 m. in diameter and 12 m. son): Two mounds 300 m. apart high. Pre-Halaf (?), Ubaid, Uruk, the larger is some 200 m. at its Akkadian, Hurrian, Middle base and 8 m. high. Both are Assyrian, Median. Prehistoric, Assyrian, Median. 4. Butan: Large eleongated mound, beside the eastern bank of the 13. Mamand: Large mound some Zab; some 150 m. long, 70 m. 150 m. across at base and 5 m. wide, and 6-7 m. high. Pre-Halaf, high. Prehistoric, Assyrian, Halaf, painted Hurrian, Assyrian, Median. Median. 14. Tepe Gawran: Two mounds, the 5. Ed-Dem: Hemispherical mound, lower is some 150 m. long and some 70 m. in diameter and 12 50 m. wide, the other is 250 m. m. high. Many large pebbles on long and 3 m. high. The former the surface. Ubaid, Uruk, shows traces on its summit of an Akkadian, Assyrian, Hurrian, Assyrian building with baked Median. bricks. Both are Late Assyrian, 6. Kullah: Ovoid mound on eastern Median, Sassanian, and Islamic. terrace of Zab; some 100 m. long 15. Shemshara: - Conical mound, at its base, 70 m. across on its top some 50 m. across at its base, 20 and 20 m. high. Assyrian, m. across on top, and nearly 25 Hurrian, Median, Parthian and m. high (50 m. above the Zab). early Islamic. Prehistoric, Assyrian, Median, 7. Tankija: Mound on hill; some Islamic. 150 m. long, 100 m. wide, 3 m. 16. Kullak: Hemispherical mound, high. Prehistoric, Assyrian, 100 m. across at its base and 8 m. Median. high. Prehistoric, Assyrian, 8. Kullah Kawi: Elongated (west- Median, Islamic. east) mound in the Si-Najian 17. Parah Post: Two small mounds, valley; some 200 m. long, 70 m. altogether 200 m. long, 70 m. wide and 7 m. high. Ubaid, Uruk, wide, and 2-3 m. high. Assyrian, Hurrian, Median. Prehistoric, Late Assyrian, 9. Qara Qaj: Large low mound Sassanian, Median. south of Kullah Kawi; some 250 18. Basmusian: See below; the m. long and 100 m. wide. Late surface sherds were described as Assyrian, Median, local wares. prehistoric, Assyrian, Hurrian, 10. Mullah Shell: Two mounds on a Median, Sassanian, and Islamic. high cliff, overlooking Zab on its 19. Qarashina: Some 70 m. across at eastern bank; the northern mound its base and 20 m. high. is some 150 m. across and the Prehistoric (especially Uruk), southern 200 m. Prehistoric, Assyrian, Median. Assyrian, Median. 20-27. No details available. 11. Haiz: Large mound, some 150 m. 28. Serkhomah: Large mound in Baslan valley, some 200 m. m. high Ubaid, Uruk, Assyrian, across at its base, 100 m. across Median. on top, and 20 m. high. 40. Qabr es-Sahabah: Mound near Prehistoric Assyrian. Merzah Rustam. Prehistoric, 29. Buskain: Large mound, some Assyrian, Median. 200 m. at its base and 15 m. high. Prehistoric, Halaf, Ubaid, Uruk, III. Basmusian: Assyrian, Median. 30. Kullan: Large mound some 150 Tell Basmusian, the 1argest site m. long, 100 m. wide, and 10 m. in the Rania plain, lies about 12 km. high. Samarra, Halaf, Ubaid, south of Rania. It covers an area some Late Assyrian, Median. 1500 m. in circumference, and is 23 m. 31. Kamam: Large hemispherical high; there is a projection on its north- mound on hill; some 250 m. long western side (Pl. II). The river Zab is at its base, and 15 m. high. 800 m. due east. Prehistoric, Assyrian, Median, A village, half a century old, and Sassanian, early Islamic. consisting of some forty houses, 32. Kundu: Hemispherical mound occupied part of the south-eastern flank some 300 m. in circumference of the mound (Pl. IV, 1), It may be of and 12 m. high. Hassuna, interest to note that the houses, all of Samarra, Ubaid, Assyrian, which had stone footings to their walls, Hurrian, Median. were usually built of tof, with mud-brick 33. Qurralla (north): Ovoid mound and juss plaster in the finest dwellings, some 200 m. long, 50 m. wide, They were roofed with earth, which and 10 m. high. Ubaid, Uruk, rested on beams and small branches of Assyrian, Median. wood. Some were two-storeyed with 34. Qurralla (south): Large ovoid livestock sometimes on the lower mound, some 250 m. long, 100 floor, though most animals were m. wide, and 20 m. high. Ubaid, norrnal1y kept in the courtyards. The Uruk, Late Assyrian, Median. main crops, irrigated from perennial 35. Mahmud Habbas: Large mound stream were cotton and tobacco; some some 200 m. long and 10 m. wheat, barley, rice, and summer high. Late Assyrian, Median, vegetables were grown for local early Islamic. consumption. Fish from the Zab was 36. Ghaznah: Large mound, some another staple food. 200 m. long and 21 m. high. The first season of excavation Assyrian, Median, early Islamic. lasted from 10th. July to 15th October, 37. Araban: Some 250 m. long and 1956. It was directed by the present 20 m. high. Assyrian, Median, writer, with Sd. Borhan Chelmiran as Islamic. field assistant and registerar; Sd. Sha'lan 38. Qara Tepe Kun (in Qaratepe Hussein acted as camp-manager and Sd. village): Some 300 m. long and Hassan Azam as accountant. Sd. 15 m. high. Prehistoric, Middle Muhammad Hamidha helped with the and Late Assyrian, Sassanian, surveying and Sd. Isa Toma was early Islamic. foreman. I am greatly indebted to all my 39. Kirdel: Some 200 m. long and 10 colleagues for their assistance and ingenuity. could be recovered. The foundations of level II had sometimes cut into level III, The Excavations: and Islamic sherds where mixed with a high proportion of much earlier material. Two trenches 20 m. wide were Level III contained, apart from originally opened: (A) stretched 40 m. the temple described below, no building eastwards from the summit of the mound remains at all. The sherds suggested a on its northern side, and (B) 25 m. date towards the middle or end of the westwards. The area between the second millennium B.C., and this level trenches proved to contain a temple, and (or possibly level II) may be the source work was eventually concentrated here, of some fragments of Middle Assyrian with slight extensions to north and south. tablets5 which were found in a pit cut There were five levels (I-V Starting from into level IV just south of the temple. the top), only strips 5 m. wide were Level IV incorporated two excavated below level II in trenches (A) phases of an earlier version of the and (B).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Neo-Assyrian Legal Document from Tell Sitak
    Offprint from At the Dawn of History Ancient Near Eastern Studies in Honour of J. N. Postgate Volume 1 edited by YAğmUR HEFFRON, ADAM STONE, and MARTIN WORTHINGTON Winona Lake, Indiana EISENBRAUNS 2017 Copyright © 2017 Eisenbrauns Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. www.eisenbrauns.com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Heffron, Yağmur, editor. | Stone, Adam, 1981– editor. | Worthington, Martin, editor. | Postgate, J. N., honoree. Title: At the Dawn of History : Ancient Near Eastern Studies in Honour of J.N. Postgate / edited by Yağmur Heffron, Adam Stone, and Martin Worthington. Description: Winona Lake, Indiana : Eisenbrauns, 2017. | Includes bibliographical references. | Description based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed. Identifiers: LCCN 2016049835 (print) | LCCN 2016049136 (ebook) | ISBN 9781575064741 (ePDF 2-volume set) | ISBN 9781575064710 (cloth, set 2 volumes : alk. paper) | ISBN 9781575064727 (volume 1 : alk. paper) | ISBN 9781575064734 (volume 2 : alk. paper) Subjects: LCSH: Iraq—Civilization—To 634. | Iraq—History—To 634. | Iraq— Antiquities. | Civilization, Assyro-Babylonian. | Akkadian language—Texts. Classification: LCC DS69.5 (print) | LCC DS69.5 .A86 2017 (ebook) | DDC 935—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016049835 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984.♾™ Contents Volume 1 Editors’ Preface . ix Nicholas Postgate’s Publications . xiii A Fragment of a Stele from Umma . 1 LAMIA AL-GAILANI WERR In the Shade of the Assyrian Orchards . 7 MARIE-FRANÇOISE BESNIER The Šu-Suen Year 9 sa2-du11 ku5-ra2 Flour Dossier from Puzriš-Dagan .
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Tell Al-Imsihly: the 2000 and 2001 Seasons Hafiz Hussein Al-Hayyany, Qaiss Hussein Rasheed, Hussein Ali Hamza, and Mark Altaweel
    Report on Tell al-Imsihly: The 2000 and 2001 Seasons Hafiz Hussein Al-Hayyany, Qaiss Hussein Rasheed, Hussein Ali Hamza, and Mark Altaweel Introduction a ,(تل (الامسيحليThis article summarizes two seasons of excavations at Tell al-Imsihly prehistoric site nearly 5 kilometers south of Assur. Archaeological excavations were conducted by Iraq’s State Board of Antiquities and Heritage (SBAH) over a period of two seasons starting in April 2000 and ending in late 2001. Iraqi archaeologists working at Assur were put in charge of investigating the site. Due to damage and incursions on the site from plowing and earthmoving activities, the goals of SBAH’s excavations were to obtain an idea of settlement chronology and activity within and just outside of Tell al-Imsihly. In 2006-2007, Dr. Altaweel collaborated with the Iraqi archaeologists who had excavated the site in order to assist in interpreting some of the archaeological data as well as publication of the excavations to a wide audience. Some original items and records from the excavations are not currently available, and perhaps lost, but the archaeological report compiled by Mr. Hamza and written in Arabic remains. In addition, many of the ceramic drawings and excavation photographs have survived. The data presented by the Arabic report are the basis of the presentation to follow, although some additional details have been provided by Altaweel. Site Background Tell al-Imsihly is located on the west bank of the Tigris along Wadi al-Imsihly, a wadi that flows north to south. Wadi al-Imsihly flows into Wadi al-Shbabit, which is a wadi that flows into the Tigris from west to east.
    [Show full text]
  • Eblaites - Oxford Reference
    Eblaites - Oxford Reference https://www-oxfordreference-com.ezaccess.libraries.psu.edu/view/10.10... The Oxford Encyclopedia of Archaeology in the Near East Edited by Eric M. Meyers Publisher: Oxford University Press Print Publication Date: 1997 Print ISBN-13: 9780195065121 Published online: 2011 Current Online Version: 2011 eISBN: 9780199892280 Eblaites. Scholars utilize the ethnonym Eblaites to refer to the people of Ebla, a major Bronze Age city-state in northern Syria. Discussions about the identity of peoples, especially in the Near East, typically rely on factors such as the identification of the language utilized and the gods worshiped. Thus, because the eblaite language is Semitic and many of the gods worshiped at Ebla occur elsewhere in the pantheons of other Semitic peoples, it is generally accepted that the Eblaites were a Semitic people. However, a host of problems specific to refining this statement continues to be debated. The classification of the Eblaite language within the Semitic family of languages is the center of a sharp debate. Some scholars view Eblaite as a dialect of Old Akkadian, in which case it would be proper to speak of the Eblaites as a branch of the East Semites (Akkadians, Assyrians, and Babylonians). Other scholars view Eblaite as a branch of West Semitic, with an especially close relationship to other West Semitic languages utilized in Syria (in particular, the roughly contemporary Amorite and the later-attested Aramaic). The majority of the evidence favors the latter opinion. To cite one example, the Eblaite first-person independent pronoun I is 'ana, exactly as in Amorite and Aramaic.
    [Show full text]
  • Interaction of Aramaeans and Assyrians on the Lower Khabur
    Syria Archéologie, art et histoire 86 | 2009 Dossier : Interaction entre Assyriens et Araméens Interaction of Aramaeans and Assyrians on the Lower Khabur Hartmut Kühne Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/syria/509 DOI: 10.4000/syria.509 ISSN: 2076-8435 Publisher IFPO - Institut français du Proche-Orient Printed version Date of publication: 1 November 2009 Number of pages: 43-54 ISBN: 9782351591512 ISSN: 0039-7946 Electronic reference Hartmut Kühne, « Interaction of Aramaeans and Assyrians on the Lower Khabur », Syria [Online], 86 | 2009, Online since 01 July 2016, connection on 22 May 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/ syria/509 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/syria.509 © Presses IFPO INTERACTION OF ARAMAEANS AND ASSYRIANS ON THE LOWER KHABUR Hartmut KÜHNE Freie Universität Berlin Résumé – Le modèle centre/périphérie a souvent été utilisé pour expliquer les relations entre Assyriens et Araméens. Il est de plus en plus clair que ce modèle n’est pas apte à rendre compte de l’interaction entre ces deux groupes ethniques. Il convient de se défaire de l’idée de l’influence sur la périphérie et de chercher plutôt les signes des processus d’émulation qui ont lieu entre deux groupes équivalents culturellement et qui s’affrontent dans un territoire sans suprématie politique. Au cours du temps — environ 500 ans, entre 1100 et 600 av. J.-C. —, la situation politique change et avec elle les formes de l’interaction perceptibles au travers des différents traits culturels, illustrés par les objets découverts en fouille. De fait, on doit s’attendre à ce que ces objets reflètent différentes étapes d’émulation et deviennent potentiellement des hybrides, plus ou moins élaborés, ou des transferts plus ou moins profondément modifiés.
    [Show full text]
  • The Appearance of Bricks in Ancient Mesopotamia
    Athens Journal of History - Volume 6, Issue 1, January 2020 – Pages 73-96 The Appearance of Bricks in Ancient Mesopotamia By Kadim Hasson Hnaihen Mesopotamia is a region in the Middle East, situated in a basin between two big rivers- the Tigris and the Euphrates. About 5,500 years ago, much earlier than in Egypt, ancient civilization began, one of the oldest in the world. Continuous development was an important factor of everyday life. A warm climate, fertile soil, mixed with the sediment of flowing rivers and perhaps even the first oak all. A deficit of stone for building shelter was an impediment that the Sumerians faced, but from this shortage they found the perfect solution for their construction-brick. Shelter, homes and other buildings were built from material available in the area, such as clay, cane, soil, mule. Sumerians mastered the art of civic construction perfectly. They raised great buildings, made of bricks (Ziggurats, temples, and palaces) richly decorated with sculptures and mosaics. In this article I will focus on the most interesting time period in my opinion- when brick appeared, I will comment upon the process of production and the types of the brick used in Mesopotamia. It should be noted that the form we know today has been shaped by the cultural and social influences of many peoples who have successively settled these lands, continuing to a large extent the cultural heritage of the former. Introduction The ancient population of Iraq (from the Stone Age, 150,000 BC to 8,000 BC) inhabiting Mesopotamia is one of the oldest civilizations to be discovered.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesopotamian Art First Term 1959
    Mesopotamian Art First term 1959 Civilization (‘urban society’), as I said last Thursday, began somewhat earlier in Ancient Mesopotamia than in Egypt. Let us begin by looking at a map of the region. The first settlers in Mesopotamia, the land of the two rivers, appear to have come from the Persian Highlands to the east, those who settled in the marshlands of the Tigris-Euphrates delta developed an urban economy which was at all times more decentralized than Egypt’s—the local towns always retaining a large measure of autonomy in their own affairs. These first settlers were united by a common culture as expressed in the buildings and sculpture, but not by a common language: for Sumerian was spoken in [south Sumer] and Akkadian, a Semitic language in the north. To the west of the Mesopotamia is the Arabian desert, to the north the plains of Syria, and to the north and north-east the Armenian and the Persian Highlands. Note the positions of Al-Ubaid, Ur, Eridu and Larsa situated in southern Mesopotamia, the ancient Sumer. They were at that time quite close to the shores of the Persian Gulf— for the delta of the river has been built up considerably in the past 5,000 years. To the north of Sumer, was Akkad, with such towns as Khafaje, Tell Asmar, Babylon and Tell Agrab. And further to the north were Tel Halaf, Tel Brak, Nineveh, Assur, Tepe Gawra and Samara. Mari was in the extreme west of the cultural area, Susa in the extreme East. The earliest settlement in the region occurred in the north.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection Report About the Archaeological Sites in Al Balikh
    Detection report about the archaeological The Authority Of Tourism and sites in Al Balikh basin and Euphrates valley Protection Of Antiquities in Al Jazira Canton Manbej Kobani Tell Abyad ( Gere Spi ) Prepared by : Rustem Abdo - Adnan Al Bari Translated by : Amer Ahmed - Nergez Bijo Since the Syrian crises has broken out on March in 2011 the legacy became lives a real danger where vandalism and robbery reached to cataclysmic phase threatens to erase the immortal humanity civilization Since two years the Authority of Tourism and protection of Antiquities has founded in Al Jazira Canton this Authority belong to Democratic Self – Management to protect the archaeological sites by a group of archaeologists .. After liberating Kobani , Tell Abyad ( Gere Sbi ) and Manbej by people protection Units and Democratic Syrian forces we have documented some of their sites by delegation from the Authority ( Beryvan Yunes – Rustem Abdo – Adnan Al Bari – Nejbir Ibrahim ) by coordinating with administration of these cities these cities are as following : Manbej located 80 Km northeast of Aleppo it was called during the Roman and Greece period ( Herapolis ) and the oldest mention of it dates back to end of second millennium and beginning of first millennium B . C . in the Assyrian tablets .. Hmam Al Kabir Located eastern of public garden it has been built in end of Othman period as written on the bathroom door shows that , the bathroom is generally in good situation The public garden located beside the pitch and it has been built above a Greece temple that was belong to one of gods it has become as exhibition to displays the sculptural arts those found accidently in the city during construction work After detection we have noticed secret excavation in the east part of the garden where found a drawer leads to the entrance .
    [Show full text]
  • Israel & the Assyrians
    ISRAEL & THE ASSYRIANS Deuteronomy, the Succession Treaty of Esarhaddon, & the Nature of Subversion C. L. Crouch Ancient Near East Monographs – Monografías sobre el Antiguo Cercano Oriente Society of Biblical Literature Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente (UCA) Israel and the assyrIans ancient near east Monographs General Editors ehud Ben Zvi roxana Flammini Editorial Board reinhard achenbach esther J. hamori steven W. holloway rené Krüger alan lenzi steven l. McKenzie Martti nissinen Graciela Gestoso singer Juan Manuel tebes Volume Editor Ehud Ben Zvi number 8 Israel and the assyrIans Deuteronomy, the Succession Treaty of Esarhaddon, and the Nature of Subversion Israel and the assyrIans Deuteronomy, the Succession Treaty of Esarhaddon, and the Nature of Subversion C. l. Crouch sBl Press atlanta Copyright © 2014 by sBl Press all rights reserved. no part of this work may be reproduced or published in print form except with permission from the publisher. Individuals are free to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in whole or in part by electronic means or by means of any informa- tion or retrieval system under the following conditions: (1) they must include with the work notice of ownership of the copyright by the society of Biblical literature; (2) they may not use the work for commercial purposes; and (3) they may not alter, transform, or build upon the work. requests for permission should be addressed in writing to the rights and Permissions Office, sBl Press, 825 houston Mill road, atlanta, Ga 30329, Usa. The ancient near east Monographs/Monografi as sobre el antiguo Cercano Oriente series is published jointly by sBl Press and the Universidad Católica argentina Facultad de Ciencias sociales, Políticas y de la Comunicación, Centro de estudios de historia del antiguo Oriente.
    [Show full text]
  • KARUS on the FRONTIERS of the NEO-ASSYRIAN EMPIRE I Shigeo
    KARUS ON THE FRONTIERS OF THE NEO-ASSYRIAN EMPIRE I Shigeo YAMADA * The paper discusses the evidence for the harbors, trading posts, and/or administrative centers called karu in Neo-Assyrian documentary sources, especially those constructed on the frontiers of the Assyrian empire during the ninth to seventh centuries Be. New Assyrian cities on the frontiers were often given names that stress the glory and strength of Assyrian kings and gods. Kar-X, i.e., "Quay of X" (X = a royal/divine name), is one of the main types. Names of this sort, given to cities of administrative significance, were probably chosen to show that the Assyrians were ready to enhance the local economy. An exhaustive examination of the evidence relating to cities named Kar-X and those called karu or bit-kar; on the western frontiers illustrates the advance of Assyrian colonization and trade control, which eventually spread over the entire region of the eastern Mediterranean. The Assyrian kiirus on the frontiers served to secure local trading activities according to agreements between the Assyrian king and local rulers and traders, while representing first and foremost the interest of the former party. The official in charge of the kiiru(s), the rab-kari, appears to have worked as a royal deputy, directly responsible for the revenue of the royal house from two main sources: (1) taxes imposed on merchandise and merchants passing through the trade center(s) under his control, and (2) tribute exacted from countries of vassal status. He thus played a significant role in Assyrian exploitation of economic resources from areas beyond the jurisdiction of the Assyrian provincial government.
    [Show full text]
  • Timelines of Ancient Civilizations: Mesopotamia 1
    C a p t i o n e d M e d i a P r o g r a m #9946 TIMELINES OF ANCIENT CIVILIZATIONS: MESOPOTAMIA 1 FILM IDEAS, INC, 2003 Grade Level: 8-12 18 mins. DESCRIPTION Introduces Mesopotamia, the region between the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers known as the Fertile Crescent or the “cradle of civilization.” Describes the importance of these rivers in the development of civilizations. Focuses first on accomplishments of the Sumerians: irrigation, written language, metal work, the wheel, and more. The Akkadians followed the Sumerians, adapting and improving their inventions, only to be overcome by the next important culture–Babylon. ACADEMIC STANDARDS Subject Area: World History–Era 2–Early Civilizations and the Rise of Pastoral Peoples, 4000-1000 B • Standard: Understands the major characteristics of civilization and the development of civilizations in Mesopotamia, Egypt, and the Indus Valley Benchmark: Understands environmental and cultural factors that shaped the development of Mesopotamia, Egypt and the Indus Valley (e.g., development of religious and ethical belief systems and how they legitimized political and social order; demands of the natural environment; how written records such as the Epic of Gilgamesh reflected and shaped the political, religious, and cultural life of Mesopotamia) (See INSTRUCTIONAL GOALS 2, 3, and 5.) Subject Area: Geography–The World in Spatial Terms • Standard: Knows the location of places, geographic features, and patterns of the environment Benchmark: Knows the location of physical and human features on maps and
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 23 the Neo-Assyrian Provincial Administration at Tayinat
    Chapter 23 The Neo-Assyrian provincial administration at Tayinat (ancient Kunalia) Timothy Harrison Excavations at Tell Tayinat, located on the Plain of century prompted key changes to its organizational Antioch in southeast Turkey, have uncovered the structure. These included a significant reorganiza- remains of a late Neo-Assyrian settlement (c. late tion of the Assyrian provincial system, although this eighth–seventh centuries bc), including an Assyrian reorganization appears to have been initiated prior to governor’s residence and, most recently, a temple and Tiglath-pileser III (744–727 bc), and the considerable a collection of cuneiform tablets dating to this period. expansion Assyria experienced during his rule, possi- Historical sources attest that Tayinat (ancient Kunu- bly as early as the reign of Adad-nerari III (810–783 bc) lua) was destroyed by Tiglath-pileser III in 738 bc, (Postgate 1995, 2–5; Radner 2006, 43; Kühne 2013, 483, and then transformed into an Assyrian provincial 488–9; contra Harrison 2005, 24, and others). Provinces capital, renamed Kinalia, or Kunalia, as indicated within the Assyrian core (the ‘Land of Aššur’) were in the recently discovered Esarhaddon Oath Tablet, reduced in size, while the system as a whole expanded and supplied with its own governor and provincial considerably, as conquered lands were annexed to administration. The archaeology of the Late Iron Age the heartland. These changes, not surprisingly, pre- settlement at Tayinat therefore offers an opportunity cipitated a shift in the balance of power away from to examine both the physical dimensions of a Neo- the leading political families of Assyria, whose power Assyrian provincial centre, but also the bureaucratic was based in the home provinces, to an increasingly organization that was established to administer it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Linguistic Classification of Eblaite: Methods, Problems, and Results
    Originalveröffentlichung in: J.S. Cooper – G.M. Schwartz (Hg.), The Study of the Ancient Near East in the Twenty-First Century. The William Foxwell Albright Centennial Conference, Winona Lake 1996, S. 233-249 The Linguistic Classification of Eblaite: Methods, Problems, and Results MANFRED KREBERNIK Soon after the royal archives from Ebla were unearthed, the nature of the Semitic language contained in the texts from these archives became a much-disputed ques­ tion in the fields of Assyriology and Old Testament studies. It is understandable that the ensuing discussion did not proceed from the beginning in a logical and meth­ odologically clear way. One of the reasons for this was the fact that preliminary, and not always correct, citations from the texts often had to serve as arguments before the first major text publications appeared. Furthermore, the geographical and chro­ nological setting of the settlement itself sometimes resulted in wild speculation. We were confronted with the earliest Semitic texts so far known, and the geographical situation of the site raised hope that the language of these texts might be a precursor of later Northwest Semitic. Therefore, the texts immediately aroused the special in­ terest of scholars of the Old Testament. However, many of the connections between Ebla and the world of the Old Testament claimed in the early stages of Eblaite stud­ ies turned out to be wrong or improbable once more material became accessible and was studied more systematically. Thus, alleged attestations of biblical toponyms or of the name of Yahweh had to be abandoned, and the chronological distance between Ebla and the Bible was better taken into account.
    [Show full text]