Chapter 23 the Neo-Assyrian Provincial Administration at Tayinat

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 23 the Neo-Assyrian Provincial Administration at Tayinat Chapter 23 The Neo-Assyrian provincial administration at Tayinat (ancient Kunalia) Timothy Harrison Excavations at Tell Tayinat, located on the Plain of century prompted key changes to its organizational Antioch in southeast Turkey, have uncovered the structure. These included a significant reorganiza- remains of a late Neo-Assyrian settlement (c. late tion of the Assyrian provincial system, although this eighth–seventh centuries bc), including an Assyrian reorganization appears to have been initiated prior to governor’s residence and, most recently, a temple and Tiglath-pileser III (744–727 bc), and the considerable a collection of cuneiform tablets dating to this period. expansion Assyria experienced during his rule, possi- Historical sources attest that Tayinat (ancient Kunu- bly as early as the reign of Adad-nerari III (810–783 bc) lua) was destroyed by Tiglath-pileser III in 738 bc, (Postgate 1995, 2–5; Radner 2006, 43; Kühne 2013, 483, and then transformed into an Assyrian provincial 488–9; contra Harrison 2005, 24, and others). Provinces capital, renamed Kinalia, or Kunalia, as indicated within the Assyrian core (the ‘Land of Aššur’) were in the recently discovered Esarhaddon Oath Tablet, reduced in size, while the system as a whole expanded and supplied with its own governor and provincial considerably, as conquered lands were annexed to administration. The archaeology of the Late Iron Age the heartland. These changes, not surprisingly, pre- settlement at Tayinat therefore offers an opportunity cipitated a shift in the balance of power away from to examine both the physical dimensions of a Neo- the leading political families of Assyria, whose power Assyrian provincial centre, but also the bureaucratic was based in the home provinces, to an increasingly organization that was established to administer it. centralized government administration, controlled This paper will review the results of the Syrian- directly by the king (Grayson 1991a, 203–4; Postgate Hittite Expedition’s excavations at Tell Tayinat in the 1979, 193–4; 1992; 2007, 338–43). 1930s, together with the results of the ongoing Tayinat Although very little documentary evidence Archaeological Project investigations from this period. of this provincial administrative system exists, an They reveal a carefully planned provincial capital that ‘invisible’ hierarchical structure can be gleaned from incorporated Assyrian architectural elements and disparate sources, such as the occasional letters and imperial ideology skillfully interwoven with indig- administrative documents that were a by-product of enous social and cultural institutions. the machinery of government itself (Postgate 2007, 332). Together, these documents convey the ethos of a Neo-Assyrian imperial administration formally regulated administration, with a clear chain of command and delegated authority descending from The historical development of the Neo-Assyrian the king, but they rarely provide actual descriptions empire has been the focus of considerable study. Less of any particular office or its administrative duties well-documented has been the imperial bureaucracy and responsibilities (Postgate 2007, 334–8). Indeed, as that evolved to administer it, and in particular the Postgate concludes (2007, 358), the evidence indicates provincial administrations established in the periph- that the Neo-Assyrian imperial administration was eral regions annexed to the empire as it expanded. fundamentally non-bureaucratic, and depended on a This is in part because Assyrian royal inscriptions, sense of institutional loyalty and personal interaction though voluminous, were not concerned primarily throughout the system, both at the royal court and in with conveying such information (Postgate 2007, 331). the provinces, for it to function effectively. It is clear, nevertheless, that the rapid expansion of the At the provincial level, each province appears to Assyrian empire in the latter decades of the eighth have been governed by an administration that mir- 253 Chapter 23 rored the organizational structure of the royal court draining production and investment away from the at the imperial centre. In the newer provinces, these agricultural hinterland (Postgate 1979, 216–17). were typically established at the former capitals of vanquished states, which often lent the new provinces Neo-Assyrian Kunalia their names. Each province was administered by a governor (bēl pāhiti), who in turn was assisted by a The earliest Neo-Assyrian references to the North deputy (šaknu, or šaniu, literally ‘the second one’), or Orontes Valley region date to the reign of Ashurnasirpal deputies (šaknūte), and a major domo (rab bēti). The II (883–859 bc), and coincide with expanding Assyrian governor’s primary duties included maintenance of interest in the region. Patina (kurpa-ti-na-a-a) is first men- the province’s road networks and infrastructure, the tioned in the Banquet Stele (c. 879 bc) (Grayson 1991b, levying and collection of taxes, the distribution of 290, 293, A.0.101.30, lines 35, 144). More revealing is land, the preservation of law and order, and command Ashurnasirpal’s account of his campaign to north- of the locally stationed military garrison (generally, west Syria (c. 870 bc), in which he describes receiving the ṣ āb šarri, or ‘king’s troops’, and comprised of both tribute from Lubarna, king of Patina, at his royal city Assyrians and auxiliaries). The governor, in other Kunulua (uruku-nu-lu-a), before crossing the Orontes words, held overall authority and responsibility for River and continuing to the south (Grayson 1991b, both the civilian and military affairs of the province. 216–19, A.0.101.1, col. iii, lines 71–80). The account Under him, however, the delegation of authority places Patina in the Amuq Plain, and its capital Kunu- became more specialized, and responsibilities were lua north of the Orontes River, leaving Tell Tayinat the organized according to their civilian or military only viable candidate (Fig. 23.1). This identification has jurisdictions, although it is not always clear from the now been confirmed by the Esarhaddon Oath Tablet title of an office to which jurisdiction it was assigned found at the site (Lauinger 2011; 2012, 112, specifically (Postgate 2007, 333–34, 352–8). The šaknu was typically line T i 3; see further below). a military rank, though not exclusively so, and there Over the next century, Patina was an active is evidence that civilian authority had a hierarchical participant in a succession of anti-Assyrian coalitions structure similar to the military administration. The that attempted to thwart their westward expansion provincial military command appears to have been (for a more thorough review of this political history, organized according to a simple four-tiered hierarchy: see Hawkins 1982; Harrison 2001, 116–22; Osborne the governor as overall commander, followed by the 2011, 18–29). The Assyrians occasionally also became šaknu, the cohort commander, or ‘commander of 50’ embroiled in local conflicts. The most notable occurred (rab kiṣ ri), and then the ordinary soldier (Postgate in 829 bc, and is recorded on the Black Obelisk. We 2007, 343–7). are told that Lubarna (II?), king of Patina, was assas- Within the civilian administration, a secondary sinated by ‘the people of the land’ and a commoner administrative tier was occupied by ‘village inspec- inserted on the throne in his place, prompting Shal- tors’ (rab ālāni), who monitored the various districts maneser III to intercede and replace the usurper (qannu) that made up the provincial hinterland, and with his own ally (Grayson 1996, 69, A.0.102.14, lines reported to the governor. To ensure that the provincial 146b–56). For reasons that remain unclear, the name administration functioned efficiently – and in keeping of the kingdom shifted from Patina to Unqi (kurun-qi) with the dictates of the central government – provin- during this period as well. cial governors were expected to submit regular reports Finally, in 743 bc, Tiglath-pileser III launched his to the king, and their administrations were audited assault on the Syro-Hittite states of northwest Syria by officials who answered directly to the royal court (Hawkins 1982, 410–11; Grayson 1991a, 74–6). This (Postgate 1979, 216; Pečīrková 1977, 213–15; 1987, led, in 738 bc, to a campaign against the kingdom of 169–74; Grayson 1991a, 203–4). Unqi, justified by Tiglath-pileser on the grounds that The governor’s residence, or palace, thus formed Tutammu, king of Unqi, had broken his loyalty oath the operational hub of each province’s administration, with Assyria. The result, Tiglath-pileser reports, was functionally and structurally replicating the royal that Tutammu ‘disregarded his life’, his royal city palace at the regional level. By concentrating admin- Kunulua (specifically, ‘Kinalia’ uru[ Ki-na-li-a]) was istrative decision-making, and authority, in the hands captured, and many of its citizens were deported. of the governor, and localizing this activity within Tiglath-pileser then established Kunulua as the his residence, the Neo-Assyrian provincial system capital of a new Assyrian province called Kinalia, effectively consolidated power, and by extension the and installed a eunuch (ša rēši) as governor (bēl pāhiti) economic wealth of a province, in its capital. In time, (Tadmor & Yamada 2011, 39–40 [Tiglath-pileser III this may have had the unintended consequence of 12], 115 [Tiglath-pileser III 46], 131 [Tiglath-pileser III 254 The Neo-Assyrian provincial administration at Tayinat (ancient Kunalia) Gavur Dağları/ Amanus Mts. Kara Su Kurt Dağ Kızıl Dağ Tell Tayinat & Tell Atchana The Afrin River Valley Antakya/ Antioch Jabal al-Ala’ Orontes R./ Asi N. Jabal al-Aqra/ Mt. Cassius Sites Int. boundary The Amuq Elevation and Afrin Valleys High: 2200 m 0 5 10 20 30 km Low: 1 m Figure 23.1. Regional map showing the North Orontes Valley and the location of Tell Tayinat (created by S. Batiuk). 255 Chapter 23 49]; see also Kessler 1975). Kinalia, or Kullania, as it was one of the more significant additions to the citadel appears alternatively in a number of administrative during this period (Haines 1971, 43–4).
Recommended publications
  • A Neo-Assyrian Legal Document from Tell Sitak
    Offprint from At the Dawn of History Ancient Near Eastern Studies in Honour of J. N. Postgate Volume 1 edited by YAğmUR HEFFRON, ADAM STONE, and MARTIN WORTHINGTON Winona Lake, Indiana EISENBRAUNS 2017 Copyright © 2017 Eisenbrauns Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. www.eisenbrauns.com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Heffron, Yağmur, editor. | Stone, Adam, 1981– editor. | Worthington, Martin, editor. | Postgate, J. N., honoree. Title: At the Dawn of History : Ancient Near Eastern Studies in Honour of J.N. Postgate / edited by Yağmur Heffron, Adam Stone, and Martin Worthington. Description: Winona Lake, Indiana : Eisenbrauns, 2017. | Includes bibliographical references. | Description based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed. Identifiers: LCCN 2016049835 (print) | LCCN 2016049136 (ebook) | ISBN 9781575064741 (ePDF 2-volume set) | ISBN 9781575064710 (cloth, set 2 volumes : alk. paper) | ISBN 9781575064727 (volume 1 : alk. paper) | ISBN 9781575064734 (volume 2 : alk. paper) Subjects: LCSH: Iraq—Civilization—To 634. | Iraq—History—To 634. | Iraq— Antiquities. | Civilization, Assyro-Babylonian. | Akkadian language—Texts. Classification: LCC DS69.5 (print) | LCC DS69.5 .A86 2017 (ebook) | DDC 935—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016049835 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984.♾™ Contents Volume 1 Editors’ Preface . ix Nicholas Postgate’s Publications . xiii A Fragment of a Stele from Umma . 1 LAMIA AL-GAILANI WERR In the Shade of the Assyrian Orchards . 7 MARIE-FRANÇOISE BESNIER The Šu-Suen Year 9 sa2-du11 ku5-ra2 Flour Dossier from Puzriš-Dagan .
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Tell Al-Imsihly: the 2000 and 2001 Seasons Hafiz Hussein Al-Hayyany, Qaiss Hussein Rasheed, Hussein Ali Hamza, and Mark Altaweel
    Report on Tell al-Imsihly: The 2000 and 2001 Seasons Hafiz Hussein Al-Hayyany, Qaiss Hussein Rasheed, Hussein Ali Hamza, and Mark Altaweel Introduction a ,(تل (الامسيحليThis article summarizes two seasons of excavations at Tell al-Imsihly prehistoric site nearly 5 kilometers south of Assur. Archaeological excavations were conducted by Iraq’s State Board of Antiquities and Heritage (SBAH) over a period of two seasons starting in April 2000 and ending in late 2001. Iraqi archaeologists working at Assur were put in charge of investigating the site. Due to damage and incursions on the site from plowing and earthmoving activities, the goals of SBAH’s excavations were to obtain an idea of settlement chronology and activity within and just outside of Tell al-Imsihly. In 2006-2007, Dr. Altaweel collaborated with the Iraqi archaeologists who had excavated the site in order to assist in interpreting some of the archaeological data as well as publication of the excavations to a wide audience. Some original items and records from the excavations are not currently available, and perhaps lost, but the archaeological report compiled by Mr. Hamza and written in Arabic remains. In addition, many of the ceramic drawings and excavation photographs have survived. The data presented by the Arabic report are the basis of the presentation to follow, although some additional details have been provided by Altaweel. Site Background Tell al-Imsihly is located on the west bank of the Tigris along Wadi al-Imsihly, a wadi that flows north to south. Wadi al-Imsihly flows into Wadi al-Shbabit, which is a wadi that flows into the Tigris from west to east.
    [Show full text]
  • Eblaites - Oxford Reference
    Eblaites - Oxford Reference https://www-oxfordreference-com.ezaccess.libraries.psu.edu/view/10.10... The Oxford Encyclopedia of Archaeology in the Near East Edited by Eric M. Meyers Publisher: Oxford University Press Print Publication Date: 1997 Print ISBN-13: 9780195065121 Published online: 2011 Current Online Version: 2011 eISBN: 9780199892280 Eblaites. Scholars utilize the ethnonym Eblaites to refer to the people of Ebla, a major Bronze Age city-state in northern Syria. Discussions about the identity of peoples, especially in the Near East, typically rely on factors such as the identification of the language utilized and the gods worshiped. Thus, because the eblaite language is Semitic and many of the gods worshiped at Ebla occur elsewhere in the pantheons of other Semitic peoples, it is generally accepted that the Eblaites were a Semitic people. However, a host of problems specific to refining this statement continues to be debated. The classification of the Eblaite language within the Semitic family of languages is the center of a sharp debate. Some scholars view Eblaite as a dialect of Old Akkadian, in which case it would be proper to speak of the Eblaites as a branch of the East Semites (Akkadians, Assyrians, and Babylonians). Other scholars view Eblaite as a branch of West Semitic, with an especially close relationship to other West Semitic languages utilized in Syria (in particular, the roughly contemporary Amorite and the later-attested Aramaic). The majority of the evidence favors the latter opinion. To cite one example, the Eblaite first-person independent pronoun I is 'ana, exactly as in Amorite and Aramaic.
    [Show full text]
  • Interaction of Aramaeans and Assyrians on the Lower Khabur
    Syria Archéologie, art et histoire 86 | 2009 Dossier : Interaction entre Assyriens et Araméens Interaction of Aramaeans and Assyrians on the Lower Khabur Hartmut Kühne Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/syria/509 DOI: 10.4000/syria.509 ISSN: 2076-8435 Publisher IFPO - Institut français du Proche-Orient Printed version Date of publication: 1 November 2009 Number of pages: 43-54 ISBN: 9782351591512 ISSN: 0039-7946 Electronic reference Hartmut Kühne, « Interaction of Aramaeans and Assyrians on the Lower Khabur », Syria [Online], 86 | 2009, Online since 01 July 2016, connection on 22 May 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/ syria/509 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/syria.509 © Presses IFPO INTERACTION OF ARAMAEANS AND ASSYRIANS ON THE LOWER KHABUR Hartmut KÜHNE Freie Universität Berlin Résumé – Le modèle centre/périphérie a souvent été utilisé pour expliquer les relations entre Assyriens et Araméens. Il est de plus en plus clair que ce modèle n’est pas apte à rendre compte de l’interaction entre ces deux groupes ethniques. Il convient de se défaire de l’idée de l’influence sur la périphérie et de chercher plutôt les signes des processus d’émulation qui ont lieu entre deux groupes équivalents culturellement et qui s’affrontent dans un territoire sans suprématie politique. Au cours du temps — environ 500 ans, entre 1100 et 600 av. J.-C. —, la situation politique change et avec elle les formes de l’interaction perceptibles au travers des différents traits culturels, illustrés par les objets découverts en fouille. De fait, on doit s’attendre à ce que ces objets reflètent différentes étapes d’émulation et deviennent potentiellement des hybrides, plus ou moins élaborés, ou des transferts plus ou moins profondément modifiés.
    [Show full text]
  • The Appearance of Bricks in Ancient Mesopotamia
    Athens Journal of History - Volume 6, Issue 1, January 2020 – Pages 73-96 The Appearance of Bricks in Ancient Mesopotamia By Kadim Hasson Hnaihen Mesopotamia is a region in the Middle East, situated in a basin between two big rivers- the Tigris and the Euphrates. About 5,500 years ago, much earlier than in Egypt, ancient civilization began, one of the oldest in the world. Continuous development was an important factor of everyday life. A warm climate, fertile soil, mixed with the sediment of flowing rivers and perhaps even the first oak all. A deficit of stone for building shelter was an impediment that the Sumerians faced, but from this shortage they found the perfect solution for their construction-brick. Shelter, homes and other buildings were built from material available in the area, such as clay, cane, soil, mule. Sumerians mastered the art of civic construction perfectly. They raised great buildings, made of bricks (Ziggurats, temples, and palaces) richly decorated with sculptures and mosaics. In this article I will focus on the most interesting time period in my opinion- when brick appeared, I will comment upon the process of production and the types of the brick used in Mesopotamia. It should be noted that the form we know today has been shaped by the cultural and social influences of many peoples who have successively settled these lands, continuing to a large extent the cultural heritage of the former. Introduction The ancient population of Iraq (from the Stone Age, 150,000 BC to 8,000 BC) inhabiting Mesopotamia is one of the oldest civilizations to be discovered.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesopotamian Art First Term 1959
    Mesopotamian Art First term 1959 Civilization (‘urban society’), as I said last Thursday, began somewhat earlier in Ancient Mesopotamia than in Egypt. Let us begin by looking at a map of the region. The first settlers in Mesopotamia, the land of the two rivers, appear to have come from the Persian Highlands to the east, those who settled in the marshlands of the Tigris-Euphrates delta developed an urban economy which was at all times more decentralized than Egypt’s—the local towns always retaining a large measure of autonomy in their own affairs. These first settlers were united by a common culture as expressed in the buildings and sculpture, but not by a common language: for Sumerian was spoken in [south Sumer] and Akkadian, a Semitic language in the north. To the west of the Mesopotamia is the Arabian desert, to the north the plains of Syria, and to the north and north-east the Armenian and the Persian Highlands. Note the positions of Al-Ubaid, Ur, Eridu and Larsa situated in southern Mesopotamia, the ancient Sumer. They were at that time quite close to the shores of the Persian Gulf— for the delta of the river has been built up considerably in the past 5,000 years. To the north of Sumer, was Akkad, with such towns as Khafaje, Tell Asmar, Babylon and Tell Agrab. And further to the north were Tel Halaf, Tel Brak, Nineveh, Assur, Tepe Gawra and Samara. Mari was in the extreme west of the cultural area, Susa in the extreme East. The earliest settlement in the region occurred in the north.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection Report About the Archaeological Sites in Al Balikh
    Detection report about the archaeological The Authority Of Tourism and sites in Al Balikh basin and Euphrates valley Protection Of Antiquities in Al Jazira Canton Manbej Kobani Tell Abyad ( Gere Spi ) Prepared by : Rustem Abdo - Adnan Al Bari Translated by : Amer Ahmed - Nergez Bijo Since the Syrian crises has broken out on March in 2011 the legacy became lives a real danger where vandalism and robbery reached to cataclysmic phase threatens to erase the immortal humanity civilization Since two years the Authority of Tourism and protection of Antiquities has founded in Al Jazira Canton this Authority belong to Democratic Self – Management to protect the archaeological sites by a group of archaeologists .. After liberating Kobani , Tell Abyad ( Gere Sbi ) and Manbej by people protection Units and Democratic Syrian forces we have documented some of their sites by delegation from the Authority ( Beryvan Yunes – Rustem Abdo – Adnan Al Bari – Nejbir Ibrahim ) by coordinating with administration of these cities these cities are as following : Manbej located 80 Km northeast of Aleppo it was called during the Roman and Greece period ( Herapolis ) and the oldest mention of it dates back to end of second millennium and beginning of first millennium B . C . in the Assyrian tablets .. Hmam Al Kabir Located eastern of public garden it has been built in end of Othman period as written on the bathroom door shows that , the bathroom is generally in good situation The public garden located beside the pitch and it has been built above a Greece temple that was belong to one of gods it has become as exhibition to displays the sculptural arts those found accidently in the city during construction work After detection we have noticed secret excavation in the east part of the garden where found a drawer leads to the entrance .
    [Show full text]
  • Israel & the Assyrians
    ISRAEL & THE ASSYRIANS Deuteronomy, the Succession Treaty of Esarhaddon, & the Nature of Subversion C. L. Crouch Ancient Near East Monographs – Monografías sobre el Antiguo Cercano Oriente Society of Biblical Literature Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente (UCA) Israel and the assyrIans ancient near east Monographs General Editors ehud Ben Zvi roxana Flammini Editorial Board reinhard achenbach esther J. hamori steven W. holloway rené Krüger alan lenzi steven l. McKenzie Martti nissinen Graciela Gestoso singer Juan Manuel tebes Volume Editor Ehud Ben Zvi number 8 Israel and the assyrIans Deuteronomy, the Succession Treaty of Esarhaddon, and the Nature of Subversion Israel and the assyrIans Deuteronomy, the Succession Treaty of Esarhaddon, and the Nature of Subversion C. l. Crouch sBl Press atlanta Copyright © 2014 by sBl Press all rights reserved. no part of this work may be reproduced or published in print form except with permission from the publisher. Individuals are free to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in whole or in part by electronic means or by means of any informa- tion or retrieval system under the following conditions: (1) they must include with the work notice of ownership of the copyright by the society of Biblical literature; (2) they may not use the work for commercial purposes; and (3) they may not alter, transform, or build upon the work. requests for permission should be addressed in writing to the rights and Permissions Office, sBl Press, 825 houston Mill road, atlanta, Ga 30329, Usa. The ancient near east Monographs/Monografi as sobre el antiguo Cercano Oriente series is published jointly by sBl Press and the Universidad Católica argentina Facultad de Ciencias sociales, Políticas y de la Comunicación, Centro de estudios de historia del antiguo Oriente.
    [Show full text]
  • KARUS on the FRONTIERS of the NEO-ASSYRIAN EMPIRE I Shigeo
    KARUS ON THE FRONTIERS OF THE NEO-ASSYRIAN EMPIRE I Shigeo YAMADA * The paper discusses the evidence for the harbors, trading posts, and/or administrative centers called karu in Neo-Assyrian documentary sources, especially those constructed on the frontiers of the Assyrian empire during the ninth to seventh centuries Be. New Assyrian cities on the frontiers were often given names that stress the glory and strength of Assyrian kings and gods. Kar-X, i.e., "Quay of X" (X = a royal/divine name), is one of the main types. Names of this sort, given to cities of administrative significance, were probably chosen to show that the Assyrians were ready to enhance the local economy. An exhaustive examination of the evidence relating to cities named Kar-X and those called karu or bit-kar; on the western frontiers illustrates the advance of Assyrian colonization and trade control, which eventually spread over the entire region of the eastern Mediterranean. The Assyrian kiirus on the frontiers served to secure local trading activities according to agreements between the Assyrian king and local rulers and traders, while representing first and foremost the interest of the former party. The official in charge of the kiiru(s), the rab-kari, appears to have worked as a royal deputy, directly responsible for the revenue of the royal house from two main sources: (1) taxes imposed on merchandise and merchants passing through the trade center(s) under his control, and (2) tribute exacted from countries of vassal status. He thus played a significant role in Assyrian exploitation of economic resources from areas beyond the jurisdiction of the Assyrian provincial government.
    [Show full text]
  • Timelines of Ancient Civilizations: Mesopotamia 1
    C a p t i o n e d M e d i a P r o g r a m #9946 TIMELINES OF ANCIENT CIVILIZATIONS: MESOPOTAMIA 1 FILM IDEAS, INC, 2003 Grade Level: 8-12 18 mins. DESCRIPTION Introduces Mesopotamia, the region between the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers known as the Fertile Crescent or the “cradle of civilization.” Describes the importance of these rivers in the development of civilizations. Focuses first on accomplishments of the Sumerians: irrigation, written language, metal work, the wheel, and more. The Akkadians followed the Sumerians, adapting and improving their inventions, only to be overcome by the next important culture–Babylon. ACADEMIC STANDARDS Subject Area: World History–Era 2–Early Civilizations and the Rise of Pastoral Peoples, 4000-1000 B • Standard: Understands the major characteristics of civilization and the development of civilizations in Mesopotamia, Egypt, and the Indus Valley Benchmark: Understands environmental and cultural factors that shaped the development of Mesopotamia, Egypt and the Indus Valley (e.g., development of religious and ethical belief systems and how they legitimized political and social order; demands of the natural environment; how written records such as the Epic of Gilgamesh reflected and shaped the political, religious, and cultural life of Mesopotamia) (See INSTRUCTIONAL GOALS 2, 3, and 5.) Subject Area: Geography–The World in Spatial Terms • Standard: Knows the location of places, geographic features, and patterns of the environment Benchmark: Knows the location of physical and human features on maps and
    [Show full text]
  • The Linguistic Classification of Eblaite: Methods, Problems, and Results
    Originalveröffentlichung in: J.S. Cooper – G.M. Schwartz (Hg.), The Study of the Ancient Near East in the Twenty-First Century. The William Foxwell Albright Centennial Conference, Winona Lake 1996, S. 233-249 The Linguistic Classification of Eblaite: Methods, Problems, and Results MANFRED KREBERNIK Soon after the royal archives from Ebla were unearthed, the nature of the Semitic language contained in the texts from these archives became a much-disputed ques­ tion in the fields of Assyriology and Old Testament studies. It is understandable that the ensuing discussion did not proceed from the beginning in a logical and meth­ odologically clear way. One of the reasons for this was the fact that preliminary, and not always correct, citations from the texts often had to serve as arguments before the first major text publications appeared. Furthermore, the geographical and chro­ nological setting of the settlement itself sometimes resulted in wild speculation. We were confronted with the earliest Semitic texts so far known, and the geographical situation of the site raised hope that the language of these texts might be a precursor of later Northwest Semitic. Therefore, the texts immediately aroused the special in­ terest of scholars of the Old Testament. However, many of the connections between Ebla and the world of the Old Testament claimed in the early stages of Eblaite stud­ ies turned out to be wrong or improbable once more material became accessible and was studied more systematically. Thus, alleged attestations of biblical toponyms or of the name of Yahweh had to be abandoned, and the chronological distance between Ebla and the Bible was better taken into account.
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION A. Neo-Babylonian Legal and Administrative Texts
    INTRODUCTION A. Neo-Babylonian Legal and Administrative Texts: Their Contents and Provenance The textual legacy of southern Mesopotamia during the seventh, sixth and fi fth centuries BCE stands out for its abundance. The vast majority of these texts pertain to legal and administrative, rather than literary, matters. Loans, contracts, sales, marriages, adoptions and other day-to-day affairs were recorded on clay tablets by scribes writing in cuneiform script. Thousands of these tablets are known to today’s scholars, while many more are believed to exist and await discovery or publication.1 Modern Assyriological scholarship refers to these texts as Neo-Babylonian legal and administrative texts. They offer pictures of many aspects of Mesopotamian socio-economic and legal institutions in the centuries immediately preceding the Common Era. From the point-of-view of political history, the term ‘Neo-Babylonian’ refers to a specifi c historical period, which begins with the rise of the Babylonian king Nabopolassar in 626 BCE,2 and lasts until the end of the reign of Nabonidus, when Cyrus and the Achaemenid Persians con- quered Babylonia in 539 BCE. However, because the cuneiform textual record continues unchanged for a considerable time after the Achaeme- nid conquest, for the purposes of studying cuneiform law there is no reason to distinguish between texts written before and after Babylonia came under Persian control. Thus, when the term ‘Neo-Babylonian’ is used to describe cuneiform texts, rather than a specifi c historical period, it can refer to texts written during the Achaemenid period and even to texts written later, during the Hellenistic period (after 330 BCE).3 1 For estimates of the actual numbers, see Michael Jursa, Neo-Babylonian Legal and Administrative Documents: Typology, Contents and Archives (Guides to the Mesopotamian Textual Record, 1) (Münster, 2005), p.
    [Show full text]