Mass Occurrence of Snake Pipefish: Result of a Change in Climate? ICES
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ICES CM2006/C:17 Mass occurrence of snake pipefish: result of a change in climate? Cindy J.G. van Damme & A.S. (Bram) Couperus IMARES, P.O. Box 68, 1970 AB IJmuiden, the Netherlands Abstract In 2004 a sudden mass occurrence of snake pipefish Entelurus aequoreus appeared in the North-eastern Atlantic and has been increasing since. Before 2004 snake pipefish was mainly found in coastal areas and occasionally in oceanic waters. Indices (numbers of fish caught per hour) from inshore surveys remain at the same level, while the indices from surveys conducted in deeper offshore areas show a very strong increase since 2004. The length distributions of all surveys differ significantly from each other. Coastal snake pipefishes are larger compared to pelagic specimens. Although the outward appearance of the coastal pipefishes seems different from the pelagic specimens, no differences were found when comparing taxonomic features. The mean numbers of rings and fin rays are well within the ranges mentioned for snake pipefish. Apart from appearance the habitat is different for the two types of snake pipefish. The oceanic form lives free in the water column while the coastal form is found among sea weeds or in sea grass beds. Although food is available in high quantities, the oceanic specimens of snake pipefish are much leaner than the coastal specimens. While the snout length would make the species more suitable for preying on less mobile prey, the stomach contents of the oceanic snake pipefishes revealed remains of relatively small calanoids (mean length 2.4 mm). The calanoid population has recently changed and is nowadays dominated by the smaller Calanus helgolandicus. Here we put forward the hypothesis that the sudden appearance of the snake pipefish in the deeper waters is a result of the change in the average lengths of calanoids which in turn is caused by changes in the hydroclimatic environment. The mass occurrence of the snake pipefish is affecting the whole ecosystem. Seabirds are feeding their chicks with them and they are also found in stomachs of fish and sea mammals. Keywords: snake pipefish, Entelurus aequoreus, climatic change, distribution, Atlantic Contact author: Cindy van Damme: IMARES, P.O. Box 68, 1970 AB IJmuiden, the Netherlands [tel: +31 255 564716, fax: +31 255 564644, e-mail: [email protected]]. Introduction Pipefish (Syngnathidae) are marine fish that mostly inhabit inshore waters (Dawson 1986). The snake pipefish (Entelurus aequoreus) is a species that can be found both in- and offshore and in oceanic waters, though a review of the literature shows that there is some doubt whether it is an in- or offshore species. At the end of the nineteenth and beginning of the twentieth century snake pipefish is mostly described as an offshore fish found in deep Atlantic waters (Couch 1877; Holt and Byrne 1904; Holt and Byrne 1906). Couch (1877) 1 ICES CM2006/C:17 even gives ‘ocean pipefish’ as a synonym for Entelurus aequoreus. Some authors state that there are two types of Entelurus; the larger oceanic and the smaller coastal form (Fries et al. 1895; Duncker 1915).Others even describe them as two separate species; E. aequoreus that can be found in offshore and oceanic waters and E. anguineus which is found inshore (Yarrel 1839; Moreau 1881). For some authors snake pipefish is an inshore fish (Day 1884; Ehrenbaum 1909; Poll 1947). In more recent fish guides snake pipefish is described as a species that can be found in deeper coastal waters amongst large seaweeds (Wheeler 1969; Nijssen and De Groot 1980; Dawson 1986; Muus et al. 1999) and most refer to the above references for the oceanic occurrence. This is because in the second half of the last century only captures of snake pipefish in coastal waters have been reported (Minchin and Molloy 1976; Briggs and McCurdy 1978; Andrews and Wheeler 1985). Since 2004 high numbers of oceanic snake pipefish have been reported from pelagic cruises and these have been rising ever since. In this paper we put forward the hypothesis that the sudden appearance and mass occurrence of the snake pipefish in deeper oceanic waters is a result of the change in the calanoid population which in turn is caused by changes in the hydroclimatic environment. Methods Data on snake pipefish from international pelagic and demersal Atlantic and North Sea surveys, International Bottom Trawl Survey (IBTS), Sole Net Survey (SNS), Demersal Fish Survey (DFS), Herring Acoustic Survey (HERAS; Dutch participation), Blue Whiting Survey (BWHTS; Dutch participation: from 2004 onwards) and Atlanto-Scandian Herring Survey (ASH; European participation: from 2004 onwards), are used for the calculation of numbers present and length-frequency distributions. BWHTS and ASH are pelagic surveys carried out in the deeper waters of the North-eastern Atlantic in winter and spring, while HERAS is a pelagic survey carried out in the deeper waters of the North Sea in summer. IBTS is a demersal North Sea survey from which we only used the data from quarter 1, while SNS and DFS are bottom trawl autumn surveys in the North Sea coastal zone. Since 2004 snake pipefish have been collected for analyses during these surveys. Snake pipefish, were counted and total length of each individual fish and total weight of all snake pipefish were measured. Pipefish were either frozen for later analyses in the laboratory or stored in 4% formaldehyde solution for stomach content analyses. Parameters measured in the laboratory were total length, total weight, head length, snout length (from tip of the snout to the vent), sex, trunk rings, tail rings, subdorsal rings (as described by Dawson (1986)), dorsal fin rays and whether a brood pouch was present or not. The gastro intestinal tract was dissected from the fish and cut open length ways. Since it was difficult to determine fullness of the stomach, it was recorded as filled or empty. When possible remains were identified to family level and length measured. Results The pelagic surveys are hydro acoustic single species surveys, targeting herring and blue whiting. As a consequence catch data of other species are not readily available. However in cruise reports from these surveys (unpublished data IMARES) it is reported that in 2004 snake pipefish suddenly appeared in the catches and in later years numbers increased. 2 ICES CM2006/C:17 Figure 1 shows the presence of snake pipefish in the three demersal surveys. In 1983, 1989 and 1999 low numbers of snake pipefish were recorded during the IBTS survey. Also in 2002 and 2003 snake pipefish were occasionally caught. Since 2004 numbers have been increasing, from 0.005 in 2003 to 5.1 pipefish per hour in 2006. In the coastal SNS and DFS surveys snake pipefish have always been present in small numbers (Fig. 1), and no increase is seen in the last three years. Figure 2 a-d show the length distributions of the different surveys. Length distributions of all surveys differ significantly from each other (P<0.0001). Comparison within the coastal surveys or demersal or pelagic survey shows also a significant difference in length distribution (P<0.0001). Mean lengths of the snake pipefish in the Atlantic BWHTS and ASH are smallest (Table 1). While snake pipefish caught in the coastal zone (SNS/DFS) are larger than those caught in the deeper North Sea (IBTS/HERAS). Numbers in the DFS and SNS survey are very low. For BWHTS and ASH surveys it was possible to compare length distributions of the last years. There is a significant (P< 0.0001) difference between the years, with the largest fish caught in 2006 (Table 2). Length distributions of BWHTS and ASH are clearly bimodal (Fig. 2c-d). The distribution of IBTS is also slightly bimodal but not as clear as in the two other surveys. During the HERAS survey snake pipefish were separated based on sex. Female snake pipefish are significantly (P<0.001) larger than males (Fig. 3a-b & Table 3). The bimodality in the BWHTS, ASH and IBTS is probably also due to differences in sex, rather than to different year classes. The appearance of the coastal and oceanic specimens of snake pipefish is different (Fig. 4). The oceanic form is much leaner and less brightly coloured compared tot the coastal form. The snake pipefish caught in the ocean are lean, almost only scales and bones, and look like they are starving. The coastal specimens are really fat, in that there is no lose skin and the coloration is really bright. The specimens caught in the deeper North Sea are intermediate between the oceanic and coastal appearance. They are not as lean as the oceanic ones, but do show loose skin and colouration is brighter than but not as bright as the coastal form. However when counting the rings on the body and dorsal fin rays of the pipefish no difference is found between the oceanic, intermediate and coastal specimens. And the mean numbers of rings and fin rays are well within the ranges mentioned for snake pipefish (Table 4). Also no differences are found in the ring and fin ray counts between both sexes. In both the coastal and pelagic specimens mature fish were found and males had brood pouches filled with eggs, suggesting this is one species Entelurus aequoreus with different appearance in different environments. The diet of snake pipefish proved difficult to assess. A few had empty stomachs. Most of the stomach contents were too far digested and impossible to identify (Table 5). What could be identified were remains of calanoid copepods, though it was not possible to identify these to species level. The mean length of these copepods was 2.4 mm (Table 5).