DOCSLIB.ORG

Unit 1 Lesson 3 Ohio's Early People

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Unit 1 Lesson 3 Ohio's Early People Unit 1 Lesson 3 Ohio’s Early People. Vocabulary • PEOPLE • What to Know: • Adapt • Paleo-Indians • How were the early people in • Archaic Indians • Ancestor Ohio affected by their • Artifact • Adena environment • Band • Hopewell • Fort Ancient Indians • Culture • • Mound • Nomad • Prehistoric A theory on how early people arrived: • During the ___________ ___________ , much of Earth’s ______________________ ______________________ and became trapped in ______________________ . • As a result, a “ ______________________ ” of ______________________ ______________________ appeared between Asia and what is now Alaska. • ______________________ ______________________ from Asia began to cross the land bridge. • These people were nomads, _______________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________. • They spent much of their time moving from ______________________ to ______________________ in ______________________ of ______________________. • The nomads who crossed the land bridge ______________________ ______________________ ______________________ of ______________________. • They hunted these animals for ______________________ and ______________________ . • Hides were animal skins that they used for ______________________, straps, etc. Map Skill: In which direction do we think early people travel from Asia to reach what is now Ohio?_________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ • Main Idea and Details: How did early people come to North America?_______________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ Prehistoric Indians of Ohio • We think that over ______________________ ______________________ ago, people reached what is ______________________ ______________________. • These early people had ___________ ___________ ______________________ ______________________ , and so they left no written records of how they lived. • We call this prehistory, and the _____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________as prehistoric people. The Paleo-Indians • The first people who lived in Ohio are called the _______________-___________________ . • They were nomads who ______________________ large animals for food. • The larger animals, like woolly mammoths died out. • People had to adapt, or ___________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ The Archaic Indians • After the last Ice Age, the ______________________ ______________________ lived in Ohio. • The Archaic Indians fished and hunted animals, including bison, white-tailed deer, and rabbits. • They also ate plants and gathered nuts and berries. • At first, the ______________________ ______________________ ______________________ as ______________________ . • Soon, they began to ______________________ in ______________________ • They ______________________ ______________________ ______________________ covered with bark or animal skins. • They also began to ______________________ ______________________ . They made tools: • ______________________ , from stone • ______________________ from flint, • With stone tools, they were able to make ______________________ , and ______________________ ______________________ . • Canoes helped them ______________________ ______________________ . • They ______________________ ( ______________________ ), with flint with other groups for seashells and copper. • Many groups of Archaic Indians developed ______________________ ______________________ . • They ______________________ and ______________________ ______________________ . • Each tribe, ________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ The Mound Builders • In the late 1800s, a farmer in Ohio found about 30 large mounds on his land. • Mounds ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________. • Scientists discovered many artifacts, or ______________________ ______________________ by ______________________ in the ______________________ , in the mounds. • The people who built mounds are called Mound Builders. • The earliest Mound Builders in Ohio were a part of the Woodland Indians. • The Woodland Indians thrived in Ohio about ______________________ ______________________ ago. • ______________________ and the ______________________ are mound building tribes. The Adena • Lived in ______________________ ______________________ . • Their ______________________ were the Archaic Indians. • They ______________________ ______________________ and ______________________ ; they also ______________________ , ______________________ , and gathered fruits. • The Adena made ______________________ . • The Adena buried ______________________ ______________________ when they died. • As ______________________ ______________________ were ______________________ , the ______________________ ______________________ . The Hopewell • ______________________ ______________________ the Adena culture. • Hopewell ______________________ were ______________________ . • They built them in ______________________ ______________________ , such as circles, squares, and octagons. • The Hopewell used their mounds for ______________________ ______________________ and for ______________________ ______________________. • The mounds were also used as ______________________ ______________________ . • The Hopewell ______________________ and ______________________ with people from all over. • They traded for ______________________ , ______________________ , and other items that they didn’t have in Ohio. • Their trade network stretched from the ______________________ ______________________ to the ______________________ ______________________ and south to the ______________________ of ______________________ . Fort Ancient Indians • The ______________________ ______________________ Indians lived in villages in southern Ohio about ______________________ years ago. • They were one of the ______________________ ______________________ of ______________________ people in Ohio. • They ______________________ more on ______________________ for most of ______________________ ______________________ . • Late Prehistoric Indians grew large crops of ______________________ , ______________________ , and ______________________ . • The Fort Ancient Indians also built mounds. • Some were ______________________ like ______________________ . • Probably the ___________ to use ______________________ and ______________________ to ______________________ . • Many scientists believe that ______________________ ______________________ , in Adams County, was built by the ______________________ ______________________ ______________________ . .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Newark Earthworks Center - Ohio State University and World Heritage - Ohio Executive Committee INDIANS and EARTHWORKS THROUGH the AGES “We Are All Related”
    Welcoming the Tribes Back to Their Ancestral Lands Marti L. Chaatsmith, Comanche/Choctaw Newark Earthworks Center - Ohio State University and World Heritage - Ohio Executive Committee INDIANS AND EARTHWORKS THROUGH THE AGES “We are all related” Mann 2009 “We are all related” Earthen architecture and mound building was evident throughout the eastern third of North America for millennia. Everyone who lived in the woodlands prior to Removal knew about earthworks, if they weren’t building them. The beautiful, enormous, geometric precision of the Hopewell earthworks were the culmination of the combined brilliance of cultures in the Eastern Woodlands across time and distance. Has this traditional indigenous knowledge persisted in the cultural traditions of contemporary American Indian cultures today? Mann 2009 Each dot represents Indigenous architecture and cultural sites, most built before 1491 Miamisburg Mound is the largest conical burial mound in the USA, built on top of a 100’ bluff, it had a circumference of 830’ People of the Adena Culture built it between 2,800 and 1,800 years ago. 6 Miamisburg, Ohio (Montgomery County) Picture: Copyright: Tom Law, Pangea-Productions. http://pangea-productions.net/ Items found in mounds and trade networks active 2,000 years ago. years 2,000 active networks trade and indicate vast travel Courtesy of CERHAS, Ancient Ohio Trail Inside the 50-acre Octagon at Sunrise 8 11/1/2018 Octagon Earthworks, Newark, OH Indigenous people planned, designed and built the Newark Earthworks (ca. 2000 BCE) to cover an area of 4 square miles (survey map created by Whittlesey, Squier, and Davis, 1837-47) Photo Courtesy of Dan Campbell 10 11/1/2018 Two professors recover tribal knowledge 2,000 years ago, Indigenous people developed specialized knowledge to construct the Octagon Earthworks to observe the complete moon cycle: 8 alignments over a period of 18 years and 219 days (18.6 years) “Geometry and Astronomy in Prehistoric Ohio” Ray Hively and Robert Horn, 1982 Archaeoastronomy (Supplement to Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • State Parks and Early Woodland Cultures
    State Parks and Early Woodland Cultures Key Objectives State Parks Featured Students will understand some basic information related to the ■ Mounds State Park www.in.gov/dnr/parklake/2977.htm Adena, Hopewell and early Woodland Indians, and their connec- ■ Falls of the Ohio State Park www.in.gov/dnr/parklake/2984.htm tions to Mounds and Falls of the Ohio state parks. The students will gain insight into the connection between the Adena culture and the Hopewell tradition, and learn how archaeologists have studied artifacts and mounds to understand these cultures. Activity: Standards: Benchmarks: Assessment Tasks: Key Concepts: Mounds Students will research what was import- Artifacts Identify and compare the major early cultures ant to the Adena Indians. The students Tribes Researching SS.4.1.1 that existed in the region that became Indiana will then compile a list of items found in Adena the Past before contact with Europeans. the Adena mounds and compare them to Hopewell items that we use today. Mississippians Identify and describe historic Native American Use computers in a cooperative group groups that lived in Indiana before the time of to create timelines of major events from SS.4.1.2 early European exploration, including ways that the era of the Adena to the rise of the the groups adapted to and interacted with the Hopewell Indians. physical environment. Use computers in a cooperative group Create and interpret timelines that show rela- to create timelines of major events from SS.4.1.15 tionships among people, events and movements the era of the Adena to the rise of the in the history of Indiana.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Earthworks Timeline
    OHIO EARTHWORKS TIMELINE THE GEOLOGICAL FORMATION OF THE of nuts, fruits, plants and edible roots. The OHIO VALLEY (2 MILLION TO 9000 BC) “Archaic” people began to plant seeds and tend Enormous glaciers helped reshape the Ohio Val- gardens, making eastern North America one of ley many thousands of years ago. The edge of the only a handful of places on earth where agricul- flat, glaciated region is prominent along a line ture began without outside influence. just west of Serpent Mound, Chillicothe, and Newark. After the last glacier retreated north- THE ADENA CULTURE (1500 BC TO AD ward, the new tributaries of the Ohio River, such 100) The first burial mounds in the Ohio Val- as the Scioto or the Great Miami, often followed ley mark new beliefs and customs. People still wide valleys created by the earlier, larger rivers. moved periodically, but they began to make These valleys have rich soil, laid over the sand pottery and erect thousands of great earthen and gravel till left behind by the glaciers, and burial structures around the Ohio and its trib- wide terraces at different levels that later became utaries, showing a strong sense of community. prime locations for earthworks. Archaeologists named this culture “Adena” after Thomas Worthington’s Chillicothe estate, PALEOINDIANS IN THE GREAT VALLEY where a mound excavation in 1906 revealed its (13000 TO 8000 BC) While glaciers still typical practices. The Adena produced beautiful covered much of North America, people first artifacts, and developed elaborations on mound arrived from Asia by the ancient land bridge architecture, including circular ditches, pave- to Alaska or by boat.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the Massachusetts Archaeological Society, Vol. 20, No
    BULLETIN OF THE MASSACI-IUSETTS ARCI-IAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY, INC. ~ VOL. xx NO.4 JULY, 1959 CONTENTS j Page ADENA AND BLOCK-END TUBES IN THE NORTHEAST By DouGLAS F. JORDAN 49 SOME INDIAN BURIALS FROM SOUTHEASTERN MASSACHUSElTS. PART 2-THE WAPANUCKET BURIALS By MAURICE ROBBINS 61 INDEX - VOLUME X 68 PUBUSHED BY THE MASSACHUsmS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY, INC. LEAMAN F. HALLE'IT, Editor, 31 West Street, Mansfield, Mass. MABEL A. ROBBINS, Secretary, Bronson Museum, 8 No. Main St., Attleboro, Mass. SOCIETY OFFICERS President Eugene C. Winter, Jr. 1st Vice President Viggo C. Petersen 2nd Vice President Arthur C. Lord Secretary Mabel A. Robbins Treasurer Arthur C. Staples Editor Leaman F. Hallett TRUSTEES Society OHicers and Past President Ex-Officio Robert D. Barnes 1956-1959 Guy Mellgren, Jr. 1956-1959 J. Alfred Mansfield 1957-1960 Waldo W. Horne 1957-1960 Theodore L Stoddard 1958-1961 William D. Brierly 1958-1961 COMMITTEE CHAIRMEN Research Council Douglas F. Jordan Council Chairmen- Site Survey, June Barnes; Historical Research, L. F. Hallett; at Large, G. Mellgren; Cousultants, J. O. Brew and D. S. Byers. Committee on Education Maurice Robbins Museum Director, Maurice Robbins Museum Curator, William S. Fowler Committee on Publications Leaman F. Hallett Chapter Expansion Willard C. Whiting Program Committee Walter Vosberg Nominating Committee Robert D. Barnes Committee on Resolutions Rachel Whiting Auditing Committee Edward Lally Librarian Clifford E. Kiefer CHAPTER CHAIRMEN Cohannet Chapter-Harold F. Nye W. K. Moorehead Chapter- Connecticut Valley Chapter- A. L Studley W. R. Young Northeastern Chapter-Robert Valyou W. Elmer Ekblaw Chapter- Sippican Chapter-L. P. Leonard Ie. B.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeologist Volume 33, No
    OHIO ARCHAEOLOGIST VOLUME 33, NO. 4 FALL 1983 The Archaeological Society of Ohio EXPIRES OFFICERS Robert Harter, 1961 Buttermilk Hill, Delaware, Ohio Associate Editor, Martha P. Otto. Ohio Historical Society, 1984 President Mike Kish, 39 Parkview Ave , Columbus. Ohio Westerville. Ohio 43081 Jeff Carskadden. 960 Eastward Circle, Colony North. 1984 Immediate Past President Frank Otto, 2200 E Powell Rd.. Zanesville. Ohio 43701 Westerville, Ohio 43081 1984 Vice President Don Gelbach, 3435 Sciotangy Dr , All articles, reviews and comments on the Ohio Archaeologist should be sent to the Editor. Memberships, requests for back Columbus, Ohio 43221 issues, changes of address, and other matter should be sent to 1984 Exec, Sect. Scott Haskins, 484 Stinchcomb Dr , the business office. Apt 23. Columbus, Ohio 43202 1984 Treasurer Jim Perry. 2668 Blendon Woods Blvd PLEASE NOTIFY BUSINESS OFFICE IMMEDIATELY OF AD­ Columbus, Ohio 43229 DRESS CHANGES. BY POSTAL REGULATIONS SOCIETY MAIL 1984 Rec. Sect. Chris Olenick, 8140 Anne St. S.W CANNOT BE FORWARDED. Navarre, Ohio 44662 1986 Editor Robert N. Converse, 199 Converse Dr , Editorial Office Plain City. Ohio 43064 199 Converse Drive, Plain City, Ohio 43064 TRUSTEES 1984 Alva McGraw, 1177 Eastern Ave., Chillicothe, Ohio 45601 BUS. MANAGER 1984 Jan Sorgengrei, Route 1, Pandora, Ohio 45877 Worthington, Ohio 43085 1984 Ernest G. Good, 3402 Civic Place, Grove City, Ohio 43123 1984 Donald A. Casto, 138 Ann Ct . Lancaster, Ohio 43130 Membership and Dues 1986 Dana L Baker, 1 7240 Twp. Rd. 206. Mt Victory, Ohio Annual dues to the Archaeological Society of Ohio are payable 43340 on the first of January as follows: Regular membership $12.00; 1986 Steve Balazs, 1010 N Mulberry St., Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Along the Ohio Trail
    Along The Ohio Trail A Short History of Ohio Lands Dear Ohioan, Meet Simon, your trail guide through Ohio’s history! As the 17th state in the Union, Ohio has a unique history that I hope you will find interesting and worth exploring. As you read Along the Ohio Trail, you will learn about Ohio’s geography, what the first Ohioan’s were like, how Ohio was discovered, and other fun facts that made Ohio the place you call home. Enjoy the adventure in learning more about our great state! Sincerely, Keith Faber Ohio Auditor of State Along the Ohio Trail Table of Contents page Ohio Geography . .1 Prehistoric Ohio . .8 Native Americans, Explorers, and Traders . .17 Ohio Land Claims 1770-1785 . .27 The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 . .37 Settling the Ohio Lands 1787-1800 . .42 Ohio Statehood 1800-1812 . .61 Ohio and the Nation 1800-1900 . .73 Ohio’s Lands Today . .81 The Origin of Ohio’s County Names . .82 Bibliography . .85 Glossary . .86 Additional Reading . .88 Did you know that Ohio is Hi! I’m Simon and almost the same distance I’ll be your trail across as it is up and down guide as we learn (about 200 miles)? Our about the land we call Ohio. state is shaped in an unusual way. Some people think it looks like a flag waving in the wind. Others say it looks like a heart. The shape is mostly caused by the Ohio River on the east and south and Lake Erie in the north. It is the 35th largest state in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Serpent Mound
    SERPENT MOUND Learning Objectives Lesson Overview Students will learn about the late prehistoric Students will Indians and their cultural practices by studying the Watch video on the Serpent Mound Fort Ancient Indian culture and the giant earthwork Examine images of Fort Ancient artifacts Create a “mock” cover and articles for Serpent Mound. National Geographic magazine Write an acrostic poem about the Serpent Mound Teacher Background a date of 1070 A.D. for its construction. Today, the site is on the National Register of Historic Places and The term Fort Ancient refers to a Native American has been nominated to become a UNESCO World culture that thrived between 1000-1650 A.D. in what Heritage Site. is now modern day southern Ohio and northern Kentucky. The culture was named after the site As with the Adena culture, mounds were often used “Fort Ancient,” a large settlement with extensive for burials. Though the Fort Ancient people were a mounded earthworks located in southwestern Ohio, moundbuilding culture, the mounds constructed by although these mounds are now believed to have the Fort Ancient did not serve a funerary function, been created by the Hopewell people. In fact, the nor was the Serpent Mound used for burials. Since Fort Ancient people were mound builders thought the Fort Ancient people left no written records, the to be descended from the Hopewell Culture. Today, function of the mound can never truly be confirmed. scholars believe the Fort Ancient Indians are the There are, however, several popular theories that likely ancestors of the Shawnee Indians. suggest that this colossal earthwork was used as a solar calender with different points along the curves The Fort Ancient people were Ohio’s first farmers of the serpent aligned to the seasonal solstices.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Program + Abstracts
    SUMMARY SCHEDULE MORNING AFTERNOON EVENING Fort Ancient Roundtable Opening Session OHS Reception 8–12 (Marion Rm) Ohio Earthworks, 1–4 Exhibit: Following (Delaware Rm) in Ancient Exhibits Footsteps , 5–7 THURS 12–5 (Morrow Rm) (shuttles begin at 4 at North Entrance) Exhibits Exhibits Student/Professional 8–12 (Morrow Rm) 12–5 (Morrow Rm) Mixer Symposia and Papers Symposia and Papers 5–9 (Barley’s Earthen Enclosures, 8:15– Woodland-Mississippi Underground) 11:45 (Fairfield Rm) Valley, 1:30–3:30 Late Prehist. Oneota, 8:30– (Fairfield Rm) 10:30 (Knox Rm) Late Prehist. -Ohio Valley Historic, 8–11 am (Marion & Michigan, 1:30–5 Rm) (Knox Rm) Late Prehistoric, 10:45–12 Woodland Mounds & (Knox Rm) Earthworks, 1:30–4 Posters (Marion Rm) FRIDAY Midwestern Archaeology, 9– Late Woodland – Ohio 12 (Fayette Rm) Valley, Michigan & MAC Executive Board Meeting Ontario, 3:45-5:00 12–1:30 (Nationwide B Rm) (Fairfield Rm) Posters Midwestern Archaeology, 1:30–4:30 (Fayette Rm) Student Workshop Getting the Job, 4:15–5:30 (Marion Rm) Exhibits Exhibits Reception and Cash 8–12 (Morrow Rm) 12–5 (Morrow Rm) Bar Symposia and Papers Symposia and Papers 5:30–7 (Franklin Ohio Archaeology, 8–11:15 Woodland -Ohio Valley Rm) (Fairfield Rm) and Michigan, 1:30–4 Banquet and Speaker Paleoindian & Archaic, (Fairfield Rm) 7–9 (Franklin Rm) 8:15–10:00 (Knox Rm) RIHA Project, 1:30–3:30 CRM, 9–12 (Marion Rm) (Knox Rm) Aztalan Structure, 10:15– Late Prehistoric -Upper SATURDAY 11:45 (Knox Rm) Mississippi Valley, 1:30– Posters 3:30 (Marion Rm) Angel Mounds, 9–12 Posters (Fayette Rm) Fort Ancient (Guard Site), OAC Business Meeting 1:30–4:30 (Fayette Rm) 11:15–12 (Fairfield Rm) MAC Business Meeting 4:15–5:15 (Fairfield Rm) Hopewell Earthworks Bus Tour 8 am–4 pm (meet at North Entrance of the hotel) SUN ~ 2 ~ TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary Schedule ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Archaic and Early Woodland Research in the Ohio Country
    Otto FM:Layout 1 9/21/08 2:24 PM Page vii PREFACE Archaeology in the Ohio area, especially relating to societies who were re- sponsible for constructing earthen mounds, holds a significant place in the history of U.S. archaeology. Archaeological inquiry began with the study of those sacred earthen mounds initially built by indigenous societies some three thousand years ago. The American myth of an unknown, imaginary race of nonindigenous peoples responsible for building these dispersed conical mounds, particularly abundant in the middle Ohio Valley, spread with western expan- sion. It was not until Cyrus Thomas’s excavations of many of these mounds in the late nineteenth century that this myth was eventually dispelled, with credit rightfully given to indigenous peoples. A central question posed by the emergent profession of archaeology then became, who were these people? Excavation of the large conical Adena mound in Chillicothe, Ohio, by William Mills in 1901 yielded a richness of funerary ar- tifacts that initiated Adena studies. Continued excavations of earthen conical mounds over the next five decades added to the inventory of material traits that defined the Adena culture, presumed at the time to represent a single, unified tribe analogous to contemporary Native American tribes. These trait lists continued to grow as archaeology refined its chronological placement of cultures, establishing the “Early Woodland” culture as distinct from that of the “Late Archaic” period, which roughly subsumed the transition from no- madic to sedentary archaeological cultures. By the 1960s, archaeologists ac- cepted the Adena as a specific kind of Early Woodland society: a shamanistic, kin-based culture centered along the middle Ohio Valley but with influence— evidenced by their iconic burial mounds—elsewhere in the eastern portion of the continent.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Archaeologist Volume 51 No
    OHIO ARCHAEOLOGIST VOLUME 51 NO. 3 SUMMER 2001 PUBLISHED BY THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF OHIO God grants liberty only to those who love it, and are always ready to guard and defend it. Daniel Webster 1834 MEMBERSHIP AND DUES TERM Annual dues to the Archaeological Society of Ohio are payable on the first of EXPIRES A.S.O. OFFICERS January as follows: Regular membership $20.00; husband and wife (one copy 2002 President Walt Sperry, 30214 Fairmont Ave., Mt. Vernon, OH of publication) $21.00; Individual Life Membership $400. Husband and wife 43050 (740) 392-9774. Life Membership $600. Subscription to the Ohio Archaeologist, published quarterly, is included in the membership dues. The Archaeological Society of 2002 Immediate Past President Carmel "Bud" Tackett, 905 Charleston Ohio is an incorporated non-profit organization. Pike, Chillicothe, OH 45601, (740) 772-5431. PUBLICATIONS AND BACK ISSUES 2002 Treasurer Gary Kapusta, 3294 Herriff Rd., Ravenna, OH 44266, (330) 296-2287. Publications and back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist: 2002 Executive Secretary Len Weidner, 13706 Robins Road, Ohio Flint Types, by Robert N. Converse $40.00 add $4.50 P-H Ohio Stone Tools, by Robert N. Converse $ 8.00 add $1.50 P-H Westerville, OH 43081 (740) 965-2868. Ohio Slate Types, by Robert N. Converse $15.00 add $1.50 P-H 2002 Editor Robert N. Converse, 199 Converse Drive, Plain City, The Glacial Kame Indians, by Robert N. Converse.$25.00 add $2.50 P-H OH 43064, (614)873-5471. 1980's & 1990's $ 6.00 add $1.50 P-H 1970's $ 8.00 add $1.50 P-H 2002 Recording Secretary Rocky Falleti, 5904 South Ave., 1960's $10.00 add $1.50 P-H Youngstown, OH 44512 (330) 788-1598.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Ancient Works
    Measuring Ancient Works Presented by Don Teter, PS ©2015 Donald L. Teter Measuring Ancient Works Cover page illustrations are a Scioto Valley burial mound and skull excavated therefrom by Squier and Davis “I can testify to little beyond the giant Mounds that the Savages say they guard as Curators, for some more distant Race of Builders. I have fail’d to observe more in them, than their most impressive Size, tho’ Mr. Dixon swears to Coded Inscriptions, Purposive Lamination, and Employment, unto the Present Day, by Agents Unknown of Powers Invisible.” Charles Mason, in Mason and Dixon, by Thomas Pynchon The Builders Adena (Early Woodland), Mississippian 1,000 BC – 200 BC 800 – 1600 AD Hopewell Fort Ancient 200 BC – 500 AD 1000 AD – 1750 AD Late Woodland Monongahela 500 – 1000 AD 1050 - 1635 Page 2 of 60 Measuring Ancient Works Page 3 of 60 Measuring Ancient Works Page 4 of 60 Measuring Ancient Works The Armstrong Culture is named for a creek in Fayette County, their mounds are smaller and less complex than the Adena. During the same period the Wilhelm Culture, named for a mound in Brooke County, was prevalent in the northern Panhandle and nearby areas in Pennsylvania. Page 5 of 60 Measuring Ancient Works Hopewell variants replaced the Armstrong and Wilhelm Cultures. The Armstrong seems to have evolved into the Buck Garden, named for a creek in Nicholas County. They used stone burial mounds and rock overhangs for their dead. The Watson Farm Culture, named for a mound in Hancock County, lived in the northern part of West Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Was Yankeetown an Angel Mounds Progenitor?
    Was Yankeetown an Angel Mounds Progenitor? A thesis submitted to the Division of Graduate Studies and Advanced Research of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Anthropology of the McMicken College of Arts and Sciences 2012 by Phoebe G. Pritchett B. Arts, Indiana University, 2011 Committee: Kenneth B. Tankersley (Chair) Heather Norton Abstract A significant and lingering question in Ohio Valley archaeology is the genetic ancestry and cultural origin of Mississippian peoples. Most archaeologists assume that Mississippian peoples migrated into the Mississippi River valley from an undefined cultural homeland. A plethora of recent archaeological data, however, challenges the cultural homeland hypothesis. An alternative hypothesis suggests that Mississippian culture developed from a pre-existing in situ population in the Ohio River valley, such as Yankeetown. Evidence in support of this hypothesis is the appearance of Mississippian-like artifacts and features that predate developed Mississippian populations. Presently, these diametrically opposed hypotheses remain untested. The development of Mississippian sites seems to happen simultaneously over a large area with a multitude of potential causes. Migration may have played a role in some areas, but not everywhere. Mississippianization of the area may be a result of a combination of human population growth, changes in subsistence strategy, and/or sociopolitical organization. The Yankeetown site, which dates from ca. A.D. 700 to A.D. 1100, has been defined as both a Late Woodland and Emergent Mississippian site depending upon cultural traits and inferred subsistence strategy. It is located in Warren County, Indiana, less than ten miles from the Mississippian Angel Mounds site located in adjacent Vanderburgh County, Indiana.
    [Show full text]