Small Steps Forward

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Small Steps Forward SMALL STEPS FORWARD Environmental Protection Report 2015/2016 VOLUME ONE: ENVIRONMENTAL RIGHTS The people of Ontario recognize the inherent value of the natural environment. The people of Ontario have a right to a healthful environment. The people of Ontario have as a common goal the protection, conservation and restoration of the natural environment for the benefit of present and future generations. While the government has the primary responsibility for achieving this goal, the people should have means to ensure that it is achieved in an effective, timely, open and fair manner. Preamble to Ontario’s Environmental Bill of Rights, 1993 October 2016 The Honourable Dave Levac Speaker of the Legislative Assembly of Ontario Room 180, Legislative Building Legislative Assembly of Ontario Queen’s Park Province of Ontario Dear Speaker: In accordance with Section 58(1) of the Environmental Bill of Rights, 1993, I am pleased to present the 2015/2016 Environmental Protection Report of the Environmental Commissioner of Ontario for your submission to the Legislative Assembly of Ontario. This year’s report is presented in two volumes. Sincerely, Dianne Saxe Environmental Commissioner of Ontario Annual Report 2015/2016 1 Table of Contents Commissioner’s Message 4 Executive Summary 6 1. Ministry Compliance with the EBR 18 2. EBR Applications 46 3. Use of the EBR’s Legal Tools 82 4. The ECO at Work 96 5. Recommendations 108 Environmental Protection Report 2015/2016: Volume 1 3 The Ministry of the Environment and Climate Commissioner’s Change (MOECC) makes the largest number of Message environmentally significant decisions and should set a good example in respecting environmental As your Environmental Commissioner, I am the rights. The ECO is glad to see that the MOECC guardian of the Environmental Bill of Rights (EBR), has, at last, begun posting public progress and I report to the Ontario Legislature, and to the updates on its outstanding applications for public, on energy conservation, climate change review. The MOECC has also begun a long- and environmental protection. This report focuses overdue review of the Environmental Bill of Rights on two questions: itself. These initiatives are important and appreciated. However, much remains to be done: 1. Do the environmental rights of Ontarians get enough respect? (Volume 1) and 1. The Environmental Registry, Ontarians’ 2. How well is the Ministry of Natural Resources window on significant government environ- and Forestry (MNRF) conserving biodiversity mental decisions, is hobbled by obsolete in its most recent initiatives? (Volume 2) software and often frustrates public partic- ipation. A fix to the software seems to be at Environmental Rights least a year away. The environmental rights of Ontarians need more 2. The MOECC is still responsible for more respect. than 400 outdated Environmental Regis- try proposals, depriving Ontarians of their There has been meaningful progress since I legal right to seek leave to appeal on many was appointed Commissioner in December controversial and important environmental 2015. As we showed in our Special Report decisions. EBR Performance Checkup: Respect for Ontario 3. The MOECC has not completed EBR reviews Environmental Rights 2015/2016, Ontario from as far back as 2009, leaving Ontario government ministries worked hard this year to residents hanging and important policy issues improve their compliance with the EBR. unresolved. One relates to the shameful im- pact of Sarnia air pollution on the health of This was welcome and overdue. In 2015, ministries the First Nations community of Aamjiwnaang had 1,800 outdated proposal notices on the and other similar air pollution hotspots. Environmental Registry reaching as far back as 4. When the MOECC “completes” a review, it 1996. By the summer of 2016, more than 1,000 does not always deliver what it promised. For of these outdated notices had been brought up to example, the MOECC agreed in July 2015 date. New notices from some ministries became that the public deserves to know when raw of better quality and more helpful to the public. We sewage is dumped into Toronto’s harbour. It welcomed the Treasury Board Secretariat as our happened again in August 2016, but the pub- 15th prescribed ministry. lic still didn’t receive notice. 4 Environmental Commissioner of Ontario By next year’s report, the MOECC should earn The impact was substantial: Ontarians’ trust by respecting and protecting Ontarians’ environmental rights. 1. Invasive species continued to be a serious threat while some practical and inexpensive The MNRF and Biodiversity precautions were ignored; The MNRF is responsible for almost all of 2. Years of fire suppression impaired the eco- Ontario’s biodiversity, including the plants, logical health of our forests and increased animals and natural landscapes for which we are the risk of catastrophic fires; and famous around the world. This biodiversity will 3. Important wildlife populations, like moose, come under increasing threat as climate change bats and amphibians, declined. accelerates. The MNRF has important new tools this year to conserve our biodiversity: a new The MNRF, like other ministries, struggles to fulfil Invasive Species Act, 2015, a new Wildland Fire its many mandates within the constraints of limited Management Strategy, and new moose management resources, and amid the demands of many stake- measures for this iconic but declining species. holders. But the MNRF can, and must, take its These are good steps in the right direction. biodiversity duties more seriously. It has new tools. Will it use them well? Message Commissioner’s But will MNRF “walk the talk”? Staff Who Go Above and Beyond Unfortunately, we see evidence of the govern- The ECO is impressed by the passion, commitment ment failing to use its tools to provide effective and expertise of many government staff who conservation for Ontario’s species. We have seen devote themselves to Ontario’s environmental instances where the MNRF: well-being, despite obstacles and constraints. With our annual ECO Recognition Award, we are 1. Did what was easiest and cheapest, instead delighted to recognize the initiative of two groups of what works; of civil servants who set outstanding examples 2. Hoped for the best instead of collecting the of environmental commitment and achievement data that are essential for effective species last year. Congratulations to them and to all protection; and the nominees. 3. Relied on others to do the work it should, or used to do, without providing leadership, coordination, funding or accountability. Environmental Protection Report 2015/2016: Volume 1 5 There has been meaningful Executive Summary progress since I was appointed Commissioner. As your Environmental Commissioner, I am the guardian of the Environmental Bill of Rights (EBR), This was welcome and overdue. In 2015, ministries and I report to the Ontario Legislature, and to the had 1,800 outdated proposal notices on the public, on energy conservation, climate change Environmental Registry reaching as far back as and environmental protection. This report focuses 1996. By the summer of 2016, more than 1,000 on two questions: of these outdated notices had been brought up to date. New notices from some ministries became 1. Do the environmental rights of Ontarians of better quality and more helpful to the public. We get enough respect? (Volume 1); and welcomed the Treasury Board Secretariat as our 2. How well do recent Ministry of Natural 15th prescribed ministry. Resources and Forestry’s (MNRF) initiatives conserve biodiversity? (Volume 2) The Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) makes the largest number of Environmental Rights environmentally significant decisions and should The environmental rights of Ontarians need more set a good example in respecting environmental respect. rights. The ECO is glad to see that the MOECC has, at last, begun posting public progress There has been meaningful progress since I updates on its outstanding applications for review. was appointed Commissioner in December The MOECC has also begun a long-overdue review 2015. As we showed in our Special Report EBR of the Environmental Bill of Rights itself. These Performance Checkup: Respect for Ontario initiatives are important and appreciated. Environmental Rights 2015/2016, Ontario government ministries worked hard this year to improve their compliance with the EBR. Prescribed Quality of Notices Timeliness of Handling of Considering Co-operation Ministry Posted on the Decision Notices Applications for Statements of With ECO Environmental and Avoiding Review and Environmental Requests Registry Outdated Investigation Values (SEVs) Proposals MOECC MNRF Excerpt from ECO Special Report, EBR Performance Checkup: Respect for Ontario Environmental Rights 2015/2016 6 Environmental Commissioner of Ontario The MOECC should earn Ontarians’ trust by respecting and protecting Ontarians’ environmental rights. However, much remains to be done: The MNRF and Biodiversity The MNRF is responsible for almost all of Ontario’s 1. The Environmental Registry, Ontarians’ window biodiversity, including the plants, animals and natural on significant government environmental landscapes for which we are famous around the decisions, is hobbled by obsolete software world. This biodiversity is coming under increasing and often frustrates public participation. threat as climate change accelerates. The MNRF 2. The MOECC is still responsible for more than has important new tools this year to conserve
Recommended publications
  • The Swallowswallow Volume 20, # 1 Autumn 2002
    TheThe SwallowSwallow Volume 20, # 1 Autumn 2002 Directors: President: Carey Purdon 625-2610 Jean Brereton Rob Cunningham Vice-President: Leo Boland 735-7117 Merv Fediuk Myron Loback Treasurer: Bernd Krueger 625-2879 Chris Michener Elizabeth Reeves Secretary: Manson Fleguel 735-7703 Benita Richardson Gwen Purdon Sandhill Cranes in Westmeath Provincial Park, photographed by Chris Michener on September 8, 2002. Membership in the Pembroke Area Field Naturalists is available by writing to: the PAFN, Box1242, Pembroke, ON K8A 6Y6. 2002/2003 dues are: Student $5, Senior $5, Individual $7, Family $10, Individual Life $150, Family Life $200. Editor, The Swallow: Chris Michener, R.R.1, Golden Lake, ON K0J 1X0 - Submissions welcome! ph: (613) 625-2263; e-mail: [email protected] PAFN internet page: http://www.renc.igs.net/~cmichener/pafn.index.html e v e n t s Westmeath Dunes (2 walks) results and enjoy pizza courtesy of the Dates: Sunday, Sep. 29 at 8 AM., and Club. Field Participants are asked to con- Saturday, Oct.5 at 8 AM. tribute $3.00 for publishing costs in the Place: Both trips start from the munici- Audubon CBC yearly report. pal dock in the town of Westmeath. Com- ing from the west on County Road 12, To view the Count circle map and turn left in Westmeath before the gas download forms, go to our web page. (see station at the blue building and continue cover for URL) Please contact Manson down to the water. Species sometimes to confirm participation, 613-732-7703 encountered are Nelson’s Sharp-tailed - email: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Progress Report of the Parties
    2019 PROGRESS REPORT OF THE PARTIES Pursuant to the 2012 Canada-United States Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement U.S. spelling is used throughout this report except when referring to Canadian titles. Units are provided in metric or U.S. customary units for activities occurring in Canada or the United States, respectively. Discussions of funding levels or costs in dollars is provided using Canadian dollars for activities occurring in Canada and U.S. dollars for activities occurring in the United States. Cat. No.: En164-53/2-2019E-PDF ISBN: 978-0-660-30888-3 II 2019 PROGESS REPORT OF THE PARTIES Table of Contents Executive Summary ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� iv Why the Great Lakes are Important ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������2 Articles �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������4 Areas of Concern Annex ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 10 Lakewide Management Annex ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 23 Chemicals of Mutual Concern Annex ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 38 Nutrients Annex �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • Hiking in Ontario Ulysses Travel Guides in of All Ontario’S Regions, with an Overview of Their Many Natural and Cultural Digital PDF Format Treasures
    Anytime, Anywhere in Hiking The most complete guide the World! with descriptions of some 400 trails in in Ontario 70 parks and conservation areas. In-depth coverage Hiking in Ontario in Hiking Ulysses Travel Guides in of all Ontario’s regions, with an overview of their many natural and cultural Digital PDF Format treasures. Practical information www.ulyssesguides.com from trail diffi culty ratings to trailheads and services, to enable you to carefully plan your hiking adventure. Handy trail lists including our favourite hikes, wheelchair accessible paths, trails with scenic views, historical journeys and animal lover walks. Clear maps and directions to keep you on the right track and help you get the most out of your walks. Take a hike... in Ontario! $ 24.95 CAD ISBN: 978-289464-827-8 This guide is also available in digital format (PDF). Travel better, enjoy more Extrait de la publication See the trail lists on p.287-288 A. Southern Ontario D. Eastern Ontario B. Greater Toronto and the Niagara Peninsula E. Northeastern Ontario Hiking in Ontario C. Central Ontario F. Northwestern Ontario Sudbury Sturgeon 0 150 300 km ntario Warren Falls North Bay Mattawa Rolphton NorthernSee Inset O 17 Whitefish 17 Deux l Lake Nipissing Callander Rivières rai Ottawa a T Deep River Trans Canad Espanola Killarney 69 Massey Waltham 6 Prov. Park 11 Petawawa QUÉBEC National Whitefish French River River 18 Falls Algonquin Campbell's Bay Gatineau North Channel Trail Port Loring Pembroke Plantagenet Little Current Provincial Park 17 Park Gore Bay Sundridge Shawville
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL EOMF Annual Report 2003-2004
    ACCOMPLISHMENTS 2003-2004 forests for seven generations The Eastern Ontario Model Forest is proud to present this annual report on Domtar Plainfield Opaque FSC-certified paper. Cover design by Tom D. Humphries, 2004. Table of Contents Message from the President — Meeting the Challenge 1 Report of the General Manager — A Good Way to Get Things Done 2 Our People in 2003-2004 — Board of Directors 4 Our People in 2003-2004 — Staff & Associates 6 A Budding List of Accomplishments — Project Preview 8 OBJECTIVE 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW — INCREASING THE QUALITY & HEALTH OF EXISTING WOODLANDS 9 1.0 Landowner Workshop Series 9 1.1 Landowner Education 9 1.2 Demonstration Forest Initiative 9 1.3 Web-enabled Forest Management Tool 10 1.4 Eastern Ontario Urban Forest Network (EOUFN) 12 1.5 Non-timber Revenue Opportunities 14 1.6 Timber Product Revenue Opportunities 14 1.7 Sustainable Forest Certification Initiative 14 1.8 Recognition Program 16 1.9 Science Management 17 1.10 Biodiversity Indicators for Woodland Owners 18 1.11 Sugar Maple & Climate Impacts 19 1.12 Mississippi River Management Plan for Water Power 20 1.13 Limerick Forest Long Range Plan & Trail Mapping 20 1.14 Cartography Initiatives of the Mapping & Information Group 21 OBJECTIVE 2: PROJECT OVERVIEW — INCREASING FOREST COVER ACROSS THE LANDSCAPE 22 2.0 Sustainable Forest Management in Local Government Plans 22 2.1 Desired Future Forest Condition Pilot Project 23 2.2 Strategic Planting Initiative 23 2.3 Ontario Power Generation Planting Database 23 2.4 Bog to Bog (B2B) Landscape Demonstration
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION 1.1 Description of the River 1.2 Project Structure 1.3
    INTRODUCTION 1 Chapter 1 Introduction The Ottawa River cradles the natural and cultural heart of eastern Ontario and western Quebec. Canada’s Aboriginal Peoples established their presence here some 6,000 years ago, followed by Europeans in pursuit of furs, timber, and land. From the area’s first inhabitants to the explorers, guides, traders, loggers, settlers, and entrepreneurs that followed, the Ottawa River was truly the original trans‐Canada highway. The Ottawa River played an integral role in many of the key stories that make up Canada’s history. It was the route for much of the early European exploration of North America, including Samuel de Champlain. Explorers in search of the Northwest Passage began their journeys along the Ottawa River. Other celebrated figures in Canadian history including Nicollet, Radisson, La Vérendrye, Dulhut and De Troyes, traveled west along the Ottawa River to establish trade relationships with First Nations communities, laying the groundwork for the fur trade. The fur trade relied on the famous waterway routes that began and ended with the Ottawa River. France’s North American colonial economy depended on the fur trade, which led to the development of the coureurs de bois and voyageurs era, and later to the creation of the North West and Hudson’s Bay Companies. Amid the profound social, political, and economic changes of the 17th century, the Ottawa River remained one of North America’s most important trading routes. It played a central role in the story of the fur trade in North America, and thus in the development of Canada. The rich forests along the Ottawa Waterway attracted thousands of European immigrants in search of work.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory of Environmental Organizations
    Directory of Environmental Organizations Rideau & Cataraqui Watersheds & Area Prepared by the Rideau Roundtable March, 2005 1 Directory of Environmental Organizations Cataraqui & Rideau Watersheds & Area Purpose The purpose of this Directory is to help community organizations and government agencies gain a better understanding of “who is doing what” in terms of environmental and stewardship programs throughout the Rideau and Cataraqui watersheds and area. Content There are 75 organizations listed in this Directory: 45 entries were gathered through a survey circulated by the Rideau Roundtable in 2004; 25 entries were drawn from a Stakeholder Analysis produced by St. Lawrence Islands National Park in 2002; the remaining 5 entries were drawn from a Shoreline Stewardship Directory produced by the Rideau Valley Conservation Authority in 2004. Errors and Omissions Every attempt has been made to ensure the information contained in this Directory is accurate. Please respond to [email protected] if you wish to make changes or corrections. Although the Directory lists 75 organizations, there are many others that are not listed and are doing great work to keep our watersheds healthy. Their absence from the Directory does not reflect the quality of their work. Financial Support The Rideau Roundtable wishes to thank the Ontario Trillium Foundation for providing funding to produce this Directory. In-Kind Support The Rideau Roundtable also wishes to thank St. Lawrence Islands National Park and the Rideau Valley Conservation Authority for sharing information listed in their own directories. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Click on page number at right to navigate document) Algonquin to Adirondack Conservation Initiative ............................................................. 6 Big Rideau Lake Association ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Longitudinal Profile of the Lower Ottawa River
    Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS i LIST OF FIGURES iii LIST OF MAPS iv RIVER NOMINATION 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 The Ottawa River Heritage Designation Initiative 3 1.1.1 Ottawa River Heritage Designat ion Commi t tee S tructure 3 1.1.2 Community Support and Involvement 4 1.1.3 Methodology 5 1.2 The Canadian Heritage Rivers System 5 1.3 Location and Description of the Ottawa River 6 1.4 Role of the Ottawa River in the Canadian Heritage Rivers System 6 CHAPTER 2 CULTURAL HERITAGE VALUES 14 2.1 Description of Cultural Heritage Values 14 2.1.1 Resource Harvesting 14 2.1.2 Water Transport 15 2.1.3 Riparian Settlement 18 2.1.4 Culture and Recreation 20 2.1.5 Jurisdictional Use 22 2.2 Assessment of Cultural Heritage Values 23 2.2.1 Se lection Guide lines: Cultura l V a lues 23 2.2.2 Integrity Guidelines: Cultural Integrity Values 24 CHAPTER 3 NATURAL HERITAGE VALUES 28 3.1 Description of Natural Heritage Values 28 3.1.1 Hydrology 28 3.1.2 Physiography 29 3.1.3 River Morphology 32 3.1.4 Biotic Environments 33 3.1.5 Vegetation 33 3.1.6 Fauna 34 3.2 Assessment of Natural Heritage Values 35 3.2.1 Se lection Guide l ines: Na tura l Heri t age Va lues 35 3.2.2 Integri ty Guide l ines: Na tura l Integri ty V a lues 36 CHAPTER 4 RECREATIONAL VALUES 38 4.1 Description of Recreational Values 38 4.1.1 Boating 38 4.1.2 Swimming 38 4.1.3 Fishing 39 4.1.4 Water Related Activities 39 4.1.5 Winter Activities 40 4.1.6 Natural Heritage Appreciation 40 4.1.7 Cultural Heritage Appreciation 40 Ottawa River Nomination Document i 4.2 Assessment of Recreational Values 41 4.2.1 Selection Guidelines: Recreational Va lues 41 4.2.2 Integrity Guidelines: Recreational Integrity Values 41 CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION 44 THE OTTAWA RIVER BY NIGHT (POEM BY MARGARET ATWOOD) 45 REFERENCES 46 APPENDICES 47 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Choices, Bad Choices
    Good Choices, Bad Choices. Environmental Rights and Environmental Protection in Ontario 2017 Environmental Protection Report The people of Ontario recognize the inherent value of the natural environment. The people of Ontario have a right to a healthful environment. The people of Ontario have as a common goal the protection, conservation and restoration of the natural environment for the benefit of present and future generations. While the government has the primary responsibility for achieving this goal, the people should have means to ensure that it is achieved in an effective, timely, open and fair manner. Preamble to Ontario’s Environmental Bill of Rights, 1993 Select citations have been included to help readers understand where the information the ECO cites comes from and to assist them in investigating an issue further should they be interested. Citations may be provided for: quotes; statistics; data points; and obscure or controversial information. Endnotes for these facts are generally only included if the source is not otherwise made clear in the body of the text and if the information cannot be easily verified. Exhaustive references are not provided. Ministries were provided the opportunity to provide comments on this report. Ministry comments are available on our website. October 2017 The Honourable Dave Levac Speaker of the Legislative Assembly of Ontario Room 180, Legislative Building Legislative Assembly of Ontario Queen’s Park Province of Ontario Dear Speaker: In accordance with Section 58 (1) of the Environmental Bill of Rights, 1993 (EBR), I am pleased to present the 2017 Environmental Protection Report of the Environmental Commissioner of Ontario for your submission to the Legislative Assembly of Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health Conditions in Ontario 2019 Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry September 22, 2020 Page 2 of 163 C 5 - CW Info
    September 22, 2020 Page 1 of 163 C 5 - CW Info Forest Health Conditions in Ontario 2019 Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry September 22, 2020 Page 2 of 163 C 5 - CW Info Forest Health Conditions in Ontario 2019 Compiled by: • Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Science and Research Branch © 2020, Queen’s Printer for Ontario Printed in Ontario, Canada Find the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry online at ontario.ca. For more information about forest health monitoring in Ontario visit ontario.ca/page/forest-health-conditions. Cette publication hautement spécialisée, Forest Health Conditions in Ontario 2019, n’est disponible qu’en anglais conformément au Règlement 671/92, selon lequel il n’est pas obligatoire de la traduire en vertu de la Loi sur les services en français. Pour obtenir des renseignements en français, veuillez communiquer avec le ministère des Richesses naturelles et des Forêts au [email protected]. Some of the information in this document may not be compatible with assistive technologies. If you need any of the information in an alternate format, please contact [email protected]. ISBN 978-1-4868-4585-9 (pdf) i September 22, 2020 Page 3 of 163 C 5 - CW Info Contents Contributors ..................................................................................................................... iii État de santé des forêts en 2019 ...................................................................................... iv Introduction ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2014-2015 Annual Report
    Ontario Invasive Plant Council Annual Report 2014-2015 Photo courtesy of Ken Towle Ontario Invasive Plant Council Annual Report 2014 - 2015 Annual Report 2014-15 1 Ontario Invasive Plant Council Annual Report 2014 - 2015 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 3 PARTNERSHIPS ................................................................................................................................ 4 OIPC COMMITTEES ......................................................................................................................... 5 Policy Committee ........................................................................................................................ 5 Communications Committee ...................................................................................................... 6 Research and Control Committee ............................................................................................... 6 Horticulture Outreach Collaborative .......................................................................................... 6 Fundraising Committee ............................................................................................................... 6 Website Committee .................................................................................................................... 7 Ontario Phragmites Working Group (OPWG) ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • OIPC Conference and AGM 2017 Details (October 10) 1:00 – 5:00
    OIPC Conference and AGM 2017 Canada 150 & OIPC 10: Success, Milestones and the Future of Invasive Plant Management in Ontario Agenda *note, this agenda is subject to change. Date: October 10-11 2017 Time: October 10 (field tours and evening social): 1:00 pm – 8:00 pm, October 11 (main conference): 7:00 am – 5:00 pm Location: Ottawa Event and Conference Centre, 200 Coventry Road, Ottawa, Ontario Time Details (October 10) 1:00 – 5:00 Field Tours, Ottawa Event and Conference Centre, 200 Coventry Road, Ottawa (pm) This year, there will be two field tours, consisting of the same site visits. For both tours, participants will all start at the same location, above. The group will then split and head to separate locations. Once finished at those locations, the groups will alternate. Therefore, both groups will experience the same tour, just at different times, in smaller groups. TIME: 1 pm to 5 pm LOCATION: Please meet at the Ottawa Event and Conference Centre, 200 Coventry Road, Ottawa, Ontario DETAILS: Two buses, alternating between three stops. 1. Macoun Marsh is a unique urban wetland located in the southeast section of Beachwood Cemetery and named after John Macoun, a pioneering Canadian naturalist. The marsh has received provincial, national, and international attention and has been used as a unique teaching tool about natural wonders, but now, invasives have begun to creep in and disrupt its teaching value. 2. Leitrim Wetland is located near the Findlay Creek Community within the urban boundary of the City of Ottawa. South Nation Conservation, in collaboration with other community partners, 1 helps to monitor and manage resources within this Provincially Significant Wetland.
    [Show full text]
  • Good-Choices-Bad-Choices-01.Pdf
    Good Choices, Bad Choices. Environmental Rights and Environmental Protection in Ontario Chapter 1 The Environmental Bill of Rights Contents 1.0 THE ENVIRONMENTAL BILL OF RIGHTS 16 1.1 THE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSIONER OF ONTARIO 17 1.1.1 EDUCATION AND OUTREACH BY THE ECO 17 1.2 STATEMENTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES 19 1.2.1 KEEPING THE EBR IN SYNC: THE TBS AND THE MOECC WILL CONSIDER CLIMATE CHANGE IN DECISION-MAKING 19 1.3 PUBLIC NOTICE AND CONSULTATION THROUGH THE ENVIRONMENTAL REGISTRY 20 1.3.1 POLICIES, ACTS AND REGULATIONS 22 1.3.2 PERMITS, LICENCES AND OTHER APPROVALS 22 1.3.3 INFORMATION NOTICES 23 1.3.4 EXCEPTION NOTICES 23 1.3.5 COMPLIANCE WITH EBR PUBLIC CONSULTATION REQUIREMENTS 23 1.3.6 OVERHAULING THE ENVIRONMENTAL REGISTRY 24 1.4 APPEALS, LAWSUITS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION 25 1.4.1 APPEALS OF CLASSIFIED INSTRUMENTS 25 1.4.2 LAWSUITS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION 27 14 Good Choices, Bad Choices. 2017 Environmental Protection Report THE ENVIRONMENTAL BILL OF RIGHTS 1.5 APPLICATIONS FOR INVESTIGATION 27 1.5.1 INVESTIGATION OF WASTE AT A FORMER SAWMILL 29 1.5.2 INVESTIGATION OF BATTERY STORAGE AT A RAILYARD 29 1.5.3 INVESTIGATION OF CONTAMINATION FROM A SEPTIC TANK 29 1.6 APPLICATIONS FOR REVIEW 30 1.6.1 REVIEW OF A STORMWATER APPROVAL 32 1.6.2 REVIEW OF THE WELLS REGULATION 32 1.6.3 REVIEW OF FRACKING REGULATIONS 33 1.6.4 REFORMING ONTARIO’S ENVIRONMENTAL BILL OF RIGHTS: PROMISES MADE, ACTION NEEDED 36 1.7 REVIEWING MINISTRY PERFORMANCE: EBR REPORT CARDS 38 1.7.1 SUMMARY OF EBR REPORT CARD RESULTS FOR 2016/2017 41 1.7.2 QUALITY
    [Show full text]