Legal-Graphics' 2-19-21 COVID Timeline
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Compendium of the Findings of the OPCAST Pandemic Subgroup 12
1 A Compendium of the Findings of the Obama PCAST Ad Hoc Subgroup on Pandemic Preparedness and Response December 23, 2020 Introduction A subset of the former members of President Obama’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (here OPCAST)—ten individuals who played particularly important roles in producing the six OPCAST reports between 2009 and 2016 that dealt with issues related to pandemic preparedness and response1—came together starting in March of this year to consider how insights from those studies might be combined with more recent research and current observations to develop suggestions about how the U.S. response to the COVID-19 pandemic could be improved. The Subgroup has produced six reports, addressing • the national strategic pandemic-response stockpile (May 20) • the role of contact tracing (June 18) • the role of public health data in controlling the spread of COVID-19 (July 28) • testing for the pathogen (August 18) • recommendations for the coming COVID-19 commission (September 21) • needs for improved epidemiological modeling (September 28) Each report was distributed, upon completion, to selected members of the Trump COVID-19 team and the Biden campaign staff, selected governors and members of Congress, selected public health experts outside government, and the media. The reports have also been posted on the OPCAST team’s website, http://opcast.org, together with a few opinion pieces based on them. In the current volume, we have assembled all six reports in full, preceded by a set of brief summaries. Four of the reports are followed by short updates taking account of developments since the reports first came out. -
Principais Vozes Da Ciência No Twitter
Principais vozes da ciência no Twitter: Mapeando a conversa de cientistas e especialistas sobre a COVID-19 UMA ANÁLISE DA REDE DE INTERAÇÕES NO TWITTER 1 O Science Pulse é uma ferramenta gratuita de social O Instituto Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Análise de Dados é um listening criada para preencher a lacuna entre jornalistas e centro independente de pesquisa e formação de analistas e cientistas. O objetivo é ajudar jornalistas a encontrar pesquisadores nas áreas de Pesquisa, Opinião Pública e conteúdos científicos que são tendência nas redes sociais e Comunicação Digital. a conhecer novos especialistas. O foco do Instituto é a aplicação e o ensino de técnicas e Com um algoritmo próprio, facilita a descoberta das metodologias de análise de dados com sólida formação publicações com maior popularidade dentro da comunidade científica para atuação no mercado. científica, das principais hashtags utilizadas e de perfis interessantes com menor engajamento. Conheça a nossa formação em Data Intelligence com curso exclusivo sobre Análise de Redes! O projeto foi criado pelo Volt Data Lab, agência do ICFJ Knight Fellow Sérgio Spagnuolo, e conta com apoio institucional da Agência Bori. 2 EXPEDIENTE Pesquisador Responsável Pedro Meirelles Coleta dos dados Science Pulse Tratamento dos dados IBPAD - Instituto Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Análise de Dados COMO CITAR? MEIRELLES, Pedro. Principais vozes da ciência no Twitter: Mapeando a conversa de cientistas e especialistas sobre a COVID-19. Relatório. Instituto Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Análise de Dados (IBPAD): Brasília, 2020. 3 METODOLOGIA A rede de interações foi desenvolvida a partir da base de dados do Science Pulse, que reuniu 213.469 publicações de cientistas, especialistas e organizações da comunidade científica sobre a SOBRE O RELATÓRIO COVID-19 entre junho e outubro de 2020. -
Emerging Leaders in Biosecurity Initiative
Emerging Leaders in Biosecurity Initiative Class of 2017 A competitive fellowship program created to identify, develop, and provide networking opportunities Yearbook for the next generation of leaders in biosecurity. Emerging Leaders in Biosecurity Initiative Contents Letter: 3 Thomas V. Inglesby, Director; Anita Cicero, Deputy Director, Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security Executive Steering Committee 5 Class of 2017 Fellows 9-35 ELBI 2017 Year in Review 36-37 ELBI Program Staff 41 ELBI Alumni 42 Cover and Inside Cover Photo Overlay: Swine Flu Strain Virus Particles. Col- orized transmission electron micrograph of negatively stained SW31 (swine strain) influenza virus particles. Credit: NIAID Emerging Leaders in Biosecurity Initiative The ELBI Fellowship program is made possible through financial support from the Open Philanthropy Project, under management by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, and with the leadership of the ELBI Executive Steering Committee. For more information, please visit the ELBI website: http://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/emergingbioleaders Center for Health Security “Modern conditions make the scenario of a global pandemic more likely. Humans are encroaching on animal environments, raising chances for pathogens to adapt from animals to people. An increasing share of the planet lives in megacities, heightening the likelihood of person-to-person transmission of pathogens. The movement of people and microbes around the globe is more efficient than ever. The recent outbreaks of SARS, MERS, and Ebola are only small glimpses of how quickly a deadly virus can spread.” Tom Inglesby and Benjamin Haas Foreign Affairs November 21, 2017 Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus particle envelope proteins immunolabeled with Rabbit HCoV-EMC/2012 primary antibody and Goat an- 1 ti-Rabbit 10 nm gold particles. -
National Covid-19 Testing & Tracing Action Plan
National Covid-19 Update Report Testing & Tracing Time to Redouble Our Efforts on Action Plan Covid-19 Testing Embargoed until 12:01am EDT, Thursday, July 16, 2020 THE ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION NATIONAL COVID-19 TESTING & TRACING ACTION PLAN 1 This terrifying tragedy was not and is not inevi- Foreword table. America can function safely, even as we fight Covid-19. Other countries have shown that a better alternative is possible. But as we said in America faces an impending disaster. April – when we first released The Rockefeller Foundation’s National Covid-19 Testing Action The extraordinary scale of the Plan – testing is the only way out of our present disaster, and it will remain the case until a vaccine Covid-19 crisis is evident in the or effective therapeutics are widely available. growing deaths and economic losses When we were barely a month into this pan- the pandemic has wrought in every demic, we brought together scientists, industry, technologists, economists, and Republicans state. Devastated minority and and Democrats alike to formulate an action plan low-income families bore the brunt of to expedite the development of our nation’s widespread testing and tracing system. We those costs. As the virus tore across called for rapidly expanded diagnostic test- ing capacity from 1 million tests per week to 3 the country, it exposed the structural million tests per week by June, and to 30 million inequities that have underpinned tests per week by October. Today we’re at 4.5 million tests per week, but unfortunately it’s and undermined our economy taking far too long to get to 30 million tests per week, and communities that most need them – for decades. -
Reentry Following COVID-19: Concerns for Singers
CARE OF THE PROFESSIONAL VOICE Robert T. Sataloff, Associate Editor Reentry Following COVID-19: Concerns for Singers David Meyer, John Nix, Lynn Helding, Allen Henderson, Tom Carroll, Jeremy Faust, Christine Petersen INTRODUCTION he target of this paper is captured in its subtitle: “Concerns for Singers.” While the COVID-19 pandemic has wreaked devas- tation upon disparate types of people around the world, singers, and those who teach and collaborate with them, are a vulnerable Tcohort within this larger global health crisis. This vulnerability is due to a David Meyer John Nix number of facts about the SARS-CoV-2 virus, beginning with its three main routes of transmission as outlined by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): (1) inhalation of very fine respiratory droplets and aerosol particles; (2) the deposition of virus-containing droplets and particles on exposed mucous membranes in the mouth, nose, or eye by direct splashes and sprays; and (3) touching mucous membranes with hands that have been soiled either directly by virus-containing respiratory fluids or indirectly by touching surfaces with virus on them.1 Lynn Helding Allen Henderson The CDC has further explained that “the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection varies according to the amount of virus to which a person is exposed” and notes that the two main variables concerning this amount are distance and time.2 Regarding the former, how far away an individual is from the respira- tory droplets of an infected person, combined with the observation that the concentration of the virus is diluted by both gravity (heavier drops fall) and mixture with air, illustrates why the CDC states that “the available evidence Tom Carroll Jeremy Faust continues to demonstrate that existing recommendations to prevent SARS- CoV-2 transmission remain effective. -
May 13 Federal Update
Congressional and Federal Agency Responses and Opportunities Regarding the COVID-19 Outbreak Lewis-Burke Associates LLC May 13, 2020 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Congressional and Federal Updates ............................................................................................................. 3 Update: Democrats Unveil Proposed $3 Trillion Response Package ........................................................ 3 Update: House, Senate Committees Hold Hearings on COVID-19 Response ........................................... 9 Federal Guidance Related to Research and Higher Education ................................................................... 10 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) ............................................................................................ 10 Update: Department of Education (ED) ................................................................................................. 12 National Institutes of HealtH (NIH) ......................................................................................................... 15 Department of HealtH and Human Services (HHS) ................................................................................. 16 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) .............................................................................. 16 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) .................................................................................................... -
IHP News 559 : “Public Enemy Number One”
IHP news 559 : “Public enemy number one” ( 14 February 2020) The weekly International Health Policies (IHP) newsletter is an initiative of the Health Policy unit at the Institute of Tropical Medicine in Antwerp, Belgium. Dear Colleagues, I know, I know, it’s Valentine today, so I probably shouldn’t talk about the eerily sounding “Covid- 19” in this short intro, let alone about the even more dreaded “P word” but WHO and dr. Tedros were clearly in no mood for Valentine earlier this week, when describing the virus as “a global threat, potentially worse than terrorism”. “The world must wake up and consider this enemy virus as public enemy number one,” Tedros said. With world media and public opinion going berserk all around the world for a few weeks now, I think that shouldn’t be too much of a problem. The other part of his message, however, that it’s about "solidarity, solidarity and solidarity", might prove much harder in the weeks and months to come, given how Sapiens is wired. When thinking of pandemics, in this visual culture of ours, we probably all have (subconsciously or not) a particular movie in mind when considering some of the most dire scenarios. For some of you, that might be “Contagion”, for me, it’s no doubt “Twelve Monkeys” (1995), with among others, Bruce Willis, a stunning Madeleine Stowe and a young Brad Pitt. Back in the innocent ‘90s, it all felt a bit surreal, even the obligatory rogue scientist popping up towards the end. But what a great movie! Now in the year 2020, with the scary ongoing public health experiment (aka ‘the coronavirus cruise ship quarantines’), occasionally I get the feeling that “Twelve Monkeys” is being mixed up with “the Poseidon Adventure” . -
BUGIARDERIA a Cura Di Jolanda Pietrobelli
1 2 BUGIARDERIA A cura di Jolanda Pietrobelli CristinAPietrobelli E-Book 3 BUGIARDERIA A CURA DI JOLANDA PIETROBELLI Copyright Cris Pietrobelli E-BOOK AGOSTO 2021 Copertina creazione di Silvia Cozzolino opera riprodotta <Anonjmo> Si fa divieto di riproduzione testi. Questa pubblicazione viene scaricata gratuitamente dal sito: www.libreriacristinapietrobelli.it 4 …dedicato alla vita 5 Il Cinese Il cinese, il virus, il <coso cinese>, sta dando filo da torcere a tutto il mondo. Gli scienziati all’opera sono diventati <divi in passerella> sempre presenti in TV a fare i propri proclami che non collimano tra loro, mettendo confusione e agitazione tra noi poveri bischeracci ignoranti, che non capiamo nulla, non dobbiamo capire nulla e dobbiamo fare ciò che loro dicono. Ma dicono così tante cose diverse! E non parliamo dei governanti che in qualche modo sono succubi dei presunti scienziati. Mi sono incuriosita, per natura non sono curiosa, semplicemente mi va di essere informata… in questo caso le informazioni son più che altro disinformazioni, ho pensato di prestare un po’ di orecchio a quegli scienziati allineati con nessuno a cui tentano di mettere il bavaglio, a cui non si dà più spazio in TV, per motivi impropri! Ho raccolto un po’ di materiale scomodo che magari una patina di verità ce l’ha però attenzione potrebbe essere <fake news> e lo propongo ugualmente…per dare una continuità alla confusione, ovvio. Sono solo spettatrice di uno spettacolo che non mi piace ma a cui assisto da quasi due anni. Non appartengo ad alcuna categoria:< complottisti – no vax e via discorrendo>, ma vorrei capirne di più. -
Corman-Drosten Review Report
Healthy Gallatin From: Owen Giddings <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 3:30 PM To: BOHPublicComment Subject: Vaccination rates Categories: NonAgendaPC Could the Health Board please speak in concrete terms to why Gallatin County is lagging significantly behind all of Montana's other large cities in vaccination rates, per the Montana Covid dashboard? First shots administered: as of 2/3: Missoula Count (Missoula): 12.9% vaccinated Lewis and Clark County (Helena): 14.4% vaccinated Yellowstone County (Billings): 14.6% vaccinated Cascade County (Great falls): 12.8% vaccinated Gallatin County: 8.1% vaccinated Silver Bow County (Butte): 17.7% vaccinated 1 Healthy Gallatin From: Administrator <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 1:29 PM To: BOHPublicComment Subject: mask mandate Categories: NonAgendaPC BOH members and staff, I continue to be dismayed at the lack of enforcement of the mask order in commercial establishment in Bozeman. The BOH inclusion of an exemption for medical reasons provides an illogical loophole big enough for the Queen Mary. Nobody with an actual respiratory health issue is going to be maskless out in public and run the risk of encountering some asymptomatic anti‐masker. Responsible businesses include an option for curbside service for those who don’t want to comply with the mask requirement. The choice to enter a business includes the responsibility to adhere to the safety policies of that business. Smoking or going naked are not tolerated by businesses, going maskless shouldn’t be either. Employees maybe exposed to scores or hundreds of customers each day. Gallatin County’s positivity rate all but insures that the typical service industry employee will encounter people who are infected. -
The Diocese of Southeast Florida's Reopening
On Being Faithful Guidelines for a Shared Discernment on the Way Ahead in this Season of COVID-19 But now thus says the Lord, he who created you, O Jacob, he who formed you, O Israel: Do not fear, for I have redeemed you; I have called you by name, you are mine. For I am the Lord your God, the Holy One of Israel, your Savior. Do not remember the former things, or consider the things of old. I am about to do a new thing; now it springs forth, do you not perceive it? I will make a way in the wilderness and rivers in the desert. [Isaiah 43:1,3,18-19] Preface Little did we know when the forty days of Lent began, that we would end the season in quarantine, either self-imposed, as if in a kind of strict Lenten fast, or enforced by guidelines promoted to protect public health and safety. From the forty (Latin: quaranta) days of Lent we have passed through the remembrance of Christ’s saving death and glorious resurrection into the fifty days of the Easter season, sure that Jesus Christ is risen, but still wondering when it might be safe for us to emerge from our own ‘tombs’ into the light of a new day. The new day has come, but we would do well to acknowledge that it is of a different kind and order, and one which no longer holds any certainty in this COVID-19 world. In this unwelcome season of the COVID-19 virus, we find ourselves living through a period of volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity, or, for short, a VUCA season. -
Written Testimony As
United States House of Representatives Committee on Science, Space and Technology Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight COVID-19 Variants and Evolving Research Needs May 12, 2021 Caitlin Rivers, PhD, MPH Senior Scholar, Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security Assistant Professor, Environmental Health and Engineering Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Current situation In the United States, we have entered a new phase of the pandemic. Nearly 60% of American adults have begun vaccination, including more than 80% of adults over age 65. Community transmission is declining, and I believe that by summer we will be able to resume most normal activities. However, in the last 14 months over 575,000 Americans have died and 32 million cases have been reported, with more likely unrecognized. Beyond the direct impacts, we have also endured severe economic consequences, disruption to education, strain on our healthcare systems, and we have missed time with loved ones. We have collectively suffered an enormous loss, and that grief will not be easily overcome. The toll of this pandemic is profound. The situation in some other countries is much worse, and the pandemic is far from over. Case counts are reaching new highs, with some recent days exceeding 800,000 reported cases and 13,000 deaths. India is in the midst of a terrible wave, and reports suggest that in some communities the situation is dire. A variant of interest, B.1.617, may be contributing to the surge. As our own domestic outbreak improves, we must turn our attention to helping the world. As we continue the work of ending the pandemic both at home and around the world, we must also identify the changes necessary to ensure we are never in this position again. -
Reentry Following COVID-19: Concerns for Singers
CARE OF THE PROFESSIONAL VOICE Robert T. Sataloff, Associate Editor Reentry Following COVID-19: Concerns for Singers David Meyer, John Nix, Lynn Helding, Allen Henderson, Tom Carroll, Jeremy Faust, Christine Petersen INTRODUCTION he target of this paper is captured in its subtitle: “Concerns for Singers.” While the COVID-19 pandemic has wreaked devas- tation upon disparate types of people around the world, singers, and those who teach and collaborate with them, are a vulnerable Tcohort within this larger global health crisis. This vulnerability is due to a David Meyer John Nix number of facts about the SARS-CoV-2 virus, beginning with its three main routes of transmission as outlined by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): (1) inhalation of very fine respiratory droplets and aerosol particles; (2) the deposition of virus-containing droplets and particles on exposed mucous membranes in the mouth, nose, or eye by direct splashes and sprays; and (3) touching mucous membranes with hands that have been soiled either directly by virus-containing respiratory fluids or indirectly by touching surfaces with virus on them.1 Lynn Helding Allen Henderson The CDC has further explained that “the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection varies according to the amount of virus to which a person is exposed” and notes that the two main variables concerning this amount are distance and time.2 Regarding the former, how far away an individual is from the respira- tory droplets of an infected person, combined with the observation that the concentration of the virus is diluted by both gravity (heavier drops fall) and mixture with air, illustrates why the CDC states that “the available evidence Tom Carroll Jeremy Faust continues to demonstrate that existing recommendations to prevent SARS- CoV-2 transmission remain effective.