DOCSLIB.ORG

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights Voting Record

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights Voting Record The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights Voting Record 116th Congress October 2020 Table of Contents 2 | Introduction 7 | About The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights Voting Record 9 | House Vote Summaries 21 | Senate Vote Summaries 39 | House Vote Charts 170 | Senate Vote Charts 1 Introduction We are in a moment of national crisis. The On the other side, the Senate majority ignored COVID-19 pandemic has taken the lives of that agenda in favor of stacking the courts hundreds of thousands of our neighbors, with mostly white, male, conservative judges. millions are out of work, and powerful calls for President Trump continued and deepened his racial justice echo in the streets. Black and pattern of racist, sexist, dangerous, and brown communities and people who are dysfunctional rhetoric and governance. And low-income in particular are suffering we faced the incalculable losses of champions disproportionately in a crisis that impacts in Rep. Elijah Cummings, D. Md., and Rep. every one of us. John Conyers, D. Mich., a legend in Rep. John Lewis, D. Ga., and an icon in Justice Ruth Many of our elected leaders have met this Bader Ginsburg. In this Congress, we found moment — crafting policy and legislation that hope and devastation; new energy and bitter would save lives, support families and loss. businesses, and address the demands of protestors — but all too many have not. First Session President Trump and his allies on Capitol Hill lied to the American people about the gravity The 116th Congress — with more women and of the threat posed by the virus, pushed people of color amongst its membership than millions of families into poverty, and stoked any previous Congress — ended one-party the fires of white supremacist hatred. These control of the government and ushered in a failures, whether based in malevolence or new sense of energy and possibility. incompetence, will forever stain the legacies Lawmakers’ first task was ending a of those involved. government shutdown fueled by the president’s demand that taxpayers fund This dichotomy — with one side of the Capitol construction of a senseless and destructive working to advance civil and human rights, wall on the border with Mexico. The president and the other doing everything it can to attack dropped his demand only after the shutdown them — was a theme throughout the 116th had dragged on for weeks, and impacted Congress, even before the pandemic began. millions of federal workers, their families, and In 2019, a new generation of members swept people who depend on federal programs for into the House of Representatives, making it their well-being. the most diverse in history. The House conducted much-needed oversight of the After working to end the shutdown, the House Trump administration and passed the boldest — under the leadership of Speaker Nancy civil rights agenda in a generation. Pelosi, D. Calif. — engaged in a wave of legislative activity and enacted an extensive civil and human rights agenda. 2 At the same time, House committee chairs Trump, McConnell, and Senate Judiciary took up their gavels and began to conduct Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, R. S.C., long-overdue oversight on Trump administration selected and rushed to confirm nominees who policies and actions after two years of neglect, had argued in favor of ripping health coverage evasion, or cover-up by administration allies in away from millions of people by claiming the the 115th Congress. Committees also conducted Affordable Care Act is unconstitutional, paved significant fact-finding hearings related to the way for large-scale voter purges, and called pending legislation and other civil and human being transgender a “delusion.” The clear rights issues. anti-civil rights records of these nominees, and dozens more like them, did nothing to dissuade The civil and human rights legislative agenda on the Senate majority from fast-tracking them the House floor and the robust oversight work through to confirmation. To the contrary, Trump undertaken in committee was a glimpse and his Senate allies seemed to view these of what is possible. The picture in the Senate, biases as a feature and not a fault. however, could not have been more different. To transform our courts, McConnell and Graham Rather than collaborate with their colleagues to changed the rules to rig the process in their favor. take up any of the important legislation passed Graham dismissed the historic role of home-state by the House, the Senate majority fixated their senators in the selection and confirmation of time on the rapid confirmation of anti-civil rights circuit court nominees. McConnell changed judges. While Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, Senate rules to drastically reduce the amount D. N.Y., and his caucus stood ready to advance of time dedicated for floor debate of district the civil and human rights agenda, Majority court nominees, to the point where a half a Leader Mitch McConnell, R. Ky., largely decided dozen lifetime appointments could be confirmed to leave those bills in his legislative graveyard. in a single day. This drumbeat of confirmations Instead, McConnell worked to stack the courts characterized the work of the Senate over the with young, conservative ideologues who have course of the year. demonstrated their hostility to civil and human rights. These appointees to lifetime judgeships will have the ability to carry out the Trump 3 3 agenda for decades to come. They even continued to process Trump judicial nominees while the president was on trial in their own chamber. When it came time to vote, the Senate majority ignored the evidence and prevented Congress from holding Trump accountable for his actions. Second Session In one of the greatest national emergencies in living memory, choices made in Congress impacted the lives and livelihoods of every single person in our nation. To the extent that communities have been able to support families and businesses, conduct elections, and keep people safe, it has often been because of congressional action in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. And the Impeachment choice by President Trump and his congressional allies to hinder additional aid The year 2019 ended with the impeachment of has pushed millions into poverty and put lives President Trump. The House uncovered in danger. undeniable evidence that the president sought The passage of early COVID-19 relief to use his office to extort and bribe a foreign measures, including the CARES Act, were government to target a political opponent for rare moments of bipartisan cooperation. his own personal gain. House Judiciary Provisions like extended unemployment Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D. N.Y., and insurance were crucial lifelines for Americans House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam who were out of work due to the pandemic. Schiff, D. Calif., led high-profile hearings that Along with the heroic efforts of ordinary brought witness after witness in front of the people, frontline workers, and mutual aid American people. And a significant majority of groups, these pieces of legislation supported House members took a principled vote to act entire communities. on that evidence, defend the rule of law, and hold the president accountable. But as the pandemic wore on and the death toll rose to previously unimaginable heights, Rather than take the evidence marshaled by Trump tired of the responsibility and the House process seriously, and put country attempted to gaslight and deflect his way out over party, the Senate majority began the of the crisis. Rather than encourage second session of the 116th Congress by common-sense public health measures, moving to protect the president, cover up his Trump politicized mask-wearing. Rather than litany of wrongdoing, and attempt to place him create a cohesive national strategy, Trump above the law. left states to compete with each other for essential supplies and demonized governors 4 who he deemed to be insufficiently supportive of him personally. Rather than provide additional support to McConnell refused to take it up in the Senate, families, businesses, and state and local and instead attempted to bring a governments needed to reopen safely, Trump watered-down alternative up for a vote. pushed for states to recklessly reopen and put lives at risk. Rather than address public health, the economy, or racial justice, Trump’s Once again, Trump’s congressional allies congressional allies supported his abdicated their responsibility to lead and administration’s attempts to use the cover of instead followed the president. On May 15, the pandemic to roll back civil and human 2020, the House passed the HEROES Act as a rights. Trump and his allies refused to follow up to the CARES Act — it would support adequately fund the U.S. Postal Service and health care, economic security, immigrants, interfered with its operations — slowing down students, housing, voting access, census delivery of the mail despite millions relying on participation, communications access, and the it for the delivery of prescriptions, mail-in justice system while combating structural ballots, and essential goods. With the support racism, xenophobia, and other barriers. of its friends on the Hill, the administration cut McConnell refused to take it up, as many of the off the 2020 Census, despite many CARES Act measures that had been supporting pandemic-induced delays and changes, after the economy expired one by one. spending years working to prevent a fair and accurate count. Yet, the House continued its work to pass an affirmative civil rights agenda, Just days after the passage of the HEROES Act, including a bill to end Trump’s bigoted Muslim George Floyd was killed by a police officer in ban and an historic vote for voting rights and Minneapolis, Minn., who knelt on Floyd’s neck equal citizenship through statehood for the for over 8 minutes as Floyd called out that he more than 700,000 residents of Washington, could not breathe.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ben Sasse & Deb Fischer
    NEBRASKA TAXPAYERS FOR FREEDOM: CONGRESS WATCH BULLETIN. THE VOTING RECORD OF YOUR SENATORS: 2019. 304 North 168 Cir. #213 11819 Miracle Hills Dr. #205 Omaha, NE. 68118 Omaha, NE. 68154 Phone: 402-550-8040 Phone: 402-391-3411 Fax: 402-391-4725 Sen. Ben Sasse Sen. Deb Fischer 116th CONGRESS – 2019 NTF voting scores during this session: FISCHER: 99% 1st Session SASSE: 95% Taxes. S.J. Res. 50: To disapprove a conservative IRS rule relating to charitable contributions and estate tax deductions when a taxpayer receives or expects to receive a corresponding state or local tax credit. BAD BILL/ FAILED Fischer: NO Sasse: NO Spending. HR 3055 Amend. 1019: To reduce amounts appropriated by 2% than amount appropriated in FY 2019 for several federal programs. GOOD AMENDMENT/ FAILED Fischer: YES Sasse: YES Amend. 1141: To prohibit a liberal test for mass transit expenditures. GOOD AMENDMENT/ PASSED Fischer: YES Sasse: YES Amend. 1250: To not reduce amount appropriated by 1% and put savings towards EPA infrastructure assistance. BAD AMENDMENT/ PASSED Fischer: NO Sasse: NO HR 3877: To amend the Balanced Budget Act of 1985 to suspend the federal debt limit. BAD BILL/ PASSED Fischer: NO Sasse: NO HR 4378 Amend. 942: To reduce appropriated amount by 2% for several federal agencies. GOOD AMENDMENT/ FAILED Fischer: YES Sasse: YES PN 150: To confirm Gordon Hartogensis as Director of Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation. GOOD RESOLUTION/ CONFIRMED Fisher: YES Sasse: YES Government Regulations. PN 22: To confirm Andrew Wheeler as EPA administrator. GOOD RESOLUTION/ CONFIRMED Fischer: YES Sasse: YES PN 47: To confirm Spencer Bacchus III as member of the Export-Import Bank of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Report Card
    Congressional Report Card NOTE FROM BRIAN DIXON Senior Vice President for Media POPULATION CONNECTION and Government Relations ACTION FUND 2120 L St NW, Suite 500 Washington, DC 20037 ou’ll notice that this year’s (202) 332–2200 Y Congressional Report Card (800) 767–1956 has a new format. We’ve grouped [email protected] legislators together based on their popconnectaction.org scores. In recent years, it became twitter.com/popconnect apparent that nearly everyone in facebook.com/popconnectaction Congress had either a 100 percent instagram.com/popconnectaction record, or a zero. That’s what you’ll popconnectaction.org/116thCongress see here, with a tiny number of U.S. Capitol switchboard: (202) 224-3121 exceptions in each house. Calling this number will allow you to We’ve also included information connect directly to the offices of your about some of the candidates senators and representative. that we’ve endorsed in this COVER CARTOON year’s election. It’s a small sample of the truly impressive people we’re Nick Anderson editorial cartoon used with supporting. You can find the entire list at popconnectaction.org/2020- the permission of Nick Anderson, the endorsements. Washington Post Writers Group, and the Cartoonist Group. All rights reserved. One of the candidates you’ll read about is Joe Biden, whom we endorsed prior to his naming Sen. Kamala Harris his running mate. They say that BOARD OF DIRECTORS the first important decision a president makes is choosing a vice president, Donna Crane (Secretary) and in his choice of Sen. Harris, Joe Biden struck gold. Carol Ann Kell (Treasurer) Robert K.
    [Show full text]
  • Steven Menashi President Trump Nominated Steven Menashi to Serve
    Steven Menashi President Trump nominated Steven Menashi to serve on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on August 14, 2019. Menashi is anti-choice. Career1 Bachelor of Arts, Dartmouth College, 2001 Assistant Editor, Policy Review, Hoover Institution, 2001-2002 Associate Editor, Policy Review, Hoover Institution, 2002-2004 Public Affairs Fellow, Hoover Institution, 2002-2004 Editorial Writer, The New York Sun, 2004-2005 Juris Doctorate, Stanford Law School, 2008 Clerk, Judge Douglas Ginsburg, U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 2008-2009 Olin-Searle Fellow, Georgetown University Law Center, 2009-2010 Clerk, Associate Justice Samuel Alito, U.S. Supreme Court, 2010-2011 Associate, Kirkland & Ellis, 2011-2013 Of Counsel, Kirkland & Ellis, 2013-2015, 2016-2017 Partner, Kirkland & Ellis, 2015-2016 Koch-Searle Research Fellow, New York University School of Law, 2013-2015 Assistant Professor, George Mason University Antonin Scalia Law School, 2016-2019 (on leave 2017-2019) Acting General Counsel, U.S. Department of Education, 2017-2018 Principal Deputy General Counsel, U.S. Department of Education, 2018 Special Assistant to the President/Associate Counsel, Office of White House Counsel, The White House, 2018-present Record on Reproductive Freedom Menashi submitted an amicus brief on behalf of former U.S. Department of Justice officials in Zubik v. Burwell arguing that the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive- coverage policy forced certain religious groups into “moral complicity” with the use of contraception, despite an accommodation put in place for such groups by the Obama administration.2 Menashi compared such groups’ “moral complicity” in the use of contraception to providing weapons to help someone commit a crime.3 As editor-in-chief of the Dartmouth Review, Menashi wrote several anti-choice articles and editorials.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapman Law Review
    Chapman Law Review Volume 21 Board of Editors 2017–2018 Executive Board Editor-in-Chief LAUREN K. FITZPATRICK Managing Editor RYAN W. COOPER Senior Articles Editors Production Editor SUNEETA H. ISRANI MARISSA N. HAMILTON TAYLOR A. KENDZIERSKI CLARE M. WERNET Senior Notes & Comments Editor TAYLOR B. BROWN Senior Symposium Editor CINDY PARK Senior Submissions & Online Editor ALBERTO WILCHES –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Articles Editors ASHLEY C. ANDERSON KRISTEN N. KOVACICH ARLENE GALARZA STEVEN L. RIMMER NATALIE M. GAONA AMANDA M. SHAUGHNESSY-FORD ANAM A. JAVED DAMION M. YOUNG __________________________________________________________________ Staff Editors RAYMOND AUBELE AMY N. HUDACK JAMIE L. RICE CARLOS BACIO MEGAN A. LEE JAMIE L. TRAXLER HOPE C. BLAIN DANTE P. LOGIE BRANDON R. SALVATIERRA GEORGE E. BRIETIGAM DRAKE A. MIRSCH HANNAH B. STETSON KATHERINE A. BURGESS MARLENA MLYNARSKA SYDNEY L. WEST KYLEY S. CHELWICK NICHOLE N. MOVASSAGHI Faculty Advisor CELESTINE MCCONVILLE, Professor of Law CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY HAZEM H. CHEHABI ADMINISTRATION JEROME W. CWIERTNIA DALE E. FOWLER ’58 DANIELE C. STRUPPA BARRY GOLDFARB President STAN HARRELSON GAVIN S. HERBERT,JR. GLENN M. PFEIFFER WILLIAM K. HOOD Provost and Executive Vice ANDY HOROWITZ President for Academic Affairs MARK CHAPIN JOHNSON ’05 JENNIFER L. KELLER HAROLD W. HEWITT,JR. THOMAS E. MALLOY Executive Vice President and Chief SEBASTIAN PAUL MUSCO Operating Officer RICHARD MUTH (MBA ’05) JAMES J. PETERSON SHERYL A. BOURGEOIS HARRY S. RINKER Executive Vice President for JAMES B. ROSZAK University Advancement THE HONORABLE LORETTA SANCHEZ ’82 HELEN NORRIS MOHINDAR S. SANDHU Vice President and Chief RONALD M. SIMON Information Officer RONALD E. SODERLING KAREN R. WILKINSON ’69 THOMAS C. PIECHOTA DAVID W.
    [Show full text]
  • Contempt of Courts? President Trump's
    CONTEMPT OF COURTS? PRESIDENT TRUMP’S TRANSFORMATION OF THE JUDICIARY Brendan Williams* Faced with a letter from the American Bar Association (ABA) assessing him as “arrogant, lazy, an ideologue, and lacking in knowledge of the day-to-day practice,” Lawrence VanDyke, nominated by President Trump to serve on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, cried during an October 2019 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.1 Republican senators dutifully attacked the ABA as liberally-biased.2 In a Wall Street Journal column, a defender of VanDyke assailed what he called a “smear campaign” and wrote that “[t]he ABA’s aggressive politicization is especially frustrating for someone like me, an active member of the ABA[.]”3 VanDyke was confirmed anyway.4 Contrary to Republican protestations, the ABA has deemed 97% of President Trump’s nominees to be “well qualified” or “qualified.”5 Indeed, in the most polarizing judicial nomination of the Trump Administration, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Kavanaugh’s defenders pointed to the ABA having rated him “well qualified” despite the association having once, in 2006, dropped his rating to “qualified” due to concerns about his temperament.6 *Attorney Brendan Williams is the author of over 30 law review articles, predominantly on civil rights and health care issues. A former Washington Supreme Court judicial clerk, Brendan is a New Hampshire long-term care advocate. This article is dedicated to his father Wayne Williams, admitted to the Washington bar in 1970. 1Hannah Knowles, Trump Judicial Nominee Cries over Scathing Letter from the American Bar Association, WASH. POST (Oct. 30, 2015). 2Id.
    [Show full text]
  • Patrick Wyrick
    AFJ NOMINEE REPORT patrick Wyrick U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma WWW. AFJ.ORG CONTENTS Introduction, 1 Biography, 2 environment, 3 reproductive rights, 6 workers’ Rights, 7 death penalty, 9 Tribal Issues, 9 gun safety, 10 religious bigotry, 10 voting rights, 10 Conclusion, 11 WWW.AFJ.ORG PAGE 1 reproductive health, helped dismantle protections for workers, defended a Introduction law that attempted to codify religious intolerance toward Muslims, and even On April 10, 2018, President Trump came under fire for allegedly nominated Oklahoma Supreme Court attempting to mislead the U.S. Justice Patrick Wyrick to the U.S. Supreme Court during his defense of District Court for the Western District Oklahoma’s death penalty protocol. of Oklahoma. If confirmed, Wyrick, Wyrick’s nomination is in keeping with who is just 37 years old and has the Trump Administration’s stated practiced law for just over ten years, goal of filling the federal bench with will replace Judge David Russell, who judges who are hostile to government assumed senior status on July 7, 2013.1 regulations that protect health and Patrick Wyrick is also on President safety, the environment, consumers Trump’s short list for the Supreme and workers, having once stated, “I Court. think we have all sorts of basic Despite his short legal career, Wyrick fundamental Constitutional problems has made a name for himself as a with the nature of the current 2 protégé of current Environmental administrative state.” Protection Agency (EPA) As the Senate Judiciary Committee Administrator Scott Pruitt, for whom reviews Wyrick’s controversial he worked during Pruitt’s tenure as positions and activities during Oklahoma Attorney General.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump Judges: Even More Extreme Than Reagan and Bush Judges
    Trump Judges: Even More Extreme Than Reagan and Bush Judges September 3, 2020 Executive Summary In June, President Donald Trump pledged to release a new short list of potential Supreme Court nominees by September 1, 2020, for his consideration should he be reelected in November. While Trump has not yet released such a list, it likely would include several people he has already picked for powerful lifetime seats on the federal courts of appeals. Trump appointees' records raise alarms about the extremism they would bring to the highest court in the United States – and the people he would put on the appellate bench if he is reelected to a second term. According to People For the American Way’s ongoing research, these judges (including those likely to be on Trump’s short list), have written or joined more than 100 opinions or dissents as of August 31 that are so far to the right that in nearly one out of every four cases we have reviewed, other Republican-appointed judges, including those on Trump’s previous Supreme Court short lists, have disagreed with them.1 Considering that every Republican president since Ronald Reagan has made a considerable effort to pick very conservative judges, the likelihood that Trump could elevate even more of his extreme judicial picks raises serious concerns. On issues including reproductive rights, voting rights, police violence, gun safety, consumer rights against corporations, and the environment, Trump judges have consistently sided with right-wing special interests over the American people – even measured against other Republican-appointed judges. Many of these cases concern majority rulings issued or joined by Trump judges.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record on Choice
    2019 Congressional Record on Choice Government Relations Department 1725 I Street, NW Suite 900 Washington, DC 20006 202.973.3000 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD ON CHOICE 116TH CONGRESS, 1ST SESSION NARAL Pro-Choice America’s 2019 Congressional Record on Choice documents the key House and Senate votes on reproduc- For over 50 years, NARAL Pro-Choice tive freedom taken during the first session of the 116th Congress. The 116th Congress reflects a wave of historic firsts—most America has led the fight for repro- significantly the first pro-choice majority in the House of Representatives. There are a record number of women serving ductive freedom for everyone, includ- in the House, and more LGBTQ people serving in Congress than ever before. The freshman class is also younger than most ing the right to access abortion. recent incoming classes and the 116th Congress reflects record breaking racial, ethnic, and religious diversity. Nowhere was the new pro-choice House majority more NARAL Pro-Choice America is powered evident than in the appropriations process. House spending bills for fiscal year 2020 reflected increased funding for vital by our 2.5 million members—in every family planning programs, defunded harmful abstinence-on- ly-until-marriage programs, and blocked many of the Trump administration’s efforts to use the regulatory process to state and congressional district. restrict access to abortion and family planning services. Though the House bills were not passed by the Senate, we We represent the more than 7 in 10 now see what can happen when lawmakers committed to reproductive rights are in control.
    [Show full text]
  • The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies 2009 Annual Report
    The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies 2009 Annual Report “The Courts must declare the sense of the law; and if they should be disposed to exercise will instead of JUDGMENT, the consequences would be the substitution of their pleasure for that of the legislative body.” The Federalist 78 THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY aw schools and the legal profession are currently strongly dominated by a L form of orthodox liberal ideology which advocates a centralized and uniform society. While some members of the academic community have dissented from these views, by and large they are taught simultaneously with (and indeed as if they were) the law. The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies is a group of conservatives and libertarians interested in the current state of the legal order. It is founded on the principles that the state exists to preserve freedom, that the separation of governmental powers is central to our Constitution, and that it is emphatically the province and duty of the judiciary to say what the law is, not what it should be. The Society seeks both to promote an awareness of these principles and to further their application through its activities. This entails reordering priorities within the legal system to place a premium on individual liberty, traditional values, and the rule of law. It also requires restoring the recognition of the importance of these norms among lawyers, judges, law students and professors. In working to achieve these goals, the Society has created a conservative intellectual network that extends to all levels of the legal community.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 116 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 116 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 165 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, DECEMBER 19, 2019 No. 206 Senate The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was U.S. SENATE, House amendment to the Senate called to order by the Honorable THOM PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE, amendment), to change the enactment TILLIS, a Senator from the State of Washington, DC, December 19, 2019. date. North Carolina. To the Senate: McConnell Amendment No. 1259 (to Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3, Amendment No. 1258), of a perfecting f of the Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby appoint the Honorable THOM TILLIS, a Sen- nature. McConnell motion to refer the mes- PRAYER ator from the State of North Carolina, to perform the duties of the Chair. sage of the House on the bill to the The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- CHUCK GRASSLEY, Committee on Appropriations, with in- fered the following prayer: President pro tempore. structions, McConnell Amendment No. Let us pray. Mr. TILLIS thereupon assumed the 1260, to change the enactment date. Eternal God, You are our light and Chair as Acting President pro tempore. McConnell Amendment No. 1261 (the salvation, and we are not afraid. You instructions (Amendment No. 1260) of f protect us from danger so we do not the motion to refer), of a perfecting na- tremble. RESERVATION OF LEADER TIME ture. Mighty God, You are not intimidated The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- McConnell Amendment No. 1262 (to by the challenges that confront our Na- pore.
    [Show full text]
  • OEA 2018 Election Guide
    OEA 2018 Election Guide Read the full responses from all participating candidates at okea.org/legislative. 1 2018 Election Guide: Table of Contents State Senate Page 7 State House of Representatives Page 30 Statewide Elections Page 107 Congress Page 117 Judicial Elections Page 123 State Questions Page 127 Candidate Recommendaitons Page 133 Need help? Contact your regional team. The Education Focus (ISSN 1542-1678) Oklahoma City Metro, Northwest, Southeast is published quarterly for $5 and Southwest Teams by the Oklahoma Education Association, The Digital Education Focus 323 E. Madison, Okla. City, OK 73105 323 E. Madison, Oklahoma City, OK 73105. 800/522-8091 or 405/528-7785 Periodicals postage paid at Okla. City, OK, Volume 35, No. 4 and additional mailing offices. The Education Focus is a production Northeast and Tulsa Metro Teams POSTMASTER: Send address changes of the Oklahoma Education Association’s 10820 E. 45th , Suite. 110, Tulsa, OK, 74146 to The Education Focus, PO Box 18485, Communications Center. 800/331-5143 or 918/665-2282 Oklahoma City, OK 73154. Alicia Priest, President Katherine Bishop, Vice President Join the conversation. David DuVall, Executive Director okea.org Amanda Ewing, Associate Executive Director Facebook – Oklahoma.Education.Association Doug Folks, Editor and Student.Oklahoma.Education.Association Bill Guy, Communications twitter.com/okea (@okea) Carrie Coppernoll Jacobs, Social Media instagram.com/insta_okea Jacob Tharp, Center Assistant pinterest.com/oeaedupins Read the full responses from all participating candidates at okea.org/legislative. 2 2018 Election Guide Now is the time to persevere Someone once said that “Perseverance is the hard work you do after you get tired of the hard work you already did.” NOW is the time to roll up our sleeves, dig in, and persevere! When walkout at the apitol was over, I stood in a press conference with my colleagues and announced that what we didn’t gain this legislative session, we would next gain in the next.
    [Show full text]
  • Petitioners, V
    NO. In the Supreme Court of the United States STATE OF OKLAHOMA; OKLAHOMA INDUSTRIAL ENERGY CONSUMERS; OKLAHOMA GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; SIERRA CLUB, Respondents. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Michael Graves E. Scott Pruitt Thomas P. Schroedter Oklahoma Attorney General HALL ESTILL, Patrick R. Wyrick Attorneys at Law Solicitor General 320 South Boston Ave. Counsel of Record Suite 200 P. Clayton Eubanks Tulsa, OK 74103 Deputy Solicitor General (918) 594-0443 OKLAHOMA ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE Attorneys for Petitioner 313 NE 21st Street Oklahoma Industrial Oklahoma City, OK 73105 Energy Consumers (405) 521-3921 [email protected] Attorneys for Petitioner State of Oklahoma (additional counsel listed on inside cover) Becker Gallagher · Cincinnati, OH · Washington, D.C. · 800.890.5001 Brian J. Murray Charles T. Wehland Dennis Murashko JONES DAY 77 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60601 (312) 782-3939 Michael L. Rice JONES DAY 717 Texas, Suite 3300 Houston, TX 77002 (832) 239-3640 Attorneys for Petitioner Oklahoma Gas And Electric Company i QUESTION PRESENTED The Regional Haze Program of the Clean Air Act allocates to the States the task of fashioning and then implementing plans to improve the aesthetic quality of air over certain federal lands. The question presented is whether, despite that allocation of powers to the States, the United States Environmental Protection Agency may nonetheless conduct a de novo review of the State of Oklahomas plan, in conflict with both the limited authority granted to the agency under the Act and decisions of this and other courts that have recognized the primary role given to the States in implementing the Clean Air Act.
    [Show full text]