HMVS Cerberus Conservation Management Plan September 2002

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

HMVS Cerberus Conservation Management Plan September 2002 HMVS Cerberus Conservation Management Plan September 2002 Prepared by Ross Anderson Maritime Heritage Unit Heritage Victoria CONTENTS Acknowledgements 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Scope of Conservation Management Plan 2.0 Definition of the site 2.1 Position of the Cerberus 2.2 Area of the rectangular Protected Zone 3.0 Statement of cultural heritage significance 3.1 International 3.2 National 3.3 State 3.4 Local 3.5 Aesthetic 3.6 Archaeological 3.7 Historical 3.8 Technical 3.9 Scientific 3.10 Recreational 3.11 Ability to demonstrate 4.0 Elements of historic fabric 4.1 Deck and turrets 4.2 Collapsed hull 4.3 Buried hull 5.0 Conservation policy 5.1 Conservation options 5.1.1 Managed collapse and cathodic protection 5.1.2 Removal of deck to a land-based display and more stable environment 5.1.3 Stabilisation of deck in-situ with supporting structure 5.2 Conservation of elements 5.2.1 Guns and turrets 5.2.2 Hull 5.2.2.1 Intrusive materials 5.2.2.2 Destructive works 5.2.3 Buried hull 5.2.4 Timber deck 5.2.4.1 Maintenance 5.2.4.2 Removal 5.3 Support substructure 5.4 Risks, public access and risk management 5.4.1 Assessment of risk 5.4.2 Public access 5.4.3 Risk management 5.5 Flexibility of conservation policy 6.0 Care of Fabric and Maintenance 7.0 Documentation 8.0 Planning and management structure for future work and maintenance 8.1 ‘Save the Cerberus Alliance’ committee members 8.2 Historic Shipwrecks Advisory Committee (HSAC) and Heritage Council 9.0 Bibliography Acknowledgements Many people have assisted with their comments toward the final version of this document. Thank you to my Heritage Victoria work colleagues Peter Harvey, Cassandra Philippou, Ray Tonkin and Sue Balderstone. Also to members of the Victorian Heritage Council’s Historic Shipwrecks Advisory Committee, the Save the Cerberus Alliance, the National Trust’s Industrial Heritage committee, Dr Mike McCarthy and Dr Ian McLeod of the Western Australian Museum, and Ray Tyshing from GHD Engineers. I would also like to acknowledge the efforts of all those who have campaigned for the stabilisation, restoration and recognition of the Cerberus over the years. Cover photographs: VR insignia on muzzle loading gun in aft turret (Heritage Victoria) Queen's Birthday on Board HMVS Cerberus: Man & Arm Ship (State Library of Victoria) 1.0 Introduction On 26 December 1993 the intact buoyant hull of the HMVS Cerberus shipwreck built in 1867, scuttled in Half Moon Bay since 1926, catastrophically collapsed in a south-westerly storm. The collapse is recorded on video taken by Black Rock Yacht Club members filming the ferocity of the storm from their clubhouse. A subsequent major collapse occurred in November 1994. Such a catastrophic collapse, rather than gradual deterioration, had been anticipated for at least half a century (Effenberger, 1995: 16). Prior to this collapse, community support for schemes to ‘Save the Cerberus’ by refloating it and towing it to a berth in Williamstown or next to the Polly Woodside, relied on the buoyant hull of the Cerberus being repairable and restorable. A survey commissioned by the National Trust in 1969 however found that the hull was structurally too corroded to support the weight of the Cerberus (Effenberger, 1995: 9). Ultimately any thought of pursuing this preferred course of conservation/ restoration was rendered impossible by the 1993 collapse (Colquhoun, 1994: 1). In 1970 Prince Phillip revived interest in the Cerberus with a letter of support for its historic status and preservation. Following this the Cerberus Preservation Trust, later the Maritime Trust of Australia, was formed in 1971. This organisation was unsuccessful in its bid to reach a target of $500,000 in a public appeal to salvage the Cerberus and tow it to Duke and Orrs dry dock. Efforts to secure $3.5 million in federal government funding in 1985 and corporate funding from BHP in the 1988 were also unsuccessful (Effenberger, 1995: 9). Notably all public and community funding proposals to preserve the Cerberus have budgeted for public access with museums, walkways and site interpretation. Suggested conservation options for the HMVS Cerberus shipwreck post-collapse of the hull have included filling the hull with sand, concrete or foam, building a cofferdam around the site to create a ‘Cerberus Island’ and raising and stabilising the intact deck, turrets and guns with a supporting framework. The next major stage in the collapse of the Cerberus is predicted to be the breaking up of the deck as it is further stressed and hinged out of alignment by the weight of the armour, turrets and guns, without the even support previously provided by the buoyant hull (Colquhoun 1994: 2; MacLeod 1999). In a wreck inspection by the MHU in April 1999 the stem-post was observed to have split, indicating the Cerberus is entering into this final stage of collapse. The unique structure of the Cerberus can be described as a tank mounted on a barge. The ‘tank’ consists of 1800 tons of 8-9 inch thick armoured deck, breastwork, turrets and guns, that have predictably ‘squashed’ the lightly built, 300 ton, corroded hull of the ‘barge’. As the technical, aesthetic and historic significance (see 3.0 below) of the Cerberus is primarily the substantially intact ‘tank’, post-collapse efforts to preserve the Cerberus have focussed on supporting and conserving the intact deck in-situ (see Strachan, 1995). In the 1990s community lobbying by individuals and members of the National Trust, World Ship Society, Maritime Museums of Victoria, Historic Shipwrecks Advisory Committee, Maritime Archaeology Association of Victoria and the ‘Save the Cerberus’ group have ensured that the Cerberus does not sink beneath the waves as a heritage issue. The Australian and international conservation and maritime archaeological community has also offered support to encourage any efforts to stabilise and conserve the historic fabric of the Cerberus (McLeod, Dr. Ian, 2002, pers. comm., Broadwater, John, Curator USS Monitor National Marine Sanctuary, pers. comm. 2000; Gould, Prof. Richard, pers. comm., 2002). Additionally the recognition of iron and steam shipwrecks in Australia as an archaeological resource with historic, industrial and technical values has gained momentum since 1985 when Australia’s first ‘Iron Ships and Steam Shipwreck Archaeology’ conference was held in Fremantle, Western Australia (McCarthy, Ed., 1988). For this site type Victoria is fortunate to have the first screw steamship to cross the Pacific Ocean and first screw steamer to travel between Sydney and Melbourne (SS Conside (1852)), the first ship to travel directly from Belfast, Ireland to Melbourne (SS Ant (1862)) the first American steamship to cross the Pacific Ocean (SS Monumental City (1853)), Australia’s earliest located steamship (PS Clonmel (1841)) and the world’s only remaining twin turret breastwork Monitor (HMVS Cerberus (1867-1926)). Since 1994 the MHU has commissioned an HMVS Cerberus Archive Directory (Effenberger, 1995), corrosion and ultra-sound surveys (McLeod, 1994; 1999) and an appraisal of cathodic protection options (McLeod, 1999). A Cerberus Project Team was set up and a Conservation Plan project progress report with corrosion survey report, transitional conservation policy, recommendations, material costings on immediate actions required with costing estimates for other long term actions was prepared (Strachan, 1995). In May 2000 Heritage Victoria let selective tenders for engineering advice as to the practicality of raising and stabilising the intact deck, armoured breastwork and turrets to its pre-collapse level. The successful tenderer Gutteridge Haskins Davey (GHD) provided a methodology that met the conservation aims of stabilising the deck of the Cerberus. GHD advised the next step was to conduct an engineering parameters survey to determine the structural strength of the Cerberus structure, and geological survey of surrounding seabed for calculations of piling required for the jacking process. 1.1 Scope of Conservation Management Plan This aim of this CMP is to investigate the significance of the structure in its current form, and to clearly state the components of the structure that must be retained. This will be done in accordance with the Burra Charter (1999), the accepted standard guidelines for the management of sites of European cultural heritage significance in Australia. All definitions are in accordance with those as defined in the Burra Charter. The CMP has also been produced to complement a proposed action plan, to guide engineering parameter surveys and possible major engineering works to be undertaken on the site of the HMVS Cerberus shipwreck. These works are intended to investigate a) the feasibility of stabilising the site and b) support the deck structure sufficiently to prevent further collapse. The proposed works involve piling, jacking, destructive testing and intrusion of modern materials. Following the testing phase, and subject to funding, further proposed engineering works will involve the installation of a support structure on the site to raise the Cerberus to its pre-collapse level. The CMP also discusses options for conservation management of the site. 2.0 Definition of site 2.1 Position of the Cerberus Latitude South 37 degrees 58.1’ Longitude East 144 degrees 0.4’ (Victoria Government Gazette, 6 October 1994 p. 2684) 2.2 Area of the rectangular Protected Zone Approximately 0.5 hectare, with longer sides parallel to the length of the Cerberus and at a distance of 25 metres from the longitudinal centreline of the vessel, and the shorter side 5 metres to seaward from the peak of the bow and stern respectively. (Victoria Government Gazette, 6 October 1994 p. 2684) The perimeter of the Protected Zone is marked by floating tethered buoys surrounding the wrecksite, clearly marked with the words ‘Protected Zone’ and ‘No Entry’.
Recommended publications
  • Winter 2006 HNSA Anchor Watch.Qxd 2/4/2008 5:12 PM Page 1
    FallWinter 2007 HNSA Anchor Watch:Winter 2006 HNSA Anchor Watch.qxd 2/4/2008 5:12 PM Page 1 NCHOR FALL 2007 A & WATCH WINTER 2008 The Quarterly Journal of the Historic Naval Ships Association www.hnsa.org SAVING THE LAST MONITOR: H.M.V.S. CERBERUS FallWinter 2007 HNSA Anchor Watch:Winter 2006 HNSA Anchor Watch.qxd 2/4/2008 5:12 PM Page 2 2 ANCHOR WATCH H.N.S.A. STAFF H.N.S.A. OFFICERS President Executive Director William N. Tunnell, Jr., U.S.S. ALABAMA/U.S.S. DRUM CDR Jeffrey S. Nilsson, U.S.N. (Ret.) Vice President Executive Director Emeritus RADM John P. (Mac) McLaughlin, U.S.S. MIDWAY CAPT Channing M. Zucker, U.S.N. (Ret.) Secretary Executive Secretary LCDR Sherry Richardson, H.M.C.S. SACKVILLE James W. Cheevers Treasurer Individual Member Program Manager COL Patrick J. Cunningham CDR Jeffrey S. Nilsson, U.S.N. (Ret.) Buffalo & Erie County Naval & Military Park Anchor Watch Editor Immediate Past President Jason W. Hall Captain F. W. "Rocco" Montesano, U.S.S. LEXINGTON Battleship NEW JERSEY Museum Webmaster HONORARY DIRECTORS Richard S. Pekelney Admiral Thad W. Allen, U.S. Coast Guard International Coordinator Sean Connaughton, MARAD Brad King Admiral Michael G. Mullen, U.S. Navy H.M.S. BELFAST Larry Ostola, Parks Canada Vice Admiral Drew Robertson, Royal Canadian Navy Admiral Sir Alan West, GCB DCD, Royal Navy DIRECTORS AT LARGE Captain Jack Casey, U.S.N. (Ret) H.N.S.A. COMMITTEE U.S.S. MASSACHUSETTS Memorial CHAIRPERSONS Troy Collins Battleship NEW JERSEY Museum Maury Drummond Annual Conference U.S.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue 96 In
    Jean-Louis Boglio Maritime Books P.O. Box 424 Cygnet, ABN 50 378 355 979 Tasmania 7112, Phone: +61 (0)3 6203 0101 Australia [email protected] Catalogue 96 ~ August 2021 4. ABERDEEN & COMMONWEALTH LINE PORT SAID and SUEZ CANAL Aberdeen & Commonwealth Line. London. 1931. September 1931 edition. 4 PP with 2 house flags and illustrated front (a Scottish terrier). Covers lightly soiled and worn, o/wise near fine. 21.6 x 14. Brief history and description of the crossing. 72201 $20 1. ABERDEEN & COMMONWEALTH LINE 5. ADELAIDE STEAMSHIP ADEN - The Barren Rocks T.S.M.V. MANOORA Aberdeen & Commonwealth Line. London. 1947. December The Adelaide Steamship 1947 edition. 12 PP with 3 b/w photos. Stapled soft cover with Company Ltd. Adelaide. c. title and House-Flag. Booklet with vertical crease, o/wise near 1935. Folded poster (36.5 x fine. Oblong: 14 x 20.5. Covers the history, the dhows, 50.4 cms). Recto: “Luxurious products and trade. 72203 $20 Twin Screw Motor Liner Manoora” (10,860 Tons) with 1 colour illustration “T.S.M.V. Manoora at sea” and 17 b/w photos of 2. ABERDEEN & accommodation. Verso: COMMONWEALTH LINE TSMV Manoora EMBARKATION and Accommodation Plan Baggage Notice T.S.S. (decks A, B, C, D, & E). “Esperance Bay” Light wear and 3 small Aberdeen & Commonwealth closed tears repaired with Line. London. 1934. March acid-free clear tape, o/wise 1934 edition. Sailing from near fine. Scarce. Folded Southampton on 10 October size: 19 x 16. Arrived 1934. 4 PP with 1 Sydney 23/05/1935 illustration at back (a (maiden voyage).
    [Show full text]
  • Back Issues Available
    INRO Available Back Issues of Warship International August 2015 VOL. 3, No. 1 1966 Featuring: Losses – Royal Italian Navy 1915-18; Lexington Battle Cruisers; The Early Jean Barts; Soviet Potpourri.. Vol. 20, No. 3 1983 Featuring: The Development of “A” Class Cruisers in the Imperial Japanese Navy, Part VI. Vol. 21, No. 1 1984 Featuring: NRC/INRO the First 20 Years; An INRO Library; Early Spanish Steam Warships, Part II; Exterior Ballistics with Microcomputers. Vol. 21, No. 2 1984 Featuring: Sparrows Among the Hawks; Elisabeta; Elisabeta and Her Armament; New Developments in the Soviet Navy; The Spanish Navy of 1898; Battleships, A Vulnerable Anachronism? Vol. 21, No. 3 1984 Featuring: The Development of the “A Class” Cruisers in the Japanese Navy, Part VII. Vol. 23, No. 3 1986 Featuring: The Thai Navy; The U.S. Fleet at the New York World’s Fair, 1939; The Last, Strange Cruise of UB-88. Vol. 24, No. 1 1987 Featuring: Phantom Fleet – The Confederacy’s Unclaimed European Warships; Sous La Crois De Lorraine (Under the Cross of Lorraine); Japanese Naval Construction, 1915-45; HMNZS Tui; The Mystery of the Austro-Hungarian submarine U-30. Vol. 24, No. 2 1987 Featuring: The Loss of HMS Hood – A Re-examination; Developments in the Soviet Navy; The fate of the Chinese Torpedo Gunboat Fei Ting; The Fate of the Four Chinese Torpedo Boat Destroyers. Vol. 24, No. 3 1987 Featuring: U.S. Navy in WW II – A Basic Bibliography; A Day at the New York Navy Yard; 50 Years of Army Dredge Boats; The Attack on the USS Stark; Battleships – Impressions of a Dinosaur; Submarine Hull design and Diving Depths Between the Wars.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses Battleships and Dividends: The Rise of Private Armaments Firms in Great Britain and Italy, c. 1860-1914 MARCHISIO, GIULIO How to cite: MARCHISIO, GIULIO (2012) Battleships and Dividends: The Rise of Private Armaments Firms in Great Britain and Italy, c. 1860-1914, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/7323/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Battleships and Dividends: The Rise of Private Armaments Firms in Great Britain and Italy, c. 1860-1914 Giulio Marchisio This thesis analyses the rise of private armaments firms in Great Britain and in Italy from mid-19th century to the outbreak of the First World War, with a focus on naval armaments and military shipbuilding. During this period, the armaments industry underwent a radical transformation, moving from being based on public-owned arsenals and yards to being based on private firms – the system of military procurement prevalent today.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Aneurin
    The Aneurin Great War Project: Timeline Part 8 - The War Machines, 1870-1894 Copyright Notice: This material was written and published in Wales by Derek J. Smith (Chartered Engineer). It forms part of a multifile e-learning resource, and subject only to acknowledging Derek J. Smith's rights under international copyright law to be identified as author may be freely downloaded and printed off in single complete copies solely for the purposes of private study and/or review. Commercial exploitation rights are reserved. The remote hyperlinks have been selected for the academic appropriacy of their contents; they were free of offensive and litigious content when selected, and will be periodically checked to have remained so. Copyright © 2013-2021, Derek J. Smith. First published 09:00 BST 5th July 2014. This version 09:00 GMT 20th January 2021 [BUT UNDER CONSTANT EXTENSION AND CORRECTION, SO CHECK AGAIN SOON] This timeline supports the Aneurin series of interdisciplinary scientific reflections on why the Great War failed so singularly in its bid to be The War to End all Wars. It presents actual or best-guess historical event and introduces theoretical issues of cognitive science as they become relevant. UPWARD Author's Home Page Project Aneurin, Scope and Aims Master References List FORWARD IN TIME Part 1 - (Ape)men at War, Prehistory to 730 Part 2 - Royal Wars (Without Gunpowder), 731 to 1272 Part 3 - Royal Wars (With Gunpowder), 1273-1602 Part 4 - The Religious Civil Wars, 1603-1661 Part 5 - Imperial Wars, 1662-1763 Part 6 - The Georgian Wars, 1764-1815 Part 7 - Economic Wars, 1816-1869 FORWARD IN TIME Part 9 - Insults at the Weigh-In, 1895-1914 Part 10 - The War Itself, 1914 Part 10 - The War Itself, 1915 Part 10 - The War Itself, 1916 Part 10 - The War Itself, 1917 Part 10 - The War Itself, 1918 Part 11 - Deception as a Profession, 1919 to date The Timeline Items 1870 Charles A.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Admiralty War Staff and Its Influence on the Conduct of The
    ‘The Admiralty War Staff and its influence on the conduct of the naval between 1914 and 1918.’ Nicholas Duncan Black University College University of London. Ph.D. Thesis. 2005. UMI Number: U592637 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U592637 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 CONTENTS Page Abstract 4 Acknowledgements 5 Abbreviations 6 Introduction 9 Chapter 1. 23 The Admiralty War Staff, 1912-1918. An analysis of the personnel. Chapter 2. 55 The establishment of the War Staff, and its work before the outbreak of war in August 1914. Chapter 3. 78 The Churchill-Battenberg Regime, August-October 1914. Chapter 4. 103 The Churchill-Fisher Regime, October 1914 - May 1915. Chapter 5. 130 The Balfour-Jackson Regime, May 1915 - November 1916. Figure 5.1: Range of battle outcomes based on differing uses of the 5BS and 3BCS 156 Chapter 6: 167 The Jellicoe Era, November 1916 - December 1917. Chapter 7. 206 The Geddes-Wemyss Regime, December 1917 - November 1918 Conclusion 226 Appendices 236 Appendix A.
    [Show full text]
  • Battleship to Breakwater
    THE SANDRINGHAM HISTORICAL SERIES No. 3 H M V S CERBERUS BATTLESHIP TO BREAKWATER Historic Iron Monitor Warship of the Victorian Navy by R.J. Herd, B.Sc., F.R.I.N.A., M.I.E., Aust. ABOUT THE SANDRINGHAM HISTORICAL SERIES The previous booklets in the Series are: No. 1: The first people of Black Rock − The Bunurong Tribe of Aborigines, 1982. No. 2: Black Rock House, 1983. It is intended that there be further publications in this series dealing with other aspects of Sandringham's history. The series is published by the City of Sandringham, Municipal Offices, Royal Avenue, Sandringham, 3191, Victoria, Australia, telephone (03) 598 8111. National Library of Australia Card Number and ISBN 1ST EDITION MAY, 1986 ISBN: 0−9596863−8−X COPYRIGHT: TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction 2 Early Melbourne 3 Protection for Port Phillip 3 The Name 6 The Design 7 The Voyage from England 11 Fifty−Three Years of Service 12 Acquisition by Sandringham Council 14 The Future 15 Recollections of Commander R. S. Veale (Retired) 15 List of Relics 15 Further Reading 15 Acknowledgments 16 Main Features of Cerberus 17 Appendix 1 19 Appendix 2 20 Appendix 3 23 Appendix 4 24 HMVS 'CERBERUS' − BATTLESHIP TO BREAKWATER 1. INTRODUCTION This volume in the Sandringham Environment Series deals with the 'Cerberus', the iron−clad man−o−war and former flagship of the Victorian Navy that now lies rusting as a breakwater for small craft in Half Moon Bay, Black Rock. The 'Cerberus' is one of the most historically important naval vessels in esistence.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing the Dutch and British Maritime Technologies During the Napoleonic Era (1792–1815)
    Technology and Empire: Comparing the Dutch and British Maritime Technologies during the Napoleonic Era (1792–1815) By Ivor Mollema December, 2015 Director of Thesis: Dr. Lynn Harris Major Department: History The two ships, Bato (1806) and Brunswick (1805) wrecked in Simons Bay, South Africa, provide an opportunity to compare British and Dutch maritime technologies during the Napoleonic Era (1792–1815). The former was a Dutch 74-gun ship of the line and the latter a British East Indiaman. Their remains reveal pertinent information about the maritime technologies available to each European power. Industrial capacity and advanced metal working played a significant role in ship construction initiatives of that period, while the dwindling timber supplies forced invention of new technologies. Imperial efforts during the Napoleonic Era relied on naval power. Maritime technologies dictated imperial strategy as ships were deployed to expand or maintain colonial empires. Naval theorists place the strategy into a wider spectrum and the analysis of the material culture complements further understanding of sea power. The study also recommends management options to preserve the archaeological sites for future study and to showcase for heritage tourism. TECHNOLOGY AND EMPIRE: Comparing Dutch and British Maritime Technologies During the Napoleonic Era (1792–1815) Title Page A Thesis Presented To The Faculty of the Department of History East Carolina University In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts, Program in Maritime Studies by Ivor Mollema December, 2015 © Ivor Mollema, 2015 Copyright Page TECHNOLOGY AND EMPIRE: Comparing Dutch and British Maritime Technologies During the Napoleonic Era (1792–1815) by Ivor Mollema Signature Page APPROVED BY: DIRECTOR OF THESIS: ________________________________________________________ Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's National Heritage
    HMVS Cerberus VITORC IA Named after the three-headed mythological guard dog, Australia’s HMVS Cerberus was purpose-built for the Victorian Colonial Navy in 1868. The prototype of modern steam-powered battleships, her unique design laid the foundations for all surface, gun-armed warships for a century, until the advent of guided missiles in the late 1960s. The heavy iron superstructure and lighter iron hull were a radical departure from the wooden warships that had previously dominated world navies. I n the 1860s, the Victorian Government was in the market for a powerful warship. Britain and Russia prepared to face each other in battle again as the threat of a second Crimean War became very real. The Australian colonies, half a world away from Britain, faced the possibility of hostile attack by a Russian flotilla. Her main armament consisted of four 10-inch muzzle HMVS was the flagship of theV ictorian Cerberus loading guns mounted in two turrets. Cerberus’ guns were Colonial Navy, protecting Melbourne and Victoria’s rich capable of firing a round every 1.5 minutes; exceptionally gold resources from foreign attack. Upon Federation in fast for the standards of the day. She also had ballast 1901 she was transferred to the Commonwealth naval tanks that could be filled to sink the hull and lower her forces and then became an inaugural unit of the Royal freeboard to further reduce her profile in battle. Australian Navy in 1911. Throughout her 53 years of service, HMVS Cerberus By 1924 she was declared surplus to the Navy and was was never required to fire a shell at an enemy.
    [Show full text]
  • River Flotillas in Support of Defensive Ground Operations: the Soviet Experience
    The Journal of Slavic Military Studies ISSN: 1351-8046 (Print) 1556-3006 (Online) Journal homepage: http://tandfonline.com/loi/fslv20 River Flotillas in Support of Defensive Ground Operations: The Soviet Experience Lester W. Grau To cite this article: Lester W. Grau (2016) River Flotillas in Support of Defensive Ground Operations: The Soviet Experience, The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 29:1, 73-98, DOI: 10.1080/13518046.2016.1129875 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13518046.2016.1129875 Published online: 16 Feb 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 51 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=fslv20 Download by: [Combined Arms Research Library] Date: 09 May 2016, At: 10:45 JOURNAL OF SLAVIC MILITARY STUDIES 2016, VOL. 29, NO. 1, 73–98 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13518046.2016.1129875 River Flotillas in Support of Defensive Ground Operations: The Soviet Experience Lester W. Grau Foreign Military Studies Oce ABSTRACT In the history of warfare, ground and naval forces frequently have to cooperate. There are usually problems putting these two forces together since their missions, equipment, training, communications and mutual unfamiliarity get in the way. These problems are common during transport of ground force equipment and personnel aboard naval vessels, exacer- bated during amphibious landings and assaults and very di- cult when operating together along major rivers. This article analyzes the Soviet history of defensive river otilla combat during the rst period of the Great Patriotic War (World War II against Germany).
    [Show full text]
  • Captain Burges Watson, C.V.O., R.N. Oct
    No. Service: Rank: Names & Service Information: Supporting Information: 24. 4th 27th Captain Burges Watson, C.V.O., R.N. Oct. Nov. B. 24 Sept 1846, St Nicholas, 1st Son of Rundle Burges Watson R.N. (B. 1809- 1896 1899 Warwick, Warwickshire, England. Alphington, Devon D. 5 July 1860). Who was, in D. 21 Sept 1902 died on Malta of turn eldest son of Captain Joshua Rowley pneumonia (aged 55). Watson (1772-1810) Rundle Burges Watson Mason R.N., died 5 Jul 1806 (while serving as 27 1 Oct 1859 Entered Naval Service aged Nov 1899 Superintendent of Sheerness Dockyard). 1895 13 years. Burges’s mother was Helen (1820-Bathampton April 1861 Census shows Burges Somerset, England.). Watson as a Naval Cadet, aged 14, Issue: 3 children, 1 boy, 2 girls. Ryde, Isle of White. 5 Jul 1866 Naval Cadet Burges 20 Sept 1882 - Married to Marie Thérèse Watson was promoted to Watson (nee Fischer) B. 1856 New Zealand, D. Mate/Sub Lieutenant. Nov 27, 1918 (62 yrs.) London, Middlesex, 5 Sep 1866 Sub Lieutenant Burges England. Watson Promoted to the rank of Lieutenant. Marriage Notice: The Sydney Morning Herald Jun 1867-Jan 1869 Lieutenant (New South Wales: 1842 - 1954) Thu 5 Oct 1882 Burges Watson posted to H.M.S. Page 13 Family Notices: WATSON—FISCHER— “Arethusa”, a wooden 4th Rate, Sept. 20, by Rev. T. Kemmis, Burges Watson, to launched as a sailing vessel of the Marie Thérèse Fischer. Constance class from Pembroke Registration Number Groom's Surname Groom's Royal Dockyard 20 Jun 1849. Her Given Name(s) Bride's Last Name at Time of builder’s measure was 2132 tons Marriage Bride's Given Name(s) District with a displacement of 3832 tons, 2700/1882 WATSON BURGES FISCHER MARIE I armed with 50 guns.
    [Show full text]
  • H.M.V.S. Cerberus “A Monitor Downunder”
    H.M.V.S. CERBERUS A snarling Cerberus keeps the Russian bear at bay. i “A MONITOR DOWNUNDER” a “National Heritage Place” When about to be scuttled in 1926 The Herald reported:- “Aptly named, the old ship prowled around the bay for half a century, a watchdog with fearful barks from her 18 ton muzzle loaders, a veritable ‘Old Ironside.’ She was the cradle of the fleet - the nursery where two generations of sailors learned their art and craft.” ii Named after the fearsome three headed dog in Greek mythology, the ironclad HMVS Cerberus is arguably the world's most important accessible shipwreck. Launched in 1868, at the Palmer Shipbuilding Company Works on the Tyne River in the UK, just six years after the USS Monitor, she was one of the most powerful and revolutionary warships the world had ever seen - the forerunner of all modern battleships. Today, the wreck of the HMVS Cerberus lies in just 15 feet of water off an Australian suburban beach, her lower iron hull in an advanced state of collapse after 78 years battling the elements as a breakwater. A frightening product of the Industrial Revolution, Cerberus was the world's first truly integrated modern "battleship", or capital ship, a radical departure from the wooden and iron hulled warships that had previously dominated the navies of the world. Drawing inspiration from the USS Monitor, Edward Reed improved upon the monitor design with a range of successful innovations, the most important of which was her raised central superstructure or armoured breastwork. This eight inch thick armoured belt provided superior protection and seaworthiness, while allowing her dual rotating turrets to move and fire while under steam, greatly enhancing manoeuvrability and fighting capacity.
    [Show full text]