DOCSLIB.ORG

Future of the Ukrainian Pension System Adequacy, Coverage and Sustainability SOCIAL PROTECTION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Future of the Ukrainian Pension System Adequacy, Coverage and Sustainability SOCIAL PROTECTION International Labour Organization Future of the Ukrainian Pension System Adequacy, Coverage and Sustainability SOCIAL PROTECTION DECENT WORK TECHNICAL SUPPORT TEAM AND COUNTRY OFFICE FOR CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE Future of the Ukrainian Pension System Adequacy, Coverage and Sustainability ILO DECENT WORK TECHNICAL SUPPORT TEAM AND COUNTRY OFFICE FOR CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE Copyright © International Labour Organization 2019 First published 2019 Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to ILO Publications (Rights and Licensing), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland, or by email: [email protected]. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered with reproduction rights organizations may make copies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. Visit www.ifrro.org to find the reproduction rights organization in your country. Future of the Ukrainian pension system: adequacy, coverage and sustainability / International Labour Organization; ILO Decent Work Technical Support Team and Country Office for Central and Eastern Europe. -Budapest: ILO, 2019 Майбутнє пенсійної системи України: адекватність, охоплення та стійкість / Міжнародна організація праці; Група технічної підтримки з питань гідної праці та Бюро МОП для країн Центральної та Східної Європи. – Будапешт: МОП, 2019 9789220316283 (print) 9789220316290 (web PDF) The designations employed in ILO publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Labour Office concerning the legal status of any country, area or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. The responsibility for opinions expressed in signed articles, studies and other contributions rests solely with their authors, and publication does not constitute an endorsement by the International Labour Office of the opinions expressed in them. Reference to names of firms and commercial products and processes does not imply their endorsement by the International Labour Office, and any failure to mention a particular firm, commercial product or process is not a sign of disapproval. Information on ILO publications and digital products can be found at: www.ilo.org/publns. Printed in Hungary Cover photo© 2018 The Associated Press Contents Foreword .......................................................................................... v Summary ........................................................................................vii Introduction .....................................................................................1 1. Adequacy of old-age benefits in the Ukrainian pension system ..........3 1.1 Adequacy of old-age benefits based on international standards ....... 3 1.1.1 Guiding principles of income security in old age – Recommendation No. 67 ...................................................................................3 1.1.2 Minimum standards of old-age pensions – Conventions No. 102 and No. 128, and Recommendation No. 131 ........4 1.1.3 Basic income security and access to essential health care for all – Recommendation No. 202 .................................................................................6 1.1.4 Ensuring adequacy throughout the life by pension indexation ..................7 1.2 Assessment of the adequacy of old-age pensions in the Ukrainian pension system ............................................................... 8 1.2.1 Pension formula ....................................................................................................8 1.2.2 Retirement age and the required contribution period .............................. 12 1.2.3 Pension indexation ............................................................................................ 14 1.2.4 The minimum pension guarantee .................................................................. 15 1.3 Conclusions and recommendations .............................................. 21 1.3.1 Options to improve the adequacy of old-age pensions and enhance the minimum guarantees ................................................................................. 21 1.3.2 Concluding remarks ......................................................................................... 22 i FUTURE OF THE UKRAINIAN PENSION SYSTEM | CONTENTS 2. Coverage and compliance: the informal economy and undeclared work ................................... 27 2.1 Problem analysis .......................................................................... 27 2.2 Coverage gaps of the Ukrainian pension system ........................... 29 2.2.1 Coverage of insured workers .......................................................................... 29 2.2.2 Low labour force participation and high unemployment ........................ 30 2.2.3 Informal economy and undeclared work ..................................................... 31 2.2.4 Non-standard forms of employment ............................................................ 33 2.3 Conclusions and recommendations .............................................. 35 2.3.1 Measures to extend social security coverage in Ukraine........................... 35 2.3.2 Concluding remarks ........................................................................................ 37 3. Financing the Ukrainian pension system ....................................... 41 3.1 The current financial situation of the Pension Fund ...................... 41 3.2 Long-term actuarial projection results ......................................... 44 3.2.1 Initial remarks ................................................................................................... 44 3.2.2 Key results of the 2017 actuarial valuation by the Pension Fund ..................................................................................................... 45 3.3 Conclusions and recommendations .............................................. 52 3.3.1 Financial and social implications of the status quo projection ............... 52 3.3.2 Need for exploring a wider range of policy options .................................. 52 4. The introduction of mandatory funded pensions: cautionary remarks ..................................................................... 55 Conclusions ................................................................................... 61 References ..................................................................................... 62 ii FUTURE OF THE UKRAINIAN PENSION SYSTEM | CONTENTS Tables Table 1.1. Comparison of benefit rates for a pensioner with a 30-year contribution period by different accrual rates ...............................................11 Table 1.2. Comparison of replacement rates of a model pension with a 30-year contribution period by different accrual rates and wage growth rates ...............................................................................12 Table 1.3. Eligibility conditions for old-age pensions ...................................................13 Table 1.4. Number of newly-awarded pensions by sex and contribution years, 2016–2018 ............................................................................................................14 Table 1.5. Number of newly awarded pensions by sex and contribution years, 2016–2018 ............................................................................................................16 Table 1.6. Comparison of the statutory and estimated subsistence minimums, 2015–2019 ............................................................................................................17 Table 1.7. Comparison of subsistence minimums, the minimum and average wage, and the minimum pension, 2015–2019 .......................20 Table 2.1. Number of pensioners by type, 2016–2019 ..................................................27 Table 2.2. Coverage of the State pension system, 2015–2018 ......................................29 Table 2.3. Formal and informal employment, 2017 ........................................................31 Table 3.1. Pension Fund budget of Ukraine, 2015–2019..............................................41 Table 3.2. Key financial indicators of the Pension Fund, 2015–2018 ........................43 Table 3.3. Key macroeconomic indicators, 2015–2018.................................................45 Table 3.4. Key economic assumptions, 2020–2050 ........................................................45 Table 3.5. Key demographic assumptions by three variants, 2020–2050 ...................46 Table 3.6. Projected population by sex and age group, 2020–2050 (low variant) ...................................................................................47 Table 3.7. Projected number of insured persons and contributors by sex, 2020–2050 ............................................................................................................48 Table 3.8. Projected number of pensioners by sex and type, 2020–2050...................49 Table 3.9. Projected average replacement rates by sex and type of pension, 2020–2050 ............................................................................................................50
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS UKRAINE Second Review
    ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Committee on Environmental Policy ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS UKRAINE Second Review UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2007 Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 24 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. ECE/CEP/133 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. 07.II.E.6 ISBN 978-92-1-116958-4 ISSN 1020-4563 iii Foreword Environmental Performance Reviews (EPRs) for countries in transition were initiated by Environment Ministers at the second “Environment for Europe” Conference in Lucerne, Switzerland in 1993. As a result, the UNECE Committee on Environmental Policy decided to make the EPRs a part of its regular programme. Ten years later, at the fifth Ministerial Conference “Environment for Europe” (Kiev, 2003), the Ministers confirmed that the UNECE programme of EPRs had made it possible to assess the effectiveness of the efforts of countries with economies in transition to manage their environment. The Programme has addressed tailor-made recommendations to the Governments concerned on improving environmental management to reduce their pollution load, to better integrate environmental policies into sectoral policies and to strengthen cooperation with the international community. The Ministers also reaffirmed their support for the EPR programme as an important instrument for countries with economies in transition, and they decided that the programme should proceed with a second cycle of reviews.
    [Show full text]
  • UNHCR/GFK Desk Research of the Surveys of Idps
    DESK RESEARCH OF THE SURVEYS OF IDPs PREPARED FOR UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES (UNHCR) Prepared by: Inna Volosevych, Head of Department for Social and Political Research [email protected] Tetiana Kostiuchenko, Senior Researcher, Department for Social and Political Research [email protected] December, 2017 Table of contents: Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Glossary .................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Key findings ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 Main gaps in IDP surveys ...................................................................................................................................... 9 1. Methodology ................................................................................................................................................ 11 1.1 Research objectives and design ...................................................................................................................... 11 1.2. Methodological problems which occur
    [Show full text]
  • Resilient Ukraine Resilient
    Resilient Ukraine: Safeguarding Society from Russian Aggression Russian from Society Ukraine: Safeguarding Resilient Research Paper Mathieu Boulègue and Orysia Lutsevych Ukraine Forum | June 2020 Resilient Ukraine Safeguarding Society from Russian Aggression Mathieu Boulègue and OrysiaLutsevych Chatham House Contents Summary 2 1 Introduction 3 2 The Impact of the Armed Conflict 13 3 Creating Resilience Dividends: Case Studies 27 4 Recommendations 33 5 Conclusion 37 About the Authors 38 Acknowledgments 39 1 | Chatham House Resilient Ukraine: Safeguarding Society from Russian Aggression Summary • Despite military conflict and an increasingly adversarial relationship with Russia, Ukraine has largely maintained its democratic reforms thanks to its resilience and determination to decide its own future. The country is gradually developing the capacity of its state institutions and civil society to address the political and social consequences of Russian aggression. • Russia’s three main levers of influence in Ukraine include the ongoing armed conflict, corruption, and the poor quality of the political sphere. The Kremlin seeks to exploit these vulnerabilities to promote polarization and encourage a clash between Ukraine’s citizens and its governing elite by taking military action, manipulating the corruption narrative, supporting pro-Russia parties, and fuelling religious tensions through the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC). • The ramifications of the military operation in Donbas reverberate strongly across the country and domestic politics. The most prominent spillover effects include the circulation of firearms and the weakened capacity of authorities to reintegrate internally displaced people (IDPs) and war veterans. • With no clear way to end the armed conflict, there is a growing risk of societal polarization. This could have negative consequences for any prospective peace agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens and the State in the Government-Controlled Territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk Regions Problems, Challenges and Visions of the Future
    Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future Funded by: This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union through International Alert. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of International Alert and UCIPR and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. Layout: Nick Wilmot Creative Front cover image: A mother and daughter living in temporary accommodation for those displaced by the violence in Donetsk, 2014. © Andrew McConnell/Panos © International Alert/Ukrainian Center for Independent Political Research 2017 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future October 2017 2 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 2. Methodology 6 3. Findings 7 4. Statements from interviewees 22 5. Conclusions and recommendations 30 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions 3 1. INTRODUCTION The demarcation line (the line of contact)1 and the ‘grey zone’ between the government-controlled2 and uncontrolled territories3 of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions separates the parties to the conflict in the east of Ukraine. The areas controlled by the Ukrainian authorities and bordering the ‘grey zone’ are very politically sensitive, highly militarised, and fall under a special governance regime that is different from the rest of the country. In the absence of a comprehensive political settlement and amid uncertain prospects, it is unclear how long this situation will remain. It is highly likely that over the next few years, Ukrainians in areas adjacent to the contact line will live under very particular and unusual governance structures, and in varying degrees of danger.
    [Show full text]
  • RESTRICTED GPA/ACC/UKR/13 28 October 2014 (14-6259) Page
    RESTRICTED GPA/ACC/UKR/13 28 October 2014 (14-6259) Page: 1/12 Committee on Government Procurement Original: English ACCESSION TO THE AGREEMENT ON GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT OF UKRAINE COMMUNICATION FROM UKRAINE Second Revised offer The following communication, dated 27 October 2014, is being circulated at the request of the Delegation of Ukraine. _______________ GPA/ACC/UKR/13 - 2 - SECOND REVISED APPENDIX I OFFER OF UKRAINE1 ANNEX 1 CENTRAL GOVERNMENT ENTITIES Threshold: Goods (specified in Annex 4) SDR 130,000 Services (specified in Annex 5) SDR 130,000 Construction Services (specified in Annex 6) SDR 5,000,000 List of Entities: 1. Bodies, authorized by the Parliament of Ukraine, President of Ukraine and Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine to administrate their activity. 2. Ministries, other central bodies of the executive branch, governmental bodies created in the system of the central bodies of the executive branch. 3. The Constitutional court of Ukraine, the Supreme court of Ukraine and higher specialized courts. 4. Institutions and organizations which are defined by the Constitution of Ukraine or being a part of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, as well as, the bodies specially authorized by the law to carry out intelligence activities, and bodies, institutions and organizations which are classified as the main spending units of state budget funds, according to the Ukrainian legislation (e.g. the National bank, Anti-monopoly Committee, Prosecutor General's Office of Ukraine, Accounting Chamber, etc.). 5. National academy of sciences of Ukraine and pectoral academies of sciences. 6. Other budget entities which are subordinated to listed entities and financed by state budgets.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Issues in Pension System Reform in Ukraine
    USAID FINANCIAL SECTOR TRANSFORMATION PROJECT KEY ISSUES IN PENSION SYSTEM REFORM IN UKRAINE August 2018 This report is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID.) The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of USAID Financial Sector Transformation Project, being implemented by DAI Global LLC, and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. CONTENTS Glossary of key terms ..................................................................................................... 4 Preface ........................................................................................................................... 6 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 7 2 Principles and Factors for Pension Reform Consideration ........................................ 10 3 Pension Benefit Adequacy or Social Sustainability ................................................... 14 4 Coverage Challenge in Today’s Labor Market .......................................................... 16 5 Addressing the Gender Gap in Pensions ................................................................. 17 6 Pension Benefits Adjustment Mechanisms ............................................................... 18 7 Defining Financial Sustainability ............................................................................... 19 8 The Government Pension System Modernization
    [Show full text]
  • Maintained 156 Types of Subsidies and Social Payments That Were Directed to 236 Different Population Groups (See 4)
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Góra, Marek; Rohozynsky, Oleksandr Research Report Restructuring and social safety nets in Russia and Ukraine - social security influence on labor mobility: Possible opportunities and challenges CASE Network Studies & Analyses, No. 397 Provided in Cooperation with: Center for Social and Economic Research (CASE), Warsaw Suggested Citation: Góra, Marek; Rohozynsky, Oleksandr (2009) : Restructuring and social safety nets in Russia and Ukraine - social security influence on labor mobility: Possible opportunities and challenges, CASE Network Studies & Analyses, No. 397, Center for Social and Economic Research (CASE), Warsaw This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/128196 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu CASE Network Studies & Analyses No.397- Restructuring and Social Safety Nets in ..
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Ukraine's Policy and Legal Framework Related to the Rights of Older People to Social Protection in the Light Of
    Assessment of Ukraine’s policy and legal framework related to the rights of older people to social protection in the light of article 23 of the Revised European Social Charter Prepared by Ms Ivana Roagna, International Expert Ms Olena Ivanova, National Expert Ms Yana Simutina, National Expert October 2020 Table of content List of abbreviations ................................................................................................................................ 4 Executive summary ................................................................................................................................. 5 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 7 1. Background information ...................................................................................................................... 7 2. Methodology ....................................................................................................................................... 8 3. How to use this Report: structure and recommendations................................................................. 10 Part I ...................................................................................................................................................... 11 International legal and policy framework relevant to older people ...................................................... 11 4. Ukraine and the European Social Charter .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Policy Challenges for Social Security Systems in Russia and Ukraine
    The views and opinions expressed here reflect the authors’ point of view and not necessarily those of CASE Network. The report was prepared within a project on Economic and Social Conse- quences of Industrial Restructuring in Russia and Ukraine (ESCIRRU) carried out under the FP6 (Sixth Framework Program) and financed by DG Research. The project was led by the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin – German Institute for Economic Research) and partners from across the EU as well as Russia and the Ukraine. The report summarizes the results of the Workpackage WP8 – DP1on Social security, labour market and restructuring: Current situation and expected outcomes of reforms coordinated by CASE – Center for Social and Economic Research. The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of the authors and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union or any other institutions the authors may be affiliated to. Keywords: Social safety net, labour market, transitional economies JEL: E24, H55, J31, J21, J23, P2 © CASE – Center for Social and Economic Research, Warsaw, 2009 Graphic Design: Agnieszka Natalia Bury EAN 9788371785030 Publisher: CASE-Center for Social and Economic Research on behalf of CASE Network 12 Sienkiewicza, 00-010 Warsaw, Poland tel.: (48 22) 622 66 27, fax: (48 22) 828 60 69 e-mail: [email protected] http://www.case-research.eu The CASE Network is a group of economic and social research centers in Po- land, Kyrgyzstan, Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova, and Belarus. Organizations in the network regularly conduct joint research and advisory projects. The research cov- ers a wide spectrum of economic and social issues, including economic effects of the European integration process, economic relations between the EU and CIS, monetary policy and euro-accession, innovation and competitiveness, and labour markets and social policy.
    [Show full text]
  • ESCIRRU Working Paper No. 25 Pension Reform Options for Russia
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Research Papers in Economics ESCIRRU Working Paper No. 25 Pension reform options for Russia and Ukraine: A critical analysis of available options and their expected outcomes Marek Góra (Warsaw School of Economics and CASE) Oleksandr Rohozynsky (CASE) Oxana Sinyavskaya (CASE) Berlin, February 2010 ESCIRRU A European Research Project Funded by the 6th Framework Programme and Managed by DIW Berlin DP4. Pension reform options for Russia and Ukraine: A critical analysis of available options and their expected outcomes (with a focus on labour market, industrial restructuring and public finance) Marek Góra, Oleksandr Rohozynsky, Oxana Sinyavskaya Jel codes: H53, H55, H69, J11, J18, J32, J 38, P36. Table of Contents Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................ 3 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 4 General background .................................................................................................................. 6 Demographic and economic issues ........................................................................................... 7 Transition and economic development .......................................................................... 7 Russia ................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Usaid/Ukraine Mid-Term Performance Evaluation of the Financial Sector Transformation (Fst) Activity Evaluation Report (Updated10.22.2019)
    USAID/UKRAINE MID-TERM PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE FINANCIAL SECTOR TRANSFORMATION (FST) ACTIVITY EVALUATION REPORT (UPDATED10.22.2019) 1 September 2019 This report is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this report were prepared by IBI under IDQ No. 7200AA18D00011, Task Order No. 72012119F00002. The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of IBI and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government 2 CONTENTS ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................................ 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 6 FINDINGS/CONCLUSIONS................................................................................................................ 6 RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................................................... 8 ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................................. 10 INTRODUCTION AND PROGRAMMING CONTEXT ...................................................... 10 EVALUATION PURPOSE AND EVALUATION QUESTIONS ...................................... 11 KEY QUESTIONS ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Modernization of the Pension System in Ukraine
    Course code: BE300E Name / Candidate no.: Olha Kuchevska / 6 Modernization of the pension system in Ukraine Date: 19 May 2019 Total number of pages: 88 Abstract Since the 1990s, many countries have faced the problem of aging, which has led to more profound problems associated with the provision of normal retirement benefits; governments have begun reforming their pension systems by creating multi-pillar systems. Ukraine is also on the list of these states; during the last 15 years, there have been many attempts to introduce a three-pillar pension system, but they were unsuccessful. Therefore, there is a need to investigate the problems of the process of modernizing the Ukrainian pension system in terms of the role and influence of actors on the process of developing and implementing pension reforms and how it affects the state of the pension system. The purpose of this study is to identify and investigate how the reform of the pension system affects the state of the pension system. Also, in the course of the study, the content and components of past pension reforms in Ukraine will be revealed, the need and expediency of those changes, and the change in the trajectory and goal of reforms in the development and implementation process; historical institutionalism and discursive institutionalism are theoretical framework for the research, since they explain the role of discourse and ideas in the process of development and evolution of the pension system. The empirical findings are based on data from eight interviews conducted with experts involved in the development of pension reforms as well as on secondary data.
    [Show full text]