DOCSLIB.ORG

Usaid/Ukraine Mid-Term Performance Evaluation of the Financial Sector Transformation (Fst) Activity Evaluation Report (Updated10.22.2019)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Usaid/Ukraine Mid-Term Performance Evaluation of the Financial Sector Transformation (Fst) Activity Evaluation Report (Updated10.22.2019) USAID/UKRAINE MID-TERM PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE FINANCIAL SECTOR TRANSFORMATION (FST) ACTIVITY EVALUATION REPORT (UPDATED10.22.2019) 1 September 2019 This report is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this report were prepared by IBI under IDQ No. 7200AA18D00011, Task Order No. 72012119F00002. The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of IBI and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government 2 CONTENTS ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................................ 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 6 FINDINGS/CONCLUSIONS................................................................................................................ 6 RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................................................... 8 ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................................. 10 INTRODUCTION AND PROGRAMMING CONTEXT ...................................................... 10 EVALUATION PURPOSE AND EVALUATION QUESTIONS ...................................... 11 KEY QUESTIONS ................................................................................................................................... 11 EVALUATION APPROACH AND LIMITATIONS ............................................................... 11 EVALUATION APPROACH ..................................................................................................................................................... 12 EVALUATION LIMITATIONS ................................................................................................................................................ 13 FINDINGS/CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................ 14 EVALUATION QUESTION 1: IN WHAT WAYS HAS FST CONTRIBUTED TO BUILDING AND ADVANCING CONFIDENCE IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR? HOW SUCCESSFUL WERE THESE EFFORTS? ....................................................................................................................................................... 14 Sub-Component A: Increased Public Confidence In, Understanding, and Use of Financial System ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Sub-Component B: Transformed Non-Banking Financial Sector Regulatory Environment 17 Sub-Component C: Increased Financial Inclusion and Expanded Digital Finance Solutions18 Sub-Component D: Balanced and Sustainable Pension System............................................................ 18 EVALUATION QUESTION 2: TO WHAT EXTENT DID FST AFFECT SMES’ AND MARGINALIZED GROUPS ACCESS TO FINANCE? ........................................................................ 19 EVALUATION QUESTION 3: TO WHAT EXTENT DID FST CHANGE THE WAYS IN WHICH FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND FINANCIAL CONSUMERS COMMUNICATE? ................ 20 EVALUATION QUESTION 4: WHAT WERE THE UNINTENDED EFFECTS OF THE FST ACTIVITY? ...................................................................................................................................................... 21 EVALUATION QUESTION 5: IN WHAT AREAS RELATED TO FST’S SCOPE IS USAID ASSISTANCE NO LONGER NEEDED? ................................................................................................. 22 RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................................................... 22 CURRENT ACTIVITIES: .............................................................................................................................. 23 FUTURE ACTIVITIES: .................................................................................................................................. 24 ANNEX A: SCOPE OF WORK ............................................................................................................... 25 ANNEX B: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... 26 ANNEX C: EVALUATION INSTRUMENTS .......................................................................................... 33 ANNEX D: KEY INFORMANTS ............................................................................................................. 40 ANNEX E: DOCUMENTS REVIEWED ................................................................................................. 43 ANNEX F: EVALUATION TEAM ........................................................................................................... 45 3 ANNEX G: CONFLICT OF INTEREST FORMS ..................................................................................... 46 ANNEX H: WORK PLAN ................................................................................................................ 50 TABLE OF CONTENT .......................................................................................................................... I ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................................ II INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 1 EVALUATION OBJECTIVES AND KEY QUESTIONS ................................................................. 1 Key Questions ................................................................................................................................................. 1 TECHNICAL APPROACH ................................................................................................................... 2 Data Collection and Analysis Methods ...................................................................................................... 2 Data Management and Security ................................................................................................................... 3 Data Analysis Methods................................................................................................................................... 3 Potential Evaluation Limitations ................................................................................................................... 5 TEAM COMPOSITION AND RESPONSIBILITIES ......................................................................... 6 Timeline ............................................................................................................................................................. 6 Draft Deliverables Schedule and Work Plan ...................................................................................................................... 6 ANNEX A: STATEMENT OF WORK .............................................................................................. 1 ANNEX B: DRAFT INSTRUMENTS.................................................................................................. 3 ANNEX C: PRELIMINARY KEY INFORMANT LIST .................................................................... 7 4 ACRONYMS CDCS Country Development Cooperation Strategy CSO Civil Society Organization DGF Deposit Guarantee Fund EQ Evaluation Question ET Evaluation Team EU European Union FGD Focus Group Discussion FSR National Commission for State Regulation of Financial Services Market (commonly referred to as the Financial Services Regulator) FST Financial Sector Transformation FY Fiscal Year GOU Government of Ukraine IBI International Business Initiatives KII Key Informant Interview MEL Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning MSI Management Systems International NABU Independent Association of Ukrainian Banks NBU National Bank of Ukraine NSSMC National Securities and Stock Market Commission PFU Pension Fund of Ukraine PMP Performance Management Plan SMEs Small and Medium Enterprises TA Technical Assistance UNDP United Nations Development Program USAID United States Agency for International Development WB World Bank 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Economic growth programming is a complex and integral part of USAID’s technical assistance to Ukraine, in addition to issues of corruption, democratic governance, and conflict mitigation. Post- Euromaidan reform initiatives resulted in a multi-stakeholder plan, Comprehensive Program for Financial Sector Development of Ukraine Until 2020, which laid out key restructuring goals for the NBU and other elements of the financial sector. USAID’s FST activity, implemented by DAI in partnership with key Government of Ukraine (GOU) agencies, industry associations, civil society organizations, and the private sector, works to transform the financial sector into a transparent, fair, and diversified system that supports firms and consumers. The original design of FST was built on assumptions about legislative progress coming out of the Comprehensive Program, but much of the financial sector reform agenda stalled in Verkhovna Rada. FST was intended to be a flexible project in order to respond to changing context, and so became over time a large and wide-ranging project
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS UKRAINE Second Review
    ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Committee on Environmental Policy ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS UKRAINE Second Review UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2007 Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 24 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. ECE/CEP/133 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. 07.II.E.6 ISBN 978-92-1-116958-4 ISSN 1020-4563 iii Foreword Environmental Performance Reviews (EPRs) for countries in transition were initiated by Environment Ministers at the second “Environment for Europe” Conference in Lucerne, Switzerland in 1993. As a result, the UNECE Committee on Environmental Policy decided to make the EPRs a part of its regular programme. Ten years later, at the fifth Ministerial Conference “Environment for Europe” (Kiev, 2003), the Ministers confirmed that the UNECE programme of EPRs had made it possible to assess the effectiveness of the efforts of countries with economies in transition to manage their environment. The Programme has addressed tailor-made recommendations to the Governments concerned on improving environmental management to reduce their pollution load, to better integrate environmental policies into sectoral policies and to strengthen cooperation with the international community. The Ministers also reaffirmed their support for the EPR programme as an important instrument for countries with economies in transition, and they decided that the programme should proceed with a second cycle of reviews.
    [Show full text]
  • UNHCR/GFK Desk Research of the Surveys of Idps
    DESK RESEARCH OF THE SURVEYS OF IDPs PREPARED FOR UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES (UNHCR) Prepared by: Inna Volosevych, Head of Department for Social and Political Research [email protected] Tetiana Kostiuchenko, Senior Researcher, Department for Social and Political Research [email protected] December, 2017 Table of contents: Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Glossary .................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Key findings ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 Main gaps in IDP surveys ...................................................................................................................................... 9 1. Methodology ................................................................................................................................................ 11 1.1 Research objectives and design ...................................................................................................................... 11 1.2. Methodological problems which occur
    [Show full text]
  • Resilient Ukraine Resilient
    Resilient Ukraine: Safeguarding Society from Russian Aggression Russian from Society Ukraine: Safeguarding Resilient Research Paper Mathieu Boulègue and Orysia Lutsevych Ukraine Forum | June 2020 Resilient Ukraine Safeguarding Society from Russian Aggression Mathieu Boulègue and OrysiaLutsevych Chatham House Contents Summary 2 1 Introduction 3 2 The Impact of the Armed Conflict 13 3 Creating Resilience Dividends: Case Studies 27 4 Recommendations 33 5 Conclusion 37 About the Authors 38 Acknowledgments 39 1 | Chatham House Resilient Ukraine: Safeguarding Society from Russian Aggression Summary • Despite military conflict and an increasingly adversarial relationship with Russia, Ukraine has largely maintained its democratic reforms thanks to its resilience and determination to decide its own future. The country is gradually developing the capacity of its state institutions and civil society to address the political and social consequences of Russian aggression. • Russia’s three main levers of influence in Ukraine include the ongoing armed conflict, corruption, and the poor quality of the political sphere. The Kremlin seeks to exploit these vulnerabilities to promote polarization and encourage a clash between Ukraine’s citizens and its governing elite by taking military action, manipulating the corruption narrative, supporting pro-Russia parties, and fuelling religious tensions through the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC). • The ramifications of the military operation in Donbas reverberate strongly across the country and domestic politics. The most prominent spillover effects include the circulation of firearms and the weakened capacity of authorities to reintegrate internally displaced people (IDPs) and war veterans. • With no clear way to end the armed conflict, there is a growing risk of societal polarization. This could have negative consequences for any prospective peace agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens and the State in the Government-Controlled Territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk Regions Problems, Challenges and Visions of the Future
    Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future Funded by: This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union through International Alert. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of International Alert and UCIPR and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. Layout: Nick Wilmot Creative Front cover image: A mother and daughter living in temporary accommodation for those displaced by the violence in Donetsk, 2014. © Andrew McConnell/Panos © International Alert/Ukrainian Center for Independent Political Research 2017 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future October 2017 2 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 2. Methodology 6 3. Findings 7 4. Statements from interviewees 22 5. Conclusions and recommendations 30 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions 3 1. INTRODUCTION The demarcation line (the line of contact)1 and the ‘grey zone’ between the government-controlled2 and uncontrolled territories3 of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions separates the parties to the conflict in the east of Ukraine. The areas controlled by the Ukrainian authorities and bordering the ‘grey zone’ are very politically sensitive, highly militarised, and fall under a special governance regime that is different from the rest of the country. In the absence of a comprehensive political settlement and amid uncertain prospects, it is unclear how long this situation will remain. It is highly likely that over the next few years, Ukrainians in areas adjacent to the contact line will live under very particular and unusual governance structures, and in varying degrees of danger.
    [Show full text]
  • RESTRICTED GPA/ACC/UKR/13 28 October 2014 (14-6259) Page
    RESTRICTED GPA/ACC/UKR/13 28 October 2014 (14-6259) Page: 1/12 Committee on Government Procurement Original: English ACCESSION TO THE AGREEMENT ON GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT OF UKRAINE COMMUNICATION FROM UKRAINE Second Revised offer The following communication, dated 27 October 2014, is being circulated at the request of the Delegation of Ukraine. _______________ GPA/ACC/UKR/13 - 2 - SECOND REVISED APPENDIX I OFFER OF UKRAINE1 ANNEX 1 CENTRAL GOVERNMENT ENTITIES Threshold: Goods (specified in Annex 4) SDR 130,000 Services (specified in Annex 5) SDR 130,000 Construction Services (specified in Annex 6) SDR 5,000,000 List of Entities: 1. Bodies, authorized by the Parliament of Ukraine, President of Ukraine and Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine to administrate their activity. 2. Ministries, other central bodies of the executive branch, governmental bodies created in the system of the central bodies of the executive branch. 3. The Constitutional court of Ukraine, the Supreme court of Ukraine and higher specialized courts. 4. Institutions and organizations which are defined by the Constitution of Ukraine or being a part of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, as well as, the bodies specially authorized by the law to carry out intelligence activities, and bodies, institutions and organizations which are classified as the main spending units of state budget funds, according to the Ukrainian legislation (e.g. the National bank, Anti-monopoly Committee, Prosecutor General's Office of Ukraine, Accounting Chamber, etc.). 5. National academy of sciences of Ukraine and pectoral academies of sciences. 6. Other budget entities which are subordinated to listed entities and financed by state budgets.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Issues in Pension System Reform in Ukraine
    USAID FINANCIAL SECTOR TRANSFORMATION PROJECT KEY ISSUES IN PENSION SYSTEM REFORM IN UKRAINE August 2018 This report is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID.) The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of USAID Financial Sector Transformation Project, being implemented by DAI Global LLC, and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. CONTENTS Glossary of key terms ..................................................................................................... 4 Preface ........................................................................................................................... 6 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 7 2 Principles and Factors for Pension Reform Consideration ........................................ 10 3 Pension Benefit Adequacy or Social Sustainability ................................................... 14 4 Coverage Challenge in Today’s Labor Market .......................................................... 16 5 Addressing the Gender Gap in Pensions ................................................................. 17 6 Pension Benefits Adjustment Mechanisms ............................................................... 18 7 Defining Financial Sustainability ............................................................................... 19 8 The Government Pension System Modernization
    [Show full text]
  • Maintained 156 Types of Subsidies and Social Payments That Were Directed to 236 Different Population Groups (See 4)
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Góra, Marek; Rohozynsky, Oleksandr Research Report Restructuring and social safety nets in Russia and Ukraine - social security influence on labor mobility: Possible opportunities and challenges CASE Network Studies & Analyses, No. 397 Provided in Cooperation with: Center for Social and Economic Research (CASE), Warsaw Suggested Citation: Góra, Marek; Rohozynsky, Oleksandr (2009) : Restructuring and social safety nets in Russia and Ukraine - social security influence on labor mobility: Possible opportunities and challenges, CASE Network Studies & Analyses, No. 397, Center for Social and Economic Research (CASE), Warsaw This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/128196 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu CASE Network Studies & Analyses No.397- Restructuring and Social Safety Nets in ..
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Ukraine's Policy and Legal Framework Related to the Rights of Older People to Social Protection in the Light Of
    Assessment of Ukraine’s policy and legal framework related to the rights of older people to social protection in the light of article 23 of the Revised European Social Charter Prepared by Ms Ivana Roagna, International Expert Ms Olena Ivanova, National Expert Ms Yana Simutina, National Expert October 2020 Table of content List of abbreviations ................................................................................................................................ 4 Executive summary ................................................................................................................................. 5 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 7 1. Background information ...................................................................................................................... 7 2. Methodology ....................................................................................................................................... 8 3. How to use this Report: structure and recommendations................................................................. 10 Part I ...................................................................................................................................................... 11 International legal and policy framework relevant to older people ...................................................... 11 4. Ukraine and the European Social Charter .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Policy Challenges for Social Security Systems in Russia and Ukraine
    The views and opinions expressed here reflect the authors’ point of view and not necessarily those of CASE Network. The report was prepared within a project on Economic and Social Conse- quences of Industrial Restructuring in Russia and Ukraine (ESCIRRU) carried out under the FP6 (Sixth Framework Program) and financed by DG Research. The project was led by the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin – German Institute for Economic Research) and partners from across the EU as well as Russia and the Ukraine. The report summarizes the results of the Workpackage WP8 – DP1on Social security, labour market and restructuring: Current situation and expected outcomes of reforms coordinated by CASE – Center for Social and Economic Research. The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of the authors and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union or any other institutions the authors may be affiliated to. Keywords: Social safety net, labour market, transitional economies JEL: E24, H55, J31, J21, J23, P2 © CASE – Center for Social and Economic Research, Warsaw, 2009 Graphic Design: Agnieszka Natalia Bury EAN 9788371785030 Publisher: CASE-Center for Social and Economic Research on behalf of CASE Network 12 Sienkiewicza, 00-010 Warsaw, Poland tel.: (48 22) 622 66 27, fax: (48 22) 828 60 69 e-mail: [email protected] http://www.case-research.eu The CASE Network is a group of economic and social research centers in Po- land, Kyrgyzstan, Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova, and Belarus. Organizations in the network regularly conduct joint research and advisory projects. The research cov- ers a wide spectrum of economic and social issues, including economic effects of the European integration process, economic relations between the EU and CIS, monetary policy and euro-accession, innovation and competitiveness, and labour markets and social policy.
    [Show full text]
  • ESCIRRU Working Paper No. 25 Pension Reform Options for Russia
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Research Papers in Economics ESCIRRU Working Paper No. 25 Pension reform options for Russia and Ukraine: A critical analysis of available options and their expected outcomes Marek Góra (Warsaw School of Economics and CASE) Oleksandr Rohozynsky (CASE) Oxana Sinyavskaya (CASE) Berlin, February 2010 ESCIRRU A European Research Project Funded by the 6th Framework Programme and Managed by DIW Berlin DP4. Pension reform options for Russia and Ukraine: A critical analysis of available options and their expected outcomes (with a focus on labour market, industrial restructuring and public finance) Marek Góra, Oleksandr Rohozynsky, Oxana Sinyavskaya Jel codes: H53, H55, H69, J11, J18, J32, J 38, P36. Table of Contents Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................ 3 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 4 General background .................................................................................................................. 6 Demographic and economic issues ........................................................................................... 7 Transition and economic development .......................................................................... 7 Russia ................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Modernization of the Pension System in Ukraine
    Course code: BE300E Name / Candidate no.: Olha Kuchevska / 6 Modernization of the pension system in Ukraine Date: 19 May 2019 Total number of pages: 88 Abstract Since the 1990s, many countries have faced the problem of aging, which has led to more profound problems associated with the provision of normal retirement benefits; governments have begun reforming their pension systems by creating multi-pillar systems. Ukraine is also on the list of these states; during the last 15 years, there have been many attempts to introduce a three-pillar pension system, but they were unsuccessful. Therefore, there is a need to investigate the problems of the process of modernizing the Ukrainian pension system in terms of the role and influence of actors on the process of developing and implementing pension reforms and how it affects the state of the pension system. The purpose of this study is to identify and investigate how the reform of the pension system affects the state of the pension system. Also, in the course of the study, the content and components of past pension reforms in Ukraine will be revealed, the need and expediency of those changes, and the change in the trajectory and goal of reforms in the development and implementation process; historical institutionalism and discursive institutionalism are theoretical framework for the research, since they explain the role of discourse and ideas in the process of development and evolution of the pension system. The empirical findings are based on data from eight interviews conducted with experts involved in the development of pension reforms as well as on secondary data.
    [Show full text]
  • Pillar II Pension System Development CONCEPT National Securities and Stock Market Commission
    Pillar II Pension System Development CONCEPT National Securities and Stock Market Commission DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION This concept is consistent with the globally accepted IOPS (International Organization of Pension Supervisors) principles Prerequisites for Pillar II Implementation in Ukraine To ensure the enhancement of current pension provision for citizens, Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine by the Law #2148-VIII set requirements of necessity for cumulative pension provisions. Starting from January, 1 , 2019, such contributions will be obliged simultaneously with the payments to the pay-as-you-go system. The following changes to financial market legislation must be made before Pillar 2 is launched #DraftLaw2413а Consolidating the Pillar 2 entities Currently, such functions are divided between two regulators: the National Securities supervision and control functions and Stock Market Commission (NSSMC) and the National Commission for State 01 under NSSMC Regulation of Financial Services Markets (FSR). #DraftLaw6303 Strengthening the institutional To supervise Pillar 2 entities and ensure effective protection of pension system capacity of NSSMC as a market participants, as well as to prevent capital market abuse, an institutionally capable 02 regulator regulator is needed. The Ukrainian Parliament must consider and pass these bills before Pillar 2 is launched CONTENTS 01 International experience of Pillar 2 implementation 02 Principles of Pillar 2 development in Ukraine 03 Useful information about Pillar 2 in other countries 04 Macroeconomic forecasts concerning Ukraine and Pillar 2 scale estimates International Experience of Pillar 2 Implementation Prerequisites for Pillar II Implementation in Ukraine The following changes to financial market legislation must be made before Pillar 2 is launched Objective Proportionality and Consistence National laws must set a clear and unambiguous objective for Pension supervisors must strive for the proportionality of actions pension supervisors and determine their specific responsibilities.
    [Show full text]