February 08 LE&T News

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN FEBRUARY 2008 PUBLISHED BY THENEWS BLET, A DIVISION OF THE RAIL CONFERENCE, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS What has the BLET done for me lately? Often overlooked, fringe benefits an important part of compensation BLET provides its members It’s a familiar refrain: “What has the BLET done toward the dental plan, and $121.92 per member, per The money values set forth in this study are com- for me lately?” The answer is quite a lot. year for the vision plan. puted on costs actually known as of January 2008, BLET collective bargaining agreements provide “Our medical benefits are among the best in the and the estimated value of fringe benefits accruing our members with some of the highest blue collar country,” BLET President Don Hahs said. “Our mem- to operating employees is based on annual wages of wages in the United States, and also include impor- bers deserve every penny of this fringe benefit.” $75,900 to $102,000, which are the maximum Tier 2 tant work rules that ensure our members’ safety on These fringe benefits also extend to Railroad Re- and Tier 1 Railroad Retirement taxes, respectively. duty. tirement payments. In fact, nearly half of the $31, It should also be noted that the study does not Often overlooked — but just as important — are 282.02 that BLET members receive each year in fringe take in to consideration vacations, holidays and other the fringe benefits provided to BLET members as part benefits goes toward Railroad Retirement payments. time off benefits, which vary by railroad, class of ser- of the Brotherhood’s collective bargaining agree- For each Class 1 railroad worker covered by the vice and seniority. ments. National Contract, rail carriers will contribute $6,324 “I am proud of the contracts negotiated by the In 2008, BLET members on average will receive per year in Railroad Retirement Tier 1 taxes and an BLET,” President Hahs said. “Railroad jobs are good more than $31,000 in fringe benefits, according to the additional $9,183.90 per year in Railroad Retirement jobs — the kind of jobs you can depend on to raise a BLET’s 2008 Fringe Benefit Study. Tier 2 taxes. That’s a total of $15,507.90. (As a side family. The wages and work rules are just as impor- The rail carriers will pay an average of $12,919.32 note, the same railroad workers will each pay $6,324 tant as the fringe benefits. So the next time someone toward membership health care benefits — that’s per year in Tier 1 taxes and $2,960.10 in Tier 2 taxes.) asks, ‘What has the union done for me lately?’, you $12,919.32 per member working under the National “Our Railroad Retirement system is strong and can point them to this study and show what the BLET Contract. healthy, and I hope it’ll be that way for generations is doing every day to provide its hard working mem- This does not include what the carriers’ contrib- to come,” President Hahs said. “As economists pro- bers with decent jobs and decent benefits.” ute toward the retirees’ health care plan, which is an vide a dire forecast for Social Security, it is good to Members may download the 2008 Fringe Benefits additional $1,331.76 per member, per year. It also does know that our members can depend on the reliabil- report from the BLET website at: not include benefits of $548.64 per member, per year ity of Railroad Retirement.” http://www.ble-t.org/FringeBenefits2008.pdf • Teamsters endorse Barack Members at Huron & Eastern short Obama for President line ratify first BLET agreement Teamsters General Presi- local union and joint council dent Jim Hoffa announced on leaders and deliberations by Members of the Broth- sentative on May 11, 2006, crease of 3% per year in- February 20 that the union is the union’s democratically erhood of Locomotive Engi- workers at the Huron & East- stead of 2%. endorsing Sen. Barack Obama elected General Executive neers and Trainmen have ern were non-union “at will” Members also will re- for president. The endorse- Board. ratified their first-ever col- employees. ceive back pay in the form ment is the first step in mobi- “We have been fortunate to lective bargaining agree- Dan Lorenz, Local Chair- of profit sharing payments lizing the union’s 1.4 million have candidates throughout ment with the Huron & East- man of Division 327, said the that were withheld during members and their families to the Democratic primary who ern Railroad, a RailAmerica new contract provides security negotiations. Lorenz said elect Obama. are friends of working families short line headquartered in for members. the negotiating process “Senator Obama under- and the Teamsters Union,” Vassar, Mich. “The big reason we orga- lasted between 18 and 24 stands the challenges working Hoffa said. “We are pleased The four-year agree- nized and wanted to get in a months, and during that people face every day,” Hoffa that all of the Democratic can- ment was ratified on Dec. union was to create a policy, time management withheld said. “He is the candidate in didates have focused on issues 17, 2007, and went into ef- structure and guidelines to profit sharing to use as a the best position to lead our of importance to working fect on January 1. The hold management account- bargaining chip at the nego- movement to restore the people, including wages, agreement covers approxi- able,” Lorenz said. “The new tiating table. Lorenz said American dream for working health care, retirement secu- mately 25 members and pro- contract gives us those protec- members will receive profit people in this country. Senator rity, fair trade and vides general wage in- tions.” sharing payments from six Obama will fight for better outsourcing.” creases of 2% per year (8% The contract contains a previous quarters, which wages, real health care reform, The union’s endorsement over the life of the contract) “work safe” provision that al- will total several thousand stronger retirement security, immediately activates the in addition to bonuses lows members to earn quar- dollars for some members. fair trade and an end to the union’s 50-state election pro- earned through the terly bonuses for avoiding Midway through the ne- outsourcing of good jobs. He gram, with special emphasis company’s profit sharing workplace injuries. Payments gotiating process, Rail understands the importance of on swing states. program. The agreement under the work safe program America was sold. The giving workers a voice at work “Senator Obama will stand provided a 3% wage in- are awarded on an individual transaction threw a monkey and will fight for strong unions with the Teamsters when it crease from December 17 to basis and could be as high as wrench into the negotiating to help rebuild America’s comes to fighting for working December 31, along with the $780 per quarter. process and delayed the fi- middle class.” families,” Hoffa said. “This en- annual 2% wage increase In terms of profit sharing, nal outcome. The endorsement decision dorsement begins a partner- that went into effect on members have the right to opt “This property took follows a meeting in Austin, ship to change America. To- January 1. out of the program if it does not longer than normal for us to Texas, between Hoffa and gether we will reinvent the po- Prior to selecting the meet their expectations. In lieu Obama, and completes a litical process and give a voice BLET as their designated of profit sharing, members See Huron & Eastern, Page 7 months-long process that in- to those who have been ignored collective bargaining repre- would earn a general wage in- cluded scientific polling of Teamster members, surveys of See Obama, Page 7 Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen • International Brotherhood of Teamsters Page 2 Locomotive Engineers & Trainmen News · February 2008 LAST RUNS Division 34’s John Claytor championed safety at CSX Brother John T. Claytor, a member Brother Claytor established SENSE of BLET Division 34 (Columbus, Ohio), teams with team captains. “Team mem- ended his long and safety-conscious bers could then feel freer to contact railroad career when he made his Last their team captain with any SENSE is- Run on December 27, 2007. sues,” he said. Brother Claytor’s Last Run came as Brother Claytor has been actively a Locomotive Engineer for CSX Trans- involved in the BLE’s transformation to portation on a trip between Willard, the BLET through his Local Chairman Ohio and Marion, Ohio, operating a responsibilities and as District SENSE MAC 70 engine on mixed manifest train Coordinator. As Local Chairman, No. Q349. He then worked third trick Brother Claytor started a newsletter for on yard job Y301 at Parson Yard in Co- his members to keep them informed of lumbus, Ohio, until his retirement be- important news and changes within the came effective on January 3, 2008. Brotherhood. Claytor hired out in Chillicothe, Upon his retirement, he was Ohio, as an operator-clerk for the Bal- awarded a 40-year service pin from timore & Ohio Railroad in 1967. He CSX and was recognized for his contri- went firing for the Chessie System on butions to safety. He has also received June 6, 1977, and earned promotion to a 30-year honor pin from the BLET. Locomotive Engineer for the Chessie in He served four years in the United September of 1977. Throughout his rail- States Navy. His home port was Jack- road career, he worked out of Newark, sonville, Fla., and he served on the air- Ohio, from 1987 to 1988, and then on craft carrier USS Shangri-la.
Recommended publications
  • Phase I National Gateway Clearance Initiative Documentation

    Phase I National Gateway Clearance Initiative Documentation

    Lead Agencies: Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f) Evaluation Cooperating Agencies: Phase I National Gateway Clearance Initiative epartment of Transportation Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C) September 7, 2010 Pennsylvania Department of Transportation West Virginia Department of Transportation Table of Contents 1. Summary 1 1.1 History of the Initiative 1 1.2 Logical Termini 7 1.3 Need and Purpose 9 1.4 Summary of Impacts and Mitigation 11 1.5 Agency Coordination and Public Involvement 18 1.5.1 Agency Coordination 18 1.5.2 Public Involvement 21 2. Need and Purpose of the Action 22 3. Context of the Action and Development of Alternatives 25 3.1 Overview 25 3.1.1 No Build Alternative 25 3.1.2 Proposed Action 26 3.2 Bridge Removal 26 3.3 Bridge Raising 27 3.4 Bridge Modification 27 3.5 Tunnel Liner Modification 28 3.6 Tunnel Open Cut 28 3.7 Excess Material Disposal 29 3.8 Grade Adjustment 29 3.9 Grade Crossing Closures/Modifications 30 3.10 Other Aspects 30 3.10.1 Interlocking 30 3.10.2 Modal Hubs 30 4. Impacts and Mitigation 31 4.1 Corridor-Wide Impacts 31 i Table of Contents 4.1.1 Right-of-Way 31 4.1.2 Community and Socio-Economic 31 4.1.2.1 Community Cohesion 31 4.1.2.2 Employment Opportunity 31 4.1.2.3 Environmental Justice 34 4.1.2.4 Public Health and Safety 35 4.1.3 Traffic 36 4.1.3.1 Maintenance of Traffic 36 4.1.3.2 Congestion Reduction 37 4.1.4 General Conformity Analysis 37 4.1.4.1 Regulatory Background 37 4.1.4.2 Evaluation 39 4.1.4.3 Construction Emissions 40 4.1.4.4 Conclusion
  • History of the Pere Marquette Railway

    History of the Pere Marquette Railway

    History of the Pere Marquette Railway Local History at the St. Thomas Public Library 1900: The Pere Marquette Railroad (PM) is formed by merging three small railroads in the United States: Chicago & West Michigan; Flint & Pere Marquette; and the Detroit, Grand Rapids & Western Railways. The PM is named after Père Jacques Marquette, the French Jesuit missionary who founded Michigan’s first European settlement, Sault St. Marie. 1901: Car ferry Pere Marquette 17 is placed in Lake Michigan service. The PM used car ferries on Lake Michigan to avoid the terminal and interchange delays in the area. Later, they were used on Lake Erie, the Detroit River, and in Port Huron. Car Ferry Pere Marquette 17 1902: Car ferry (first) Pere Marquette 18 is placed into Lake Michigan service. January 1903: PM acquires the Lake Erie & Detroit River Railway (LE&DRR), with main lines running from Walkerville, Windsor to St. Thomas, Ontario, as well as from Sarnia to Chatham and Erieau. This begins the Pere Marquette’s presence in Canada. 1904: The Pere Marquette secures running rights from Buffalo, New York and Niagara Falls, New York over the Canadian Southern railway lines to reach St. Thomas, where the PM’s main Canadian facilities will be located. 1905: Shop facilities are constructed in St. Thomas. December 1905: The first receivership begins, meaning that the company is controlled by others in order to make the best decision based on its finances, whether that is stabilizing or selling the company. The Pere Marquette has struggled financially for much of its operating life, and will continue to do so.
  • Great Lakes Maritime Institute

    Great Lakes Maritime Institute

    JANUARY - FEBRUARY, 1978 Volume XXVII; Number 1 GREAT LAKES MARITIME INSTITUTE DOSSIN GREAT LAKES MUSEUM Belle Isle, Detroit, Michigan 48207 JAN/FEB, 1978 Page 2 MEMBERSHIP NOTES Welcome to 1978! A brand new year, a brand new slate, and a brand new outlook. It is going to be difficult to keep up with the pace set in 1977, but the continued success of the Institute demands that we not just meet, but surpass last year. At the close of the year our member­ ship had grown to approaching 1,50C. pretty good for an organization that had 97 members in 1959...but this year we’ll shoot for 1,600. It’ll take a lot of work, and you’ll have to help, but you always have, so we should make it. Telescope production last year produced a total of 244 pages, and in addition to that we produced the FITZGERALD book with 60 pages. For the uninitiated, this means your Editor typed, then Varityped 608 pages. This much production takes a lot of time, but we are going to do something about it, and we’ll have an announcement to make perhaps as early as the next issue. Not only will what we have planned result in far less work to getting Telescope out, but it will produce a far better product. Yes, 1977 was a good year...but 1978 looks better. MEETING NOTICES Regular membership meetings are scheduled for January 27, March 31, and May 19 (early to avoid Memorial Day weekend). All meetings will be at the Dossin Museum at 8:00 PM.
  • Railroads in Muncie, Indiana Author Michael L. Johnston May 1, 2009

    Railroads in Muncie, Indiana Author Michael L. Johnston May 1, 2009

    Railroads in Muncie 1 Running Head: RAILROADS IN MUNCIE Railroads in Muncie, Indiana Author Michael L. Johnston May 1, 2009 Copyright 2009. M. L. Johnston. All rights reserved. Railroads in Muncie 2 Running Head: Railroads in Muncie Abstract Railroads in Muncie, Indiana explains the evolution of railroads in Muncie, and Delaware County, Indiana. Throughout the history of the United States, the railroad industry has been a prominent contributor to the development and growth of states and communities. Communities that did not have railroads did not develop as competitively until improvements in roads and highways gave them access to an alternative form of transportation. This manuscript provides a brief overview of the history and location of the railroads in Muncie and their importance to the growth of the community. Copyright 2009. M. L. Johnston. All rights reserved. Railroads in Muncie 3 Running Head: Railroads in Muncie Railroads in Muncie, Indiana Evolution of the U.S. Railroad Industry The U.S. railroad industry started around 1810 in the East. After the Civil War, railroad construction was rampant and often unscrupulous. Too many railroad lines were built that were under-capitalized, poorly constructed, and did not have enough current business to survive. Monopolistic and financial abuses, greed and political corruption forced government regulations on the railroads. From 1887 until 1980 the federal Interstate Commerce Commission strictly regulated economics and safety of all railroads operating in the U.S. Until 1980 the various states, also, regulated economics and safety of railroad companies within their individual state boundaries. Railroads are privately owned and the federal government considers them to be common carriers for the benefit of the public.
  • Index to Volume 77

    Index to Volume 77

    INDEX TO VOLUME 77 Reproduction of any part of this volume for commercial pur poses is not allowed without the specific permission of the publishers. All contents © 2016 and 2017 by Kalmbach Publishing Co., Wau kesha, Wis. JANUARY 2017 THROUGH DECEMBER 2017 – 910 PAGES HOW TO USE THIS INDEX: Feature material has been indexed three or more times—once by the title under which it was published, again under the author’s last name, and finally under one or more of the subject categories or railroads. Photographs standing alone are indexed (usually by railroad), but photo graphs within a feature article are not separately indexed. Brief news items are indexed under the appropriate railroad and/or category; news stories are indexed under the appro- priate railroad and/or category and under the author’s last name. Most references to people are indexed under the company with which they are easily identified; if there is no easy identification, they may be indexed under the person’s last name (for deaths, see “Obi t uaries”). Maps, museums, radio frequencies, railroad historical societies, rosters of locomotives and equipment, product reviews, and stations are indexed under these categories. Items from countries other than the U.S. and Canada are indexed under the appropriate country. A Amtrak Capitol Limited at Point of Rocks, Md., Gallery, 10 minutes at Fassifern, In My Own Words, Jan 56-57 Mar 69 Aberdeen & Asheboro: Amtrak consists, Ask TRAINS, Nov 65 Sleepy short line to busy unit train host, Jun 24-31 (correc) Amtrak diners enter service,
  • Cincinnati 7

    Cincinnati 7

    - city of CINCINNATI 7 RAILROAD IMPROVEMENT AND SAFETY PLAN Ekpatm~d Tra tim & Engineering Tran~~murnPlanning & Urhn 'Design EXHIBIT Table of Contents I. Executive Summary 1 Introduction 1 Background 7 Purpose 7 I. Enhance Rail Passenger Service to the Cincinnati Union Terminal 15 11. Enhance Freight Railroad Service to and Through Cincinnati 21 111. Identify Railroad Related Safety Improvements 22 RlSP Projects 26 Conclusions 26 Recommendations 27 Credits List of Figures Figure 1 Cincinnati Area Railroads Map (1965) Figure 2 Cincinnati Area Railroads Map (Existing) Figure 3 Amtrak's Cardinal on the C&O of Indiana Figure 4 Penn Central Locomotive on the Blue Ash Subdivision Figure 5 CSX Industrial Track (Former B&0 Mainline) at Winton Road Figure 6 Cincinnati Riverfront with Produce Companies Figure 7 Railroads on the Cincinnati Riverfront Map (1976) Figure 8 Former Southwest Connection Piers Figure 9 Connection from the C&O Railroad Bridge to the Conrail Ditch Track Figure 10 Amtrak's Cardinal at the Cincinnati Union Terminal Figure 11 Chicago Hub Network - High Speed Rail Corridor Map Figure 12 Amtrak Locomotive at the CSX Queensgate Yard Locomotive Facility Figure 13 Conceptual Passenger Rail Corridor Figure 14 Southwest Connection Figure 15 Winton Place Junction Figure 16 Train on CSX Industrial Track Near Evans Street Crossing Figure 17 Potential Railroad Abandonments Map Figure 18 Proposed RlSP Projects Map Figure 19 RlSP Project Cost and Priority Executive Summary Introduction The railroad infrastructure in Cincinnati is critical for the movement of goods within the City, region, and country. It also provides the infrastructure for intercity passenger rail.
  • CED-78-82 Information on Questions Asked About Conrail's Service In

    CED-78-82 Information on Questions Asked About Conrail's Service In

    DOCURlIT RESURE 05624 - B0965894] Information on Questions Asked about Conrails Service in the Scranton, Pennsylvania, Area. CD-78-82; B-164497 (5). April 4, 1978. 2 pp. appendix (13 pp.). Report to Sen. H. John eins, II; by Henry Bschwege, Director, Community and Bconomic Developent Div. Issue Area: Transportatioa Svsems and Policies: Railroad Freight Transportation system (2407). Contact: Community and Economic Development Div. Budget Function: Coaaertc and Transportations Ground T;.ansportation (404). Organization Concerned: Consolidated ail Corp.; Interstate Commaserce Commission. Congressional Relevance: House Comaittee o Interstate and Foreign Comerce; Senate Committee on Commerce. Sen. John Heinz, III. Authority: Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 P.L. 94-210). Regional Rail Reorganization Act of 1973 (45 .S.C. 701). The Railroad evitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 required that each railroad designated by the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) as a class I railroad prepare and submit a full and coaplete analysis of its rail system to the secretary of Transportation. review was conducted of the Consolidated ail Corporaticai's (Conraills) procedures in gathering information for deteamining the classification and designation of rail lines, the circumstances surrounding the closing of Conrail's pivgyback terminal in Scranton, Pennsylvania, and Conrail's plans for the rail line serving Scrantcn. Findings/conclusions: Conrail's estimated annual volume of about 4.5 nillion g s tons for the Scranton line was determined by train ovemeats during the week of December 12, 1976. Conrail's data accurately portrayed the then-current level of traffic, and the line was correctly designatei as a category A branchline.
  • Michigan's Railroad History

    Michigan's Railroad History

    Contributing Organizations The Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) wishes to thank the many railroad historical organizations and individuals who contributed to the development of this document, which will update continually. Ann Arbor Railroad Technical and Historical Association Blue Water Michigan Chapter-National Railway Historical Society Detroit People Mover Detroit Public Library Grand Trunk Western Historical Society HistoricDetroit.org Huron Valley Railroad Historical Society Lansing Model Railroad Club Michigan Roundtable, The Lexington Group in Transportation History Michigan Association of Railroad Passengers Michigan Railroads Association Peaker Services, Inc. - Brighton, Michigan Michigan Railroad History Museum - Durand, Michigan The Michigan Railroad Club The Michigan State Trust for Railroad Preservation The Southern Michigan Railroad Society S O October 13, 2014 Dear Michigan Residents: For more than 180 years, Michigan’s railroads have played a major role in the economic development of the state. This document highlights many important events that have occurred in the evolution of railroad transportation in Michigan. This document was originally published to help celebrate Michigan’s 150th birthday in 1987. A number of organizations and individuals contributed to its development at that time. The document has continued to be used by many since that time, so a decision was made to bring it up to date and keep the information current. Consequently, some 28 years later, the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) has updated the original document and is placing it on our website for all to access. As you journey through this history of railroading in Michigan, may you find the experience both entertaining and beneficial. MDOT is certainly proud of Michigan’s railroad heritage.
  • Maryland State Rail Plan

    Maryland State Rail Plan

    Larry Hogan, Governor Boyd Rutherford, Lt. Governor Pete K. Rahn, Secretary of Transportation April 2015 www.camsys.com Maryland Statewide Rail Plan prepared for Maryland Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 4800 Hampden Lane, Suite 800 Bethesda, MD 20814 date April 2015 Maryland Statewide Rail Plan Table of Contents 1.0 About the Plan ..................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Plan Development ...................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Plan Organization ....................................................................................... 1-3 1.3 Purpose of the Rail Plan ............................................................................. 1-3 1.4 Federal Compliance .................................................................................... 1-4 2.0 Maryland’s Rail History .................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Amtrak and Conrail ................................................................................... 2-3 2.2 MARC ........................................................................................................... 2-3 2.3 Short Lines ................................................................................................... 2-4 2.4 Summary ...................................................................................................... 2-5 3.0 Mission, Vision, and Goals ..............................................................................
  • The Virginia State Rail Plan

    The Virginia State Rail Plan

    final report The Virginia State Rail Plan: A Multimodal Strategy to Meet the Commonwealth’s Passenger and Freight Transportation Needs Through 2025 prepared by The Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation Karen J. Rae, Director of Rail and Public Transportation June 15, 2004 final report Virginia State Rail Plan prepared for Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 4445 Willard Avenue, Suite 300 Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815 with Jacobs Civil, Inc. June 15, 2004 Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation Virginia State Rail Plan Table of Contents 1.0 The Context for the Virginia State Rail Plan............................................................ 1 1.1 VTrans2025 – The Vision and Framework ......................................................... 2 1.2 Vision, Goals, and Objectives of the Virginia State Rail Plan .......................... 5 1.3 The Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century.......................................... 13 1.4 Other Rail Planning Efforts and Initiatives in Virginia .................................... 14 2.0 The Demography and Economy of the Commonwealth of Virginia: Factors Impacting on Rail Needs................................................................................ 17 2.1 Current Population and Employment and Projected Growth......................... 18 2.2 Freight and Commuter Rail Demand Likely to Outpace Population Growth ...............................................................................................
  • Alabama Rail Directory

    Alabama Rail Directory

    Photo by WILLIAM MARTIN Alabama Rail Directory Bureau of Transportation Planning and Modal Programs June 2014 2013 Alabama Rail Directory Prepared for Alabama Department of Transportation Bureau of Transportation Planning and Modal Programs Prepared by J. R. Wilburn and Associates, Inc. June 2014 2013 Alabama Rail Directory Alabama Department of Transportation TABLE OF CONTENTS THE RAILROADS IN ALABAMA Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 Map of the Railroads in Alabama .................................................................................. 2 CLASS I RAILROADS IN ALABAMA Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co. (BNSF) .......................................................... 4 Canadian National Illinois Central (CN/IC) ................................................................... 11 CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSXT) ................................................................................ 14 Norfolk Southern Corporation (NS) ............................................................................. 18 CLASS II (REGIONAL) RAILROADS IN ALABAMA Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway, LLC (AGR)^................................................................. 25 CLASS III (SHORTLINE/LOCAL) RAILROADS IN ALABAMA Alabama & Tennessee River Railway, LLC (ATN) ........................................................... 29 Alabama Railroad Co. (ALAB) ..................................................................................... 31 Alabama
  • National Transportation Safety Board

    National Transportation Safety Board

    PB88-916304 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. 20594 RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT HEAD-ON COLLISION OF CSX TRANSPORTATION FREIGHT TRAINS EXTRA 4443 NORTH AND EXTRA 4309 SOUTH EAST CONCORD, NEW YORK FEBRUARY 6,1987 NTSB/RAR-88/03 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1 Report No 2 Government Accession No 3 Recipient's Catalog No NTSB/RAR-88/03 , PB88-916304 4 Title and Subtitle Railroad Accident Reporty-Head-on 5 Report Date Collision of CSX Transportation Freight Trains Extra 4443 June 7, 1988 North and Extra 4309 South, East Concord, New York, 6 Performing Organization Code February 6, 1987 8 Performing Organization 7 Author(s) Report No 10 Work Unit No 9 Performing Organization Name and Address 4874 National Transportation Safety Board 11 Contract or Giant No Bureau of Field Opertions Atlanta Field Office 13 Type of Report and Washington, D C 20594 Period Covered Railroad Accident Report 12 Sponsoring Agency Name and Address February 6, 1987 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Washington, D C 20594 14 Sponsoring Agency Code 15 Supplementary Notes 16 Abstract On February 6, 1987, two CSX Transportation freight tiains collided head-on at East Concord, New York Both trains were operating on dispatcher-issued train orders in nonsignaled territory Two crewmembers were killed, one crewmember was injured seriously, and six crewmembers received minor injuries Damage was estimated at $2,009,950 The safety issues examined were transmission of train orders and messages via telecopier to an unstaffed train