DOCSLIB.ORG

The History and Future of the Rare, Endemic Plant Species, Draba Yukonensis (Yukon Draba)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The History and Future of the Rare, Endemic Plant Species, Draba Yukonensis (Yukon Draba) University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2021-02-11 The history and future of the rare, endemic plant species, Draba yukonensis (Yukon Draba) Jasper, Caroline Jasper, C. (2021). The history and future of the rare, endemic plant species, Draba yukonensis (Yukon Draba) (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/113098 master thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY The history and future of the rare, endemic plant species, Draba yukonensis (Yukon Draba) by Caroline Jasper A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE GRADUATE PROGRAM IN BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES CALGARY, ALBERTA FEBRUARY, 2021 © Caroline Jasper 2021 ABSTRACT Many species in Canada remain poorly characterized regarding the projected impact of climate change. Here, I report my results from species distribution modeling for the rare, Yukon endemic plant, Draba yukonensis. Predicted change in range size in 2070 is an increase of 171375.1- 184318.0 km2, which is surprising considering its limited known range. Overlap of predicted future and current ranges is 96.9-97.4%. Occurrence of protected areas in the predicted future range is 9.7-10.5%. It is possible that D. yukonensis represents a recently originated variety of a more common species that recently experienced polyploidization. I therefore performed phylogenetic analyses to elucidate relationships of D. yukonensis with other Draba species in the Yukon. I found that D. yukonensis is appropriately delineated as a Canadian endemic species and may be an allopolyploid of D. fladnizensis and D. lactea, or, likelier, is closely related to D. lactea. Overall, this work provides important predictions regarding where D. yukonensis could require interventions to aid its conservation. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my incredible Supervisor and mentor, Dr. Jana Vamosi, whose sage advice, dedication to my project, and constant encouragement were immeasurably appreciated. You were there with the perfect thing to say every time I needed it, and I truly admire you. To my committee members, Dr. Marco Musiani and Dr. Mindi Summers, who put in a great deal of effort in reviewing and commenting on my work, thank you for all of your support. Also, I thank Renna Truong of SANDS at the University of Calgary, whose patience while teaching me ArcGIS is commendable. To the teams at the Yukon Conservation Data Centre and Canadian Wildlife Services in the Yukon (including Syd Cannings, Bruce Bennett, Randi Mulder, Kristy Kennedy, and Caitlin Willier), thank you for showing me your beautiful part of the world and helping me attain the data needed to better understand it. Thank you to Dr. Jenny McCune of the University of Lethbridge, whose important work in species distribution modeling is paving the way for newcomers like me. To the Champagne and Aishihik First Nations, thank you for your continued and invaluable land stewardship, which helps to protect Yukon Draba and the other wildlife in your territories. To my family and friends, thank you for constantly checking in and always being there for me. To my best friends, my husband Jeremy and our cats, Crookshanks and Siam, thank you for your sacrifices and infinite love while I pursue my aspirations. iii DEDICATION To my husband, Jeremy. You gave me courage when I felt intimidated, happiness when I cried, and peace when I worried. Thank you for being you. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................ ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................. iii DEDICATION .................................................................................................................. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................... v LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ vi LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................... vii CHAPTER 1: GENERAL INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 2: PREDICTING THE FUTURE DISTRIBUTION OF YUKON DRABA DUE TO CLIMATE CHANGE ......................................................................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 5 METHODS .................................................................................................................... 10 RESULTS ...................................................................................................................... 18 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................ 20 TABLES ........................................................................................................................ 28 FIGURES....................................................................................................................... 31 CHAPTER 3: UNDERSTANDING THE ORIGIN AND PHYLOGENETIC POSITION OF YUKON DRABA ............................................................................................................. 47 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 47 METHODS .................................................................................................................... 52 RESULTS ...................................................................................................................... 55 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................ 57 TABLES ........................................................................................................................ 66 FIGURES....................................................................................................................... 68 CHAPTER 4: GENERAL CONCLUSIONS.................................................................... 78 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 82 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS ................................................................................ 98 v LIST OF TABLES TABLE 2.1: LIST OF ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLES ............................................ 28 TABLE 2.2: AREAS OF CALCULATIONS .................................................................. 30 TABLE 3.1: LIST OF ACCESSIONS.............................................................................. 66 vi LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 2.1: SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELING ................................................. 31 FIGURE 2.2: YUKON DRABA IMAGE AND KNOWN DISTRIBUTION ................ 33 FIGURE 2.3: SYSTEMATIC SAMPLING GRIDS ........................................................ 35 FIGURE 2.4: TRANSFORMATION OF CONTUNIOUS MAPS TO BINARY MAPS USING THRESHOLDS................................................................................................................. 37 FIGURE 2.5: MEAN CONTINUOUS PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION MAPS ......... 38 FIGURE 2.6: BINARY DISTRIBUTION MAPS ............................................................ 40 FIGURE 2.7: OVERLAP OF PREDICTED CURRENT AND FUTURE DISTRIBUTIONS MAPS ................................................................................................................................ 43 FIGURE 2.8: OVERLAP OF PROTECTED AREAS AND PREDICTED FUTURE DISTRIBUTION MAPS ................................................................................................... 45 FIGURE 3.1: PHYLOGENETIC TREES AND NETWORKS ....................................... 68 FIGURE 3.2: RANGES OF DRABA SPECIES USED IN THIS STUDY ....................... 70 FIGURE 3.3: MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD TREE FOR CONCATENATED GENES ... 72 FIGURE 3.4: NETWORK ANALYSIS OF CONCATENATED GENES ...................... 74 FIGURE 3.5: IMAGES OF D. YUKONENSIS, D. FLADNIZENSIS, & D. LACTEA ..... 76 FIGURE 3.6: OVERLAP OF RANGES OF D. YUKONENSIS, D. FLADNIZENSIS, & D. LACTEA ............................................................................................................................ 77 FIGURE S1: MAPS OF YUKON TERRITORY, CANADA .......................................... 98 FIGURE S2: MAXIMUM PARSIMONY TREE FOR CONCATENATED GENES .. 100 FIGURE S3: BAYESIAN INFERENCE TREE FOR CONCATENATED GENES .... 101 FIGURE S4: MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD TREE FOR ITS2 ........................................ 102 FIGURE S5: MAXIMUM PARSIMONY TREE FOR ITS2 ......................................... 103 FIGURE S6: BAYESIAN INFERENCE TREE FOR ITS2 ........................................... 104 FIGURE S7: NETWORK ANALYSIS FOR ITS2
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Draba Fladnizensis
    SPECIES: Scientific [common] Draba fladnizensis - Wulfen [Austrian Draba] Forest: Salmon–Challis National Forest Forest Reviewer: Jessica M Dhaemers; Brittni Brown; John Proctor Date of Review: 09/25/2017; 14 February 2018; 19 March 2018 Forest concurrence (or YES recommendation if new) for inclusion of species on list of potential SCC: (Enter Yes or No) FOREST REVIEW RESULTS: 1. The Forest concurs or recommends the species for inclusion on the list of potential SCC: Yes_X__ No___ 2. Rationale for not concurring is based on (check all that apply): Species is not native to the plan area _______ Species is not known to occur in the plan area _______ Species persistence in the plan area is not of substantial concern _______ FOREST REVIEW INFORMATION: 1. Is the Species Native to the Plan Area? Yes _X_ No___ If no, provide explanation and stop assessment. 2. Is the Species Known to Occur within the Planning Area? Yes _X _ No___ If no, stop assessment. Table 1. All Known Occurrences, Years, and Frequency within the Planning Area Year Number of Location of Observations (USFS Source of Information Observed Individuals District, Town, River, Road Intersection, HUC, etc.) Date First Not Challis National Forest, Lost IDFG Element Occurrence EO Observed: reported for River Ranger District Number: 1 1987 1987. About EO_ID: 771 75 plants Kane Lake Cirque proposed Old EO_ID: 2661 Date Last observed in Special Interest Botanical Area: Observed: 1991. northern end of the Pioneer July 26, Mountains, about 13 air miles 1991 NE of Ketchum. Mesic bottom and mid-slopes, flat and N-aspects; sandy sites on gneiss parent material.
    [Show full text]
  • High Biological Species Diversity in the Arctic Flora
    High biological species diversity in the arctic flora Hanne Hegre Grundt*, Siri Kjølner*, Liv Borgen*, Loren H. Rieseberg†‡, and Christian Brochmann* *National Centre for Biosystematics, Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1172, Blindern, NO-0318 Oslo, Norway; and †Department of Biology, Indiana University, Jordan Hall 142, 1001 East Third Street, Bloomington, IN 47405-3700 Communicated by Peter R. Crane, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom, November 28, 2005 (received for review August 11, 2005) The arctic flora is considered to be impoverished, but estimates of r ϭ 0.41 for D. nivalis; P Ͻ 0.00001). Likewise, weaker but species diversity are based on morphological assessments, which significant correlations were observed between F1 sterility and may not provide accurate counts of biological species. Here we genetic distance in both D. fladnizensis (r ϭ 0.32) and D. nivalis report on crossing relationships within three diploid circumpolar (r ϭ 0.29) (Fig. 3). Geographic distance was strongly correlated plant species in the genus Draba (Brassicaceae). Although 99% of with F1 sterility (r ϭ 0.60) in D. fladnizensis but not in D. nivalis parental individuals were fully fertile, the fertility of intraspecific (Fig. 3). crosses was surprisingly low. Hybrids from crosses within popula- tions were mostly fertile (63%), but only 8% of the hybrids from Discussion crosses within and among geographic regions (Alaska, Greenland, Our results indicate that numerous cryptic biological species Svalbard, and Norway) were fertile. The frequent occurrence of exist within D. fladnizensis and D. nivalis; 92% of the within- and intraspecific crossing barriers is not accompanied by significant among-region crosses resulted in sterile or semisterile hybrids morphological or ecological differentiation, indicating that numer- despite the full fertility of parental plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpine Flora
    ALPINE FLORA -- PLACER GULCH Scientific and common names mostly conform to those given by John Kartesz at bonap.net/TDC FERNS & FERN ALLIES CYSTOPTERIDACEAE -- Bladder Fern Family Cystopteris fragilis Brittle Bladder Fern delicate feathery fronds hiding next to rocks and cliffs PTERIDACEAE -- Maidenhair Fern Family Cryptogramma acrostichoides American Rockbrake two different types of fronds; talus & rocky areas GYMNOSPERMS PINACEAE -- Pine Family Picea englemannii Englemann's Spruce ANGIOSPERMS -- MONOCOTS CYPERACEAE -- Sedge Family Carex haydeniana Hayden's Sedge very common alpine sedge; compact, dark, almost triangular inflorescence Eriophorum chamissonis Chamisso's Cotton-Grass Cottony head; no leaves on culm ALLIACEAE -- Onion Family Allium geyeri Geyer's Onion pinkish; onion smell LILIACEAE -- Lily Family Llyodia serotina Alp Lily white; small plant in alpine turf MELANTHIACEAE -- False Hellebore Family Anticlea elegans False Deathcamas greenish white; showy raceme above basal grass-like leaves Veratrum californicum Cornhusk Lily; CA False Hellebore greenish; huge lvs; huge plant; mostly subalpine ORCHIDACEAE -- Orchid Family Plantanthera aquilonis Green Bog Orchid greenish, in bracteate spike, spur about as long as or a bit shorter than lip POACEAE -- Grass Family Deschampsia caespitosa Tufted Hair Grass open inflorescence; thin, wiry leaves; 2 florets/spikelet; glumes longer than low floret Festuca brachyphylla ssp. coloradoensis Short-leaf Fescue dark; narrow inflorescence; thin, wiry leaves Phleum alpinum Mountain Timothy dark;
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Volume 2
    Appendix F Species List Appendix F: Species List F. Species List F.1 Lists The following list and three tables denote the bird, mammal, fish, and plant species known to occur in Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (Arctic Refuge, Refuge). F.1.1 Birds of Arctic Refuge A total of 201 bird species have been recorded on Arctic Refuge. This list describes their status and abundance. Many birds migrate outside of the Refuge in the winter, so unless otherwise noted, the information is for spring, summer, or fall. Bird names and taxonomic classification follow American Ornithologists' Union (1998). F.1.1.1 Definitions of classifications used Regions of the Refuge . Coastal Plain – The area between the coast and the Brooks Range. This area is sometimes split into coastal areas (lagoons, barrier islands, and Beaufort Sea) and inland areas (uplands near the foothills of the Brooks Range). Brooks Range – The mountains, valleys, and foothills north and south of the Continental Divide. South Side – The foothills, taiga, and boreal forest south of the Brooks Range. Status . Permanent Resident – Present throughout the year and breeds in the area. Summer Resident – Only present from May to September. Migrant – Travels through on the way to wintering or breeding areas. Breeder – Documented as a breeding species. Visitor – Present as a non-breeding species. * – Not documented. Abundance . Abundant – Very numerous in suitable habitats. Common – Very likely to be seen or heard in suitable habitats. Fairly Common – Numerous but not always present in suitable habitats. Uncommon – Occurs regularly but not always observed because of lower abundance or secretive behaviors.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Plants for Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve
    Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve Plant Checklist DRAFT as of 29 November 2005 FERNS AND FERN ALLIES Equisetaceae (Horsetail Family) Vascular Plant Equisetales Equisetaceae Equisetum arvense Present in Park Rare Native Field horsetail Vascular Plant Equisetales Equisetaceae Equisetum laevigatum Present in Park Unknown Native Scouring-rush Polypodiaceae (Fern Family) Vascular Plant Polypodiales Dryopteridaceae Cystopteris fragilis Present in Park Uncommon Native Brittle bladderfern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Dryopteridaceae Woodsia oregana Present in Park Uncommon Native Oregon woodsia Pteridaceae (Maidenhair Fern Family) Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Argyrochosma fendleri Present in Park Unknown Native Zigzag fern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Cheilanthes feei Present in Park Uncommon Native Slender lip fern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Cryptogramma acrostichoides Present in Park Unknown Native American rockbrake Selaginellaceae (Spikemoss Family) Vascular Plant Selaginellales Selaginellaceae Selaginella densa Present in Park Rare Native Lesser spikemoss Vascular Plant Selaginellales Selaginellaceae Selaginella weatherbiana Present in Park Unknown Native Weatherby's clubmoss CONIFERS Cupressaceae (Cypress family) Vascular Plant Pinales Cupressaceae Juniperus scopulorum Present in Park Unknown Native Rocky Mountain juniper Pinaceae (Pine Family) Vascular Plant Pinales Pinaceae Abies concolor var. concolor Present in Park Rare Native White fir Vascular Plant Pinales Pinaceae Abies lasiocarpa Present
    [Show full text]
  • Plant List Lomatium Mohavense Mojave Parsley 3 3 Lomatium Nevadense Nevada Parsley 3 Var
    Scientific Name Common Name Fossil Falls Alabama Hills Mazourka Canyon Div. & Oak Creeks White Mountains Fish Slough Rock Creek McGee Creek Parker Bench East Mono Basin Tioga Pass Bodie Hills Cicuta douglasii poison parsnip 3 3 3 Cymopterus cinerarius alpine cymopterus 3 Cymopterus terebinthinus var. terebinth pteryxia 3 3 petraeus Ligusticum grayi Gray’s lovage 3 Lomatium dissectum fern-leaf 3 3 3 3 var. multifidum lomatium Lomatium foeniculaceum ssp. desert biscuitroot 3 fimbriatum Plant List Lomatium mohavense Mojave parsley 3 3 Lomatium nevadense Nevada parsley 3 var. nevadense Lomatium rigidum prickly parsley 3 Taxonomy and nomenclature in this species list are based on Lomatium torreyi Sierra biscuitroot 3 western sweet- the Jepson Manual Online as of February 2011. Changes in Osmorhiza occidentalis 3 3 ADOXACEAE–ASTERACEAE cicely taxonomy and nomenclature are ongoing. Some site lists are Perideridia bolanderi Bolander’s 3 3 more complete than others; all of them should be considered a ssp. bolanderi yampah Lemmon’s work in progress. Species not native to California are designated Perideridia lemmonii 3 yampah with an asterisk (*). Please visit the Inyo National Forest and Perideridia parishii ssp. Parish’s yampah 3 3 Bureau of Land Management Bishop Resource Area websites latifolia for periodic updates. Podistera nevadensis Sierra podistera 3 Sphenosciadium ranger’s buttons 3 3 3 3 3 capitellatum APOCYNACEAE Dogbane Apocynum spreading 3 3 androsaemifolium dogbane Scientific Name Common Name Fossil Falls Alabama Hills Mazourka Canyon Div. & Oak Creeks White Mountains Fish Slough Rock Creek McGee Creek Parker Bench East Mono Basin Tioga Pass Bodie Hills Apocynum cannabinum hemp 3 3 ADOXACEAE Muskroot Humboldt Asclepias cryptoceras 3 Sambucus nigra ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment for Rare Plants of the San Juan Region of Colorado
    Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment for Rare Plants of the San Juan Region of Colorado May 2014 CNHP’s mission is to preserve the natural diversity of life by contributing the essential scientific foundation that leads to lasting conservation of Colorado's biological wealth. Colorado Natural Heritage Program Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University 1475 Campus Delivery Fort Collins, CO 80523 (970) 491-7331 Report Prepared for: Tres Rios Bureau of Land Management & San Juan U.S. Forest Service Recommended Citation: J. Handwerk, B. Kuhn, R. Rondeau, and L. Grunau. 2014. Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment for Rare Plants of the San Juan Region of Colorado. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado. Front Cover from the top: Triteleia grandiflora, © Bob Dorn; Amsonia jonesii, © Joe Leahy; Eriophorum chamissonis, © Delia Malone; Drosera anglica, © Sara Brinton; Mimulus eastwoodiae, © Lori Brummer Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment for Rare Plants of the San Juan Region of Colorado Jill Handwerk, Bernadette Kuhn, Renée Rondeau, and Lee Grunau Colorado Natural Heritage Program Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 May 2014 ABSTRACT The 5 million-acre San Juan Region lies in southwest Colorado and is considered part of the Four Corners area. The Colorado Natural Heritage Program tracks 122 plant species within this region. Recently published climate models for the Southern San Juan Region project a median decrease in May precipitation across southwestern Colorado and a 4.3 F increase in average annual temperatures, suggesting drought may become problematic for these species in the future (Lukas et al. 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Flora Checklist a Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Washington State Hosted by the University of Washington Herbarium
    Washington Flora Checklist A checklist of the Vascular Plants of Washington State Hosted by the University of Washington Herbarium The Washington Flora Checklist aims to be a complete list of the native and naturalized vascular plants of Washington State, with current classifications, nomenclature and synonymy. The checklist currently contains 3,929 terminal taxa (species, subspecies, and varieties). Taxa included in the checklist: * Native taxa whether extant, extirpated, or extinct. * Exotic taxa that are naturalized, escaped from cultivation, or persisting wild. * Waifs (e.g., ballast plants, escaped crop plants) and other scarcely collected exotics. * Interspecific hybrids that are frequent or self-maintaining. * Some unnamed taxa in the process of being described. Family classifications follow APG IV for angiosperms, PPG I (J. Syst. Evol. 54:563?603. 2016.) for pteridophytes, and Christenhusz et al. (Phytotaxa 19:55?70. 2011.) for gymnosperms, with a few exceptions. Nomenclature and synonymy at the rank of genus and below follows the 2nd Edition of the Flora of the Pacific Northwest except where superceded by new information. Accepted names are indicated with blue font; synonyms with black font. Native species and infraspecies are marked with boldface font. Please note: This is a working checklist, continuously updated. Use it at your discretion. Created from the Washington Flora Checklist Database on September 17th, 2018 at 9:47pm PST. Available online at http://biology.burke.washington.edu/waflora/checklist.php Comments and questions should be addressed to the checklist administrators: David Giblin ([email protected]) Peter Zika ([email protected]) Suggested citation: Weinmann, F., P.F. Zika, D.E. Giblin, B.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Flora and Geoecology of Mont De La Table, Gaspésie, Québec
    RHODORA, Vol. 117, No. 969, pp. 1–40, 2015 E Copyright 2015 by the New England Botanical Club doi: 10.3119/14-07; first published on-line March 11, 2015. VASCULAR FLORA AND GEOECOLOGY OF MONT DE LA TABLE, GASPE´ SIE, QUE´ BEC SCOTT W. BAILEY USDA Forest Service, 234 Mirror Lake Road, North Woodstock, NH 03262 e-mail: [email protected] JOANN HOY 21 Steam Mill Road, Auburn, NH 03032 CHARLES V. COGBILL 82 Walker Lane, Plainfield, VT 05667 ABSTRACT. The influence of substrate lithology on the distribution of many vascular and nonvascular plants has long been recognized, especially in alpine, subalpine, and other rocky habitats. In particular, plants have been classified as dependent on high-calcium substrates (i.e., calcicoles) based on common restriction to habitats developed in calcareous rocks, such as limestone and marble. In a classic 1907 paper on the influence of substrate on plants, M. L. Fernald singled out a particular meadow on Mont de la Table in the Chic-Choc Mountains of Que´bec for its unusual co-occurrence of strict calcicole and calcifuge (i.e., acidophile) plant taxa. We re-located this site, investigated substrate factors responsible for its unusual plant diversity, and documented current plant distributions. No calcareous rocks were found on site. However, inclusions of calcareous rocks were found farther up the mountain. The highest pH and dissolved calcium concentrations in surface waters were found in a series of springs that deliver groundwater, presumably influenced by calcareous rocks up the slope. Within the habitat delineated by common occurrences of calcicole species, available soil calcium varied by a factor of five and soil pH varied by almost 1.5 units, depending on microtopography and relative connection with groundwater.
    [Show full text]
  • Draba Micropetala Hook. Brassicaceae Synonyms: Draba Pauciflora Var
    Draba micropetala Hook. Brassicaceae Synonyms: Draba pauciflora var. micropetala Global Distribution: Circumpolar high arctic. Alaska Distribution: Arctic Tundra. Ecoregions Occupied: Beaufort Coastal Plain. Conservation Status: S1S2 GNR; BLM Sensitive. Description25, 93, 95, 96 1 cm Fruits elliptic-ovate, slightly flattened, 2 to 3.2 mm wide Stem leaves absent Entire plant covered with stalked, 2- to 4-rayed hairs and simple hairs Leaf apexes obtuse to rounded Leaf apexes covered with multi- apexes branched, sub-cruciform hairs Branched caudex sparsely covered by persistent leaf remains Illustrated by Dagny Tande-Lid, courtesy of Stanford University Press 107 Draba micropetala General: Caespitose perennial herb from branched caudex sparsely covered by persistent leaf remains; entire plant pubescent with stalked, 2- to 4-rayed hairs and simple hairs, pubescence sometimes sparse towards the top; stems unbranched, lacking leaves. Leaves: Basal leaves arranged in rosettes, petiolated, broadly oblanceolate to broadly obovate, 6 to 20 mm long, 4 to 12 mm wide with ciliate, entire margins and rounded or obtuse apexes; stem leaves absent. Flowers: Flowers arranged in racemes of 2 to 7, bracts absent; sepals oblong, 1.8 to 2.5 mm long; petals pale yellow, narrowly spatulate to oblanceolate, 2 to 3 mm long, 1 to 1.5 mm wide. Fruits: Fruiting racemes elongated; fruiting pedicels spreading to ascending, straight, 1 to 3 mm long; fruits elliptic-ovate, slightly flattened, 5 to 10 mm tall, 2 to 3.2 mm wide; valves often densely pubescent with simple and spurred hairs. © Geir Arnesen 2007 Ecology Elevation: Near sea level to less than 10 m. Landform: Beach ridges, beach fronts, stream banks, frost scars.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 15-A
    Appendix 15-A Terrestrial Wildlife and Vegetation Baseline Report HARPER CREEK PROJECT Application for an Environmental Assessment Certificate / Environmental Impact Statement Harper Creek Mine Project Terrestrial Wildlife and Vegetation Baseline Report Prepared for Harper Creek Mining Corp. c/o Yellowhead Mining Inc. 730 – 800 West Pender Street Vancouver, BC V6C 2V6 Prepared by: This image cannot currently be displayed. Keystone Wildlife Research Ltd. 112-9547 152 Street Surrey, BC V3R 5Y5 August 2014 Harper Creek Mine Project Terrestrial Baseline Report DISCLAIMER This report was prepared exclusively for Harper Creek Mining Corporation (HCMC) by Keystone Wildlife Research Ltd. The quality of information, conclusions and estimates contained herein is consistent with the level of effort expended and is based on: i) information on the Project activities, facilities, and workforce available at the time of preparation; ii) data collected by Keystone Wildlife Research Ltd. and its subconsultants, and/or supplied by outside sources; and iii) the assumptions, conditions and qualifications set forth in this report. This report is intended for use by HCMC only, subject to the terms and conditions of its contract with Keystone Wildlife Research Ltd. Any other use or reliance on this report by any third party is at that party’s sole risk. This image cannot currently be displayed. Keystone Wildlife Research Ltd. Page ii Harper Creek Mine Project Terrestrial Baseline Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Harper Creek Project (the Project) is a proposed open pit copper mine located in south- central British Columbia (BC), approximately 150 km northeast by road from Kamloops. The Project has an estimated 28-year mine life based on a process plant throughput of 70,000 tonnes per day.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Delimitation and Speciation Process in the Seriphium Plumosum L
    Species delimitation and speciation process in the Seriphium plumosum L. complex (Gnaphalieae: Asteraceae) in South Africa By Zaynab Shaik Dissertation presented in fulfilment of the degree of Master of Science specialising in Biological Sciences Under supervision by: Assoc. Prof. G.A. Verboom (Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town) Dr N.G. Bergh (Compton Herbarium, South African National Biodiversity Institute) Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town February 2019 Abstract The remarkable richness of the Cape Floristic Region (CFR) and the high in situ diversification inferred for the region prompt interest in two key areas: first, to what extent has the true species richness of the Cape been discovered and described, and second, what are the key drivers of speciation? Steady efforts in taxonomy dating back to the early 17th century have led some to estimate that over 99% of species in the Cape flora have already been described. However, taxonomic research in the Cape has, as elsewhere, relied on morphology for delimiting species, implying that undiscovered species diversity among cryptic taxa may be substantial. Early ideas regarding the drivers of diversification in the Cape flora emphasised climatically-induced vicariant speciation. Since that time, both vicariance and ecological speciation have been invoked as drivers of diversification. However, the relative contributions of either of these modes to the richness of the flora remains unclear. The present work focuses on Seriphium plumosum, a species complex in the daisy tribe Gnaphalieae with a recent evolutionary origin and a core distribution in the Cape Floristic Region. The species’ problematic taxonomic history, its substantial morphological and ecological variability, as well as its large geographic distribution in southern Africa suggest that the current concept of the species houses multiple independent evolutionary species.
    [Show full text]