DOCSLIB.ORG

Long-Term Coho Salmon and Steelhead Trout Monitoring in Coastal Marin County 2007 Annual Monitoring Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Long-Term Coho Salmon and Steelhead Trout Monitoring in Coastal Marin County 2007 Annual Monitoring Report National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Long-term Coho Salmon and Steelhead Trout Monitoring in Coastal Marin County 2007 Annual Monitoring Report Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SFAN/NRTR—2009/269 ON THE COVER Adult coho salmon on John West Fork - Olema Creek Photograph by: Greg Brown Juvenile coho salmon on Olema Creek Photo by: Sarah Carlisle Smolt coho salmon on Redwood Creek Photograph by: Casey Del Real Long-term Coho Salmon and Steelhead Trout Monitoring in Coastal Marin County 2007 Annual Monitoring Report Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SFAN/NRTR—2009/269 Sarah Carlisle 1 Michael Reichmuth 2 Erin Brown 3 Casey del Real 1 1Point Reyes National Seashore Association, Coho and Steelhead Restoration Project 1 Bear Valley Road Point Reyes Station, Ca 94956 2National Park Service, San Francisco Bay Area Network Inventory and Monitoring Program, Point Reyes National Seashore 1 Bear Valley Road Point Reyes Station, Ca 94956 3Conservation Corps North Bay 1 Bear Valley Road Point Reyes Station, Ca 94956 November 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received informal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. This report is available from San Francisco Bay Area I&M Network website (http://www.nature.nps.gov/im/units/SFAN) and the Natural Resource Publications Management website (http://www.nature.nps.gov/publications/NRPM). Please cite this publication as: Carlisle, S., M. Reichmuth, E. Brown, and S. C. Del Real. 2008. Long-term coho salmon and steelhead trout monitoring in coastal Marin County 2007: annual monitoring progress report. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SFAN/NRTR—2009/269. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. NPS 641/100681, November 2009 ii Contents Page Figures............................................................................................................................................ ix Tables............................................................................................................................................ xv Appendixes .................................................................................................................................. xxi Executive Summary................................................................................................................... xxiii Acknowlegements....................................................................................................................... xxv 1 - Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Fish Resources .................................................................................................................. 3 1.2.1 Coho Salmon.......................................................................................................... 3 1.2.2 Steelhead ................................................................................................................ 5 1.2.3 Chinook Salmon ..................................................................................................... 6 1.2.4 Essential Fish Habitat............................................................................................ 6 1.3 Monitoring Rationale ........................................................................................................ 6 1.3.1 Monitoring Questions ............................................................................................ 7 1.3.2 Monitoring Objectives............................................................................................ 8 1.4 Watershed Background..................................................................................................... 8 1.4.1 Olema Creek .......................................................................................................... 8 1.4.2 Cheda Creek........................................................................................................... 8 1.4.3 Redwood Creek ...................................................................................................... 8 1.4.4 Pine Gulch Creek ................................................................................................... 9 2 - Sampling Design and Methods................................................................................................ 11 2.1 Adult Escapement Surveys ............................................................................................. 11 2.1.1 Rationale for Sampling Design............................................................................ 11 iii 2.1.2 Field Methods ...................................................................................................... 11 2.1.3 Olema Creek ........................................................................................................ 12 2.1.4 Lagunitas Creek Watershed - Cheda Creek......................................................... 14 2.1.5 Redwood Creek .................................................................................................... 15 2.1.6 Pine Gulch Creek ................................................................................................. 17 2.1.7 Escapement Data Analysis................................................................................... 18 2.1.8 Other Monitoring Programs ................................................................................ 18 2.2 Outmigrant Smolt Trap ................................................................................................... 18 2.2.1 Rationale for Sampling Design............................................................................ 19 2.2.2 Fyke/Pipe Trap Field Methods ............................................................................ 19 2.2.3 Fish Handling ...................................................................................................... 20 2.2.4 Site Locations....................................................................................................... 20 2.2.5 Sampling Period................................................................................................... 22 2.2.6 Smolt Trap Data Analysis .................................................................................... 22 2.3 Juvenile Surveys ............................................................................................................. 22 2.3.1 Rational for Sampling Design.............................................................................. 23 2.3.2 Juvenile Survey Field Methods ............................................................................ 23 2.3.3 Index Reach Monitoring....................................................................................... 23 2.3.4 Electrofishing/Handling....................................................................................... 24 2.4 Basinwide Estimate Methods.......................................................................................... 24 2.4.1 Habitat Surveys.................................................................................................... 24 2.4.2 Basinwide Snorkel Surveys .................................................................................. 25 2.5 General Systematic Sample Design ................................................................................ 25 2.5.1 Juvenile Survey Sample Dates ............................................................................. 25 3 - Results ..................................................................................................................................... 27 iv 3.1 WY 2007 Rainfall Totals – Bear Valley Headquarters................................................... 27 3.2 Olema Creek Escapement.............................................................................................. 28 3.2.1
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brief Description of Project
    Detailed Background on Existing Resource Conditions in Project/Study Area Giacomini Wetland Restoration Project Golden Gate National Recreation Area/ Point Reyes National Seashore Land Use: The Giacomini Ranch has been used for dairy farming since 1917. The Giacominis established their operation in the 1940s with diking of what is now referred to as the East and West Pastures and are still farming the ranch currently. The National Park Service’s reservation of use agreement with the Giacominis ends in 2007 at which the dairy operation will cease, and the entire 563 acres will be under the National Park Service (Park Service) ownership and management. Olema Marsh, which is directly south of the Giacomini Ranch in the Olema Valley, has been owned by the non-profit organization, Audubon Canyon Ranch. The marsh is primarily used by the public for walking, birding, and sightseeing opportunities. The West Marin area, including Point Reyes National Seashore (Seashore) and north district of Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA), is largely rural and comprised of agricultural operations and small residential communities. The dominant type of agriculture within the region is dairy and beef cattle operations. South of Olema Marsh lies pasturelands that are owned by the Park Service and grazed under lease by beef cattle. Leased beef cattle grazing also occurs near Park Service land at Railroad Point northeast of the Giacomini Ranch. Otherwise, most of the Giacomini Ranch and Olema Marsh is surrounded by the towns of Point Reyes Station and Inverness Park, which consist largely of residential homes and small businesses. To the north of Giacomini Ranch lies undiked marshlands that are owned by the State Lands Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • California Coastal Commission Staff Report and Recommendation
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, GOVERNOR CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION 45 FREMONT, SUITE 2000 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105- 2219 VOICE AND TDD (415) 904- 5200 FAX (415) 904- 5400 F 4b STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION Consistency Determination No. CD-048-07 Staff: LJS-SF File Date: 8/10/2007 60th Day: 10/9/2007 75th Day: 10/24/2007 Commission Meeting: 9/7/2007 FEDERAL AGENCY: National Park Service PROJECT LOCATION: Point Reyes National Seashore and Golden Gate National Recreation Area, Point Reyes Station, Marin County (Exhibits 1-3) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Giacomini Wetland Restoration Project (Exhibit 7) SUBSTANTIVE FILE DOCUMENTS: See Page 39 CD-048-07 (National Park Service) Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Executive Summary 3 I. Staff Summary 5 A. Project Background 5 Site Location and Description 5 Site History 6 Federal Land Purchase/Mitigation Requirement/ Previous Federal Consistency Review 8 Project Purpose and Objectives 10 Public Involvement 11 B. Project Description 11 Overview (Exhibit 7) 11 Project Elements 11 On-Site and Off-Site Disposal of Excavated Materials 14 Construction Schedule 14 Long-Term Management and Monitoring 15 C. Federal Agency’s Consistency Determination 15 II. Staff Recommendation 15 Motion 15 Staff Recommendation 16 Resolution to Concur 16 III. Findings and Declarations 16 A. Wetlands 16 B. Environmentally Sensitive Habitat 22 C. Water Quality 27 D. Public Access and Recreation 30 E. Hazards 34 F. Cultural Resources 35 G. Scenic Views 36 H. Agriculture 37 Substantive File Documents 39 CD-048-07 (National Park Service) Page 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Coastal Commission received a consistency determination from the National Park Service (NPS) for wetland restoration at the 550-acre Giacomini Ranch, located in Point Reyes Station at the head of Tomales Bay in Marin County.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Supervisors- Attached Please Find Our Letter of Opposition to the SCA Ordinance for Sleepy Hollow As Drafted by Our Attorne
    From: Andrea Taber To: Rice, Katie; Kinsey, Steven; Adams, Susan; Arnold, Judy; Sears, Kathrin Cc: Dan Stein; Thorsen, Suzanne; Lai, Thomas Subject: Sleepy Hollow Homeowners Association Letter of Oppostion to the SCA Ordinance Date: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 8:12:53 PM Attachments: Document4.docx Dear Supervisors- Attached please find our letter of opposition to the SCA Ordinance for Sleepy Hollow as drafted by our attorney Neil Moran of Freitas McCarthy MacMahon & Keating, LLP. Sleepy Hollow Homeowners Association May 3, 2013 Board of Supervisors of Marin County 3501 Civil Center Drive San Rafael, CA 94903-4157 Re: Stream Conservation Area (SCA) Proposed Amendments to the Development Code Honorable Members of the Board of Supervisors: INTRODUCTION The Sleepy Hollow Homes Association (SHHA) objects to the proposed changes to Chapters 22.33 (Stream Protection) and 22.63 (Stream Conservation Area Permit) as they would apply to the residents of the unincorporated portion of San Anselmo known as Sleepy Hollow. We ask that the County exempt and/or delay implementation of any changes to Chapters 22.33 and 22.63 as to the city-centered corridor streams, including Sleepy Hollow. The SHHA supports implementation of the proposed amendments to the San Geronimo Valley, to protect wildlife habitat in streams where Coho Salmon currently exist. The SHHA supports regulations to ensure the health and survival of the species in these areas. The SHHA recognizes the urgency of this matter to the San Geronimo Valley, both for the survival of the endangered and declining Coho population and for the property rights of the affected residents who are currently subject to a building moratorium.
    [Show full text]
  • Goga Wrfr.Pdf
    The National Park Service Water Resources Division is responsible for providing water resources management policy and guidelines, planning, technical assistance, training, and operational support to units of the National Park System. Program areas include water rights, water resources planning, regulatory guidance and review, hydrology, water quality, watershed management, watershed studies, and aquatic ecology. Technical Reports The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social research through the Natural Resources Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Copies of this report are available from the following: National Park Service (970) 225-3500 Water Resources Division 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 National Park Service (303) 969-2130 Technical Information Center Denver Service Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 Cover photos: Top: Golden Gate Bridge, Don Weeks Middle: Rodeo Lagoon, Joel Wagner Bottom: Crissy Field, Joel Wagner ii CONTENTS Contents, iii List of Figures, iv Executive Summary, 1 Introduction, 7 Water Resources Planning, 9 Location and Demography, 11 Description of Natural Resources, 12 Climate, 12 Physiography, 12 Geology, 13 Soils, 13
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Gentrification on the urban fringe: Prosperity and displacement in West Marin, California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/96p636xj Author Lage, Jessica Publication Date 2019 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Gentrification on the urban fringe: Prosperity and displacement in West Marin, California By Jessica Lage A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geography in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Nathan Sayre, Chair Professor Richard Walker Professor Nancy Peluso Professor Rachel Brahinsky Spring 2019 Gentrification on the urban fringe: Prosperity and displacement in West Marin, California By Jessica Lage Copyright 2019 Abstract Gentrification on the urban fringe: Prosperity and displacement in West Marin, California by Jessica Lage Doctor of Philosophy in Geography University of California, Berkeley Professor Nathan Sayre, Chair The global housing crisis, the epidemic of foreclosures, and rising global inequality have put the spotlight on gentrification in cities around the world. In the gentrifying San Francisco Bay Area, Marin County (and West Marin in particular) has escaped attention by gentrification scholars, but it is an essential part of the larger story of gentrification in the Bay Area. This dissertation examines the history of gentrification in West Marin, its relationship to regional socioeconomic transformations, and its local articulations. Gentrification in West Marin has similar characteristics to that in San Francisco and Oakland, though the continuity in West Marin’s physical landscape conceals the extent of the socioeconomic transformations gentrification has caused.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnohistory and Ethnogeography of the Coast Miwok and Their Neighbors, 1783-1840
    ETHNOHISTORY AND ETHNOGEOGRAPHY OF THE COAST MIWOK AND THEIR NEIGHBORS, 1783-1840 by Randall Milliken Technical Paper presented to: National Park Service, Golden Gate NRA Cultural Resources and Museum Management Division Building 101, Fort Mason San Francisco, California Prepared by: Archaeological/Historical Consultants 609 Aileen Street Oakland, California 94609 June 2009 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY This report documents the locations of Spanish-contact period Coast Miwok regional and local communities in lands of present Marin and Sonoma counties, California. Furthermore, it documents previously unavailable information about those Coast Miwok communities as they struggled to survive and reform themselves within the context of the Franciscan missions between 1783 and 1840. Supplementary information is provided about neighboring Southern Pomo-speaking communities to the north during the same time period. The staff of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA) commissioned this study of the early native people of the Marin Peninsula upon recommendation from the report’s author. He had found that he was amassing a large amount of new information about the early Coast Miwoks at Mission Dolores in San Francisco while he was conducting a GGNRA-funded study of the Ramaytush Ohlone-speaking peoples of the San Francisco Peninsula. The original scope of work for this study called for the analysis and synthesis of sources identifying the Coast Miwok tribal communities that inhabited GGNRA parklands in Marin County prior to Spanish colonization. In addition, it asked for the documentation of cultural ties between those earlier native people and the members of the present-day community of Coast Miwok. The geographic area studied here reaches far to the north of GGNRA lands on the Marin Peninsula to encompass all lands inhabited by Coast Miwoks, as well as lands inhabited by Pomos who intermarried with them at Mission San Rafael.
    [Show full text]
  • Smscindexpp266-273.Pdf
    INDEX References to illustrations are printed in italics. Ablin, Debbie, 42,92, 258 Azevedo, Margaret, 129 Bolinas-Stinson Beach Master Plan, Adelman, Brenda, 220, 222, 251, 260 34 Aggregate, 243-245, 257 Bagley, Bill, 120 Bolling, David, 224,260 Aggregate Resources Management Bahia Baulinas, 61 Bostick, Benton, 20, 22 (ARM) Plan, 205-206, 256, 257 Ballard, Allan, 87 Bostick, Dr. Warren, 20, 22 Agricultural and Aquifer Baptiste, Arnold, 107 Bouverie Audubon Preserve, xix, Preservation Zone, 205 Barbour, Nancy, 42, 92, 258 152, 153,155-159,258-259 Ah Pah Dam, 163 Barfield, Tom, 63 Bouverie, David, xix, 157, 159,254 Alexander Valley Reach, 236 Bay Conservation and Development Boxer, Senator Barbara, 93, 127,139 Alexander, Meg, 225,260 Commission, 18 Boyd, Rhoda, 67 Allen, Howard B„ 76,93,115,258-259 Beeby, David, 244 Brandt-Hawley, Susan, 208-209, 260 American River, 6 Behr, Peter, 66, 71, 89,97, 107, 128- Bransom-Cooke, Admiral, 65, 67 Anderson, Bruce, 200 129, 132,142,162,171, 191, Brower, David, 113 Angel Island, 12, 27 239,251 Brown, Governor Jerry, 168 Anton, John, 140 biography, 129,169 Brown, Governor Pat, xii, 33 Aquifers, importance of, 162-163 “Belling the cat”, 113,114, 205,207, Brown, Wishard, 148 See also Middle Reach; Sonoma- 209 Burge, Bob, 86 Marin Aquifer Benoist, Jay, 217 Army Corps of Engineers, 143,170, Benthos, 99 Cain, Brighton “Bugs,” 6 , 32,42 218 Bianchi, Al, 120 Cale, Mike, 192 and Bolinas Lagoon, 59, 81 Big Sulfur Creek, 152, 153 California Coastal Act of 1976, xiii, and Coyote Dam, 18, 33, 187 Bird research, 74-75 255 and Warm Springs Dam, 140, 188 Birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Instream Flow Requirements Anadromous Salmonids Spawning
    Scanned for KRIS State of California The Resources Agency Department of Fish and Game Instream Flow Requirements Anadromous Salmonids Spawning and Rearing LAGUNITAS CREEK, Marin County STREAM EVALUATION REPORT 86-2 APRIL 1986 IFIM study site near Tocaloma at about 35 cfs. IFIM study site near Gallager Ranch at about 22 cfs. ERRATA Page i Author Gary E. Smith2 Page 2 Paragraph 2, 14th line to Syncaris, it seems probable that the proposed summer and early Page 32 Recommendations, 3.a., first line If Nacasio Reservoir inflow during the preceeding month is Inside of back cover, photo caption, third line and deepened pools and Department of Fish and Game Stream Evaluation Report Report No. 86-2 Instream Flow Requirements, Anadromous Salmonids Spawning and Rearing, Lagunitas Creek, Marin County April, 1986 Gordon K. Van Vleck George Deukmejian Jack C. Parnell Secretary for Resources Governor Director The Resources Agency State of California Department of Fish and Game Instream Flow Requirements, Anadromous Salmonids Spawning and Rearing Lagunitas Creek, Marin County, I/ By Gary E. Smith 2 Abstract The Instream Flow Incremental Methodology was used to assess steelhead and coho salmon spawning and rearing streamflow/habitat relationships and requirements in Lagunitas Creek, Marin County, California. The annual flow regime developed considers individual species life stage needs. Approximately 37% of the average annual runoff is identified as being needed for spawning and rearing purposes. Typically, natural summer flows need augmentation and natural winter flows more than meet fishery needs. 1_/ Stream Evaluation Report No. 86-2, April 1986. Stream Evaluation Program. 2/ Environmental Services Division, Sacramento, California -ii- TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract...................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geology at Point Reyes National Seashore and Vicinity, California: a Guide to San Andreas Fault Zone and the Point Reyes Peninsula
    Geology at Point Reyes National Seashore and Vicinity, California: A Guide to San Andreas Fault Zone and the Point Reyes Peninsula Trip highlights: San Andreas Fault, San Gregorio Fault, Point Reyes, Olema Valley, Tomales Bay, Bolinas Lagoon, Drakes Bay, Salinian granitic rocks, Franciscan Complex, Tertiary sedimentary rocks, headlands, sea cliffs, beaches, coastal dunes, Kehoe Beach, Duxbury Reef, coastal prairie and maritime scrublands Point Reyes National Seashore is an ideal destination for field trips to examine the geology and natural history of the San Andreas Fault Zone and the North Coast of California. The San Andreas Fault Zone crosses the Point Reyes Peninsula between Bolinas Lagoon in the south and Tomales Bay in the north. The map below shows 13 selected field trip destinations where the bedrock, geologic structures, and landscape features can be examined. Geologic stops highlight the significance of the San Andreas and San Gregorio faults in the geologic history of the Point Reyes Peninsula. Historical information about the peninsula is also presented, including descriptions of the aftermath of the Great San Francisco Earthquake of 1906. Figure 9-1. Map of the Point Reyes National Seashore area. Numbered stops include: 1) Visitor Center and Earthquake Trail, 2) Tomales Bay Trail, 3) Point Reyes Lighthouse, 4) Chimney Rock area, 5) Drakes Beach, 6) Tomales Bay State Park, 7) Kehoe Beach, 8) McClures Beach, 9) Mount Vision on Inverness Ridge, 10) Limantour Beach, 11) Olema Valley, 12) Palomarin Beach, 13) Duxbury Reef 14) Bolinas Lagoon/Stinson Beach area. Features include: Point Reyes (PR), Tomales Bay (TB), Drakes Estero (DE), Bolinas Lagoon (BL), Point Reyes Station (PRS), San Rafael (SR), and San Francisco (SF), Lucas Valley Road (LVR), and Sir Francis Drake Boulevard (SFDB).
    [Show full text]
  • THIRD BIENNIAL STATE of TOMALES BAY CONFERENCE, 1992 AGENDA October 24, 1992 9:00 AM to 4:40 PM 9:00 Registration 9:30 Welcom
    THIRD BIENNIAL STATE OF TOMALES BAY CONFERENCE, 1992 AGENDA October 24, 1992 9:00 AM to 4:40 PM 9:00 Registration 9:30 Welcome: John Grissim, Environmental Action Committee of West Marin 9:35 Keynote: Skip Schwartz, Audubon Canyon Ranch 9:50 Summation of First Two Conferences: Bruce Wyatt, U.C. Cooperative Extension Sea Grant Program 10:10 Current Issues Facing Tomales Bay: Richard Plant 10:30 State Government & Bay Protection: Senator Milton Marks 10:40 The Role of County Government and the Coastal Commission: Supervisor Gary Giacomini 10:50 My Front Yard: Clayton Lewis 11:00 Break: Refreshments 11:15 Water Quality Panel: Guest Moderator, Steve Eabry 12:35 Poetry: Dr. Michael Whitt 12:45 Lunch (provided) 1:45 Citizen Stewardship for Tomales Bay: Michael Herz, San Francisco Baykeeper 2:15 Research Panel: Guest Moderator, Jules Evens 3:35 Break: Refreshments 3:50 Tomales Bay Poetry/Song: Rhiannon 4:00 Herding Fleas: Steve Eabry, Coordinator Morro Bay Task Force 4:30 Concluding Remarks: Suzanne d'Coney, Conference Coordinator THIRD BIENNIAL STATE OF TOMALES BAY CONFERENCE 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS A Summary of the Past Two Conferences: Bruce Wyatt…………………………..………. 10 Water Quality Panel: Moderator, Steve Eabry Suntan Lotion and Other Impacts Affecting Tomales Bay: Richard Plant…………. 12 Programs and Practices for the Protection of Tomales Bay: Richard H. Bennett Ph.D……………………………………………………. 16 California Department of Fish & Game: Activities and Plans: Mike Rugg……............…… 19 California Regional Water Quality Control Board Activities and Plans Dale Hopkins…………………………………………………………….….. 21 California Department of Health Services Preharvest Shellfish Sanitation Program Gregg W. Langlois………………………………………………………….. 24 National Marine Sanctuary Protection in the Area: Edward Ueber………………… 26 Marin- Sonoma Dairy Waste Committee: Joe Mendoza…………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • W • 32°38'47.76”N 117°8'52.44”
    public access 32°32’4”N 117°7’22”W • 32°38’47.76”N 117°8’52.44”W • 33°6’14”N 117°19’10”W • 33°22’45”N 117°34’21”W • 33°45’25.07”N 118°14’53.26”W • 33°45’31.13”N 118°20’45.04”W • 33°53’38”N 118°25’0”W • 33°55’17”N 118°24’22”W • 34°23’57”N 119°30’59”W • 34°27’38”N 120°1’27”W • 34°29’24.65”N 120°13’44.56”W • 34°58’1.2”N 120°39’0”W • 35°8’54”N 120°38’53”W • 35°20’50.42”N 120°49’33.31”W • 35°35’1”N 121°7’18”W • 36°18’22.68”N 121°54’5.76”W • 36°22’16.9”N 121°54’6.05”W • 36°31’1.56”N 121°56’33.36”W • 36°58’20”N 121°54’50”W • 36°33’59”N 121°56’48”W • 36°35’5.42”N 121°57’54.36”W • 37°0’42”N 122°11’27”W • 37°10’54”N 122°23’38”W • 37°41’48”N 122°29’57”W • 37°45’34”N 122°30’39”W • 37°46’48”N 122°30’49”W • 37°47’0”N 122°28’0”W • 37°49’30”N 122°19’03”W • 37°49’40”N 122°30’22”W • 37°54’2”N 122°38’40”W • 37°54’34”N 122°41’11”W • 38°3’59.73”N 122°53’3.98”W • 38°18’39.6”N 123°3’57.6”W • 38°22’8.39”N 123°4’25.28”W • 38°23’34.8”N 123°5’40.92”W • 39°13’25”N 123°46’7”W • 39°16’30”N 123°46’0”W • 39°25’48”N 123°25’48”W • 39°29’36”N 123°47’37”W • 39°33’10”N 123°46’1”W • 39°49’57”N 123°51’7”W • 39°55’12”N 123°56’24”W • 40°1’50”N 124°4’23”W • 40°39’29”N 124°12’59”W • 40°45’13.53”N 124°12’54.73”W 41°18’0”N 124°0’0”W • 41°45’21”N 124°12’6”W • 41°52’0”N 124°12’0”W • 41°59’33”N 124°12’36”W Public Access David Horvitz & Ed Steck In late December of 2010 and early Janu- Some articles already had images, in which ary of 2011, I drove the entire California I added mine to them.
    [Show full text]
  • UCCE. the Marin Coastal Watershed Enhancement Project
    Final Report of The Marin Coastal Watershed Enhancement Project November, 1995 Prepared by University of California Cooperative Extension 1682 Novato Boulevard, Suite 150B, Novato, CA 94947 With Funding From Marin Community Foundation Production of this report was made possible by a grant from The Marin Coastal Watershed Enhancement Project Project Coordinators Ellen Rilla Stephanie Larson Principal Writer and Photographer Lisa Bush Historical Profiles Dewey Livingston Water Quality Information n Oli l Pau Design Lisa Krieshok Typesetting Nan Perrott The University of California, in accordance with applicable State and Federal laws and University policy, does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, disability, age, medical condition (cancer-related), ancestry, marital status, citizenship, sexual orientation, or status as a Vietnam-era veteran or special disabled veteran. The University also prohibits sexual harassment. Inquiries regarding the University's nondiscrimination policies may be directed to the Affirmative Action Director, University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, 300 Lakeside Drive, 6th Floor, Oakland, CA 94612-3560 (510) 987-0096. Final Report of The Marin Coastal Watershed Enhancement Project November, 1995 Prepared by n Extensio e Cooperativ a Californi f o y Universit 7 9494 A C , Novato , 15OB e Suit , Boulevard o Novat 2 168 With Funding From Marin Community Foundation Acknowledgments The Marin Coastal Watershed Enhancement Project has been the work of many dedicated indi- l environmenta d an , agencies e resourc l natura , community l agricultura e th g representin s vidual d an s meeting g attendin y b d participate t tha s landowner y man e th o t l gratefu e ar e W .
    [Show full text]