Global Environment Facility (GEF) Operations
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Seventh Operational Phase of the GEF Small Grants Programme in Malaysia Part I: Project Information GEF ID 10363 Project Type FSP Type of Trust Fund GET CBIT/NGI CBIT NGI Project Title Seventh Operational Phase of the GEF Small Grants Programme in Malaysia Countries Malaysia Agency(ies) UNDP Other Executing Partner(s) Executing Partner Type Other Executing Partner(s) Executing Partner Type UNOPS Others GEF Focal Area Multi Focal Area Taxonomy Focal Areas, Climate Change, Climate Change Adaptation, Livelihoods, Climate resilience, Innovation, Community-based adaptation, Ecosystem-based Adaptation, Climate Change Mitigation, Energy Efficiency, Sustainable Urban Systems and Transport, Agriculture, Forestry, and Other Land Use, Renewable Energy, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Community-Based Natural Resource Management, Sustainable Agriculture, Sustainable Forest, Restoration and Rehabilitation of Degraded Lands, Ecosystem Approach, Sustainable Livelihoods, Integrated and Cross-sectoral approach, Income Generating Activities, Improved Soil and Water Management Techniques, Land Degradation Neutrality, Land Productivity, Land Cover and Land cover change, Food Security, Biodiversity, Biomes, Rivers, Tropical Rain Forests, Protected Areas and Landscapes, Terrestrial Protected Areas, Productive Landscapes, Community Based Natural Resource Mngt, Species, Wildlife for Sustainable Development, Threatened Species, Mainstreaming, Tourism, Agriculture and agrobiodiversity, Influencing models, Demonstrate innovative approache, Strengthen institutional capacity and decision-making, Convene multi-stakeholder alliances, Stakeholders, Civil Society, Academia, Community Based Organization, Non-Governmental Organization, Beneficiaries, Communications, Awareness Raising, Education, Behavior change, Type of Engagement, Partnership, Consultation, Information Dissemination, Participation, Local Communities, Private Sector, Individuals/Entrepreneurs, Indigenous Peoples, Gender Equality, Gender results areas, Knowledge Generation and Exchange, Capacity Development, Access and control over natural resources, Access to benefits and services, Participation and leadership, Gender Mainstreaming, Gender-sensitive indicators, Women groups, Sex-disaggregated indicators, Integrated Programs, Food Systems, Land Use and Restoration, Sustainable Food Systems, Smallholder Farming, Landscape Restoration, Integrated Landscapes, Food Value Chains, Sustainable Cities, Integrated urban planning, Urban sustainability framework, Transport and Mobility, Green space, Urban Biodiversity, Municipal waste management, Urban Food Systems, Capacity, Knowledge and Research, Knowledge Generation, Knowledge Exchange, Learning, Adaptive management, Theory of change, Indicators to measure change Rio Markers Climate Change Mitigation Climate Change Mitigation 1 Climate Change Adaptation Climate Change Adaptation 1 Duration 48 In Months Agency Fee($) 237,500 Submission Date 10/11/2019 A. Indicative Focal/Non-Focal Area Elements Programming Directions Trust Fund GEF Amount($) Co-Fin Amount($) BD-1-1 GET 1,430,000 2,747,000 CCM-2-6 GET 1,070,000 1,353,000 Total Project Cost ($) 2,500,000 4,100,000 B. Indicative Project description summary Project Objective To enable community organizations to take collective action for adaptive landscape management in building socio-ecological resilience in i) the Crocker Range Biosphere Reserve, Sabah; ii) the Middle and Upper Baram, Sarawak and iii) the Klang Valley, Peninsular Malaysia for global environmental benefits and sustainable development. Project Financin Project Outcomes Project Outputs Trust GEF Amount($) Co-Fin Amount($) Component g Type Fund Project Financin Project Outcomes Project Outputs Trust GEF Amount($) Co-Fin Amount($) Component g Type Fund Resilient Technical 1.1 Improved governance of 1.1.1 Multi-stakeholder groups GET 1,406,842 3,060,619 landscapes for Assistance selected landscapes for formed, and Memorandum of sustainable socio-ecological resilience Agreement signed among the major development through multi-stakeholder stakeholders regarding long term and global governance platforms and outcomes for each landscape. environmenta participatory decision 1.1.2 Comprehensive socio- l protection making ecological baseline assessments 1.2 Civil society and conducted through participatory community organisations in research and planning selected landscapes build 1.1.3 Landscape strategies their adaptive management developed by multi-stakeholder capacities by implementing groups for each landscape community level projects to achieve biodiversity and 1.1.4 Typology of community level ecosystem conservation and small grant projects and selection socio ecological production criteria developed by multi- landscape resilience. stakeholder groups. 1.3 Livelihoods of 1.2.1 Community level small grant communities in the target projects that conserve biodiversity landscapes are improved by and enhance ecosystem services developing sustainable (participatory decision, co- community enterprises and management of protected areas, improving market access. watershed management) 1.4 Increased adoption (or 1.2.2 Community level small grant development, demonstration projects that implement agro- and financing) of renewable ecology principles in diversification and energy efficiency of agricultural production technologies and climate landscapes. mitigation options at 1.3.1 Community level small grant community level. projects in the selected landscapes that develop community enterprises through access to fair trade and new markets, increase effective distribution of community products, improve marketing strategies (business model innovation and new technology) and improve quality of community products 1.4.1 Community level small grant projects to build the capacities of community organisations to plan strategically and implement projects that increase energy efficiency and reduce impact on climate through the use of renewable energy and waste management. 1.4.2 Broader adoption of successfully piloted community level renewable energy (RE) and energy efficient technologies through upscaling programs at landscape level. Project Financin Project Outcomes Project Outputs Trust GEF Amount($) Co-Fin Amount($) Component g Type Fund Knowledge Technical 2.1 Knowledge from 2.1.1 Knowledge generation through GET 974,110 844,143 Management Assistance community level project monitoring and evaluation, on landscape engagement and innovative with lessons compiled, systematized governance conservation practices is and disseminated to multiple and adaptive systematically assessed and audiences. management shared for replication and 2.2. Detailed analysis of successful for Upscaling upscaling across the grant project portfolios in each and landscape, country and to landscape, lessons learned/best Replication the global SGP network. practices and market opportunities 2.2 Adoption of successful documented to provide policy inputs SGP supported technologies, at regional and national level. practices or systems by policy makers, government agencies, financial partners and private sector at regional and national levels. Sub Total ($) 2,380,952 3,904,762 Project Management Cost (PMC) GET 119,048 195,238 Sub Total($) 119,048 195,238 Total Project Cost($) 2,500,000 4,100,000 C. Indicative sources of Co-financing for the Project by name and by type Sources of Co- Name of Co-financier Type of Co- Investment Amount($) financing financing Mobilized GEF Agency UNDP In-kind Recurrent 200,000 expenditures Government Ministry of Energy Science, Technology, Environment and Climate Change In-kind Recurrent 200,000 (MESTECC) expenditures Government Ministry of Water, Land and Natural Resources (KATS) In-kind Recurrent 200,000 expenditures Government Ministry of Agriculture and Agro-based Industry (MOA) In-kind Recurrent 100,000 expenditures Government Sabah Parks In-kind Recurrent 100,000 expenditures Private Sector Habitat Foundation Grant Investment mobilized 100,000 CSO Grantee In-kind Recurrent 2,100,000 expenditures CSO Grantee Grant Investment mobilized 1,100,000 Total Project Cost($) 4,100,000 Describe how any "Investment Mobilized" was identified The Investment Mobilized figures are based on discussions with the sources identified and will be formally confirmed through co-financing letters defining each contribution in cash or in kind. SGP global policy requests grant recipient CSOs to contribute to their projects in cash to the best of their abilities. The National Steering Committee will foster compliance with this policy as appropriate. These contributions will only be confirmed during project implementation at the time of grant project approval. The SGP National Coordinator was instructed to differentiate co-financing commitments between those corresponding to recurrent costs e.g. salaries of NGO or government staff, costs of premises, etc., and Investment Mobilized, corresponding to new and additional funding either directly contributed to SGP for application to SGP project grants (as grantee contributions in kind and in cash), or mobilized investment to support project objectives, but not managed by SGP. D. Indicative Trust Fund Resources Requested by Agency(ies), Country(ies), Focal Area and the Programming of Funds Agency Trust Fund Country Focal Area Programming of Funds Amount($) Fee($) Total($) UNDP GET Malaysia Biodiversity BD STAR Allocation 1,430,000 135,850 1,565,850 UNDP GET Malaysia Climate Change CC STAR Allocation 1,070,000 101,650 1,171,650