TACKLING MONEY LAUNDERING IN EAST AND SOUTHERN AFRICA

AN OVERVIEW OF CAPACITY VOLUME ONE

Edited by CHARLES GOREDEMA

ISS MONOGRAPH SERIES • NO 107, OCTOBER 2004 ii Tackling money laundering in East and Southern Africa CONTENTS

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS iv

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vi

ABOUT THE AUTHORS vii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ix

CHAPTER 1 1 Overview

CHAPTER 2 Botswana’s legislative capacity to curb money laundering 25

CHAPTER 3 The control of money laundering and terrorist funding in Kenya 38

CHAPTER 4 The capacity of financial institutions and the business sector in to detect and control money laundering 76

CHAPTER 5 An evaluation of infrastructure to detect and control money laundering and terrorist funding in Malawi 100 iv Tackling money laundering in East and Southern Africa

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW CEO Chief Executive Officer DRC Democratic FATF Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering ISS Institute for Security Studies LHDA Lesotho Highlands Development Authority SADC Southern African Devlopment Community SSC Social Security Commission TNC Transnational corportion UN United Nations

CHAPTER 2: BOTSWANA BoB Bank of Botswana DCEC Directorate on Corruption and Economic Crime DCEA Directorate on Corruption and Economic Crime Act FIA Financial Intelligence Agency MACMA Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act PSCA Proceeds of Serious Crime Act

CHAPTER 3: KENYA CBK of Kenya IDCM Interministerial Drug Co-ordinating Committee KACA Kenya Anti-Corruption Authority UN United Nations US United States UNDCP United Nations Drug Control Programme

CHAPTER 4: LESOTHO FIU Financial Intelligence Unit LHDA Lesotho Highlands Development Authority LHWP Lesotho Highlands Water Project LRA Lesotho Revenue Authority UN United Nations Acronyms and abbreviations v

CHAPTER 5: MALAWI FICA Financial Intelligence Centre Act SADC Southern African Development Community SARPCCO Southern African Regional Police Chiefs Co- ordinating Organisation SGS Society Generale Desuiveillance UN United Nations

CURRENCIES ZAR Ksh Kenya Shilling Tsh Tanzania Shilling Ush Uganda Shilling BP MWK Malawi Kwacha EUR LSL Lesotho Loti MZM Mozambique Metical US$ Z$ Dollar C$ Canadian Dollar N$ vi Tackling money laundering in East and Southern Africa

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

As an applied policy research institute that strives to conceptualise, inform and enhance the security debate in Africa, the Institute for Security Studies (ISS) is committed to undertake independent research and analysis, facilitate and support the formulation of policy, raise the awareness of the public and of decision makers, and monitor trends and policy implementation.

The ISS has been fortunate to secure the generous assistance of the Royal Danish government in this endeavour. The ISS enlisted the professional research services of the eminent researchers who contributed to the two volumes that comprise this monograph, namely Ray Goba, Peter Edopu, Jai Banda, Kamogediso Mokongwa, Nomzi Gwintsa, George Kegoro, Bothwell Fundira and Eugene Mniwasa. In conducting the studies used in compiling this monograph, each researcher interacted with persons, agencies and institutions too numerous to list. The ISS expresses its gratitude to the Royal Danish government, to all the researchers who contributed material to the monograph and to all persons, agencies and institutions that provided information to them. The ISS also thanks Fiona Adams for language editing and layout. Executive summary vii

ABOUT THE AUTHORS

Charles Goredema is a Senior Research Fellow with the Institute for Security Studies (ISS) in Cape Town where he specialises in research into money laundering, organised crime and corruption in Southern Africa. He holds qualifications in law from the Universities of Zimbabwe and London and practised as a prosecutor in the Justice Ministry in Zimbabwe in 1983 before embarking on an academic career in 1987. He joined the ISS in August 2000 after teaching criminal justice law at the Universities of Zimbabwe, Cape Town and the Western Cape. He has published extensively in the spheres of criminal justice and human rights law.

Kamogediso Mokongwa is the Managing Partner at Mokongwa Lekoba Attorneys, a law firm in Gaborone, Botswana. She holds an LL.B from the University of Botswana and a Masters degree in legislative drafting from the University of the West Indies.

George Kegoro is the secretary of the Law Society of Kenya and an advocate of the High Court of Kenya. He holds an LL.B from the University of Nairobi. Following his graduation in 1992, he joined the public service in Kenya in the Attorney General’s office, where he worked as a research officer in the Kenya Law Reform Commission before joining the Law Society of Kenya as Deputy Secretary in 1995. He has been involved in anti-corruption work as part of the statutory mandate that the Law Society of Kenya has to advise the government and the public in Kenya on all matters relating to, or ancillary to, the law and the administration of justice. He has also consulted for Transparency International Kenya on wide range of issues relating to the fight against corruption.

Mokhibo Nomzi Gwintsa is a Researcher in the Organised Crime and Corruption Programme of the ISS in Cape Town, focusing on money laundering research. She holds an LL.B from the National University of Lesotho. She was involved for a number of years in research on women and on children’s rights and has undertaken consultancy work on media law and on money laundering. viii Tackling money laundering in East and Southern Africa

Jai Banda is a lawyer in private commercial practice with Sacranie, Gow and Company, one of the longest-established law firms in Blantyre, Malawi. Born in Zimbabwe of Malawian parents, he read law at the Universities of Lesotho and Zimbabwe. Following graduation he practised briefly with a law firm specialising in commercial law in Harare before taking up his present appointment. He is a director of several companies in Malawi, including the major electricity supplier, Eskom. He has contributed to ISS publications on organised crime legislation in Southern Africa and is knowledgeable on the incidence of economic crime in Malawi. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

In the first of this two-volume monograph, Charles Goredema, in a broad overview, presents an outline of factors impacting on the capacity of key sectors of the relevant infrastructure to detect the laundering of tainted money and other illicit proceeds. To some extent the overview assesses their strengths and/or weaknesses against the backdrop of real challenges identified from sub-regional case studies.

In Botswana money-laundering control appears to be shared by the police, the Bank of Botswana and the Directorate for Economic Crime and Corruption. Anti- money laundering law is of recent origin in the country. In Chapter 2 of this volume, Kamogediso Mokongwa reviews its enforcement and comments on the perceived capacity of the relevant institutions.

In his contribution on the control of money laundering in Kenya in Chapter 3, George Kegoro observes that this will require concerted and co-ordinated action at two levels. At the first level, measures are required to detect and punish economic crime, from which illicit money is derived. The principal sources of proceeds of crime—which include corruption, drug trafficking and violent crime— were identified in an earlier study. Measures to control offences related to these activities will augment whatever control mechanisms are introduced against money laundering in Kenya. Also examined are the measures required at the second level, to address the problem of money laundering directly, as an independent and logical result of economic crime.

In recent years, Lesotho has come under the international spotlight over a variety of criminal and civil cases arising from the corruption and bribery of a top official by a number of international companies. Some major international banks were used to facilitate the laundering of the proceeds. The revelations brought into question the integrity of these institutions and had a potentially damaging effect on their reputation. Lesotho has now been placed in a position where it has to keep up the momentum to portray a genuine and sustained commitment to fight corruption. This requires a commitment to put in place institutional mechanisms to fight not only corruption, but also money laundering. Nomzi Gwintsa analyses x Tackling money laundering in East and Southern Africa

the prevailing legislative and institutional environment in Lesotho in Chapter 4 of this volume and assesses the country’s capacity.

Criminal entrepreneurs are continually looking for new routes for laundering the proceeds of crime. Economies like that of Malawi, with emerging financial centres but inadequate controls, are particularly vulnerable. The need has long been acknowledged for money laundering in Malawi to be fought by establishing a comprehensive anti-money laundering regime, with legal and complementary regulatory tools. Malawi does not yet have dedicated anti-money laundering laws. At the time of writing, a Bill was under consideration. In anticipation of its adoption, Chapter 5, written by Jai Banda, evaluates the potential of existing infrastructure in Malawi to implement laws against money laundering.

In the second volume of this monograph, Ray Goba examines the capacity of the financial and commercial services sectors in to detect, prevent or assist in the prosecution of money laundering crimes. In Chapter 1 of that volume he gives an extensive coverage of the situation in Namibia, as experienced through recent cases.

Tanzania does not have anti-money laundering laws. In Chapter 2 of the second volume, Eugene Mniwasa examines the measures adopted to address the problem of money laundering and the financing of terrorism in Tanzania.

In the face of formidable challenges, all sectors in Uganda that are charged with detecting activities predicate to money laundering are engaged in efforts to combat money laundering itself, as well. The lack of laws that specifically deal with money laundering continues to be an impediment. At the time of writing, money laundering was not a distinct crime in Uganda. To get around the inadequacy in legislation, most financial and commercial institutions have put internal or sector measures in place to detect it . Most of these institutions, such as the banks, have global linkages and thus benefit from the macro policies of parent institutions. The major multilateral banks all have internal systems developed by their main offices to be used by all their branches globally. These efforts have been complemented by anti-money laundering guidelines adopted by the Bank of Uganda in 2002 for banks and other financial institutions. In Chapter 3 of the second volume, Peter Edopu expresses the hope that when Uganda eventually passes an anti-money laundering law, the policies and procedures taking shape under the umbrella of the guidelines will be carried forward. Executive summary xi

In the final chapter of the second volume Bothwell Fundira uses South Africa’s Financial Intelligence Centre Act, (38/2000), as a benchmark against which to measure the adequacy of existing and proposed measures against money laundering in Zimbabwe. He examines the capacity of the key institutions in the light of case studies. xii Tackling money laundering in East and Southern Africa 1

CHAPTER1 OBSERVATIONS ON TYPOLOGIES OF MONEY LAUNDERING IN THE SADC REGION

Charles Goredema

Introduction

Sincethebeginningof2001theInstituteforSecurityStudies(ISS)hasbeen studyingthefactorsthatexposethefinancialandcommercialsectors,among others,inSouthernAfricanDevelopmentCommunity(SADC)statestothe launderingoftaintedmoneyandotherillicitproceeds.Thishasbeendonein variousways.Muchinformationhasbeenrevealed,publishedanddiscussedin manyfora.1Someofthefindingsarereliedoninthischapter,withoutrepetition.

Thischapterconfinesitselftothesituationinthesub-regionsincethestartof 2003.Ittracestrendsanddevelopmentsthroughexamplesandcasestudies.It makesnosignificantattempttoestimatethemagnitudeofmoneylaunderingin SADCstates.Intheprocess,thechaptergivesabroadanalysisoffactorsimpacting onthecapacityofkeysectorsoftherelevantinfrastructuretodetectthelaundering oftaintedmoneyandotherillicitproceeds.Tosomeextent,thechapterassesses theirstrengthsand/orweaknessesagainstthebackdropofrealchallengesidentified fromsub-regionalcasesstudies.Itconcludeswithtentativesuggestionsforpossible short-termoptions.Attheoutsetsomeofthechapter’slimitationsneed highlighting.Firstly,itdoesnotpurporttopresentacomprehensivepictureof theincidenceofmoneylaunderingacrosstheSADCsub-region.Due considerationhadtobegiventospaceandtimeconstraints.Secondly,money launderingisarelativelynewoffenceintheSADC.Itisnotyetuniversally recognisedassuchinallmemberstates.Thereisanunderstandableabsenceof statisticstorevealitsprevalence.Thisiscompoundedbyadeficiencyof consolidatedstatistics2ontheseriouspredicateeconomiccrimeandcorruption casesthathaveoccurredinthesub-regionduringtheperiodreviewed.More thananyotherfactor,thiswasthebiggestbarrierinpreparingatapestryofthe desireddetail.Whileprominentcasesassistinillustratingdetectedtrends,at mosttheyonlyrevealpartofthestory.Further,thecasescitedinthischapterdid notallarise(inthesensethatthepredicateoffenceswerecommitted)inthe periodunderreview.Indeed,inmostcasesthelaunderingprecededthisperiod, butthenatureandextentonlybecameknownorestablishedinthereviewperiod. 2 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica ObservationsontypologiesofmoneylaunderingintheSADCregion 3

Moneylaunderingtypologies wasvaluedatZAR2.7billion(US$270millionatthattime).Morethan100 syndicatesareknowntobeactiveinthedrug-traffickingindustryinSouth Proceedsofdrugtrafficking Africa.Itappearsthatmostlaundertheirassetslocallyintheacquisitionof motorvehicles,legitimatebusinessesandfrontcompaniesandresidential Drugtraffickingisidentifiedmostreadilywithmoneylaunderingvirtually properties.Assetseizuresinthe18-monthperiodfromJuly2002toJanuary everywhereintheSADC.Dagg a(marijuana)andmandrax(methaqualone) 2004giveanindicationofthescaleoflaunderingofdrugmoney.InJune salesfeatureprominentlyamongthesourcesofillegalfunds,buttheyareby 2002,theAssetForfeitureUnitoftheNationalProsecutingAuthorityreported nomeanstheonlyonesfamiliartocrimesyndicates.Significantsumsarealso thatofthe150casesinwhichassetshadbeenseized, 431%involveddrug generatedfromsalesofcocaine,heroinandecstasy.Sincetheearly1980sthe trafficking. drugindustryhasbeenknowntoinfluencetrendsin‘downstream’crimes, notablyvehicletheft,smuggling,corruption,housebreaking,armedrobbery RecentshiftsobservedinSouthAfrica andmurder.Asitisanindustrythatinvolvesarangeofparticipants,itisnecessary toidentifytheimportantroleplayersforthepurposesofmoneylaundering. Drugs StudiesofthedaggamarketinSouthAfricahaveidentifiedachainof Drugtraffickingtendstoprovideresourcesonwhichotherformsof entrepreneursthatincludessmall(subsistence)farmers,transporters, illegalactivityfeed.Areportontypologiesofmoneylaunderinginthe wholesalers,retailers,vendors(someoperatingoffthestreet)andexporters. sub-regionpreparedin2002underlinedthepositioningofSouthern ResearchconductedbytheISShasrevealedthat,inthemarketchain: Africa,primarilySouthAfrica,asatransitpointfornarcoticsfromthe South-EastAsiasub-continentandSouthAmericatomarketsinthe thewholesalermakesthemostmoney.Althoughhismarkup(sic)is northernhemisphere,especiallyinEurope.Intelligence-driven lessthanthatoftheretailer,thequantitiesinwhichhedealsaremuch operationsinSouthAfricainvolvingthepoliceandtheDirectorateof larger.Mostpoorlypaidaretheproducerandthestreetdealer,who SpecialOperations(theScorpions)haveresultedinnumerous‘drug workforsubsistence-levelincome.Atnopointinthedomesticmarket busts’.Theeffecthasbeentocurtailtheavailabilityofimported chainismuchmoneymade,however,asthemarketistoodiffuseand narcotics,therebyraisingtheneedfordomesticproduction.Anincrease theunitcosttoosmall.Therealmarketisinexport.3 inthenumberofmanufacturingpoints,intheformoflaboratories,is evident.Drugsfoundbeingproducedincludemethacathinone(CAT-9 Wholesalersarethereforebestpositionedtoparticipateinsignificantmoney laboratorieswerediscoveredin2003)andmandrax. launderingfromlocaldaggasales. ThedrugseizuresofJune2002,referredtoabove,yieldedchemicals Atitsprofitablelevels,drugtraffickingiscashintensive.Drugdealersusually forthemanufactureofmandraxestimatedtobeworthZAR2.7billion relyoncashasaprimarymediumofexchange.Drugtraffickersaccumulate (thenequivalenttoUS$270million). hugeamountsofcashthatmustbehiddenandconvertedtoavoiddetection Theftandhijackingofmotorvehicles ofdrugactivity.Theyshareatleastthreecharacteristicsacrossthesub-region: ThepredominanceofSouthAfricanvehiclesinthestatisticsofstolen • theyneedtoconcealtheoriginsandoftentheownershipofthemoney; andhijackedvehiclestraffickedinSouthernAfricaÊcontinuesandis linkedtoorganisedcriminalgroups.Stolenvehiclesandtrucksarestill • theyneedtocontrolthemoney;and exchangedforothergoods,suchasdrugs,firearms,cobaltand • theyneedtochangetheformofthemoney. diamonds.Thepolicereportthatcorruptionisaseriousproblemas thoseinvolvedinvehicletheftacquireanduseforgedvehicle ThedrugmarketinSouthAfricaisthelargestinthesub-region.Attheendof registrationsaswellascustomsandimmigrationdocumentation. June2002,two‘busts’—inDouglasdale,northofJohannesburg,andin Insurancefraudhasalsobeenfoundinconnectionwithtruckand RoodepoortontheWestRand—yieldedmassiveseizuresofdagga,cocaine, vehiclehijackings. ecstasy,mandraxandchemicalsforthemanufactureofmandrax.Thehaul 4 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica ObservationsontypologiesofmoneylaunderingintheSADCregion 5

Moneylaunderingandfinancialscams ‘parallel’economyiscontinuouslyexpandingattheexpenseofthe formaleconomy.Thereisanecdotalevidencethattheinformalsector SyndicatesfromSouth-EastandEastAsia,NigeriaandEasternEurope isvulnerabletomoneylaundering.AnarrestwasreportedatMavalane havebeenactiveincriminalactivitiesinSouthAfrica.Nigerian Airportofaprospectivepassengeractiveintheinformalsectorcarrying syndicatesareprimarilyinvolvedinnarcoticsandfinancialscams,for acasecontainingUS$1million. exampletheNigerian‘419’scam.Theirsuccessratehasnotbeen quantified.RussianMafiasyndicateshavebeenfoundtobeoperating inanumberofcriminalgroupsinseveralSouthernAfricanstates, AnISSresearcher,AndreStanding,studiedthecontemporarysocio-economic includingAngola,Botswana,Mozambique,Namibia,Swazilandand dimensionsofdrug-relatedcriminalactivityinCapeTown.Hecameupwith SouthAfrica.Theyconcentratemainlyondiamondandweapon ratherstartling,butimportant,findings,whichmaybeofgeneralapplication smuggling,corruption,fraudandmoneylaunderingschemes.They toilliciteconomiesintransitionalsocieties.Standing’sobservationsare arealsoinvolvedinlegitimatebusiness. reproducedbelow.5 ChineseTriadactivityappearstotakeadvantageofincreasedlevelsof illegalimmigrationfromChinaandTaiwan.Triadshavelongbeen involvedinsmugglingendangeredspecies,especially perlemoen ObservationsontheCapeFlats’illiciteconomy (abalone).Illegalactivitiesalsoincludeprostitutionandblackmail.In Operatingwithoutformalregulation,theilliciteconomydisplaysthe SouthAfrica,Chinesesyndicatesarebelievedtocontroltrafficking mostvividfailingsoffreemarketenterprise,whatwemayrefertoas routesforabalonetoandfromHongKongandSingapore,via ‘predatorycapitalism’.Moststrikingly,thespoilsofcrimeare Mozambique,SwazilandandLesotho(andoccasionallyZimbabwe). concentratedamongatinyminority,someofwhomhavebecomemulti- Robberies millionaires.Predatorycapitalismallowswinnerstotakeall. Subsequently,thefortuneofthecriminalelitethatisderivedfrom Cash-in-transitrobberies,whichmayeitherbethe‘classical’in-transit businessontheCapeFlatsisspentonlavishgoodsmanufactured heistsorpavement-typerobberies,continuedtoprovideasourceof elsewhereorisinvested,asrecommendedbybusinessconsultants,in launderedfundsintheperiodunderreview.Thenumberofreported promisingpropertyandbusinesses,almostallofwhicharebasedin cash-in-transitrobberiesdeclinedbetweenJanuaryandAugust2002. prosperousregionsoutsidetheCapeFlats.Capitalaccumulatedby NostatisticscouldbeobtainedfortheperiodSeptember2002toJuly unrestrictedcompetition,whichintheclassicmodelofcapitalismwas 2003.Thenumberofparticipantspergroupappearedtohave supposedtotrickledownandenrichsociety,isinfactpumpedoutof increased,asdidthelevelofviolenceandaggressionused.Therewas thearea. alsoanotablepre-occupationwithrobbingsecuritypersonnelof firearms.Bankrobberiesdeclined,adevelopmentattributedtogreater ThegrosspolarisationofwealthontheCapeFlatsislargelydependent securitymeasuresimplementedinthatsector,butarmedrobberyof ontheactivitiesofthemajorityofthepowerlessinthecrimeboss’s touristsincreased. community,especiallytheabundantmembersofterritorialgangs. Unlikethebosswhohaspropertiesinvariousareasandinveststhe Launderingtheproceedsofinformalenterprise proceedsofcrimeinprosperousindustries,theaveragestreetgangster TheinformalsectorcontinuestobestronginMozambique,Tanzania, isconfinedtoasmallgeographicareaandisfacedwithextremely MalawiandUganda.Illicitactivityisknowntooccurwithinthissector restrictedsocialandgeographicmobility.These“loyalbrothers”,as buthasnotbeenquantified.InMozambiqueandZimbabweitextends famouslyreferredtobyDonPinnock,supportthegangbossbybeing tothemarketingofcommoditiesofalldescriptions.InMozambique, employees,footsoldiersaswellashismajorconsumers.Thereforea thereisablackmarketthateventradesinminerals.InZimbabwethe sizeableproportionoftheprofitsgeneratedbyworkingforthecriminal 6 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica ObservationsontypologiesofmoneylaunderingintheSADCregion 7

elitearere-spentonthesamecommoditiesandservicessuppliedby commencesasaseriesofsporadictransactionsforsubsistencepurposes him.Themajorityofthosewhooperateinthecriminaleconomyare canquicklybecomeaspeciesofsyndicatedeconomiccrime. simultaneouslysociallyexcludedandcriminallyexploited. speculatorsrangefromstreettraderstoseniorpublicofficials, Whilethecriminalelitecanprotectandsustaintheirpositioninthe includinggovernmentministers.Partofthereasonforthe‘currency criminaleconomythroughviolenceandcorruptrelations,thoseatthe rush’isthevastdisparitybetweenthestipulated,lawful,rateatwhich lessprofitableendarefarlesssecure.Hereilliciteconomicactivityis theZimbabwedollarshouldtradeandthe‘real’marketrate.Arecent characterisedbyuncertaintyandvulnerability.Thecriminalboss surveyhasshownthelinkagesbetweencorruptionandcurrency providesnoincomeinsuranceoremploymentbenefits,considered speculation.Well-connectedindividualsareknowntohaveprocured basicrightsintheformaleconomy.Whatismore,fewwhoengagein hardcurrency,intheformofUSdollars,fromofficialrepositories,at pettydrugdealingorotherformsofcriminaltradeescapearrestand thegovernmentprescribedrateofZ$55totheUSdollar,and prosecution.Inprisontheaverageemployeeofthecriminaleconomy subsequentlysoldthesamecurrencyontheparallelmarketforZ$6,000. willreceivenoincomefromtheoutsideandonhisreleaseheisnot Thisrepresentsaprofitofastronomicalproportions.Recentreports guaranteedre-employment,eitherintheilliciteconomy,whichhas pointtotheconversionofZimbabwecurrencyintotheBotswanapula. anabundantsupplyofexpendableworkforce,orintheformaleconomy, Thisissubsequentlyfollowedbythefurtherconversionofthepula whichistypicallyclosedtothosewithacriminalrecord.Thisexperience intoUSdollarsinBotswanaorotherneighbouringcountries.TheUS canbecontrastedwiththatofthecriminalelitewho,whenoccasionally dollarsareeitherrepatriatedbacktoZimbabweortransmittedtoother forcedtospendtimeinprison,continuetocollectdividendsfrom countries. theirbusinessempires,whichremainintactwaitingfortheirrelease. Profitsofcurrencyspeculationareknowntohavebeeninvestedon (Footnoteshavebeenomittedfromtheextract.) thestockmarket,inrealestate,andusedtoacquireluxurymotor vehicles.6

Currencyspeculationproceeds Proceedsofcorruption ReportsontheincidenceofcommercialcrimeintheSADCregularlyhighlight AseriesofjudicialhearingsinLesothodominatedlate2002andearly2003. therolethatcurrencyspeculationplaysingeneratingproceedsformoney ThehearingsarereferredtointhischapterastheLesothoHighlandsWater laundering,facilitatedbycorruptionand,insomecases,politicalcronyismand Projectcorruptiontrials.Theamountsofmoneyinvolvedwerelargeinthe fraud. sub-regionalcontext,thoughtheymayappeartrivialontheglobalscale.The technicaldisputesprecipitatedbythetrials(whichthreatenedtooccupynearly asmuchtimeastheadjudicationofthemeritsofthecases),aswellasthe CurrencyspeculationinZimbabwe:abriefexposition issuesofprinciple,werecertainlyfarmoreimportant. TheincidenceofcurrencyspeculationisnotquantifiedinSouthern Africa,butthereisnodoubtthatitconstitutesamajorpredicateactivity formoneylaundering. TheLesothoHighlandsWaterProjectcorruptioncases Theexploitationoffluctuationsintheavailability,andconsequently, TheLesothoHighlandsWaterProjectresultedfromatreatyconcluded thevalueofforeigncurrencyhasbecomeamajorsourceofincomein betweenLesothoandSouthAfricain1986.Itsobjectivewastocreate partsofthesub-regionafflictedbyshortages.Zimbabwepresentsclassic asystemofdamsandtunnelstoprovidewatertoSouthAfricaand examplesofthepracticeatacrudelevel.Italsoillustrateshowwhat electricityforLesotho.Theimplementationoftheprojectrequired 8 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica ObservationsontypologiesofmoneylaunderingintheSADCregion 9

theestablishmentofatleastthreenewbodies,oneofwhichwascalled Thiswasreducedonappealto15years. theLesothoHighlandsDevelopmentAuthority(LHDA),mandatedto Theforensicinvestigationsrevealedatrailofmoneyleadingfromthe managetheentireproject.ItsChiefExecutiveOfficer(CEO)was TNCcontractorstosixintermediaries,allofwhommanagedbanking MasuphaSole.Theconstructionoftwodams,anessentialpartofthe accountsoutsideLesotho,andthenfurtherontoasecondtierof project,involvedtheLHDAinconductingbusinesswithawiderange intermediariesandultimatelytoSole’saccountsinGeneva.Transfers oftransnationalcorporations(TNCs),someofwhichhadhitherto weretracedfurthertoanaccountinSole’snameatStandardBankin unquestionedcredentials.Competitiontogaintenderswasstiff,anda Ladybrand,justacrosstheborderinSouthAfrica.Duringtheperiodin flurryofintermediariesparticipatedatvariousstages.Duringthecourse questionZAR406,985.79wasdepositedintotheStandardBank oftheproject,itemergedthatalargenumberofTNCshadpaidmoney account.Inaddition,Solealsodepositedforeigncurrencytothevalue intobankaccountsinSwitzerlandinthenameofcertainintermediaries, of£298,620andUS$812,406.Smalltransferswererecordedbetween andthatsomeofithadsubsequentlypassedintobankaccountsheld thataccountandSole’saccountwithBarclaysBankintheLesotho bytheLHDACEO,Sole.Inthecaseofthekeyintermediary,oneZM capitalofMaseru8(BarclaysBanksubsequentlytransferreditsinterests Bam,investigationsrevealedageneralpatternof60%ofthemoney inLesothotoStandardBank). thatwaspaidintoBam’saccountbeingtransmittedtoSoleveryshortly thereafter.ItwasestablishedincourtthatbetweenJanuary1991and Asfarasisknown,theamountrecoveredfromSoleinaciviljudgment April1991,SolereceivedC$493,000andhereceivedanother awardedagainsthiminOctober1999,andconfirmedonappealinApril C$188,000betweenJune1991andJanuary1998. 2001,wasZAR8.9million(thenworthUS$1,186,666.60).Inaddition AcresInternationalwasfinedZAR22million(US$2,933,333.30)on ThesourceofthisparticularbribewasaCanadianTNC,Acres conviction. International,whichwantedtosecurethecontractsfortheconstruction oftheKatseDam. Solealsoreceivedbribesfromothercompaniesinvolvedintheproject, TheLesothocorruptiontrialswillprobablyberememberedmoreforthe and,accordingtoamemberoftheprosecutingteam,7moretrialsare multiplicityofproceduralissuesraisedbythedefendantsthanforanyother expected.FirmsthathavebeenimplicatedincludetheHighlandsWater reason.Forthepurposeofastudyofmoneylaunderingingeneral,however, VentureGroup,whichcomprisesImpreglioImpresitGirolaofItaly, thetrialshaveanaddedsignificance,inthattheydemonstrate: HochtiefofGermany,BouyguesofFranceandBasilReadofSouth Africa.TheconsortiumisallegedtohavepaidSoleUS$375,000 • oneofthemodesbywhichfundsforlaunderingareraised; between1991and1998. • arelativelystraightforwardtransmissionsystemforthosefunds,involvingat TheLesothoHighlandsWaterProjectconsortium,whichincludesLTA- leastthreestages; GrinakerfromSouthAfricaandAlstonoftheUK,isallegedtohave bribedSolewithZAR6.6million(justoverUS$1millionasatApril • thepracticalchallengesofdetectingtheinfiltrationofillicitproceeds;and 2004).IntermediarieschargedincludeJacobusduPlooyandtwo • theevenmoredauntingtaskofinvestigatingthelaunderingtrailevenwhere Panamaniancompanies,namelyUniversalDevelopmentCorporationand an‘audit’trailexists. ElectroPowerCorporation,aswellasMaxCohen,ZMBamandMargaret Bam.Atthetimeofwriting,Cohen,whodidnotattendtheinitialhearings, Infact,inboththecaseagainstSoleandthatagainstAcres,theproofofmoney haddisappearedwithouttrace.ZMBamdiedduringthetrial. launderingwasaninevitablecomponentoftheprobativeprocessofthebribery Solewassentencedto18yearsinjailforreceivingmorethanZAR7.5 allegations.ThecrucialinformationwaslocatedinSwitzerland.Inadetailedcase million(US$1million)frominternationalcontractorsandconsultants. studypreparedforTransparencyInternational,FionaDarrochpointsoutthat:9 10 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica ObservationsontypologiesofmoneylaunderingintheSADCregion 11

AnapplicationtotheSwisscourtsforsuchinformationisacomplex taxevasion,transferpricing,prostitution,embezzlementofprivatefunds(private matter.Theprosecutionisnotpermittedtogoona‘fishingexpedition’, sectorcorruption)andinsiderdealing.Inadditiontothetwokindsofmoney trawlingthroughasetofbankaccountsinordertofindsufficient laundering,fundstransfersmayoccurlawfullyasoffshoreinvestments.Intransit, evidencetoenableittoconstructitscase.Itmustmakeitsapplication aswellaswhendepositedatthedestination,fundsoriginatingfromanyofthe withparticularity,givingthereasonswhichithasforsuspectingthat threesourcescouldbeindistinguishable.Contendingwithmoneylaundering activitieswithinanaccountwillrevealgroundsforbringingacriminal requiresthatauthoritiesinthesub-regiontakecognisanceofthenatureand prosecution.Wherethereasonsareinsufficientlydefined,information patternofalltheseactivities. intheaccountswillnotberevealed.Itisalsoimportanttonotethat whereanaccountcontainsmanyentriesandwithdrawalsofdifferent SouthernAfricahasalongexperienceofoutwardcapitalmovement.Itshistory sumsofmoney,tracingadirectconnectionbetweenpaymentswhich datesbacktocolonialdays,whenexploitationofcolonieswasanimportant issufficienttogiverisetotheinferenceofbriberycannotsometimes objective.Large-scalecapitalflightoutofMozambiqueandZimbabwehas beachieved. beenrecorded.InMozambique,itprobablyreacheditsclimaxfrom1974–8. CommentatorssuchasJosephHanlonhavewrittenontheabuseofthebanking Itshouldbenoted,however,thatSwitzerlandcanextendmutuallegalassistance sectorinillicittransfersbetweenMozambique,SouthAfricaandduring onthebasisofitsnationallawcoupledwithadeclarationofreciprocity.This thatperiod.11TheamountofmoneytransmittedoutofZimbabweandSouth maybehelpfulandwasusefulintheLesothocorruptioncases.Itshouldnot Africajustbeforeliberation,ineachcase,hasyettobequantified.12Thereare obscuretheenormityofthechallengethatcanemanatefromtransnational indicationsthatsomeofthemethodsusedincolonialplunderwereadopted transferoffundsofillicitorigin.OneneedonlyrefertotheAbachaembezzled byhighly-placedfunctionariesandsomeentrepreneurslongaftertheadvent fundscasetogetasenseofthechallenge.Theestimatedprejudicecausedby ofliberation. AbachathroughembezzlementandcorruptionwasUS$5.5billion.Thefunds weretracedtobanksinnofewerthan21countries!Switzerlandhasbeen Itisanestablishedfactthatthetransferoffundsiseasiestifaconvertible applaudedasoneofthemostco-operativeinlocatingthefundsandsecuring currencyisused.Globaltrendshaveshownthatthefavouredcurrencyinfund repatriation.AbachaalsodepositedfundsinAustria,theBahamas,Brazil, transfersistheUSdollar.Tworelateddevelopmentshavebeeninstrumentalin Canada,France,Germany,HongKong,Italy,Jersey,Kenya,Lebanon,Libya, openingupavenuesformoneylaunderingintheSADC.Oneistherelaxation, Liechtenstein,SaudiArabia,Singapore,Sweden,theUnitedArabEmirates, andinsomecases,abandonmentofexchangecontrolsandtheotheristhe theUnitedKingdomandtheUnitedStates. 10Thesuccess,albeitmodest, proliferationofcurrencyexchangeoutlets.Itisevidentthatsomeoftheoutlets achievedbytheNigerianauthoritiesinretrievingsomeoftheAbachafunds incountrieswithoutexchangecontrolshavebeenusedintheacquisitionof cannotbecompletelydisconnectedtotheopprobriumwithwhichAbacha’s hardcurrencyforonwardtransmissionbeyondthesub-region.SouthAfrican regimewasviewedbythetimeofhisdemiseandthetremendousgoodwill criminalgroupsareknowntohaveused casadecambiosinMozambiqueto enjoyedbytheObasanjogovernmentatthetimethatrecoveryrepresentations laundertheproceedsofcross-borderactivities,suchasvehicletheft.13Currency weremade. exchangeoutletshavealsobeenabusedinMalawi.TheauthoritiesinZimbabwe closeddownallsuchoutletsinNovember2002onthebasisthattheywere instrumentalinexternalisingforeigncurrency. Outgoing(andincoming)moneylaundering

Significantlaunderingofmoneyofteninvolvestransnationaltransfersbetween twoormorecountries.Twoimportanttypesofpredicateactivitycontributeto SocialSecurityCommissionirregularitiesinNamibia14 suchtransfers.Oneconcernstheproceedsofactivitiesuniversallyacknowledged ACommissionofEnquirywasmandatedbyNamibia’sPresident tobecriminal,suchasdrugtraffickingorfraud.Theothertypeinvolvesassets NujomatoinvestigateandreportontheoperationsoftheSocialSecurity derivedfromactivitiesthatmaybecriminalinthesourcecountry,butarenot Commission(SSC).Publichearingswereconductedinthefirsthalfof necessarilysoregardedinthedestinationcountry.Thelattercategoryincludes 12 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica ObservationsontypologiesofmoneylaunderingintheSADCregion 13

2003.AttheendofthehearingsareportwaspresentedtothePresident beneficiaries.Onecanseefromthishowcrime,andtheabsenceof butatthetimeofwritingithadnotbeenmadepublic.However,the propermanagementstructuresforthehiringandappointmentof printmediawidelyreportedthehearings.Someofthe‘shenanigans’ appropriatepersonnel,combinedwithpoorcorporategovernance, revealedshowedthathighrankingandwell-placedofficialswithinthe canfacilitatemoneylaundering.Thiscanariseinanysphereofthe SSC,middlemenandinsurancebrokers,receivedhugereturnsbyway financialandcommercialsectors. ofcommissionsforbusinessgeneratedthroughinvestmentsmadeon Afterthecommissionshadbeengeneratedthebeneficiarieswereable behalfoftheSSCthroughvariousinsurancecompanies. tolaunderthemoneyasaresultofavarietyoffavourablefactorsand TherevelationsduringtheCommissionofEnquirymakeitaclassic circumstances.Thefirstandmostimportantfactorwastheabsenceof casestudytoidentifythefactorsthatexposethefinancialand anti-moneylaunderingcriminallegislation.Thesecondwastheabsence commercialsectorsinNamibiatothelaunderingoftaintedmoney.It ofsuitableanti-corruptionprovisionsintheexistinglaw.Itispossible isalsoausefulcasestudyforanalysingandassessingthestrengthsand thatsomeoftheactivitiesofthepersonsconcernedcanbeprosecuted weaknessesofthesesectorsindetectingthelaunderingoftainted undertheprovisionsofthecurrentAnti-CorruptionOrdinance. moneyandotherillicitproceedsinNamibiagenerally.Itneedstobe However,someoftheactivitiesthatprobablytookplace,suchasthe pointedoutthatintermsoffinancialandcommercialactivity,Namibia abuseofinsideinformation,cannotbedealtwithassuchunder isacomparativelysmallbutsignificantmarket. Namibia’scriminallawasitnowstands. Thefactorsthatfacilitatedthemisappropriationofpublicfundsatthe Anemergentinsurancebroker,X,whohadusedhisclosefamily SSCcanbeexplainedagainstthebackgroundofpoororganisational connectionsintheSSCtodivertbusinesstohimself,investedhisfunds andmanagementstructures. inaccountsopenedinthenameofshellclosecorporations.Heused thesecorporationstoopentrustaccountswithalawfirm(runbyhis Theseincludetheappointmentofunqualifiedandinexperienced cousin)andtopurchasemotorvehicles,realestateandfurniturewithout personneltomakecrucialinvestmentdecisionsandtomanagethe raisingsuspicion.Intheabsenceofanti-moneylaunderingcriminal operationsoftheSSC,theappointmentofanineffectiveBoardwhich andregulatorylaw,thenon-bankingfinancialandcommercialservices couldbemanipulatedbytheexecutives,theabsenceofeffective sectorsarenotboundbyanyreportingobligationsinthefaceof managementstructures,andtheexistenceofcorruptionandnepotism suspicioustransactions.Thedealerships,estateagentsandretail withintheAuthority,whichfacilitatedthegrowthofasyndicatewithin furnitureshopswithwhichthebuddingbrokerdealt,aswellasthe theinstitutionthatunderminedtheCommissionbycolludingwith lawfirmwithwhomheopenedthetrustaccounts,wereunderno external‘entrepreneurs’intheinsurancesectortoperpetratefraudulent legalobligationtoreportthetransactions.Itismostimprobablethat dealsontheCommission’sbehalf,forthebenefitofitsassociates. thebankinginstitutionswouldhavesuspectedanyofthesubsequent TheBoarddidnotauthoriseanInvestmentsCommitteethatwasset depositsoftherespectivetakings.InthismannertheproceedsofX’s upwithintheAuthority.OnlyaselectmembershipoftheBoardwas corruptdealswereinsinuatedintothelegitimatebankingsystem privytoitsexistenceandoperations.Thosemembersintheknow through‘innocent’parties. probablybenefitedfromtheactivitiesthatwenton.Internalauditing structureswerepoor.Therewaslackofclarityabouttowhomthe AuditingUnitreported. TheexploitationofresourcesintheDemocraticRepublicofCongo Therewerepatentlyineffectivechecksandbalancesbuiltintothe TheeconomicactivitiesofvariousplayersintheDemocraticRepublicofCongo structuresoftheCommission,whichfacilitatedtheperpetrationofthe (DRC),whichfirstcametolightinthelate1990ssimultaneouslywiththeascent predicatefraudulentactivities.Inflatedcommissionsandkickbackswere toofficeofthelateLaurentKabila,continuetogeneratemuchinterestfor madeandexchangedandthensubsequentlylaunderedbythe scholarsofmoneylaunderinginthesub-region.Theemergingpicturehasbeen 14 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica ObservationsontypologiesofmoneylaunderingintheSADCregion 15 sketchedgraphicallyinvariousreportsofthepanelofexpertsmandatedby theUnitedNations(UN)SecurityCouncil. Report.SomeofthemhaveinvestedresourcesinrealestateinSouth Africa.AcommercialbankwithcloseconnectionstoaSADC governmenthasbeenabusedintheacquisitionandtransmissionof ExtractfromthereportoftheUNSecurityCouncilSpecialPanelon foreigncurrencybetweentheDRCandSouthAfrica. theexploitationofresourcesintheDRC,October2002 Thereportidentifiesandnamesthemembershipofthree‘elite networks’thathavecarvedoutseparatespheresofeconomiccontrol Organisedcrimeingeneral intheDRCoverthepastfouryears.“Theelitenetworks’griponthe DRC’seconomyextendsfarbeyondpreciousnaturalresourcesto Transnationalorganised(orsyndicated)crime—manifestedastheftandhijacking encompassterritory,fiscalrevenuesandtradeingeneral,”thePanel ofvehicles,narcoticstrafficking,illicitdealingingold,diamondsandother noted.PanelChairmanMahmoudKassemsaidtheactivitiesofthe preciousmineralsandillicitdealinginfirearmsandammunition—continued networksinvolvedhighlyorganisedanddocumentedsystemsof toaffectthesub-regionintheperiodunderreview.Itsincidenceisperceived embezzlement,taxfraud,extortion,kickbacks,falseinvoicing,asset- tobepartofaglobaltrenddemandingtheactiveattentionofsub-regional, strippingofstatecompaniesandsecretprofit-sharingagreements,and regionalandinternationalentities.Theactivitiesofsyndicatesaremostvisible thattheseactivitieswereorchestratedinamannerthatclosely inSouthernAfrica. resembledcriminaloperations.“Thenetworkscollaboratewith organisedcriminalgroups,someofthemtransnationalorganisations, EstimatesofthenumbersoforganisedcrimesyndicatesactiveinSouthAfrica inordertomaximiseprofits,”hestated,addingthattheyusethose varyfrom200to240.Themajorityspecialiseindrugtrafficking,vehicle-related criminalgroupsfordiscreetmilitaryoperations,moneylaundering, crimesandcommercialcrime.Othersaremoregeneralandshiftyintermsof illegalcurrencytransactions,counterfeitingoperations,armstrafficking, occupationalfocus.Atleast32syndicatesarebelievedtobeengagedin smugglingandmanyotheractivitiesaimedatpoliticaldestabilisation. transnationalcrimebeyondsub-SaharanAfrica.Thecriminalactivitiesof Thewareconomydirectedbythesenetworksfunctionsunderthecover approximately150syndicatesarecommittedprimarilyinsub-SaharanAfrica, ofarmedconflict,manipulationofethnictensionsandgeneralised particularlyinSouthernAfrica.Relationshipshavebeenestablishedbetween violencethatgenerateenormousprofitsfor“smallcoteriesofpowerful somesyndicatesandcriminalgangs.Syndicatesemploygangsinstreetlevel individualsorthecommercialwingonmilitaryinstitutions,”Mr.Kassem activitieswhiletheyremainactiveincoreareasofoperationandinco-ordinating said.TheactivitiesdraintheDRC’streasuryofrevenuesatthenational theactivitiesofdifferentgangs.Theevidencerecordedandacceptedbythe andlocallevelsandleavethepopulationwithoutbasicservices. courtintheCarlosCardosocaseinMozambiquehighlightsthis. TheadventofpeaceintheDRCisexpectedtoprovidebetter opportunitiestoinvestigatetheextentofmoneylaunderinginvolving RevelationsfromtheCarlosCardosomurdercase resourcesfromthecountry.Atthisstage,anecdotalevidenceexists ThiscasearoseoutoftheassassinationofCarlosCardoso,prominent thatmineralssuchasdiamondsandcoltanhavebeensmuggledoutof investigativejournalistandpublisher,andtheattemptedmurderofhis theDRC.Estimatesbymonitorsoftheinternationaldiamondtrade driver,CarlosManjate,inaMaputostreeton22November2000. arethatonaverage,85%oftheUS$1billionworthofroughdiamonds Theprosecutionproducedevidencetoshowthatthedecisionto extractedfromtheDRChavebeensmuggledouteveryyearbetween murderCardosowaspromptedbyhiseffortsinexposingthe 1999and2002. machinationsoftheorganisedcrimesyndicateresponsibleforthefraud Thekeystrategistsinthesmugglingandmoneylaunderingnetworks ontheBancoCommercialdeMozambique(BCM),whichresultedin arewellknownpersonalities,identifiedintheUNPanelofExperts’ thelossofMZM144billion(US$13million).Thefraudwascommitted 16 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica ObservationsontypologiesofmoneylaunderingintheSADCregion 17

ThetemptationtoportraySouthernAfricaasabreedinggroundfororganised inthefirsthalfof1996,justasthebankwasabouttobeprivatised. crimeshouldnotovershadowtheadvancesmadebythelawenforcement ThreeofCardoso’skillerswereimplicatedinthefraud.Twoofthem sectorincombatingtransnationalcrimeingeneralandmoneylaunderingin managedachainofcurrencyexchangebureaux. particular.Proactiveinitiativessuchasnewlegislation,alongwithregionalco- operation,areprovingincreasinglysuccessfulincounteringtransnationalcrime. Theevidencealsorevealedthatthevehicleinwhichtheassassins Theperiodunderreviewwascharacterisedbyincreasedco-operationbetween travelledtoandfromthesceneofthecrimehadbeenrobbed(hijacked) lawenforcementagenciesofSouthAfrica,Tanzania,Zimbabwe,Namibia, fromanemployeeofCESO-CEIMocambique,ConsultoriaeGestao, Malawi,SwazilandandMozambiquetoidentifyandmonitorroutesusedby inMaputo.ForthemurderofCardoso,theaccusedreceivedMZM1 internationalsyndicates.Someofthetrendsnotedasaresultofrecentinitiatives billion(US$41,670)andZAR600,000.Withpartofthemoney,the deservetobehighlighted. assassinsboughtseveralmotorvehiclesinMozambiqueandSouth Africa,ahouse,atelevisionsetandcellulartelephones.Oneofthe culpritsdepositedasmallamountoftheproceedsinabankaccount Terroristfunding:anoverview inMaputo. Evidencewasalsopresentedofanunsuccessfulattempt,inNovember Inparagraph4ofResolution1373(2001)theUNSecurityCouncilhighlighted 1999,onthelifeoftheBCM’slegaladviserforhispartinthefraud whatitcharacterisedas“thecloseconnectionbetweeninternationalterrorism expose.AfeeofZAR600,000hadbeenagreedforthemurderofDr andtransnationalorganisedcrime,illicitdrugs,moneylaundering,illegalarms AntonioAlbanoSilva. trafficking,andillegalmovementofnuclear,chemical,biologicalandother potentiallydeadlymaterials…”(emphasisadded). Theabuseofthebureauxdechangeintheprovisionofthebountyin bothcasesdidnotformpartoftheprosecutioncase,butitseems InSouthernAfrica,incidentsofdomesticterrorismovershadowthoseof likelythatthebureauxplayedacriticalrole. internationalterrorismintermsofgravity.ApartfromtheEastAfricancomponent Thesixaccused—AnibalAntoniodosSantosJunior,AyobAbdulSatar, oftheSADC,itisdebatablewhethersignificantfundingofinternationalterrorism CarlitosRachideCassamo(whopulledthetrigger),ManueldosAnjos hasoriginatedinthesub-region.Notwithstandingtheapparentlyexclusivefocus Fernandes,MomadAssifAbdulSatarandVicenteNarotamRamaya— ofResolution1373onthefundingofinternationalterrorism,totheexclusion wereallconvictedofmurder,attemptedmurderandassociationwith ofdomesticterrorism,thesituationregardingthelatterdeservesexamination. intenttocommitacrimeandweresentencedtolengthytermsof imprisonment. AnumberofexamplesofterroristfundingcanbeidentifiedinSouthernAfrica. Thereiscontroversyregardingthevalidityofsomeofthem,butthisshouldbe ThecourtorderedalltheaccusedtocompensatetheheirsofCarlos viewedagainstthebackgroundoftheenduringcontroversyastotheconcept CardosointhesumofMZM14billion(US$583,333)andtopay ofterrorismitself.Subjectivitypermeatestheidentificationofsourcesofterrorist MZM500million(US$20,833)toCarlosManjate,whowasleft funding.Inthefinalanalysis,terrorismcontinuestobedefinedsubjectively,in paralysedbygunshotinjuriestohisneck.Compensationwasalso termsofwhatareoftenparochialortransientsecuritypriorities, 16whichmay orderedagainsttwooftheaccusedimplicatedinthehijackingofthe occasionallyshiftfromtimetotime. getawayvehicle,worthUS$12,000.Allthepropertyprovedtohave beenacquiredbytheaccusedasaresultofthemurderwasforfeitto IntheSADCsub-region,thereisnocountrythatbetterillustratesthedilemma thestate.15 (thattheabsenceofauniversaldefinitioncauses)inidentifyingsourcesthan Eachoftheaccusedwasorderedtopaythecostsoftheprosecutionin theDRC.HowoneidentifiessourcesofterrorismintheDRCdependsonthe thesumofMZM800,000(US$33.33). standpointadopted.Thelong-heldviewofPresidentJosephKabilaisthatthe DRCisafflictedbyterrorismsponsoredbyUgandaandRwanda.17Intermsof thisview,thesecountrieshavesupportedsurrogateforcesthathavecommitted 18 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica ObservationsontypologiesofmoneylaunderingintheSADCregion 19

(andinsomecasescontinuetocommit)terroristacts.Anyothercountriesthat AstheFinancialActionTaskForceonMoneyLaundering(FATF)pointsout: haverenderedmilitaryandfinancialsupporttoUgandaandRwandacouldbe taintedassupportingterrorism.ABritishtelevisionstation,Channel4,alleged Theadvantagesthatgoldprovidesarealsoattractivetothemoney thatUgandaandRwandacontinuedtoreceivesignificantfinancialassistance launderer,thatis,thehighintrinsicvalue,convertibility,andpotential fromtheUnitedKingdom,andthatpartofthiscouldbeassistingbelligerents anonymityintransfers.Itisused,accordingtotheFATFexperts,both inthetroubledareasoftheeasternDRC.18 asasourceofillegalfundstobelaundered(throughsmugglingorillegal tradeingold)andasanactualvehicleforlaundering(throughthe OpponentsoftheKabilaregimeintheDRCwouldcontendthatgovernment outrightpurchaseofgoldwithillegalfunds).23 troopsandtheirallieshavealsobeenguiltyofterrorism,fundedoutofnational resourcesintheformofmineralsandtimber.ThereportsoftheUNPanelof Thesamecanbesaidofdiamonds.Thebluishpreciousstone,tanzanite,has ExpertsontheExploitationofNaturalResourcesintheDRC,citedabove, alsobeenlinkedtoillicitdealingsforterroristfunding.Atonestage,nearly supportthisview.The‘criminalelites’areallegedtohaveprivatisedtheconflict, 90%oftanzanitewassoldthroughtheparallelmarkets.Inconsequence,many orpartsofit.Theirprimarymotivationisaccesstopreciousresources. differentpeopleandgroups,includingsmugglersandterrorists,haveattempted toexploitthesituation.Anorganisationwhichisbelievedtofrontforal-Qaeda Beyondthestateandpoliticallycompromisedactors,terroristfinancinginthe hasmadehugeprofitsfromsalesoftanzaniteandmayhaveusedthemto DRCcanalsobelinkedtodrugtrafficking,armstrafficking,and“mafia-type financeactsofterrorism.(OsamaBinLaden’sone-timepersonalsecretary, wheelinganddealinginthecontextofthevastpotentialoftheDRC”.19 WadihElHage,isbelievedtohaveusedthecodename’‘Tanzanite’.) 24Fund transfersmayhavebeenprocessedthroughtheubiquitousbureauxdechange, Othersourcesoftheresourcestosustainterrorismcanbeidentifiedelsewhere retailandwholesalebusinessesandimport/exportoutlets. inSouthernAfrica.Theroleplayedbydiamondsinrevivingandsustaining UnitainAngolaiswelldocumented.Theprospectofgainfulextractionof Charitabledonationshaveincreasinglycometoberegardedasanimportant preciousresourceshasluredforeigninterventionintotheatresofpre-existing avenueforanonymouscollectionofresourcesintheformoffundsandclothing conflictandprecipitatedtheopeningupoffreshconflictsinbothAngolaand tosupportterroristactivity.Thesignificanceofthissourceintheregionhasnot theDRC.Avirtualwareconomyhasbeennurtured.Beneficiariesofthis beenquantified,althoughanecdotalindicationsapparentlyexist.Ithasnot economyrangefrompoliticalleaderstomultinationalcorporations,intermediary beenconclusivelylinkedtoterroristfunding.Themostthatcanbesaidisthat networks,localmilitarycommanders,warlordsandorganisedcrimesyndicates. itmayhavebeenusedinrespectoftanzanite.Itisarguablethateventsin Zimbabwesincemid-2000aresymptomaticofgovernment-sponsoreddomestic Theconflictsaroundextractiveresourceshaveimpactedonthefortunesof terrorism.Terroristactivityischaracterisedbythewidespreaduseofa civiliansinboththehostcountriesandtheexploitingcountries. 20Insome government-trainedmilitia,thepoliceandthearmy. cases,theeffecthasbeentoyieldsecondaryconflictintheformofterrorism directedatcivilians.Thishasbeenthecasewhereciviliansorcivilianstructures areperceivedtobeahindrancetoresourceexploitation.Inothercases,the Recommendationsandconcludingobservations localenvironment,economyandpublicwelfarehavebeenneglectedasthe focusisplacedexclusivelyonresourceexploitation. Theobservationsmadeinthestudyonwhichthischapterisbasedsuggestthat SADCstateshaveyettoadoptcomprehensiveresponsestomoneylaundering. Atthesametime,organisationsinvolvedininternationalterrorismhavetaken Attheveryleast,theincidenceofthepredicatecriminalandotherunlawful acommercialinterestinpreciousextractiveresourcessincethemid-1970s. activitieswhichyieldfundsforlaunderingshouldbemeasured.Theexistence Lebanesegroupshavebeenactiveindiamondexploitation,orratherextortion ofadualeconomyinmanypartsofthesub-regionshouldbeconsideredin ofproceedsfromdiamondsales,derivedfromtheWestAfricanstatesofLiberia formulatingstrategiesagainstmoneylaundering.Thereareindicationsthat andSierraLeoneandCoted’Ivoire. 21Severalstudieshavelinkedal-Qaeda participationintheformaleconomy,anditsinstitutions,isnotashighasis withthetradeingoldanddiamondsfromtheDRC,TanzaniaandSouthAfrica.22 assumedbyemerginganti-moneylaunderinglaws. 20 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica ObservationsontypologiesofmoneylaunderingintheSADCregion 21

ItissuggestedthatSADCstatesshould: • improvednationalandregionalcapacitiestocollect,analyseand disseminatecrimestatisticsthatcanhelptoformulatepolicies. • buildontheestablishedconsensusthatmoneylaunderingthreatenseffective governmentandsocio-economicadvancementeverywhere; Itappearsthatintheprocessofenactinglawsagainstmoneylaundering,the roleoffinancialinstitutionsinmoneylaunderingcontrolneedstobecarefully • improvemethodsofperiodicallymonitoringandmeasuringthemagnitude appraisedtopreventimposingunmanageableduediligenceobligationson ofmoneylaunderingactivities.Animportantelementistheofficialcollection, them.Thereismuchtobesaidfortheviewthattheresponsibilitiesofbanks collationandanalysisofdata.Atpresentthiscapacityisgenerallypoorand shouldbelimitedtokeepinggoodrecordsandbeinggoodcorporatecitizens,by: insomecountriesithasalmostbeenabandoned.Moneylaundering detectionandcontrolisbutapartofgenerallawenforcement,sothe • reportingsuspicioustransactionsofanysort;and capacitytoachieveitisaffectedbyanyfactorthatimpactsonlaw enforcementcapacityaswell.Ifpoliceperformanceinotherspheresis • reportingcrimestolawenforcementagencies. mediocre,itislikelytobeevenpoorerinrespectofmoneylaundering.As amodeofcriminalconduct,moneylaunderinghastheclosestrelationship Itisdoubtfulthatbanksofthesizeencounteredinthesub-regionwillbeable, tocorruptionthananyotherformofmisconduct. intheshorttomediumterm,togobeyondbasic‘knowyourcustomer’vigilance totheprofilingenvisagedindevelopedsystems. Itshouldbepointedoutthatcertainmeasurescanassistinpre-emptingtheinfusion ofillicitfunds,butthesehingeonthelevelofco-operationlinkagesthatare Outsidethebankingsector,thecapacitytoimplementmeasuresbeyondthe developedbetweensourceanddestinationcountriesofmoneyforlaundering. basiclevelislikelytobemoreuneven.Thesizeofinsurancecompaniesvaries considerably,asdoesthatofcurrencyexchangeoutlets(bureauxdechange). Itappearsthatgiventhecommitmentinthesub-region,SADCstatescan: Tobesure,thelargerplayersinthesesectorsmaybeabletoestablishand maintainaforensicanalysisfunction,buttheyarecertaintobeaminority.In • DevelopsustainablecapacityintheSADCsub-regiontoaddressmoney theshorttomediumterm,profilingandinvestigativeresponsibilitiesshouldbe launderingatnationally,regionallyandinternationally; allocatedtogovernmentregulatoryandlawenforcementagenciessuchasthe policeandintelligenceagencies. • GivepracticaleffecttothedeclaredcommitmenttoratifytheUN ConventionAgainstTransnationalOrganizedCrimebyharmonising Theinvestigativecapacityofthepubliclawenforcementagenciesevidently supportivelegislativeinstrumentsatnationallevel.Inthisrespectthe requiresupgradinginmanypartsofthesub-region.Adegreeofspecialisation ratificationofsub-regionalprotocolswouldsubstantiallymovetheprocess indetectingsuspicioustransactionsandforensicinvestigationneedstobebuilt forward.ProminentexamplesincludetheSADCProtocolsAgainst up.Asregardstheformer,theuseofinformationtechnologyisincreasing.A Corruption(2001),onExtradition(2002)andonLegalAssistanceinCriminal numberofpossibilitieshavebeenexploredinrecenttimes,forexample Matters(2002); involvingtheuseofcomputersoftwaretoalertcomplianceofficersand • Formulateimplementationplansonmoneylaunderingandseriouseconomic detectivestoeconomiccrimeandeventotracemoneylaundering.Oneofthe crime,takingintoaccountlawenforcementcapacityandshortcomings. companiesthathasdevelopedinvestigativeanalysissoftwareisUnitedKingdom- Someprioritieshavealreadyemergedinthecourseofjointpoliceoperations. basedi2.Itclaimsthatitssoftware‘enhancestheanalyticalcapabilitiesofan 26 TheUNOfficeforDrugsandCrime,whichhasdonemuchworkinassisting organisationandenablesunderstandingofcomplexandvolumedata’. policeagenciestoidentifydeficienciesinmutualco-operation,has Financialinstitutionsandeconomiccrimeinvestigatorscouldfindthiskindof pinpointedasetofpriorityareasincluding:25 softwareuseful.

• improvedinformationtechnologyandinformationsharingcapacity; • comprehensiveandrecurrenttrainingofborderandportofficialsinrisk analysisandscreening;and 22 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica ObservationsontypologiesofmoneylaunderingintheSADCregion 23

Notes • CremeMercedesBenzmodel300D,registrationMLS94-19; • Grey-blueToyotaConquest,registrationKNB401GP; 1 AnexampleisCGoredema,MoneylaunderinginEasternandSouthernAfrica: • FiatUno(damaged); Anoverviewofthethreat,InstituteforSecurityStudies(ISS),Pretoria,2003. • PortableCasioRadio-TV,modelTV-880U,seriesno.9171730A; 2 Insomecases,repositoriesofstatisticsoneconomiccrimeandcorruptionare • Ericssoncellphone,Series1130401-bvca,08010212CE0682; dispersedbetweenthepolice,prosecutingauthorities,andspecialised • Nokia6210cellphone,no.449214/20/637345/4; agencies,suchasanti-corruptioncommissions. • Nokia6210cellphone,no.350611/20200589/8; • Nokia6210cellphone,no.350146/20/706757/7; 3 TLeggett,Perspectivesonsupply:ThedrugtradeinJohannesburg,Durbanand • Nokia6210cellphone,no.350769/20903494/7; CapeTown,inTLeggett(ed.),DrugsandcrimeinSouthAfrica:Astudyinthree • Nokia8210cellphone,no.449306/10/423617/9; cities,ISS,Pretoria,2002. • Nokia8210cellphone,noreferencenumber; 4 Overaperiodoftwoyears. • Nokia3210cellphone,noreferencenumber; • GreenandwhiteColmanKeepCold; 5 FromAStanding,ThesocialcontradictionsoforganisedcrimeontheCape • BlueandwhitesmallColman; Flats,ISS,Pretoria,2003.Thepapercanbefoundat. • Xiricotelevisionset,modelxbw1299,no.10369906; • BlackArtechH92WorldReceiverportableradio; 6 Themostrecentrevelationofthetrendwaspublishedinanarticleby • GreyandblackRicardoPA982pocketradio; prominentjournalistAllisterSparks.ASparks,ZimbabweslipsintoZairisation, • CasioRadio-TV,modelTV-770C,seriesno.3620098A; TheStar,8October2003.Thearticlecanbefoundat. • CasioRadio-TV,modelTV-880N,seriesno.9171723A. 7 Durbanadvocate,GuidoPenzhornSC. ThecourtalsopermittedthestatetosearchforandseizeaMercedesBenz 8 TheamounttransferredtotheMaseruaccountwasZAR90,000. vehicle,registrationMLS-94-19. 9 FionaDarrochinadraftcasestudyforTransparencyInternational,TheLesotho 16 The1999Anti-TerrorismandEffectiveDeathPenaltyActintheUnitedStates corruptiontrials:Acasestudy,unpublished,May2003,atp28. describesterroristactivityasactivitywhichthreatensthenationalsecurityofthe UnitedStates(italicsadded). 10 EJoyce,Recoveringstolenassets:Anoverview,UNODCAnnexIII,2001,pp 14-16. 17 AsstatedintheinitialreportsubmittedbytheDRCtotheCounter-Terrorism Committee(hereafterDRCInitialreport)incompliancewithparagraph6ofthe 11 InaseriesofarticlesthatappearedinMeticalinSeptember2001. UNSecurityCouncilResolution1373,2001,dated26December2001.A 12 AtthetimeofwritinginApril2004,theSouthAfricangovernmenthad supplementaryreportsubmittedon31March2003didnotretractthis extendedanamnestytoindividualsandcorporationsthatmighthave assertion. transferredmoneyoutofthecountryinviolationofexchangecontrol 18 Channel4documentary,Congo’sKillingFields,shownbytheSouthAfrican regulationsbeforeandafterdemocratisationin1994. BroadcastingCorporationprogrammeSpecialAssignmenton9September2003. 13 SeePGastrow&MMosse,Mozambique:Threatsposedbythepenetrationof 19 DRCInitialreport,p.6. criminalnetworks,unpublishedpaperpresentedattheISSseminaron OrganisedCrime,CorruptionandGovernanceintheSADCregion,Pretoria 20 CGoredema,Diamondsandotherpreciousstonesinarmedconflictsandlaw 18-19April2002. enforcementco-operationinSouthernAfrica,ISS,Pretoria,2002,pp.2-3. 14 Basedonacommissionedreportonanti-moneylaunderingcapacityin 21 AmoredetailedaccountissetoutinareportbyGlobalWitness,Forafew Namibia(July2003). dollarsmore:Howal-Qaedamovedintothediamondtrade,April2003. 15 Thefollowinggoodsseizedfromtheaccusedwereforfeitedtothestate: 22 SeetheGlobalWitnessreport;alsoPBagenda,MoneylaunderinginSouthern • LightgreyVolvomodel960A,registrationKWY870GP; Africa:ThecaseofTanzania(unpublishedreporttobeincludedina • MetallicgreyVolvomodel570,registrationMLI-29-46; forthcomingISSmonographprofilingmoneylaunderinginSouthernAfrica). 24 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica 25

23 QuotedintheGlobalWitnessreport,opcit. CHAPTER2 24 WadihelHageiscurrentlyservingalengthytermofimprisonmentintheUnited StatesforhispartintheembassyatrocitiesinEastAfricain1998. BOTSWANA’S LEGISLATIVE CAPACITY 25 UnitedNationsOfficeonDrugsandCrime(UNODC),Strategicprogramme TO CURB MONEY LAUNDERING frameworkoncrimeanddrugsforSouthernAfrica2003,UNODC,Vienna,2003, pp.18-21. KamogedisoMokongwa 26 See.

Introduction

Theconceptofmoneylaundering,thoughfamiliartomanylegalandfinancial systemsintheFirstWorld,isrelativelynewintheThirdWorld.Botswanais viewedasashiningexampleofdemocracy,acountrythatemergedfromragsto riches.Thishasledpeople,bothlocallyandinternationally,tobelievethatthere isnoseriousfinancialcrimeinBotswana.TomostcitizensofBotswana,money launderingisnotsuchacommonoccurrenceastowarrantlegislativeattention. TheCriminalCodeofBotswana(Cap.08:01)doesnotaddressmoneylaundering oritsrelatedoffences.Itcannotthereforebeeasyforfinancialinstitutionstotake measurestodealwithmoneylaunderingwithoutclearpolicyorlegislation.

Provisionsthathaveabearingonmoneylaunderingarefoundinsevenpiecesof legislation,namely:

• theBankingAct(Cap.46:04); • theBankofBotswanaAct(Cap.55:01); • theProceedsofSeriousCrimeAct(PSCA)(Cap.08:03); • theCorruptionandEconomicCrimeAct(Cap.08:05)(CECA); • theExtraditionAct(Cap.09:03); • theBanking(Anti-MoneyLaundering)Regulations(S.I.No.17of2003);and • theMutualAssistanceinCriminalMattersAct(MACMA)(Cap.08:04). 26 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Botswana 27

Existinginstitutionalmechanismstodetectandcontrol Section17doesnotdefine’‘designatedbodies’butitstatesthatthesection moneylaundering appliesto: Definitionofmoneylaundering Apersonorbodyofpersonswhosebusinessconsistsoforincludesthe provisionofservicesinvolvingtheacceptanceorholdingofmoneyor Inorderforfinancialinstitutionstobeabletocurbmoneylaundering,thelaw propertyfororonbehalfofotherpersonsorwhosebusinessappears mustprovideanunambiguousdefinitionoftheconcept.Sections14and17 totheMinistertobeliabletobeusedforthepurposeofcommittinga oftheProceedsofSeriousCrimeAct(PSCA)dealwithmoneylaundering. crime. Section14stipulatesthatapersoncommitsmoneylaunderingifhe: Inshort,adesignatedbodyisanybusinessthat,itappearstotheMinister,is • engages,directlyorindirectlyin: liabletobeingusedforthepurposesofcommittingaseriousoffence.Itisnot • atransactionthatinvolvesmoney,or clearhowtheMinisterreachesthatconclusion.Designatedbodiesinclude, • anyotherpropertythatistheproceedsofaseriousoffence; amongothers,anybanklicensedundertheBankingAct,savingsbanksorpost • receives,possesses,concealsorbringsintoBotswana,anymoney offices,registeredstockbrokers,long-terminsurancebusinessspecifiedunder orpropertythatistheproceedsofaseriouscrimeandtheperson theInsuranceIndustryAct(Cap.46:01),foreignexchangebusinesseslicensed knowsoroughttoreasonablyknowthatsuchmoneyorproperty undertheBankofBotswanaActoranyotherpersonorbodyastheMinister isderivedorrealizedfromanunlawfulactivity. mayprescribebyorder.

TheActdoesnot,however,specifywhatconstitutesanunlawfulactivity. TheScheduletothePSCAfurtherlistsbusinessrelationships,transactionsand servicesundersection17(3).Therefore,anypersonorbusinessthatisinvolved Section15ofthePSCAisconcernedwiththeconcealmentofmoneyor insuchbusinessrelationships,transactionsandservices,isadesignatedbody. property.Subsection(2)definesconcealmentofmoneyorpropertytoinclude Theseinclude,interalia,lending,financialleasing,moneytransmissionservices, concealmentordisguiseofthenature,source,location,disposition,movement, participationinshareissuesandtheprovisionofservicesrelatedtosuchissues, ownershiporanyrightswithrespecttosuchmoneyorproperty. safekeepingandadministrationofsecurities,alltypesofdirectlifeassurance, etc.Itmustbenotedthatthesectiondoesnotseemtodirectlyprovideforlaw Itmaybearguedthatapersoncanonlyconcealordisguisethenature,source, firms,whichmayholdmoneyforclientsintheirtrustaccounts. location,dispositionmovement,ownershiporanyrightswithrespecttosuch moneyorpropertyifheorsheknowsthatthemoneyorpropertyinquestion istainted,dirtyorsomewhatrelatedtoanunlawfulactivity. Proofofidentity

Thedefinitionofmoneylaunderingmaybeweak,butitisfortifiedbythe Intermsofsection17(6)ofthePSCA,adesignatedbodyisobligedtotake subsectiondealingwithconcealingordisguisingtheoriginoflaunderedmoney reasonablemeasurestoobtaintherequiredproofofidentityofapersonwith orproperty. whomitproposestoenterintoabusinessrelationshiportoprovideservicesof akindspecifiedintheSchedule.However,subsection6onlyapplieswhere Eventhoughbanks,buildingsocieties,insuranceinstitutionsandprofessional theservicesareinrespectofasingletransactionoraseriesoftransactions intermediariesinBotswanaarevulnerabletomoneylaundering,theyareguided whichare,orappeartobe,linkedtoanamountintheaggregateprescribedin onhowtoidentifytaintedmoneyorproperty. theregulation.

InstitutionsregulatedbyFinancialServicesCentres(FSCs)includebanks, Further,section44oftheBankingActobligesabanktoopenaccountsand insurancecompaniesandbuildingsocieties.Section17ofthePSCAlumps acceptsecuritydepositsorrentoutsafedepositboxesonlywhenthebankhas themtogetheras‘designatedbodies’. establishedtheidentityofthepersoninwhosenamethefundsorsecurities 28 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Botswana 29 aretobecreditedordepositedortheidentityofthelesseeofasafedeposit Regulation12(2)oftheBanking(Anti-MoneyLaundering)Regulationsrequires box.Whereabankisnotsatisfiedwiththetrueidentityofacustomerinterms afinancialinstitutiontocompletesuchformsastheBankofBotswanamay oftheAct,itisrequiredtoclosetheaccountorsecuritydepositorterminate prescribetorecordanoutwardtransferoraforeigncurrencypaymentforany theleaseofthesafedepositboxandreportthemattertotheCentralBank. foreigncurrencyreceiptsorfundsfromexternalsources.Wherethetransaction involvesanamountofBP10,000ormore,thecustomermustproducefull Thetrueidentityofthecustomerwillassistthefinancialinstitutionindetecting detailsofthetransactionincludingthename,identitynumber,purpose,address whetherornotthemoneyisfromanunlawfulactivity. andotherdetailsofthetransaction.Whateverrecordsareobtainedfromthe clientshallbekeptasoriginals,storedonmicrofilmoracomputerisedformfor Regulations5-9oftheBanking(Anti-MoneyLaundering)Regulationsalsodeal aperiodoffiveyearssothattheymaybeusedduringaninvestigationifthe withcustomeridentification.Theyobligeabank,whenestablishingbusiness needarises. relations,torequestfromacustomercertaindocumentstoprovetheiridentity. Thisrequirementistoensurethatbanksarenotusedtolaundertaintedmoney. Whereabankfailstoestablishtheidentityofacustomer,itisrequiredtoclose Anonymousaccountsandsuspiciousactivities theaccountordenythefacilitiesinquestion.Onemethodbywhichthebank TheBanking(Anti-MoneyLaundering)Regulationsprohibitfinancialinstitutions mayverifythenamesandaddressesofitscustomerisbyobtainingareference fromopeninganonymousaccountsoraccountsinobviouslyfictitiousnames. fromawell-knownprofessional,anemployerofthecustomer,aknown Further,afinancialinstitutionistoreporttotheBankofBotswana(BoB)and customerofthebankoracustomaryauthoritythatknowstheapplicant. theFinancialIntelligenceAgency(FIA)anytransactionsbytheircustomers involvinglargeamountsofmoneyorsuspiciousactivities.TheThirdSchedule Reportingofexcessamountofcashorproperty totheRegulationslistscertainactivitiesthatarereferredtoas ‘suspicious activities’.Theseincludethefollowing: Section17(14)ofthePSCArequiresadesignatedbodythatisapartytoa transactioninvolvinganamountofmoneythatexceedsanamountprescribed, • suspiciouscustomerbehaviour,e.g.,ifacustomerhasanunusualor fromtimetotime,toreportthedetailsofthetransactiontotheDirectorateon excessivelynervousdemeanourorbehavesabnormally; CorruptionandEconomicCrime(DCEC)andtotheRegulatoryAuthority.No • ifacustomer’spermanentaddressisoutsideBotswana; regulationsprescribingsuchamountshavebeenmadeyet. • ifacustomermakesalargecashdepositwithoutcountingthecash; Atapracticallevel,however,whereacustomerdepositsanamountexceeding BP10,000(approximatelyUS$2500)mostbankswillinquirefromtheclient • awiretransferthatmoveslargesumstosecrecyhavenssuchastheCayman howthemoneywasacquired.Thispracticeshouldnotbewaived,regardless Islands,HongKong,Luxembourg,PanamaorSwitzerland; ofthetypeofcustomerorhisidentity.Thereareoccasionalreporteddeviations, suchasthereportedcaseofaBP50,000(US$12,500)depositbyaGovernment • ifanemployeelivesalavishlifestylethatcouldnotbesupportedbyhisor Ministerintoapersonalbankaccountthatappearsnottohavebeenbrought herremuneration;or totheattentionoftheDCEC.Inconsequence,itwasneverinvestigated. • ifanemployeeavoidstakingvacations.

BarclaysBankofBotswanahasindicatedthatsomeofitsmoneylaundering Afinancialinstitutionisfurtherrequiredtodesignateoneemployeeasamoney controlpracticesarebasedoninstructionsfromitsBritish-basedheadoffice. launderingreportingofficerwhoservesasacontactpersononmoneylaundering Asfarasthebankisconcerned,itspracticeswouldnotbeaffectedbythe mattersbetweenthefinancialinstitutionandtheBoB,theFIAandtheBotswana absenceofanti-moneylaunderinglawsinthecountry:iftheparentbank Police.AfurtherrequirementoftheRegulationsisforthefinancialinstitution providedinternationalguidelinestobefollowed,itwouldcomply. totrainitsstaff,irrespectiveofthelevelofseniority,ontheimportanceof 30 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Botswana 31 reportinganysuspicioustransactionstothemoneylaunderingreportingofficer. Thiscaseisstillcontinuingaftermorethaneightyearsofinvestigations; TheRegulationsfurthersetoutprogrammesforstafftraining. meanwhile,RabanaisemployedinSouthAfricaandhisfamilycontinuesto enjoythebenefitsoflivingatShoshong. Anti-Moneylaunderingmeasuresandpractices Casessuchastheseindicatethatcorruptionisrampantandthatthereare indeedproceedsavailableforlaundering. TheBanking(Anti-MoneyLaundering)Regulationsobligefinancialinstitutions toputinplaceanti-moneylaunderingmeasuresandadoptsuchpracticesas Themagnitudeofcapitalflightthatislinkedtocorruptionisnotfullyunderstood arenecessaryforthepreventionofmoneylaundering. inBotswana,especiallyasnosurveyhasbeenconductedtorevealwhether suchanactivitytakesplaceinthecountry. Factorsthatcreateexposuretomoneylaundering

Eventhoughtherelevantpiecesoflegislationseemtobeaddressingmoney Capacityofauthoritiestodetectmoneylaundering laundering,amajorweaknessisthattheredoesnotseemtobeanyconnection betweenthelawsandwhatactuallyhappensontheground.Asurveyof TheCECAempowerstheDCECtoinvestigateanypersonwherethereare stakeholdersrevealedignoranceoftheconceptofmoneylaunderingandthe reasonablegroundstosuspectthatthepersonmaintainsastandardofliving relevantlaws. higherthaniscommensuratewithhismeans.Thisrequirement,thoughit appearstoempowertheDCEC,issomewhatlimitinginthesensethatwherea Anecdotalevidencesuggeststhatthereisahighlevelofeconomiccrimeand personsuchasthebusinessmanreferredtoabove,claimsthathislavishlifestyle corruptioninthecountry.Itisevidentthatthereisasignificantnumberof isfromaloan-sharkingbusiness,theinvestigationmaynotyieldanything.The individualsinpositionsofpowerthatlivebeyondtheirmeans,withmultiple DCECdoesnotseemtohaveenjoyedmuchsuccessininvestigatingthosein ownershipofcostlyresidentialpropertiesbeingcommon.Thesourceoftheir higherpositionsofpower. incomecannotbeestablished.Someareknowntohaveestablishedcharitable organisationsthatdonatehugeamountsofmoneywithoutidentifiablesources. Further,theuseofcriminallawtopunishmoneylaunderinghaslimitations.In Otherlavishacquisitionsnotedincludeaeroplanes.Allthesehaveraiseda otherjurisdictions,suchasSouthAfrica,civillawisusedtotakeawaythe majorchallengetothepoliceandtheDCEC. proceedsofcrimefromlaunderers.Itismoredifficulttoprovebeyond reasonabledoubt,asthecriminallawrequires,thatthemoneyinquestion Twoofthewell-publicisedcasesinvolvinghigh-rankingofficialswereboth comesfromillicitactivities,thanitistoestablishaclaimsufficientforacivil connectedtopublicworksinBotswana.The Statev.Kemokgatla,involveda forfeiture. constructioncompany,Zakem,thatbribedKemokgatla,thethen-Directorof Roads,toawarditamultimillionPulacontract.Kemokgatlaacceptedthebribe Itmust,however,benotedthatCECAempowerstheDCECtoinvestigateany andbuilthimselfamassivedoublestoreyhouseinGaboronewiththeproceeds. allegedsuspectedoffenceundertheAct,oranyotheroffencedisclosedduring Constructionofthehouseraisedthesuspicionofbribery.TheManagingDirector suchaninvestigation.Therefore,eventhoughtheCECAmainlyprovidesfor ofZackemturnedastatewitnessduringthetrial.Kemokgatlalosthisappealto publicbodies,ortheActconfinesthepowersoftheDCECtotheinvestigation theHighCourtin2003butthehouseinquestionisstillregisteredunderhis ofallegationsofcorruptioninpublicbodies,anoffenceofmoneylaundering nameattheDeedsOffice. maybeinvestigatedevenifitdoesnotinvolveapublicbody.Aplausible interpretationoftheActisthatamoneylaunderingoffencemaybeinvestigated Theothercorruptioncaseledtolitigation,inStatev.Rabana.Rabanawasan if,duringaninvestigationofcomplaintsallegingcorruptioninapublicbody, AssistantManagingDirectoroftheBotswanaHousingCorporationwhenhe thereisevidencethattheoffenceofmoneylaunderingisbeingcommitted. waschargedwithcorruption.Whatledtohisarrestwasthelavishlifestylehe led.HisfamilyspentholidaysinDisneylandandhebuiltamassivestructureat Further,theActprovidesthatifduringtheinvestigationofanoffenceunder hishomevillage,Shoshong.Hishousewaslatertermed ‘ShoshongSunCity’. theAct,anotheroffenceisdisclosed,theofficerisempoweredtoarrestwithout 32 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Botswana 33 awarrant,anypersontheofficerreasonablysuspectstobeguiltyofother suspectsorpropertythatmaybeconfiscated,freezingofassetsandexecution offence.Itmaybearguedthatmoneylaunderingisincludedinthewords‘any ofrequestsforsearchandseizures.Section30(a)providesforarequestbya otheroffence’. foreigncountryforsearchandseizureoftaintedpropertiessituatedinBotswana. TheActdoesnotdefine‘taintedproperty’. ItmustbenotedthattheActdoesnotempowertheDCECtoinvestigatemoney launderingifitdoesnottakeplacewithinpublicbodies.Thisisanunfortunate Prosecutorshaveidentifiedpracticaldifficultiesinimplementingtheprovisions situationbecause,theDCEC,beinganindependentbodywithitsownbudget, ofsection3. canattractthecreamofthecroptofightcorruptionandmoneylaundering.

ThepossibilityofconflictsoverturfbetweenthepoliceandtheDCECcannot Capacityoffinancialandrelatedinstitutionstodischarge beignored.Aneffectivecampaignagainstmoneylaunderingwillrequirethat theirresponsibilitieseffectively theresponsibilityofdealingwithmoneylaunderingbestreamlined,sothat technicalcapacitycanbeprovidedtotheappropriateagency. ThePSCAandtheBanking(Anti-MoneyLaundering)Regulationsprovidefor capacitybuildingbythefinancialinstitutionsandforthemtodesignatean Section8(1)ofthePSCAempowerstheAttorney-Generaltoapplytoacourt,’ex officerasamoneylaunderingofficerandtotrainmembersofstaffonmoney parte,forarestrainingorderwhereapersonischargedwith,orisabouttobe launderingissues.However,researchrevealedthatsomeemployeesoffinancial chargedwith,aseriousoffence.Theinvestigatingofficermuststatethathe institutionswerenotawarethattherewassuchadesignatedmoney-laundering reasonablybelievedthatthedefendantreceivedorderivedproceedsfromthe officer,ortherequirementtoappointsuchanofficer. commissionofanoffenceandhemustidentifythepropertythathereasonably believestorepresenttheproceedsreceivedorderivedbythedefendantfrom Compliancewiththeminimalstatutoryrequirementmayalsonotbegood theoffence.However,theuseofrestrainingordershasproveddifficultin enough.Thelegislativerequirementtohaveonepersondesignatedasamoney practice. launderingofficermeansthatifthatperson,whoislikelytobeaseniorbank official,isawayfromthebank,therewillbeno-onetodealwithmoney Section2ofthePSCAdefinestheterm‘seriousoffence’asanoffencefor launderingrelatedissues.Itisadvisabletodesignatetwopersonssothatoneis whichthemaximumpenaltyisdeathorimprisonmentforlessthantwoyears. alwaysavailable.Failuretodosomaybeinterpretedasbanksnottakingmoney Thisdefinitionisnothelpfultofinancialinstitutionsinthatmostoffencesfall launderingseriously. withinit.Itcanbearguedthatthelegislature,whenenactingthelaw,didnot havealloffenceswithimprisonmentforlessthantwoyearsinmind.Therefore Atthetimeofwriting,therewerestillbankswithouttrainingprogrammeson thelegislaturemustnarrowittofinancialcrimesincludingmoneylaundering moneylaundering,orwithtrainingprogrammesofwhichemployeeswerenot andterrorismoffences. aware.enodesignatedmoneylaundering.Intheinsuranceindustry,asinthe commercialsector,therewerenodesignatedmoney-launderingofficersand Insofarascross-borderissuesareconcerned,section20ofthePSCAprovides employeesdidnotseemtoknowwhatmoneylaunderingisallabout. formutualassistancebycountriesinrelationtoconfiscationandrestraining ordersregardingoffencesequivalenttoaseriousoffenceinBotswana,asdefined ThoughtheDCEC’sindependentbudgetmakesitlikelytoattractqualified intheAct. staffsuchasforensicfinancialinvestigators,financiallawyers,economists,etc., itcannotofferthesalariesdemandedbyprofessionalsintheseareas.Aswith Section3oftheMACMAempowerstheMinistertomakeregulationsformutual otherpublicsectoremployees,theDCECstaffsalaryscalesaresetbyCentral assistanceincriminalmatterstoanycountrywithwhichBotswanahasmade Government. arrangements.TheobjectivesoftheActaretofacilitatetheprovisionto,and offerby,Botswanaofinternationalassistanceincriminalmatters,including ItisthereforesuggestedthataccordingtheDCECthekindofindependence obtainingevidence,documents’locationandidentificationofwitnessesor enjoyedbyinstitutionssuchastheSeriousFraudOffice(SFO)inEnglandwould 34 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Botswana 35 goalongwaytoensurethatitisabletodevelopthecapacityandthetechnical intheResolutionintolaw.Inareportdated22December2001totheUN skillstoeffectivelydischargeitsaddedresponsibilities. SecurityCouncil,pursuanttoparagraph6ofResolution1373concerning counterterrorism,Botswanareportedthatithadtakenstepstoimplementthe Further,eventhoughtheBankingActreferstotheDCECastheFinancial Resolution.However,thereportrevealedstepstakenbefore2001andno InvestigatingAuthority,theActintermsofwhichtheDCECwasestablished legislationoncounter-terrorismmeasureshasbeenenactedpost-September doesnotconceiveofitinthisway.ThisraisesthepossibilityoftheDCEC’s 2001.Botswanacommitteditselftofullyandeffectivelyimplementingthe powersastheFIAbeingcalledintoquestion.Thereisaneedtorectifythis SecurityCouncilresolutionsonterrorism,asevidencedbytheestablishment anomaly. oftheNationalAnti-TerrorismCommittee(hereaftertheCommittee).However, Committeemembersrevealedalackofseriouscommitmentanddirectionby Thecapacityofthepoliceforcetodischargeitsresponsibilitiesisalsolimited. thegovernment.Forexample,noministryisdesignatedafocalpointinthe Moneylaundering,especiallyinitslayeringandintegrationphases,cantake eventofaterroristattack. sophisticatedforms.Tountanglesomeoftheconceivableschemesrequires policeofficerswhoarespeciallytrainedintheinvestigationoffinancialcrime. TheCommitteecomprisesofficialsfrom: Insofarasthepolicedohavethetechnicalcapacitytoprosecutemoney launderingcases,suchcasesmaybereferredtotheAttorneyGeneral’s 1. theMinistryofForeignAffairs,whichchairstheCommittee; Chambers.However,onlyafewmembersofChambershavebeenexposedto 2. theOfficeofthePresident; moneylaundering. 3. theAttorney-General’sChambers; Moneylaunderingisanoffencethatislinkedtoterrorism.Terroristslaunder moneyby,forexample,buyingandsellingpropertiesandusingthefundsderived 4. theDepartmentofCivilAviation; fromsuchsalestofinanceterroristattacks.However,currentlythereareno 5. theBotswanaDefenceForce; legislativeprovisionslinkingmoneylaunderingandterrorism.Itiscommon causethatterroristsmaylaundermoneybyestablishingschools,charitable 6. theBotswanaPolice; organisationsornon-governmentalorganisations(NGOs),churchesaswellas 7. theDepartmentofCustomsandExcise; miningconsortiums.ButthelawinBotswanaissilentonterrorismdespitethe factthatBotswanahasratifiedallterrorism-relatedconversions. 8. theDepartmentofImmigrationandCitizenship;and

Ordinarycitizensdonotseemtothinkthatterroristattackscouldoccurin 9. theBankofBotswana. Botswanaorthatlocalsmightbeusedduringsuchattacks.Theterroristattack BotswanareportedthattheCommittee’smandatewastoenforcefinancial on7August1998inTanzaniabearswitnesstothefactthatterrorismhasno lawsandregulations,immigrationcontrol,aviationsecurity,asylumcontrol respectforborders,religiousaffiliation,ethnicoriginorpoliticalaffiliation.The andotherlawenforcementmeasures.ItwasnotexplainedhowtheCommittee publicinBotswana,however,seemsunawareofthis. workswithlawenforcementorgansandtheCommitteeisnotempoweredby Further,thereseemstobenoexchangeofinformationinBotswanasociety anylaw. relatingtomoneylaunderingandterrorisminthedomesticandinternational Botswanafurthersaidthatithadinstitutedstrictmeasurestoensurethatfunds context.Anecdotalevidencesuggeststhatshammarriagesbypotentialterrorists ownedbyBotswananationalsorfundsintheterritoryofBotswanaarenot maybeanemergingphenomenoninBotswana,buttheimplicationsofsuch usedtosupportterroristactivities.Thiswasdonethroughacircularissuedby marriagesarenotfullyunderstoodbylocals. theBankofBotswanatoallfinancialinstitutions,instructingthemtotakeall InrelationtotheUNSecurityCouncilResolution1373of28September2001, measuresnecessarytoensurethattheydonotprovide“‘safeharbourforterrorist nolegislationhasbeendraftedtoincorporatethemandatorydecisionstaken actionsoractivitiesandtofreezewithoutdelayfundsandotherfinancialassets 36 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Botswana 37 ofpersonswhomaybesuspectedofparticipatinginterroristactivities”’.The 9. anti-moneylaunderingmeasuresmustbeputinplacebyallfinancial governmentfurtherreportedthatnoactivitieshadbeendetectedtosuggest institutions;and thatBotswana’sfinancialinstitutionscouldhavebeenusedtomakefunds, financialassetsorfinancialservicesavailable,directlyorindirectly,forthebenefit 10.bankinginstitutionsmust,asamatterofurgency,haveanti-moneylaundering ofpersonsinvolvedinterroristactivities.This,itwassaid,waslargelydueto trainingprogrammesinlinewiththeBanking(Anti-Money-Laundering) thecountry’sstrictlawsonmoneylaundering. Regulations.

However,theexistingmoneylaunderinglawshaveloopholesthatneedtobe tightenedtoensurethattheyareindeedstrict.Nocountryisimmunetomoney launderingandterrorism.Sayingthatnomoneylaunderingactivitieshasbeen detecteddoesnotnecessarilymeanthatfinancialinstitutionsinBotswanacannot beusedtolaunderdirtymoney.

Recommendationsforlegislativeandinstitutionalmeasures

TomeettherequirementsofResolution1373andthe12UNcounter-terrorism conventions,thefollowinglegislativeandinstitutionalmeasuresshouldbetaken:

1. membersofthepublicshouldbeencouragedtobevigilantandawareof moneylaunderingandterrorism;

2. multi-disciplinarytaskforcesshouldbeestablishedandempoweredto investigatemoneylaunderingandterrorism;

3. capacityoflawenforcementagenciesshouldbedevelopedtoenablethem toinvestigateandenforcemoneylaunderingaswellastheadoptionof counter-terrorismmeasures;

4. Botswana’slongandporousbordersshouldbepatrolled;

5. across-borderexchangeofinformationrelatingtomoneylaunderingand terrorismshouldbeencouraged;

6. moneylaunderingshouldbeclearlydefinedandlinkedtoterrorism;

7. moneylaunderingandcounterterrorismmeasuresshouldbeincorporated intodomesticlaws;

8. moneylaunderingregulationsshouldbemadeapplicabletoallfinancial institutions,notjustbanks.Thiswouldrequireallanti-moneylaundering legislationtobebroughttogetherintoonepieceoflegislationratherthan beingscatteredindifferentpiecesoflegislation. 38 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Kenya 39

CHAPTER3 ApartfromtheattacksintheUS,Kenyahashadtwoseriousterroristattacksof itsown:on9August1998andagaininDecember2002.Theseattackshave THE CONTROL OF MONEY LAUNDERING AND raisedahome-grownconcernoverterrorism,whichisindependentofthe TERRORIST FUNDING IN KENYA concernbroughtaboutbythemorefamousattacksintheUS.Thisstudywill, therefore,reviewexistinginstitutionalandlegislativecontrolsagainstterrorism GeorgeKegoro andgiveacommentontheiradequacy.

PartI:Thecontrolofcorruption

Introduction Kenyaisperceivedasoneofthemostcorruptcountriesintheworld.1Corruption accountsforthelargestamountsofillegallyearnedwealthinthecountry,ahead ThecontrolofmoneylaunderinginKenyarequiresactionattwolevels.Atthe oftheillegaltradeinnarcoticsandotherformsoforganisedcrime.Forexample, firstlevel,measuresarerequiredtodetect,punishandcontroleconomiccrime, itisclaimedthatthesumofKsh600billionheldinforeignaccountsbytenof whichgeneratesthemoneythatthenneedstobelaundered.Anearlierstudy Kenya’spoliticaleliteisalltheproceedsofcorruption.2 identifiedtheprincipalsourcesofproceedsofcrime,whichincludecorruption, drugtraffickingandviolentcrime.Measurestocontroloffencesrelatedtothese Historically,institutionstofightcorruptioninKenyahavebeenweak,enjoying activitieswillhaveadirectandbeneficialimpactonthecontrolofmoney littleofficialsupport.Until2003,whenitwasrepealed,thesolelegalbasisfor launderinginKenya.Thefirstpartofthisstudyis,therefore,devotedtoa fightingcorruptionwasthePreventionofCorruptionAct.Enactedin1956,the reviewofthearrangementsinplaceforthecontrolofcriminalactivitywhose Actmadeitanoffenceforapublicofficialtoacceptabribeorotherinducement motiveisfinancialgain. asconsiderationfortheperformanceofofficialduties.Until1991,however, therewaslittleattempttoenforcetheAct.Then,in1991,theActwasamended Atthesecondlevel,measuresareneededtoaddresstheproblemofmoney toprovidestiffersentencesforcorruption.Again,therewasstillnoattemptto launderingdirectly,asanindependentandlogicalresultofeconomiccrime. enforcetheAct.In1993thegovernmentsetupananti-corruptionunitwithin Anevaluationoftheinstitutionalandlegislativearrangementsnecessaryto thepoliceforceonlyforthistobedisbandedtwoyearslater,followinga achievethedesiredcontrolsisneeded.Thesecondpartofthisstudyattempts mysteriousfirewhichdestroyeditsheadquarters.Thenin1997,thegovernment, toreviewexistinginstitutionalandlegalcontrolsonmoneylaunderingwitha infulfillmentofdonorconditionalities,amendedthePreventionofCorruption viewtosuggestingreformswheredeficienciesaredetected. ActtoestablishtheKenyaAnti-CorruptionAuthority(KACA)asanindependent anti-corruptionauthority.Itsfirstdirectorwasappointedthesameyear,and Thecontrolofmoneylaunderingisthesubjectofincreasedinterestasaresult when,thefollowingyear,theauthoritysoughttoprosecuteanumberofranking oftheeventsintheUnitedStates(US)on11September2001.Itisrecognised publicofficialsfromtheKenyaRevenueAuthorityforthenon-collectionof thatterrorismwouldbecheckedbycontrollingterrorists’financialcapacityto Ksh230millionintaxes,itsdirectorwasdismissedbythePresident. organise.Thisrequiresdetectingthemovementofmoneythatwouldbeused inassemblingtheaccessoriesofterrorism.Moneylaunderingcontrolis, Publicopinionatthetimewasthatattemptstoprosecutethepublicofficials therefore,importantforthepurposeofcontrollingterrorism.Inresponseto hadinterferedwithvestedpoliticalinterests,whichprevailedagainstKACA thethreatofterrorism,theUnitedNations(UN)SecurityCouncilpassed throughthetribunalprocess.3 Resolution1373(hereaftertheResolution)on28September2001,which imposesanumberofobligationsonmemberstateswithregardstocombating WhenKACAsoughttoprosecuteothercorruptioncasesunderanewdirector terrorism.ThisstudywillreviewtheadequacyofKenya’scompliancewiththe theHighCourtintervened,declaringthattheauthority’sstatutorypowerto Resolution. conductprosecutionswasunconstitutional.4 40 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Kenya 41

IntheinterveningperiodtheHighCourtdeliveredanotherdecision,in conductconstitutingcorruptionoreconomiccrimeandtoassistotherlaw December2001,5dischargingacabinetministerfromprosecutionforcorruption enforcementagenciestodoso. 12Secondly,theCommissionhaspowerto onthegroundsthattherehadbeenunduedelayincommencingthe investigatetheextentofliabilitybypublicofficialsforlossordamagetopublic prosecution.Inarrivingatthedecision,theHighCourtinterpretedaprovision propertyandtoinstitutecivilproceedingsfortherecoveryofsuchproperty. oftheConstitutionofKenyarequiringthatcriminalprosecutions,oncestarted, TheCommissionmayinstituterecoveryproceedingsevenifthepropertyis shouldbeconcludedquickly,asalsorequiringthatwheretherehadbeena outsideKenya.13 longinterveningperiodbeforeapersonwascharged,irrespectiveofwhenthe offencewasdiscovered,suchaprosecutionwouldbeunconstitutional. TheCommissionmay,bynotice,requirepersonsreasonablysuspectedof corruptionoreconomiccrimestofurnish,withinareasonabletime,astatement Thetwodecisions,renderedayearapart,areconsideredtobepartofa enumeratingthesuspectedperson’spropertyandwhenandhowitwas tendentiousmisinterpretationoftheConstitutiontobuildabodyof acquired.Itisanoffencepunishablebyafineorimprisonmenttofailtorespond jurisprudencethatishostiletothefightagainstcorruption.TheJudiciaryhas, toanoticeissuedbytheCommissionortoprovidefalseormisleading thus,displayeditsdislikefortheenforcementofanti-corruptionlegislation, informationinadeclaration.TheCommissionmay,inaddition,require someofwhichithasselectivelystruckdownasunconstitutional. associatesofasuspectedpersontoprovidesimilarinformationaboutthe suspectedperson’sproperty.14TheCommissionisempoweredtorequirethe productionofrecordsheldbythirdpartiesiftheyrelatetothepropertyofa Thenewanti-corruptionarrangements suspectedpersonandtotakeandkeepcopiesofsuchrecords.Records,for clarity,includebankaccountsandotheraccounts.TheCommissionmayalso Followingdeclarationsbythejudiciarythatexistinganti-corruptionlegislation requireapersoninwhosepossessionispropertythatisthesubjectofits wasunconstitutional,theNationalAssembly,afterseveralunsuccessfulattempts, investigation,toproducesuchpropertyforitsinspection.15 finallyenactedtwopiecesoflegislationthatrepresentafreshbasisforthefight againstcorruption.ThesearetheAnti-CorruptionandEconomicCrimesAct, Itisanoffencetoknowinglydealwithpropertyacquiredthroughcorruption. 6 7 2003 andthePublicOfficerEthicsAct,2003. Asthesetwostatutesareof Dealingwithsuchpropertyisdefinedasincludingholding,receiving, significantrelevancetothecontrolofmoneylaundering,theirprovisionswill concealing,usingorenteringintoanytransactioninrelationtosuchproperty.16 bediscussedatsomelength. Whereapersoncorruptlyderivedaquantifiablebenefitorthepublicmadea lossasaresultofdealingbyanypersonwithpropertyacquiredthrough TheAnti-CorruptionandEconomicCrimesActcameintoforceonlyinMay corruption,theActprovidesthat,inadditiontothefineofKsh100,000or 2003.TheActestablishestheKenyaAnti-CorruptionCommission 8(hereafter imprisonmentforuptotenyears,theoffendershallbeliabletoamandatory theCommission)asanindependentbodyinchargeofthefightagainst fineequivalenttotwicethevalueofthequantifiablebenefitorthelosstothe corruption.TheCommission’sdirectorisappointedbythePresidentonthe public.17 adviceofanadvisorycommitteeandwiththeapprovaloftheNational 9 Assembly. TheCommissionmaycommencecivilproceedingsagainstapublicofficialor aformerpublicofficial,if,afterinvestigation,itfindsthathehasunexplained TheActrequirestheappointmentofspecialmagistrates,conferredwith assetsaboutwhich,afterhehasbeenaffordedreasonableopportunitytoexplain exclusivejurisdictiontotryoffencesunderitsprovisions.10Theyhavethepower theirsource,heisunabletoprovideanadequateexplanation. 18Wheresuch topardonanypersononconditionoftheirmakingafullandtruedisclosureof proceedingsarebrought,thecourtmayorderthepersontopaycompensation thewholecircumstanceswithintheirknowledgerelatingtoanoffenceunder equaltotheunexplainedassetstothegovernment.19Forthepurposeofsuch theAct.11 proceedings,assetsincludethoseheldintrustforthepersonandassetsgiven awaybythepersonasgiftsorloanswithoutcompensation.Forpurposesof TheCommissionisempoweredtocarryoutmanyfunctionsofwhichtwoare evidence,unexplainedassetsmaybetakenascorroborationthataperson ofrelevancetothisdiscussion.Firstly,theCommissionhaspowertoinvestigate corruptlyreceivedabenefit. 42 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Kenya 43

TheCommissionmayapplytocourt,exparte,forthepreservationofproperty Thepoorrecordofthejudiciaryinenforcingthepreviousanti-corruption pendinglitigation.20 legislationhasledtothecreationofspecialmagistrates’courtswithexclusive jurisdictiontotryoffencesundertheAct.Presumablyonlypersonswiththe ThePublicOfficerEthicsActalsocameintoforceinMay2003.TheAct highestintegritywillbeappointedasmagistratesundertheAct.However,the establishesacodeofconductandethicstowhichallseniorpublicofficials rightofappeal,whichwouldhavetobeexercisedintheexistingjudiciary, mustsubscribe.21Thecodeprohibitspublicofficialsfromengaginginimproper providesapotentialthreattotheenforcementofthelegislation. enrichmentandfromacceptinganypersonalbenefitintheperformanceof publicdutyandrequiresofficialstodeclarepersonalinterestsiftheseconflict Ifenforced,theprovisionsintheActconcerningunexplainedassetswill withofficialduty.22 contributetothefightagainstmoneylaundering.Unexplainedlifestyles,which areaproductofeconomiccrime,aredirectlytargetedbytheprovisions.The TheActrequiresthateverypublicofficertowhomitappliesshallannually powertoseizeassetsandtoconfiscateproceedsofeconomiccrimewill,if submitadeclarationoftheincome,assetsandliabilitiesofhimself,hisspouse enforced,alsostrengthenthefightagainstmoneylaunderingbypromotinga anddependentchildrenundertheageof18.23ByAugust2003publicofficials culturethatquestionsthesourcesofallpropertyandwealth.Thestrategiesfor areexpectedtosubmittheinitialdeclarationsundertheAct. enforcingtheanti-corruptionlegislation,includingthefreezingofassetsand thepowertocompelthird-partydisclosuresandconfiscation,areallpartof Declarationsreceivedfrompublicofficialsaretobeheldinconfidenceand typicalanti-moneylaunderingprocedures.Theintroductionofthesemeasures shouldnotbedisclosedtothepublic.Informationcontainedintheregisterof intolegislationwill,therefore,addtotheexistingbodyoflegislativemeasures declarationsmayonlybedisclosedtolawenforcementagentsorforpurposes thatempowerpublicauthoritiestoquestionsourcesofwealthandtoconfiscate ofjudicialproceedings.24 wealthwhoseacquisitionwastheresultofcrime.Anti-moneylaundering measureswilleasilyfitinto,andwillbereinforcedby,theexistinglawswhich Acompetentauthoritymayinvestigate,whetheronitsowninitiativeoraftera targettheproceedsofcorruption. complaint,ifapublicofficialhascontravenedthecodeofconductandethics. Afterinvestigationtheauthoritymaytakedisciplinaryactionorreferthematter ThePublicOfficerEthicsActprovisionsrequiringthedeclarationofassetsand toanotherauthorityforitsaction.25 liabilitieswillprovidelawenforcementwithinvaluablefinancialintelligence, whichisofcrucialimportantfromthepointofviewofmoney-launderingcontrol. Acommentontheanti-corruptionlegislation Further,ifproperlyenforcedtheprovisionswillactasadeterrentagainst economiccrimesinceaframeworknowexiststhatquestionsthesourcesof Theattacksbythejudiciaryagainsttheprosecutionpowersthatwerevestedin wealth. theoriginalKACAhaveconvincedtheauthoritiestosegregatethispower,leaving TheimportanceoftheprovisionsintheActsinthefightagainstmoney thenewCommissiononlywiththeroleofinvestigatingcorruptioncasesand launderingmust,however,notbeoverstated.Ultimately,ashistoryhasshown, initiatingcivilrecoveries.Prosecutionwillnowbeconductedbytheofficeof goodlegislationiseasilydefeatedbypoliticalindifferenceandevenhostility. theAttorney-General,whichalsoprosecutesalltheothercrimes.Theargument Moreover,anumberofweaknessesexistinthislatestlegislation,includingthe behindconferringtheKACAwithprosecutionauthoritywasthattheofficeof following: theAttorney-Generalhadexerciseditspowertoprosecuteoffencesof corruptioninanunaccountablemanner,leavingdeservingcasesnotprosecuted. • ThePublicOfficerEthicsActrequirementsthatexcludethepublicfrom Forbetterorworse,therefore,investigationandprosecutionhavebeen accesstoinformationcontainedintheregisterofdeclarationsseverely segregated,theformerbeingconferredontheCommissionandthelatteron underminethepurposesofthelegislation.Withoutpublicinvolvementitis theAttorney-General.Asacheckonhisexerciseofthispower,theAttorney- unlikelythatthelegislationwillbeenforcedwiththerequisiterobustness. GeneralisrequiredtomakeannualreportstotheNationalAssemblyexplaining hisdecisionsonthecasesreferredtohimforprosecution.26 • Thereshouldhavebeenarequirementthatallfamilymembersofapublic official,notjustdependents,shoulddeclaretheirassetsandliabilities. 44 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Kenya 45

• Declarationsaretobemadeonaprescribedform,whichisnotstructured Anylandonwhichaprohibitedplantiscultivatedistobeforfeitedtothe toextractthegreatestpossibleamountofinformationfrompublicofficials. state,30asaremachinery,equipment,implements,pipes,utensilsorotherarticles andconveyances(aircraft,vehiclesandvessels)usedforthecommissionof • TherearenoprovisionsundertheActtoobligatetheauthoritiesresponsible anyoffenceundertheAct.31 forreceivingthedeclarationstomakeadequateadministrativearrangements forprocessingtheinformationdeclared.Itislikely,therefore,that TheAttorney-GeneralisempoweredtoapplytotheHighCourtforanorder enforcementofthelegislationwillbehamperedbyadministrative restrainingthepropertyofanypersonwhohascommittedanoffenceunder inadequacies. theAct.ThetransferofanypropertyaftertheAttorney-General’sapplication isvoid.TheCourtmaydirecttherespondenttosubmit,withinareasonable • Thereisnorequirementorprovisionforthetrainingofpublicofficialswho time,astatementofhisassetsandliabilitiesandfailuretodosoisitselfan willberesponsiblefortheenforcementofthelegislation. offence.TheCourtisempoweredtomakeanyinterimordersthatwouldsecure theendsofjustice.Theforfeitureofpropertyis,however,subjecttotheclaims However,unlikeinthepastthenewKenyangovernment,whichcameinto 32 poweratthebeginningof2003,hasmadestrongstatementsagainstcorruption andinterestsofinnocentthirdpartiesagainstsuchproperty. andhaspromisedthatthefightagainstitwillbeatoppriority.Politicalsupport TheActempowersthegovernmenttoenterintoanyarrangementwiththe inthefightagainstcorruption,whichhaspreviouslybeendoubtful,isnow governmentofanyothercountryfortherecoveryandhandingoverof promisedinabundance. possessionstothegovernmentofKenyaofanypropertyinrespectofwhichan orderofforfeiturehasbeenmadeandwhichisinthatcountry,andfortracing Thecontrolofnarcoticsandpsychotropicsubstances andpreservinganypropertyinthatcountryownedorunderthecontrolofany personwhohas,orissuspectedtohave,committedanoffenceunderthe Kenyaisanimportantcountryinthetraffickingofnarcoticdrugsand Act.33 psychotropicsubstances.Itsgeographicallocationmakesthecountryan importantmid-waypointbetweenAsia,thesourceofalargeamountofnarcotic ThegovernmentofKenyamaysimilarlyenterintoanyarrangements,ona drugs,andEuropeandNorthAmerica,whicharethemainmarkets.Kenyais, reciprocalbasis,withthegovernmentofanyothercountryinrespectofrecovery therefore,animportanttrans-shipmentpointwherenarcoticsarerepackaged andhandingoverofpossessiontothegovernmentofthatcountryofany foronwardtraffickingtoEuropeandNorthAmerica. propertyinKenyawhichisconfiscatedbyorforfeitedtothegovernmentof thatcountryinconsequenceofanycommissionofanoffenceagainsta EstimatesindicatethatthetradeinnarcoticsrepresentsmillionsofUSdollars correspondinglawofthatcountry.34 everyyear.27Studieshavecontinuallylinkedtradeinnarcoticswithelements intheKenyanstate,makingthisanimportantpoliticalproblem. TheActthenmakesprovisionsagainstthelaunderingoftheproceedsofdrug trafficking.35Itisanoffenceforanypersontoconcealordisguiseanyproperty ArrangementsforthecontrolofdrugtraffickingarebasedontheNarcotic which,inwholeorinpart,directlyorindirectly,representshisproceedsfrom DrugsandPsychotropicSubstancesAct,enactedin1994.28TheActprohibits drugtrafficking.Itisalsoanoffenceifanypersonconvertsortransfersany thepossessionofandtraffickinginnarcoticdrugsandpsychotropicsubstances propertyorrevenuefromKenyawhichistheproceedsofdrugtraffickingfor andthecultivationofcertainplants.Itprovidesstiffsentencesforoffencesin purposesofavoidingprosecution.Furtheroffencesrelatetotheacquisitionof relationtotheseprohibitions.29Forexample,apersonwhoisfoundinpossession suchpropertyfornoorinadequateconsideration. ofanynarcoticdrugorpsychotropicsubstanceisliabletoimprisonmentfor20 yearsifthedrugorsubstanceisforhisownuseand,ineveryothercase,an Theseoffencesaretobepunishedbyimprisonmentforupto14years,and additionalfineofnotlessthanKsh1millionorthreetimesthevalueofthe suchpunishmentisinadditionto,anddoesnotderogatefrom,anyother prohibitedsubstance,whicheverisgreater. punishmentforrelatedoffencesalreadyprovidedintheAct. 46 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Kenya 47

AcommentontheAct 4. enforcingdrugcontrol,precursorsanddrug-relatedmoneylaunderinglaws, withoutprejudicetotheoperationalroleoftheCentralDrugEnforcement TheNarcoticDrugsandPsychotropicSubstancesActmetwithinstantresistance andAnti-MoneyLaunderingServices; uponimplementationin1994.Theprincipalcriticismwasthatitwasenacted 5. monitoringdrugabuseandpublicinformationfortheyouth,forfamilies, withoutanyformofpublicconsultation,whichservedtoalienatethepublic educatorsandthegeneralpublic,andbysupportingotherinitiativesinthe onceimplementationstarted.ThejudiciaryinitiallyinterpretedtheActas filesofinformationandprevention; prescribingminimumsentencesforthepossessionof‘soft’drugs,afairly commonprobleminKenyathatreceiveswidespreadjudicialleniency.The 6. establishingaviabledatacollectionandanalysissystemondrugabuseand courts,therefore,interpretedthelegislationastakingawaytheirdiscretionon drugtraffickingatthenationallevel; sentencingandrequiringthemtodealwithinappropriateharshnesswith 7. ensuringthedevelopmentoftreatmentandrehabilitationprogrammesfor 36 offendersconvictedfor‘soft’drugoffences. drugaddicts; AworkshopconvenedtoreviewtheGuidelinesforKenyanDrugControlMaster 8. undertakingresearchondrugaddiction; Planheldin1999summarisedexperiencesinimplementingtheActasfollows: 9. ensuringthetrainingofpersonnelinchargeofmeasuresdealingwithdrug • Largenumbersofsuspectsreleasedonbailwhileawaitingtrial,abscond. abuseanddrugtrafficking,moneylaunderingandprecursors; Asaresult,anamendmentwasincludedintheConstitutiontakingaway 10.promotingandensuringthepromotionofinternationalco-operationin therighttobailfordrug-relatedoffences,asaspecificderogationfromthe combatingdrugabuseanddrugtrafficking;and righttobailwhichisconstitutionallyguaranteed. 11.ensuringco-ordinationandsupportofactivitiesofnon-governmental • Poorinvestigationofcasesleadstoalargenumberofacquittals. organisationsandassociationsparticipatingindrugabusecontrol.38

• Corruption,apervasiveprobleminthejudiciary,isespeciallynoticeablein CommentingontheIDCMtheworkshopremarkedthatitsestablishmenthad relationtodrug-relatedcases,inwhichthestakesaretypicallyhigh. ‘noble’intentions.However,itnotedthatbeingonlyacommitteetheICDM “hasgotnostatutoryexistence,noexecutiveauthority,nobudgetaryallocation • Relativelylowunderstandingofdrug-relatedjurisprudencebythejudiciary andnovisiblepublicpresence”.Itwasthereforerecommendedthatamaster andtheprivatelegalprofessionleadstopoorenforcementoftheAct.37 planondrugcontrolinKenyashouldestablishaworkingsecretariatonashort- termbasisand“putinplacearrangementsforresearchtocompileindicative TooverseetheenforcementoftheAct,thegovernmenthasestablishedthe dataastothedrugabusesituationinKenya”onamedium-termbasis.Itwas InterministerialDrugCo-ordinatingCommittee(IDCM),aninformalcommittee alsorecommendedthatinthelongterm,“drugcontrolinKenyashouldhavea bringingtogetherlawenforcementpersonnelfromvariousgovernment visibleandcommittedpoliticalleadership”.39 departments.TheIDCMisresponsiblefor:

1. thedevelopmentandimplementationofanationalplanofactionfordrug Notwithstandingtheproblemsnotedabove,theNarcoticsActhasbeen control; enforcedrelativelysuccessfullyagainstoffenderswhopossessorusethedrugs prohibitedundertheAct.Enforcementinrelationtotheconfiscationofthe 2. implementationofprovisionsoftheSingleConventiononNarcoticDrugs, proceedsorinstrumentalitiesofdrugtraffickinghas,however,beenlargely 1961,theConventiononPsychotropicSubstances,1971andUnitedNations absent.DuringthenearlytenyearsinwhichtheActhasbeeninforce,nota ConventionAgainstIllicitTrafficinNarcoticDrugsandPsychotropic singlecaseforconfiscationoftheproceedsofdrugshasbeenpresented.Even Substances,1988; wherechargeshavebeenbroughtforgrowingaprohibitedplant,thesehave notbeenaccompaniedbyanapplicationfortheforfeitureofthelandonwhich 3. updatingandimplementingdrugcontrollawsandregulations; suchaplantwasgrown,asprovidedforintheAct.Onlyonecasehasever beenpresentedinanattempttoenforcetheanti-moneylaunderingprovisions 48 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Kenya 49 oftheAct.TheCrucialPropertiesCase,asitwascalled,isdiscussedlaterin TheRegulationonMoneyLaundering thischapter. TheRegulationappliestobanks,financialinstitutionsandmortgagecompanies licensedundertheBankingAct.42 PartII:Thecontrolofmoneylaundering ItistheintentionoftheRegulationtoprovideguidanceregardingtheprevention, Anti-moneylaunderinglegislationinKenyahasdevelopedonapiecemeal detectionandcontrolofmoneylaunderingactivities.Itclarifiesthatitisthe basis.Before1994therewasnolegislationagainstmoneylaundering.During responsibilityoftheboardofdirectorsandmanagementofaninstitutionto thatyeartheNarcoticDrugsandPsychotropicSubstancesActwasenacted, establishappropriatepoliciesandproceduresandtotrainstafftoensure whichmadeitanoffencetolaundertheproceedsofdrugs.Itthuscovered adequateidentificationofcustomersandtheirsourcesoffunds.Suchpolicies, onlytheproceedsofdrugtrafficking,excludingmoneyearnedfromother itsays,shouldensuretheeffectiveprevention,detectionandcontrolofmoney criminalactivities.TheAnti-CorruptionandEconomicCrimesActwasonly launderingactivities.43 enactedin2003,extendinganti-moneylaunderinglegislationtotheproceeds ofcorruptionandeconomiccrime. TheRegulationrequiresboardsofdirectorstoensurethatmanagementobtains properidentificationofcustomerswishingtoopenaccountsortomake Itneedstobestatedthatthesestatutesmerelycreateoffencesinrelationto transactions,whetherdirectlyorthroughproxy,toobtainandmaintainadequate thelaunderingofproceedsofthecriminalactivitiesthattheysetouttocontrol, recordsregardingthesourcesoffundsanddetailsoftransactionsinorderto thatiscorruption,economiccrimesanddrugtrafficking.Thestatutesneither establishidentificationofunusualorsuspicioustransactionsandtoreconstruct intendnorattempttosetupinstitutionstodetectandpunishmoneylaundering, individualtransactions,andtosubmittotheCBKareportofanysuspicious whichmayoccurnotwithstandingtheirprovisions.Whatthereforeremainto transactionsoractivitieswhichmayindicatemoneylaunderingorotherattempts beexploredarethearrangements,ifany,thathavebeenputinplacetodetect toconcealthetrueidentityofcustomersorownershipofassets.44 anddetermoneylaundering.Thesewillbeconsiderednext. TheRegulationthenprescribestheminimuminformationacceptablefor determiningthetrueidentityofcustomerswishingtoopenaccountsormake Thefinancialsector transactions.Inthecaseofpersonalaccountsidentificationshouldinclude nationalityanddateofbirthasevidencedbyphotographicidentification,a TheCentralBankofKenya nationalpassportornationalidentitydocument,theaddressofcurrentresidence verifiedbyareferee,verifiedemploymentorsourcesofincome,written Theexistinganti-moneylaunderingarrangementsexistaspartoftheregulatory confirmationfromthecustomer’spreviousbank,ifapplicableand,wherethere frameworkinthefinancialsector.TheCentralBankofKenya(CBK),whichis istobemorethanoneaccountholder,astatementfromeachthathehas keyintheregulatoryarrangements,isnotsurprisinglygivenacentralrolein personallyknowntheotherforatleast12months.45 detectingandreportingmoneylaundering.TheCBKisrequiredbytheCentral BankofKenyaActtoformulateandimplementmonetarypolicyaimedat Toopencorporateaccounts,certifiedcopiesofregistrationcertificatesare achievingandmaintainingstabilityinthegenerallevelsofprices.TheCBKis requiredaswellascertifiedcopiesofboardresolutionstoopentheaccount empowered,amongotherthings,toformulateandimplementforeignexchange andanidentificationoftheprincipalpersonsinchargeofthecorporation, policy,toholdandmanageforeignexchangeandtoactasbankerandadvisor togetherwithauditedfinancialstatementsforatleastthepreviousyear.46 to,andasfiscalagentof,thegovernmentofKenya.40 TheRegulationthendescribessuspiciousactivitiesandtransactionsbygiving TheActempowerstheCBKtoissuedirectionsforthemaintenanceofastableand examplesofsuchtransactionsandrequiresaninstitutionwhichbecomesaware efficientbankingandfinancialsystem.Inexerciseofthesepowers,theCBKhas ofasuspiciousactivityortransactiontoreportittotheCBKimmediately.The madetheRegulationonMoneyLaundering,whichisthemostdeliberateattempt reportinginstitutionisrequiredtomaintainconfidentialityinrespectofthe 41 underKenyanlawtoaddressthemoney-launderingproblematpresent. suspicioustransactionandtoreportsuchatransactiononlytotheCBK.47 50 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Kenya 51

Suspiciousactivityortransactionreportsaretobemadeonaformprovided theidentificationofcustomersandthesourcesoftheirfunds.TheRegulation bytheRegulation.Theformrequirestheidentificationoftheinstitution doesnotprescribeordescribethosepoliciesand,therefore,leavesitto providingthereport,personaldetailsabouttheperson(orentity)againstwhom individualinstitutionstodetermine,surelyinasubjectivemanner,whatis thereportismadeandastatementoftherelationshipbetweentheinstitution suitableforthem. andtheperson(orentity).Thestatementshouldstatewhethertherelationship isthatofaccountant,agent,appraiser,attorney,borrower,broker,depositor,etc. TherearenosanctionsintheRegulationforfailuretocomplywiththe requirementsoftheRegulation.Inthecircumstances,itiswhollyunclearhow Thenthesuspiciousactivityortransactionmustbeidentified,includingdates, breachesaretobepunishedorcorrected.Further,theRegulationdoesnot amountsofmoneyinvolvedandthebasisofthesuspicion,e.g.,largecash reservetotheCBK,asitshouldhavereasonablydone,therighttoinspectthe depositsorlargedepositfromabroad. institutionstowhichtheRegulationappliesforpurposesofascertainingthe levelofcompliancewiththeRegulation. Astatementisrequiredidentifyingthewitnessestothesuspicioustransaction andthepersonwhopreparedthereport.48 TheRegulationdoesnotcontemplate,andthereforefailstomakeprovision for,thepossibilitythatmoneythatisalreadyinthefinancialsystemcouldhave CommentontheRegulation questionablesourcesandmay,therefore,needtobesubjectedtothedue diligencethattheRegulationprescribesformoneythathasnotenteredthe TheCBKRegulationisasimplisticattempttomakeprovisionforthecontrolof system.Forexample,theRegulationdoesnotrequireinstitutionstoensure moneylaunderingthroughthefinancialsystem.Itsfeebleattemptscannotsurely thatotherinstitutionswhosemoneytheymayhandlehavecarriedoutsimilar beexpectedtohaveanysuccess. anti-moneylaunderingchecksonmoneythattheregulatedinstitutionsmay receive. ThefirstglaringproblemisthattheRegulationonlyappliestocommercial banks,financialinstitutionsandmortgagecompanies.Allofthesearedefined Itiswhollyunclearandthereisnoprovisionforwhatistohappentosuspicious andlicensedundertheBankingAct.However,thesearenottheonlyinstitutions transactionreportswhichtheCBKmayreceiveunderthisRegulation.The inthefinancialsystem.Buildingsocieties,savingsandcreditsocieties,foreign RegulationimposesnodutiesontheCBKandmakesnoprovisionwhatsoever exchangebureaux,microfinanceinstitutionsandmoneyremittersallplayan regardingitshandlingofanyreportsthatitmayreceivefromtheregulated importantroleinthefinancialsystemandpresentjustifiableconcernfroma institutions. moneylaunderingpointofview.However,theseareleftoutofthescopeof theRegulation. ThisRegulation,whichisonlypartofsubsidiarylegislation,suffersfromalow profileandpoorpublicity.Outsidethefinancialinstitutionstowhichitapplies Theformprescribedformakingsuspicioustransactionsreportsappearsto thereislittleawarenessofitsexistenceandrequirements.Theassumptionon contemplatealargerscopethanthatallowedbytheRegulation.Whereasthe thepartoftheCBK,itseems,hasbeenthatitsworkisdischargedmerelyby Regulationconcentratesontherelationshipbetweenabankeranditscustomer, enactingtheRegulation.TheCBKhasthereforenotfounditnecessarytoengage theformrequiresreportstobemadeofalltypesofsuspicioustransactions, inanynoticeableadvocacytoimproveawarenessof,andthereforecompliance eventhoseinvolvingpersonswhoarenotcustomersofthebank.Forexample, with,theRegulation.ConcernbytheCBKovermoneylaunderinghas,atbest, suspicioustransactionreportsmaybemadeofaccountants,attorneys,agents, beenperfunctory. employees,shareholders,etc.NoneoftheseiscoveredbytheRegulationitself. Itisthereforeunclearhowabankcouldeverbecompetenttomakeareport TheRegulationrequiresbankstoensurethatsufficienttrainingisaccordedto onthemiftheyarenotcustomers. stafftoenablethemtoidentifyandreportonsuspicionstransactions.Theform oftraining,however,isnotidentifiedwithanyprecision.Itisthereforeleftto TheRegulationmerelyrequirestheboardsofdirectorsoftheinstitutionsto eachinstitutiontomakeitsowntrainingarrangementswithoutthebenefitofa whichitappliesto“establishappropriatepoliciesandprocedures”toensure benchmarkofwhatmaybeconsideredadequate.Theassumption,clearly,is 52 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Kenya 53 thattheCBKhasthecompetencetohandlesuspicioustransactionreportswhich itmayreceiveundertheRegulation.This,astheCrucialPropertiesCase wasneverheardastheunitvoluntarilycausedthemagistrate’sorder (reportedbelow)shows,isnotnecessarilyasafeassumption. tobedischargedandthenappliedtotheHighCourtforanorderto restrainthemoneyundertheNarcoticsDrugsandPsychotropic SubstancesAct.TheHighCourtinitiallygrantedthisorder. TheCrucialPropertiesCase49 TheNarcoticsActprovidesthattheHighCourtmaymakesuchan InJanuary2001CharterHouseBankreportedtotheCBK,asrequired ordertofreezemoneyifitissuspectedtobetheproceedsofaspecified bylaw,thereceiptofUS$25millionintotheaccountofacompany offence.Aspecifiedoffenceisdefinedtoincludealltheseriousoffences calledCrucialProperties.Followingthisnotification,thefraud inrelationtodrugstraffickingundertheAct,withaprovisionthatthe investigationunit(hereaftertheunit)ofCBKappliedforamagistrate’s Attorney-Generalmayaddtothelistofspecifiedoffences.Money orderfreezingtheaccountofCrucialPropertiesandforwarrantsof laundering,althoughanoffenceundertheAct,wasnotaspecified searchtoenabletheunittoinvestigatetheaccount.Theunitstatedin offenceatthetimethemoneywasreceivedinKenya.Sincetheunit itsapplicationthatitbelievedthemoneytobeproceedsofatheft. claimedtobeinvestigatingtheoffenceofmoneylaundering,itsought AftertheaccountwasfrozentheheadoftheunitwrotetoCharter arestraintofthemoney,onlytothenrealisethelegaldeficiency.This HouseBankaskingtobefurnishedwithalltheinformationrelatingto itsoughttocurethroughabelatednoticeinthe Gazettedeclaring transactionsthathadtakenplacethroughtheaccount.CharterHouse moneylaunderingaspecifiedoffence,sothatitcouldavailitselfofthe Bank,however,declinedtherequest,claimingithadnolegalobligation powertorestrainthemoneythroughacourtorder. toco-operatewiththeunit.Thebankfurtherassertedthatitwasbound Theproceedingsthatfolloweddegeneratedintoafarce.TheAttorney- bytherequirementtokeepitscustomers’affairsconfidential. General’sbelatednoticemakingmoneylaunderingaspecifiedoffence Theunitcontinuedwithitsinvestigation,notwithstandingthissetback. wasdeclaredanullitybytheHighCourtonthegroundsthatit TheinvestigationestablishedthatCrucialPropertieshadbeen amountedtoaretrospectiveapplicationofcriminallaw.Theunit,it incorporatedinKenyainMay1998withtwodirectors.InDecember turnedout,hadassumedthatJersey,theclaimedsourceofthemoney, 2000thecompanyopenedaforeigncurrencyaccountatCharterHouse wasthesameasNewJerseyintheUS,andthereforedirectedits BankandthenpassedaresolutiontointroduceHumphreyKariukias investigationtotheUS. anadditionaldirector.Kariukiwastobethestarplayerinthecourt TheHighCourtgrewimpatientoverthefailurebytheunitto casesthatfollowedthereportofmoney’sreceiptbyCharterHouse substantiateitsclaimthatthemoneyhadcomefromLiechtenstein Bank.SoonafterKariukibecameadirector,themoneywasremitted andthefurtherclaimthatitwastheproceedsofdrugtrafficking.The intotheaccount. judge,ratherspectacularly,declaredthatmoneylaunderingwas,after Questionedaboutthesourceofthemoney,Kariukiclaimedthatit all,notanoffenceinKenyaduetothepreviousfailuretodeclareita wastransferredfromJersey“forpropertydevelopmentandtrading specifiedoffence.Heconcludedthat,inanycase,hehad“noreasonto withinAfrica”. believethatthesehighlyreputedinternationalbankscanengageinmoney laundering”,andorderedthemoneytobereleasedtoCrucialProperties. Theunit,however,assertedthatthesourceofthemoneywasnot Jersey,asclaimed,butLiechtenstein,inEurope.Theunitalsoasserted Withthemoneygone,theunithadnostrongincentivetogoonwith thatKariukihadfailedtoprovideaproperexplanationastothesource thecaseandcloseditsinvestigation. ofthemoneywhich,theunitnowsaid,wastheproceedsofdrug trafficking. Otherfinancialserviceproviders CrucialPropertiesthenmadeanapplicationintheHighCourtforthe liftingofthemagistrate’sorderfreezingitsaccount.Thatapplication ThefollowingfinancialserviceprovidersarenotcoveredbytheRegulationbut raiseconcernandmeritconsiderationformoneylaunderingcontrol. 54 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Kenya 55

Foreignexchangebureaux business,althoughtheyhavenowlosttheircompetitiveadvantage.However, theytrytomakeupforthisbyopeningforlongerhours. CommercialbanksofferservicesasforeignexchangebureauxinKenya.These servicesareregulatedforpurposesofmoneylaunderingsincetheCBK Clearly,thesedealersalsoposerisksfromamoneylaunderingpointofview. Regulationappliestoalltheservicesofferedbycommercialbanks.Commercial Thevolumeswithwhichtheydealareimpossibletoascertain,giventhe banksare,however,nottheonlyprovidersofservicesasforeignexchange informalityoftheirbusiness.Strictlyspeaking,thesedealersoperateillegally dealers.Since1995therehasbeenapolicyoflicensingindependentforeign sincealicencefromtheCBKisrequiredtohandleforeignexchange.55 exchangedealers.Thelicensingand,presumably,thecontrolofthese independentbureauxistheresponsibilityoftheCBK.AccordingtotheCBK, Itisdifficulttoimaginethatauthoritiesarenotawareoftheirexistence,since thelicensingofforexbureauxwasmeanttomaketheforeignexchangemarket theycarryouttheirbusinessrelativelyopenly.Itwouldbeeasytocurbthis morecompetitive.50 undergroundsourceofforeignexchange,iftheauthoritieswereinterestedin sodoing. Toregulatethenon-bankforexbureaux,theCBKhasissuedtheForexBureau Guidelines(theGuidelines)withwhichallsuchbureauxmustcomply.The guidelinesprohibitanypersonfromengaginginbusinessasaforeignexchange AcommentontheGuidelines bureauwithoutalicence.TheyrequirebureauxtodepositUS$5,000withthe TheGuidelinesspecificallyrequiredealerstoonlyengageinspottransactions. CBKassecurityforcompliancewiththeGuidelinesandtoopenandmaintain, Thereisnorequirementtokeeprecordsotherthansuchaswillenablethe withacommercialbank,anaccountoraccounts,designated‘ForexBureau conductofaproperauditoftheaccountsofadealer.Suchauditsasmaybe ForeignCurrencyAccount’.Abureauisrequiredtoimmediatelypayintoits conductedbytheCBKarefromtheperspectiveofmonitoringthemovement accountallforeignexchangeremittancesitreceives.51 offoreignexchange,ratherthanforcontrollingmoneylaundering.

TheGuidelinesrequirebureauxtoengageonlyin“spottransactions”and”“not AlthoughtheGuidelinesmentiontheneedtoensurethatsuchrecordsleavea intransactionsinvolvingforwardcover”.Bureauxmaybuyandsellforeign papertrail,thereisnospecificrequirementtoidentifythepersonswithwhom exchange.Theymayalsobuytravellers’cheques,personalchequesandbank bureauxmaydeal.Itisthusimpossible,underexistingarrangements,fordealers draftsbutmaynotengageinthesaleoftheseinstrumentswithoutspecific tobeinapositiontoknowtheircustomersintheeventofaneedtodoso. approval.52 Dealersarerequiredtoopenandmaintainbankaccountswithcommercial TheroleofforexbureauxinKenyaaschannelsthroughwhichmoneyis banks.Thisenablesbankstoreceivemoneyfrompersonswhomneitherthey launderedhasbeennoted.OnereportclaimedthatPakistani-runbureauxin northedealerscanidentify.Thepossibilitiesofmischiefarenumerous. Nairobiarelinkedtothelaunderingofmoneythroughthehundisystem.53In AccordingtoabankmanagerinNairobi,somecommercialbankshavebeen 1999acouplewasarrestedattheJomoKenyattaInternationalAirportwhile expressingconcernoverthebanking,bytheirbureauxcustomers,oflarge attemptingtosmuggleKsh50millioninforeigncurrencyoutofthecountry. sumsofmoneywhosesourcescannotbeexplained.Suchbankshave,asresult, ThecouplehadbeenillegallyrunningaforeignexchangebusinessinNairobi.54 beenreluctanttokeepbureauxascustomers.Clearly,astrongcaseexistsfor Theconnectionbetweenforeignexchangedealersandmoneylaunderingis bringingalternativeforeignexchangedealersintosomeformofcontrolagainst madeclearbythiscase. moneylaundering.

Otherthantheformalforeignexchangedealers,anumberofunderground Moneyremitters foreignexchangeoutletsexistinthebigcitiesespeciallyNairobi,Mombasa andKisumu.Thesearoseduringthetimewhenexchangecontrolsexistedin InformalmoneyremittersofseveralvarietiesoperateinKenya.Theincreasing Kenyaandtheymanagedtoundercutformalsourcesofforeignexchange, numberofKenyanslivingabroadisthoughttohaveledtotheincreaseduseof becauseoftheirrelativelylowcosts,includingthroughtaxevasion.Evenafter informalmethodstoremitmoneybacktoKenya.Thereis,however,noevidence theliberalisationofforeignexchange,theyhavestubbornlyremainedin astothevolumesofmoneyremittedinthismanneranditisnecessaryto 56 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Kenya 57 conductfurtherinvestigationbeforeanyformalinterventioncan,ifnecessary, Buildingsocietiesandmicro-financeinstitutions besuggested. Buildingsocietiesareformedinordertoraisefundsbysubscriptionofmembers, fromwhichtomakeadvancestomemberssecuredthroughland.60Co-operative Afterthebanks,thepostalsystemisthepremiermoneytransmitterinKenya.A societiesoperateonthesameprinciple,exceptthatthesecurityforadvances varietyofservicesisofferedforthetransferofmoneylocallyandalsobetween isbasedonthesharesheldbytheborrowerandpersonalguaranteesbyother Kenya,UgandaandTanzania.Postbank,astate-ownedcommercialbank,in shareholders. addition,offerssuchservicesinternationallyasanagentofWesternUnion,a UScorporationinvolvedinmoneytransfers.Initsturn,thePostbankusesthe Buildingsocietiesoperatevirtuallylikecommercialbanksexceptthattheydo servicesofthepostalsystemasasub-agentofWesternUnion.Similar notgototheclearinghouse.However,theyhavearangeoffinancialinstruments relationshipsforthetransferofmoneyexistbetweenothercommercialbanks that,inpracticalterms,makethemasgoodasbanks.Forexample,theycan andmoneyremitters.56 raisemoneybyissuingbondsandtheyopenaccountsfortheircustomersand issuecheques. AccordingtotheUnitedNationsDrugsControlProgramme(UNDCP),“there hasbeenanincreasingresorttopostalmoneyordersforpurposesofmoney Atpresentthereisnoattemptatregulationoftheseinstitutionsforpurposesof laundering”inNairobi.TheUNDCPclaimsthatcriminalorganisationsare moneylaundering61andthescopeoftheCBKRegulationexcludesthem. increasinglyusingpostalorderstotransferhugeincomesgeneratedfromillicit activitiesintoforeigncountries,veryoftenthosethatapplybanksecrecy.57 Micro-financeinstitutionsareinanevenworsepositionfromthepointofview ofregulation.ThesearerelativelynewinKenyaandoperateoutsideanyform Thepostalsystemisalsousedasaconduitforsmugglingcash,whichissentas ofregulation.Intheory,micro-financeinstitutionsaresetuptoprovidecredit parcelsormail.Todealwiththisproblem,therehasbeenincreasedtraining tothelowerendofthemarket,inwhichcommercialbanksarenotinterested. forpostalpersonnelandtheuseofmodernequipmenttodetectcashbeing Inpractice,however,thereispressuretoalsoadvancecredittothehigherend smuggledthroughthepostalsystem.58 ofthemarket,asnoregulationexistsagainstdoingso.Thereisnoformof controlformicro-financeinstitutions,whicharenotsubjecttoregulationby TheCBKregulatesmoneytransmitterswhohandleconvertibleforeignexchange. theCBK. Itscontrolis,therefore,fromaforeignexchangeperspective,consistentwith thestrongstatutoryemphasisascontainedinitsconstitution.Whereno Anti-moneylaunderingcontrolisclearlyneededinrespectoftheseforgotten convertibleforeignexchangeisinvolved,forexamplewithinEastAfrica,there financialinstitutionsaswell. isnoregulatorymechanism.Itfollowsthatthereisimmediateneedtoputin placeanti-moneylaunderingprocedurestogovernmoneyremitters. Secrecy Therealisationthatthepostalsystemcanbeusedforlaunderingmoneyhas Secrecyisanimportantissueintheanti-moneylaunderingdiscourse.Secrecy causedthesigningofamemorandumofunderstandingbetweenthepolice providesashieldthatmoneylaunderingschemescanexploittoavoiddetection. andthepostalauthoritiesinKenyaforthecontrolofthisproblem.Unfortunately, Thestateofbanking,corporateandlawyer/clientsecrecyinKenyaisrelevant itwasnotpossibletohaveaccesstothememorandumforpurposesofthisstudy.59 tothedesignofeffectiveanti-moneylaunderingproceduresandisdiscussed next. Whatisclear,however,isthatalacunaexistsinthisareaintermsofmoney launderingcontrol.Thememorandum,whateveritscontents,isonlyaninternal Corporatesecrecy documentbetweenthetwopublicauthoritiesconcernedandlackstheforce oflawandtheabilityofuniversalapplication.Itonlyservestoemphasisethe Kenyanlawallowsforthecreationofthecorporationasalegalentityinorder needtoputinplacealegislativeframeworktocontrolmoneylaunderingthrough toprovidebusinesspeoplewithanopportunitytoconducttheirbusinesswith moneyremitters. measuredrisks.ThecorporationsthatcanberegisteredunderKenyanlaw 58 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Kenya 59 includecompanies(withorwithoutlimitedliability),trusts,firms(whichare eliminatedsuchproposals.TheAnti-CorruptionandEconomicCrimesAct unincorporatedconcernswhichareallowedtousecorporatenames),and containsnolimitationsonlawyer/clientconfidentiality.TheNarcoticsDrugs societies,etc. andPsychotropicSubstancesActalsoimposesablanketcoverforinformation heldonalawyer/clientbasiswhich,itprovides,isexemptfromlawenforcement ItisafeatureofKenyanlawtorequirethedisclosureofthenamesandaddresses scrutiny. ofallpersonsresponsiblefortheregistrationofacorporation.Itisalsoafeature toprovidefortheestablishmentofpublicregisterswheresuchinformationis ItissuggestedthattheKenyanapproachtolawyer/clientconfidentialityis tobeheldandtoallowpublicaccesstosuchinformation. perhapstoodogmatic.Someformofdisclosureobligationswillhavetobe imposedonlawyersifaneffectiveanti-moneylaunderingsystemistobe Corporatesecrecy,afeatureofmanyofthefinancialhavenswhichareoften established.Theextensionofanti-moneylaunderingprocedurestolegalservice associatedwithmoneylaunderingschemes,isshunnedbyKenyanlawwhich providerswillhavetoanticipatestrongoppositionfromthelegalprofession, requiresthedisclosureofsufficientinformationtoavoidanonymity. whichhasremainedveryconservativeandwhichwould,inalllikelihood,view suchmeasuresasanunacceptableintrusionintotheage-oldprivilegesthatthe Notwithstandingthelaw,itispossibletoerectschemesthatprotecttheidentity professionconsidersitsright. ofthetrueownersofacorporationbyvestingitscontrolinagents,including legalrepresentatives.Suchschemesultimatelyrelyonfearonthepartofthe Banksecrecy agent,whichwouldinalllikelihoodalsopreventlawenforcementfromtaking TheRegulationonmoneylaunderingissuedbytheCBKprescribestheminimum stepstoidentifythetrueowners.62 amountofinformationthatbanksmustobtainfrompersonswhoareallowed toholdaccounts.Theinformationtobedisclosedhasalreadybeendiscussed Thestateofthepublicregistriesthatholdandprocessinformationon above.Ifcompliedwith,theRegulationissufficienttoensuretheproper corporationsregisteredinKenyais,however,amatterofverygreatconcern. identificationofthecustomersofabank. TherelevantpublicrecordsareheldinacentralregistryinNairobi,calledthe CompaniesRegistry.TheCompaniesRegistryispoorlymaintained,makingit However,questionsariseinrelationtotrustaccounts.Severalbusinessesoperate verydifficulttoregisternewcorporationsandtoretrieveinformationonthose trustaccountsandthemoneyheldinsuchaccountsiseasilymaskedfrom thatarealreadyregistered.Therearealsoreportsofincidents,inducedby scrutinyofitstrueownership.Alawyerwhoopensatrustaccountcanprobably corruption,inwhichofficialsconcealinformationthatshouldbeavailableto successfullymaintainaclaimofclient/lawyerconfidentialityiflawenforcement thepublic.Notwithstandingtheformalprovisionsofthelaw,thereisadefacto authoritiesraisequestionsaboutthebeneficiariesoftheaccount.Foreign stateofsecrecycreatedbythechaotichandlingofinformationandpetty exchangebureauxthatarerequiredtomaintainclientaccountswouldprobably corruption.Indesigningeffectiveanti-moneylaunderingprocedures,itwillbe notbeabletosustainsuchaclaim,butwouldinanycasebeunlikelytoknow necessarytogreatlyimprovethehandlingofinformationattheCompanies theircustomerssincetheyarenotobligedtodoso.Thetruenatureofsecrecy Registryandtoeliminatepettycorruption,whichcanleadtoquiteserious atthispoint,therefore,isnotofabankingnaturebutofalawyer/clientnature. lapsesinaccountability.Informationtechnologywouldcertainlyneedtobe Theneedtoreviewthisformofconfidentialityhasalreadybeenindicated. employedintheplaceoftheexistingmanualsystems.63 Whereabankiscompelledbyanti-moneylaunderinglawtogathersufficient Lawyer/clientsecrecy informationtoidentifyitscustomers,suchinformationisnotusefulunlesslaw Kenya,acommonlawjurisdiction,emphasiseslawyer/clientconfidentiality enforcementauthoritiescanhaveaccesstotheinformationifneeded.The andexemptslawyersfromdisclosinginformationheldbythemabouttheir barriers,ifany,thatbankscanmaintainagainstthirdparties(especiallylaw clients.Draftanti-corruptionlegislationpublishedin2001proposedtolimit enforcementauthorities)withalegitimateinterestintheidentityoftheir lawyer/clientconfidentialityasabarriertoinvestigatingcorruptioncases. 64 customers,areofparamountimportanceinachievingaccountability,whichis However,Kenya’spowerfullegalprofessionsuccessfullycampaignedagainst whatestablishingthetrueidentityofbanks’customersissupposedtoachieve. theinclusionofsuchaclause.Subsequentdraftsofanti-corruptionlegislation Ithasbeenarguedthatbanksecrecyultimatelyonlyservestodelaylaw 60 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Kenya 61 enforcementenquiriesintoagivenfinancialtransaction,ratherthantodefeat fundsheldinsuchaccounts.Dueprocess,however,seemsnecessaryifsuch suchenquiriesaltogether.Delay,however,canleadtosignificantharmasit drasticpowersaretobeformalised. canallowtimetomovemoneyoutofabankandthusdefeattheinterestsof lawenforcement.Theinquiryastobanksecrecyshouldthereforeconcern TheInterconServicesCase,whosefactarenarratedbelow,demonstratessome itselfwithwhether,firstly,itispossibletohaveaccesstoinformationheldby ofthedynamicsinvolvedintheenforcementofbankingsecrecyinKenya. banksandsecondly,howeasilythiscanbeachieved.

InKenyathereisnospecificlegislationonbanksecrecy.Inpractice,however, TheInterconServicesCase66 banksmaintainstrictconfidentialityabouttheircustomers’transactions.The OneFridayin1985,JamesNderitureceivedachequeforKsh17million HighCourthasheldthatitisactionableforabanktoreleaseinformationonits fromtheDepartmentofCustomsandExcise.Atthetimethiswasa customerstounauthorisedthirdparties.Lawenforcementcan,however,access verylargesumofmoney.Lateronthesamedaythemanagerofthe informationheldbybanksusingasimpleprocedurecontainedintheCriminal localbranchoftheStandardCharteredBankvisitedNderitu’s 65 ProcedureCode(hereaftertheCode). restaurant,ashehadoftendone,andaftersomediscussionNderitu disclosedhispossessionofthechequewhich,itwasagreed,Nderitu TheCodeempowersamagistratetoissueawrittensearchwarrantwhenitis shoulddepositinthebankthefollowingday. provedthatsomethingthatisconnectedto,ornecessaryfor,aninvestigation intoanoffence,issuspectedtobeinanyplace,building,ship,vehicle,etc. Thishedid.ThechequewasdrawninfavourofInterconServices,a Thewarrantmaybeissuedtoanauthorisedpoliceofficerwho,withsucha companyofwhichNderituwasthemanagingdirectorandthesole warrant,mayentersuchaplaceandconductinvestigationsintoanoffence. signatorytoitsaccountatthebank.Nderituwasalsothemanaging Theofficermayseizeandtakebeforethecourtsanythingfoundintheplace directorandsolesignatorytotheaccountsofthreeothercompanies thatisrelevanttotheoffenceunderinvestigation. thathadaccountswiththebank,ofwhichonewascalledInterstate CommunicationsandasecondwascalledSwiftair. Inpractice,thissimpleprocedureisusedbylawenforcementtogainaccessto ThefollowingMonday,thebankmanagertelephonedNderitutoinform informationheldbybanks.Wherethisisdone,lawenforcementagents himthathissuperiorshadqueriedthechequeandneededtoknow approachmagistratesandneednotcomplywithanyformallegalprocedures thesourceofthemoney.Themanageraskedhimforanydocumentary tobeissuedwithsearchwarrants. evidencehemayhavewhichcouldshowtheunderlyingtransaction. Thusinpracticelawenforcementagentsareabletorestraintransactionsin Nderitutookthepaymentvoucherthathadaccompaniedthecheque givenbankaccountswithoutfurtherproceduralformalitiesonthebasisofonly fromtheDepartmentofCustomsandExcisetothebank.On asearchwarrant.Thisseemsblatantlyillegal,however,andwouldprobably examinationofthevoucher,itturnedoutthattherewereminor notbesustainableagainstsophisticatedcriminalswhohaveaccesstogood discrepanciesbetweentheamountofmoneyinfiguresandinwords. legaladvice.IntheCrucialPropertiesCase,discussedabove,thesesimple Nderituattributedthistoaclericalerror.Italsoturnedoutthatthe procedureswereusedtofreezethemoneybutsubsequenttotherestraintthe companytowhichthechequeshouldhavebeenpaidwasInterstate bankrefusedtoco-operatewithinvestigatorswhosoughtinformationonthe andnotIntercon,althoughbothcompanieswereownedbyNderitu, account.Whenlawyersenteredthescene,theprocedureusedforrestraining whoexplainedthatthechequehadbeenwritteninfavourofthelatter themoneycameunderquestion,forcinglawenforcementtomaketheill- companyathisrequest.Theaccountsforthefourcompanieshadbeen fatedapplicationundertheNarcoticsActforarestraintorder. openedduringthesamemonth.Intercon’saccounthadonlybeen openedeightdayspreviouslyandthisverylargedepositwasitsfirst Atapracticallevelexistingbanksecrecyproceduresaretiltedheavilyinfavour transaction. oflawenforcementagentswhocaneasilyaccessbankrecordswithminimum Evenasthebankmadethesequeries,itreceivedthefundsrepresented delay.Whatseemsnecessaryistomakelegalprovisionfortherestraintofthe 62 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Kenya 63

bythechequefromtheKenyaCommercialBank,thebankersofthe bankwasprevented,atthetrial,fromprovingthatthemoney,which DepartmentofCustomsandExcise. waspaidtoNderituasexportcompensation,waslegallynotpayable, asnoneofhiscompanieswasinvolvedinexportbusiness. TheStandardBankmanagerpaidtheproceedsofthechequeinto Intercon’saccount.Nderituimmediatelytransferredthefundsto Thejudgeheldthat: Swiftair’saccount,exceptforasmallamountwhichhewithdrew.He (i) thebankwasentitledtomakeinquiriesintothepaymentespecially theninstructedthebanktotransferthemoneytoadifferentbank sinceitwasunusuallylarge,hadbeenmadeintoanewaccount whereSwiftairheldanaccount.However,beforethiscouldbedone, and,further,sincetherewerequeriesabouttheproperpayeeof lawenforcementintervened. thecheque(InterconorInterstate); (ii) thefundamentalquestion,however,wastheextenttowhicha Meanwhile,thebankmanagerwasproceedingwithfurtherinquiries bankcouldbeallowedtogotoestablishthetruth.Itisnottherole intothistransaction,whichthebankconsideredmostunusual.He ofabankertoassumetheroleofaninvestigatorofitscustomers’ telephonedtheDepartmentofCustomsandExciseandspoketoone affairsortoturnitselfintoapoliceman; ofthesignatoriestothechequewhoconfirmedthatthepaymentto (iii) thereporttotheCBKwentfartoofaroutofthebank’sremitof Nderituwasvalid.Notsatisfied,themanagercalledthesecondsignatory reasonableinquiriesanddirectlyledtothesufferingwhichNderitu whoalsoconfirmedthetransaction.Stillunsatisfied,hemadeacallto subsequentlyunderwent.Thisreportwasabreachofthe thefraudsectionoftheCBK. confidentialitythatthebankowedNderitu,asacustomer. TheCBKquicklymovedinwiththepolice,whofrozealltheaccounts ofthefourcompanies,arrestedNderituandchargedhimwiththe theftofthemoneythathadbeenpaidtohimbytheDepartment. Thenon-financialsector EventuallyNderituwasconvictedbyamagistratebut,onappeal,the HighCourtsetasidetheconviction. Therudimentaryanti-moneylaunderingproceduresexistinginKenyaonlytarget financialinstitutions.Non-financialinstitutions,ithasbeenrealised,arejustas Subsequently,Nderitusuedthebankin1988forbreachofcustomer importantinmoneylaunderingterms.Forexample,theEuropeanUnion confidentiality,takingtheformofthevariousreportsthebankmanager DirectiveonMoneyLaunderingnowrequiresanti-moneylaundering hadmadetothepublicauthorities,oneofwhichhadtriggeredhis procedurestobeextendedtosuchinstitutionsasantiquedealers,auctioneers, arrestandprosecution. casinosandothergamblingbusinesses,dealersinpropertyandhigh-valueitems Therewasaverygreatdelayinthetrialofthesuit,whichwasonly andcompaniesandtrustproviders. heardin2002.NderituclaimedspecialdamagesofmorethanKsh600 millionwhich,heasserted,representedthelossofbusinessresulting AstudyonmoneylaunderingtypologiesinKenyathatprecededthecurrent fromthedisruptionsassociatedwithhisarrest. study,identifiedcasinosanddealersinpropertyandhighvalueitemsaspossible conduitsthroughwhichmoneylaunderingmaybeoccurringinKenya.Itis, Atthetrial,thepartiesconsentedtoadeterminationofthequestionof therefore,necessarytoexaminewhetheranysafeguardsexistagainsttheuse liabilityandthen,ifnecessary,theassessmentofdamages. oftheseasmoneylaunderingavenues. ItemergedduringthetrialthatNderituhadhadseveralothercriminal casesbroughtagainsthimaround1985butwasacquittedinallof Casinos them.TheDepartmentofCustomsandExcise,thepresumed complainant,wasemphaticduringthetrialthatthepaymenttoNderitu TheregulationofcasinosinKenyaisprovidedforundertheBetting,Lotteries hadbeenregular,althoughitsheadsubsequentlywrotethatanoffence andGamingAct.TheActdoesnotdefineacasinoandonlydefinesgaming hadoccurredwhichtheDepartmentfounditdifficulttoprove.The premisesas“premiseskeptorused(whetherononeoccasionormorethan 64 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Kenya 65 one)forgaming,andtowhichthepublichasormayhaveaccessforplaying Dealersinhigh-valueproperty thereinofagameofchance,whetherthegameofchancebeunlawfulornot”. Asmentioned,astudyonthetypologiesofmoneylaunderinginKenya establishedthatanumberofdealersinhigh-valuepropertyareexposedto Nopersonmaycarryonthebusinessofgamblingwithoutalicence.TheAct moneylaundering.Thepropertiesincluderealestateandmotorvehicles.A establishesaboardtoissuelicencesandtosupervisegamingpremisesand reportonthelaunderingproceedsofdrugs,forexample,claimedthatorganised empowersittomakeregulationstoprotectpersonsplayinginthepremises crimesyndicatesareinvolvedinthepurchaseoflandinMombasaandthe againstfraud. developmentofholidayfacilities,usingtheproceedsofcrimescommittedinEurope. SubsidiarylegislationmadeundertheActrequiresthemaintenanceofrecords Informantsinterviewedfortheearlierstudysaidtheybelievedthatproceeds toshowthetotalamountofmoneythataplayerputsdownasstakesorpays ofdrugsare,atleastinpart,investedinup-marketdevelopmentsandcontribute bywayoflossesorexchangesfortokensusedinplayingthegame. tothecontinuedinvestmentinthissector.Asaresult,propertyonthecoast, especiallyinMalindi,isfairlyexpensivenotwithstandingageneralbusiness Commentoncasinolegislation downturninthesamearea. Existinglegislationoncasinoshasnoconcernwiththepossibilitythatthey couldbeusedasavenuesofmoneylaundering.CasinosinKenyahave Motorvehicledealersaresimilarlyhighlyexposedtomoneylaundering.The traditionallyhadstronglinkswiththepoliticalestablishment,whosepatronage earlierstudyestablishedthattheyareespeciallyvulnerablebecause,firstly, theyhavefounddifficulttoshakeoff.Forexample,agovernmentdirective theirtradeinvolvesanimport/exportelementforwhichcriminalmoneycan wasissuedrequiringallgamblingincasinostobeconductedusingforeign bebroughtintothecountryintheformofmotorvehicles,and,secondly, exchange.ThiswasatatimewhenforeignexchangecontrolexistedinKenya becausemotorvehiclesinthemselvesareitemsofhighvalue.Motorvehicle andaccesstosuchexchangeitselfrequiredpoliticalconnections.Casinoowners purchasesareoftenconductedincash,exposingfinancialinstitutionstothe withoutsuchconnectionswere,naturally,disadvantagedbythispolicywhich, possibilityofsubsequentreceiptoftaintedmoney. itwasthought,wasintroducedinordertogiventhepoliticaleliteachanceto owncasinos. Estateagentsandotherrealestatedealersclearlyneedtobesubjectedtoanti- moneylaunderingcontrol.Thesameappliestootherdealersinhigh-value In2000legislationwasintroducedwhichexemptedcasinosfromtaxation.Itis items,ofwhommotorvehicledealersarethemostimportant. whollyunclearwhysuchlegislationcouldhavebeennecessary.Thelegislation wasonlyrepealedin2003. Companyandtrustproviders Peoplewhoprovideadviceontheestablishmentofbusinesses,including AccordingtotheUSDepartmentofStateInternationalNarcoticsControl companiesandtrusts,arealsoexposedtomoneylaundering.Theexampleof StrategyReportofMarch1996,thecasinoindustryinKenyaissuspectedtobe theKaruraForestsagademonstratesthepoint:KaruraForestisalargenatural anavenuethroughwhichnarcotics-relatedmoneylaunderingoccurs. forestontheoutskirtsofNairobiwhich,astheonlysuchforestinNairobi,isof immenseenvironmentalimportance.In1998,itemergedthatalargeportion OtherreportshavealsolinkedcasinostomoneylaunderingactivitiesinKenya. oftheforesthadbeensecretlyalienatedasprivatepropertyincomplete Forexample,SaidMasoudMohammed,afugitivefromKenyalawenforcement contraventionoftheForestsAct.Followingapublicoutcry,itbecamenecessary authoritiesinconnectionwithdrug-relatedcrimes,wasalsoacasinoownerin toestablishthebeneficiariesofthisalienation. Kenya. AsearchattheLandsOffice,wherelandtransactionsareregistered,revealed Atthemoment,however,therearevirtuallynoanti-moneylaunderingcontrols thattheforesthadbeenallocatedto36limitedcompanies.Asearchofthe againstcasinos,but,bytheevidence,theyareingreatneed. companiesregisterwasnecessarytoestablishwhothedirectorsofthecompanies were.Itemergedthatallthecompanieshadbeenregisteredonthesameday 66 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Kenya 67 byonelawfirm.However,theinformationonthedirectorshipswasunavailable FurtherinitiativeisseenintheSuppressionofTerrorismBill,2003,whichis intheregistrybecausethosebehindthescandalhadarrangedforits discussedbelow. concealment.Askedtoprovideinformationonthecompanies’directors,the lawfirm,naturally,claimedprivilegeanddeclinedtogivethisinformationto theinterestedauthorities. TheSuppressionofTerrorismBill

Legalpractitioners,accountantsandcertifiedpublicsecretariesaretheprimary ThelongtitleoftheBilldeclaresittobe“anActofParliamenttoprovide companyandtrustprovidersinKenya.Legalpractitionersenjoylawyer/client measuresforthedetectionandpreventionofterroristactivities;toamendthe privileges,whichhavealreadybeendiscussedabove.Theothersdonotand Extradition(commonwealthcountries)ActandExtradition(contiguousand would,intheory,becompelledtodiscloseinformationthatcomestothemto ForeignCountries)Act;andforrelatedpurposes”.Terrorismisdefinedinclause publicauthoritiesifitisrelevantforlawenforcement.However,noneare 3oftheBilltomeantheuseorthreatofactionwhere: presentlyobligedtoreportsuspicioustransactionsfromamoney-laundering pointofview.Also,nonearethesubjectofanyspecificanti-moneylaundering (a) theactionusedorthreatened: obligations,forexample,thedutytoknowtheirclients,thedutytomaintain (i) involvesseriousviolenceagainstaperson; recordsoftransactionstoenablereconstructionwherenecessary,etc. (ii) involvesseriousdamagetoproperty; (iii) endangersthelifeofanypersonotherthantheperson Therecanbelittledoubtthattheseserviceprovidersshouldbelegitimate committingtheaction; targetsforanti-moneylaunderingcontrols. (iv) createsaseriousrisktothehealthorsafetyofthepublicor asectionofthepublic;or (v) isdesignedseriouslytointerferewithorseriouslytodisrupt PartIII:Terroristactivities anelectronicsystem. (b) theuseorthreatisdesignedtoinfluencethegovernmentorto TheUnitedNationsSecurityCouncilResolution1373(2001) intimidatethepublicorasectionofthepublic;and (c) theuseorthreatismadeforthepurposeofadvancingapolitical, ThisResolutionisconcernedwithterrorismandterroristacts.Itisalsoconcerned religiousorideologicalcase; withtheconnectionbetweeninternationalterrorismandtransnationalorganised crime,illicitdrugsandmoneylaundering. Providedthattheuseorthreatinvolvestheuseof: (i) firearmsorexplosives; Itcallsforthepreventionandsuppressionofthefinancingofterroristactsand (ii) chemical,biological,radiologicalornuclearweapons;or thecriminalisationofthewillfulprovisionorcollection,byanymeans,directly (iii) weaponsofmassdestructioninanyform,shallbedeemed orindirectly,offundswiththeintentionthatthefundsaretobeusedforthe toconstituteterrorism. fundingofterroristacts.Itcallsforthefreezingoffundsandfinancialassetsof personswhocommitorfacilitatethecommissionofterroristacts. Clauses4–8oftheBilldealwithterroristoffencesandmakeawiderangeof conductillegal,includingprovidingweaponsandtraining,directingterrorist TheResolutionrequiresstatestoco-operatetoensurethatterrorismisprevented organisations,possessingarticlesforterroristpurposesandcollectinginformation atallcoststhroughtheexchangeofnecessaryinformationandpreventingthe forterroristpurposes.Themaximumsentencefortheseoffencesrangesfrom financing,planningorfacilitationofterroristacts. tenyearsincertaincasestolifeimprisonmentinothers.

KenyahastakenstepstoimplementthedecisionsintheResolutionthrough Clause9empowerstheMinistertodeclarethatanorganisationisconcerned domesticlegislation.Moneylaunderinginconnectionwithcorruption, interrorismbynoticepublishedinthe Gazetteandmayrevokeanynotice economiccrimesanddrugtraffickingiscriminalised,asdiscussedabove. previouslypublishedunderthisprovision. 68 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Kenya 69

Anypersonwhoisamemberof,orwhosupportsorinvitesotherstosupport, Thecourtbeforewhichapersonisconvictedofanoffencerelatedtoterrorism adeclaredterroristorganisation,isguiltyofanoffence. mayordertheforfeitureofanypropertyconnectedwithterrorism,orusedfor anoffence. Alsoguiltyofanoffenceisanypersonwhopubliclywearsanyclothingina publicplacecapableofreasonablesuspicionthatsuchapersonisamember AuthorisedofficersarealsoallowedtoapplytotheHighCourt expartefora orsupporterofadeclaredterroristorganisation.Thepolicemayarrestsucha detentionorderwithrespecttothecashseizedunderthesuspicious personwithoutawarrant. circumstances.AuthorisedofficersincludetheCommissionerofCustomsand Excise,theCommissionerofPoliceandtheAttorney-General. TheBillthenattemptsadefinitionofterroristpropertyas“moneyorother propertywhichhasbeenorisintendedorislikelytobeusedforpurposesof TheCommissionerofPoliceisempoweredtoapplytoajudgeoftheHigh terrorism”(includingtheresourcesofadeclaredterroristorganisation).Terrorist Courtfortheissueofawarrantforthepurposeofaterroristinvestigation. propertyalsoincludesproceedsofactsofterrorismandproceedsofactscarried outforthepurposeofterrorism.Severaloffencesarecreatedinrelationto Incaseofurgencythepolicemaylawfullymakeanarrestwithoutawarrant. terroristpropertyincludingfundraisingforterroristpurposes,thereceiptof Customsandimmigrationofficialsareempoweredtomakearrestsinthesame moneyoranyotherpropertyforterroristpurposesandtheuseorpossession wayasthepolice. ofterroristproperty.Anyfinancialarrangementtomakemoneyavailablefor terroristpurposesisanoffence,asistheremoval,transferorconcealmentof Itisanoffenceforanypersontodisclosetoanotherpersonanythinglikelyto terroristproperty. prejudicetheinvestigation,orinterferewithmaterialthatislikelytoberelevant totheinvestigation. Thepoliceareallowedtoreceiveinformationintheknowledgeofanyalleged terroristactivitiesandapersondoesnotcommitanoffenceinrelationtoterrorist Apersonsuspectedofaterroristoffencemaybedetaineduntilinvestigations propertyifhisconducthastheexpressconsentofthepolice. arecompleted,withoutprejudicetotherighttolegalrepresentation.

TheAttorney-Generalmay,onreasonablegroundsofsuspicion,applytothe TheBillproposesseveralmeasuresbywayofmutualassistance,includingthe HighCourtforanordercompellingapersontodeliverupanydocumentor exchangeofinformationattherequestofacompetentforeignauthoritywhere recordrelevanttoidentifying,locatingorquantifyinganypropertybelonging suchdisclosureisnotprohibitedbyanyprovisionoflawandwillnotbe toapersonsuspectedofterrorism;orrequiringabank,anyotherfinancial prejudicialtonationalsecurity. institutionortrusteetoproduceallinformationanddeliverupdocumentsand recordsregardinganybusinesstransactionconductedbyoronbehalfofthe Further,wherearequestismadebyastateforassistanceintheinvestigationor personconcerned. prosecutionofanoffencerelatedtoterrorismorforthetracking,attachment orforfeitureofterroristpropertylocatedinKenya,theAttorney-General,as Anauthorisedofficermayseizeanycashuponreasonablebeliefthatitisbeing theagentofthegovernment,isrequiredtoco-operatewiththerequesting importedintoorexportedfromKenya,orisbeingbroughttoanyplacein state.Similarly,thegovernmentmayalsomakearequesttoanyforeignstateto Kenya,forthepurposeofbeingexportedfromKenyaasterroristproperty. provideinformationorevidencerelevanttoanoffenceundertheAct,orfor Suchseizureisallowednotwithstandingthatonlypartofitissuspectedtobe thetracking,attachmentorforfeitureofterroristpropertylocatedinthatstate. terroristproperty. CommentontheBill TheAttorney-GeneralmayapplytotheHighCourtforaprovisionalorderof attachmentofterroristproperty.Suchanordermayprohibitthirdpartiesfrom TheSuppressionofTerrorismBillwas,atthetimeofthisstudy,thesubjectof makingpropertyavailabletoaterroristorganisation. robustpublicdebateinKenya.ThepublicationoftheBillcoincidedwithan announcementbyagovernmentminister,quotingintelligencesources,that 70 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Kenya 71

Kenyawastargetedforaterroristattack.Kenyahasalreadybeenthesubjectof MachariaGaitho,ajournalistwiththe DailyNation,alocalnewspaper,has twoseriousterroristattacks,eachofwhichledtothelossoflifeandthe termedtheBill“aratheroutrageouspieceofanti-terrorismlegislationthatis destructionofproperty.Theannouncement,therefore,wasreceivedwith notonlyashamelessproductoftheUSAttorney-General,butthemost widespreadpublicbelief. unconstitutionaldocumentandaffronttocivillibertieswehaveeverhadfoisted uponus”.69 Theminister’sannouncementledtoimmediatereactionbythegovernments oftheUSandBritain,eachofwhichissuedadvicetoitscitizenstoavoidnon- HisopinionrepresentsawidelyheldviewinKenyathattheAnti-TerrorismBill essentialtraveltoKenya.Asaresult,airlinesoriginatinginEuropeanddestined isanAmericanpieceoflegislationthatisbeingforcedonKenyairrespectiveof forNairobicancelledflights,triggering,inturn,massivecancellationsonthe Kenya’sownneedsorrealities. partoftouristswho,butfortheadvice,wouldhavevisitedKenya.Kenyarelies heavilyontourismasasourceoflivelihoodandasthemainsourceofforeign Clause18oftheBillcreatesimmunityforpersonswhowouldotherwisebe exchange.Thesecancellationshave,therefore,hadanadverseeconomicimpact guiltyofterrorismiftheywere“actingwiththeexpressconsentofamemberof inthecountry,whichhasledtopublicdisquiet.Inthefaceofallthisthepublic thepoliceforce”.Thisprovisionisviewedasintendedtoprovideroomfor reactionisambivalent:ontheonehand,itisappreciatedthataterroristattack informersandspiestobeplantedinorganisationswithaviewtoexposing mayoccurinKenyaandprecautionsarenecessarytoavoidsuchanattack;on terrorism.Onecommentatorwroteinreferencetothisprovision,that“once theotherhand,thedisruptionsresultingfromthenegativepublicitythecountry thislawispassed,youcannottrustanybody;youcanneverknowiftheyare hasattractedhavebeenthesourceofpublicconcernandanger. workingforBigBrother”.

Kenyahasbeenunderpressuretoenactanti-terrorismlawsasabasisfor Otherconcernsincludetheprovisionswhichmakeitanoffencetowearuniform reassuringtheinternationalcommunitythatalegalframeworktofightterrorism orclothingassociatedwithterrorismorterrorists.TheMuslimcommunityhas isinplaceandthat,therefore,Kenyaneednotbeisolated.Theadviceby viewedthisprovisionwithgraveconcern,fearingthatitwilltargetpeoplewho westerngovernmentstotheircitizensnottovisitKenyais,however,viewedas wearIslamicdress.Thecommunityhastriedtomakeitclearthatitisterrorists anattempttoisolateacountrywhosecloserelationswiththeWesthavealready whowearIslamicdressandnotMuslimswhowearterroristdress.Theprovision extractedaheavypriceintermsofterrorism. isthereforeviewedashighlyprejudicialandanunacceptableformofpatronage bytheWest,whichseekstoprescribehowpeoplemaydress. PublicauthoritiesinKenyahaveattemptedtodemonstrateseriousnessinthe fightagainstterrorismbymakingarrestsofthoseallegedlyresponsibleforthe TheAttorney-General,whopublishedtheBill,hasbeenthesubjectofcriticism latestterroristattacksinKenya.However,controversyalwaysaccompanies in,amongothers,thefollowingwords: suchefforts,withthecountry’ssizeableMuslimpopulationclaimingthatitis beingtargetedforharassmentandunfoundedofficialreprisalsundertheguise BydraftingthisBillandpresentingittoParliamentfordebate,hehas offightingterrorism.Itisthispoliticalbackgroundagainstwhichpublicresponse causedtaxpayers’moneytobewastedonafutileexercise,wellaware totheproposalsinthisBillmustbeunderstood. thatwhatheisaskingParliamenttodebateisunconstitutionalanda violationofKenya’sintegrityandsovereignty.Hehasrenderedhimself Notunexpectedly,thepublichasmostlybeenhostiletotheBill’sproposals.Its unfitandincompetenttocontinueholdingtheofficeoftheAttorney definitionofterrorismhasbeenoneoftheimportantpointsofcriticism. General,andassuchshouldresign.70 AccordingtoDickMaragia,aKenyanlawyerresidentintheUS,“thereislittle doubtthatthecurrentBillisnotclearonwhatconstitutesterrorismandhow TheperceptioninKenyaisthereforethatthecountryneedsanti-terrorism thiscanbedistinguishedfromordinaryoffencesunderthePenalCodeorother legislation,butnotintheforminwhichithasbeenproposedthroughtheBill. statutes”.67TomOjienda,aNairobilawyer,haswrittenthatthedefinitionof GiventhemassiverancourwhichtheBillhasaroused,itishighlyunlikelythat terrorismintheBill“isvagueandopentoseveralinterpretationswiththe itwillbeenactedinitspresentform.ItisevenpossiblethattheBillmaybe possibilityofunlawfulincarcerationandsacrificeoffundamentalhumanright”.68 withdrawnandre-draftedtotakeintoaccounttheconcernsraised. 72 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Kenya 73

Notes 23 Section26(1). 1 TheCorruptionPerceptionIndex(CPI)ispublishedannuallybyTransparency 24 Section30. International,theleadingglobalanti-corruptionorganisation.In1996itranked 25 Section35. Kenyaasthethirdmostcorruptcountryintheworld.Sincethenithasbeen rankedasoneofthemostcorruptcountries,yearafteryear. 26 TheAnti-CorruptionandEconomicCrimesAct,Section37. 2 Forexample,aCabinetMinistermadeclaimsofrecoveriesofmoneypreviously 27 See,forexample,AOdera,Kenyaturnedintoahavenfordrugbarons, heldabroadasproceedsofcorruption.Seealso‘Sh15brecoveredinwaron ExpressionToday,11February1999,p1. graft’,saysKiraitu,DailyNation,3March2003. 28 Act4of1994. 3 See,forexample,OtsienoNamwaya,Thebigissue,EastAfricaStandard,8 29 Forexample,thepenaltyforpossessionofprohibitedsubstancesforownuseis December2003,p3.Itisclaimedthatinrespectoftheremovalofthe imprisonmentupto20years(section3(2)(b))andineveryothercaseitisafine DirectorofKACA,JohnHarun,“Mwau’sfatewasseentohavebeen ofnotlessthanKsh1millionorthreetimesthevalueoftheprohibited orchestratedbypowerfulpoliticalforcesthatloathedhisself-conceitedcrusade substance,whicheveristhegreater,orimprisonmentforlife,orbothsuchfine againstcorruptionthatappearedtothreatentheirinterests”. andimprisonment. 4 InStephenMwaiGachiengov. Republic(unreported),HighCourt 30 Section7. MiscellaneousApplicationNo.302of2000. 31 Section20(1). 5 InRepublicv.AttorneyGeneralexparteKipng’enoarapNgeny(unreported). 32 ProvisotoSection20(2). 6 Act3of2003. 33 Section59(1). 7 Act4of2004. 34 Section59(2). 8 Anti-CorruptionandEconomicCrimesAct,section6(1). 35 Section49. 9 Section8. 36 Thecourtsroutinelyhandeddownsentencesofnotlessthantenyearsforall 10 Section3. convictionsundertheAct,thisbeingtheminimumsentencethatthey 11 Section5(1). consideredthemselvesboundtogive.Previously,suchoffenceswouldtypically attractonlylightpenalties. 12 Section7(1)(a)(b)and(c). 37 Unpublishedreportontheworkshoponlegalandinstitutionalarrangementsin 13 Section7(1)(h). guidelinesfortheKenyaDrugControlMasterPlan,heldattheKenyaCollege 14 Section27. ofCommunicationandTechnology,Mbagathi,Nairobi,on12May1999. 15 Section28(8). 38 Ibid. 16 Section47. 39 Ibid. 17 Section48. 40 CentralBankofKenyaAct,section4. 18 Section55(2). 41 RegulationNo.CBK/PG.12. 19 Section55(6). 42 Chapter488oftheLawsofKenya. 20 Section56. 43 RegulationonMoneyLaundering,PartII,paragraph1. 21 ThePublicOfficerEthicsAct,section5. 44 Ibid,PartIV,paragraphs1and2. 22 Section11and12generally. 45 Ibid,paragraph2.1. 74 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Kenya 75

46 Ibid,paragraph2.2. 68 TomOjienda,TheAntiTerrorismBill:Isitvalid?Unpublishedpapersubmitted foraseminarontheBillheldbytheLawSocietyofKenya,Nairobi,2003. 47 Ibid,paragraph6. 69 MachariaGaitho,KenyansmustrejectAnti-TerrorismBill,DailyNation,2July 48 Ibid,paragraph5. 2003. 49 RepublicvCrucialPropertiesLtd. 70 HarrisonKinyanjui,Anti-terrorlawwillrollbackKenya’scivilliberties,TheEast 50 CentralBankofKenya,ForexBureauGuidelines,p2. African,June30toJuly72003,p4. 51 Ibid,paragraph3.3. 52 Ibid,paragraph3.5. 53 AOdera,HowdrugmoneyislaunderedinKenya,ExpressionToday,11 February1999,p3. 54 Ibid. 55 CentralBankofKenya,opcit,paragraph1.2. 56 InterviewwithamemberofstaffofthePostalCorporationsofKenya,July 2002. 57 EmailcorrespondencewithMickelEdwerdoftheUnitedNationsDrugControl Programme,July2002. 58 Ibid. 59 Ibid. 60 UndertheBuildingSocietiesAct,Chapter489,LawsofKenya. 61 TheRegulationonlycoversfinancialinstitutionsasdefinedintheAct,whichdo notincludebuildingsocieties. 62 IntheGoldenbergscandal,(Kenya’sworstfinancialscandal),ithasbeen claimedthattheknownarchitectofthescandalactednotonlyforhimselfbut alsoforthethen-rulingeliteinKenyawithwhomhehadarrangementsbased onfear. 63 ThechaoticstateofKenya’slandandcompanyregistersisdiscussedbythe authorfullyinapreviousunpublishedpaperpreparedfortheInstitutefor SecurityStudies,entitled‘TypologiesoflaunderinginKenya’. 64 See,forexample,theAnti-CorruptionandEconomicCrimesAct,2003. 65 Chapter75,LawsofKenya. 66 InterconServicesLimitedvStandardCharteredBank(unreported),HighCourt CivilCaseNo.761of1985. 67 BosireMaragia,ThepitfallsoftheAnti-TerrorismBill,throughemail,8July 2003.MaragiaisaKenyalawyerworkingintheUS. 76 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Lesotho 77

CHAPTER4 Lesothohasnowbeenplacedinapositionwhereithastokeepupthe momentumtoportrayagenuineandsustainedcommitmenttofightcorruption. THE CAPACITY OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS This,ofnecessity,requiresacommitmenttoputinplaceinstitutional AND THE BUSINESS SECTOR IN LESOTHO TO mechanismstofightnotonlycorruption,butalsomoneylaundering,which DETECT AND CONTROL MONEY LAUNDERING hasbeenshowntofacilitateothercrimes. Theinternationalcommunityhasbecomeincreasinglyawareofthedangers MokhiboNomziGwintsa posedbymoneylaundering.TheUnitedNations(UN)andotherinternational organisationshavecommittedthemselvestoplayingamoreeffectiverolein fightingmoneylaundering. Introductionandinternationalframework Thetwelvemajormultilateralconventionsonterrorismthathavebeenadopted InthisChaptermoneylaunderingisdefinedasencompassing: inthelastthreedecadessetoutstates’responsibilitiesincombatingterrorism. Lesothosignedthe1999InternationalConventionfortheSuppressionofthe allactivitiestodisguiseorconcealthenatureorsourceof,orentitlement FinancingofTerrorism.TheConventionappliestotheoffenceofdirect tomoneyorproperty,orrightstoeither,beingmoneyorpropertyor involvementorcomplicityintheintentionalandunlawfulprovisionorcollection rightsacquiredfromseriouseconomiccrimeorcorruption,aswellas offunds,withtheintentionorknowledgethatanypartofthefundsmaybe allactivitiestodisguiseorconcealmoneyorpropertythatisintended usedtocarryoutanoffence.Statepartiesarerequiredtotakeappropriate tobeusedincommitting,ortofacilitatethecommissionof,serious measures,inaccordancewithdomesticlegalprinciples,forthedetectionand crime.1 freezing,seizureorforfeitureoffundsusedorallocatedforpurposesof committingtheoffences.Statepartiesalsohaveanobligationtoestablishtheir Theprimaryobjectiveofmoneylaunderingistoconvert‘dirty’moneyinto jurisdictionoveroffencesdescribed,maketheoffencespunishableby someotherlegitimateasset,toconcealtheillegalsourceororiginofincome appropriatepenalties,takeallegedoffendersintocustody,prosecuteorextradite fromsuchactivitiesasdrugtrafficking,armssmugglingandfinancialcrime. allegedoffenders,co-operateinpreventivemeasuresandexchangeinformation Globalisation,communicationandtechnologyservetofacilitateeasyandspeedy andevidenceneededinrelatedcriminalproceedings.3 movementofmoneyallovertheworld,thusmakingthedetectionofmoney 2 launderingmoredifficult. LesothoalsosignedandratifiedtheUnitedNationsConventionAgainst TransnationalOrganizedCrimein2000,thusassuminganobligationtocombat Thequesttocombatmoneylaunderingstemsfromincreasingrecognitionof moneylaunderingandtocriminalisethelaunderingofproceedsofcrime. thelinkbetweenmoneylaunderingandseriouscrime.Successfulmoney Anotherimportantobligationisthatofinstitutingacomprehensiveregulatory launderingactivitiesnotonlyenrichcriminalsbutalsoassistinfundingmore andsupervisoryregimeforbankingandnon-bankingfinancialinstitutionswhich seriouscriminalactivity.Moneylaunderingiscloselylinkedtoeconomiccrimes 4 suchasfraud,bribery,corruption,exchangecontrolviolations,taxevasion aresusceptibletomoneylaundering. and,moreseriously,tointernationalterrorism. TheUnitedNationsSecurityCouncilunanimouslyadoptedResolution1373 th Inrecentyears,Lesothohasbeenundertheinternationalspotlightoveravariety of28 September2001.UndertheResolution,allstatesareobligedtoprevent ofcriminalandcivilcasesarisingfromthecorruptionandbriberyofatop andsuppressthefinancingofterrorismaswellastocriminalisethewillful officialbyanumberofinternationalcompanies.Somemajorinternational provisionorcollectionoffundsforsuchacts.Provisionisalsomadeforfreezing bankswereusedtofacilitatethelaunderingoftheproceeds.Therevelations thefunds,financialassetsandeconomicresourcesofboththosewhocommit broughtintoquestiontheintegrityoftheseinstitutionsandhadapotentially orattempttocommitterroristacts,orparticipateinorfacilitatethecommission damagingeffectontheirreputation. ofterroristacts,andthosepersonsandentitiesactingonbehalfofterrorists. 78 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Lesotho 79

Statesarealsoexpectedtoaffordoneanotherthegreatestmeasureofassistance ThefunctionsoftheCentralBank,assetoutinsection6,are: incriminalinvestigationsorproceedingsrelatingtothefinancingorsupportof terroristacts.Notehasbeentakenofthecloseconnectionbetweeninternational a) Tofostertheliquidity,solvencyandproperfunctioningofastable terrorismandtransnationalorganisedcrime,illicitdrugs,moneylaundering market-basedfinancialsystem; andtheillegalmovementofnuclear,chemical,biologicalandotherdeadly b) Toissue,manageandredeemthecurrencyofLesotho; materials.5 c) Toformulate,adoptandexecutethemonetarypolicyofLesotho; d) Toformulate,adoptandexecutetheforeignexchangepolicyof Lesothohasnotonlyshowncommitmentbysigningthevariousinternational Lesotho; instrumentsbutisalsoputtinginplacemeasurestoimplementthemthrough e) Tolicenseorregisterandsuperviseinstitutionspursuanttothe domestication.Consultationsarecurrentlyongoingamongallrelevant FinancialInstitutionsAct1999,theMoneyLendersAct1989, stakeholdersontheprocessandmodalitiesofdomestication.Acommitteehas theBuildingFinanceInstitutionsAct1976andtheInsuranceAct beenformedtospearheadthisprocess.6Informationisalsobeingcompiledby 1976; thedifferentstakeholders,specificallytowardsimplementingResolution1373, f) Toown,holdandmanageitsofficialinternationalreserves; onindividualsectorneedsaswellasprogrammesinplacetoaddressmoney g) Toactasbankerandadviserto,andfiscalagent,ofthegovernment laundering. ofLesotho; h) Topromotetheefficientoperationofthepaymentssystem; Methodology i) Topromotethesafeandsounddevelopmentofthefinancial system;and j) Tomonitorandregulatethecapitalmarket. Anauditwasundertakenofalllawswhichhavepotentialimplicationsformoney laundering.Thisprocessfacilitatedthedevelopmentofdatacollectiontools, Section47designatestheCentralBankas: asthedearthoflegislationonmoneylaunderingshowedthatstructured questionswouldworkbetterforthecommercialandbusinesssector,while • theCommissionerofFinancialInstitutionsintermsoftheFinancial questionnaireswouldworkwellforthebankinginstitutions.Groupandindividual InstitutionsAct1999andtheMoneyLendersAct1989; interviewswereusedforboththequestionnairesandthestructuredquestions. • theCommissionerofBuildingFinanceInstitutionsintermsoftheBuilding Whatemergedearlyintheresearchprocesswasthatquiteanumberofthe FinanceInstitutionsAct1976;and relevantinstitutions,withtheexceptionofthebanks,initiallydidnotunderstand • theCommissionerofInsuranceintermsoftheInsuranceAct1976. theconceptofmoneylaundering,particularlyatthemicrolevelwhereitis likelytoaffectmostofthem.Thefewthatdidunderstanditbelievedthattheir operationswerenotexposedtomoneylaundering,asitisaphenomenon FinancialInstitutionsAct,1999 oftenassociatedwithinternationaltransactionsinlargeamountsofmoney. ThisActprovidesfortheauthorisation,supervisionandregulationoffinancial institutions,agentsoffinancialinstitutionsandancilliaryfinancialservice Supervisory/regulatoryregime:TheCentralBankofLesotho providers.TheActdefinesafinancialinstitutionas“aninstitutionwhichperforms bankingbusinessorcreditbusiness”. 7IntermsoftheAct,theCentralBank CentralBankofLesothoAct,2000 servesasCommissioneroffinancialinstitutions.Intheexerciseofthisfunction, theCentralBanklicensesfinancialinstitutions,agentsoffinancialinstitutions ThepurposeoftheActistocontinuetheexistenceoftheCentralBankof andancilliaryfinancialserviceproviderssuchasforeignexchangedealing Lesotho(theCentralBank),toenableittoensurepricestabilityandtoprovide services,electronicfundtransferservicesetc.IntermsofSection49,theCentral foritsadministrationandcontrol. Bankisalsoresponsibleforthesupervisionoffinancialinstitutionsandother licensedinstitutions. 80 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Lesotho 81

Section26providesforsecrecyofinformationofanon-publicnaturerelating conformitywiththe2000Guidelinesandthat,aspartoftheNedcorGroup toalicensedinstitutionoranycustomerofsuchaninstitution. (RSA),implementstheNedcorGrouppolicyof2001onmoneylaundering. TheStandardBankGroupsimilarlyimplementstheGuidelinesaswellasan anti-moneylaunderingcontrolpolicyfortheStandardBankGroupinthewhole FinancialInstitutions(Anti-MoneyLaundering)Guidelines,2000 ofAfrica.Bothbanks’policiesaresaidtohavemoreorlesssimilarcomponents totheGuidelines. InpursuanceofitsfunctionasCommissioneroffinancialinstitutions,theCentral BankofLesothoprescribedtheFinancialInstitutions(Anti-MoneyLaundering) ThecomplianceofficersinterviewedshowedthatNedbankLesothoexercises Guidelines,2000(hereaftertheGuidelines). self-regulationonmoneylaunderingbyensuringcompliancewithlegislation, internalcontrols,policiesandprocedures.Theseprocessesarerolledouttoall TheobjectivesoftheGuidelinesare: staffmembers,includingthoseatbranchesinMaseruandotherdistricts.The • torequirefinancialinstitutionstoestablishandmaintainspecificpolicies officersconcernedstatethattheyalsoconducttrainingforallstaffmembersin andprocedurestoguardagainsttheuseofthefinancialsystemforthe theappreciationofthebackgroundtomoneylaundering,theprimarypurpose purposeofmoneylaundering; ofwhichistoraiseawarenessofmoneylaundering.Thecontentofthetraining includesdefiningwhatconstitutesmoneylaundering,themostcommonforms • toenablefinancialinstitutionstorecognisesuspicioustransactionsandto ofmoneylaundering,achievingcomprehensiveknowledgeoftheclient,the provideanaudittrailoftransactionswithcustomerswhocomeunder detectionofsuspicioustransactions,dealingwithlargecashtransactions,the investigation;and possiblelinkbetweeninvestment-relatedtransactionsandinternationalactivity tomoneylaundering. • torequirefinancialinstitutionstosubmitreportsandtodiscloseinformation onlargecashtransactionsandsuspicioustransactions. Customeridentificationandrecordkeeping TheGuidelinesdefinemoneylaunderingas: Sub-guideline6prohibitsfinancialinstitutionsfromkeepinganonymous accountsoraccountsinfictitiousnames.TheGuidelinesfurtherenjoinfinancial Anyactorattemptedacttoconcealordisguisetheidentityofillegally institutionstoidentifytheircustomerswhenestablishingbusinessrelationsor obtainedproceedssothattheyappeartohaveoriginatedfrom conductingtransactions.Thisidentificationhastobebasedonofficialorother legitimatesources. reliableidentifyingdocumentationandrecords.Specificreferenceismade underthissub-guidelinetothefollowingtransactions: Anti-moneylaunderingprogrammes • theopeningofaccountsorpassbooks; Sub-guideline5providesthatfinancialinstitutionsshalldevelopprogrammes againstmoneylaundering.Theseprogrammesaretoinclude,interalia,internal • fiduciarytransactions; controls,policiesandproceduresincludingthedesignationofcompliance • therentingofsafety-depositboxes; officersatmanagementlevel.Theprogrammesfurthermorehavetoprovide forcustomeridentificationprocedures,recordkeeping,recognitionand • theuseofsafecustodyfacilities; reportingofsuspicioustransactionsandeducationandtrainingofrelevant employees. • largecashtransactions.

TherearetwocommercialbanksinLesotho:theStandardBankGroupand Sub-guidelines8and9requirefinancialinstitutionstomaintainarecordon NedbankLesotho.Interviewswereheldwithcomplianceofficersofboththese customeridentification,suchascopiesofofficialidentificationdocuments, banksandwithseniorofficersoftheCentralBankinthepolicyandexchange accountfilesandbusinesscorrespondence,foratleasttenyearsafteranaccount controldivision.TheinformationprovidedwasthatNedbankLesothoactsin isclosed.Recordswhichcanenablefinancialinstitutionstocomplywith 82 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Lesotho 83 informationrequestsfromcompetentauthoritiesarealsotobekeptfora FinancialinstitutionsarealsorequiredtoreporttotheCentralBankany minimumperiodoftenyears.Suchrecordsaretobekeptinsuchaformasto transactionaboveM100,000within30daysofmonth-end.Theseare enablereconstructionofindividualtransactionsasevidenceincriminal transactionswhichinvolvecashor‘nearcash’,forexample,travellers’cheques, proceedings. bearerbondsandothereasilynegotiablemonetaryinstruments.

Afurtherrequirementundersub-guideline10isforfinancialinstitutionsto Inthequesttoprotectthemselvesfrommisusebypotentiallaunderersandin reviewandproperlydocumentthebackgroundandpurposeofallcomplex, ordertopreservethebank’sreputation,theStandardBankGrouppolicy unusuallylargetransactionsandallunusualtransactionswhichhavenoapparent requiresthatsuspicioustransactionsarereportedtotheBank’sheadofficein economicorvisiblelawfulpurpose. Johannesburg.ThereportsarehandledbytheGroup’santi-moneylaundering officer,whointurnreportstotheSouthAfricanReserveBank.Apersonwho TheGuidelineshavebeenenactedintermsofSection71oftheFinancial conductssuspicioustransactionscouldbedeclaredapersonanongratawithin InstitutionsActandarebytheirverynaturesubsidiarytothemainAct.The theGroup.ItwasalsostatedthatbranchesoftheStandardBankhaveestablished CentralBankofLesothohasenactedtheGuidelinespursuanttoitsmandatein theirowninternalcontrolsoverandabovethoserequired,todealwithwhat termsoftheAct,tomake,amongothers,suchguidelinesasarenecessaryfor theyterm“unusualtransactions”.Thesearetransactionswithanunusualpattern thebetterormoreconvenientimplementationoftheAct.Section26ofthe fromthatexpectedbybankofficialsandwhicharethereforechecked. Actprovidesfornon-disclosureofinformationofanon-publicnaturerelating tobankcustomers.Sub-guideline6prohibitsbanksfromkeepinganonymous TheGuidelinesmakeprovisionforabanktoapplytotheCentralBankfor accountsoraccountsinfictitiousnames. exemptionfromreportingsomeclientsintermsofthelargecashtransaction sub-guideline.Thesewouldbeclientswhofrequentlydealinlargeamountsof Bankshavetobalancecustomersecrecyagainsttheirbankingreputationwhere money.Thisprovisionrendersbanksvulnerabletomoneylaunderingasall suchsecrecyrendersthemvulnerabletomisuse.Itisintheinterestofbanksto thatamoneylaundererhastodoisestablishapatterninhis/hertransactions beseentobeattractinghonestcustomersandinvestorsandtobedealingin whichautomaticallyprotectshimfromscrutiny.Itwouldalsoseemtoopen legitimatefunds.ThedraftMoneyLaunderingandProceedsofCrimeBillhas thebanksuptotheriskofemployeesbeingtoolaxaboutsuchcustomersto aclausewhichspecificallyoverridessecrecyobligationsandotherrestrictions evenpayattentionwhenthecustomerbeginstotransactinanunusualmanner. ondisclosureofinformation. Inpractice,however,bankofficialssaytheyhavenotsoughtthisexemption.It wasfurtherrevealedthattheissueisbeingmootedwithaviewtowardsremoving Intermsofsub-guideline7,whereacustomerorclientconductsatransaction theexemption. onbehalfofanotherperson,theBankisobligedtorequirethatthetrueidentity ofthepersononwhosebehalftheaccountisopenedortransactionconducted Anotherpotentiallyproblematicareaseemstobethereportingofsuspicious bedisclosed.Thisrequirementextends,forexample,toattorneysinrespectof transactions.Itwouldseemthatlargecashtransactionsareroutinelyreported, trustfunds. whilethesamediligencecannotbesaidofsuspicioustransactions,especially whenitcomestoreportingtolawenforcementagencies.Theperceptionis Reportingrequirements thatbankofficialsdonotreportsuspicioustransactionsastheyareenjoinedto doforfearofreprisalsasthereisalackoffaithinthepolicetodealwith Sub-guideline11requiresfinancialinstitutionstoreporttolawenforcement reportsinconfidenceandtoprotecttheidentitiesoftheofficialswhoreport. authoritiesandtotheCentralBankanytransactionthattheinstitutionsuspects MembersoftheFraudUnitoftheLesothoPoliceServiceconcededthatreports mayformpartofacriminalactivityorthatotherwiseconstitutesasuspicious ofsuspicioustransactionswereveryfewinnumber. transaction.Undersub-guideline18,reportsarealsoimmediatelytobemade totheCentralBankpertainingtoanyknowledgeorsuspicionofmoney TheGuidelinesdonotempowerlawenforcementofficialstocompelbank launderingrelatedtoaspecificcustomerortransaction. officialstoreportsuspicioustransactions.ItisonlytheCentralBankthathas powerstoimposepenaltieswhereabankfailstoobservetheGuidelinesina 84 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Lesotho 85 flagrantmanner.TheAntiMoney-LaunderingandProceedsofCrimeBill Bankshavetraditionallyoperatedonthebasicpremiseofensuringcustomer establishestheAntiMoney-LaunderingAuthoritywhichwillserveasthe confidentiality.Itstandstoreason,therefore,thatitposesachallengetothem country’sfinancialintelligenceunit(FIU).ThefactthattheBillstillhastobe tobalancetheinterestsoftheirclientstoconfidentialitywiththerequirement passedintolawhasledtoanarrangementwherebysomemembersofthe toreportwhatmaylooklikeanunusualorsuspicioustransaction,particularly FraudUnithavebeendesignatedascontactpointsforreportsofsuspicious asitmayturnouttobeafalsealarm.Alotofeffortisrequiredtoemphasise transactions.Theseofficersarenotspeciallytrainedtodealwithissuesofmoney theadvantagesforbankstokeepacleanimageandtoprotectthemselves launderingandtheyarealsosupposedtodealwithsuspiciousreportsaswell frommisusebycriminalelements. asotherdutiespertainingtofraud.TheFraudUnitalsohasnomechanismsfor initiatinginvestigationsunlessareportofasuspicioustransactionhasbeen CentralBankofLesotho(CollectiveInvestmentSchemes) madetoit. Regulations,2001 Interviewswereconductedwithbankcustomerstoverifycontrolsthatthe TheobjectiveoftheseRegulationsistointroduce,forthefirsttime,aframework financialinstitutionspurporttohaveputinplaceandtoalsodeterminethe forregulatingcollectiveinvestmentschemeswithaviewtoencouragingthe extenttowhichthepublicisawareoftheconceptofmoneylaundering.A growthofsuchcapitalinstrumentswithoutcompromisinginvestorprotection. randomselectionofcustomerswasmadeamongindividualsandbusiness TheRegulationsareaimedprimarilyatregulatingsuchasunittrusts,which people.Frominformationprovided,itseemsthatthebanksareconsistentin weresetupinLesothoonlyafewyearsago. thedocumentstheyrequireforpurposesofopeningbankaccountsinorderto verifycustomers’identities.Inthecaseofbusinesses,thebanksaresaidto A‘collectiveinvestmentscheme’isdefinedasascheme,inwhateverform,in requiredocumentssuchasacertificateofincorporationofacompanyaswell pursuanceofwhichmembersofthepublicareinvitedorpermittedtoinvest asthememorandumofthecompanyandarticlesofassociation. moneyorotherassetsinaportfolio,andwhichschemehasthefollowing characteristics: Somebusinesspeoplewhousuallytransactedinlargeamountsofmoney • twoormoreinvestorscontributemoneyorotherassetstoholda complainedofalackofconsistencywithinthebankingindustryintermsof participatoryinterestinaportfoliooftheschemethroughshares,unitsor requirementsforbanktransfersandbankscheques.Itemergedthatbanktellers anyotherformofparticipatoryinterest;and oftenmadedifferentrequirementsforsimilartransactions.Accordingto • theinvestorssharetheriskandthebenefitofinvestmentinproportionto informationprovidedbybankofficials,allbankemployeesaretrainedin theirparticipatoryinterestinaportfolioofaschemeoronanyotherbasis complianceprocedures.Theaimistostandardisethewayworkiscarriedout determinedinthedeed. andtoimplementnewrequirementspertainingtoissuessuchasdetection andcontrolofmoneylaundering.Thismeansthatminimumrequirements TheCentralBankofLesothoistheRegistrarandhassupervisoryauthorityover havetobemet,regardlessofwhichtellerorbankofficialacustomerdeals collectiveinvestmentschemes.TheRegistrar’spowersincludeappointing with.Consistencyanduniformityinimplementationarenecessarytoensure examinerstoinvestigateandexaminebooks,documents,accountsand theeffectivenessofcontrolmeasures. transactionsofcollectiveinvestmentschemes,withaviewtoensuring compliancewiththeRegulationsandtosafeguardtheinterestsofinvestors. Amajorcomplaintbycustomerswasthatbanksdonotprovidethemwith TheCentralBankonlyembarkedonprogrammestoimplementthese sufficientinformationwhenintroducingchanges.Customerssaytheyoften Regulationsin2003.8 discoveronlywhentheytrytoundertakeatransactionthattheycannolonger doso.Amajorityofcustomersweresurprisedthatsometransactionsthey InsuranceAct,1976andInsuranceRegulations,1985 routinelyundertookcouldconstitutesuspicioustransactions.Acommon understandingofmoneylaunderingalsoturnedouttobethatitwasassociated ThemainaimoftheInsuranceAct,1976istoprovidefortheregulationand withhugeamountsofmoneyandseriousinternationalcrimes,suchasdrug supervisionofinsurancebusinessinLesotho.Itthereforefocusesonsetting trafficking,andthatitthereforedidnotaffecttheordinaryperson. outconditionsandrequirementsofconductinginsurancebusiness. 86 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Lesotho 87

Insurersandinsuranceintermediariescanbecomesusceptibletomoney • failstocommenceoperationswithinaperiodofoneyear; launderingthroughthepurchaseoflifepolicies,personalinvestmentproducts • failstocomplywiththeconditionsofthelicence; andgeneralinsurance.9Insurancebusinessusuallyinvolveslargeamountsof money,whichrenderstheindustryvulnerabletomisusebymoneylaunderers. • isinbreachofanyprovisionofthisAct;or Inspiteofthisvulnerability,legislationregulatinginsurancebusinessissilent • ceasestocarryonthemoneylendingbusiness. onmoneylaundering. TheAmendmentalsorequiresthatquarterlyreturnsshowtheassetsand Informationprovidedbyinsurersforthisresearchshowsthattheprimary liabilitiesoftheholder.Everymoneylendermustproducerecordsand concernofinsurersisnothowaclientobtainedhis/hermoney,butwhethera informationrelatingtothebusinessforexamination.Theseincludeanybooks, clientcanpayandcontinuestopayforcover.Clientcompaniesownedbythe minutes,accounts,cash,securitiesdocumentsandvouchers.Furthermore,every Chinese,inparticular,aresaidtotransactmostlyincash.Mostshort-terminsurers licensedmoneylenderhastoappointanauditor,approvedbythe concedethattheyhavenomechanismsinplaceforscreeningclients.Theonly Commissioner,toaudittheaccountsandreportupononanannualbasisthe requirementforcompaniesisthattheyproducepapersofregistrationora annualbalancesheetandprofitandlossaccount.TheCentralBankanalyses tradinglicence. theseauditedfinancialreportsinordertopickupanyirregularities.

TheCentralBankhasregulatorypowersovertheinsuranceindustry.This Ininterviewswithsomeofthelicensedmoneylenders,theystatedthatmost functioniscarriedoutbytheCentralBank’sFinancialInstitutionsSupervisory oftheirclientsaregovernmentemployeesaswellasemployeesofprivate Division,throughon-siteauditingofinsurersandoff-siteanalysisofreturns organisations.Thereasonforthisistominimisetheriskofnon-paymentasthe submittedbyinsurersintermsoftheAct.Accordingtothebank’sofficials, moneylendersarrangestop-orderfacilitieswiththeemployersforregular theytakecognisanceoftheirobligationtodetectandcontrolmoneylaundering withdrawalsfromthesalariesoftheiremployeestopayofftheirloans. inundertakingthisanalysis.TheCentralBankisalsosaidtobelookinginto revisingtheInsuranceActandtheRegulations,inordertoaddresscurrent Acommonperceptionisthatmoneylaunderingdoesnotreallyfeatureinthis challengessuchasthatofmoneylaundering. industryasitcommonlydealswithrelativelysmallamountsofmoney,forexample, maximumamountsofaboutM10,000.00).Themostfrequentusersofmoney Theinsuranceindustryfallsunderthedefinitionof‘cashdealer’underthe lendingactivitiesarelower-incomeemployees,whileotherclientsusethefacility MoneyLaunderingandProceedsofCrimeBill.Thevulnerabilityofthisindustry onceinawhileasatemporarystop-gapmeasurewhileawaitingsomefunds. tomoneylaunderingillustratestheneedforenactmentoftheBillintolawso thattheindustrycandischargeitsobligationstowardstheAnti-Money Moneylenderscouldthemselvesengageinmoneylaunderingbyusingtainted LaunderingAuthority. fundswhichtheywouldthengetbackascleanfunds,plusinterest.This, however,wouldrequirediligenceonthepartoftheregulatingauthorityin MoneyLendersOrder,1989(asamendedbytheMoneyLenders issuinglicences. Act,1993) Institutionalmechanisms Priorto1989,moneylendersoperatedfreelyinLesothoandoftencharged theirclientsexorbitantinterestrates.In1989,thegovernmentenactedthe Anti-moneylaunderingauthority MoneyLendersOrdertorequirethelicensingofmoneylendersandtoregulate moneylendingoperations. MoneyLaunderingandProceedsofCrimeDraftBill,2001 Lesotho’sMoneyLaunderingandProceedsofCrimeDraftBillhasbeenin In1993,theOrderwasamendedtointroduceaclauseontherevocationof existencesince2001.TheCentralBankofLesothoisthecustodianofthedraft moneylenders’licences.ItempowerstheCommissionerofFinancialInstitutions Bill.Ithastakenaninordinatelylongtimetobeprocessed.Initiallythe (theCentralBank),torevokealicenceiftheholder: 88 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Lesotho 89 explanationforthedelaywasthatconsultationswerebeingheld,including CentralBankbyvirtueoftheCentralBank’ssupervisoryroleoverfinancial withtheInternationalMonetaryFund. 10Atthetimeofwritingthisreport,in institutions. mid-2003,theBillwasstillatastagewherecommentswerebeingincorporated, afterwhichitwasgoingtobeforwardedtotheofficeofParliamentaryCounsel. TheBillalsomakesprovisionforseizureofsuspiciousimportsorexportsof TheofficeofParliamentaryCounselwasatthetimealreadyinconsultations currency,hasoverridingeffectoversecrecylawsorotherrestrictionson withtheCentralBankonthedraftBill.Thenextstepwouldbetoseekcabinet disclosureofinformationandprovidesimmunityforactiontakeningoodfaith approval,afterwhichtheBillcouldthenbeplacedbeforeparliament.Inspite byfinancialinstitutionsandcashdealersandtheiremployeesorrepresentatives. ofinternationalpressurebeingbroughttobearonLesothotoenactthisBill Provisionisalsomadeforconfiscationoftaintedpropertyandforpecuniary intolawandcontrarytoindicationsthatitwouldhavebeenplacedbefore penaltyorders. parliamentandpassedbeforetheendof2003,theBillhadstillnotbeen placedbeforeParliamentbymid-2004. PartIIofthedraftBillsetsupanAnti-MoneyLaunderingAuthority(hereafter, theAuthority).ThisAuthorityistheDirectorateonCorruptionandEconomic TheMoneyLaunderingandProceedsofCrimedraftBillattemptstolegislate OffencesestablishedpursuanttothePreventionofCorruptionandEconomic onmoneylaunderinginacomprehensivemanner.Thepreamblesetsoutthe OffencesAct,1999. purposeoftheBillasbeingtoenabletheunlawfulproceedsofallserious crimetobeidentified,traced,frozen,seizedandeventuallyconfiscated. IntermsofSection11(2)ofthedraftbill,theAuthority:

Moneylaunderingisdefinedas: • shallreceivereportsofsuspicioustransactionsissuedbyfinancialinstitutions andcashdealerspursuanttosection14(1); anyactorattemptedacttoconcealordisguisetheidentityofillegally obtainedproceedssothattheyappeartohaveoriginatedfroma • shallsendanysuchreporttotheappropriatelawenforcementauthorities, legitimatesource. if,havingconsideredthereport,theDirectoratealsohasreasonablegrounds tosuspectthatthetransactionissuspicious; ThedraftBillfurthermorebringsfinancialinstitutionsandcashdealerswithin theambitofitsoperation.Cashdealersaredefinedasinsurers,insurance • mayenterthepremisesofanyfinancialinstitutionorcashdealerduring intermediaries,securitiesdealers,futuresbrokers,operatorsofgamblinghouses, ordinarybusinesshourstoinspectanyrecordkeptpursuanttosection14(1), casinosorlotteries,personswhocarryonabusinessofissuing,sellingor andaskanyquestionrelatingtosuchrecord,makenotesandtakecopies redeemingtravellers’cheques,moneyordersorsimilarinstruments,ofdealing ofwholeorpartoftherecord; inbullionorofcollecting,holdinganddeliveringcashaspartofabusinessof • shallsendtotheappropriatelawenforcementauthorities,anyinformation providingpayrollservices,andtrusteesormanagersofunittrusts. derivedfromaninspectioncarriedoutpursuanttoparagraph(c),ifitgives theDirectoratereasonablegroundstosuspectthatatransactioninvolves TheobligationscurrentlyimposedonfinancialinstitutionsbytheFinancial proceedsofcrime; Institutions(Anti-MoneyLaundering)Guidelines,2000, arealsoextendedto cashdealersunderthedraftBill.Theseobligationsincludeverifyingtheidentity • mayinstructanyfinancialinstitutionorcashdealertotakesuchstepsas ofacustomer,establishingandmaintainingcustomerrecords,reporting maybeappropriatetofacilitateanyinvestigationanticipatedbythe suspicioustransactions,establishingandmaintaininginternalreporting Directorate; proceduresandprovidingtrainingtoemployeesintherecognitionandhandling ofmoneylaunderingtransactions.Enforcementoflegislationonmoney • maycompilestatisticsandrecords,disseminateinformationwithinLesotho launderingwill,intermsofthedraftBill,nowliewiththeAnti-MoneyLaundering orelsewhere,makerecommendationsarisingoutofanyinformation Authority.Financialinstitutionsstillretaintheobligationtoadoptprudent received,issueguidelinestofinancialinstitutionsandadvisetheMinister measurestocombatmoneylaundering,aswellobligationstoreporttothe accordingly; 90 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Lesotho 91

• shallcreatetrainingrequirementsandprovidesuchtrainingforanyfinancial Offences,callsfordifferenttreatmentinrelationtoinvestigationandprosecution institutioninrespectoftransactionrecord-keepingandreportingobligations becauseoftheamountofmoneyinvolvedorthecomplexityandnatureofthe providedforinsection13(1)and14(1); transaction.Section8oftheActempowerstheDirectortoobtaininformation toassistorexpediteinvestigationsintooffencesofcorruptionoreconomic • mayconsultwithanyrelevantperson,institutionororganisationforthe offences.Suchinformationshallbefurnishedbysuspectedpersons,persons purposeofexercisingitspowersordutiesunderparagraph(e),(f)or(g); whomtheDirectorbelievesthatthesuspectedpersonhasanyfinancialor and businessdealingswithandthemanagerofanybank.Personsservedwitha • shallnotconductanyinvestigationintomoneylaunderingotherthanfor noticeunderthissectionshallcomplywiththerequirementsofthenotice thepurposeofensuringcompliancebyafinancialinstitutionwiththe notwithstandinganyoathofsecrecythattheymayhaveinplace. provisionsofthispart. IntermsofSection36oftheAct,theDirectormayholdaninquiryifhehas Oneofthemajorweaknessesofthissectionisthat,byusingtheword‘may’,it reasontosuspectthataseriouseconomicoffencehasbeenorisbeing doesnotalwaysimposeanobligationonthedirectoratetoenforceits committedorthatanattempthasbeenorisbeingmadetocommitsuchan responsibilities.ThefactthattheAuthoritycanonlyconductinvestigationsfor offence.TheDirectorshallalsoholdaninquiryrefereedbytheAttorney-General purposesofensuringcompliancebyafinancialinstitutionisaweaknessasit inrelationtotheallegedcommissionorattemptedcommissionofaserious doesnotmakeprovisionforinvestigationstoleadtoenforcement,whichmay economicoffence. beanecessaryfollow-up. Section37entitlestheAttorney-General,upontherequestoftheDirectorand PreventionofCorruptionandEconomicOffencesAct,1999 uponobtainingacourtordertothateffect,toseizeorfreezebankaccountsor assetsofanypersontheDirectorreasonablysuspectstohavecommittedan ThePreventionofCorruptionandEconomicOffencesAct,1999establishes offenceundertheAct. theDirectorateonCorruptionandEconomicOffenceswhichwillserveas Lesotho’sAnti-MoneyLaunderingAuthority.TheActfurthermakesprovision Section49makesitanoffenceforanypersontodisclosewithoutlawfulauthority forthepreventionofcorruptionandconferspowerontheDirectorateto orreasonableexcuse,toanypersonwhoisthesubjectofaninvestigationin investigatesuspectedcasesofcorruptionandeconomiccrime. respectofanoffenceallegedorsuspectedtohavebeencommittedbyhim undertheAct,thefactthatheissubjecttosuchaninvestigationoranydetails ThefunctionsoftheDirectorateare,amongothers,to: ofsuchinvestigation,ortopublishordisclosetoanyotherpersontheidentity ofanypersonwhoisthesubjectofsuchaninvestigation. • receiveandinvestigateanycomplaintsallegingcorruptioninanypublic body; Allindicationsarethattherearenoimmediateplanstoestablishaseparate • investigateanyallegedorsuspectedoffencesunderthisAct,oranyother unitfromtheDirectoratetoserveastheAntiMoney-LaunderingAuthority.In offencedisclosedduringsuchaninvestigation; discussionsheldwiththeDirectoroftheDirectorateonCorruptionand EconomicOffences,theimportanceofhavingthedraftBillpassedintolaw • investigateanyallegedorsuspectedcontraventionofanyoftheprovisions wasemphasised,soastoenabletheDirectoratetodischargeitsfunctionsas ofthefiscalandrevenuelawsofLesotho;and theAnti-MoneyLaunderingAuthority.Amongothersthereareplansforaunit thatwilldealspecificallywithmoneylaundering.Itwaspointedoutthatthe • undertakeanyothermeasuresforthepreventionofcorruptionand DirectoratehadalreadysubmittedsomecommentsonthedraftBilltothe economicoffences. CentralBankandthatplanswerealreadyinplaceforrecruitmentofrelevant Section2oftheActdefinesa‘seriouseconomicoffence’asanyoffencethat, staffaswellasidentificationoftrainingneedsinordertoenhancecapacityto intheopinionoftheDirectorofPreventionofCorruptionandEconomic undertaketheDirectorate’sstatutoryfunctions. 92 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Lesotho 93

TheDirectorate,whichhasonlybeenfunctionalsinceApril2003,hasbeen CommentaryontheSolecase establishedasapublicoffice,pursuanttoSection3(1)oftheAct.TheDirectorate anditsstaffareregulatedbythePublicServiceAct,1995withnecessary On3December1999,MasuphaSole,aformerchiefexecutiveoftheLesotho modificationsorassetoutintheestablishingAct.TheMinisterofJustice,Human HighlandsDevelopmentAuthority(LHDA)wasindicted,togetherwith18other RightsandRehabilitationisresponsiblefortheDirectorateandreceivesannual accused,onchargesofbribery,fraudandperjury.Thechargesaroseoutof reportsfromit. allegationsofbriberyofthechiefexecutivebyvariousinternationalfirms, partnershipsandjointventuresinvolvedinthemulti-milliondollarLesotho ThefactthattheDirectorateisapublicofficerendersitaccountableto HighlandsWaterProject(LHWP). government,eventhoughitcanbearguedthatitisfunctionallyindependent inthedischargeofitsfunctions.WhiletheDirectoratehasbeenfunctionalfor EvidenceledinthecasebeforetheHighCourtshowedthatbetween1991 arelativelyshortperiod,onecan,however,positthatitwillnotbeimmune and1999therewasalreadydissatisfactionamongsomeofMr.Sole’scolleagues fromchallengessuchasundueinfluence.Factorsthatcancontributetothis regardingtheawardingofsomecontractsundertheprojectandfavouritism vulnerabilityincludethefactthatmembersofstaffoftheDirectoratearepublic displayedtowardscontractors’staffoverBasothonationals.Itisalsocommon officerswhomayhavetotakeunpopularactionoverpersonsinauthorityover causethatatthematerialtime,theactivitiesofLHDAandtheLHWPwereof them.TheDirectorateisempoweredtoinvestigateallegationsofcorruptionof nationalinterestasitwasthefirstprojectofitsmagnitudeinthecountryand publicofficers,andundertheAct,theseincludeCabinetMinisters,holdersof oneofthebiggestprojectsinAfrica. statutorypublicofficeandmembersofParliament.

TheDirectoratehastogothroughnormalgovernmentbudgetsystemsand ThePreventionofCorruptionandEconomicOffencesActcameintoforcein allocations.Thiscanbeahindranceasthepublicserviceisrenownedforits 1999.However,theDirectorateonlybecamefunctionalinApril2003.Ifthe bureaucracyandinefficiency,whichwillnotnecessarilytakeintoaccountthe Directoratehadalreadybeenfunctional,thecasewouldhavefallensquarely exigenciesoftheDirectorate’soperations.Thefactthatthepublicserviceis withinitsambitasitsfunctionsinclude,amongothers,toreceiveandinvestigate notusuallyagreatremuneratormayalsohampertheDirectorate’seffortsor anycomplaintsallegingcorruptioninanypublicbodyandtoinvestigatethe desiretoattracthighcalibrestaffastheywillnaturallydemandremuneration conductofanypersonwhichinitsopinionmaybeconnectedwithorconducive thatiscommensuratewiththeirqualificationsandexperienceaswellasthe tocorruption.TheDirectoratealso,importantly,hasthefunctionofadvising demandsoftheirwork.Conduciveworkingconditionsalsoservetominimise headsofpublicbodiesofchangesinpracticesandprocedureswhichare internalcorruptionaswellastoactasanincentivetoattainahighdegreeof necessarytoreducethelikelihoodofcorruptpractices.Anearlyinvestigation performance. wouldperhapshavedetectedirregularitiesinthechiefexecutive’sexecution ofhisdutiesorcouldatleasthavedeterredfurthertransgression. TheDirectoratehastakencognisanceoftheneedforconfidencebuilding betweenitselfandthedifferentstakeholders.Thisincludes,butisnotlimited ThemagnitudeoftheLHWPshouldhaveawakenedthegovernmentofthe to,financialinstitutions,lawenforcementagencies,theCentralBank,the countrytotheneedtoguardagainstcorruption.Numerouspublicauthorities LesothoRevenueAuthorityandthegeneralpublic.Thisconfidencebuildingis whoseactivitiescouldrendertheiremployeessusceptibletocorruptionare crucialinordertoenhancemutualco-operationwhichissonecessaryindealing puttinginplacepolicieswhichrequireemployeestodeclaretheirassetsand withmoneylaundering.TheDirectoratealsoneedsconfidencebuildingfrom keeptrackofanysignsofunexplainedwealthorchangesinlifestyle.The Governmentinorderforittohavethecloutnecessarytodischargeitsfunctions governmentneedstoconsiderputtinglegislationinplaceor,atleast,seeking withoutfearoffavourorprejudice.SofarGovernmenthasportrayeditspolitical amendmentstolegislationthatsetsuppublicandprivatebodies,torequireall willtoaddressissuesofcorruptionthroughenactmentoflegislationandthe employeesandholdersofpublicofficetodeclaretheirassets.Thiswouldgoa Directorate’sestablishment.Thishastogohandinhandwiththeprovisionof longwayasapreventivemeasureandwouldbepreferabletowaitinguntil adequateresourcesandnon-interferenceinthedischargeoftheDirectorate’s functions. therearesignsofcorruptpracticesbeforetakingaction.. 94 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Lesotho 95

LesothoRevenueAuthority BanksgenerallyacknowledgethattheyareawareofthewayinwhichChinese tradersdotheirtransactionsbutthisseemstohavebeenacceptedasnormal. TheLesothoRevenueAuthority(LRA)wasestablishedbytheLesothoRevenue Assuch,itisnotunreasonabletoassumethatalotofwhatwouldconstitute AuthorityAct,2001.Itisthemainbodyresponsiblefortheassessmentand suspicioustransactionsisnotreallyfollowedupduetothisauraofnormality. collectionofspecifiedrevenueonbehalfofgovernmentandforthe administrationandenforcementoflawsrelatingtosuchrevenue. Travelagents OneofthefunctionsoftheLRAistotakenecessarymeasurestocounteract Althoughtheexchangingofcashfortravelticketsisacommonmethodof taxfraudandotherformsoffiscalevasion.TheLRAalsohastoprovideforthe movingmoneyfromonecountrytoanother,thetravelagentsinterviewed establishment,maintenanceandapplicationofsystemsforidentificationof indicatedthatthisisnotacommonpracticeintheirindustry.Theinformation taxpayers.TheDirectorateonCorruptionandEconomicOffenceshastheduty, providedisthatthereisnolimittothenumberofticketsonecanpurchaseand amongothers,toinvestigateallegationsorsuspectedcontraventionofthefiscal thattravelticketscanbecancelledbeforethedeparturedate.However,there andrevenuelawsofLesotho.Thetwobodieshavetoco-operateintheir arepenaltiesinvolved,dependingonthepriceoftheticketandtheairline respectiveduties,whichwillincreasethelikelihoodofidentifyingmoney involved.Wherearefundisdue,itisnotissuedbytheagentbutbytheairline launderingactivities. itselfandtakesseveralweekstoprocess.

Asalreadymentioned,thereisoftenacloselinkbetweenmoneylaundering Intheorynothingstopsalaundererfrompurchasingtravelticketsworldwide andothereconomicoffences.Inanumberofcases,moneylaunderingis andforextendedperiodsandtheneitherusingtheticketsorcancelingthem detectedintheprocessofinvestigatingoffencesliketaxevasionandviceversa. beforethedateofdepartureandthenobtainingarefundfromtheairline. Moneylaunderingisalsofacilitatedthroughtheuseofshellcompanies.Lesotho lacksasystemofkeepingtrackofcompaniesoncetheyareregistered,sothat Estateagents itiseasyforacompanytoexistonpaperonlyortobeengagedinactivities totallydifferentfromthosestipulatedonpaper.IftheLRAfunctionsproperly,it EstateagentshavenoregulatorybodyinLesotho.Allthatisrequiredisthat shouldbeabletoensurethatsuchcompaniesandindividualsdonotescape oneshouldholdtherelevantlicence. scrutinyforcontraventionofrevenuelawsormoneylaunderingactivities. Dealinginpropertycanbeawayformoneylaundererstoinvestillicitfundsor Thecommercialsector asavehicleforlaunderingactivities.Suchpropertydealingscanbeundertaken throughestateagentsusingavarietyofmeans.Anexampleistheuseofshell Investmentpromotion companieswhichareregisteredinsuchawaythatthereisnoapparent connectionwiththelaunderer,eventhough,inreality,thelaundererwillactually ThebulkofinvestmentinLesothoconsistsofexport-orientedmanufacturing ownthecompanyorhaveaninterestinit.Theendresultisthatitbecomes difficulttolinkthelaundererwitheitherthecompanyortheproperty,which industries.Theseindustries,whicharelargelytextileandapparelindustriesare makesconfiscationdifficult. dominatedbyChinesenationals.MostoftheChinesetraderswhodobusiness inLesothoresideintheneighbouringSouthAfricantownofLadybrand.They Thecostofpropertyisnormallyhighenoughtodiscouragedealingincash. generallyreceivetheircapitalthroughbanksinLesotho,whichtheywithdraw Estateagentscanminimisetheirbeingusedbylaunderersbyinsistingon andmovetoSouthAfrica.Theythereforebecomeresponsibleformostofthe paymentbychequeoratleastonthecashbeingdepositedbythebuyerinto cross-bordermovementofmoneyfromLesothointoSouthAfrica,whichin abankaccount.Thiswouldthenrenderthetransactionreportableinmost turnincreasestheriskofmoneylaunderinginthecountry. cases,orwouldatleastfacilitateanaudittrail. 96 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Lesotho 97

Otherrelevantlegalmeasures CasinoOrder,1989 CompaniesAct25,1967 Thepurposeofthislegislationistoprovideforthemanagement,controland licensingofcasinos.Itcontainsnoscreeningrequirements.Itmerelystatesthat TheCompaniesActmakesprovisionfortheconstitution,incorporation, citizensofLesothocanoperateonlyonacashbasis(section26),whichincludes registration,management,administrationandwindingupofcompaniesand travellers’chequesbutexcludespersonalcheques,creditcardsandotherforms otherassociations. ofcredit.Whatthismeansisthatforeignerscanuseanycurrencyandthereis nolimitontheamountofcashthatcanbeusedinthehotels. Inthepast,accountantsandlawyerscouldregistercompaniesonbehalfof clients.ArecentdirectivefromtheOfficeoftheRegistrar-Generalhasremoved Thefactthatanyonecanwalkintoacasinoandgambleusinganunlimited thesepowers. amountofcashrenderstheindustrysusceptibletomoneylaundering.A launderercanpurchasecasinochipsforalargeamountofmoneyandcash TheCompaniesActstipulatesthatforeignersareonlyabletoregistercompanies themback,thusenablinghimtoexchangetaintedmoneyforcleanmoney. iftheyhavealocalcounterpart.Intheprocessoffacilitatingregistrationof Casinosstatethat,inpractice,theyexchangecasinochipsforthecurrencywhich suchcompanies,lawyerssometimesendupbeingshareholders.Thiscanresult apersonusedtopurchasethechips.However,thisdoesnotminimisemoney launderingasthepurposeisnotnecessarilytoacquireadifferentcurrency. inlawyersunwittinglybeingshareholdersinshellcompaniesthataresetup merelytofacilitateillicitactivities,suchasmoneylaundering.Thissituationis madeeasybythefacttheonceacompanyisregistered,thereisnofollow-up LotteriesAct,1975 fromtheregisteringauthorityonwhetherthecompanyisactuallyfunctioningor whetheritisundertakingtheactivitiesitwasregisteredtoundertake.Manyof ThepurposeoftheLotteriesActistoprovidefortheestablishment,promotion thesecompaniesareusedinternationallytomakefictitiouspaymentsandmove andconductofstateandotherlotteries.Lesothohasnothadanylotteriesin moneythatis,inmostcases,tainted. recentyears.Moneylaundererscanusetheguiseoflotterywinningstoexplain illegallyacquiredfunds.IntermsoftheMoneyLaunderingandProceedsof Accountantscanbeinvolvedinmoneylaundering,sometimeswithouttheir CrimeDraftBill,apersonwhooperatesalotteryfallsunderthedefinitionofa knowledge,intheprovisionoftheirprofessionaladviceoninvestmentsand cashdealer.Thismeansthatsuchanoperatorwouldbeobligedtoadopt services.Accountantsmaybeusedtoassistinconvertingillicitfundsintolegitimate measuresasstipulatedintheBilltohelpcombatmoneylaundering. venturessuchaspurchaseofproperty,goodsandinvestmentproducts. LegalPractitionersAct,1983 PrivatisationAct,1995 IntermsoftheLegalPractitionersAct,lawyersareempoweredtosetuptrust ThePrivatisationActwasestablishedtoprovidefortheprivatisationofparastatals accountsintowhichclients’moneysaredeposited.Thedefinitionsoffinancial andfortheestablishmentoftheprivatisationunit.UnderthisAct,afterthe institutionandcashdealerasaccountableinstitutionsinthedraftMoney approvaloftheprivatisationscheme,theprivatisationunitmustidentifya LaunderingandProceedsofCrimeBill seemtohaveexcludedlawyers.The potentialpurchaser.A‘purchaser’isdefinedasanindividual,alessee,an rationaleforthisexclusionisnotquiteclear,aslawyerscanunwittinglybe investororacontractorwhoacquiresaninterestinaparastataloranyasset involvedinmoneylaunderingactivitiesintheirvariousprofessionalroles.The CentralBankisoftheopinionthattheyhavetriedtousebroadterminology whichisownedbyparastatalorinwhichaparastatalhasaninterest. whichseekstoincludeallpossibleaccountableinstitutions.However,thefact thattheBilldoesnotincludeacomprehensivelistofaccountableinstitutions Thismeansthatanybodycanbeapurchaser,especiallyastheActdoesnot isaweaknessasanumberofinstitutionsthataresusceptibletomoney haveascreeningprocessforthepotentialpurchaser. launderingareleftout. 98 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Lesotho 99

AsameansofgivingeffecttotheFinancialInstitutions(Anti-MoneyLaundering) hasshownitspoliticalcommitmenttoaddressingissuesofcorruptionand Guidelines,banksnowrequirelawyerstotransactintheirownnamesinrespect economicoffencesthroughtheestablishmentoftheDirectorate,itishoped oftrustaccountsandtodisclosethetrueidentityofapersononwhosebehalf thatthiscommitmentwillbecarriedfurtherbyprovidingthenecessaryfinancial theyundertakeatransaction,unlikepreviouslywhentheycouldtransactfully andhumanresourcestoequiptheDirectoratewiththecapacitytocarryout inclients’namesinrespectoftrustaccounts. itsduties.AstheDirectorateisdesignatedbylawasthecountry’sAnti-Money LaunderingAuthority,thisrequiresthatitbeaugmentedwithavarietyofskills Intheabsenceofaspecificprovisionrenderingthemanaccountableinstitution, suchasspecialisedinvestigativetechniques,forensicauditing,bankingpractices lawyerscanonlycomeunderscrutinyinrespectofreportablelargecashor andprosecution. suspicioustransactions.Lawyers’clients,however,enjoylessscrutiny,while alsohavingarouteintoabankaccount.Clientscanalsopayaretainertotheir Notes lawyers,whichcanbedoneinlumpsumorthroughregularorperiodic payments.Thesepaymentsmaybeingenuineanticipationoffutureincurring 1 Definitionagreedonataworkshopheldforresearcherscommissionedbythe oflegalexpenses,buttheymayalsobeusedbylaundererstohideillicitmoney. InstituteforSecurityStudies(ISS),CapeTown,8March2003. 2 GlobalProgrammeAgainstMoneyLaundering,. 3 UnitedNationsTreatyCollection,accessibleat. signatoryisnotasfastasmaybedesirable.However,asalreadypointedout, 4 SPSakoane,ResearchprojectonmoneylaunderinginSouthernAfrica:Final effortsarebeingmadetoimplementtheseobligations.TheDraftMoney reportonLesotho,unpublishedpaperpreparedfortheISS,2002. LaunderingandProceedsofCrimeBillisanattempttomeetinternational standardsonmoneylaundering.Itishowever,aweaknessthattheBillisstillin 5 UNSecurityCouncilResolution1373,2001,accessibleat. enhancinglegislativeandinstitutionalcapacitytodetectandcontrolmoney 6 AccordingtoinformationprovidedbytheLegalServicesSectionoftheMinistry launderingisafactoracknowledgedbyallrelevantrespondents.Itisalsoa ofForeignAffairs. positivesteptowardsimplementingthemandatoryobligationsofUnitedNations 7 FinancialInstitutionsAct,1999,Section2(b)(iii). SecurityCouncilResolution1373,2001aswellasotherinternational instrumentsonmoneylaunderingandthefinancingofterrorism. 8 AccordingtoinformationprovidedbytheBank’sSupervisorySection. 9 SThornhillandMHyland(MHAConsulting),Combatingmoneylaundering:A Financialinstitutionshavemadesomeprogresstowardsimplementinglegislative modelofbestpracticeforthefinancialsector,CommonwealthSecretariat,UK, andadministrativecontrolsonmoneylaunderingbutmuchmorestillhasto 2000. bedonetoensurefullcomplianceandenforcementoflaws.Evenifthebanking 10 InterviewwiththeHeadandaseniorofficerofPolicyandExchangeControl. industryiseffectiveindetectingmoneylaundering,thesecondlegofthat processhastobeenforcementofciviland/orcriminalsanctionsasdeterrents towould-belaunderersandasapunishmenttolaunderers.

ItisimperativethattheMoneyLaunderingandProceedsofCrimeBillbe passedintolawtoenabletheAnti-MoneyLaunderingAuthoritytobecome functional.TheFraudUnitlacksthecapacityandresourcestoeffectivelycombat moneylaundering.Thereisalreadyanappreciationofthefactthattheintricacies ofcriminalactivitieslikemoneylaunderingrequirespecialisedskillsfrom institutionsthataremandatedtodealwiththeproblem.Whilegovernment 100 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Malawi 101

CHAPTER5 disguisetheirillegalorigin.Thefollowingdefinitionofmoneylaunderingis adoptedinthischapter: AN EVALUATION OF INFRASTRUCTURE TO DETECT AND CONTROL MONEY LAUNDERING Allactivitiestodisguiseorconcealthenatureorsourceoforentitlement tomoneyorproperty,orrightstoeither,beingmoneyorpropertyor AND TERRORIST FUNDING IN MALAWI rightsacquiredfromseriouseconomiccrimeorcorruption,aswellas allactivitiestodisguiseorconcealmoneyorpropertythatisintended JaiBanda tobeusedincommittingorfacilitatethecommissionofseriouscrime.1

Intermsofclause19(1)ofMalawi’sproposedMoneyLaunderingandProceeds ofSeriousCrimeBill,2002,apersonlaundersmoneyifheorshe: Introduction (a) acquires,possessesorusesproperty,knowingorhavingreason tobelievethatthepropertyisderived,directlyorindirectly,from Overthecenturiesithasbeenimportantforcriminalstolegitimisetheproceeds actsoromissions: oftheircriminalactivitiesbyconvertingthefundsderivedfromcriminalactivity (i) inMalawi,whichconstituteaseriousoffence. tofundsthatappeartobelegitimatelyobtained.Preventingcriminalsfrom (ii) outsideMalawi,whichhadtheyoccurredinMalawiwould usingthefinancialinstitutionstolaundertheproceedsofcrimehastherefore haveconstitutedaseriousoffence. becomeastandardfeatureofthefightagainstcrime.Afterthetragicevents (b) directlyorindirectly,rendersassistancetoanotherpersonfor thattookplaceintheUnitedStateson11September2001anumberof (i) theconversionortransferofpropertyderived,directlyor governmentscalledforarapidandco-ordinatedefforttodetectandprevent indirectly,fromactsoromissionsreferredtoinparagraph(a) theuseoftheworldfinancialsystembyterrorists.Thiswasbasedonthegeneral withtheaimofconcealingordisguisingtheillicitoriginof recognitionthateffectiveeffortstocombatmoneylaunderingcannotbecarried thatpropertyorofaidinganypersoninvolvedinthe outwithouttheco-operationoffinancialinstitutions,theirsupervisoryauthorities commissionoftheoffencetoevadethelegalconsequences andlawenforcementagencies.Launderersarecontinuouslylookingfornew thereof. routesforlaunderingtheirfunds.EconomieslikethatofMalawi,withgrowing (ii) concealingordisguisingthetruenature,location,disposition, ordevelopingfinancialcentresbutinadequatecontrols,areparticularly movementorownershipofthepropertyderiveddirectlyor vulnerable.Thereisthereforeaneedformoneylaunderingtobefoughtin indirectlyfromactsoromissionsreferredtoinparagraph(a). Malawibyestablishingacomprehensiveanti-moneylaunderingregimeand byprovidingthenecessarylegalorregulatorytoolstotheauthoritiescharged Itisnoted frombothdefinitionsthattheprocessofdisguisingmoneyisof withcombatingtheproblem,actinginliaisonwithalltheinstitutionssusceptible criticalimportanceasitenablesthecriminaltoenjoytheprofitsofcrimewithout tomoneylaundering.ThischapterevaluatesinfrastructureinMalawitodetect givingawaythesource.Illegalarmssales,smugglingandtheactivitiesof andcontrolmoneylaundering. organisedcrime,includingarmedrobbery,drugtraffickingandprostitution, cangeneratehugesumsofmoney.Embezzlement,insidertradingandbribery Whatismoneylaundering? schemescanalsoproducelargeprofitsandcreatetheneedto‘legitimise’the ill-gottengainsthroughmoneylaundering.Whencriminalactivitygenerates substantialprofits,theindividualorgroupinvolvedmustfindawaytocontrol Takingeffectivemeasurestocombatmoneylaunderingrequiresonetohavea thefundswithoutattractingattentiontotheunderlyingactivityorthepersons goodideaofthiscrimeandhowitiscarriedout.Thegoalofalargernumber involved.Criminalsdothisbydisguisingthesourcesofthemoney,changingits ofcriminals’actsistogenerateaprofitfortheindividualorgroupthatcarries form,ormovingfundstoaplacewheretheyarelesslikelytoattractattention. outtheact.Moneylaunderingistheprocessingofthesecriminalproceedsto Bysodoing,theycommitthecrimeofmoneylaundering. 102 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Malawi 103

Exposureofcommercial,financialandothersectorsin Thesalebybanksofbearercertificatesmakesthemsusceptibletoabusefor Malawitomoneylaundering moneylaunderingpurposes.InMalawibearercertificatescanbetradedand negotiatedaftermaturityforabankchequeorcash.Moneylaundererscan TheformalretailandmercantilecommercialsectorinMalawicontinuesto usebankstodealinbearercertificates. dealmainlyincashtransactions.Mostshops,concentratedinthecommercial citiesofBlantyreandLilongwe,preferdealingincash.MalawiansofAsian Institutionalmechanismstodetectandcontrolmoney descent,whoarethebulkofretailtraders,generallydonotacceptcheques, laundering hencethewidespreaduseofcash.Thisprovidesawide-openplayingfieldfor moneylaunderers.Thegrowingtrendofrefusingpaymentbychequehas“raised InSouthAfrica,theFinancialIntelligenceCentreActNo.38of2001(FICA)is concernamongindustrycaptains,whosaythepracticefrustratesthecountry’s 2 themostdirectlegislationdealingwiththeproceedsofunlawfulactivities. effortstomovetowardsacash-freefinancialsystemifleftunattended.” For Apartfromstrictmeasuresintroducedagainstoffenders,FICAplacesonerous manyshopstheamountofcashisimmaterialtothetransaction.Aninterview obligationsonallaccountableinstitutions,includingauthorisedforeignexchange withsomeleadingmerchantsshowedthattheydonotkeepproperrecordsof dealers.MalawidoesnotyethavethelegislativeequivalentofFICA.TheMoney theirtransactions,whichheightenstheirvulnerabilitytobecomingpartofthe LaunderingBill,whichhastwicebeentabledinparliament,hasnotbeenpassed moneylaunderingchain.Itiswidelyknownthatcriminalscanusecashfrom onaccountofbeinginsufficientlyexplained:legislatorshavecomplainedthat thesaleofdrugs,armedrobberyoranyotherillicittradetopurchaseitems theydonotunderstandit.TheAttorney-GeneralindicatedthattheBillwould fromretailoutlets. betabledagainbeforetheend2003,3butthishadnotyetoccurredatthetime ofwriting. ThereareafewmotorvehicledealersinMalawi.Aswithotherpartsofthe commercialsector,peoplecanbuyvehiclesusingcash.Further,thedealersdo TheMoneyLaunderingBillreferstofinancialinstitutionsorcashdealers. notrequireanyformofproofofidentityfrompurchasers,nordotheyverify ‘Financialinstitution’coversawiderangeofbusinessactivities.Inthischapter purchasers’identity.Anyonecanbuyavehiclebymerelystatinghisnameand thefollowinginstitutionsareexamined:boardsofexecutors,trustcompanies, address,uponwhichthesellercangivethepurchaseraletterofchangeof travelagents,estateagents,police,banks,gamblingestablishments,lawyers, ownership.ThisisthensubmittedtotheRoadTrafficAuthoritytoeffectthe forexbureaux,accountantsandinvestmentpromotionagencies.Mostofthem changeofownershipintothepurchaser’sname.Thispracticeexposesthe wouldfallundertheproposeddefinitionoffinancialinstitutions. motorvehicletradetothelaunderingoftaintedmoney. Themechanismsinplacetodetectandcontrolmoneylaunderinginthese Foreignexchangebureauxarehighlyexposedtomoneylaundering.An institutionsarevaried.SincemoneylaunderingisnotyetacrimeinMalawi,it observationofthewaytransactionsarecarriedoutinonesuchbureaurevealed isstillamatterofspeculationwhetherthesemechanismsareinfactintended thatinsomeinstances,norecordoftransactionsisenteredinanybooks.Itisat todetectandcontrolmoneylaundering,orwhethertheyareprimarilyaimed thediscretionofthecustomerwhetherthetransactionsshouldberecordedor atsomeotherpurpose. whetherhispassportshouldbestampedtoindicatethetransaction.Thisexposes thebureauxtomoneylaundering.Furthermore,thebureauxarenotobliged toreportanycashtransactionstothepolice,regardlessoftheamountsinvolved. Bankinginstitutions

TheFiscalPolice,withheadquartersinBlantyre,isthepoliceunitthatdeals Inmanycases,banksandotherfinancialinstitutionsmaybetheonlyentitiescapable witheconomiccrimes.Theunithas10members.Itisnotclearwhatmeasures, oftracingtheassetsoflaunderersandterroristsandofpreventingthemfrombeing ifany,ithasputinplacetodetectandcontrolmoneylaundering.Theconcept usedtofinanceterrorismortheothercriminalactivities.Accordingly,itisimportant ofmoneylaunderingseemsstilltobeonlyvaguelyappreciatedwithinthe thatmechanismstobeputinplacetodetectmoneylaunderingbytheseinstitutions. unit,whichclearlycompromisestheunit’scapacity. TheReserveBankplaysanimportantroleinthisregard. 104 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Malawi 105

TheReserveBankofMalawi Commercialbanks TheReserveBankofMalawiisestablishedundertheReserveBankAct1964, TherearesixcommercialbanksinMalawi,namelyNationalBank,StanbicBank, Chapter44:02anditsprincipalobjectivesincludethe: FinanceBank,FirstMerchantBank,LoitaBankandIndebank.Theirmeasuresto detectandcontrolthelaunderingoftaintedmoneyaremoreorlessthesame.At • promotionofasoundfinancialstructureinMalawi,includingpayment thebiggestbank,NationalBank,thefollowingmechanismsareused: systems,clearingsystemsandadequatefinancialservicesabletodetect andcontrolmoneylaundering; Openingofaccounts Customeridentificationisessentialbeforeanyaccountisopened. 5Thebank • collectionofeconomicdatafromthefinancialandothersectorsforresearch takesreasonablemeasurestosatisfyitselfastothetrueidentityofanyone andpolicypurposes.Theresearchassistsinbringingnew,counter-money seekingtoenterintoabusinessrelationshipwithitbyrequiringtheapplicant launderingperspectivestorespondtoeverchangingmethodsofmoney toproduceanofficialrecordreasonablycapableofestablishinghisorhertrue laundering. identity,suchasapassport,driver’slicence,aletterfromemployerswithproof • supervisionofbanksandotherfinancialinstitutionstoensuretheiractivities ofremuneration,orreferencesfromaccountholders.InthepasttheNational arecarriedoutlawfullywiththeReserveBankprovidingthenecessarychecks Banktooksuchreferencesatfacevaluebutnowithastoverifythem. andbalancesonmoneylaundering. Thebankgenerallydoesnotestablishabankingrelationshipuntiltheidentity SupervisionofbanksandotherfinancialinstitutionsisintermsofSection48 ofanewcustomerisverified.Withregardtocompaniesortrusteeshipsthe (i),whichstipulatesthat: banknotonlyrequiresthecertificatesofincorporationbutalsochecksonthe identityofthedirectors.Thesameappliestotrusteeshipsofanycharitable TheBankshallsupervisebanksandotherfinancialinstitutionsto organisation. safeguardtheliquidityandsolvencyofsuchinstitutionsandensure theircompliancewiththemonetaryregulationsundertheAct.4 StanbicBankhasmoreorlessthesamerequirementsforopeninganaccount astheNationalBank.Theoperationsmanagerindicatedthatthebank TheReserveBankhasthepowertocalluponcommercialbanksandother endeavourstogetasmuchinformationaspossiblefromclientswhenthey financialinstitutionstosubmitfinancialandotherstatementsregardingtheir openaccounts.Stanbichasnowgonefurtherandiscurrentlyworkingon businessandanyadditionalinformationtheBankmayrequire.Thisallowsit requiringcustomerstogetauthenticatedlettersofrecommendationfromnotary toevaluatethecommercialbanks’activitiesanddetermineifthereareany publicsbeforethebankwillopenanaccountforthem.Astherearenonational suspiciousactivitiestakingplace. identitycardsinMalawi,StanbicBanksometimesacceptspersonalidentity cardsforindividuals. Withregardtotheliquidityandsolvencyandsoundmanagementofbanks andotherfinancialinstitutions,theReserveBankissuesguidelines,regulations However,thebanksdonotverifytheauthenticityofsomeofthedocuments anddirectives.Eachbankorfinancialinstitutionisrequiredtocomplywith regularlyreliedonforidentification,suchaspassportsanddriver’slicences, themorriskcertainpenalties. withtherelevantinstitutions,namelytheImmigrationDepartmentandRoad TrafficDepartmentrespectively.TheImmigrationDepartmenthasbeenknown Inadditiontosettingoutthebasicelementsforbankstofollow,theBankalso toissuepassportstonon-Malawians,particularlyZimbabweans. monitorstheapplicationbythecommercialbanksofsound‘knowyour customer’procedures. Recordkeeping TheNationalBankofMalawihasanarchivingsystemthatisusedinkeeping TheReserveBank’sinspectorscaninvestigatetheaffairsofanybankorfinancial recordsforthebankandabookletthatdefineswhattheymeanby‘records’. institutionsatanytime. ThestatutoryrequirementforkeepingrecordsinMalawiissevenyearsbutthe NationalBankmaykeepkeydocumentsforaslongas20years.StanbicBank 106 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Malawi 107 keepsrecordsforsevenyears,afterwhichtheyarestoredinadatabank.The ThebanksinMalawidonotallowanonymousbankaccounts.Eachaccountis recordsareneverdestroyed.Thebanksrevealedthatallrecordsrelatingto assignedtoanexistingperson.However,aspointedoutabove,bankssuchas transactionsarekepttoenablethemtocomplyswiftlywithinformationrequests thefirstMerchantBankandFinanceBankthatsellbearercertificatesdonot fromtheReserveBankofMalawi.Therecordsaresufficienttopermit requireidentitiesforanyonepurchasingthem.Thispracticeisaloopholewhich reconstructionofindividualtransactions. canbeusedbycriminalstodisguisetheirtaintedmoney.

Reportingsystem Othercommercialinstitutions BanksinMalawiarenotobligedbylawtoreportregulartransactionsandthey areinvariablynotkeentodoso.Thetendencyistoupholdsecrecypractices. Estateagents NationalBank’sapproachistodiscussanypotentiallyproblematicmatterwith acustomerbeforereportingittolawenforcementofficers.Withinthebank MostestateagentsinMalawidonotunderstandwhatmoneylaunderingis anyofficerwhoisconfrontedwithasuspicioustransactionreportstoquality aboutandthushavenotputinplacemechanismstocontrolanddetectit.The assuranceofficers,whohavetheresponsibilityofco-ordinatingunusual estateagentsregarditasnothingunusualifapersonbringsinamillionkwacha transactionsarisinginthebank.Theyreferthemattertothebank’sRiskand incashtopurchaseaproperty.Theydonotevenprofiletheircustomers.Most SecurityDepartment,whichismandatedtoinvestigateandchecksuch estateagentscarryingonbusinessinMalawiarenotregisteredwiththeEstate transactions. AgentsBoard.

AtStanbicBankanybankofficialconfrontedwithanunusualtransactionrefers Itisdifficultforestateagentstodetectthelaunderingoftaintedmoney.Most themattertotheinternalauditor,whointurnrefersittotheOperationsand aresimplyinterestedinsellingproperties,regardlessofthesourceoffunds. Administrationbranchofthebank.Inrespectofothernewbanks,suchasFirst Theyarenotrequiredbylawtoquestionaclient’ssourceoffundsortoverify MerchantandFinanceBank,reportsaremadetothemanagerofthebank. theidentityofanyindividual,hencetheircapacitytodetectlaunderedproceeds isnexttozero. Nobanksallowtheoperationofanonymousbankaccounts. Lawyers Screeningofemployees Itisimportantforbankstoscreenemployeeslesttheyemployindividualswho Fivelawfirmssurveyedhadnomeasurestodetectandcontrolthelaundering thenconnivewiththelaunderers.Screeningofpotentialnewemployeestakes oftaintedmoney.Noprofilingoridentityverificationofclientswasundertaken. placethroughinterviewsandbywritingtothepreviousemployersorformer Thereisnodoubtthatlawyersarewellpositionedtoacquireinformationrelating educationinstitutionsforreferences. tomoneylaunderingandeventofacilitateit.However,becauseofclient confidentiality,lawyerscannoteffectivelydischargetheirresponsibilitiesinthe Stafftraining detectionofmoneylaundering.InMalawilawyersarenotobligedtomake ThoughmostbankemployeesofNationalBankandStanbicBankreceive anyreports,hencetheircapacitytodetectmoneylaunderingistonoavail. trainingeachyearinthebanks’generaloperation,notmuchtimehasbeen devotedtospecialisedtrainingonmoneylaunderingoritsdetection.Proper Insuranceorganisations trainingisrequirediflaunderingistobedetected.Bankofficialscanonlydetect launderingiftheyhaveknowledgeofwhatitentails. TheinsurersinMalawihavealsonotputinplaceanymeasurestocontrolor detectmoneylaundering.Interviewswithofficials6frominsurancecompanies Cashtransactions revealedthattheyweregenerallyunfamiliarwiththeconceptofmoney ThefinancialsectorinMalawidealspredominantlyincashtransactions.Thebanks laundering.Theinsurancecompaniesdidnotcaretoprobethesourceof thusrarelyreportanycashtransactions,althoughNationalBanksaidthatsuspicions incomeoftheircustomersorverifywithforeignjurisdictionswhetherornot arearousedinthecaseofcashdepositsofamillionkwachaormore. motorvehiclesbeinginsuredwerestolen. 108 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Malawi 109

Thecapacitytodetectmoneylaunderingismademoredifficultforinsurance CustomsofficialsatthebordersarerequiredtoinspectallgoodsenteringMalawi companiesincaseswheretheyhavetopayoutforaccidents,someofwhich anddeterminethedutypayable.However,theyfinditverytoughtodetect arenotgenuine.Sometimesdriversofcompanyvehiclesconnivewith whetherinvoicesforsuchgoodsaregenuineornot.Attemptshavebeenput unscrupulousindividualsandstageaccidents,forinsurersarerequiredtopay. inplacetouseorganisationssuchasthe’SocietyGeneraleDesuiveillance(SGS) Theinsurancecompaniesdonothavethecapacitytodealwithsuchsituations, todeterminethecorrectpricesofgoods,butitisstillverydifficulttodetermine whichnonethelessprovideanopportunityformoneylaundering. theirtruevalues.Sometimesmoneyislaunderedthroughunder-invoicingin respectofcross-bordertrade. Gamblinginstitutions GamblinginstitutionsareanewphenomenoninMalawiandhaveonlybeen Ascriminalscanpurchasevolumesofcommoditiesusingcashandwithnoreceipts inthecountrysince2002.Blantyrehasonecasino.Therearenomechanisms beingissued,itisverydifficulttodetectthelaunderingoftaintedmoney. todetectandcontrolthepossiblelaunderingoftaintedmoneyandotherillicit proceedsthroughthecasino.Gamblerscanvisitthecasinowithmillionsin Evenifgoodsmanagetoslipthoughtheborder,theMalawiRevenueAuthority cashwithoutanyoneraisinganeyebrow.Moneylaundererscanthus‘clean’as hasroadblocksinplacealongtheroadsleadingtothemajortowns,suchas muchmoneyastheywantthroughthecasinowithoutanyfearofdetection. Blantyre,LilongweandMzuzu,toinspectgoodsthatpassthroughthem. Casinosarenotrequiredtogettheidentityoftheircustomersorquestionthe sourceofcustomers’funds. TaxevasionisrampantinMalawi.TheMalawiRevenueAuthoritycan,however, visitanyinstitutionandinspectthebookstodetermineifthereareanyillegal Governmentdepartmentsandinstitutions activitiestakingplace.

Registrarofbusinesses,trustsandcompanies InregardtopurchaseandsaleofpropertiesinMalawi,nopropertycanbe Moneylaundererscanregisterfirms,companiesortrustsandusethesameto transferredunlessthesellercanproduceataxcertificatethathehasbeen disguisetheirclandestineactivities. payingtaxandsuchtaxcertificatesareonlyissuedbytheMalawiRevenue Authority. Theclerkwhoprocessesregistrationoftheseentitiesindicatedignoranceof theterm‘moneylaundering’andwasnotawarethatentitiescanberegistered TheImmigrationDepartment forillicitpurposes.Theonlymechanismwhichcanbesaidtobeinplaceto ForAfricancountriesnovisasarerequiredtoenterMalawi,makingitdifficult controlmoneylaunderingistherequirementofsomeofthosewhoregister fortheImmigrationDepartmenttocontrolandinvestigatesuchvisitorstothe businessnamestofurnishtheiridentities,copiesofwhicharekeptinthe country.However,theImmigrationDepartmenthasintensifiedscrutinyofall respectivefilesoftheregisteredentity.Inregardtotheregistrationofcompanies thoseenteringMalawifromoutsidethecontinent,andmonitorsthemovement ortrusts,notrustees’ordirectors’identitydocumentsarerequiredwhatsoever. ofallthosesuspectedtohaveterroristinclinations,withtheassistanceofthe NationalIntelligenceBureau. MalawiRevenueAuthorityandDepartmentofCustomsandExcise TheMalawiRevenueAuthorityisthegovernmentdepartmentempoweredto Thepolice collectrevenueinMalawi.Thedepartmentismoreinterestedincollecting Thecapacityofthepolicetodetectmoneylaunderingisdiminishedbecause revenuethanitisinmechanismstodetectorcontrolmoneylaundering.It mostdonotunderstandwhatitentails.IninterviewswiththeFiscalPolice,the findsitdifficulttodeterminewhetherthecorrecttaxisbeingcollectedsince branchthatismeanttodealwithlaundering,onlytwooutofeightpolicemen mosttradersdonotissuereceipts. interviewedhadanyideaofwhatmoneylaunderingisallabout.7Forthepolice tobeabletoeffectivelydischargetheirdutiestheyfirstrequiretraining. Themainmechanismtodetectandcontrolmoneylaunderingisinactionat thecountry’sborders,throughtheDepartmentofCustomsandExcise,though Theircapacitytodetectmoneylaunderingisfurtherlimitedbecausetheyare itschiefaimisinfacttocollectdutiespayableongoodsenteringMalawi. notallowedbylawtotaptelephoneswheninvestigatingmatters,thoughthey 110 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Malawi 111 diddothisduringtheone-partydictatorshipofKamuzuBandainanattempt responsibilitiesisverylimitedsincethegovernmenthasnotyetestablisheda toclampdownonpoliticalopponents. comprehensivesetofbenchmarks.

MalawiInvestmentPromotionAgency Moneylaunderers’toolsrangefromcomplexfinancialtransactionscarriedout ThemainfunctionoftheMalawiInvestmentPromotionAgencyistoencourage throughwebsofwiretransfersandnetworksofshellcompanies,tocurrency investmentinMalawi.Theorganisationhasnomechanismstocheckthesources smuggling,under-andover-invoicingandtaxevasion. offinanceforinvestmentprojects,ortodetectorcontrolthelaunderingof taintedmoneythroughsuchprojects. Oneofthemajorobstaclestothesuccessfulfightagainstmoneylaunderingis thatmanyinstitutionsstilldonotunderstandtheconcept.Thestaffofrelevant Forexbureaux institutionsdonothavethenecessaryskillstodeterminewhenmoney Forexbureauxarevulnerableandsusceptibletoabusebymoneylaunderers. launderingistakingplaceandthustheircapacitytoimplementcountermeasures Individuals,bothforeignandnational,canundertakelargetransactionsasthere islimited.Justasbanksandotherfinancialinstitutionshavetoidentifytheir isnolimitontheamountsthatcanbetransactedinthebureaux.Itisthus clients,theyarealsocalledupontodeveloptheabilitytoknowwhetheridentity surprisingthattheyhavenotputinplaceanymechanismstodetectorcontrol documentsarerealorfake.Thecapacitytodothisisnarrow. moneylaundering.Theforexbureauxdonothavethecapacitytodetectfake passportssoanyone,includingforeigners,canexchangemoneybyproducing Thebanksfurtherhaveanenormoustaskiftheyarereallytogettoknowa anypassport.Inthiswaytheproceedsofcrimecanbeeasilytransferredto customerwithanumberofdifferentbusinesses.Thecapacitytoprofilenot othercountries.Itshouldbenotedthatindividualscanalsobuyforex,evenif justthecustomer,buthisfamilydependantsandbeneficiaries,isanonerous theyarenottravelling,unlikethesituationinbankswhereproductionofabus onetoprocureandthecostofprofilingcustomersextensivelyiscostlyfor orairlineticketisrequiredbeforetheissueoftravellers’chequesandbanks Malawianinstitutions. donotsellforeignexchangejusttoanybodybutonlytoestablishedcustomers. Someinstitutions,suchastheRegistrarofCompanies,havepoorrecord Limitationsoninstitutions’capacitytodetectmoney maintenancepractices,withtheresultthatfilescaneasilygomissing.Thereis laundering alsoanabsenceofrecordsinthefilesofsomebusinessentities.Notableisthe lackoffilingofannualreturns.Itisthereforedifficulttodetermineifabusiness Sincemoneylaunderingtouchesdifferentsectors,amulti-disciplinaryapproach entitywasestablishedforlegalpurposesorforthepurposesoflaundering isrequiredtodetectit.Onpaperthepolice,theMalawiRevenueAuthority, proceedsandcarryingoutillicitactivities. theNationalIntelligenceBureau,theAnti-CorruptionBureauandtheDirector Theabsenceofcompanyrecordsmakesitdifficulttocollect,evaluate,process ofPublicProsecutionsarerequiredtoworktogether.However,itisnoted andinvestigatefinancialinformationrelatingtofinancialandbusinesstransactions. theseinstitutionsdonotappearpreparedtodoso.Therehavebeencasesthat havebeeninvestigatedbytheAnti-CorruptionBureaubutwhichtheDirector TheRegistrarofCompanies,likemostgovernmentagencies,stillusesoutdated ofPublicProsecutionshasinexplicablydeclinedtoprosecute. formsofstorageanalysisandcommunicationofinformation. Theseinstitutionsarereluctanttoshareinformationasaresultoflackoftrust Formal,structuredco-operationisclearlylackingbetweenfinancialinstitutions betweenthem.Thereistheusualfearthatinformationcouldbeleakedtowrong andgovernmentdepartments.Ifmoneylaunderingistobedetected,thenamulti- persons.TheAnti-CorruptionBureauandtheDirectorofPublicProsecutions,and disciplinedapproachbetweengovernmentagenciesandfinancialinstitutionsis theNationalIntelligenceBureauandthepolice,regardthemselvesasrivalsand desirable,butthecapacitytocarryoutthisapproachishinderedbecause: thisresultsinaweaknessinthecontrolofmoneylaundering. • anunwillingnesstoshareinformationiscommonamonggovernment Thecapacityoftheinstitutionsthatarerequiredtodetectthelaunderingof agenciesandisusuallytheresultoflackofmutualtrustwhichgivesriseto taintedmoneyandotherillicitproceedstoeffectivelydischargetheir fearofpossibleleakageofsensitivematerialtounauthorisedpersons; 112 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Malawi 113

• thereisareluctanceonthepartofthefinancialinstitutionstoprovide TheReserveBankisabletodeterminethatbankshaveadequatepolicies, governmentauthoritieswithinformationthatmightberelatedto,butisnot practicesandproceduresinplacethatpromotehighethicalandprofessional patentlyindicativeof,crime.Thefinancialinstitutionsarewaryofbeing standards.Shouldanybanknotcomplywiththese,theReserveBankcan,in calledaswitnessesincourtproceedingsandwouldprefertodowhatthey theory,revokethebank’slicence,althoughinpracticethishasneverhappened. cantoavoidgoingtocourt; TheReserveBankcanalsoreportanycriminalactivitydetectedtothefiscal police. • therearedifferencesinthelevelsoftechnologybeingappliedbytherelevant institutionsandintheskillslevelsoftheirpersonnel.Thisoftenactsasa Inrespectofdocumentationandpoliciesofidentificationofcustomers,the barriertoeffectiveandefficientinformationexchange;and ReserveBankhasthecapacitytocheckonthesebyvisitingthebanksand requestingthedocumentsatanytime. • resourcelimitationslimitthecapacityofgovernmentagenciestoeffectively exchangeinformationamongthemselvesandwithprivatefinancial TheReserveBankcanfurtherdirectanyfinancialinstitutiontodirecthowany institutions,suchasbanks,whichhaveattheirdisposalcomparatively bankofficialcanoperate,evenamoneylaunderingofficer. sophisticatedinformationtechnologysystems. TheReserveBank’scapacitytoenforcecivil/criminallegislationiscumbersome Capacityofinstitutionstosupervisetheimplementationof asithastopassthroughtheLawReformCommissionandtheMinistryof moneylaunderingcontrol Justice.Althoughthiscanbedone,ittakestime.

Theregulationofprimarymoneylaunderingcontrolpointsbytheirmother TheLawSociety institutionsisdonewithfullknowledgethatthereisnolegislationonmoney launderinginMalawi.Hence,thesupervisionisgeneralandnotspecifically TheLawSocietywasestablishedunderSection25oftheLegalEducationand relativetocounteringmoneylaunderingasadistinctcrime.Thissectiondiscusses LegalPractitionersActChapter3:04andhasthepowertomakerulesdealing therelevantinstitutionsandtheircapabilities.Thereisnodutyonthesupervisory withstandardsofprofessionalconductwithwhicheverylegalpractitioneris authoritiestodiscloseorcausetobedisclosedtoanybodyanyinformation requiredtocomply.8 thatapersonmaybeengagedinmoneylaundering. AnattemptwasmadebytheLawSocietytoestablishacommitteetoinspect TheReserveBank thebooksofanyfirmoflegalpractitionersatanytime.However,theproposal todosowasrejectedbytheLawSociety’smembers. AsnotedoneoftheprincipalobjectivesoftheReserveBankofMalawiisto Despitehavingthepower,onpaper,todealwithprofessionalmisconduct,itis superviseotherbanks.TheReserveBankhasthecapacity,andisempowered, difficultfortheLawSocietytoenforceadministrativemeasures. toappointinspectorswhomayatanytimeinvestigatetheaffairsofanybank orotherfinancialinstitutionsatsuchinstitution’spremises.Anattempttodiscuss ItshouldfurtherbenoteditwouldbedifficultfortheLawSocietytosupervise theReserveBank’ssupervisorycapacitywasrefusedbythebank’slawyers. lawyerssincetheexecutivemembersoftheLawSocietyarealsopractising lawyerswhohavetheinterestsoftheirownfirmsatheart. ThebigbanksthemselvesbelievethattheReserveBankofficersaremore interestedinprotectingbankclientsthanincheckingifanymoneylaundering Withnospecificlegislationonmoneylaunderingitisdifficulttoevaluatethe activitiesaretakingplace.Further,theReserveBankofficersdonotjustarrive capacityoftheLawSocietytoregulateorsuperviselawyers. atabanktoinvestigateitbutonlydosoafterpriorarrangement,thusdiminishing theirownmoneylaunderingdetectioncapacitybygivingthebanksample TheLawSocietyhasthecapacitytoenforcemutuallegalassistance,despite timetoputtheirhousesinorderbeforebeinginvestigated. thepresentlegislationthatonlycoversZimbabweandZambia. 9Inregardto 114 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Malawi 115 theforfeitureofproperty,itcanenforcethisthroughthecourts.Suchforfeiture (b) Freezewithoutdelayfundsandotherfinancialassetsoreconomic isconditionalonconviction.10 resourcesofpersonswhocommit,orattempttocommit,terrorist actsorparticipateinorfacilitatethecommissionofterroristacts; SocietyofAccountants ofentitiesownedorcontrolleddirectlyorindirectlybysuch persons;andofpersonsandentitiesactingonbehalfof,oratthe ThemissionoftheSocietyofAccountantsistoproduceproperlytrained directionsofsuchpersonsandentities,includingfundsderived accountants.TheSociety’sSecretaryindicatedthatitis,inpractice,difficultto orgeneratedfrompropertyownedorcontrolleddirectlyor reallycheckorsupervisehowaccountantscarryouttheirduties.Nordoesthe indirectlybysuchpersonsandassociatedpersonsandentities; Societyhavethecapacitytoenforceadministrativemeasuresinrelationto (c) Prohibittheirnationalsoranypersonsandentitieswithintheir mutuallegalassistance,orthefreezingandforfeitureofproceedsofcrime. territoriesfrommakinganyfunds,financialassetsoreconomic resourcesorfinancialorotherrelatedservicesavailable,directly TheAnti-CorruptionBureau orindirectly,forthebenefitofpersonswhocommitorattemptto commitorfacilitateorparticipateinthecommissionofterrorist TheAnti-CorruptionBureauhasthecapacitytoseizeorfreezeanyproperty acts,ofentitiesownedorcontrolled,directlyorindirectly,by whichisthesubjectofaninvestigationoraprosecutioninrelationtoany suchpersonsandofpersonsandentitiesactiononbehalfoforat 11 offenceallegedorsuspectedtohavebeencommittedundertheAct. Thisis thedirectionofsuchperson; donewiththeassistanceofthepolice.However,surveillancelawscannotbe enforcedandtheAnti-CorruptionBureaucannotputmeasuresinplacesince ...2. thelawshavenotbeenenacted. (a) Refrainfromprovidinganyformofsupport,activeorpassive,to entitiesorpersonsinvolvedinterroristacts,includingby TheAnti-CorruptionBureaualsoneedstotrainitsstafftounderstandthewhole suppressingrecruitmentofmembersofterroristgroupsand conceptofmoneylaundering. eliminatingthesupplyofweaponstoterrorists; (b) Takethenecessarystepstopreventthecommissionofterrorist ImplicationsofSecurityCouncilResolution1373 acts,includingbyprovisionofearlywarningtootherStatesby exchangeofinformation; TheUnitedNations(UN)SecurityCouncilResolution1373wastakenafter (c) Denysafehaventothosewhofinance,plan,support,orcommit theterroristattacksof11September2001.Amongotherthings,theResolution terroristacts,orprovidesafehavens; calledonstatestoworktogetherurgentlytopreventandsuppressterrorist (d) Preventthosewhofinance,plan,facilitateorcommitterrorist acts,includingthroughincreasedco-operationandfullimplementationofthe actsfromusingtheirrespectiveterritoriesforthosepurposes relevantinternationalconventionsrelatingtoterrorism. againstotherstatesortheircitizens; (e) Ensurethatanypersonwhoparticipatesinthefinancing,planning, TheSecurityCouncil,actingunderchapterVIIIoftheCharteroftheUN,took preparationorperpetrationofterroristactsorinsupportingterrorist somemandatorydecisionsinrespectofallnations,whichareworthrepeating actsisbroughttojusticeandensurethat,inadditiontoanyother hereinsomedetail.Itwasdecidedthatallnationsshall: measuresagainstthem,suchterroristactsareestablishedasserious criminaloffencesindomesticlawsandregulationsandthatthe Preventandsuppressthefinancingofterroristacts; punishmentdulyreflecttheseriousnessofsuchterroristacts; (a) Criminalisethewillfulprovisionorcollection,byanymeans, (f) Affordoneanotherthegreatestmeasureofassistancein directlyorindirectly,offundsbytheirnationalsorintheir connectionwithcriminalinvestigationsorcriminalproceedings territorieswiththeintentionthatthefundsshouldbeused,orin relatingtothefinancingorsupportofterroristacts,including theknowledgethattheyaretobeused,inordertocarryout assistanceinobtainingevidenceintheirpossessionnecessaryfor terroristacts; theproceedings; 116 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Malawi 117

(g) Preventthemovementofterroristsorterroristgroupsbyeffective Thefirstdecisiontakenisinrespectofthepreventionandsuppressionofthe bordercontrolsandcontrolsonissuanceofidentitypapersand financingofterroristacts.Forterroriststoacttheyrequirefundingandfunding traveldocuments,andthroughmeasuresforpreventing inturnrequireslaunderingfacilities.Nolegislationhasbeenputinplacein counterfeiting,forgeryorfraudulentuseofidentitypapersand Malawitopreventandsuppressthefinancingofterroristactsandnorhasthe traveldocuments.12 willfulprovisionorcollectionoffundsbyMalawianswiththeintentionthatthe fundsshouldbeusedinordertocarryoutterroristactsbeencriminalised.The Inaddition,stateswerealsocalleduponto: MoneyLaunderingBillstillremainstobepromulgatedintoLaw. (a) Findwaysofintensifyingandacceleratingtheexchangeof operationalinformation,especiallyregardingactionsor Inregardtofreezingoffunds,undertheCorruptPracticesActNo.18the movementsofterroristpersonsornetworks;forgedorfalsified Ministermaymakeregulationsforthedisposalofrecoveredgratificationunder traveldocuments;trafficinarms,explosivesorsensitivematerials; theAct.IntermsofRegulation3oftheCorruptPractices(DisposalofRecovered useofcommunicationstechnologiesbyterroristgroups;andthe SeizedorFrozenProperty)Regulations,anyrecovered,seizedorfrozenproperty threatposedbythepossessionofweaponsofmassdestruction whichcomesintothepossessionoftheAnti-CorruptionBureaushallvestin byterroristgroups; thestateifitcannotbereturnedtotherightfulowner.Thereisnoother (b) Exchangeinformationinaccordancewithinternationaland legislationwhichprovidesforthefreezingoffunds,financialassetsoreconomic domesticlawandco-operateonadministrativeandjudicial resourcesofpersonswhocommitorparticipateinthecommissionofterrorist matterstopreventthecommissionofterroristacts; acts.Theactreferredtoaboveisonlyinrespectofcorruption.Malawians’ (c) Co-operate,particularlythroughbilateralandmultilateral makingoffundsandotherresourcesavailableforthebenefitofterroristsis arrangementsandagreements,topreventandsuppressterrorist alsonotcriminalised. attacksandtakeactionagainstperpetratorsofsuchacts; (d) Becomepartiesassoonaspossibletotherelevantinternational NolegislationhasbeenputinplacetocomplementtheUNdecisionthatall conventionsandprotocolsrelatingtoterrorism,includingthe stateswouldrefrainfromprovidinganyformofsupport,activeorpassive,to InternationalConventionfortheSuppressionoftheFinancingof entitiesorpersonsinvolvedinterroristsactsincludingbysuppressingrecruitment Terrorismof9thDecember1999; ofmembersofterroristgroupsandeliminatingthesupplyofweaponsto (e) Increaseco-operationandfullyimplementtherelevant terrorists. internationalconventionsandprotocolsrelatingtoterrorismand SecurityCouncilresolutions1269(1999)and1368(2001); Inregardtotheprovisionsinrespectofmutuallegalassistance,thereareno (f) Takeappropriatemeasuresinconformitywiththerelevant provisionsofwarningtoothercountriesbyexchangeofinformation.Resolution provisionsofnationalandinternationallaw,includinginternational 1373alsodecidedthatterroristactsbeestablishedasseriouscriminaloffences standardsofhumanrights,beforegrantingrefugeestatus,forthe butthishasnotbeenincorporatedintoMalawi’sdomesticlawsandregulations. purposeofensuringthattheasylum-seekerhasnotplanned, facilitatedorparticipatedinthecommissionofterroristacts; AlthoughthereisnolegislationcompellingMalawitoassistanotherstatein (g) Ensure,inconformitywithinternationallaw,thatrefugeestatus connectionwithcriminalinvestigationsortoprovideassistanceinobtaining isnotabusedbytheperpetrators,organisersorfacilitatorsof evidencerelatingtofinancingorsupportofterroristacts,thepolicedoassist terroristacts,andthatclaimsofpoliticalmotivationarenot eachotherinpracticethroughtheSouthernAfricanRegionalPoliceChiefs’ recognisedasgroundsforrefusingrequestsfortheextraditionof Co-operationOrganisation(SARPCCO). allegedterrorists.13 Inregardtobordercontrols,thoughnovisasarerequiredfromanycountryin WenowturntoanexaminationofwhetherthedecisionstakeninthisResolution Africaandthereisnolegislationinrespectofnationalidentitycards,trafficin havebeenimplementedinMalawithroughdomesticlegislation. armsiscontrolledthroughtheFirearmsAct. 118 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica Malawi 119

Allinall,thedecisionstakeninResolution1373havenotbeenenactedinto (h) supportingtheNationalIntelligenceBureauanditsintelligenceactivities domesticlegislation.Thelegislationthatisinplaceisnotadequateasitdoes enhancedaimedtoexposeterroristgroupsandthwarttheirdesigns. notspecificallyrefertoterrorism. WiththesemeasuresinplacetherequirementsofResolution1373wouldbe met. RecommendationstomeettherequirementsofResolution1373

Malawineedstoenactthenecessarylegislationtoestablishterrorismasa Conclusion criminaloffenceandshouldincorporateallaspectsofResolution1373intoits domesticlaw.TheBillonmoneylaundering,whichhastwicefailedtopass IfmoneylaunderingistobedetectedandcontrolledinMalawi,thecountry’s throughparliament,shouldquicklybemadeintolaw.Malawishouldfurther infrastructurehastobedevelopedasatthemomentitishaphazard.Thefirst ratifyandimplementtheremainingconventionsandprotocolsrelatingto stepswouldbetoenacttheproposedMoneyLaunderingBillintolawandput terrorism.Theinstitutionalmeasuresshouldincludethepreventionof inplacelegislativeandinstitutionalframeworksspellingoutthemeasuresthat recruitmenttoterroristgroups,movementofterrorists,establishmentofterrorist institutionsmustadopttodetectandcontrolmoneylaundering. safehavensand/oranyotherformsofpassiveoractivesupportforterroristsor terroristgroups.Institutionalmeasuresshouldalsoinclude: InstitutionsinMalawishouldberequiredtobuildacomprehensivesystem thatcansupportaneffective,multi-disciplinedapproachforcombatingmoney (a) policeandintelligencestructurestodetect,monitorandapprehendthose laundering.Malawishouldfurtherestablishcentralisedstructurestofollowup involvedinterroristactivitiesandthosesupportingterroristactivities.This anyreportedsuspicioustransactions.Malawineedstocreateanintelligence meanstheMalawiPoliceandNationalIntelligenceBureaushouldwork unitforthepurposeofreceivingandanalysingsuspicioustransactions.This handinhand; institutionshouldbeautonomousandhaveadequateresourcestobeableto function. (b) improvingthecapacityofpolice,customs,borderguards,themilitaryand thejudiciarythroughtheprovisionoftrainingforofficials; Thepolicemustprioritiseeconomiccrimeinordertofightmoneylaundering, (c) establishingexchangeprogrammeswithcounter-terrorismoperativesand withoutbeinghamperedbypoliticalpressure.Theneedfortrainingtoequip officialsfromwithintheSADCregionandotherregions; themtodealwithcomplexmoneylaunderingschemescannotbe overemphasised.Traininghastobeextendedtootherinstitutionsand (d) establishingadatabaseandcommunicationsystemsformonitoringand governmentdepartments. controllingthemovementofterroristweapons,suchasfirearms;

(e) establishinginter-agencyworkinggroupsinvolvingpolice,military,customs, Notes homeaffairsandotheragenciestoimprovepolicyco-ordination,information 1 ThisdefinitionwasagreedtobycommissionedresearchersatanISSworkshop sharingandanalysisatthenationallevelregardingexplosives,firearmsand oncombatingmoneylaunderingintheSADCregion,heldatHolidayInn ammunition; Arcadia,Pretoriaon19thJanuary2002(seepage2). (f) developingsurveillanceproceduresbythepolice,army,immigrationand 2 NationNewspaper,25April2002. theNationalIntelligenceBureautosecurethecountry’sbordersagainst 3 TheDailyTimes,4November2002. infiltration; 4 ReserveBankAct,Section48(i),1964. (g) creatingsystemsbythepolice,armyandNationalIntelligenceBureauto 5 UnderSection49oftheBankingActanydirector,manager,officeror protectvitalinstallationsandthesafetyofdiplomaticandconsularpersons employeeofabankwhomakesorpermitstobemadeanytransaction andmissions;and includingtheopeningofanaccountwithouttakingreasonablestepstoverify 120 TacklingmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica

thetrueidentityofthepersonconcernedonthetransaction,shallbeguiltyofan offence. 6 MrUkaisaseniorinsurancesalesmanwithOldMutual 7 SeeJaiBanda,MoneylaunderinginMalawi:Contemporarytrends,seminar paperpresentedtoISSRegionalSeminar,Developingstrategiesandmechanisms againstmoneylaunderinginEastandSouthernAfrica,LeribaLodge,Centurion, 22and23November,2002. 8 Section36oftheLegalEducationandLegalPractitionersAct,1965,Chapter. 3:04. 9 ServiceofProcessandExecutionofJudgmentsAct,1956,Chapter4:01. 10 Section30ofthePenalCode. 11 CorruptionPractices(DisposalofRecovered,SeizedorFrozenProperty) Regulations6N39/1999. 12 UnitedNationsSecurityCouncil,S/Res,1373(2001),p2. 13 Ibid,p3.