DOCSLIB.ORG

Replacement Class Screening for Aircraft Landings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Replacement Class Screening for Aircraft Landings Replacement Class Screening For Aircraft Landings In Aulavik National Park of Canada, Auyuittuq National Park of Canada, Ivvavik National Park of Canada, Kluane National Park and Reserve of Canada, Quttinirpaaq National Park of Canada, Sirmilik National Park of Canada, Tuktut Nogait National Park of Canada, and Ukkusiksalik National Park of Canada Parks Canada Agency December 2004 Replacement Class Screening Report for Aircraft Landings in the Northern National Parks of Canada Aulavik National Park of Canada, Auyuittuq National Park of Canada, Ivvavik National Park of Canada, Kluane National Park and Reserve of Canada, Quttinirpaaq National Park of Canada, Sirmilik National Park of Canada, Tuktut Nogait National Park of Canada, and Ukkusiksalik National Park of Canada Parks Canada Agency December 2004 Table of Contents GLOSSARY....................................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................... 2 1.1. NATIONAL PARKS CONTEXT ................................................................................. 2 1.1.1. Managing for ecological integrity .............................................................. 2 1.1.2. Managing for cultural resources ................................................................ 3 1.1.3. Managing for visitor experience................................................................. 3 1.1.4. Cooperative management ........................................................................... 4 1.2. CLASS SCREENING AND THE CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACT .... 4 1.3. REPLACEMENT CLASS SCREENING AND THE CANDIDATE CLASS ........................... 5 1.4. CONSULTATION ................................................................................................... 6 1.4.1. Review and comments by Federal Departments and Agencies and other Environmental Assessment Regimes....................................................... 6 1.4.2. Public consultation during development of RCS ........................................ 6 1.5. CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REGISTRY........................................ 6 2. PROJECTS SUBJECT TO THE CLASS SCREENING...................................... 7 2.1. PROJECTS SUBJECT TO THE ACT............................................................................ 7 2.2. PROJECTS EXCLUDED UNDER THE ACT ................................................................. 7 2.3. PROJECTS SUBJECT TO REPLACEMENT CLASS SCREENING..................................... 8 2.4. PROJECTS THAT REQUIRE REFERRALS TO FEDERAL OR TERRITORIAL DEPARTMENTS ..................................................................................................... 8 2.5. PROJECTS NOT SUBJECT TO THE RCS ................................................................... 8 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................... 11 3.1. TYPICAL SEASONAL SCHEDULING AND DURATION OF PROJECTS......................... 12 3.2. EFFECTS OF THE ENVIRONMENT ON THE PROJECT............................................... 12 3.3. ACCIDENTS/MALFUNCTIONS .............................................................................. 12 4. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ASSESSMENT................................................ 13 4.1. LAND USE AND MANAGEMENT IN THE NATIONAL PARKS.................................... 13 4.1.1. Aboriginal land use................................................................................... 13 4.1.2. National park zoning system..................................................................... 13 4.1.3. Visitor use ................................................................................................. 14 4.2. DESCRIPTION OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES .................................... 15 4.2.1. Vegetation and soil ................................................................................... 15 4.2.2. Wildlife...................................................................................................... 17 4.2.3. Aquatic resources...................................................................................... 20 4.2.4. Cultural resources .................................................................................... 21 4.2.5. Site specific ............................................................................................... 21 4.3. VALUED ECOSYSTEM COMPONENTS AND BOUNDARIES ...................................... 23 4.4. ANALYSIS OF EFFECTS AND MITIGATION ............................................................ 25 4.4.1. Management of solid waste....................................................................... 25 4.4.2. Management of human waste ................................................................... 27 4.4.3. Management and handling of fuel ............................................................ 28 4.4.4. Flight and operation of the aircraft.......................................................... 29 4.4.5. Approach and landing............................................................................... 33 4.5. ACCIDENTS AND MALFUNCTIONS....................................................................... 36 4.6. ANALYSIS AND PREDICTION OF SIGNIFICANCE OF RESIDUAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS............................................................................................................. 37 4.7. CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ANALYSIS....................................................................... 40 5. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES..................................................................... 43 5.1. RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITIES ............................................................................... 43 5.2. FEDERAL AUTHORITIES ...................................................................................... 43 5.3. COORDINATION WITH OTHER EA REGIMES ........................................................ 44 6. PROCEDURES FOR AMENDING THE REPLACEMENT CLASS SCREENING REPORT ................................................................................................. 44 6.1.1. Term of application................................................................................... 44 6.1.2. Review and amendment procedures.......................................................... 45 7. REFERENCES........................................................................................................ 45 APPENDIX A.................................................................................................................. 48 GENERAL MITIGATION FOR ALL PARKS .......................................................................... 48 AULAVIK NATIONAL PARK OF CANADA ........................................................................ 49 AUYUITTUQ NATIONAL PARK OF CANADA .................................................................... 50 IVVAVIK NATIONAL PARK OF CANADA.......................................................................... 51 KLUANE NATIONAL PARK AND RESERVE OF CANADA................................................... 51 QUTTINIRPAAQ NATIONAL PARK OF CANADA ............................................................... 53 SIRMILIK NATIONAL PARK OF CANADA......................................................................... 54 TUKTUT NOGAIT NATIONAL PARK OF CANADA............................................................. 55 UKKUSIKSALIK NATIONAL PARK OF CANADA ............................................................... 55 List of Figures FIGURE 1. LOCATION MAP................................................................................................. 10 List of Tables TABLE 1. TOTAL NUMBER OF VISITORS TO PARKS . ........................................................... 15 TABLE 2. POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF PROJECT ACTIVITIES......................... 26 TABLE 3: SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA DESCRIPTION............................................................... 37 TABLE 4. EVALUATION OF THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ADVERSE RESIDUAL EFFECTS ON VECS AFTER CONSIDERATION OF CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ..................................................... 40 Replacement Class Screening Report Glossary CEA – Cumulative Effects Assessment CEAA – Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency CEAR – Canadian Environmental Assessment Registry COSEWIC - Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada EA – Environmental Assessment ESA – Ecologically Sensitive Area ESS – Ecologically Sensitive Site FA – Federal Authority LMU – Land Management Units RA – Responsible Authority as defined under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act RCS – Replacement Class Screening The Act – The Canadian Environmental Assessment Act WCSC – Western Canada Service Centre 1 Replacement Class Screening Report 1. Introduction Eight northern national parks created over the past 28 years in the Yukon Territory, Northwest Territories and Nunavut Territory are not accessible by road or have large areas that are distant from roads. In order to participate in recreational activities, helicopters or fixed-wing aircraft have been used to bring visitors to these parks or remote areas of the parks. Since activities described in this report are referred to in the Inclusion List Regulations and require the issuance of business licences authorizing aircraft operation and landing for recreational purposes in national parks, an assessment under the Canadian Environmental Assessment
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Module 10: the Cold
    i2P • AP Module 10 • The Cold War The Cold War Module 10 - Akshayuk Pass Expedition Resolute Bay, 1953 – shortly after the Inuit from Inukjuaq and Pond Inlet were relocated. “The experiment we are making this year is to transfer a few families from Port Harrison and Pond Inlet to Resolute Bay on Cornwallis Is- land and Craig Harbor and Cape Herschel, on Ellesmere Island. The primary object is to find out how Eskimos from overpopulated southern areas can adapt themselves to conditions in the high Arctic where there is at present no Eskimo population.” - Acting Deputy Minister, Department of Resources and Development, Government of Canada, August 1953. i2P • Akshayuk Pass Education Resource 1 i2P • AP Module 10 • The Cold War TERRA INCOGNITA As the i2P expedition team treks through the Akshayuk Pass, the question should be asked, “Whose land are we on?” The answer, however, is not as straightforward as one might imagine. When you look at a standard world map, all the land on the globe is allotted one color or another, and each colored area of land has a name assigned to it – which indicates the country that governs that land. There are no tracts of land on the map that are not col- ored and do not belong to an assigned country. This was not always so. In fact for some people the thought that land could be owned was completely foreign. As we learned in module 4, human beings spread around the world from an original base in Africa. As they migrated and settled, they earned their livelihood from the land, either by hunting, fishing and gathering food, or by growing livestock and crops.
    [Show full text]
  • Akshayuk Pass, Ski Expedition
    Akshayuk Pass, Ski Expedition Program Descriptive: Akshayuk Pass, Auyuittuq National Park Majestic towers, carved in bedrock by glaciers, shooting straight for the sun: such scenery is what Auyuittuq National Park has to offer. It is, without a doubt, one of the most awe-inspiring places on Earth. Set in the middle of the Penny Ice Cap, bisected from North to South by the Akshayuk pass, an immense valley opens inland. An expedition surrounded by austere looking, barren plateaus, that will take you to two of the park’s most spectacular lookouts, Thor Peak and Mount Asgard. On your way, you will have an opportunity to see impressive rock formations dating back to the last ice age, ice caps, moraines, boulder fields, and much more. During this ski expedition, your will tread over terrain ranging from arid gravel to frozen river, with sharp peaks and a huge glacier in the backdrop. So many images that will remain with you forever. Following a 3-hour snowmobile ride from Qikiqtarjuaq we arrive at the park’s northern entrance, and then follow 11 days of cross-country skiing and 100 km of breathtaking scenery, to be crossed on skis, boots and crampons over the more difficult sections (especially the river’s ice cascades). Along the way, you will have an opportunity to see impressive rock formations dating back to the last ice age, moraines, boulder fields, with spectacular views of Mount Thor and Mount Asgard. Throughout the expedition, you will be mesmerized by the presence of glaciers, landscapes and mountains each more impressive than the last.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report: October 1, 2014 Assessing the Impact of Small, Canadian Arctic River Flows to the Freshwater Budget of the Canadian Archipelago Matthew B
    Annual Report: October 1, 2014 Assessing the impact of small, Canadian Arctic River flows to the freshwater budget of the Canadian Archipelago Matthew B. Alkire, University of Washington Assessing the impact of small, Canadian Arctic river flows to the freshwater budget of the Canadian Archipelago (or SCARFs) is a scientific research project funded by the National Science Foundation (USA). The purpose of this project is to collect water samples from seven different rivers and their adjoining estuaries throughout the Canadian Arctic Archipelago (see Fig. 1) in order to determine whether or not their chemical signatures differ from larger North American rivers such as the Mackenzie and Yukon Rivers. Five of the rivers are located within Nunavut, Canada: the Coppermine River (near Kugluktuk), Ellice River (~140 km southeast of Cambridge Bay), Back River (~180 km southeast of Gjoa Haven), Cunningham River (~77 km southeast of Resolute Bay on Somerset Island), and Kangiqtugaapik River (near Clyde River, Baffin Island). Two of the rivers are located within the Northwest Territories, Canada: the Kujjuua River (located approximately 67 km northeast of Ulukhaktok on Victoria Island) and Thomsen River (specifically near the mouth of the river where it empties into Castel Bay, on Banks Island). Figure 1. Map of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. The red stars indicate the mouths of the rivers sampled during this study: (1) Coppermine R., (2) Ellice R., (3) Back R., (4) Kuujuua R. (Victoria Island), (5) Thomsen R. (Banks Island), (6) Cunningham R. (Somerset Island), and (7) Clyde R. (Baffin Island). The Coppermine, Ellice, and Back Rivers are located on the mainland of Nunavut.
    [Show full text]
  • EXPERIENCES 2021 Table of Contents
    NUNAVUT EXPERIENCES 2021 Table of Contents Arts & Culture Alianait Arts Festival Qaggiavuut! Toonik Tyme Festival Uasau Soap Nunavut Development Corporation Nunatta Sunakkutaangit Museum Malikkaat Carvings Nunavut Aqsarniit Hotel And Conference Centre Adventure Arctic Bay Adventures Adventure Canada Arctic Kingdom Bathurst Inlet Lodge Black Feather Eagle-Eye Tours The Great Canadian Travel Group Igloo Tourism & Outfitting Hakongak Outfitting Inukpak Outfitting North Winds Expeditions Parks Canada Arctic Wilderness Guiding and Outfitting Tikippugut Kool Runnings Quark Expeditions Nunavut Brewing Company Kivalliq Wildlife Adventures Inc. Illu B&B Eyos Expeditions Baffin Safari About Nunavut Airlines Canadian North Calm Air Travel Agents Far Horizons Anderson Vacations Top of the World Travel p uit O erat In ed Iᓇᓄᕗᑦ *denotes an n u q u ju Inuit operated nn tau ut Aula company About Nunavut Nunavut “Our Land” 2021 marks the 22nd anniversary of Nunavut becoming Canada’s newest territory. The word “Nunavut” means “Our Land” in Inuktut, the language of the Inuit, who represent 85 per cent of Nunavut’s resident’s. The creation of Nunavut as Canada’s third territory had its origins in a desire by Inuit got more say in their future. The first formal presentation of the idea – The Nunavut Proposal – was made to Ottawa in 1976. More than two decades later, in February 1999, Nunavut’s first 19 Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) were elected to a five year term. Shortly after, those MLAs chose one of their own, lawyer Paul Okalik, to be the first Premier. The resulting government is a public one; all may vote - Inuit and non-Inuit, but the outcomes reflect Inuit values.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographical Report of the Crocker Land Expedition, 1913-1917
    5.083 (701) Article VL-GEOGRAPHICAL REPORT OF THE CROCKER LAND EXPEDITION, 1913-1917. BY DONALD B. MACMILLAN CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION......................................................... 379 SLEDGE TRIP ON NORTH POLAR SEA, SPRING, 1914 .......................... 384 ASTRONOMICAL OBSERVATIONS-ON NORTH POLAR SEA, 1914 ................ 401 ETAH TO POLAR SEA AND RETURN-MARCH AVERAGES .............. ........ 404 WINTER AND SPRING WORK, 1915-1916 ............. ......................... 404 SPRING WORK OF 1917 .................................... ............ 418 GENERAL SUMMARY ....................................................... 434 INTRODUCTJON The following report embraces the geographical work accomplished by the Crocker Land Expedition during -four years (Summer, 19.13, to Summer, 1917) spent at Etah, NortJaGreenland. Mr. Ekblaw, who was placed in charge of the 1916 expeditin, will present a separate report. The results of the expedition, naturally, depended upon the loca tion of its headquarters. The enforced selection of Etah, North Green- land, seriously handicapped the work of the expedition from start to finish, while the. expenses of the party were more than doubled. The. first accident, the grounding of the Diana upon the coast of Labrador, was a regrettable adventure. The consequent delay, due to unloading, chartering, and reloading, resulted in such a late arrival at Etah that our plans were disarranged. It curtailed in many ways the eageimess of the men to reach their objective point at the head of Flagler Bay, te proposed site of the winter quarters. The leader and his party being but passengers upon a chartered ship was another handicap, since the captain emphatically declared that he would not steam across Smith Sound. There was but one decision to be made, namely: to land upon the North Greenland shore within striking distance of Cape Sabine.
    [Show full text]
  • National Park System Plan
    National Park System Plan 39 38 10 9 37 36 26 8 11 15 16 6 7 25 17 24 28 23 5 21 1 12 3 22 35 34 29 c 27 30 32 4 18 20 2 13 14 19 c 33 31 19 a 19 b 29 b 29 a Introduction to Status of Planning for National Park System Plan Natural Regions Canadian HeritagePatrimoine canadien Parks Canada Parcs Canada Canada Introduction To protect for all time representa- The federal government is committed to tive natural areas of Canadian sig- implement the concept of sustainable de- nificance in a system of national parks, velopment. This concept holds that human to encourage public understanding, economic development must be compatible appreciation and enjoyment of this with the long-term maintenance of natural natural heritage so as to leave it ecosystems and life support processes. A unimpaired for future generations. strategy to implement sustainable develop- ment requires not only the careful manage- Parks Canada Objective ment of those lands, waters and resources for National Parks that are exploited to support our economy, but also the protection and presentation of our most important natural and cultural ar- eas. Protected areas contribute directly to the conservation of biological diversity and, therefore, to Canada's national strategy for the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity. Our system of national parks and national historic sites is one of the nation's - indeed the world's - greatest treasures. It also rep- resents a key resource for the tourism in- dustry in Canada, attracting both domestic and foreign visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • VUNTUT NATIONAL PARK Management Planning Program
    PROUDLY BRINGING YOU CANADA AT ITS BEST VUNTUT NATIONAL PARK Management Planning Program NEWSLETTER #1 OCTOBER, 2000 INTRODUCTION This newsletter launches the development of the first management plan for Vuntut National Park. The national park was established in 1995 under Chapter 10 of the Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation Final Agreement (VGFNFA). Interim Management Guidelines were approved in April, 2000 and provide management direction until a Management Plan is approved. Parks Canada, the North Yukon Renewable Resources Council (NYRRC) and the Vuntut Gwitchin government work cooperatively to manage the park. All three parties are represented on the planning team. The Management Plan will provide long term strategic direction for the management of the park to ensure ecological integrity and continued Vuntut Gwitchin traditional opportunities on the land. The Management Plan is required by legislation, guided by public consultation, developed by a planning team of cooperative managers, approved by the Minister of Canadian Heritage and tabled in Parliament. Once approved, the Management Plan will be reviewed every five years. This is your opportunity to assist in defining and achieving a future vision for Vuntut National Park. Public Participation Public input is a key element of the planning process. During the Arctic National development of the Management Plan, Wildlife newsletters and Public Open Houses Refuge will be the main methods used to share information. Meetings with Old Inuvik stakeholders will also provide valuable Crow input into the process. Vuntut The Planning Team members want to Anchorage hear from you. The first management Dawson City plan developed for a national park is critical as it will shape the future of the park.
    [Show full text]
  • ARCTIC CHANGE 2014 8-12 December - Shaw Centre - Ottawa, Canada
    ARCTIC CHANGE 2014 8-12 December - Shaw Centre - Ottawa, Canada Oral Presentation Abstracts Arctic Change 2014 Oral Presentation Abstracts ORAL PRESENTATION ABSTRACTS TEMPORAL TREND ASSESSMENT OF CIRCULATING conducted when possible. Results: Maternal levels of Hg and MERCURY AND PCB 153 CONCENTRATIONS AMONG PCB 153 significantly decreased between 1992 and 2013. NUNAVIMMIUT PREGNANT WOMEN (1992-2013) Overall, concentrations of Hg and PCB 153 among pregnant women decreased respectively by 57% and 77% over the last Adamou, Therese Yero (12) ([email protected]), M. Riva (12), E. Dewailly (12), S. Dery (3), G. Muckle (12), R. two decades. In 2013, concentrations of Hg and PCB 153 were Dallaire (12), EA. Laouan Sidi (1) and P. Ayotte (1,2,4) respectively 5.2 µg/L and 40.36 µg/kg plasma lipids (geometric means). Discussion: Our results suggest a significant decrease (1) Axe santé des populations et pratiques optimales en santé, of Hg and PCB 153 maternal levels from 1992 to 2013. Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Geometric mean concentrations of Hg and PCB 153 measured Québec, Québec,Québec, G1V 2M2 in 2013 were below Health Canada guidelines. The decline (2) Université Laval, Québec, Québec, G1V 0A6 observed could be related to measures implemented at regional, (3) Nunavik Regional Board of Health and Social Services, Kuujjuaq, Québec national and international levels to reduce environmental (4) Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec (INSPQ), pollution by mercury and PCB and/or a significant decrease Québec, G1V 5B3 of seafood consumption by pregnant women. These results have to be interpreted with caution.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern-Oral-History.Pdf
    1 PARKS CANADA, THE COMMEMORATION OF CANADA, AND NORTHERN ABORIGINAL ORAL HISTORY* ______ David Neufeld Parks Canada, established as a national government agency limits of related scientific knowledge were becoming more in 1885, is responsible for the protection and presentation of obvious. These social and environmental pressures affected Canada’s natural and cultural heritage through a network of Parks Canada and served to enhance the profile of aboriginal National Parks and National Historic Sites. National Parks, peoples in the strategic thinking of the organization’s originally selected for their natural beauty and recreational leadership. In 1985 the Historic Sites and Monuments Board opportunities, are now understood to be a representative of Canada (HSMBC), the federal body mandated to sanction sample of the different eco-systems characterizing the places, events, and persons of national historic significance, country’s environmental heritage. National Historic Sites acknowledged the cultural imbalance of the country’s address what are considered the significant themes of the national historic sites and recommended consultations with country’s history. Both parks and sites are powerful images First Nations to determine their interest in the national of what Canada is. commemoration of their history. Within National Parks, the The Story of Canada represented through these possibilities of aboriginal traditional ecological knowledge national heritage protected areas are, and remain, a concrete (TEK) seemed to offer a shortcut to indigenous peoples’ deep representation of a created place and a created past, both knowledge about the intricacies of eco-systems. Aboriginal shaped and moulded to spawn and maintain a unified sense peoples in Canada appeared about to get their due, or at least of national identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Caring for Canada
    312-329_Ch12_F2 2/1/07 4:50 PM Page 312 CHAPTER 12 Caring for Canada hink of a natural area that is special to you. What if Tthere was a threat to your special place? What could you do? You might take positive steps as David Grassby did recently. David Grassby was 12 years old when he read an article about environmental threats to Oakbank Pond near his home in Thornhill, Ontario. David decided to help protect the pond and its wildlife. David talked to classmates and community members. He discovered that writing letters and informing the media are powerful tools to get action. He wrote many letters to the Town Council, the CBC, and newspapers. He appeared on several TV shows, including The Nature of Things hosted by David Suzuki. In each of his letters and interviews, David explained the problems facing the pond and suggested some solutions. For example, people were feeding the ducks. This attracted too many ducks for the pond to support. David recommended that the town install signs asking people not to feed the ducks. The media were able to convince people to make changes. David Grassby learned that it is important to be patient and to keep trying. He learned that one person can make a difference. Today, Oakbank Pond is a nature preserve, home to many birds such as ducks, Canada geese, blackbirds, and herons. It is a peaceful place that the community enjoys. 312 312-329_Ch12_F2 2/1/07 4:50 PM Page 313 Canada: Our Stories Continue What David Grassby did is an example of active citizenship.
    [Show full text]
  • CANADIAN PARKS and PROTECTED AREAS: Helping Canada Weather Climate Change
    CANADIAN PARKS AND PROTECTED AREAS: Helping Canada weather climate change Report of the Canadian Parks Council Climate Change Working Group Report prepared by The Canadian Parks Council Climate Change Working Group for the Canadian Parks Council Citation: Canadian Parks Council Climate Change Working Group. 2013. Canadian Parks and Protected Areas: Helping Canada Weather Climate Change. Parks Canada Agency on behalf of the Canadian Parks Council. 52 pp. CPC Climate Change Working Group members Karen Keenleyside (Chair), Parks Canada Linda Burr (Consultant), Working Group Coordinator Tory Stevens and Eva Riccius, BC Parks Cameron Eckert, Yukon Parks Jessica Elliott, Manitoba Conservation and Water Stewardship Melanie Percy and Peter Weclaw, Alberta Tourism, Parks and Recreation Rob Wright, Saskatchewan Tourism and Parks Karen Hartley, Ontario Parks Alain Hébert and Patrick Graillon, Société des établissements de plein air du Québec Rob Cameron, Nova Scotia Environment, Protected Areas Doug Oliver, Nova Scotia Natural Resources Jeri Graham and Tina Leonard, Newfoundland and Labrador Parks and Natural Areas Christopher Lemieux, Canadian Council on Ecological Areas Mary Rothfels, Fisheries and Oceans Canada Olaf Jensen and Jean-François Gobeil, Environment Canada Acknowledgements The CPC Climate Change Working Group would like to thank the following people for their help and advice in preparing this report: John Good (CPC Executive Director); Sheldon Kowalchuk, Albert Van Dijk, Hélène Robichaud, Diane Wilson, Virginia Sheehan, Erika Laanela, Doug Yurick, Francine Mercier, Marlow Pellat, Catherine Dumouchel, Donald McLennan, John Wilmshurst, Cynthia Ball, Marie-Josée Laberge, Julie Lefebvre, Jeff Pender, Stephen Woodley, Mikailou Sy (Parks Canada); Paul Gray (Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources); Art Lynds (Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources).
    [Show full text]
  • CURRENT RESEARCH C Resources Natural Anada Geological Surveyofcanada C Naturelles Ressources Anada
    Geological Survey of Canada CURRENT RESEARCH 2006-G Geological Survey of Canada Radiocarbon Dates XXXV Collated by R. McNeely 2006 CURRENT RESEARCH Natural Resources Ressources naturelles Canada Canada ©Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2006 ISSN 1701-4387 Catalogue No. M44-2006/G0E-PDF ISBN 0-662-43811-6 A copy of this publication is also available for reference by depository libraries across Canada through access to the Depository Services Program's Web site at http://dsp-psd.pwgsc.gc.ca A free digital download of this publication is available from GeoPub: http://geopub.nrcan.gc.ca/index_e.php Toll-free (Canada and U.S.A.): 1-888-252-4301 Critical reviewers L. Dredge Author’s address R. McNeely Geological Survey of Canada Terrain Sciences Division 601 Booth Street Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E8 Publication approved by GSC Northern Canada Original manuscript submitted: 2005-12-15 Final version approved for publication: 2006-01-10 Correction date: All requests for permission to reproduce this work, in whole or in part, for purposes of commercial use, resale, or redistribution shall be addressed to: Earth Sciences Sector Information Division, Room 402, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E8. This date list, GSC XXXV, is the twenty-fourth to be published directly by the Geological Survey of Canada. Lists prior to GSC XII were published first in the journal Radiocarbon and were reprinted as GSC Papers. The lists through 1967 (GSC VI) were given new pagination, whereas lists VII to XI (1968 to 1971) were reprinted with the same pagination. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . 2 Acknowledgments .
    [Show full text]