Options for Phase Two of the High Speed Rail Network

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Options for Phase Two of the High Speed Rail Network Options for phase two of the high speed rail network A report to Government by HS2 Ltd 29 March 2012 © Copyright High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, March 2012 While High Speed Two Limited (HS2 Ltd) has made every effort to ensure the information in this document is accurate, HS2 Ltd does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of the information contained in this document and it cannot accept liability for any loss or damages of any kind resulting from reliance on the information or guidance this document contains. High Speed Two (HS2) Limited Registered in England. Registration number 06791686. Registered office Eland House, Bressenden Place, London SW1E 5DU [email protected] www.hs2.org.uk Preface to March 2012 reports This report was submitted to Government by HS2 Ltd at the end of March 2012 and is part of a suite of documents produced to provide preliminary advice to Government on potential options for phase two of the high speed rail network. For details of the initial preferred scheme selected by Government, please see the Command Paper1. The initial preferred scheme will form the basis of further engagement. A preferred scheme will be published in 2013 that will form the basis of full public consultation. Anyone reading the March 2012 reports should be aware of the following: • The reports describe the development of options. The base proposition referred to is not a recommended or preferred scheme. • The reports describe route and station options serving Heathrow T5. The options do not reflect an initial preferred scheme. The Government has announced its intention to suspend work on high speed rail options to Heathrow until the Airports Commission has reported. • Where the Ordnance Survey Licence Number is shown on maps it should read 100049190. 1 High Speed Rail: Investing in Britain’s Future Phase Two: The route to Leeds, Manchester and beyond Options for phase two of the high speed rail network HS2 Ltd Foreword In January 2012 the Government announced its decision to embark on the most significant transport project since the building of the motorways, the development and delivery of a new national high speed rail network. The announcement marked a significant point for HS2 Ltd coming three years after we were established to advise the Government about the case for high speed rail and provide proposals for the phase one development of a new high speed rail line between London and the West Midlands. This report is the first step in the development of phase two of the high speed rail network. In the proposals for the Y network we set out options for the onward legs from the West Midlands to Manchester and Leeds with stations in South Yorkshire and East Midlands and a direct high speed line serving a station at Heathrow. We also describe options for serving cities beyond the network, direct trains serving cities such as Liverpool, Newcastle, Glasgow and Edinburgh. Since being given our remit by Government for phase two, we have developed and refined the options described in this report adopting the same approach as we did for phase one. We have made use of expert analysis in engineering, sustainability and analytical fields and benefited from the involvement, in confidence, of our regional stakeholders. Their views have contributed significantly throughout the process and we are grateful for their input. The successful delivery of phase two, opening in 2032/33, will create a truly national high speed rail network. It will bring cities and regions of the north and south closer together as never before. It offers the opportunity to change the way people travel making high speed rail the mode of choice for long distance journeys. It is a once in a lifetime transport project that has the potential to deliver real economic growth across the country. The benefits must be balanced with the potential costs, and the financial and sustainability impacts have been crucial in the choices made and the options identified. This report begins the development of phase two of the high speed rail network. It provides the Government with the evidence and advice it needs to engage and take decisions on its preferred scheme. We look forward to continuing to work with the Government on the future development of high speed rail. Sir Brian Briscoe Chairman High Speed Two (HS2) Limited March 2012 - i - Options for phase two of the high speed rail network HS2 Ltd Contents Executive summary 1 Chapter 1 The context for high speed rail 10 1.1 Rationale and specific remit 10 1.2 HS2 Ltd’s remit and scope 12 1.3 The status of HS2 Ltd 13 1.4 The Government’s policy goals 15 Chapter 2 Our approach 17 2.1 Establishing the case – our approach 17 2.2 Design and appraisal – specification and assumptions 20 2.3 Our assumptions 21 Chapter 3 Methodology 25 3.1 Tackling our remit 25 3.2 Option generation and sifting 25 Chapter 4 West Midlands to Manchester 29 4.1 Introduction 29 4.2 Geographic overview 31 4.3 Routes between Lichfield, the Manchester outskirts and Golborne 34 4.4 Intermediate station options on the route to Manchester 70 4.5 Routes to Preston and interchange option 75 4.6 Approaches into Manchester city centre 89 4.7 Manchester city centre stations 106 4.8 Interchange station options in the Manchester area 126 4.9 Routes and stations: Key decisions for Government 144 Chapter 5 West Midlands to Leeds 146 5.1 Introduction 146 5.2 Geographic overview 148 5.3 Routes between Water Orton and East Midlands 153 5.4 East Midlands stations 176 5.5 Routes between East Midlands and South Yorkshire 196 5.6 South Yorkshire stations 225 5.7 Routes between South Yorkshire and Leeds 245 5.8 Leeds city centre station 263 5.9 Connecting to the ECML and interchange station options 284 5.10 Routes and stations: Key decisions for Government 296 Chapter 6 Heathrow 298 6.1 Introduction 298 6.2 Demand for international high speed rail services from Heathrow 311 Chapter 7 Maintenance and stabling infrastructure 314 7.1 Introduction 314 7.2 Maintenance depots - approach 314 7.3 Proposed depot options and alternatives 321 - ii - Options for phase two of the high speed rail network HS2 Ltd Chapter 8 Base proposition 332 8.1 Introduction 332 8.2 Base proposition 333 References 343 List of supporting documents 345 List of acronyms 346 Glossary of terms 347 Maps and images HS2 Ltd recommends that readers print high quality colour versions of this report to view the maps and images. On the maps and images contained within, where high speed route options appear to overlap with existing rail lines, this represents the high speed option running alongside the existing railway, not on top or in place of it. - iii - Options for phase two of the high speed rail network HS2 Ltd List of figures Figure 1.1 How HS2 proposals for phase one have developed 10 Figure 2.1 HS2 Ltd decision making process 17 Figure 3.1 The relationship between the sifting process and the development of options 25 Figure 4.1 Geographic overview of the Manchester leg corridor 31 Figure 4.2 Routes between Lichfield, the Manchester outskirts and Golborne long listing stage 36 Figure 4.3 Routes between Lichfield, the Manchester outskirts and Golborne short listing stage 39 Figure 4.4 Routes between Lichfield, the Manchester outskirts and Golborne selecting options for refinement stage 42 Figure 4.5 Routes between Lichfield, the Manchester outskirts and Golborne final options 46 Figure 4.6 Lichfield to Newcastle-under-Lyme northern route option with variant 47 Figure 4.7 Lichfield to Newcastle-under-Lyme southern option route 51 Figure 4.8 Newcastle-under-Lyme to Crewe western route 53 Figure 4.9 Liverpool, Crewe and other intermediate markets – demand for long distance travel 55 Figure 4.10 Newcastle-under-Lyme to Sandbach M6 route 58 Figure 4.11 Crewe to Golborne western route 60 Figure 4.12 Sandbach to Golborne M6 route 64 Figure 4.13 Sandbach to Golborne via Airport route 66 Figure 4.14 Demand for long distance travel in south Cheshire and north Staffordshire 71 Figure 4.15 Manchester leg intermediate station options 72 Figure 4.16 M6 Junction 16 intermediate station 73 Figure 4.17 Routes to Preston long listing stage 76 Figure 4.18 Routes to Preston short listing stage 77 Figure 4.19 Routes to Preston selecting options for refinement stage 79 Figure 4.20 Route from Golborne to Preston 81 Figure 4.21 Preston interchange station options 85 Figure 4.22 Preston M55 interchange option 86 Figure 4.23 Approaches to Manchester long listing stage 90 Figure 4.24 Approaches to Manchester short listing stage 91 Figure 4.25 Approaches to Manchester selecting options for refinement stage 92 Figure 4.26 Approaches to Manchester final approach route options 93 Figure 4.27 Airport and south Manchester tunnel route to Manchester 94 Figure 4.28 Mersey and tunnel approach to Manchester 97 Figure 4.29 M62 approach route to serve a station at Salford 100 Figure 4.30 Chat Moss corridor approach to Salford 102 Figure 4.31 Manchester and Metrolink area – demand for long distance travel 106 Figure 4.32 Manchester city centre station area options 109 - iv - Options for phase two of the high speed rail network HS2 Ltd Figure 4.33 Manchester city centre station long list to final options 112 Figure 4.34 Selecting the final options for Manchester city centre station 113 Figure 4.35 Proposed Manchester Piccadilly station layout 115 Figure 4.36 Manchester Piccadilly indicative station illustration 116 Figure 4.37 Proposed Salford Central Middlewood station layout 118 Figure 4.38 Salford Central Middlewood indicative
Recommended publications
  • Classical Nakedness in British Sculpture and Historical Painting 1798-1840 Cora Hatshepsut Gilroy-Ware Ph.D Univ
    MARMOREALITIES: CLASSICAL NAKEDNESS IN BRITISH SCULPTURE AND HISTORICAL PAINTING 1798-1840 CORA HATSHEPSUT GILROY-WARE PH.D UNIVERSITY OF YORK HISTORY OF ART SEPTEMBER 2013 ABSTRACT Exploring the fortunes of naked Graeco-Roman corporealities in British art achieved between 1798 and 1840, this study looks at the ideal body’s evolution from a site of ideological significance to a form designed consciously to evade political meaning. While the ways in which the incorporation of antiquity into the French Revolutionary project forged a new kind of investment in the classical world have been well-documented, the drastic effects of the Revolution in terms of this particular cultural formation have remained largely unexamined in the context of British sculpture and historical painting. By 1820, a reaction against ideal forms and their ubiquitous presence during the Revolutionary and Napoleonic wartime becomes commonplace in British cultural criticism. Taking shape in a series of chronological case-studies each centring on some of the nation’s most conspicuous artists during the period, this thesis navigates the causes and effects of this backlash, beginning with a state-funded marble monument to a fallen naval captain produced in 1798-1803 by the actively radical sculptor Thomas Banks. The next four chapters focus on distinct manifestations of classical nakedness by Benjamin West, Benjamin Robert Haydon, Thomas Stothard together with Richard Westall, and Henry Howard together with John Gibson and Richard James Wyatt, mapping what I identify as
    [Show full text]
  • Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Economic Case Department for Transport
    Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Economic Case Department for Transport 30 August 2017 Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Economic Case Report OFFICIAL SENSITIVE: COMMERCIAL Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for Department for Transport’s information and use in relation to Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Business Case. Atkins assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents. This document has 108 pages including the cover. Document history Job number: 5159267 Document ref: v4.0 Revision Purpose description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Interim draft for client Rev 1.0 - 18/08/2017 comment Revised draft for client Rev 2.0 18/08/2017 comment Revised draft addressing Rev 3.0 - 22/08/2017 client comment Rev 4.0 Final 30/08/2017 Client signoff Client Department for Transport Project Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Document title Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme: KO1 Final Business Case Job no. 5159267 Copy no. Document reference Atkins Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme | Version 4.0 | 30 August 2017 | 5159267 2 Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Economic Case Report OFFICIAL SENSITIVE: COMMERCIAL Table of contents Chapter Pages Executive Summary 7 1. Introduction 12 1.1. Background 12 1.2. Report Structure 13 2. Scope of the Appraisal 14 2.1. Introduction 14 2.2. Scenario Development 14 3. Timetable Development 18 3.1. Overview 18 4. Demand & Revenue Forecasting 26 4.1. Introduction 26 4.2. Forecasting methodology 26 4.3. Appraisal of Benefits 29 4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • High Speed Two: Full Speed Ahead?
    High Speed Two: Full Speed Ahead? The UK government has given the “green light” to the High Speed Two (HS2) rail project in its entirety, following the outcome of the Oakervee Review, ending months of speculation over the future of the scheme. Phase 2b of the project, linking Crewe to Manchester and Birmingham to Leeds via Sheffield, is subject to further review. It now forms part of an ambitious “High Speed North” integrated masterplan, including Northern Powerhouse Rail and other local rail improvements. What will this mean for landowners, occupiers and others who are directly affected by the HS2 scheme? Time will tell. However, the announcement is likely to be welcomed, as it provides certainty that the project will now proceed, although concerns over the long-term plans for delivery of Phase 2b will persist. HS2 Limited’s remit will be to “…focus solely on getting On all fronts, the government’s announcement gives phases 1 and 2A built on something approaching on time grounds for optimism. The government has pledged to learn and on budget” and, in respect of Phase 2b, new “delivery lessons from Phase 1 and improve how the project is being arrangements” will be put in place, but not before “…an delivered, highlighting the need for better communication and integrated plan for rail in the north” has been introduced. engagement with local communities impacted by the scheme. Grand plans no doubt, but close attention will be paid to the detail, including the enabling legislation required to deliver Major concerns will also remain over the delivery of the Phase 2a of the project and future plans for the design and scheme, including timescales for completion of each phase, delivery arrangements for Phase 2b.
    [Show full text]
  • Holmes Chapel Settlement Report
    Cheshire East Local Plan Site Allocations and Development Policies Document Holmes Chapel Settlement Report [ED 33] August 2020 OFFICIAL Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 2. Holmes Chapel .................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................... 2 Neighbourhood Development Plan ................................................................ 2 Strategy for development in Holmes Chapel ................................................. 2 3. Development needs at Homes Chapel ................................................................ 4 4. Site selection ....................................................................................................... 5 Introduction .................................................................................................... 5 Stage 1: Establishing a pool of sites for Holmes Chapel ............................... 5 Stage 2: First site sift ..................................................................................... 5 Stage 3: Decision point – the need for sites in Holmes Chapel ..................... 6 Stage 4: Site assessment, Sustainability Appraisal and Habitats Regulations Assessment ................................................................................................... 6 Stages 5 to 7: Evaluation and initial recommendations;
    [Show full text]
  • HOUSE of LORDS Parliamentary Debates
    2 Volume Index to the HOUSE OF LORDS Parliamentary Debates SESSION 2014–15 7th July, 2014—26th September, 2014 (VOLUME 755) £00·00 Obtainable on standing order only The first time a Member speaks to a new piece of parliamentary business, the following abbreviations are used to show their party affiliation: Abbreviation Party/Group CB Cross Bench Con Conservative Con Ind Conservative Independent DUP Democratic Unionist Party GP Green Party Ind Lab Independent Labour Ind LD Independent Liberal Democrat Ind SD Independent Social Democrat Lab Labour Lab Ind Labour Independent LD Liberal Democrat LD Ind Liberal Democrat Independent Non-afl Non-affiliated PC Plaid Cymru UKIP UK Independence Party UUP Ulster Unionist Party No party affiliation is given for Members serving the House in a formal capacity, the Lords spiritual, Members on leave of absence or Members who are otherwise disqualified from sitting in the House. © Parliamentary Copyright House of Lords 2015, this publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 7th July, 2014—26th September, 2014 1 - INDEX TO THE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES OFFICIAL REPORT INDEX FOR SESSION 2014–15, Volume 755 7th July, 2014—26th September, 2014 EXPLANATION OF ARRANGEMENT AND ABBREVIATIONS Dates of proceedings are indicated by numerals in brackets. Volume numbers are shown in square brackets. Bills: Read First, Second or Third Time = 1R, 2R, 3R. Column numbers in italics refer to Written Answers. - - A417: A436: Advisory Bodies: Ahmad of Wimbledon, Lord— Question, [755] (26.9.14) WA466. Questions, [755] (8.7.14) WA23.
    [Show full text]
  • Grade a Office Building Suites to Let from 786 - 3,905 Sq Ft Including Ample Car Parking Description Accommodation Location Aerial Terms Contact
    Nexus 4 Brindley Road, City Park, Old Trafford, Manchester M16 9HQ Grade A Office Building Suites To Let from 786 - 3,905 sq ft including ample car parking Description Accommodation Location Aerial Terms Contact Description Nexus is a modern headquarters style Grade A Nexus provides good quality office accommodation with all office suites office building situated at the entrance to City refurbished to a high standard. The property benefits from the following Park Business Village. The park benefits from 24 internal specification: hour access and security plus extensive on-site parking for staff and visitors. Neighbouring - Air conditioned office suites occupiers on the Park include British Red Cross, - Suspended ceilings with recessed LG3 lighting ADT Fire & Security, Intertek, Brooklyn Trading - Full accessed raised floors and Barratt Homes. - Disabled access and disabled WC’s - Passenger lift - Impressive feature entrance The park benefits from 104 car parking spaces adjacent to the building which provides an impressive car parking ratio of 1:250 sq ft. Description Accommodation Location Aerial Terms Contact Availability Ground Floor Plan Please see below for current availability. Let Demise Tenant Area sq ft Suite 2 Vacant 786 Suite 3 Vacant 1,378 Suite 6 Vacant 1,741 Vacant Suite 6 Total 3,905 *Suites can be combined or leased separately. Let Vacant Vacant Suite 2 Suite 3 Accommodation Description Accommodation Location Aerial Terms Contact d R ld e fi ld Re O gen t Rd B r oa dw ay d R d r o f City f T a Media CityUK r h T Centre
    [Show full text]
  • 65 January 1998
    Urban Design Quarterly The Journal of the Urban Design Group Issue 65 January 1998 Topic Landscape Architecture and Urban Design Case studies The Manchester Higher Education Project TfiTirrw Design Games in Tower Hamlets Forum for: Ian Bentley John Billingham Co-Chair of the Joint Centre for Urban Architect and Planner, formerly architects • town planners • Design, Oxford Brookes University. Director of Design and Development engineers • landscape architects Milton Keynes Development and all those interested in the John Biggs Corporation. quality of the built environment Urban Designer and Regional Coordinator for the South West. Bob Jarvis Senior Lecturer in Planning at South The Urban Design Group, founded Robert Brown Bank University School of Urban nineteen years ago, has been Architect working for Levitt Bernstein Development and Policy. Associates. established to provide high standards of Sebastian Loew performance and inter-professional Hugh Cannings Architect and Planner, until recently cooperation in planning, architecture, Architect and planner working for Principal Lecturer at the School of Austin -Smith:Lord Urban Development at South Bank urban design, and other related University. disciplines; and to educate the relevant Michael Crilly professions and the public in matters UDG regional coordinator for Marion Roberts Northern Ireland. Architect, writer and Senior Lecturer relating to urban design. Membership is in the School of Urban Development made up of architects, planners, Rupert Kemplay at the University of Westminster. landscape architects, engineers, Head of Landcare Landservices, a surveyors, historians, lawyers, landscape design and build business Jon Rowland based in Leeds. Architect and Urban Designer, photographers, in fact anyone interested previously technical Director of in the quality of our built environment.
    [Show full text]
  • East Midlands Intermodal Park SCOPING OPINION
    East Midlands Intermodal Park SCOPING OPINION September 2014 Scoping Opinion for the East Midlands Intermodal Park: Strategic Rail Freight Interchange CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................... 1 2.0 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ............................................ 4 3.0 EIA APPROACH AND TOPIC AREAS ..................................... 11 4.0 OTHER INFORMATION ........................................................ 23 APPENDIX 1 – LIST OF CONSULTEES APPENDIX 2 – RESPONDENTS TO CONSULTATION AND COPIES OF REPLIES APPENDIX 3 – PRESENTATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT Scoping Opinion for the East Midlands Intermodal Park: Strategic Rail Freight Interchange EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is the Scoping Opinion (the Opinion) provided by the Secretary of State in respect of the content of the Environmental Statement for the Proposed East Midlands Intermodal Park: Strategic Rail Freight Interchange (SRFI). This report sets out the Secretary of State’s opinion on the basis of the information provided in Goodman Shepherd (UK) Limited’s (‘the applicant’) report entitled ‘Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Report’ (August 2014) (‘the Scoping Report’). The Opinion can only reflect the proposals as currently described by the applicant. The Secretary of State has consulted on the Scoping Report and the responses received have been taken into account in adopting this Opinion. The Secretary of State is satisfied that the topic areas identified in the Scoping Report encompass those
    [Show full text]
  • Submission July 2015 Brereton Parish Neighbourhood Plan Brereton Neighbourhood Plan
    Brereton Neighbourhood Plan Submission July 2015 Brereton Parish Neighbourhood Plan Brereton Neighbourhood Plan “What you hear from the people of the parish and what you can see with your own eyes is how fortunate we are to live here. With our surrounding local towns expanding by the day we have a responsibility to preserve the best of what we have whilst meeting the needs of current and future generations.” John Charlesworth, Brereton resident and Neighbourhood Plan team member. Page 1 Brereton Parish Neighbourhood Plan About This Document Brereton Parish Neighbourhood Plan Submission This document is the Submission version of the Brereton Parish Neighbourhood Plan (the Plan). Regulation 15 of The Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012, directs that the Submission of the Neighbourhood Plan is used to submit to Cheshire East Council for formal consideration and wider consultation. In January 2013 Brereton Parish Council began to develop the Neighbourhood Plan with the aim of shaping the vision for Brereton Parish until 2030. In consultations over the last two years the whole community has helped to develop the Plan. You have told us what changes you would like to see within the Parish and how we can enhance and preserve the things you value most. This Plan and its proposed polices reflects these community aspirations and views, and will significantly influence future planning decisions for new developments within the Parish. Reference to Supporting Documents is widely used throughout the Plan. These references, for example (ref. SD/B01), relate to the table of Supporting Documents listed in Appendix B. The Plan has been prepared by Brereton Parish Council, the qualifying body responsible for creating the Neighbourhood Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Zenobia Kozak Phd Thesis
    =><9<@6;4 @52 =.?@! =>2?2>B6;4 @52 3A@A>2 , />6@6?5 A;6B2>?6@C 52>[email protected] 0<8820@6<;? .;1 612;@6@C 9.>72@6;4 DIQRFME 7R\EN . @LIUMU ?WFPMVVIH JRT VLI 1IKTII RJ =L1 EV VLI AQMXITUMV[ RJ ?V# .QHTIYU '%%* 3WOO PIVEHEVE JRT VLMU MVIP MU EXEMOEFOI MQ >IUIETGL-?V.QHTIYU,3WOO@IZV EV, LVVS,$$TIUIETGL"TISRUMVRT[#UV"EQHTIYU#EG#WN$ =OIEUI WUI VLMU MHIQVMJMIT VR GMVI RT OMQN VR VLMU MVIP, LVVS,$$LHO#LEQHOI#QIV$&%%'($)%+ @LMU MVIP MU STRVIGVIH F[ RTMKMQEO GRS[TMKLV @LMU MVIP MU OMGIQUIH WQHIT E 0TIEVMXI 0RPPRQU 8MGIQUI Promoting the past, preserving the future: British university heritage collections and identity marketing Zenobia Rae Kozak PhD, Museum and Gallery Studies 20, November 2007 Table of Contents List of Figures………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………1 List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….2 List of Acronyms and Abbreviations…………………………………………………………………………………......3 List of Appendices………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..4 Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………………………………………………5 Abstract……………………………………………………..………………………………………………………………………7 1. Introduction: the ‘crisis’ of university museums…………………………………………...8 1.1 UK reaction to the ‘crisis’…………………………………………………………………………………………………9 1.2 International reaction to the ‘crisis’…………………………………………………………………………………14 1.3 Universities, museums and collections in the UK………………………………………………………………17 1.3.1 20th-century literature review…………………………………………………………………………………19 1.4 The future of UK university museums and collections………………………………………………………24 1.4.1 Marketing university museums
    [Show full text]
  • LANCASHIRE TRAMWAYS – SL 238 08.10.20 Page 1 of 20 FARE STAGES & Other Main Stops
    1 LANCASHIRE TRAMWAYS – SL 238 08.10.20 page 1 of 20 FARE STAGES & other main stops See General Notes at head of ENGLAND TRAMWAYS list. Manchester & Salford NOT included (yet) £ or no symbol: fare stage (FS) name in fare tables or on tickets; t: name in public timetables (TT) + other (& very likely) main stops (e.g. at railway stations, town halls, selected loops (L)). #: names from histories; Former names: [ ]; i.d: stop only in this direction; o.d: stop only in other direction; tm: terminus; tkt: ticket Text in italics after name of stop is to aid location of stop and not part of the stop name For system maps, the various regional Tramways booklets issued by the Light Rail Transit Association are recommended ACCRINGTON CORPORATION TRAMWAYS George Street (Ashton, Dukinfield or Hyde?) √ tickets Hyde Boundary (which one?) Oswaldwistle Route Ashton – Oldham joint operation with Oldham Twys Market Place ex Oldham Ashton & Hyde Twy (OAHT) Depot t Ashton, Market Place [Ashton, Town Hall ] Grammar School Pitt & Nelson, Ashton Church Oldham Road Station Church, Station + Cranbourne Road Moscow Mill Street + Dog & Partridge Oswaldwistle, Town Hall Wellington Street [Wellington Inn ] Rhyddings Street +L Black Diamond Oswaldwistle, Library Halfway House, Bardsley Oswaldwistle, Black Dog Hathershaw [Oldham Road Terminus ] (connects with Oldham Twys to Oldham) Clayton Route Market Place Ashton - Snipe Inn Owen Street s: stops from Manchester Twys rule book 1914 Oakleigh later operated by Manchester Twys, service 28 Crown Hotel + Ashton, Market Place Church Lane Old Square Sydney Street +L Cavendish Street £ Load of Mischief Chester Square £ Clayton, Canal Bridge Crawthorne Road s Snipe Inn, Manchester Road £ [Ashton Boundary £ ] Haslingden Route (see Manchester Twys service 26) Market Place Christ Church Street Ashton – Haughton Green ex OAHT Harcourt Road [Victoria Loop ] joint with Manchester Twys service 57 [Victor’s Loop ? ] Ashton, Market Place (as above to:) Baxenden Mission [Mission Loop ] Chester Square St.
    [Show full text]
  • Response to Salford Draft Local Plan
    Salford Draft Local Plan Consultation Response from Friends of Walkden Station March 2019 Foreword Friends of Walkden Station (FOWS) are an award winning community voluntary group established to make practical environmental improvements to the station and to lobby constructively and effectively for improved facilities and rail services. We are very pleased to respond to the Salford Draft Local Plan consultation. FOWS have enjoyed a good working relationship with Salford City Council over more than a decade, and we greatly value the progress that we have made through constructive engagement with the Council on a range of developments for the station. Some of our most important priorities, such as step free access and park and ride provision, may now be close to coming to fruition. We are now looking to the future. Introduction FOWS endorse the need to produce a coherent and effective Local Plan that sets out how we develop our city in the years to come. We need to be both ambitious and realistic, to ensure that we can look to a future where the whole of Salford benefits from a better, fairer and more prosperous city, with greater opportunities for all. As a group focused on our railways, our response will mainly focus on the transport elements of the plan, and how transport in general, and railways in particular, can provide the fast, efficient and low carbon connectivity that our city will need. We will be making some new proposals which we feel will offer a once in a generation opportunity to deliver transformational change for our transport network in Salford.
    [Show full text]