DOCSLIB.ORG

Interim Runway Safety Area Study September 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Interim Runway Safety Area Study September 2017 Interim Runway Safety Area Study September 2017 INTERIM RUNWAY SAFETY AREA STUDY YEAGER AIRPORT PREPARED FOR: THE CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY PREPARED BY: LANDRUM & BROWN TEAM SEPTEMBER 2017 YEAGER AIRPORT INTERIM RUNWAY SAFETY AREA STUDY DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION.................................................................................... 1 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................. 1 2. RUNWAY SAFETY AREA STUDY (RSA STUDY) OBJECTIVES ................ 2 3. RUNWAY AND RSA BACKGROUND .................................................. 2 4. RSA STANDARDS ......................................................................... 6 5. EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................................ 7 6. RUNWAY LENGTH REQUIREMENTS ................................................. 9 6.1 RUNWAY LENGTH METHODOLOGY AND ASSUMPTIONS ............................ 9 6.1.1 DENSITY ALTITUDE ....................................................................... 9 6.1.2 RUNWAY CHARACTERISTICS ........................................................ 10 6.1.3 FLEET MIX .................................................................................. 11 6.2 TAKEOFF RUNWAY LENGTH REQUIREMENTS ........................................ 14 6.3 RUNWAY LANDING LENGTH REQUIREMENTS ........................................ 16 6.4 STAKEHOLDER INPUT ........................................................................ 18 6.4.1 AIRLINE AND CARGO OPERATORS ................................................. 18 6.4.2 GENERAL AVIATION ..................................................................... 20 6.4.3 MILITARY ................................................................................... 20 6.5 OVERALL RUNWAY LENGTH CONCLUSIONS .......................................... 21 7. GLIDE SLOPE REQUIREMENTS AND EFFECT ON RUNWAY LENGTH .................................................................................... 23 8. ALTERNATIVES .......................................................................... 25 8.1 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................ 25 8.2 2003 RSA STUDY ALTERNATIVES ........................................................ 26 8.3 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERATIONS ...................................................... 27 8.3.1 ADDITIONAL RSA LENGTH ............................................................ 27 8.3.2 STANDARD LENGTH EMAS ............................................................ 28 8.3.3 REDUCED LENGTH EMAS .............................................................. 30 8.3.3 RSA INCIDENT DATA ................................................................... 32 8.4 INITIAL ALTERNATIVES ..................................................................... 33 8.4.1 ALTERNATIVE 1: CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS ............................... 33 8.4.2 ALTERNATIVE 2: REDUCE RUNWAY UNDERSHOOT RSA .................... 34 September 2017 Page i Draft – For Discussion Purposes Only YEAGER AIRPORT INTERIM RUNWAY SAFETY AREA STUDY DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 8.4.3 ALTERNATIVE 3: REDUCE RUNWAY OVERRUN RSA .......................... 35 8.4.4 ALTERNATIVE 4: AIRPORT PROPOSAL ............................................ 36 8.4.5 ALTERNATIVE 5: 215-FOOT EMAS BED ALTERNATIVE ...................... 37 8.5 EVALUATION OF INITIAL ALTERNATIVES ............................................. 38 8.6 REFINED EMAS ALTERNATIVES ........................................................... 42 8.6.1 ALTERNATIVE 6: 180-FOOT EMAS WITH 100-FOOT EXTENSION AND RETAINING WALL .............................................................. 46 8.6.2 ALTERNATIVE 7: 180-FOOT EMAS – RETAIN RUNWAY 05 GLIDE SLOPE ..................................................................................... 47 8.6.3 ALTERNATIVE 8: 352-FOOT EMAS WITH STANDARD LENGTH RUNWAY 5 RSA AND 100-FOOT EXTENSION ................................ 48 8.6.4 ALTERNATIVE 9: 352-FOOT EMAS WITH STANDARD LENGTH RUNWAY 5 RSA AND 200-FOOT EXTENSION ................................ 49 8.7 EVALUATION OF REFINED ALTERNATIVES ............................................ 50 9. RECOMMENDED INTERIM SOLUTION ............................................ 54 9.1 RETAINING WALL FOR PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE ................................. 55 9.2 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE ............................................................. 55 9.3 PROJECT COST ................................................................................. 59 Appendix A – Runway Length: Operator Correspondence Database Appendix B – Runway Length Charts September 2017 Page ii Draft – For Discussion Purposes Only YEAGER AIRPORT INTERIM RUNWAY SAFETY AREA STUDY DRAFT LIST OF TABLES PAGE Table 4-1 CRW Critical Aircraft Composite (C-III) ...................................... 6 Table 6-1 Passenger and Cargo Fleet Mix ................................................ 11 Table 6-2 General Aviation Fleet Mix ...................................................... 13 Table 6-3 ASDA Requirement ................................................................ 21 Table 6-4 LDA Requirement .................................................................. 22 Table 7-1 Percent Wind Coverage of Runway 23 Versus 5 ......................... 24 Table 8-1 EMAS Lengths Required to Stop an Aircraft from 70 Knots .......... 28 Table 8-2 Aircraft Evaluated for 70 Knot Stopping Distance with EMAS ....... 29 Table 8-3 Initial Alternatives Evaluation Matrix ........................................ 39 Table 8-4 Refined EMAS Alternatives ...................................................... 45 Table 8-5 Refined EMAS Alternatives Evaluation ...................................... 51 Table 9-1 Alternative 9 Project Cost ....................................................... 59 September 2017 Page i Draft – For Discussion Purposes Only YEAGER AIRPORT INTERIM RUNWAY SAFETY AREA STUDY DRAFT LIST OF EXHIBITS PAGE Exhibit 3-1 Existing Airport Configuration ................................................... 3 Exhibit 5-1 Declared Distances Post-Slope Failure ........................................ 7 Exhibit 6-1 Passenger and Cargo Takeoff Length Requirements ................... 14 Exhibit 6-2 General Aviation Takeoff Length Requirements ......................... 15 Exhibit 6-3 Passenger and Cargo Landing Length Requirements .................. 16 Exhibit 6-4 General Aviation Landing Length Requirements ......................... 17 Exhibit 8-1 Additional RSA Length............................................................ 27 Exhibit 8-2 B737-400 EMAS Planning Chart .............................................. 31 Exhibit 8-3 B737 EMAS Planning Chart ..................................................... 32 Exhibit 8-4 Alternative 1: Construction Standards ...................................... 33 Exhibit 8-5 Alternative 2: Reduce Runway Undershoot RSA Alternative ........ 34 Exhibit 8-6 Alternative 3: Reduce Runway Overrun RSA ............................. 35 Exhibit 8-7 Alternative 4: Previously Proposed Alternative .......................... 36 Exhibit 8-8 Alternative 5: 215-Foot EMAS ................................................. 37 Exhibit 8-9 Retaining Wall to Support 100-Foot Extension ........................... 43 Exhibit 8-10 Retaining Wall to Support 200-Foot Extension ........................... 44 Exhibit 8-11 Alternative 6: 180-Foot EMAS with 100-Foot Extension and Retaining Wall ....................................................................... 46 Exhibit 8-12 Alternative 7: 180-Foot EMAS – Retain Runway 05 Glide Slope ................................................................................... 47 Exhibit 8-13 Alternative 8: 352-Foot EMAS with Standard Length Runway 05 RSA and 100-Foot Extension .................................. 48 Exhibit 8-14 Alternative 9: 352-Foot EMAS with Standard Length Runway 05 RSA and 200-Foot Extension .................................. 49 Exhibit 9-1 Alternative 9 Detail ................................................................ 54 Exhibit 9-2 Retaining Wall Detail.............................................................. 56 Exhibit 9-3 Proposed Implementation Schedule ......................................... 57 September 2017 Page ii Draft – For Discussion Purposes Only YEAGER AIRPORT INTERIM RUNWAY SAFETY AREA STUDY DRAFT INTRODUCTION Yeager Airport (CRW) is a joint-use civil aviation/Air National Guard airport located three miles east of Charleston, West Virginia, the state’s capital. Owned and operated by the Central West Virginia Regional Airport Authority (CWVRAA), CRW is the largest airport in the state and generates over 174 million dollars per year in economic impact to the state. The Airport offers approximately 20 daily scheduled flights from four airlines serving domestic destinations, and more than 225,000 passengers annually.1 The Airport is also home to the West Virginia Air National Guard’s 130th Airlift Wing, an Air Mobility Command (AMC) unit, and a thriving general aviation community. The Airport serves as a vital component to the state’s transportation system and serves as a key asset to the existing and future development of the area. 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On March 12, 2015, a failure of a mechanically stabilized earth retention structure (slope failure) destroyed the Runway 05 Runway Safety Area (RSA) and Engineered Materials Arresting System (EMAS).2 The EMAS was eight years old at the time and sat atop an engineered
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Airline Competition Plan Final Report
    Final Report Airline Competition Plan Philadelphia International Airport Prepared for Federal Aviation Administration in compliance with requirements of AIR21 Prepared by City of Philadelphia Division of Aviation Philadelphia, Pennsylvania August 31, 2000 Final Report Airline Competition Plan Philadelphia International Airport Prepared for Federal Aviation Administration in compliance with requirements of AIR21 Prepared by City of Philadelphia Division of Aviation Philadelphia, Pennsylvania August 31, 2000 SUMMARY S-1 Summary AIRLINE COMPETITION PLAN Philadelphia International Airport The City of Philadelphia, owner and operator of Philadelphia International Airport, is required to submit annually to the Federal Aviation Administration an airline competition plan. The City’s plan for 2000, as documented in the accompanying report, provides information regarding the availability of passenger terminal facilities, the use of passenger facility charge (PFC) revenues to fund terminal facilities, airline leasing arrangements, patterns of airline service, and average airfares for passengers originating their journeys at the Airport. The plan also sets forth the City’s current and planned initiatives to encourage competitive airline service at the Airport, construct terminal facilities needed to accommodate additional airline service, and ensure that access is provided to airlines wishing to serve the Airport on fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory terms. These initiatives are summarized in the following paragraphs. Encourage New Airline Service Airlines that have recently started scheduled domestic service at Philadelphia International Airport include AirTran Airways, America West Airlines, American Trans Air, Midway Airlines, Midwest Express Airlines, and National Airlines. Airlines that have recently started scheduled international service at the Airport include Air France and Lufthansa. The City intends to continue its programs to encourage airlines to begin or increase service at the Airport.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-06-21 Commercial Aviation: Initial Small Community Air Service
    United States Government Accountability Office GAO Report to Congressional Addressees November 2005 COMMERCIAL AVIATION Initial Small Community Air Service Development Projects Have Achieved Mixed Results a GAO-06-21 November 2005 COMMERCIAL AVIATION Accountability Integrity Reliability Highlights Initial Small Community Air Service Highlights of GAO-06-21, a report to Development Projects Have Achieved congressional addressees Mixed Results Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found Over the last decade significant The Small Community Air Service Development Program grants are awarded changes have occurred in the at the discretion of the Secretary of Transportation. GAO found that DOT airline industry. Many legacy considered the statutory eligibility criteria and priority factors as well as carriers are facing challenging other factors in evaluating proposals and in making awards. The number of financial conditions and low cost grant applications has declined since 2002. DOT officials see this as a carriers are attracting passengers away from some small community consequence of the large number of ongoing grants and the impact of 2003 airports. These changes, and legislative changes. In surveying airport directors we found that grantee others, have challenged small airports generally responded positively to DOT’s process for awarding communities to attract adequate grants, about two-thirds were satisfied with the clarity of the selection commercial air service. criteria, while about one-third of directors at airports not receiving grants were satisfied with the clarity. DOT oversight is based on reviews of grantee To help small communities reports and reimbursement requests, and DOT has terminated some projects improve air service, Congress and reallocated the unexpended funds to others.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release Nonstop Service to Orlando Coming to Yeager Airport
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE PRESS RELEASE NONSTOP SERVICE TO ORLANDO COMING TO YEAGER AIRPORT Starting February 14th, 2020, Spirit Airlines will add year-round, nonstop service to Orlando International Airport (MCO). The flights are going to be on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday of every week. This is the first time Yeager Airport has had a nonstop flight to Orlando since 2012. “This is an exciting opportunity for not only the airport but our passengers as well,” said Yeager Airport Director, Nick Keller. “We are all going to Disney World,” said Kanawha County Commission President Kent Carper. I would like to specifically thank Senator Manchin, Senator Capito, Congressman Mooney and Governor Justice for their help on this project, we could not have done it without them. I certainly would like to thank the staff and the Yeager Board for their hard work to make this happen. Without the completion of the Runway 5 rebuild and the restoration of the EMAS at Yeager Airport—a $25 Million project—this could not have happened. The very date that we are announcing this flight the rebuild has been finished for just four months.” Spirit will utilize Yeager Airport’s US Department of Transportation Small Community Air Service Development (SCASD) grant to initiate and market this service. The airline will operate the flight on Airbus 319 or 320s aircraft. “I am happy to see Spirit Airlines expanding their flight service to Orlando,” said Kanawha County Commissioner Hoppy Shores. “Yeager Airport is the Best Airport in West Virginia and we are expanding, and this low-cost carrier is helping make it happen.” 100 Airport Road – Suite 175 | Charleston, West Virginia 25311 | 304.344.8033 “The new flight to Orlando serviced by Spirit Airlines is a great addition to Yeager Airport,” said Kanawha County Commissioner Ben Salango.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum FAA Order 1050.1 Guidance Memo
    In December 2012, AEE issued Guidance for Implementation of the Categorical Exclusion in Section 213(c)(1) of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (see Attachment A), hereafter referred to as CATEX1 Memo. This memorandum provides clarified guidance to: • Provide more precision on the types of airports and procedures to which this CATEX may be applied; • Provide guidance on appropriate airport operator and community engagement; and • Require concurrence by the Office of Environment and Energy (AEE-400) and the Office of Chief Counsel (AGC-600) prior to the use of this CATEX. Applicable Airports: Core Airports: As the original CATEX1 Memo specified, the CATEX applies to Area Navigation System (RNAV) and Required Navigation Performance (RNP) and procedures at the 30 Core Airports and any medium or small hub airport located within the same metroplex area considered appropriate by the Administrator. FAA has defined specific airport categories (including medium and small hub airports) based on number of enplanements1. The definitions are contained in 49 USC 47102(13) and (25), and provided below: o A medium hub airport means a commercial service airport that has at least 0.25 but less than 1.0 percent of passenger boardings. 1 http://www.faa.gov/airports/planning_capacity/passenger_allcargo_stats/categories/ 1 o A small hub airport means a commercial service airport that has at least 0.05 percent but less than 0.25 percent of passenger boardings. A list of the applicable Core Airports and the associated medium and small hub airports, to which this CATEX may potentially apply, are included in Attachment B.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release American Airlines to Add Daily Yeager Airport (Crw)— Chicago O’Hare (Ord) Flight
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE PRESS RELEASE AMERICAN AIRLINES TO ADD DAILY YEAGER AIRPORT (CRW)— CHICAGO O’HARE (ORD) FLIGHT Beginning September 4th, 2019, American Airlines passengers will be able to travel to Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport (ORD) from Yeager Airport (CRW), daily. This additional flight to Chicago adds to continued growth at CRW, which experienced a 6.5% increase in enplanements in 2018 and has already seen an 8% increase thus far in 2019. The increase represents more than 3,386 additional enplanements compared to this time last year. “This will also help keep airfare out of CRW competitive,” says Airport Director, Terry Sayre, “and provide additional options for our passengers to connect to new destinations.” In 2018, OAG, the global authority on air service information, named the American Airlines hub at Chicago O’Hare International Airport the best-connected U.S. airport and a leading international hub — second only to London Heathrow (LHR) — in its 2018 Megahubs U.S. Index. ORD has 506 daily flights that serve 137 destinations in 12 countries. “Everyone at CRW is working tirelessly to improve our flight offerings, our facility and the general passenger experience,” said Sayre. “We would not be where we are today without the support of our Governor, our Congressional Delegation and the Kanawha County Commission.” American Airlines offers nonstop flights between CRW and Charlotte Douglas International Airport (CLT), Philadelphia International Airport (PHL) and Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport 100 Airport Road – Suite 175 | Charleston, West Virginia 25311 | 304.344.8033 (DCA). American Airlines and American Eagle offer an average of nearly 6,700 flights per day to nearly 350 destinations in more than 50 countries.
    [Show full text]
  • DCA10IA022 History of Flight on January 19, 2010, the Flight Crew of PSA Airlines, Doing Business As US Airways Express Flight 2
    National Transportation Safety Board Washington, DC 20594 Brief of Incident Adopted 10/29/2010 DCA10IA022 File No. 0 01/19/2010 Charleston, WV Aircraft Reg No. N246PS Time (Local): 16:00 EST Make/Model: Bombardier / CL600 Fatal Serious Minor/None Engine Make/Model: Ge / CF34-3B1 Crew 0 0 3 Aircraft Damage: Minor Pass 0 0 31 Number of Engines: 2 Operating Certificate(s): Flag Carrier/Domestic; Supplemental Name of Carrier: PSA AIRLINES INC Type of Flight Operation: Scheduled; Domestic; Passenger Only Reg. Flight Conducted Under: Part 121: Air Carrier Last Depart. Point: Same as Accident/Incident Location Condition of Light: Day Destination: Charlotte, NC Weather Info Src: Unknown Airport Proximity: On Airport/Airstrip Basic Weather: Visual Conditions Airport Name: Yeager Airport Lowest Ceiling: 2600 Ft. AGL, Overcast Runway Identification: 23 Visibility: 10.00 SM Runway Length/Width (Ft): 6300 / 150 Wind Dir/Speed: 290 / 003 Kts Runway Surface: Asphalt Temperature (°C): 9 Runway Surface Condition: Dry Precip/Obscuration: Pilot-in-Command Age: 38 Flight Time (Hours) Certificate(s)/Rating(s) Total All Aircraft: 9525 Airline Transport; Commercial; Multi-engine Land; Single-engine Land Last 90 Days: 169 Total Make/Model: 4608 Instrument Ratings Total Instrument Time: UnK/Nr Airplane DCA10IA022 History of Flight On January 19, 2010, the flight crew of PSA Airlines, doing business as US Airways Express flight 2495, rejected the takeoff of a Bombardier CL-600-2B19, N246PS, which subsequently ran off the runway end and then stopped in the engineered materials arresting system (EMAS) installed in the runway end safety area at Yeager Airport (CRW), Charleston, West Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release-Crw Back to Full Service
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE PRESS RELEASE A RETURN TO FULL SKIES AT YEAGER AIRPORT More than one year into the Pandemic, there is some normalcy returning to Yeager Airport (CRW). Starting June 3rd, American Airlines is resuming service from Yeager Airport to Philadelphia International Airport (PHL). With the restart of this flight, all temporarily paused routes at CRW due to COVID-19 have returned. “This is great news for our entire region,” said Yeager Airport Director and CEO Nick Keller. “We have all worked incredibly hard to get to this point. It is great to see that hard work pay off.” Spirit Airlines also announced the return of their seasonal route to Myrtle Beach International Airport (MYR). The first flight is Thursday, May 6th. MYR flights will be bi-weekly on Thursday and Sunday and run through Labor Day Weekend. The announcement of these two flights returning coincides with CRW seeing an increasing number of daily passengers. The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) screened 710 passengers at Yeager Airport on Thursday, April 1st. That is the highest number of people screened in one day since the beginning of the COVID-19 Pandemic. To buy tickets for Myrtle Beach or Orlando, check out the Spirit Airlines website. If you would like to purchase tickets at the counter, the Spirit ticket counter at CRW is open Wednesday and Friday from noon to 4 P.M. To buy tickets for Philadelphia, go to the American Airlines website. 100 Airport Road – Suite 175 | Charleston, West Virginia 25311 | 304.344.8033 About Yeager Airport (CRW): Yeager Airport is the largest commercial Airport in West Virginia, with service provided by American, Delta, Spirit, and United Airlines.
    [Show full text]
  • Worldwide Timetable Validity Period: Sunday, 1St April 2018 to Monday, 30Th April 2018
    Worldwide Timetable Validity Period: Sunday, 1st April 2018 to Monday, 30th April 2018 From Fort Myers (FMY) To Fort Myers (FMY) From To Frequency Dep Arr Flight a/c Via Arr Dep Flight a/c From To Frequency Dep Arr Flight a/c Via Arr Dep Flight a/c Acapulco - Juan N. Alvarez Intl Airport (ACA) Acapulco - Juan N. Alvarez Intl Airport (ACA) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Apr-14 Apr-28 - - - - - 67 3:25p 11:17p UA6202* E7W IAH 6:04p 8:00p UA2184 EQV Operated By Mesa Airlines Dba United Express Akron/Canton - Akron/Canton Regional Airport (CAK) Akron/Canton - Akron/Canton Regional Airport (CAK) Apr-3 - 1234567 6:18a 11:29a AA1844 321 CLT 8:15a 9:49a AA5245* CR2 Apr-2 Apr-11 1 - 3 - 56 - 6:00a 8:35a NK0283 319 NONSTOP Operated By Psa Airlines as American Eagle - Apr-2 1 - - - - - 7 6:40a 11:17a AA0648 321 CLT 8:38a 9:40a AA5245* EQV Apr-3 Apr-27 1234567 9:00a 1:56p AA5457* CR2 CLT 10:40a 11:50a AA0701 EQV Operated By Psa Airlines as American Eagle Operated By Psa Airlines as American Eagle Apr-3 Apr-3 - 2 - - - - - 8:20a 1:23p AA2367 73H CLT 10:18a 11:45a AA5239* CR7 Apr-29 - 1 - - - - - 7 9:00a 1:56p AA5457* CR2 CLT 10:40a 11:50a AA0701 EQV Operated By Psa Airlines as American Eagle Operated By Psa Airlines as American Eagle Apr-3 - 1234567 10:11a 2:50p AA1820 EQV CLT 12:10p 1:19p AA5243* EQV Apr-3 - 1234567 1:58p 6:10p AA5239* CR7 CLT 3:35p 4:14p AA0842 EQV Operated By Psa Airlines as American Eagle Operated By Psa Airlines as American Eagle - Apr-2 1 - - - - - 7 10:13a 2:27p AA1820 EQV CLT 12:14p 12:59p AA5243* CR2 Apr-3 - 12345 -
    [Show full text]
  • Date Time Location City Location State Report Narrative Distance from Airport (Miles) Drone Altitude (Feet) Drone-Aircraft Proxi
    Drone Sightings and Close Encounters This is a Center for the Study of the Drone Research Document. For more information, email [email protected] Distance from Drone Altitude Drone-Aircraft Manned Aircraft Manned Aircraft Manned Aircraft Date Time Location City Location State Report Narrative Airport (Miles) (Feet) Proximity (Feet) Incident Category Model Owner Class Drone Description During Air Operations on the fire, a media small helicopter drone was launched in front of Big Sur Station. Fortunately, with the heavy media coverage a PIO witnessed the drone and was able to quickly convince the media involved to bring the drone down to the ground so as not to interfere with Incident aircraft. A TFR was in place and Air attack and Helicopters were in the airspace and had no conflict with the 12/17/2013 14:00:00 Big Sur California low flying drone. Sighting Multirotor Pilot reported near miss. A Helicopter departed and at 750 FT had a near miss with a UAV painted white and very difficult to detect against the background. UAV was reported as a fixed Fixed-wing, 5 ft. 2/11/2014 Picayune Muni Mississippi wing aircraft, with a wingspan of approximately 5 FT 750 Close Encounter Helicopter Helicopter wingspan Reported for domain awareness. Both pilot and right seat non-pilot occupant observed what appeared to be an unmanned aircraft and tracked it from our 11 o'clock to our 4 o'clock for approximately 45 seconds. We were level 10,000 MSL at the time and altitude of unidentified aircraft estimated 9,000 and under power.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Impact of the Airline Industry in the South Douglas Jacobson May 2004
    The Council of State Governments ~ P.O. Box 98129~ Atlanta, Georgia 30359 ~ 404/633-1866 ~ www.slcatlanta.org The Economic Impact of the Airline Industry in the South Douglas Jacobson May 2004 Introduction The airline industry serves not just as an economic engine for states, cities and regions, but as a cog in the essential network of transportation within the United States. Furthermore, airlines, with their familiar names and easily recognizable symbols, can bring a sense of unity to the large communities which they serve. The industry creates its impact not just by providing direct employment, but also through the creation of opportunities throughout the travel and hospitality sector of the economy. Jobs in hotels, resorts, restaurants and car rental agencies, just to mention one small part of the economy, depend to differing degrees on the health of the airline industry. Yet the industry finds itself in a very difficult period. With the new focus on homeland security in the United States, exacerbated by war, the terrorist attacks of 2001, a downturn in the economy, and anomalies such as the SARS virus, the airline industry has found itself in a state of turmoil, loss and great trepidation. With the industry especially important to its birthplace, the Southern region, this report highlights the contributions of carriers to local and regional economies and the challenges that face them in Southern states. Recent headlines concerning airlines have an enormous array of expensive equipment been dominated by tales of layoffs, corporate and facilities such as aircraft and hangars. In malfeasance, bankruptcies, severance packages a very capital-intensive business, most of this and labor strife.
    [Show full text]
  • (Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration, 1998) 1997
    1997-2017 Update to FAA Historical Chronology: Civil Aviation and the Federal Government, 1926-1996 (Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration, 1998) 1997 January 2, 1997: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued an airworthiness directive requiring operators to adopt procedures enabling the flight crew to reestablish control of a Boeing 737 experiencing an uncommanded yaw or roll – the phenomenon believed to have brought down USAir Flight 427 at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in 1994. Pilots were told to lower the nose of their aircraft, maximize power, and not attempt to maintain assigned altitudes. (See August 22, 1996; January 15, 1997.) January 6, 1997: Illinois Governor Jim Edgar and Chicago Mayor Richard Daley announced a compromise under which the city would reopen Meigs Field and operate the airport for five years. After that, Chicago would be free to close the airport. (See September 30, 1996.) January 6, 1997: FAA announced the appointment of William Albee as aircraft noise ombudsman, a new position mandated by the Federal Aviation Reauthorization Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-264). (See September 30, 1996; October 28, 1998.) January 7, 1997: Dredging resumed in the search for clues in the TWA Flight 800 crash. The operation had been suspended in mid-December 1996. (See July 17, 1996; May 4, 1997.) January 9, 1997: A Comair Embraer 120 stalled in snowy weather and crashed 18 miles short of Detroit [Michigan] Metropolitan Airport, killing all 29 aboard. (See May 12, 1997; August 27, 1998.) January 14, 1997: In a conference sponsored by the White House Commission on Aviation Safety and Security and held in Washington, DC, at George Washington University, airline executives called upon the Clinton Administration to privatize key functions of FAA and to install a nonprofit, airline-organized cooperative that would manage security issues.
    [Show full text]
  • OAG FV XML for FIDS Integration Guide
    OAG FV XML for FIDS Integration Guide FVXML for FIDS Integration Guide - Version 1.0 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 3 2. FlightView XML Servers ........................................................................................ 3 3. Standard Use Cases ................................................................................................ 3 4. Query Format ......................................................................................................... 3 4.1 Request Parameters ..................................................................................................... 4 4.1.1 Request Parameters for Standard Use Cases........................................................................... 5 4.2 Response Parameters ................................................................................................... 5 4.3 Additional Customer Configurations ......................................................................... 5 5. XML Response Format ........................................................................................... 6 5.1 Header ........................................................................................................................... 6 5.2 Results Status................................................................................................................ 6 5.3 Flight Elements ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]