The Future of Bad Collectivity By Ali Aslam Mount Holyoke College Email:
[email protected] Presented at University of Connecticut Political Theory Workshop, September 27, 2016 Please do not cite without author’s permission The ability of the political Left to organize a collective response to recent political and economic crises has been a series of failures. As nativist groups on the Right have rallied to close borders on both sides of the Atlantic and pass laws restricting access to bathroom facilities in the United States, citizens in the wake of Occupy have struggled to translate their anger over police shootings and economic ineQualities into meaningful changes. At one level, the worry is that these failures deepen the sense of disenfranchisement that many citizens must already overcome in order to join others in action during an era when the responses to crises that concentrate decision-making in non-democratic bodies that have been justified as “necessary.”1 At another, there is the fear that once the exuberance of episodic democracy passes, Quotidian democratic participation is further discredited because nothing changes. The problem of forming Left collectivities and motivating citizens to join them is one with serious stakes for both activists and theorists. Those on the Left have watched as Right- wing groups have been able to mobilize citizens through affect appeals to their fears, anxiety, and feelings of vulnerability. Citizens hearing these messages do not appear to be listening for or much concerned the truth. Rather as the results of the Brexit vote and Donald Trump’s unexpected ascendency to the Republican nomination suggest, citizens are not moved by the power of rational argumentation but fantasy, illusion, and falsehood if these resonate with their feelings of injury and vulnerability.