DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 149 / Thursday, August 1, 1996 / Notices 40183

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 149 / Thursday, August 1, 1996 / Notices 40183 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 149 / Thursday, August 1, 1996 / Notices 40183 Frequency of Responses: Reporting: Room 416, BARC±W, Beltsville, Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forests; On occasion. Maryland 20705±2350. September 25, 1985 Total Burden Hours: 4. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cherokee National Forest; April 1, 1986 Jefferson National Forest; October 16, • Food and Consumer Service Andrew Watkins of the Office of Technology Transfer at the Beltsville 1985 Sumter National Forest; August 2, 1985 Title: Negative Quality Control address given above: telephone: 301/ Review ScheduleÐStatus of Sample 504±6905. The agency invites written comments Selection and CompletionÐStatistical within the scope of the analysis SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Summary of Sample Disposition. described below. In addition, the agency Federal Government's plant variety gives notice that an open and full Summary: As part of a Performance protection rights to this variety are Reporting System, each state agency is environmental analysis and decision- assigned to the United States of making process will occur on the required to provide a systematic means America, as represented by the of determining the accuracy of proposed actions so that interested and Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the affected people are aware of how they household eligibility and measuring the public interest to so License this extent to which households receive the may participate and contribute to the invention, for the University of Georgia final decision. food stamp allotment to which they are Research Foundation has submitted a DATES: The agency expects to file the entitled. complete and sufficient application for draft EISs (DEIS) with the Need and Use of the Information: The a license. The prospective exclusive information serves as an objective Environmental Protection Agency and license will be royalty-bearing and will make them available for public measure of program operations at the comply with the terms and conditions state level and is essential to the comment in January of 1998. The of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The Agency expects to file the final EISs in determination of a state agency's prospective exclusive license may be entitlement to an increased federal share December of 1998. Comments granted unless, within ninety days from concerning the scope of the analysis of its administrative costs or liability for the date of this published Notice, ARS sanctions. should be received by December 2, receives written evidence and argument 1996. Description of Respondents: State, which establishes that the grant of the ADDRESSES: Submit written comments Local or Tribal Government; Individuals license would not be consistent with the to Forest Supervisors of the appropriate or households; Federal Government. requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 Forest at the following addresses: Number of Respondents: 35,132. CFR 404.7. National Forests in Alabama, 946 Frequency of Responses: R.M. Parry, Jr., Recordkeeping; Reporting: Monthly; Chestnut, Montgomery, AL 36107± Assistant Administrator. Annually. 3010 Total Burden Hours: 107,135. [FR Doc. 96±19519 Filed 7±31±96; 8:45 am] Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forests, Donald E. Hulcher, BILLING CODE 3410±03±M 508 Oak Street, NW, Gainesville, GA 30501 Deputy Departmental Clearance Officer. Cherokee National Forest, 2800 N. [FR Doc. 96±19552 Filed 7±31±96; 8:45 am] Forest Service Ocoee Street (P.O. Box 2010), BILLING CODE 3410±01±M Cleveland, TN 37320±2010 Revised Land and Resource Jefferson National Forest, 5162 Management Plans for the National Valleypointe Parkway, Roanoke, VA Agricultural Research Service Forests in Alabama, Chattahoochee/ 24019 Oconee National Forests, Cherokee Sumter National Forest, 4931 Broad Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive National Forest, Jefferson National River Road, Columbia, SC 29210± License Forest, and the Sumter National Forest 4021 AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: USDA National Forests in Alabama: Planning ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare Team LeaderÐRick MorganÐphone: ACTION: Notice of availability and intent Environmental Impact Statements to grant exclusive license. (334) 832±4470 (NOI). Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forests: Planning Staff OfficerÐCaren SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a SUMMARY: Pursuant to 36 CFR 219.10(g), Federally owned cultivar of centipede BriscoÐphone: (770) 536±0541 the Regional Forester for the Southern Cherokee National Forest: Planning Staff grass, ``TifBlair,'' is available for Region gives notice of the agency's licensing and that the United States OfficerÐKeith SandiferÐphone: (615) intent to prepare Environmental Impact 476±9700 Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Statements (EIS) for the revisions of the Research Service, intends to grant an Jefferson National Forest: Planning Staff Forest Land and Resource Management OfficerÐKenneth LandgrafÐphone: exclusive license to the University of Plans (Forest Plans) for the above named Georgia Research Foundation. (540) 265±5100 National Forests. For the Jefferson Sumter National Forest: Planning Team Application for a Plant Variety National Forest, this notice revises their LeaderÐTony WhiteÐphone: (803) Protection Certificate for this cultivar June 28, 1993 notice of intent to prepare 561±4000 has been filed with the Plant Variety an EIS to revise their Forest Plan. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: The Regional Protection Office in the United States According to 36 CFR 219.10(g), forest Department of Agriculture. Forester for the Southern Region located plans are ordinarily revised on a 10±15 at 1720 Peachtree Road, NW, Atlanta, DATES: Comments must be received on year cycle. Several amendments have Georgia 30367, is the responsible or before October 30, 1996. been made to each plan since it official. ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA- originated. The existing forest plans ARS-Office of Technology Transfer, were approved on the following dates: Affected Counties Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, National Forests in Alabama; March 10, This Notice of Intent affects the Baltimore Boulevard, Building 005, 1986 following Counties: 40184 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 149 / Thursday, August 1, 1996 / Notices National Forests in Alabama: Bibb, consolidate and integrate ecological larger-scale analysis in the Southern Calhoun, Cherokee, Chilton, Clay, information for the Chattooga River Appalachian Assessment. Cleburne, Dallas, Hale, Perry, Talladega, Watershed which is located at the The Assessment supports the revision Tuscaloosa, Franklin, Lawrence, junction of North Carolina, South of the LRMPs by describing how the Winston, Covington, Escambia, and Carolina, and Georgia; and includes lands, resources, people and Macon; Alabama. three National Forests. management of the National Forests Chattahoochee-Oconee National Information from these analyses that interrelate within the larger context of Forests: Banks, Catoosa, Chattooga, cross State boundaries and involve the Southern Appalachian area. The Dawson, Fannin, Floyd, Gilmer, multiple National Forests, along with SAA, however, is not a ``decision Gordon, Habersham, Lumpkin, Murray, the individual National Forests efforts to document'' and it did not involve the Rabun, Stephens, Towns, Union, update their `'analysis of the National Environmental Policy Act Walker, White, Whitfield, Green, Jasper, management situation'' (AMS), are now (NEPA) process. As broad-scale issues Jones, Monroe, Morgan, Oconee, being used by these National Forests to were identified at the sub-regional level Oglethorpe, and Putnam: Georgia. determine what decisions in their Land (Southern Appalachian Mountain area) Cherokee National Forest: Polk, and Resource Management Plans in the Assessment, the individual McMinn, Monroe, Greene, Cocke, (LRMP) should be re-analyzed or National Forest's role in resolving these Unicoi, Sullivan, Washington, Johnson, changed in revising their LRMPs. broad-scale issues becomes a part of the and Carter; Tennessee. ``need for change'' at the Forest level. 2. The Southern Appalachian Jefferson National Forest: Letcher and Public involvement has been Assessment Pike; KentuckyÐMonroe; West important throughout both of these VirginiaÐBedford, Bland, Botetourt, Recently the U.S. Forest Service has processes. Continuing public Carroll, Craig, Dickenson, Giles, participated in the preparation of the involvement leading to formulation of Grayson, Lee, Montgomery, Pulaski, Southern Appalachian Assessment alternatives for the forest plan revision Roanoke, Rockbridge, Scott, Smyth, (SAA). The Assessment culminated in a analysis efforts will now be conducted Tazewell, Washington, Wise, and final Summary Report and four through the ``scoping'' period that Wythe; Virginia. Technical Reports that are now follows the issuance of this Notice of Sumter National Forest: Abbeville, available to the public. It was prepared Intent. Chester, Edgefield, Fairfield, by the U.S. Forest Service (the Southern 3. The Beginning of the Forest Plan Greenwood, Laurens, McCormick, Region of the National Forest System and the Southern Forest Experiment Revision Efforts for the National Forests Newberry, Oconee, Saluda, and Union; in Alabama, the Chattahoochee-Oconee, South Carolina. Station) in cooperation with the other Federal and state agencies that are the Cherokee, and the Sumter National SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: members of SAMBA (Southern Forests A. Background Information Appalachian Man and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Apalachicola & Conecuh National Forests
    Apalachicola & Conecuh National Forests Recreation Realignment Report Prepared by: Christine Overdevest & H. Ken Cordell August, 2001 Web Series: SRS-4901-2001-4 Web Series: SRS-4901-2001-4 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................. 1 Report Objectives ............................................................ 1 On Analysis Assumptions ...................................................... 1 Vision of Interactive Session: How to Use this Report .................................. 2 Report Contents .............................................................. 3 The Realignment Context ....................................................... 4 Recreation Realignment Step 1. - Population Analysis ................................................... 6 Step 2. - Recreation Participation Analysis and Segmentation of Activities ................. 11 Step 3. - Analysis of Fastest Growing Outdoor Recreation Activities ..................... 16 Step 4. - Recreation Participation Analysis by Demographic Strata ....................... 17 Step 5. - Summing Step 4 Activity Scores Across Demographic Strata ................... 40 Step 6. - Summing Activity Scores Over 3 Dimensions of Demand ....................... 41 Step 7. - Identifying Niche Activities ............................................. 43 Step 8. - Equity Analysis ..................................................... 44 Step 9. - Other Suppliers of Outdoor Recreation in your Market Area ................... 47 Step 10 - Summary Observations,
    [Show full text]
  • Land Areas of the National Forest System, As of September 30, 2019
    United States Department of Agriculture Land Areas of the National Forest System As of September 30, 2019 Forest Service WO Lands FS-383 November 2019 Metric Equivalents When you know: Multiply by: To fnd: Inches (in) 2.54 Centimeters Feet (ft) 0.305 Meters Miles (mi) 1.609 Kilometers Acres (ac) 0.405 Hectares Square feet (ft2) 0.0929 Square meters Yards (yd) 0.914 Meters Square miles (mi2) 2.59 Square kilometers Pounds (lb) 0.454 Kilograms United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Land Areas of the WO, Lands National Forest FS-383 System November 2019 As of September 30, 2019 Published by: USDA Forest Service 1400 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20250-0003 Website: https://www.fs.fed.us/land/staff/lar-index.shtml Cover Photo: Mt. Hood, Mt. Hood National Forest, Oregon Courtesy of: Susan Ruzicka USDA Forest Service WO Lands and Realty Management Statistics are current as of: 10/17/2019 The National Forest System (NFS) is comprised of: 154 National Forests 58 Purchase Units 20 National Grasslands 7 Land Utilization Projects 17 Research and Experimental Areas 28 Other Areas NFS lands are found in 43 States as well as Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. TOTAL NFS ACRES = 192,994,068 NFS lands are organized into: 9 Forest Service Regions 112 Administrative Forest or Forest-level units 503 Ranger District or District-level units The Forest Service administers 149 Wild and Scenic Rivers in 23 States and 456 National Wilderness Areas in 39 States. The Forest Service also administers several other types of nationally designated
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    00i-xvi_Mohl-East-00-FM 2/18/06 8:25 AM Page xv INTRODUCTION During the rapid development of the United States after the American Rev- olution, and during most of the 1900s, many forests in the United States were logged, with the logging often followed by devastating fires; ranchers converted the prairies and the plains into vast pastures for livestock; sheep were allowed to venture onto heretofore undisturbed alpine areas; and great amounts of land were turned over in an attempt to find gold, silver, and other minerals. In 1875, the American Forestry Association was born. This organization was asked by Secretary of the Interior Carl Schurz to try to change the con- cept that most people had about the wasting of our natural resources. One year later, the Division of Forestry was created within the Department of Agriculture. However, land fraud continued, with homesteaders asked by large lumber companies to buy land and then transfer the title of the land to the companies. In 1891, the American Forestry Association lobbied Con- gress to pass legislation that would allow forest reserves to be set aside and administered by the Department of the Interior, thus stopping wanton de- struction of forest lands. President Benjamin Harrison established forest re- serves totaling 13 million acres, the first being the Yellowstone Timberland Reserve, which later became the Shoshone and Teton national forests. Gifford Pinchot was the founder of scientific forestry in the United States, and President Theodore Roosevelt named him chief of the Forest Ser- vice in 1898 because of his wide-ranging policy on the conservation of nat- ural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Alabama's TREASURED Forests
    Alabama’s TREASURED Forests A Publication of the Alabama Forestry Commission Summer 2011 Message from the STATE FORESTER n the heels of the devastation caused by the tornados this Governor Robert Bentley past April, a good portion of our state is in the process of Alabama Forestry Commission Orebuilding, restoring, even re-establishing Kenneth Real, Chairman roots in some cases. In this issue of Johnny McReynolds, Vice Chairman Alabama’s TREASURED Forests, we’re C. Irvin Eatman, Jr. highlighting recovery efforts and how the Randy Gilmore planting of trees can bring beauty, heal- Don Heath ing, and hope following such a horrific Melisa Love event. Jerry M. Smith It seems rather ironic that at this par- ticular time I should bring an issue to State Forester your attention that could result in signifi- Linda S. Casey cant increases in your reforestation costs. As State Forester and in keeping with the mission of the Alabama Forestry Commission, I need to make Assistant State Forester landowners, forestry service providers, forest industry, and other forest- Patrick Glass land stakeholders aware of certain upcoming U.S. Department of Labor rules that will impact the ability of landowners and others to cost-effec- Administrative Division Director tively reforest their property. Walter Cartwright The Department of Labor’s regulations change the methodology for calculating the prevailing wages paid H-2B “guest workers” and will Forest Operations Division Director result in reforestation cost increases of between 26 to 104 percent in Dan Jackson
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1. Property Ids and Names (Sorted by Name)
    Appendix 1. Property IDs and Names (sorted by name) Property Name Property ID State Alexander State Forest AXSF LA Alligator River National Wildlife Refuge ARNWR NC Angelina Ranger District, Angelina National Forest ANRDANF TX Apalachicola Ranger District, Apalachicola National Forest ARDANF FL Avalon Plantation AVPL FL Avon Park Air Force Range APAFR FL Bates Hill Plantation BHPL SC Bienville Ranger District, Bienville National Forest BRDBNF MS Big Branch Marsh National Wildlife Refuge BBMNWR LA Big Cypress National Preserve BCNP FL Black Bayou Lake NWR BBLNWR LA Blackwater River State Forest BRSF FL Bladen Lakes State Forest BLSF NC Blue Tract BT NC Brookgreen Gardens BG SC Brushy Creek Experimental Forest IPBCEF TX Bull Creek & Triple N Ranch Wildlife Management Areas BCWMA FL Burroughs & Chapin Company, Grand Dunes BCCGD SC Burroughs & Chapin Company, Horry County BCCHC SC Camp Blanding CB FL Camp Mackall CM NC Carolina Sandhills National Wildlife Refuge CSNWR SC Catahoula Ranger District, Kisatchie National Forest CRDKNF LA Cheraw State Fish Hatchery CSFH SC Cheraw State Park CSP SC Chickasawhay Ranger District, DeSoto National Forest CRDDNF MS Conecuh National Forest CNF AL Cooks Branch Conservancy CBC TX Croatan Ranger District, Croatan National Forest CRDCNF NC Crosett Experimental Forest CEF AR Cumberland County Private Lands CCPL NC D'Arbonne National Wildlife Refuge DNWR LA Dare County Bombing Range DCBR NC Davy Crockett National Forest DCNF TX Desoto Ranger District, Desoto National Forest DRDDNF MS Dupuis Wildllife and Environmental Area DWEA FL Eglin Air Force Base EAFB FL Enon and Sehoy Plantation ESPL AL Escape Ranch ERANCH FL Evangeline Unit, Calcasieu RD, Kisatchie National Forest EUCRDKNF LA Fairchild State Forest FSF TX Felsenthal National Wildlife Refuge FNWR AR Fort Benning FTBN GA Fort Bragg FTBG NC Fort Gordon FTGD GA Fort Jackson FTJK SC Fort Polk FTPK LA Fort Stewart FTST GA Francis Marion National Forest FMNF SC Fred C.
    [Show full text]
  • At-Risk Species Assessment on Southern National Forests, Refuges, and Other Protected Areas
    David Moynahan | St. Marks NWR At-Risk Species Assessment on Southern National Forests, Refuges, and Other Protected Areas National Wildlife Refuge Association Mark Sowers, Editor October 2017 1001 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 905, Washington, DC 20036 • 202-417-3803 • www.refugeassociation.org At-Risk Species Assessment on Southern National Forests, Refuges, and Other Protected Areas Table of Contents Introduction and Methods ................................................................................................3 Results and Discussion ......................................................................................................9 Suites of Species: Occurrences and Habitat Management ...........................................12 Progress and Next Steps .................................................................................................13 Appendix I: Suites of Species ..........................................................................................17 Florida Panhandle ............................................................................................................................18 Peninsular Florida .............................................................................................................................28 Southern Blue Ridge and Southern Ridge and Valley ...............................................................................................................................39 Interior Low Plateau and Cumberland Plateau, Central Ridge and Valley ...............................................................................................46
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of GATWS 1973-2010
    HISTORY of the GEORGIA CHAPTER OF THE WILDLIFE SOCIETY Established April 30, 1973 Semi-Annual Programs, Other Accomplishments, & Boards & Committees • MISSION: The Georgia Chapter of The Wildlife Society (Georgia TWS) is a professional organization dedicated to the scientific conservation of wildlife resources, and to furthering the education of those involved with, or interested in, wildlife conservation. Georgia TWS promotes rigorous professional ethics for wildlife scientists and managers, facilitates the exchange of technical information, and works to influence legislation impacting wildlife resources. Issue statements are developed, often in partnership with other conservation groups, and relayed to elected representatives of the Georgia and United States Constitutions and other people. • MEMBERSHIP: Georgia TWS has recently comprised of over 200 members representing universities, state, and federal agencies, conservation organizations, and the general public. Some members are involved with wildlife management in a professional capacity, while others are involved simply because of their interest in wild animals and the management of these species and their habitats. The Chapter officers function as the Executive Committee, and most of the organization's business is conducted via that body, with input from the general membership. However, there are numerous opportunities for non-elected members to contribute to the Chapter. • MEETINGS: Georgia TWS meets twice per year, spring and fall, in various locations around the state. Occasionally we meet jointly with other state chapters or other organizations. Meetings generally span two days, and feature presentations detailing current issues in wildlife research, management, and legislation. The meetings also address Chapter business, and a new crop of officers is elected at the spring meeting every two years.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2017 to 06/30/2017 National Forests in Alabama This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2017 to 06/30/2017 National Forests in Alabama This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact National Forests in Alabama, Occurring in more than one District (excluding Forestwide) R8 - Southern Region Talladega Division New - Vegetation management In Progress: Expected:06/2017 06/2017 Scott Layfield Prescribed Burn Units (other than forest products) Comment Period Public Notice 256-362-2909 Environmental Assessment - Fuels management 07/03/2014 [email protected] EA Description: Addition of 9900 acres to its prescribed burning program for fuel reduction, ecosystem restoration and wildlife habitat improvement Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=45542 Location: UNIT - Talladega Ranger District, Shoal Creek Ranger District. STATE - Alabama. COUNTY - Cherokee, Clay, Cleburne, Talladega. LEGAL - Not Applicable. A total of 10 new burn unit as show on associated maps. National Forests in Alabama Bankhead Ranger District (excluding Projects occurring in more than one District) R8 - Southern Region Special Use Permit - Reggie - Special use management On Hold N/A N/A Mike Cook Watts Right-of-way 205-489-5111 CE [email protected] Description: Issue a special use permit for right-of-way to Reggie Watts for driveway and utility installation to private property. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=40043 Location: UNIT - Bankhead Ranger District. STATE - Alabama. COUNTY - Winston. LEGAL - Section 23, T10S, R7W. Bankhead National Forest, Horseshoe Bend Area, Houston, Alabama, FS Road 123D1 and unnamed woods road.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 6 - NFS Acreage by State, Congressional District and County
    Table 6 - NFS Acreage by State, Congressional District and County State Congressional District County Unit NFS Acreage Alabama 1st Escambia Conecuh National Forest 29,179 1st Totals 29,179 2nd Coffee Pea River Land Utilization Project 40 Covington Conecuh National Forest 54,881 2nd Totals 54,921 3rd Calhoun Rose Purchase Unit 161 Talladega National Forest 21,412 Cherokee Talladega National Forest 2,229 Clay Talladega National Forest 66,763 Cleburne Talladega National Forest 98,750 Macon Tuskegee National Forest 11,348 Talladega Talladega National Forest 46,272 3rd Totals 246,935 4th Franklin William B. Bankhead National Forest 1,277 Lawrence William B. Bankhead National Forest 90,681 Winston William B. Bankhead National Forest 90,030 4th Totals 181,988 6th Bibb Talladega National Forest 60,867 Chilton Talladega National Forest 22,986 6th Totals 83,853 2018 Land Areas Report Refresh Date: 10/13/2018 Table 6 - NFS Acreage by State, Congressional District and County State Congressional District County Unit NFS Acreage 7th Dallas Talladega National Forest 2,167 Hale Talladega National Forest 28,051 Perry Talladega National Forest 32,796 Tuscaloosa Talladega National Forest 10,998 7th Totals 74,012 Alabama Totals 670,888 Alaska At Large Anchorage Municipality Chugach National Forest 248,417 Haines Borough Tongass National Forest 767,952 Hoonah-Angoon Census Area Tongass National Forest 1,974,292 Juneau City and Borough Tongass National Forest 1,672,846 Kenai Peninsula Borough Chugach National Forest 1,261,067 Ketchikan Gateway Borough Tongass
    [Show full text]
  • Land Areas Report Refresh Date: 10/17/2020 Table 6 - NFS Acreage by State, Congressional District and County
    Table 6 - NFS Acreage by State, Congressional District and County State Congressional District County Unit NFS Acreage Alabama 1st Escambia Conecuh National Forest 29,179 1st Totals 29,179 2nd Coffee Pea River Land Utilization Project 40 Covington Conecuh National Forest 54,887 2nd Totals 54,927 3rd Calhoun Rose Purchase Unit 161 Talladega National Forest 21,412 Cherokee Talladega National Forest 2,229 Clay Talladega National Forest 66,763 Cleburne Talladega National Forest 98,749 Macon Tuskegee National Forest 11,348 Talladega Talladega National Forest 46,272 3rd Totals 246,934 4th Franklin William B. Bankhead National Forest 1,277 Lawrence William B. Bankhead National Forest 90,681 Winston William B. Bankhead National Forest 90,030 4th Totals 181,987 6th Bibb Talladega National Forest 60,983 Chilton Talladega National Forest 23,821 6th Totals 84,804 2020 Land Areas Report Refresh Date: 10/17/2020 Table 6 - NFS Acreage by State, Congressional District and County State Congressional District County Unit NFS Acreage 7th Dallas Talladega National Forest 2,167 Hale Talladega National Forest 28,051 Perry Talladega National Forest 32,738 Tuscaloosa Talladega National Forest 10,998 7th Totals 73,954 Alabama Totals 671,786 Alaska At Large Anchorage Municipality Chugach National Forest 248,417 Haines Borough Tongass National Forest 767,860 Hoonah-Angoon Census Area Tongass National Forest 1,979,060 Juneau City and Borough Tongass National Forest 1,672,684 Kenai Peninsula Borough Chugach National Forest 1,261,065 Ketchikan Gateway Borough Tongass
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of Effects for Federally Listed Species Are: 1) No Effect; 2) May Affect, but Not Likely to Adversely Affect; 3) May Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect
    BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF PROPOSED, THREATENED & ENDANGERED SPECIES Longleaf Restoration Project Tuskegee National Forest Macon County, Alabama INTRODUCTION: This Biological Assessment (BA) addresses the effects of the following management activities on Proposed, Endangered and Threatened species on the Tuskegee National Forest. The project proposal is a longleaf restoration project, to cover approximately total of 1,173 acres of treatment. A Biological Assessment, to be used in conjunction with formal consultation, is required of all proposed U.S Forest Service (Forest Service) management actions pertaining to the potential effects on Proposed, Threatened and Endangered (T&E) species. According to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, the effects of all proposed actions must be analyzed regarding Federally listed, or proposed species as well as designated critical habitat. The Tuskegee National Forest proposes to restore approximately 796 acres to longleaf pine by clearcutting with reserves, commercially thin approximately 377 acres of upland pines for an approximately total of 1,173 acres of treatment over the next 5 years. Site preparation may consist of a combination of herbicides; prescribed fire and /or mechanical means such as roller drum chopping, chainsaws or brush-cutters. In addition, treatment of non-native invasive species and prescribed burning activities will be initiated and conducted. The project areas are located in compartments 4, 5, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, and 18 within the Tuskegee Ranger District, National Forests in Alabama, in Macon County Alabama. This action is needed, because it will improve the long-term health of the Tuskegee National Forest and will implement the National Forests in Alabama Land and Revised Resource Management Plan (RLRMP or LMRP) forest-wide goals, objectives and standards, the national Healthy Forest Initiative and the Healthy Forest Restoration Act.
    [Show full text]
  • HR 5279 IH 3 Sec
    I 107TH CONGRESS 2D SESSION H. R. 5279 To amend the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of 1974 and related laws to strengthen the protection of native biodiver- sity and ban clearcutting on Federal lands, to designate certain Federal lands as Ancient Forests, Roadless Areas, Watershed Protection Areas, and Special Areas where logging and other intrusive activities are prohib- ited, and for other purposes. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES JULY 26, 2002 Ms. ESHOO (for herself, Mr. SIMMONS, Mrs. MALONEY of New York, Ms. SANCHEZ, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. BORSKI, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Ms. WOOLSEY, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. FILNER, Mr. PASCRELL, Ms. PELOSI, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. HALL of Ohio, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Ms. MCCARTHY of Missouri, Mr. KLECZKA, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. DELAHUNT, Mr. HOLT, Mr. OLVER, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. MOORE, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. BLAGOJEVICH, Mr. FORD, Ms. LOFGREN, Ms. SOLIS, Mr. ROTHMAN, Mr. WEXLER, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mrs. MEEK of Florida, Ms. RIVERS, Mr. EVANS, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. BONIOR, Mr. CLAY, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. FARR of California, Mr. CONYERS, Ms. BALDWIN, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. WEINER, Ms. WA- TERS, Mrs. LOWEY, Ms. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. REYES, Mr. PALLONE, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Mr. FRANK, Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. SHERMAN, Mrs. MINK of Hawaii, Mr. MALONEY of Connecticut, Mr. SHAYS, Ms. LEE, Mr. LUTHER, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD, Mrs.
    [Show full text]