DOCSLIB.ORG

Monarch (Danaus Plexippus Plexippus) on Dahlia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Monarch (Danaus Plexippus Plexippus) on Dahlia Monarch (Danaus plexippus plexippus) on dahlia. Photograph by Sally Phillips. Support the Trust Welcome to the first calendar profiling some of New Zealand’s fascinating butterflies and moths. • The Monarch Butterfly NZ Trust is a registered not-for-profit charitable trust with donee status, relying on donations, membership subscriptions, grants and When the Monarch Butterfly NZ Trust was formed it soon became obvious that most New Zealanders bequests to carry out our vital work for the conservation of NZ’s butterflies, know little about our Lepidoptera species. Many people could name only two butterflies: the moths and their habitat. (Registered Charity CC11297, IRD No. is 91 118 254). Monarch and the Cabbage White, but knowledge about other species, or in fact the life cycle of the • It is through the support and generosity of members and supporters that we Monarch, was not common knowledge. can continue working in the field of environmental education, conservation As we set about creating awareness and education we considered changing the name of our and protection. charitable trust to cover other species. But the Monarch is a universal favourite. No-one would be • The MBNZT has about 600 financial members supporting our organisation. interested in the Cabbage White, and few people are interested in other species... until they begin By joining us you will get the opportunity to learn more about NZ’s unique to learn more about the Monarch. A love for the Monarch creates an interest in biodiversity. butterflies and moths and take part in our conservation projects. • Our shop has a range of gift items and products, such as seeds, posters, We are at first horrified of the deeds of predators and parasites. But a female Monarch will lay brooches etc we sell to raise funds – check out our website. hundreds of eggs – one laid over a thousand – and if every egg was to make it to maturity the world • Become a regular gift-giver, helping fund our work. You can join for as little as would be over-run by Monarchs. Even though the chemicals the caterpillars ingest from the milkweed $240 per year ($20 a month minimum donation). In return you will receive (e.g. swan plant) make them nasty to eat, some will become lunch for praying mantises or wasps. complimentary membership of the MBNZT, a certificate, quarterly newsletters, We curse the arrival of the wasp invaders, insects that have proven to be of no benefit to our wildlife email news updates, invitations to events and our annual report and audited or economy. We learn the difference between the South African and the native praying mantis and accounts. realise it is the South African species that is doing so much damage to our butterfly species. A great • Corporate sponsorship: your company will be linked with a responsible lesson in biosecurity, why protecting our borders is essential. organisation not only involved in environmental education but building relationships with all New Zealanders, whatever their gender, age, ethnicity In our gardens we realise one swan plant is not enough and we strive for balance. We don’t want or socio-economic background. You will be demonstrating your environmental our Monarch caterpillars to starve, but neither do we want gardens over-run with milkweed. commitment – hugely important in our hearts, minds and lives. As well your Everything in balance. company will benefit from the exposure to our fast-growing membership through our high-quality newsletter, website and printed information. So the Monarch becomes our ambassador, an ambassador for the rest of the insect species, Whether your organisation is looking for national sponsorship or support at for biodiversity, for biosecurity, for nature. a regional or local level, we can design a package to suit. Learning about biodiversity in our backyards is fascinating. Our children may learn about kiwi • Individual gifts: You may wish to leave us a gift in your will (or bequest), and kauri, penguins and marine mammals, but unless they are very lucky there is little they can a lasting legacy ensuring that the protection of our unique butterflies and moths can continue on your behalf and for future generations. Or you do for them right in their gardens. There are many things people can do for our butterfly (and moth) can leave a gift in perpetuity to the Endowment Fund, the NZ Lepidoptera species, right in their own backyard. And working with the Monarch is a beginning. Fund – a gift that keeps on giving. When the sum in the fund has built to We hope that you will find our calendar a useful tool and relish in the superb pictures and facts a certain level, it will be invested as capital and left to build each year forever. The MBNZT will be able to use a portion of the generated interest each year presented for you. Thank you for your support. to fund its work. Trustees and members • Whether you are a business or an individual, there are tax advantages in Monarch Butterfly NZ Trust donating to the MBNZT. January 2011 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday New Year’s Day The difference between butterflies and moths. Lepidoptera is the term for butterflies and moths. NZ has a higher rate of endemic 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 Lepidoptera species than anywhere else in the world. Endemic species are ones that occur in a particular area and nowhere else on Earth. Endemism accounts for 92% of NZ’s Lepidoptera which lists at least 23 species 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 of butterfly and more than 1700 moths. The most reliable way of distinguishing a moth from a butterfly in NZ is that moths have feathery, sometimes pointed, antennae (feelers) but butterflies have clubbed antennae which terminate with 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 an expanded knob. Southland Anniversary Butterflies are generally diurnal (day flying) and moths nocturnal (night flying) although we have a number of day flying moths in NZ. The magpie moth and Cinnabar moth are two that are depicted in this calendar. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 A third distinction is that generally Wellington Anniversary butterflies settle with wings together over their back like a yacht’s sail (exposing the undersides), whereas moths’ wings tend to lie flat over the body like a tent (with the upper side of the forewing visible). 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Auckland Anniversary Nelson Anniversary 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 Common Copper (Lycaena salustius) on heliotrope. Photograph by Rob Herd. February 2011 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Common copper Lycaena salustius (Maori) Pepe Para Riki 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 The most abundant of our four copper butterflies, the habitat of this active Waitangi Day little endemic butterfly ranges from sand dunes to subalpine tussock country. It can be seen from November to April. The eggs are laid on three species 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 of Muehlenbeckia and the resulting caterpillar is rather unusual in that it looks more like a velvety green slug, the legs being obscured by the fleshy flanges that overhang the body. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 The pupae can be found among the dead leaf litter beneath the food plant, and the adult butterfly emerges after eighteen days or so, living a short life of about two weeks. A number of varying forms have been 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 recognised throughout different regions. 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Cinnabar moth (Tyrea jacobaeae). Photograph by Brian Clegg. March 2011 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Cinnabar moth Tyria jacobaeae Introduced into this country in 1929 in an attempt to control ragwort this striking 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 moth, sometimes taken to be a butterfly, was bred in huge quantities in England and released over much of New Zealand. However, it failed to spread. Efforts to re-establish it in the 1980s were 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 more successful and it is now found over Taranaki Anniversary much of the North Island and the north of the South Island. The colourful black and orange striped caterpillars feed ravenously on the leaves and flowers of the ragwort plant, making 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 the caterpillar and moth poisonous to Otago Anniversary most birds. The mature caterpillar reaches a size of about 30mm before pupating some distance from the plant and close to 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 the ground in a sheltered crevice or under bark. 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Boulder Copper (Boldenaria boldenarum). Photograph by Mike Lusk. April 2011 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Boulder Copper Boldenaria boldenarum This little butterfly, the smallest of our coppers, frequents riverbeds, stream 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 edges and shingle beds along tracks. It is often overlooked because of its small size and its habit of flying close to the ground. Sunning itself on stones or shingle, from which it absorbs heat, 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 the male shimmers with an iridescent End of School Term 1 purple hue, while the female has a more coppery colour. When folded, the butterflies’ wings match the stony habitat perfectly, making it almost invisible. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 The butterfly lays its eggs on Good Friday Muehlenbeckia species and the caterpillars feed on the leaves as well as being partial to the flowers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Entomology of the Aucklands and Other Islands South of New Zealand: Lepidoptera, Ex­ Cluding Non-Crambine Pyralidae
    Pacific Insects Monograph 27: 55-172 10 November 1971 ENTOMOLOGY OF THE AUCKLANDS AND OTHER ISLANDS SOUTH OF NEW ZEALAND: LEPIDOPTERA, EX­ CLUDING NON-CRAMBINE PYRALIDAE By J. S. Dugdale1 CONTENTS Introduction 55 Acknowledgements 58 Faunal Composition and Relationships 58 Faunal List 59 Key to Families 68 1. Arctiidae 71 2. Carposinidae 73 Coleophoridae 76 Cosmopterygidae 77 3. Crambinae (pt Pyralidae) 77 4. Elachistidae 79 5. Geometridae 89 Hyponomeutidae 115 6. Nepticulidae 115 7. Noctuidae 117 8. Oecophoridae 131 9. Psychidae 137 10. Pterophoridae 145 11. Tineidae... 148 12. Tortricidae 156 References 169 Note 172 Abstract: This paper deals with all Lepidoptera, excluding the non-crambine Pyralidae, of Auckland, Campbell, Antipodes and Snares Is. The native resident fauna of these islands consists of 42 species of which 21 (50%) are endemic, in 27 genera, of which 3 (11%) are endemic, in 12 families. The endemic fauna is characterised by brachyptery (66%), body size under 10 mm (72%) and concealed, or strictly ground- dwelling larval life. All species can be related to mainland forms; there is a distinctive pre-Pleistocene element as well as some instances of possible Pleistocene introductions, as suggested by the presence of pairs of species, one member of which is endemic but fully winged. A graph and tables are given showing the composition of the fauna, its distribution, habits, and presumed derivations. Host plants or host niches are discussed. An additional 7 species are considered to be non-resident waifs. The taxonomic part includes keys to families (applicable only to the subantarctic fauna), and to genera and species.
    [Show full text]
  • Protection of Pandora Moth (Coloradia Pandora Blake) Eggs from Consumption by Golden-Mantled Ground Squirrels (Spermophilus Lateralis Say)
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Elizabeth Ann Gerson for the degree of Master of Science in Forest Science presented on 10 January, 1995. Title: Protection of Pandora Moth (Coloradia pandora Blake) Eggs From Consumption by Golden-mantled Ground Squirrels (Spermophilus lateralis Say) Abstract approved: Redacted for Privacy William C. McComb Endemic populations of pandora moths (Coloradia pandora Blake), a defoliator of western pine forests, proliferated to epidemic levels in central Oregon in 1986 and increased dramatically through 1994. Golden-mantled ground squirrels (Spermophilus lateralis Say) consume adult pandora moths, but reject nutritionally valuable eggs from gravid females. Feeding trials with captive S. lateralis were conducted to identify the mode of egg protection. Chemical constituents of fertilized eggs were separated through a polarity gradient of solvent extractions. Consumption of the resulting hexane, dichloromethane, and water egg fractions, and the extracted egg tissue residue, was evaluated by randomized 2-choice feeding tests. Consumption of four physically distinct egg fractions (whole eggs, "whole" egg shells, ground egg shells, and egg contents) also was evaluated. These bioassays indicated that C. pandora eggs are not protected chemically, however, the egg shell does inhibit S. lateralis consumption. Egg protection is one mechanism that enables C. pandora to persist within the forest food web. Spermophilus lateralis, a common and often abundant rodent of central Oregon pine forests, is a natural enemy of C. pandora
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER• of the MICHIGAN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    NEWSLETTER• of the MICHIGAN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY Volume 38, Numbers 4 December, 1993 Impacts ofBt on Non-Target Lepidoptera John W. Peacock, David L. Wagner, and Dale F. Schweitzer USDA Forest Service, Hamden, CT; University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT; and The Nature Conservancy, Port Norris, NT, respectively Introduction gypsy moth in Oregon. Sample et a1. ing attempts bycertain birds. In another (1 993) have likewise reported a signifi­ study, Bellocq et al. (1992) showed that Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner var. cant reduction inspecies abundance and the use of Btk increased immigration kurstaki (Btk) is one of the pesticides richness in non-target Lepidoptera in rates andcaused d ietary shifts inshrews. most commonly employed against lepi­ field studies in eastern West Virginia. We report here a summary of our dopteran forest pests. In the eastern U.S., James et al. (1993) haveshown thatBtk is studies aimed at determining the effect where millionsofhectares of deciduous toxic to late, but not early, instar larvae of Btko n non-target Lepidoptera inboth forest have been defoliated by the ''Eu­ of the beneficial cinnabar moth, Tyria laboratoryand field studies. Laboratory ropean" gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar jacobaeae (L.). bioassays were conducted on larvae in (L.), Btk has been used extenSively to In addition to its direct effects on seven families of native eastern U.S. slow the spread of this pest and to re­ native Lepidoptera, Btk can indirectly Macrolepidoptera. Field studies were duce defoliation. In 1992 alone, over affect other animals that rely on lepi­ carried out in Rockbridge County, Vir­ 300,000 ha were treated with Btk, in­ dopterous larvae as a primary source of ginia, and were the first to evaluate non­ cluding gypsy moth suppression activi­ food.
    [Show full text]
  • The Radiation of Satyrini Butterflies (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae): A
    Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2011, 161, 64–87. With 8 figures The radiation of Satyrini butterflies (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae): a challenge for phylogenetic methods CARLOS PEÑA1,2*, SÖREN NYLIN1 and NIKLAS WAHLBERG1,3 1Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 2Museo de Historia Natural, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Av. Arenales 1256, Apartado 14-0434, Lima-14, Peru 3Laboratory of Genetics, Department of Biology, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland Received 24 February 2009; accepted for publication 1 September 2009 We have inferred the most comprehensive phylogenetic hypothesis to date of butterflies in the tribe Satyrini. In order to obtain a hypothesis of relationships, we used maximum parsimony and model-based methods with 4435 bp of DNA sequences from mitochondrial and nuclear genes for 179 taxa (130 genera and eight out-groups). We estimated dates of origin and diversification for major clades, and performed a biogeographic analysis using a dispersal–vicariance framework, in order to infer a scenario of the biogeographical history of the group. We found long-branch taxa that affected the accuracy of all three methods. Moreover, different methods produced incongruent phylogenies. We found that Satyrini appeared around 42 Mya in either the Neotropical or the Eastern Palaearctic, Oriental, and/or Indo-Australian regions, and underwent a quick radiation between 32 and 24 Mya, during which time most of its component subtribes originated. Several factors might have been important for the diversification of Satyrini: the ability to feed on grasses; early habitat shift into open, non-forest habitats; and geographic bridges, which permitted dispersal over marine barriers, enabling the geographic expansions of ancestors to new environ- ments that provided opportunities for geographic differentiation, and diversification.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 © Australian Museum. This Material May Not Be Reproduced, Distributed
    AMS564/002 – Scott sister’s second notebook, 1840-1862 © Australian Museum. This material may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used without permission from the Australian Museum. Text was transcribed by volunteers at the Biodiversity Volunteer Portal, a collaboration between the Australian Museum and the Atlas of Living Australia This is a formatted version of the transcript file from the second Scott Sisters’ notebook Page numbers in this document do not correspond to the notebook page numbers. The notebook was started from both ends at different times, so the transcript pages have been shuffled into approximately date order. Text in square brackets may indicate the following: - Misspellings, with the correct spelling in square brackets preceded by an asterisk rendersveu*[rendezvous] - Tags for types of content [newspaper cutting] - Spelled out abbreviations or short form words F[ield[. Nat[uralists] 1 AMS564/002 – Scott sister’s second notebook, 1840-1862 [Front cover] nulie(?) [start of page 130] [Scott Sisters’ page 169] Note Book No 2 Continued from first notebook No. 253. Larva (Noctua /Bombyx Festiva , Don n 2) found on the Crinum - 16 April 1840. Length 2 1/2 Incs. Ground color ^ very light blue, with numerous dark longitudinal stripes. 3 bright yellow bands, one on each side and one down the middle back - Head lightish red - a black velvet band, transverse, on the segment behind the front legs - but broken by the yellows This larva had a very offensive smell, and its habits were disgusting - living in the stem or in the thick part of the leaves near it, in considerable numbers, & surrounded by their accumulated filth - so that any touch of the Larva would soil the fingers.- It chiefly eat the thicker & juicier parts of the Crinum - On the 17 April made a very slight nest, underground, & some amongst the filth & leaves, by forming a cavity with agglutinated earth - This larva is showy - Drawing of exact size & appearance.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibition Catalogue Natural History Illustrations by Erin Forsyth, 2018
    A Few Exhibition catalogue Natural history illustrations by Erin Forsyth, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT THE WORKS 5 About the artist 7 How to use this catalogue 9 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE 10 Korimako, makomako, bellbird 13 Kākāriki, Red-crowned parakeet, (Cyanoramphus novaezelandiae) 15 Moko kākāriki, Auckland green gecko (Naultinus elegans) 17 Pekapeka-tou-roa, long-tailed bat (Chalinolobus tuberculatus) 19 Pekapeka-tou-roa, long-tailed bat (Chalinolobus tuberculatus) 21 Pekapeka-tou-roa, long-tailed bat (Chalinolobus tuberculatus) 23 Ngirungiru, miromiro, South Island tomtit (Petroica macrocephala macrocephala) male 25 Kakaruwai, South Island Robin (Petroica australis) 27 Tōrea pango, variable oystercatcher (Haematopus unicolor) 29 Kererū, NZ wood pigeon (Hemiphaga novaeseelandiae) 31 Kōtare, sacred kingfisher (Todiramphus sanctus) 33 Ruru, morepork (Ninox novaeseelandiae) 35 TŪī, parsons bird (Prosthemadera novaeseelandiae) 37 Kōkako, blue-wattled crow (Callaeas wilsoni) 41 Takahe, South Island Takahe (Porphyrio hochstetteri) 43 Tūturiwhatu, NZ Dotteral (Charadrius obscurus) 45 Whio, blue duck (Hymenolaimus malacorhynchos) 47 Kahukōwhai, yellow admiral (Vanessa itea) 49 Wētāpunga, Little Barrier (Hauturu-o-Toi) giant weta (Deinacrida heteracantha) 51 Kārearea, NZ falcon (Falco novaeseelandiae) 53 Common evening brown (Melanitis leda bankia) 55 Pepe pouri, Helms' butterfly or forest ringlet (Dodonidia helmsii) 59 Kahukōwhai, yellow admiral (Vanessa itea) & Kahukura, NZ red admiral (V. gonerilla gonerilla) 63 Pepe pouri, Butler's ringlet (Erebiola butleri) & pepe pouri, black mountain ringlet (Percnodaimon merula) 67 Pīwakawaka, fantail (Rhipidura fuliginosa) 73 Weka, woodhen (Gallirallus australis) 75 Carnivorous land snail (Powelliphanta superba) 77 MYRTACEAE Studies I & II (Diptych) 79 ABOUT THE WORKS These original works are from the exhibition ‘A Few’ - the third installment in an ongoing series of natural history illustrations depicting native and resident species of Aotearoa by Erin Forsyth.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuroscience Needs Ethology: the Marked Example of the Moth Pheromone System
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 16 July 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202007.0357.v1 Review Neuroscience needs ethology: the marked example of the moth pheromone system Hervé Thevenon 1 1 Affiliation: Spascia; [email protected] 2 Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The key premise of translational studies is that knowledge gained in one animal species can be transposed to other animals. So far translational bridges have mainly relied on genetic and physiological similarities, in experimental setups where behaviours and environment are often oversimplified. These simplifications were recently criticised for decreasing the intrinsic value of the published results. The inclusion of wild behaviour and rich environments in neuroscience experimental designs is difficult to achieve because no animal model has it all. As an example, the genetic toolkit of moths species is virtually non-existent when compared to C. elegans, rats, mice, or zebrafish, however the balance is reversed for wild behaviours. The ethological knowledge gathered about the moth was instrumental for designing natural-like auditory stimuli, that were used in association with electrophysiology in order to understand how moths use these variable sounds produced by their predators in order to trump death. Conversely, we are still stuck with understanding how male moths make sense of their complex and diffuse olfactory landscape in order to locate conspecific females up to several hundred meters away, and precisely identify a conspecific in a sympatric swarm in order to reproduce. This systemic review articulates the ethological knowledge pertaining to this unresolved problem and leverages the paradigm to gain insight into how male moths process sparse and uncertain environmental sensory information.
    [Show full text]
  • And Ragwort Flea Beetle, Cinnabar Moths and Other Organisms That Feed on Ragwort
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Interaction of population processes in ragwort (Senecio jacobaea L.) and ragwort flea.bee tle (Longitarsus jacobaeae Waterbouse) A Thesis presented in partial fulflllment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ecology at Massey University. April 2000 11 Declaration of Originality This thesis represents the original work of the author, except where otherwise acknowledged. It has not been submitted previously for a degree at any University. Aung Kyi III Acknowledgements I am sincerely grateful to my supervisors, Professor Brian Springett, Dr lan Stringer (Ecology, the Institute of Natural Resources, Massey University), and Dr Peter McGregor (Landcare Research) for their encouragement, supervision and patience over this study and their help in drafting this thesis. I am also indebted to Mr Keith Betteridge (AgResearch) for his valuable advice on the laboratory study on the movement of first instar larvae of ragwort flea beetle in different soils; Dr. Ed Minot (Ecology, Massey University) for explaining how to use the STELLA model; Dr. Jill Rapson (Ecology, Massey University) for comments on my PhD thesis proposal; Dr. Siva Ganesh, Dr. Jenny Brown and Mr. Duncan Hedderley (Statistics, Massey University) for help with univariate and multivariate analyses; and Dr. Kerry Harrington (Plant Science, Institute of Natural Resources, Massey University) for his comments and suggestion on the toxicity of ragwort and its chemical control.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Host Range Testing for Cotesia Urabae
    1 Appendix 2 Appendix 2: Risks to non-target species from potential biological control agent Cotesia urabae against Uraba lugens in New Zealand L.A. Berndt, A. Sharpe, T.M. Withers, M. Kimberley, and B. Gresham Scion, Private Bag 3020, Rotorua 3046, New Zealand, [email protected] Introduction Biological control of insect pests is a sustainable approach to pest management that seeks to correct ecological imbalances that many new invaders create on arrival in a new country. This is done by introducing carefully selected natural enemies of the pest, usually from its native range. This method is the only means of establishing and maintaining self-sustaining control of pest insects and it is highly cost effective in the long term (Greathead, 1995). However there is considerable concern for the risk new biological control agents might pose to other species in the country of introduction, and most countries now have regulations to manage decisions on whether to allow biological control introductions (Sheppard et al., 2003). A key component of the research required to gain approval to release a new agent is host range testing, to determine what level of risk the agent might pose to native and valued species in the country of introduction. Although methods for this are well developed for weed biological control, protocols are less established for arthropod biological control, and the challenges in conducting tests are greater (Van Driesche and Murray, 2004; van Lenteren et al., 2006; Withers and Browne, 2004). This is because insect ecology and taxonomy are relatively poorly understood, and there are many more species that need to be considered.
    [Show full text]
  • A Field Guide
    BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENTS FOR WEEDS IN NEW ZEALAND: A Field Guide Compiled by Lynley Hayes © Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd 2005. This information may be copied and distributed to others without limitation, provided Landcare Research Ltd and the source of the information is acknowledged. Under no circumstances may a charge be made for this information without the express permission of Landcare Research Ltd. Biological control agents for weeds in New Zealand : a field guide. -- Lincoln, N.Z. : Landcare Research, 2005. ISBN 0-478-09372-1 1. Weeds -- Biological control -- New Zealand. 2. Biological pest control agents -- New Zealand. 3. Weeds – Control -- New Zealand. UDC 632.51(931):632.937 Acknowledgements We are grateful to the Forest Health Research Collaborative for funding the preparation of this field guide and to regional councils and the Department of Conservation for funding its production. Thank you to the many people at Landcare Research who provided information or pictures, checked or edited the text, helped with proof-reading, or prepared the layout, especially Christine Bezar and Jen McBride. Contents Foreword Native Insects on Gorse Heather Beetle Tips for Finding Biocontrol Agents Hemlock Moth Hieracium Gall Midge Tips for Safely Moving Biocontrol Agents Around Hieracium Gall Wasp Hieracium Rust Alligator Weed Beetle Mexican Devil Weed Gall Fly Alligator Weed Moth Mist Flower Fungus Blackberry Rust Mist Flower Gall Fly Broom Psyllid Nodding Thistle Crown Weevil Broom Seed Beetle Nodding Thistle Gall Fly Broom Twig Miner
    [Show full text]
  • Building Expertise on Animal Defense Mechanisms
    Grade 4: Module 2B: Unit 1: Lesson 5 Reading Scientific Text: Building Expertise on Animal Defense Mechanisms This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Exempt third-party content is indicated by the footer: © (name of copyright holder). Used by permission and not subject to Creative Commons license. GRADE 4: MODULE 2B: UNIT 1: LESSON 5 Reading Scientific Text: Building Expertise on Animal Defense Mechanisms Long-Term Targets Addressed (Based on NYSP12 ELA CCLS) I can paraphrase portions of a text that is read aloud to me. (SL.4.2) I can interpret information presented through charts or graphs. I can explain how that information helps me understand the text around it. (RI.4.7) I can determine the main idea using specific details from the text. (RI.4.2) Supporting Learning Targets Ongoing Assessment • I can paraphrase information presented in a read-aloud on animal defense mechanisms. • Listening Closely note-catcher (page 7 of Animal • I can make inferences about animal defense mechanisms by examining articles that include text and Defenses research journal) visuals. • Examining Visuals note-catcher (page 8 of Animal • I can determine the main idea of a section of Animal Behaviors: Animal Defenses. Defenses research journal) • Determining Main Ideas note-catcher (pages 9 and 10 of Animal Defenses research journal) • Observation of participation during Jigsaw Copyright © 2013 by Expeditionary Learning, New York, NY. All Rights Reserved. NYS Common Core ELA Curriculum • G4:M2B:U1:L5 • June 2014 • 1 GRADE 4: MODULE 2B: UNIT 1: LESSON 5 Reading Scientific Text: Building Expertise on Animal Defense Mechanisms Agenda Teaching Notes 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying and Managing Common Groundsel (Senecio Vulgaris L.) In
    MSU Extension Bulletin E3440 Identifying and managing common groundsel (Senecio vulgaris L.) in nurseries and greenhouses Debalina Saha and Carolyn Fitzgibbon Michigan State University Department of Horticulture Debalina Saha, MSU Horticulture Photo 1. Common groundsel (Senecio vulgaris) growing along the edges of walkway inside a greenhouse. Common groundsel (Senecio vulgaris) is one of the most common and problematic broadleaf Debalina Saha, MSU Horticulture weeds in nurseries and greenhouses. It belongs Photo 2. Erect and branched growth habit of common to the Asteraceae family, which also includes groundsel (Senecio vulgaris). dandelion, thistles and sunflower. It is classified identify and manage common groundsel in their as a winter annual because the seeds germinate nurseries and greenhouse operations. in late fall through early spring. Sometimes common groundsel is considered a summer annual since it has the capacity to germinate Biology of common groundsel under shady conditions in summer or fall. In addition to its general weediness, common HABITAT groundsel can be toxic to cattle, swine and Common groundsel can be found growing in horses if ingested. The toxicity is due to pyr- gardens, lawns, nursery plots, inside greenhous- rolizidine alkaloids, which can cause chronic es (under benches and on edges of walkways) liver damage to these animals (Smith-Fiola and (Photo 1), edges of yards, mulched beds around Gill, 2014; Uva et al., 1997). shrubs, fields, areas along railroads, roadsides The success of this weed lies with its ability to and waste areas. It is common in highly dis- produce enormous amount of seeds. Seed turbed areas where ground vegetation is low development starts early in its life cycle and and scant (Illinois wildflowers, 2020).
    [Show full text]