Pentachlorophenol: Toxicology and Environmental Fate by Brett Fisher However, Is Incomplete

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pentachlorophenol: Toxicology and Environmental Fate by Brett Fisher However, Is Incomplete Pentachlorophenol: Toxicology and Environmental Fate By Brett Fisher however, is incomplete. Technical grade etrated the skin than had been estimated penta contains from 4 to 12 percent by EPA: 62 percent of the penta in oil Pentachlorophenol (penta or PCP) tetrachlorophenols, which are toxic in was absorbed and 16 percent of the was first introduced for use as a wood their own right. In addition, the high penta in water.13 Two recent studies of preservative in 1936 by Dow Chemical temperatures used in manufacturing sawmill workers exposed to water- Company and Monsanto Chemical Com- penta produce several contaminants in- based penta support these find- pany.1 Penta has since been used as an cluding hexachlorobenzene, dioxins, and ings.10,14 These findings suggest that herbicide on ornamental lawns, golf furans (see Figure 1).2 workers and others, such as those liv- courses, aquatic areas, and rights-of-way; There are two general methods for ing in treated homes or children who for control of subterranean termites; as preserving wood, the pressure process play on treated playground structures, an anti-microbial agent in cooling tow- and the non-pressure process. The pres- may be at greater risk from exposure ers, adhesives, latex paints, paper coat- sure-treating process involves placing through skin contact than estimated ings, cements used with food can ends the wood in a pressure-treating vessel by EPA. and seals, coatings in reusable bulk where it is immersed in the preserva- Although most people are not occu- food storage containers, photographic tive and then subjected to applied pres- pationally exposed to penta, research- solutions, leather tanneries, and pulp sure. The excess penta is vacuumed ers for the national Health and Nutri- and paper mills; and, as a disinfectant.2 from the vessel and the treated wood is tional Examination Survey II of the Na- It is marketed under the trade names removed, inspected, stored, and tional Center for Health Statistics found Santophen, Penchlorol, Chlorophen, shipped. In the non-pressure process, Pentacon, Penwar, Sinituho and Penta penta is applied to the surface of wood Figure 1 among others.3 by spraying, brushing, dipping, and soak- Pentachlorophenol and As of 1977, about 50 million pounds ing. This process is used for short-term Some of Its Contaminants of penta were produced annually in the wood protection in construction where Cl United States.2 In 1985, 35 million pounds the wood will be protected from expo- Cl Cl of penta were manufactured in the U.S.4 sure to soil or weather through brick or Vulcan Chemicals, located in Wichita, cement barriers. This process is also Cl Cl 5 Kansas, is penta’s sole U.S. producer. used to control sapstain fungi (fungi OH In 1988, the U.S. Environmental Protec- which leave a blue stain on wood) by Pentachlorophenol tion Agency (EPA) cancelled all uses of passing green lumber through a spray O penta except for its use as a wood pre- tunnel or by dipping the wood.7 Cl Cl servative.6 Cl Cl There are two manufacturing pro- Human Exposure cesses used to produce penta: (1) the People are exposed to penta in the Cl Cl direct chlorination of phenol, the workplace, in treated homes, indoor and O Boehringer process; and (2) the alkaline outdoor air, drinking water, and food. A hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin hydrolysis of hexachlorobenzene, the Penta can enter the body through inha- Dow process. In Europe, approximately lation, ingestion of contaminated food Cl Cl equal use is made of both methods. In or water, and skin contact with treated the US, penta is produced solely by the wood. Cl Cl 7 Boehringer process. Workers in wood preserving facilities, ClO Cl Chlorination of phenol in the sawmills and other workplaces who Boehringer process occurs in two stages. handle penta or treated wood receive A hexachlorodibenzofuran In stage one, chlorine is bubbled through the most significant exposures primarily Cl phenol at 105° F to yield tri- and through skin contact and secondarily Cl Cl tetrachlorophenols (phenols with three through air.6,7,8,9,10,11 Based on limited and four chlorine atoms respectively). data from animal studies, EPA has esti- Cl Cl In stage two, the temperature is gradu- mated that human skin absorbs 50 per- Cl ° ally increased to 130 F to keep the reac- cent of the amount of penta it is exposed Hexachlorobenzene tion mixture molten and to further chlo- to from oil-based formulations and 1 per- rinate the tri- and tetrachlorophenols to cent from water-based formulations.12 Cl form pentachlorophenol. The process, Researchers from the University of Cl Cl Washington, however, who applied amounts of penta to skin from human Cl Brett Fisher coordinates NCAP’s infor- cadavers to simulate levels at which OH mation services and groundwater cam- people are exposed found more pen- A tetrachlorophenol paign. 2 JOURNAL OF PESTICIDE REFORM / VOL. 11, NO. 1 penta in 79 percent of urine samples a higher metabolic rate and therefore treated containers.16 from the general population.15 In a breathe more often relative to body In addition, use of penta treated study of 179 Arkansas children, 100 weight and blood volume than adults. wood that comes in contact with live- percent of the urine samples tested They also suggested that skin contact stock can contaminate animal prod- positive for penta with an average level with treated walls could raise blood ucts with penta or its contaminants.26 of 14 parts per billion (ppb).16 Penta levels of penta in very young chil- In a study of pork and chicken in is also present in human fat tissues dren.21 Canada, 60 percent of 144 samples and human breast milk.17,18 In fact, sur- contained penta while half of 26 veys of the literature on human expo- chicken fat samples with high levels sure to penta indicate that people liv- of penta also contained hexa-, hepta-, ing in industrialized societies will gen- or octa- dioxins (those with six, seven, erally be contaminated with penta at “In a 1976 spot survey and eight chlorine atoms per dioxin concentrations of 1 to 100 ppb.19 of selected foods, penta molecule).27 In a survey of cow milk in One source of exposure to penta in Ontario, Canada, 57 percent of 359 the general population is from indoor residues ranging from 1 samples contained penta at an aver- air and dust. Residents of log homes to 100 ppb were found age of 29 ppb. The exposure of dairy treated with penta in Kentucky were in powdered dry milk, cattle to penta was attributed to penta found to have elevated levels of penta contaminated wood shavings or saw- in their blood (580 - 1,750 ppb) and soft drinks, bread, dust used as litter; direct contact be- urine (47 - 216 ppb). The source of candy bars, cereal, tween the cows and treated wood; and the exposure was continuous vapor- contact between feed and treated ization of penta from factory-treated noodles, rice, sugar, wood.28 logs. The youngest children had the and wheat.” highest blood levels of penta, even Human Toxicology though they spent as much time in Acute Toxicity: The acute toxicity the home as older children and of penta is believed to derive from its adults.20 ability to interfere with the produc- Researchers measuring levels of Penta, and other toxins, accumulate tion of energy at the cellular level. This penta in humans reported an average in household dust and can contribute interference (uncoupling of oxidative 40 ppb in the blood of the general to the total exposure of children and phosphorylation) causes increased population and an average of 420 ppb adults. Because of their lower body cell metabolism resulting in increased in 143 residents of log homes in nine weight, greater dermal contact with heat production.3,7,19 states. The children residing in penta dust, and frequent hand-to-mouth ac- A person may have up to about 100 treated log homes were found to have tivity, young children ingest at least ppb of penta in their blood and urine 1.8 times more penta in their blood 2.5 times more dust than adults.22 In a before they begin to experience ad- than adults. Because the primary route study of German homes, penta has verse effects.1 Levels of penta found of exposure to penta in homes is been found in house dust at levels that in various organs and fluids after fatal through the air, the researchers con- remained relatively high over time poisonings range from 20 to 145 ppm cluded that children could be ex- while levels in indoor air decreased.23 in adults. Levels of penta in children pected to have more penta in their In a study of Seattle homes, penta was and infants after fatal poisonings are blood than adults because they have found in house dust at an average level lower, indicating children are more of 3.4 parts per million (ppm). In two susceptible to penta than adults. Sur- of these homes, the penta may have veys of poisonings reported in the lit- Figure 2 Predicted Average Daily been tracked in from decks that had erature suggest that the largest single Intake of Pentachlorophenol 25 been treated with penta three and five dosage that produces no illness is little years before the samples were col- less than the fatal dosage.29 .9 5.1 .09 24 .5 lected. The most common symptoms of Because an estimated 96.5 percent those experiencing penta poisoning in- of the penta in the environment will clude stuffy nose, scratchy throat, and end up in soil, researchers looking at tears in the eyes.
Recommended publications
  • Pentachlorophenol Report Response to PSB Docket #8310 Filed April 26, 2016 Pentachlorophenol Workgroup Participants
    Pentachlorophenol Report Response to PSB Docket #8310 Filed April 26, 2016 Pentachlorophenol Workgroup Participants Chuck Schwer: Group Facilitator, Agency of Natural Resources (ANR) Ashley Desmond: Agency of Natural Resources (ANR), Sites Michael B. Smith Management Section Sarah Vose: Department of Health (VDH) Bill Jordan: Public Service Department (PSD) Cary Giguere: Agency of Agriculture Food and Markets (AAFM) Jeff Comstock Linda Boccuzzo Deb Gaynor: Town of Monkton Wendy Sue Harper Kim Greenwood: Vermont Natural Resources Council (VNRC) Tim Upton: Green Mountain Power (GMP) Tim Follensbee: Vermont Electric Power Company (VELCO) Scott Allocca: Fairpoint Communications Jeff Austin Dan Weston: Washington Electric Cooperative (WEC) Scott Martino Jeff Miller: Treated Wood Council (TWC) Roger Donegan: International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Jeffrey Wimette Local 300 ii Acronyms AAFM Agency of Agriculture, Food & Markets (Vermont) ACZA Ammoniacal copper zinc arsenate ANR Agency of Natural Resources (Vermont) ATSDR Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (federal) AWPA American Wood Protection Association BMP Best Management Practices BTEX Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes CCA Chromated copper arsenate CFR Code of Federal Register CIS Consumer Information Sheet CuNap Copper napthenate FIFRA Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act g/L grams per liter GHS Global Harmonization System GIDMO Gravitational induced Downward Migration of Oil HCB hexachlorobenzene HHE Health hazard evaluation IBEW International
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Destructive Detection of Pentachlorophenol Residues in Historical Wooden Objects
    polymers Article Non-Destructive Detection of Pentachlorophenol Residues in Historical Wooden Objects Ida Kraševec 1 , Nataša Nemeˇcek 2, Maja Lozar Štamcar 2, Irena Kralj Cigi´c 1,* and Helena Prosen 1 1 Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; [email protected] (I.K.); [email protected] (H.P.) 2 National Museum of Slovenia, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; [email protected] (N.N.); [email protected] (M.L.Š.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +386-1-479-8549 Abstract: Wood is a natural polymeric material that is an important constituent of many heritage collections. Because of its susceptibility to biodegradation, it is often chemically treated with sub- stances that can be harmful to human health. One of the most widely used wood preservatives was pentachlorophenol (PCP), which is still present in museum objects today, although its use has been restricted for about forty years. The development of non-destructive methods for its determination, suitable for the analysis of valuable objects, is therefore of great importance. In this work, two non-destructive solid-phase microextraction (SPME) methods were developed and optimized, using either headspace or contact mode. They were compared with a destructive solvent extraction method and found to be suitable for quantification in the range of 7.5 to 75 mg PCP/kg wood at room tem- perature. The developed semi-quantitative methods were applied in the wooden furniture depot of Citation: Kraševec, I.; Nemeˇcek,N.; National Museum of Slovenia. PCP was detected inside two furniture objects using headspace mode.
    [Show full text]
  • TR-483: Pentachlorophenol (CASRN 87-86-5) in F344/N Rats
    NTP TECHNICAL REPORT ON THE TOXICOLOGY AND CARCINOGENESIS STUDIES OF PENTACHLOROPHENOL (CAS NO. 87-86-5) IN F344/N RATS (FEED STUDIES) NATIONAL TOXICOLOGY PROGRAM P.O. Box 12233 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 April 1999 NTP TR 483 NIH Publication No. 99-3973 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service National Institutes of Health FOREWORD The National Toxicology Program (NTP) is made up of four charter agencies of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS): the National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health; the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), National Institutes of Health; the National Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR), Food and Drug Administration; and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control. In July 1981, the Carcinogenesis Bioassay Testing Program, NCI, was transferred to the NIEHS. The NTP coordinates the relevant programs, staff, and resources from these Public Health Service agencies relating to basic and applied research and to biological assay development and validation. The NTP develops, evaluates, and disseminates scientific information about potentially toxic and hazardous chemicals. This knowledge is used for protecting the health of the American people and for the primary prevention of disease. The studies described in this Technical Report were performed under the direction of the NIEHS and were conducted in compliance with NTP laboratory health and safety requirements and must meet or exceed all applicable federal, state, and local health and safety regulations. Animal care and use were in accordance with the Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Maine Remedial Action Guidelines (Rags) for Contaminated Sites
    Maine Department of Environmental Protection Remedial Action Guidelines for Contaminated Sites (RAGs) Effective Date: May 1, 2021 Approved by: ___________________________ Date: April 27, 2021 David Burns, Director Bureau of Remediation & Waste Management Executive Summary MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 17 State House Station | Augusta, Maine 04333-0017 www.maine.gov/dep Maine Department of Environmental Protection Remedial Action Guidelines for Contaminated Sites Contents 1 Disclaimer ...................................................................................................................... 1 2 Introduction and Purpose ............................................................................................... 1 2.1 Purpose ......................................................................................................................................... 1 2.2 Consistency with Superfund Risk Assessment .............................................................................. 1 2.3 When to Use RAGs and When to Develop a Site-Specific Risk Assessment ................................. 1 3 Applicability ................................................................................................................... 2 3.1 Applicable Programs & DEP Approval Process ............................................................................. 2 3.1.1 Uncontrolled Hazardous Substance Sites ............................................................................. 2 3.1.2 Voluntary Response Action Program
    [Show full text]
  • Interagency Committee on Chemical Management
    DECEMBER 14, 2018 INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE ON CHEMICAL MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 13-17 REPORT TO THE GOVERNOR WALKE, PETER Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 2 I. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 3 II. Recommended Statutory Amendments or Regulatory Changes to Existing Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements that are Required to Facilitate Assessment of Risks to Human Health and the Environment Posed by Chemical Use in the State ............................................................................................................................ 5 III. Summary of Chemical Use in the State Based on Reported Chemical Inventories....... 8 IV. Summary of Identified Risks to Human Health and the Environment from Reported Chemical Inventories ........................................................................................................... 9 V. Summary of any change under Federal Statute or Rule affecting the Regulation of Chemicals in the State ....................................................................................................... 12 VI. Recommended Legislative or Regulatory Action to Reduce Risks to Human Health and the Environment from Regulated and Unregulated Chemicals of Emerging Concern ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Compatibility Storage Group
    CHEMICAL SEGREGATION Chemicals are to be segregated into 11 different categories depending on the compatibility of that chemical with other chemicals The Storage Groups are as follows: Group A – Compatible Organic Acids Group B – Compatible Pyrophoric & Water Reactive Materials Group C – Compatible Inorganic Bases Group D – Compatible Organic Acids Group E – Compatible Oxidizers including Peroxides Group F– Compatible Inorganic Acids not including Oxidizers or Combustible Group G – Not Intrinsically Reactive or Flammable or Combustible Group J* – Poison Compressed Gases Group K* – Compatible Explosive or other highly Unstable Material Group L – Non-Reactive Flammable and Combustible, including solvents Group X* – Incompatible with ALL other storage groups The following is a list of chemicals and their compatibility storage codes. This is not a complete list of chemicals, but is provided to give examples of each storage group: Storage Group A 94‐75‐7 2,4‐D (2,4‐Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) 94‐82‐6 2,4‐DB 609-99-4 3,5-Dinitrosalicylic acid 64‐19‐7 Acetic acid (Flammable liquid @ 102°F avoid alcohols, Amines, ox agents see SDS) 631-61-8 Acetic acid, Ammonium salt (Ammonium acetate) 108-24-7 Acetic anhydride (Flammable liquid @102°F avoid alcohols see SDS) 79‐10‐7 Acrylic acid Peroxide Former 65‐85‐0 Benzoic acid 98‐07‐7 Benzotrichloride 98‐88‐4 Benzoyl chloride 107-92-6 Butyric Acid 115‐28‐6 Chlorendic acid 79‐11‐8 Chloroacetic acid 627‐11‐2 Chloroethyl chloroformate 77‐92‐9 Citric acid 5949-29-1 Citric acid monohydrate 57-00-1 Creatine 20624-25-3
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals
    Challenges of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Linda S. Birnbaum, PhD, DABT, ATS Scientist Emeritus and Former Director (Retired) National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and National Toxicology Program EURION 5 February, 2020 – Paris, France Rachel Carson: Matron of the Modern Environmental Movement The unintended impacts 1947 DDT causes eggshell of DDT on vertebrates thinning in bald eagles nearly led to the extinction 1953 DDT found to be of the brown pelican and estrogenic the bald eagle. 1972 EPA bans DDT 1962: Silent Spring Rachel Carson The DES Tragedy Infertility *Palmer, 2001 Ectopic Pregnancy 3-5 x increase 5-10 million people exposed 40 x increase; 1:1000 Endocrine System • Chemical signals controlling many biological responses • Reproduction • Development • Neurological • Cardiovascular • Metabolism/Maintenance • Cancer • 3 major components -glands, hormones, target and immune systems Major Hormones Types • Four structural groups, with members of each group having many properties in common: • Peptides and proteins • Luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), prolactin, growth hormone, many many others • In females, FSH stimulates the growth/maturation of ovarian follicles, and LH triggers ovulation • In males, FSH enhances production of androgen binding protein by sertoli cells of the testes; critical for spermatogenesis. LH stimulates leydig cell production of testosterone • Amino acid derivatives • Thyroid hormones, catecholamines Major Hormones Types • Steroids • Derived from cholesterol • Differ
    [Show full text]
  • EPA's Hazardous Waste Listing
    Hazardous Waste Listings A User-Friendly Reference Document September 2012 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Overview of the Hazardous Waste Identification Process .............................................................. 5 Lists of Hazardous Wastes .............................................................................................................. 5 Summary Chart ............................................................................................................................... 8 General Hazardous Waste Listing Resources ................................................................................. 9 § 261.11 Criteria for listing hazardous waste. .............................................................................. 11 Subpart D-List of Hazardous Wastes ............................................................................................ 12 § 261.31 Hazardous wastes from non-specific sources. ............................................................... 13 Spent solvent wastes (F001 – F005) ......................................................................................... 13 Wastes from electroplating and other metal finishing operations (F006 - F012, and F019) ... 18 Dioxin bearing wastes (F020 - F023, and F026 – F028) .......................................................... 22 Wastes from production of certain chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons (F024
    [Show full text]
  • Dura-Treat 40 Wood Preserver – Safety Data Sheet
    SAFETY DATA SHEET 1. Identification Product identifier Dura-Treat 40 Wood Preserver Other means of identification Product code EPA Reg. No. 61483-2, PMRA Registration Number 26110 Synonyms None. Recommended use Wood preservative. Recommended restrictions Restricted use pesticide. See product label for use restrictions. Manufacturer/Importer/Supplier/Distributor information Company name KMG-Bernuth, Inc. Address 9555 W. Sam Houston Parkway S. Suite 600 Houston, TX 77099 Telephone Phone Number: 713-600-3800 Emergency telephone CHEMTREC: 1-800-424-9300 Emergency medical treatment: 1-800-322-8177 2. Hazard(s) identification Physical hazards Flammable liquids Category 4 Health hazards Acute toxicity, oral Category 3 Acute toxicity, dermal Category 3 Acute toxicity, inhalation Category 3 Skin corrosion/irritation Category 2 Serious eye damage/eye irritation Category 2B Carcinogenicity Category 2 Specific target organ toxicity, single exposure Category 1 (cardiovascular system, heart) Specific target organ toxicity, single exposure Category 3 respiratory tract irritation Specific target organ toxicity, repeated Category 1 (blood, nervous system, exposure respiratory system, heart, liver, kidney) Environmental hazards Hazardous to the aquatic environment, acute Category 1 hazard Hazardous to the aquatic environment, Category 1 long-term hazard OSHA defined hazards Not classified. Label elements Signal word Danger Hazard statement Combustible liquid. Toxic if swallowed. Toxic in contact with skin. Toxic if inhaled. Causes skin irritation. Causes eye irritation. Suspected of causing cancer. Causes damage to organs (cardiovascular system, heart). May cause respiratory irritation. Causes damage to organs (blood, nervous system, respiratory system, heart, liver, kidney) through prolonged or repeated exposure. Very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects. Dura-Treat 40 Wood Preserver SDS US 4226 Version #: 02 Revision date: 04-December-2015 Issue date: 08-May-2015 1 / 10 Precautionary statement Prevention Obtain special instructions before use.
    [Show full text]
  • Pentachlorophenol OSPAR Commission
    Hazardous Substances Series --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pentachlorophenol OSPAR Commission 2001 (2004 Update) OSPAR Commission, 2001: Pentachlorophenol __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (the “OSPAR Convention”) was opened for signature at the Ministerial Meeting of the former Oslo and Paris Commissions in Paris on 22 September 1992. The Convention entered into force on 25 March 1998. It has been ratified by Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom and approved by the European Community and Spain. La Convention pour la protection du milieu marin de l'Atlantique du Nord-Est, dite Convention OSPAR, a été ouverte à la signature à la réunion ministérielle des anciennes Commissions d'Oslo et de Paris, à Paris le 22 septembre 1992. La Convention est entrée en vigueur le 25 mars 1998. La Convention a été ratifiée par l'Allemagne, la Belgique, le Danemark, la Finlande, la France, l’Irlande, l’Islande, le Luxembourg, la Norvège, les Pays-Bas, le Portugal, le Royaume-Uni de Grande Bretagne et d’Irlande du Nord, la Suède et la Suisse et approuvée par la Communauté européenne et l’Espagne. © OSPAR Commission, 2001. Permission may be granted by the publishers for the report to be wholly
    [Show full text]
  • 711701023.Pdf
    research for RIJKSINSTITUUT VOOR VOLKSGEZONDHEID EN MILIEU man and environment NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT RIVM report 711701 023 Technical evaluation of the Intervention Values for Soil/sediment and Groundwater Human and ecotoxicological risk assessment and derivation of risk limits for soil, aquatic sediment and groundwater J.P.A. Lijzen, A.J. Baars, P.F. Otte, M.G.J. Rikken, F.A. Swartjes, E.M.J. Verbruggen and A.P. van Wezel February 2001 This investigation has been performed by account of The Ministry of Housing Spatial Planning and the Environment, Directorate General for the Environment (DGM), Directorate of Soil, Water and Rural Areas, within the framework of project 711701, Risk in relation to Soil Quality. RIVM, P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, telephone: 31 - 30 - 274 91 11; fax: 31 - 30 - 274 29 71 page 2 of 147 RIVM report 711701 023 Abstract Intervention Values are generic soil quality standards used to classify historically contaminated soils (i.e. before 1987) as seriously contaminated in the framework of the Dutch Soil Protection Act. In 1994 Intervention Values were published for 70 (groups of) compounds. These values, based on potential risks to human health and ecosystems, are technically evaluated on the basis of recent scientific views and data on risk assessment. Serious Risk Concentrations (SRCs, formerly called SCC) are revised for soil and groundwater; in addition SRCs are derived for sediment. A policy phase will start in 2001 to determine how the results will be implemented for setting Intervention Values. Starting points for the derivation of SRCs, partly chosen because of the policy context in which the SRCs are used, are mentioned and discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Banned Pesticide List
    BANNED PESTICIDE tIST No Common Name Trade Name Pesticide Type Toxicity Class 1 1,1,2,2-tetra chloroethane Acetylene tetrachloride (rum eanr) Insecticide lb 2 aldrin Octaiene, Aldrex Insecticide Ib 3 AZN Insecticide Ib azinphos'methyl Gusathion Insecticide Ib 5 Insecti€ide Ib 6 camphechlor Insecticide Ib I chlordane Octarhior Insecticide II 8 Insecticide Ib 9 nsecticide IPA I 10 chlormephos Dotan Insecticide Ia 11 Insecticide Ia 12 DDI Anofex, Neocide, Chlorophenthoate Insecticide Ib jeldrer, dieldrin Octalor, d dieldrite Insectrcrde Ia 1.4 endosulfan Thiodan (veryh shlvroxicto lish) lnsecticide ll Endocide lnsecticide Ib endrin Hexadrin, Endrix, Mendrin lnsecticide Ia 1l ethylene dichloride Bualta, Eusan 77 Insecticide I 18 ethylene oxide Oxirane {iumieano lnsecticide In 19 flucythrinate Cybolt, Cythrin, Pay off Insecticide Ib 20 D!,fonate lnse€ticide Ia 21 Deltanet, Promet Insecticide Ib 22 gamma-HCH (hexachlorocyctohexdne) Gamma-Col, Lindane Insecticide II 23 heptachlor Heptamul, Heptox, Hepta lnsecticide II )4 heptenophos Hostaquick, Ragadan lnsectlcrde 2.,.,':'.t )X Ib 25 isophenphos Oftanol, Insecticide /.,j'/ tE' \: tb 26 isoxathion Karphos, rnsecrcrde .t.l L r&'(l) l.\ Ib 27 Jumbda cyhalothrin Karate (very hishlyroxic to fish) Insecr,c'de Ui\ €,,/./' II 2A methylene chlofide Dichloromethane (rumisan0 Insecticide \r --\>:7 */ II 29 Mirex lnsecticide Ib 30 nicotine Nico SoaD Insecticide Ib oxvdemeton-methvl Metasvstox R, lnsecticide Ib 32 parathion-methyl Foldol, Metacide, Fostox lnsecticide I 33 pirimiphos-ethyl Primicid lnsecticide
    [Show full text]